Tacrolimus to Belatacept Conversion Following Hand Transplantation: A Case Report

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has emerged as a viable limb replacement strategy for selected patients with upper limb amputation. However, allograft rejection has been seen in essentially all reported VCA recipients indicating a requirement for substantial immunosuppressive therapy. Calcineurin inhibitors have served as the centerpiece agent in all reported cases, and CNI‐associated complications associated with the broad therapeutic effects and side effects of calcineurin inhibitors have been similarly common. Recently, belatacept has been approved as a calcineurin inhibitor replacement in kidney transplantation, but to date, its use in VCA has not been reported. Herein, we report on the case of a hand transplant recipient who developed recurrent acute rejection with alloantibody formation and concomitant calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, all of which resolved upon conversion from a maintenance regimen of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids to belatacept and sirolimus. This case indicates that belatacept may be a reasonable maintenance immunosuppressive alternative for use in VCA, providing sufficient prophylaxis from rejection with a reduced side effect profile, the latter being particularly relevant for nonlife threatening conditions typically treated by VCA.     

Belatacept Rescue Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Vascular Lesions: A Case Control Study

Immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with decreased graft function and severe histological vascular changes can be particularly challenging. Belatacept could be a valuable option, as a rescue therapy in this context. We report a retrospective case control study comparing a CNI to belatacept switch in 17 patients with vascular damage and low eGFR to a control group of 18 matched patients with CNI continuation. Belatacept switch was performed on average 51.5 months after kidney transplantation (6.2–198 months). There was no difference between the two groups regarding eGFR at inclusion, and 3 months before inclusion. In the “CNI to belatacept switch group,” mean eGFR increased significantly from 23.5 ± 6.7 mL/min/1.73m² on day 0, to 30.4 ± 9.1 mL/min/1.73 m² on month 6 (p < 0.001) compared to the control group, in which no improvement was observed. These results were still significant on month 12. Two patients experienced biopsy‐proven acute rejection. One was effectively treated without belatacept discontinuation. Two patients needed belatacept discontinuation for infection. In conclusion, the remplacement of CNI with belatacept in patients with decreased allograft function and vascular lesions is associated with an improvement in eGFR.     

Belatacept and Sirolimus Prolong Nonhuman Primate Renal Allograft Survival Without a Requirement for Memory T Cell Depletion

Belatacept is an inhibitor of CD28/B7 costimulation that is clinically indicated as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) alternative in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids after renal transplantation. We sought to develop a clinically translatable, nonlymphocyte depleting, belatacept‐based regimen that could obviate the need for both CNIs and steroids. Thus, based on murine data showing synergy between costimulation blockade and mTOR inhibition, we studied rhesus monkeys undergoing MHC‐mismatched renal allotransplants treated with belatacept and the mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus. To extend prior work on costimulation blockade‐resistant rejection, some animals also received CD2 blockade with alefacept (LFA3‐Ig). Belatacept and sirolimus therapy successfully prevented rejection in all animals. Tolerance was not induced, as animals rejected after withdrawal of therapy. The regimen did not deplete T cells. Alefecept did not add a survival benefit to the optimized belatacept and sirolimus regimen, despite causing an intended depletion of memory T cells, and caused a marked reduction in regulatory T cells. Furthermore, alefacept‐treated animals had a significantly increased incidence of CMV reactivation, suggesting that this combination overly compromised protective immunity. These data support belatacept and sirolimus as a clinically translatable, nondepleting, CNI‐free, steroid‐sparing immunomodulatory regimen that promotes sustained rejection‐free allograft survival after renal transplantation.     

