Hairdressers with dermatitis should always be patch tested regardless of atopy status

Background: Allergic contact dermatitis is common in hairdressers because of their exposure to chemicals used in hair dyes and permanent wave solutions. Atopic individuals are known to have a higher prevalence of leaving the profession due to morbidity associated with hand eczema. Objectives: To assess which chemicals are responsible for allergic contact dermatitis in hairdressers and whether the prevalence is the same according to atopy status. Methods: A total of 729 hairdressers who had been patch tested were retrospectively identified. Allergic reactions to relevant allergens from the extended European baseline series and hairdressing series were analysed against history of atopic eczema. Results: Of the total, 29.9% of patients had a current or past history of atopic eczema. The most frequent positive allergens from the European baseline series were nickel sulfate (32.1%) and p‐phenylenediamine (19.0%) and from the hairdressing series were glyceryl monothioglycolate (21.4%) and ammonium persulfate (10.6%). There was no significant difference between people with or without a history of atopic eczema, except for fragrance mix I and nickel sulfate. Conclusions: We present findings from the largest cohort of hairdressers patch tested from a single centre. It is necessary to patch test hairdressers with dermatitis, regardless of a history of atopy. Strategies to reduce prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis are required.     

A quantification of occupational skin exposures and the use of protective gloves among hairdressers in Denmark

Background. Occupational hand eczema is common in hairdressers, owing to excessive exposure to wet work and hairdressing chemicals. Objectives. To quantify occupational skin exposure and the use of protective gloves among hairdressers in Denmark. Methods. A register‐based study was conducted comprising all graduates from hairdressing vocational schools from 1985 to 2007 (n = 7840). The participants received a self‐administered postal questionnaire in May 2009, including questions on hairdressing tasks performed in the past week at work and the extent of glove use. A response rate of 67.9% (n = 5324) was obtained. Results. Of the respondents, 55.7% still worked as hairdressers, and they formed the basis of this study. Daily wet work was excessive; 86.6% had wet hands for ≥2 hr, and 54% for ≥ 4 hr. Glove use was fairly frequent for full head hair colouring and bleaching procedures (93–97.7%), but less frequent for highlighting/lowlighting procedures (49.7–60.5%) and permanent waving (28.3%). Gloves were rarely worn during hair washing (10%), although this was more frequently the case after hair colouring procedures (48.9%). Conclusions. Occupational skin exposure was excessive among hairdressers; the extent of wet work and chemical treatments was high, and glove use was inconsistent, especially for certain hair colouring procedures and wet work tasks.     

What do trainee hairdressers know about hand dermatitis?

Hand dermatitis is an important cause of morbidity in hairdressers. We conducted a questionnaire survey of 121 trainee hairdressers from 2 hairdressing colleges in Burnley (UK). The questionnaire concerned the number and types of hairdressing procedures performed, previous and current medical history, awareness of risks to the skin from hairdressing, and knowledge of hand dermatitis prevention. 17% of the trainees suffered currently from hand dermatitis. This is likely to be due to the large amount of wet work done by apprentice hairdressers, particularly those who worked in salons. 2/3 of trainees were not aware that atopic eczema predisposed to hand dermatitis. Formal pre-school and pre-employment counselling was limited. Knowledge on hand care among trainees was not often translated into practice, with gloves being worn by only 9% when shampooing and 58% when perming. Prevention of hand dermatitis by education and pre-employment counselling is of fundamental importance.     

Job change facilitates healing in a cohort of patients with occupational hand eczema

Occupational hand eczema is a type of eczema specifically affecting the hands and caused by a person's work. It often affects people whose hands get wet a lot or are exposed to chemicals when working, such as hairdressers and cleaners. It can cause a great deal of distress to people, affecting their health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and often meaning they have to leave work or change jobs. It is a major reason for people seeking disability benefit in countries including the UK, so as well as having a negative impact on the patient, it also impacts on society more widely. In theory, occupational hand eczema should heal when the exposure is removed; however, several studies have shown that this is unfortunately not the case in reality, and some patients may continue to have severe hand eczema symptoms. This study involved 1496 people who were suffering from occupational hand eczema in Denmark in 2010 and 2011, who then completed a questionnaire 5 years later, asking questions about their job, their eczema and their quality of life. 48.7% were still in the same profession, 32.6% had changed profession and 18.8% were not working (outside the labour market, e.g. retired, unemployed, on parental leave). Healing of hand eczema (meaning their hands were now clear of eczema) was reported by 19.5% of the participants who changed their profession and 27.3% of the participants who outside the labour market, compared with 15.8% of those still in the same profession. Looking at improvement (but not healing) of their eczema, 64.9% of the participants who had changed profession and 58.2% of the participants outside the labour market reported improvement in their hand eczema compared with 53.1% of the participants still in the same profession. However, health related quality of life was not improved by changing jobs or leaving work, and in fact worsened. Also, the authors did not ask if the participants changed to a profession with more or less exposure than the previous profession, so it is possible that some participants have changed to another high risk profession, thereby diminishing the effect of change. These two points both need further research.     

