Posttransplant reduction in preexisting donor‐specific antibody levels after belatacept‐ versus cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression: Post hoc analyses of BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT

BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT were phase III studies of cytotoxic T‐cell crossmatch–negative kidney transplant recipients randomized to belatacept more intense (MI)‐based, belatacept less intense (LI)‐based, or cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. Following study completion, presence/absence of HLA‐specific antibodies was determined centrally via solid‐phase flow cytometry screening. Stored sera from anti‐HLA–positive patients were further tested with a single‐antigen bead assay to determine antibody specificities, presence/absence of donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs), and mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of any DSAs present. The effect of belatacept‐based and cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression on MFI was explored post hoc in patients with preexisting DSAs enrolled to BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT. In BENEFIT, preexisting DSAs were detected in 4.6%, 4.9%, and 6.3% of belatacept MI‐treated, belatacept LI‐treated, and cyclosporine‐treated patients, respectively. The corresponding values in BENEFIT‐EXT were 6.0%, 5.7%, and 9.2%. In both studies, most preexisting DSAs were of class I specificity. Over the first 24 months posttransplant, a greater proportion of preexisting DSAs in belatacept‐treated versus cyclosporine‐treated patients exhibited decreases or no change in MFI. MFI decline was more apparent with belatacept MI‐based versus belatacept LI‐based immunosuppression in both studies and more pronounced in BENEFIT‐EXT versus BENEFIT. Although derived post hoc, these data suggest that belatacept‐based immunosuppression decreases preexisting DSAs more effectively than cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression.     

De novo donor‐specific antibodies in belatacept‐treated vs cyclosporine‐treated kidney‐transplant recipients: Post hoc analyses of the randomized phase III BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT studies

Donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with an increased risk of antibody‐mediated rejection and graft failure. In BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT, kidney‐transplant recipients were randomized to receive belatacept more intense (MI)–based, belatacept less intense (LI)–based, or cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression for up to 7 years (84 months). The presence/absence of HLA‐specific antibodies was determined at baseline, at months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84, and at the time of clinically suspected episodes of acute rejection, using solid‐phase flow‐cytometry screening. Samples from anti‐HLA‐positive patients were further tested with a single‐antigen bead assay to determine antibody specificities, presence/absence of DSAs, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of any DSAs present. In BENEFIT, de novo DSAs developed in 1.4%, 3.5%, and 12.1% of belatacept MI‐treated, belatacept LI‐treated, and cyclosporine‐treated patients, respectively. The corresponding values in BENEFIT‐EXT were 3.8%, 1.1%, and 11.2%. Per Kaplan‐Meier analysis, de novo DSA incidence was significantly lower in belatacept‐treated vs cyclosporine‐treated patients over 7 years in both studies (P < .01). In patients who developed de novo DSAs, belatacept‐based immunosuppression was associated with numerically lower MFI vs cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. Although derived post hoc, these data suggest that belatacept‐based immunosuppression suppresses de novo DSA development more effectively than cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression.     

B cell reconstitution following alemtuzumab induction under a belatacept‐based maintenance regimen

Lymphocyte depletion has been shown to control costimulation blockade‐resistant rejection but, in some settings, to exacerbate antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR). We have used alemtuzumab, which depletes T and B cells, combined with belatacept and rapamycin and previously reported control of both costimulation blockade‐resistant rejection and AMR. To evaluate this regimen's effect on B cell signatures, we investigated 40 patients undergoing this therapy. B cell counts and phenotypes were interrogated using flow cytometry, and serum was analyzed for total IgG, IgM, and donor‐specific alloantibody (DSA). Alemtuzumab induction produced pan‐lymphocyte depletion; B cells repopulated faster and more completely than T cells. Reconstituting B cells were predominantly naïve, and memory B cells were significantly reduced (P = .001) post repopulation. Two B cell populations with potential immunomodulatory effects—regulatory (CD38^hiCD24^hiIgM^hiCD20^hi) and transitional B cells (CD19⁺CD27^?IgD⁺CD38^hi)—were enriched posttransplant (P = .001). Total serum IgG decreased from baseline (P = .016) while IgM levels remained stable. Five patients developed DSAs within 36 months posttransplant, but none developed AMR. Baseline IgG levels in these patients were significantly higher than those in patients without DSAs. These findings suggest that belatacept and rapamycin together limit homeostatic B cell activation following B cell depletion and may lessen the risk of AMR. This regimen warrants prospective, comparative study. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00565773.     