Benefits and limitations of belatacept in 4 hand‐transplanted patients

Belatacept (cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte–associated protein 4 Ig) is an emerging treatment in kidney transplantation. Lack of nephrotoxicity and possibly an inhibitory effect on the development of donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) make it an interesting agent in hand transplantation. To reduce calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression and preserve kidney function, we have added belatacept to the therapeutic regimen of 4 hand‐transplanted patients at month 4 and at 6, 9, and 13 years after hand–forearm transplantation. Patients received 5 mg/kg belatacept every 2 weeks, and the dosing interval was extended to 4 weeks after 5 applications. Belatacept was initially well tolerated in all cases. Two patients were weaned to a low‐dose tacrolimus monotherapy together with monthly belatacept applications. One patient is taking belatacept with lowered tacrolimus and sirolimus trough levels. A fourth patient had significant levels of DSAs at time of conversion and progressed to a severe necrotizing rejection early despite an unaltered baseline immunosuppression. Finger skin necrosis and histologic signs of severe chronic allograft vasculopathy eventually led to amputation of the graft. Implementation of belatacept can be beneficial in hand transplantation. However, our findings indicated both potential and caution and reflection of the immunologic state at the time of conversion.     

Improvement in renal function in kidney transplant recipients switched from cyclosporine or tacrolimus to belatacept: 2-year results from the long-term extension of a phase II study

Kidney transplant recipients who switched from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept demonstrated higher calculated glomerular filtration rates (cGFRs) at 1 year in a Phase II study. This report addresses whether improvement was sustained at 2 years in the long‐term extension (LTE). Patients receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus were randomized to switch to belatacept or continue CNI. Of 173 randomized patients, 162 completed the 12‐month main study and entered the LTE. Two patients (n = 1 each group) had graft loss between Years 1–2. At Year 2, mean cGFR was 62.0 ml/min (belatacept) vs. 55.4 ml/min (CNI). The mean change in cGFR from baseline was +8.8 ml/min (belatacept) and +0.3 ml/min (CNI). Higher cGFR was observed in patients switched from either cyclosporine (+7.8 ml/min) or tacrolimus (+8.9 ml/min). The frequency of acute rejection in the LTE cohort was comparable between the belatacept and CNI groups by Year 2. All acute rejection episodes occurred during Year 1 in the belatacept patients and during Year 2 in the CNI group. There were more non‐serious mucocutaneous fungal infections in the belatacept group. Switching to a belatacept‐based regimen from a CNI‐based regimen resulted in a continued trend toward improved renal function at 2 years after switching.     

Immunosuppression with Belatacept‐Based,Corticosteroid‐Avoiding Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Current immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation typically include calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, both of which have toxicities that can impair recipient and allograft health. This 1‐year, randomized, controlled, open‐label, exploratory study assessed two belatacept‐based regimens compared to a tacrolimus (TAC)‐based, steroid‐avoiding regimen. Recipients of living and deceased donor renal allografts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive belatacept‐mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), belatacept‐sirolimus (SRL), or TAC‐MMF. All patients received induction with 4 doses of Thymoglobulin (6 mg/kg maximum) and an associated short course of corticosteroids. Eighty‐nine patients were randomized and transplanted. Acute rejection occurred in 4, 1 and 1 patient in the belatacept‐MMF, belatacept‐SRL and TAC‐MMF groups, respectively, by Month 6; most acute rejection occurred in the first 3 months. More than two‐thirds of patients in the belatacept groups remained on CNI‐ and steroid‐free regimens at 12 months and the calculated glomerular filtration rate was 8–10 mL/min higher with either belatacept regimen than with TAC‐MMF. Overall safety was comparable between groups. In conclusion, primary immunosuppression with belatacept may enable the simultaneous avoidance of both CNIs and corticosteroids in recipients of living and deceased standard criteria donor kidneys, with acceptable rates of acute rejection and improved renal function relative to a TAC‐based regimen.     

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor–based immunosuppression to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors or belatacept in renal transplant recipients

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) remain the standard of care for maintenance immunosuppression following renal transplantation. CNIs have demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing acute cellular rejection; however, some evidence suggests that these compounds negatively affect native renal function and are associated with allograft injury in renal transplant recipients. CNIs have also been linked with hypertension, new‐onset diabetes after transplantation, tremor, and thrombotic microangiopathy, which have significant consequences for long‐term allograft function and patient health overall. Thus, converting patients to a non‐CNI‐based regimen may improve renal function and also provide extrarenal benefits. A number of studies have been conducted that explore CNI conversion strategies in renal transplant recipients in an effort to improve long‐term allograft function and survival. These include converting to alternative, non‐nephrotoxic, maintenance immunosuppressants, such as the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) and the costimulation blocker belatacept. In this review of literature, evidence for the potential renal and extrarenal benefits of conversion to these non‐CNI‐based regimens is evaluated. Clinical challenges, including the adverse event profiles of non‐CNI‐based regimens and the selection of candidates for conversion, are also examined.     