Validation of self-reporting of hand eczema among Danish hairdressing apprentices

Background. Hairdressing apprentices have a high incidence of hand eczema. Most studies use self‐reported hand eczema as a cost‐effective method to estimate the prevalence of hand eczema. No validation studies on self‐reported hand eczema among hairdressing apprentices exist. Objectives. To evaluate the validity of self‐reporting of hand eczema among Danish hairdressing apprentices. Methods. During their first 2 weeks of training, 502 hairdressing apprentices were enrolled in this study. All apprentices completed a self‐administered questionnaire including questions regarding, for example, current hand eczema, and they were all clinically examined for hand eczema three times during the first part of their education by use of the Hand Eczema Severity Index. The validity of self‐reporting of hand eczema was measured with the clinical examination as the gold standard. Results. The sensitivity of self‐reporting of hand eczema was 70.3%, and the specificity was 99.8%. The positive predictive value was 96.3%, and the negative predictive value was 98.5%. Conclusions. We found good agreement between self‐reporting of hand eczema and clinical examination. There was good sensitivity and high specificity. Self‐reporting of hand eczema among hairdressing apprentices is considered to be a valid method for estimating the prevalence of hand eczema, although it might underestimate the true prevalence.     

Healthy worker effect in hairdressing apprentices

Background. Hairdressers and hairdressing apprentices have a high incidence of occupational hand eczema, owing to excessive wet work and exposure to chemical substances. Hairdressing apprentices, in particular, seem to be at high risk of developing hand eczema. Previous hand eczema and atopic dermatitis are known risk factors for the development of hand eczema in wet work occupations. Objectives. To estimate the prevalence of hand eczema, eczema on wrists or forearms and atopic dermatitis in a cohort of hairdressing apprentices at the start of their education, and subsequently evaluate any potential healthy worker effect. Methods. During the first 2 weeks of training, 382 hairdressing apprentices were enrolled in this study. All apprentices completed a self‐administered questionnaire, including previously validated questions regarding, for example, previous and present hand eczema, eczema on the wrists or forearms, and atopic dermatitis. For comparison, the questionnaire was sent to a control group matched for age, gender and city code from the general population (n = 1870). Results. Response rates were 99.7% for the hairdressing apprentices (mean age 17.5 years, range 15–39 years, 96.3% females) and 68.3% for the control group (mean age 17.4 years, range 15–39 years, 96.8% females). Previous or present hand eczema were reported by 8.0% of hairdressing apprentices and by 12.5% of the matched control group (p = 0.009), and eczema on the wrists or forearms was reported by 5.3% of the apprentices and by 11.9% of the controls (p < 0.001). We classified 21.4% of the hairdressing apprentices as having atopic dermatitis versus 29.8% of the matched control group (p = 0.001). Conclusions. These results indicate a healthy worker effect, as there was a lower reported incidence of hand eczema and eczema on wrists or forearms, and there were fewer cases classified as having atopic dermatitis, among hairdressing apprentices than in a matched control group from the general population.     

Do hairdressers in Denmark have their hand eczema reported as an occupational disease? Results from a register‐based questionnaire study

Background. Occupational hand eczema is common in hairdressers, owing to wet work and chemicals. Objectives. To estimate whether hairdressers in Denmark have their hand eczema reported as an occupational disease and to clarify the reasons for not reporting. Methods. A register‐based study was performed, comprising trained hairdressers (n = 7840), using a self‐administered postal questionnaire including questions on hand eczema and it being reported as an occupational disease. A response rate of 67.9% (n = 5324) was obtained. Results. Overall, 2186 respondents ever had hand eczema; 71.3% were apprentices at the time of hand eczema onset. The majority (61.9%) had had hand eczema several times and 21.3% (almost) all of the time, but only 20.7% had reported their hand eczema as being occupational to the National Board of Industrial Injuries (Denmark). A positive association between severity of hand eczema and filing a report was found (odds ratio 19.2; 95% confidence interval 8.18–45.06). The main reasons for not reporting were ‘I thought it would eventually get better’ (40.4%) and ‘My doctor didn't tell me it was possible to report it' (26.6%). Conclusions. Hand eczema is considerably under‐reported as an occupational disease; the perception of hand eczema among hairdressers and the lack of reporting from doctors are the main reasons for this.     