Development and outcomes of de novo donor‐specific antibodies in low,moderate, and high immunological risk kidney transplant recipients

De novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSA) play an important role in antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft failure, yet their development in kidney transplant recipients (KTx) of higher immunological risk has not been characterized. We prospectively determined the incidence of dnDSA at 3 and 12 months posttransplant and assessed their associations with outcomes in recipients stratified by low, moderate, and high immunological risk. Adult KTx were screened for DSA pretransplant, months 3 and 12 posttransplant, and when clinically indicated. Outcomes included incidence of dnDSA, death‐censored graft survival (DCGS), and ABMR. Of 371 recipients, 154 (42%) were transplanted across a pretransplant DSA that became undetectable by 12 months posttransplant in 78% of cases. dnDSA were detected in 16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12‐20%) by 3 months and 23% (95% CI: 18‐29%) by 12 months posttransplant. Incidence at 12 months was higher in the moderate (30%) and high‐risk groups (29%) compared to the low‐risk group (16%). dnDSA were associated with an increased risk of ABMR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1‐4.4; P = .04) but were not an independent risk factor for DCGS. In conclusion, dnDSA were more frequent in transplant recipients of higher immune risk and associated with an increased risk of ABMR.     

The impact of belatacept on third‐party HLA alloantibodies in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients

Recent evidence suggests that belatacept reduces the durability of preexisting antibodies to class I and class II human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). In this case series of 163 highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates whose calculated panel‐reactive antibody (cPRA) activity was ≥98% to 100%, the impact of belatacept on preexisting HLA antibodies was assessed. Of the 163 candidates, 72 underwent transplantation between December 4, 2014 and April 15, 2017; 60 of these transplanted patients remained on belatacept consecutively for at least 6 months. We observed a decrease in the breadth and/or strength of HLA class I antibodies as assessed by FlowPRA in belatacept‐treated patients compared to controls who did not receive belatacept. Specifically, significant HLA antibody reduction was evident for class I (P < .0009). Posttransplant belatacept‐treated patients also had a clinically significant reduction in their cPRA compared to controls (P < .01). Collectively, these findings suggest belatacept can reduce HLA class I antibodies in a significant proportion of highly sensitized recipients and could be an option to improve pretransplant compatibility with organ donors.     

Ten‐year outcomes in a randomized phase II study of kidney transplant recipients administered belatacept 4‐weekly or 8‐weekly

In the phase II IM103‐100 study, kidney transplant recipients were first randomized to belatacept more‐intensive‐based (n = 74), belatacept less‐intensive‐based (n = 71), or cyclosporine‐based (n = 73) immunosuppression. At 3‐6 months posttransplant, belatacept‐treated patients were re‐randomized to receive belatacept every 4 weeks (4‐weekly, n = 62) or every 8 weeks (8‐weekly, n = 60). Patients initially randomized to cyclosporine continued to receive cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. Cumulative rates of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) from first randomization to year 10 were 22.8%, 37.0%, and 25.8% for belatacept more‐intensive, belatacept less‐intensive, and cyclosporine, respectively (belatacept more‐intensive vs cyclosporine: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47‐1.92; P = .89; belatacept less‐intensive vs cyclosporine: HR = 1.61; 95% CI 0.85‐3.05; P = .15). Cumulative BPAR rates from second randomization to year 10 for belatacept 4‐weekly, belatacept 8‐weekly, and cyclosporine were 11.1%, 21.9%, and 13.9%, respectively (belatacept 4‐weekly vs cyclosporine: HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.35‐3.17, P = .92; belatacept 8‐weekly vs cyclosporine: HR = 2.00, 95% CI 0.75‐5.35, P = .17). Renal function trends were estimated using a repeated‐measures model. Estimated mean GFR values at year 10 for belatacept 4‐weekly, belatacept 8‐weekly, and cyclosporine were 67.0, 68.7, and 42.7 mL/min per 1.73 m², respectively (P<.001 for overall treatment effect). Although not statistically significant, rates of BPAR were 2‐fold higher in patients administered belatacept every 8 weeks vs every 4 weeks.     