Belatacept Combined With Transient Calcineurin Inhibitor Therapy Prevents Rejection and Promotes Improved Long‐Term Renal Allograft Function

Belatacept, a T cell costimulation blocker, demonstrated superior renal function, lower cardiovascular risk, and improved graft and patient survival in renal transplant recipients. Despite the potential benefits, adoption of belatacept has been limited in part due to concerns regarding higher rates and grades of acute rejection in clinical trials. Since July 2011, we have utilized belatacept‐based immunosuppression regimens in clinical practice. In this retrospective analysis of 745 patients undergoing renal transplantation at our center, we compared patients treated with belatacept (n = 535) with a historical cohort receiving a tacrolimus‐based protocol (n = 205). Patient and graft survival were equivalent for all groups. An increased rate of acute rejection was observed in an initial cohort treated with a protocol similar to the low‐intensity regimen from the BENEFIT trial versus the historical tacrolimus group (50.5% vs. 20.5%). The addition of a transient course of tacrolimus reduced rejection rates to acceptable levels (16%). Treatment with belatacept was associated with superior estimated GFR (belatacept 63.8 mL/min vs. tacrolimus 46.2 mL/min at 4 years, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in serious infections including rates of cytomegalovirus or BK viremia. We describe the development of a costimulatory blockade‐based strategy that ultimately allows renal transplant recipients to achieve calcineurin inhibitor–free immunosuppression.     

Belatacept and Sirolimus Prolong Nonhuman Primate Islet Allograft Survival: Adverse Consequences of Concomitant Alefacept Therapy

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and steroids are known to promote insulin resistance, and their avoidance after islet transplantation is preferred from a metabolic standpoint. Belatacept, a B7‐specific mediator of costimulation blockade (CoB), is clinically indicated as a CNI alternative in renal transplantation, and we have endeavored to develop a clinically translatable, belatacept‐based regimen that could obviate the need for both CNIs and steroids. Based on the known synergy between CoB and mTOR inhibition, we studied rhesus monkeys undergoing MHC‐mismatched islet allotransplants treated with belatacept and the mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus. To extend prior work on CoB‐resistant rejection, some animals also received CD2 blockade with alefacept (LFA3‐Ig). Nine rhesus macaques were rendered diabetic with streptozotocin and underwent islet allotransplantation. All received belatacept and sirolimus; six also received alefacept. Belatacept and sirolimus significantly prolonged rejection‐free graft survival (median 225 days compared to 8 days in controls receiving basiliximab and sirolimus; p = 0.022). The addition of alefacept provided no additional survival benefit, but was associated with Cytomegalovirus reactivation in four of six animals. No recipients produced donor‐specific alloantibodies. The combination of belatacept and sirolimus successfully prevents islet allograft survival in rhesus monkeys, but induction with alefacept provides no survival benefit and increases the risk of viral reactivation.     

Experience with belatacept rescue therapy in kidney transplant recipients

In kidney transplant recipients with chronic graft dysfunction, long‐term immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) or mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) can be challenging due to adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity and proteinuria. Seventy‐nine kidney transplant recipients treated with CNI‐based or mTORi‐based maintenance immunosuppression who had CNI‐induced nephrotoxicity or severe adverse events were switched to belatacept. Mean time from transplantation to belatacept conversion was 69.0 months. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ± standard deviation at baseline was 26.1 ± 15.0 ml/min/1.73 m², increasing to 34.0 ± 15.2 ml/min/1.73 m² at 12 months postconversion (P < 0.0005). Renal function improvements were also seen in patients with low eGFR (<25 ml/min/1.73 m²) or high proteinuria (>500 mg/l) at conversion. The Kaplan–Meier estimates for patient and graft survival at 12 months were 95.0% and 85.6%, respectively. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 7.9%. One case of post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder occurred at 17 months postconversion. For comparison, a historical control group of 41 patients converted to mTORi‐based immunosuppression because of biopsy‐confirmed CNI‐induced toxicity was examined; eGFR increased from 27.6 ± 7.2 ml/min/1.73 m² at baseline to 31.1 ± 11.9 ml/min/1.73 m² at 12 months (P = 0.018). Belatacept‐based immunosuppression may be an alternative regimen for kidney transplant recipients with CNI‐ or mTORi‐induced toxicity.     

Effect of an Early Switch to Belatacept Among Calcineurin Inhibitor–Intolerant Graft Recipients of Kidneys From Extended‐Criteria Donors

Transplant recipients receiving a kidney from an extended‐criteria donor (ECD) are exposed to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity, as demonstrated by severe delayed graft function and/or a low GFR. Belatacept is a nonnephrotoxic drug that is indicated as an alternative to CNIs. We reported 25 cases of conversion from a CNI to belatacept due to CNI intolerance within the first 6 mo after transplantation. The mean age of the recipients was 59 years, and 24 of 25 patients received ECD kidneys. At the date of the medication switch, 12 of 25 patients displayed a calculated GFR (cGFR) <15 mL/min, six patients remained on dialysis, and the biopsies showed evidence of acute tubular damage associated with severe vascular or tubulointerstitial chronic lesions. Three patients did not recover renal function, and three patients died during the follow‐up period. Among the remaining patients, renal function improved: The cGFR was 18.28 ± 12.3 mL/min before the medication switch compared with 34.9 ± 14.5 mL/min at 1 year after conversion to belatacept (p = 0.002). Tolerance of and compliance with belatacept were good, and only one patient experienced acute rejection. Belatacept is an effective therapy that preserves renal function in kidney transplant patients who are intolerant of CNIs.     

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization,Conversion, Withdrawal,and Avoidance Strategies in Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Despite their clinical efficacy, concerns about calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity make alternative regimens that reduce CNI exposure attractive for renal transplant recipients. In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, we assessed four CNI immunosuppression strategies (minimization, conversion, withdrawal, and avoidance) designed to reduce CNI exposure and assessed the impact of each on patient and allograft survival, acute rejection and renal function. We evaluated 92 comparisons from 88 randomized controlled trials and found moderate‐ to high‐strength evidence suggesting that minimization strategies result in better clinical outcomes compared with standard‐dose regimens; moderate‐strength evidence indicating that conversion to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or belatacept was associated with improved renal function but increased rejection risk; and moderate‐ to high‐strength evidence suggesting planned CNI withdrawal could result in improved renal function despite an association with increased rejection risk. The evidence base for avoidance studies was insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions. The applicability of the review is limited by the large number of studies examining cyclosporine‐based strategies and low‐risk populations. Additional research is needed with tacrolimus‐based regimens and higher risk populations. Moreover, research is necessary to clarify the effect of induction and adjunctive agents in alternative immunosuppression strategies and should include more comprehensive and consistent reporting of patient‐centered outcomes.     

Complete Regression of Psoriatic Arthritis After Belatacept Conversion in a Highly HLA‐Sensitized Kidney Transplant Patient

Costimulatory inhibitors (i.e. abatacept and belatacept) effectively abrogate T lymphocyte activation and proliferation and have been shown to be effective for disease control in certain autoimmune disorders as well as in preventing allograft rejection in kidney transplantation. Whether such immunomodulatory agents may be useful for the control of autoimmune flares and allograft acceptance, while avoiding the need of additional strong immunosuppressants, has not been shown. Here, we report the first case of a 47‐year‐old man affected by a serious debilitating form of psoriatic arthritis that presented during the course of a third, high immunological‐risk kidney transplantation. Three years after transplantation, the patient benefited by switching from tacrolimus‐ to belatacept‐based therapy, without additional immunosuppression, by showing complete regression of the arthritic symptoms as well as no progression of severe radiological lesions, which leaded to the recovery of disability and functional impairment. Remarkably, the treatment with belatacept in association with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids also provided a stable normal allograft function over time and abrogated the development of de novo circulating donor‐specific alloantibodies after 4 years of follow‐up.     