Benefits and limitations of belatacept in 4 hand‐transplanted patients

Belatacept (cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte–associated protein 4 Ig) is an emerging treatment in kidney transplantation. Lack of nephrotoxicity and possibly an inhibitory effect on the development of donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) make it an interesting agent in hand transplantation. To reduce calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression and preserve kidney function, we have added belatacept to the therapeutic regimen of 4 hand‐transplanted patients at month 4 and at 6, 9, and 13 years after hand–forearm transplantation. Patients received 5 mg/kg belatacept every 2 weeks, and the dosing interval was extended to 4 weeks after 5 applications. Belatacept was initially well tolerated in all cases. Two patients were weaned to a low‐dose tacrolimus monotherapy together with monthly belatacept applications. One patient is taking belatacept with lowered tacrolimus and sirolimus trough levels. A fourth patient had significant levels of DSAs at time of conversion and progressed to a severe necrotizing rejection early despite an unaltered baseline immunosuppression. Finger skin necrosis and histologic signs of severe chronic allograft vasculopathy eventually led to amputation of the graft. Implementation of belatacept can be beneficial in hand transplantation. However, our findings indicated both potential and caution and reflection of the immunologic state at the time of conversion.     

Impact of Early Blood Transfusion After Kidney Transplantation on the Incidence of Donor‐Specific Anti‐HLA Antibodies

Little is known about the impact of posttransplant blood transfusion on the sensitization of anti‐HLA antibodies and the formation of donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs). The aims of our study were to determine the 1‐year incidence of DSAs (assessed using a solid‐phase assay) and antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant patients who had or had not received a blood transfusion during the first year after transplantation. Included were 390 non–HLA‐sensitized patients who had received an ABO‐compatible kidney transplant and had not previously or simultaneously received a nonkidney transplant. Overall, 64% of patients received a red blood cell transfusion within the first year after transplantation, most within the first month. The overall 1‐year incidence of DSAs was significantly higher in patients that had undergone transfusion (7.2% vs. 0.7% in patients with no transfusion, p < 0.0001). AMR occurred more often in the transfusion group (n = 15, 6%) compared with the nontransfusion group (n = 2, 1.4%; p = 0.04). Blood transfusion was an independent predictive factor for de novo DSA formation but not for AMR. Patients who had a transfusion and developed DSAs were more often treated with cyclosporin A (n = 10, 55.5%) rather than tacrolimus (n = 45, 19.4%; p = 0.0001). In conclusion, early posttransplant blood transfusion may increase immunological risk, especially in underimmunosuppressed patients.     

Long‐Term Belatacept Exposure Maintains Efficacy and Safety at 5 Years: Results From the Long‐Term Extension of the BENEFIT Study

The Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First‐line Immunosuppression Trial randomized patients receiving a living or standard criteria deceased donor kidney transplant to a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept or cyclosporine A (CsA). The 5‐year results of the long‐term extension (LTE) cohort are reported. A total of 456 (68.5% of intent‐to‐treat) patients entered the LTE at 36 months; 406 patients (89%) completed 60 months. Between Months 36 and 60, death occurred in 2%, 1% and 5% of belatacept MI, belatacept LI and CsA patients, respectively; graft loss occurred in 0% belatacept and 2% of CsA patients. Acute rejection between Months 36 and 60 was rare: zero belatacept MI, one belatacept LI and one CsA. Rates for infections and malignancies for Months 36–60 were generally similar across belatacept groups and CsA, respectively: fungal infections (14%, 15%, 12%), viral infections (21%, 18%, 16%) and malignancies (6%, 6%, 9%). No new posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder cases occurred after 36 months. Mean calculated GFR (MDRD, mL/min/1.73 m²) at Month 60 was 74 for belatacept MI, 76 for belatacept LI and 53 for CsA. These results show that the renal function benefit and safety profile observed in belatacept‐treated patients in the early posttransplant period was sustained through 5 years.     