Challenges of calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal following combined pancreas and kidney transplantation: Results of a prospective,randomized clinical trial

In a phase 2 multicenter open‐label randomized trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, simultaneous pancreas‐kidney (SPK) recipients were randomized to a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)–based immunosuppressive regimen (tacrolimus) (n = 21), or an investigational arm using low‐dose CNI plus costimulation blockade (belatacept) with intended CNI withdrawal (n = 22). Both arms included induction therapy with rabbit ATG, mycophenolate sodium, or mycophenolate mofetil and rapid withdrawal of steroids. Enrollment and CNI withdrawal were stopped after 43/60 planned subjects had been enrolled. At that time, the rate of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) of the pancreas was low in both groups until CNI was withdrawn, with four of the five pancreas rejections occurring during or after CNI withdrawal. The rate of BPAR of kidney allografts was low in both control (9.5%) and investigational (9.1%) arms. Pancreas graft survival at 52 weeks, defined by insulin independence, was 21 (100%) in the control group and 19 (86%) in the investigational arm. One subject in the investigational arm died with functioning pancreas and kidney grafts. Renal function at week 52 was similar in both arms. Costimulation blockade with belatacept did not provide sufficient immunosuppression to reliably prevent pancreas rejection in SPK transplants undergoing CNI withdrawal.     

Corticosteroids and methotrexate as adjuvants to costimulation blockade in non‐human primate renal transplantation

Belatacept, the CD28‐B7 costimulation pathway inhibitor, has been approved as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) alternative in kidney transplantation. Although costimulation blockade (CoB) allows for CNI avoidance, it is associated with increased rates of early rejection, prompting a search for agents to pair with belatacept. Methotrexate (MTX) is an antimetabolite that has been found to be complimentary with abatacept, a lower affinity CD28‐B7‐specific analogue of belatacept, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined whether this synergy would extend to prevention of kidney allograft rejection. Rhesus macaques underwent kidney transplantation treated with abatacept maintenance therapy with either a steroid taper, MTX, or both. The combination of abatacept maintenance with steroids prolonged graft survival compared to untreated historical controls and previous reports of abatacept monotherapy. The addition of MTX did not provide additional benefit. These data demonstrate that abatacept with adjuvant therapy may delay the onset of acute rejection, but fail to show synergy between abatacept and MTX beyond that of steroids. These findings indicate that MTX is unlikely to be a suitable adjuvant to CoB in kidney transplantation, but also suggest that with further modification, a CoB regimen used for advanced RA may suffice for RA patients requiring kidney transplantation.     

De Novo Belatacept in a Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Positive Kidney Transplant Recipient

Benefits of belatacept‐based immunosuppressive regimens in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–positive renal transplant recipients include avoidance of drug interactions between calcineurin inhibitors and highly active antiretroviral agents and decreased likelihood or severity of nonimmune toxicities such as new‐onset diabetes after transplant, hyperlipidemia and hypertension. We report a successful case of de novo belatacept at >18 mo from transplant in an HIV‐positive black man aged 50 years who received his first transplant from a living related kidney donor. To our knowledge, this case is the first reported of belatacept use in an HIV‐positive renal transplant recipient.     

Association Between Calcineurin Inhibitor Treatment and Peripheral Nerve Dysfunction in Renal Transplant Recipients

Neurotoxicity is a significant clinical side effect of immunosuppressive treatment used in prophylaxis for rejection in solid organ transplants. This study aimed to provide insights into the mechanisms underlying neurotoxicity in patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment following renal transplantation. Clinical and neurophysiological assessments were undertaken in 38 patients receiving immunosuppression following renal transplantation, 19 receiving calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy and 19 receiving a calcineurin‐free (CNI‐free) regimen. Groups were matched for age, gender, time since transplant and renal function and compared to normal controls (n = 20). The CNI group demonstrated marked differences in nerve excitability parameters, suggestive of nerve membrane depolarization (p < 0.05). Importantly, there were no differences between the two CNIs (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus). In contrast, CNI‐free patients showed no differences to normal controls. The CNI‐treated patients had a higher prevalence of clinical neuropathy and higher neuropathy severity scores. Longitudinal studies were undertaken in a cohort of subjects within 12 months of transplantation (n = 10). These studies demonstrated persistence of abnormalities in patients maintained on CNI‐treatment and improvement noted in those who were switched to a CNI‐free regimen. The results of this study have significant implications for selection, or continuation, of immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients, especially those with pre‐existing neurological disability.     