Belatacept‐based immunosuppression with simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and early corticosteroid withdrawal: A prospective,randomized multicenter trial

Simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance (CNIA) and early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESW) have not been achieved primarily due to excessive acute rejection. This trial compared 2 belatacept‐based CNIA/ESW regimens with a tacrolimus‐based ESW regimen. Kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive alemtuzumab/belatacept, rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin (rATG)/belatacept, or rATG/tacrolimus. The combinatorial primary endpoint consisted of patient death, renal allograft loss, or a Modification of Diet in Renal Disease–calculated eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m² at 12 months. Results are reported by treatment group (alemtuzumab/belatacept, rATG/belatacept, and rATG/tacrolimus). Superiority was not observed at 1 year for the primary endpoint (9/107 [8.4%], 15/104 [14.4%], and 14/105 [13.3%], respectively; P = NS) for either belatacept‐based regimen. Differences were not observed for secondary endpoints (death, death‐censored graft loss, or estimated glomerular filtration rates < 45 mL/min/1.73 m²). Differences were observed in biopsy‐proved acute cellular rejection (10.3%, 18.3%, and 1.9%, respectively) (P < .001), but not in antibody‐mediated rejection, mixed acute rejection, or de novo donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies. Neurologic and electrolyte abnormality adverse events were less frequent under belatacept. Belatacept‐based CNIA/ESW regimens did not prove to be superior for the primary or secondary endpoints. Belatacept‐treated patients demonstrated an increase in biopsy‐proved acute cellular rejection and reduced neurologic and metabolic adverse events. These results demonstrate that simultaneous CNIA/ESW is feasible without excessive acute rejection.     

Long‐Term Outcomes in Belatacept‐ Versus Cyclosporine‐Treated Recipients of Extended Criteria Donor Kidneys: Final Results From BENEFIT‐EXT,a Phase III Randomized Study

In the Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First‐Line Immunosuppression Trial–Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT‐EXT), extended criteria donor kidney recipients were randomized to receive belatacept‐based (more intense [MI] or less intense [LI]) or cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. In prior analyses, belatacept was associated with significantly better renal function compared with cyclosporine. In this prospective analysis of the intent‐to‐treat population, efficacy and safety were compared across regimens at 7 years after transplant. Overall, 128 of 184 belatacept MI–treated, 138 of 175 belatacept LI–treated and 108 of 184 cyclosporine‐treated patients contributed data to these analyses. Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing time to death or graft loss were 0.915 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.625–1.339; p = 0.65) for belatacept MI versus cyclosporine and 0.927 (95% CI 0.634–1.356; p = 0.70) for belatacept LI versus cyclosporine. Mean estimated GFR (eGFR) plus or minus standard error at 7 years was 53.9 ± 1.9, 54.2 ± 1.9, and 35.3 ± 2.0 mL/min per 1.73 m² for belatacept MI, belatacept LI and cyclosporine, respectively (p < 0.001 for overall treatment effect). HRs comparing freedom from death, graft loss or eGFR <20 mL/min per 1.73 m² were 0.754 (95% CI 0.536–1.061; p = 0.10) for belatacept MI versus cyclosporine and 0.706 (95% CI 0.499–0.998; p = 0.05) for belatacept LI versus cyclosporine. Acute rejection rates and safety profiles of belatacept‐ and cyclosporine‐based treatment were similar. De novo donor‐specific antibody incidence was lower for belatacept (p ≤ 0.0001). Relative to cyclosporine, belatacept was associated with similar death and graft loss and improved renal function at 7 years after transplant and had a safety profile consistent with previous reports.     

Evolution and Clinical Pathologic Correlations of De Novo Donor‐Specific HLA Antibody Post Kidney Transplant

The natural history for patients with de novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSA) and the risk factors for its development have not been well defined. Furthermore, clinical and histologic correlation with serologic data is limited. We studied 315 consecutive renal transplants without pretransplant DSA, with a mean follow‐up of 6.2 ± 2.9 years. Protocol (n = 215) and for cause (n = 163) biopsies were analyzed. Solid phase assays were used to screen for dnDSA posttransplant. A total of 47 out of 315 (15%) patients developed dnDSA at a mean of 4.6 ± 3.0 years posttransplant. Independent predictors of dnDSA were HLA‐DRβ1 MM > 0 (OR 5.66, p < 0.006); and nonadherence (OR 8.75, p < 0.001); with a strong trend toward clinical rejection episodes preceding dnDSA (OR 1.57 per rejection episode, p = 0.061). The median 10‐year graft survival for those with dnDSA was lower than the No dnDSA group (57% vs. 96%, p < 0.0001). Pathology consistent with antibody‐mediated injury can occur and progress in patients with dnDSA in the absence of graft dysfunction and furthermore, nonadherence and cellular rejection contribute to dnDSA development and progression to graft loss.     

Specificity,strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation

In this cohort study (N = 924), we investigated the evolution and clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies (preDSA), detected in the single‐antigen beads assay but complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch‐negative. Donor specificity of the preDSA (N = 107) was determined by high‐resolution genotyping of donor‐recipient pairs. We found that in 52% of the patients with preDSA, preDSA spontaneously resolved within the first 3 months posttransplant. PreDSA that persisted posttransplant had higher pretransplant median fluorescence intensity values and more specificity against DQ. Patients with both resolved and persistent DSA had a high incidence of histological picture of antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR_h; 54% and 59% respectively). Patients with preDSA that persisted posttransplant had worse 10‐year graft survival compared to resolved DSA and preDSA‐negative patients. Compared to cases without preDSA, Cox modeling revealed an increased risk of graft failure only in the patients with persistent DSA, in the presence (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.3) but also in the absence (HR = 4.3) of ABMR_h. In contrast, no increased risk of graft failure was seen in patients with resolved DSA. We conclude that persistence of preDSA posttransplant has a negative impact on graft survival, beyond ABMR_h. Even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low median fluorescence intensity DSA and non‐DQ preDSA often disappear early posttransplantation and are not deleterious for graft outcome.     

Population level outcomes and cost‐effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment pre‐ vs postkidney transplantation

Direct‐acting antivirals approved for use in patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) now exist. HCV‐positive (HCV+) ESRD patients have the opportunity to decrease the waiting times for transplantation by accepting HCV‐infected kidneys. The optimal timing for HCV treatment (pre‐ vs posttransplant) among kidney transplant candidates is unknown. Monte Carlo microsimulation of 100 000 candidates was used to examine the cost‐effectiveness of HCV treatment pretransplant vs posttransplant by liver fibrosis stage and waiting time over a lifetime time horizon using 2 regimens approved for ESRD patients. Treatment pretransplant yielded higher quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with posttransplant treatment in all subgroups except those with Meta‐analysis of Histological Data in Viral Hepatitis stage F0 (pretransplant: 5.7 QALYs vs posttransplant: 5.8 QALYs). However, treatment posttransplant was cost‐saving due to decreased dialysis duration with the use of HCV‐infected kidneys (pretransplant: $735 700 vs posttransplant: $682 400). Using a willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $100 000, treatment pretransplant was not cost‐effective except for those with Meta‐analysis of Histological Data in Viral Hepatitis stage F3 whose fibrosis progression was halted. If HCV+ candidates had access to HCV‐infected donors and were transplanted ≥9 months sooner than HCV‐negative candidates, treatment pretransplant was no longer cost‐effective (incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio [ICER]: $107 100). In conclusion, optimal timing of treatment depends on fibrosis stage and access to HCV+ kidneys but generally favors posttransplant HCV eradication.     