ASP2409, A Next‐Generation CTLA4‐Ig,Versus Belatacept in Renal Allograft Survival in Cynomolgus Monkeys

Belatacept is the first costimulatory blockade agent approved for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. Clinical results have indicated that belatacept is associated with superior renal function and improved metabolic profile; however, higher incidence of acute rejection and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder are the shortcomings of this agent. In this study, ASP2409, a new cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte associated protein 4‐immunoglobulin possessing 14‐fold higher in vitro CD86 binding affinity than belatacept, was tested for renal allograft survival in cynomolgus monkeys. ASP2409 monotherapy dose‐dependently prolonged renal allograft survival. Low‐dose ASP2409 in combination with a subtherapeutic dose of tacrolimus showed much longer median survival time than monotherapy. Similar allograft survival results were observed in regimens based on high‐dose ASP2409, belatacept, and therapeutic‐dose tacrolimus. The results of renal allograft histopathology with high‐dose ASP2409‐based regimens were not inferior to the belatacept‐based regimen. Moreover, higher frequencies of FoxP3‐positive regulatory T cells in renal allografts were observed in ASP2409‐ and belatacept‐based regimens compared with tacrolimus‐based regimens. No serious side effects related to ASP2409 administration were found during the study. These data suggest that ASP2409 is a promising candidate for calcineurin inhibitor‐sparing or ‐avoidance regimens.     

Selective Targeting of High‐Affinity LFA‐1 Does Not Augment Costimulation Blockade in a Nonhuman Primate Renal Transplantation Model

Costimulation blockade (CoB) via belatacept is a lower‐morbidity alternative to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐based immunosuppression. However, it has higher rates of early acute rejection. These early rejections are mediated in part by memory T cells, which have reduced dependence on the pathway targeted by belatacept and increased adhesion molecule expression. One such molecule is leukocyte function antigen (LFA)‐1. LFA‐1 exists in two forms: a commonly expressed, low‐affinity form and a transient, high‐affinity form, expressed only during activation. We have shown that antibodies reactive with LFA‐1 regardless of its configuration are effective in eliminating memory T cells but at the cost of impaired protective immunity. Here we test two novel agents, leukotoxin A and AL‐579, each of which targets the high‐affinity form of LFA‐1, to determine whether this more precise targeting prevents belatacept‐resistant rejection. Despite evidence of ex vivo and in vivo ligand‐specific activity, neither agent when combined with belatacept proved superior to belatacept monotherapy. Leukotoxin A approached a ceiling of toxicity before efficacy, while AL‐579 failed to significantly alter the peripheral immune response. These data, and prior studies, suggest that LFA‐1 blockade may not be a suitable adjuvant agent for CoB‐resistant rejection.     

The impact of belatacept on third‐party HLA alloantibodies in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients

Recent evidence suggests that belatacept reduces the durability of preexisting antibodies to class I and class II human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). In this case series of 163 highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates whose calculated panel‐reactive antibody (cPRA) activity was ≥98% to 100%, the impact of belatacept on preexisting HLA antibodies was assessed. Of the 163 candidates, 72 underwent transplantation between December 4, 2014 and April 15, 2017; 60 of these transplanted patients remained on belatacept consecutively for at least 6 months. We observed a decrease in the breadth and/or strength of HLA class I antibodies as assessed by FlowPRA in belatacept‐treated patients compared to controls who did not receive belatacept. Specifically, significant HLA antibody reduction was evident for class I (P < .0009). Posttransplant belatacept‐treated patients also had a clinically significant reduction in their cPRA compared to controls (P < .01). Collectively, these findings suggest belatacept can reduce HLA class I antibodies in a significant proportion of highly sensitized recipients and could be an option to improve pretransplant compatibility with organ donors.