Utility of protocol kidney biopsies for de novo donor‐specific antibodies

There is limited information about the role of protocol kidney biopsies for de novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSA) in kidney transplant recipients, especially in those with stable graft function. We initiated a routine posttransplant DSA monitoring and surveillance biopsy program for dnDSA since 2014. We identified 45 kidney transplant recipients with dnDSA detected between January 2014 and February 2017 who underwent kidney biopsy within 60 days of detection of dnDSA. Twenty‐nine (64%) had stable graft function and 16 (36%) had impaired graft function at the time of dnDSA detection. Even in the group with stable graft function, we found a high rate of rejection (53%) on biopsy. Eighty‐eight percent of patients with impaired graft function had rejection. Those patients with impaired graft function had significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months postbiopsy and at last follow‐up. Those with impaired graft function had more graft failures; however, this result was not statistically significant. The high rate of asymptomatic rejection, and the fact that outcomes in asymptomatic patients are poor, is in support of the utility of surveillance biopsies in patients with dnDSA.     

Ultra‐short duration direct acting antiviral prophylaxis to prevent virus transmission from hepatitis C viremic donors to hepatitis C negative kidney transplant recipients

We conducted an adaptive design single‐center pilot trial between October 2017 and November 2018 to determine the safety and efficacy of ultra‐short‐term perioperative pangenotypic direct acting antiviral (DAA) prophylaxis for deceased hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐nucleic acid test (NAT) positive donors to HCV negative kidney recipients (D+/R?). In Group 1, 10 patients received one dose of SOF/VEL (sofusbuvir/velpatasvir) pretransplant and one dose on posttransplant Day 1. In Group 2A (N = 15) and the posttrial validation (Group 2B; N = 25) phase, patients received two additional SOF/VEL doses (total 4) on Days 2 and 3 posttransplant. Development of posttransplant HCV transmission triggered 12‐week DAA therapy. For available donor samples (N = 27), median donor viral load was 1.37E + 06 IU/mL (genotype [GT]1a: 70%; GT2: 7%; GT3: 23%). Overall viral transmission rate was 12% (6/50; Group 1:30% [3/10]; Group 2A:13% [2/15]; Group 2B:4% [1/25]). For the 6 viremic patients, 5 (83%) achieved sustained virologic response (3 with first‐line DAA therapy; and two after retreatment with second‐line DAA). At a median follow‐up of 8 months posttransplant, overall patient and allograft survivals were 98%, respectively. The 4‐day strategy reduced viral transmission to 7.5% (3/40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8%‐20.5%) and could result in avoidance of prolonged posttransplant DAA therapy for most D+/R ? transplants.     

Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Extended Criteria Donor Kidneys by Subtype: Subgroup Analysis of BENEFIT‐EXT at 7 Years After Transplant

The phase III Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First‐Line Immunosuppression Trial–Extended Criteria Donors Trial (BENEFIT‐EXT) study compared more or less intensive belatacept‐based immunosuppression with cyclosporine (CsA)–based immunosuppression in recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys. In this post hoc analysis, patient outcomes were assessed according to donor kidney subtype. In total, 68.9% of patients received an expanded criteria donor kidney (United Network for Organ Sharing definition), 10.1% received a donation after cardiac death kidney, and 21.0% received a kidney with an anticipated cold ischemic time ≥24 h. Over 7 years, time to death or graft loss was similar between belatacept‐ and CsA‐based immunosuppression, regardless of donor kidney subtype. In all three donor kidney cohorts, estimated mean GFR increased over months 1–84 for belatacept‐based treatment but declined for CsA‐based treatment. The estimated differences in GFR significantly favored each belatacept‐based regimen versus the CsA‐based regimen in the three subgroups (p < 0.0001 for overall treatment effect). No differences in the safety profile of belatacept were observed by donor kidney subtype.     

Belatacept in renal transplant recipient with mild immunologic risk factor: A pilot prospective study (BELACOR)

The benefit of belatacept on antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) incidence after kidney transplant with preformed donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) has never been assessed. Between 2014 and 2016, we conducted a multicenter prospective clinical trial with 49 patients to determine kidney allograft outcome in recipients with preformed DSAs (maximal mean fluorescence intensity 500 to 3000) treated with belatacept (BELACOR trial). Immunosuppressive strategy included antithymocyte globulin, belatacept, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. An ancillary control group was designed retrospectively, including patients fulfilling the same inclusion criteria treated with calcineurin inhibitors. In BELACOR group, no patient exhibited acute ABMR, patient and allograft survival at 1 year was 100% and 95.4%, respectively, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was 53.2 mL/min/1.73 m². However, the 12‐month incidence of acute T cell–mediated rejection was 25.4% (14.5% to 42.4%). Comparison with the control group showed significantly higher T cell–mediated rejection incidence only in the BELACOR group (P = .003). Considering the DSAs, the outcome was similar in the 2 groups except a significantly higher number of patients displayed a complete disappearance of class II DSAs in the BELACOR group (P = .001). Belatacept was not associated with an acute ABMR increased risk and may be considered as immunosuppressive strategy in transplant recipients with preformed DSAs (maximal mean fluorescence intensity 500 to 3000). Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.     

Trajectories of health‐related quality of life among renal transplant patients associated with graft failure and symptom distress: Analysis of the BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT trials

Understanding the correlation between transplant symptoms, health‐related quality of life (HRQoL), and graft outcomes is needed to support patient‐focused drug development and posttransplant management. A post‐hoc analysis of patient‐reported outcomes from the Phase III belatacept trials was conducted in order to investigate the interrelationship between trajectories of HRQoL, symptom experience, and allograft outcomes. HRQoL and symptom experience were evaluated using Short‐Form 36 Survey (SF‐36) and Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Distress Scale (MTSOSD‐59R), respectively. HRQoL was captured in 831 eligible renal transplant patients at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months posttransplant. Following transplantation, patients reported improvements in all SF‐36 subscales compared to baseline. Latent class analysis revealed four trajectories in perceived general health, which were associated with graft failure after adjustment. Compared to patients with good perceived health, patients with fair and poor perceived health had 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5‐14.8, P < .01) and 19.8 (95% CI 5.9‐66.0, P < .01) times the risk of graft failure, respectively. Using multinomial logistic regression, different sets of symptoms were associated with perceived general health at baseline and 12 months posttransplant. The study supports monitoring HRQoL and symptom experience to capture each patient's health perspective, improve drug development, and optimize posttransplant management.     

Racial differences in incident de novo donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibody among primary renal allograft recipients: results from a single center cohort study

Controversy exists as to whether African American (AA) transplant recipients are at risk for developing de novo donor‐specific anti‐human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (dnDSA). We studied 341 HLA‐mismatched, primary renal allograft recipients who were consecutively transplanted between 3/1999 and 12/2010. Sera were collected sequentially pre‐ and post‐transplant and tested for anti‐HLA immunoglobulin G (IgG) via single antigen bead assay. Of the 341 transplant patients (225 AA and 116 non‐AA), 107 developed dnDSA at a median of 9.2 months post‐transplant. AA patients had a 5‐year dnDSA incidence of 35%. This was significantly higher than the 5‐year dnDSA incidence for non‐AA patients (21%). DQ mismatch (risk) and receiving a living‐related donor (LRD) transplant (protective) were transplant factors associated with dnDSA. Within the AA patient cohort, HLA‐DQ mismatch, not‐receiving a LRD transplant, nonadherence and BK viraemia were the most common factors associated with early dnDSA (occurring <24 months post‐transplant). Nonadherence and pretransplant diabetes history were the strong precursors to late dnDSA. Despite the higher rates of dnDSA in the AA cohort, post‐dnDSA survival was the same in AA and non‐AA patients. This study suggests that DQ matching, increasing LRD transplantation in AA patients and minimizing under‐immunosuppression will be key to preventing dnDSA.