Development of hand eczema in junior hairdressers: an 8-year follow-up study

The development of hand eczema was evaluated in an 8-year follow-up study carried out in 51 junior hairdressers. Predisposing factors were investigated, Data were collected by use of u sell-administered questionnaire: 74% response. None of the junior hairdressers presented wild hand eczema at the start of the survey. After 8 years, however, 51% had developed hand eczema. No significant difference in prevalence of hand eczema was found between practicing and non-practicing hairdressers (58% versus 33%). Development of hand eczema was not related 10 atopic constitution or nickel sensitivity. Dry skin type was associated with increased risk of developing hand eczema.     

Nickel allergy and atopy in hairdressers

A study of 35 hairdressers with hand eczema was made during an 18-month period. A total of 29 were test-positive to one or more substances in the standard series and/or to products from their working environment. 40% were allergic to nickel. The prevalence of personal atopy was higher in the nickel-negative than in the nickel-positive. Immunoglobulin E determination was not of assistance in attempts to differentiate between nickel-positive and nickel-negative hairdressers. In 72% the eczema had started before the age of 25 and in 23% after less than 1 year in the profession. The desire is expressed that all hairdressing products shall be labelled in respect to allergen contents, since 46% of the hairdressers reacted to one or more such agents.     

Prevalence of atopy in a population of hairdressing students and practising hairdressers in Melbourne, Australia

Hairdressers are one of the largest groups affected by occupational contact dermatitis. In this population-based study, 193 trainee hairdressers and 184 practising hairdressers each completed a questionnaire and had their hands examined. Participants were asked about past or present atopy including eczema, asthma or hayfever, which occurred in 59.2%, and were individually correlated with a history of occupational skin problems. Almost 60% of hairdressers and trainees had experienced changes on their hands since commencing hairdressing, while 29% had evidence of abnormal skin on examination on the day of participation. Atopic individuals, who plan to work in a career such as hairdressing with known high rates of occupational contact dermatitis, should be advised to care for and protect their skin from the outset to prevent the development of this condition. There has been little awareness of this issue in Australia, despite longstanding knowledge of the association of hairdressing and contact dermatitis.     

Sensitization in atopic and non-atopic hairdressers with hand eczema

To investigate the capability of atopics to be sensitized to contort allergens, 143 hairdressers With hand eczema, who had been patch tested with The hairdresser's series, were studied. The 125 women and 18 men were grouped according to their personal atopic Status. There were 45 eczematous atopics, 32 mucous membrane atopics and 66 non-atopics, Sensitization to at least one of the hairdressing chemicals was found in 60% of the eczematous atopics, 53% of the mucous membrane atopics and 58% of the non-atopics The commonest sensitizer in each group was glyceryl monothioglycolate followed by para-phenylenediamine and related dyes. None of the 18 men were allergic to nickel but 40% of the women were thus sensitized. Jewelry rather than equipment was thought to be the cause No significant difference was found between the eczematous atopics, mucous membrane atopics and non-atopics in their capacity to be sensitized to hairdressing allergens or to nickel.     

Hand eczema among Hong Kong nurses: a self-report questionnaire survey conducted in a regional hospital

Background. Hand eczema is common in the nursing profession, and has been reported widely in various parts of the world. Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and severity of hand eczema among nurses working in a regional hospital in Hong Kong, as well as its psychosocial impact and any possible associated risk factors. Patients/materials/methods. The study took the form of a self‐report questionnaire survey; 1240 nurses in a regional hospital were asked to participate in the survey by completing the questionnaire and returning it anonymously within 2 weeks. Results. Seven hundred and twenty‐four nurses returned the questionnaire (a response rate of 59%). The prevalence of hand eczema among the respondents was 22.1% (160/724). More than 90% had moderate to severe hand eczema. Itchiness and dryness were the most common symptoms. Occupational work, housework, mood, social activities and sleep were particularly affected. Multinomial logistic regressions showed that a personal or family history of atopy and a hand washing frequency of >20 times per day were independent risk factors for hand eczema. Conclusions. Hand eczema is common and severe among Hong Kong nurses. The results of this study suggest that hand eczema is an important problem for nurses and that preventive measures should be emphasized.     

Nickel allergy as risk factor for hand eczema: a population-based study

Summary Background In population‐based studies using self‐reported nickel allergy, a hand eczema prevalence of 30–43% has been reported in individuals with nickel allergy. In a previous Swedish study, 958 schoolgirls were patch tested for nickel. In a questionnaire follow up 20 years later no association was found between nickel allergy and hand eczema. Objectives To investigate further the relation between nickel allergy and hand eczema. Methods Three hundred and sixty‐nine women, still living in the same geographical area, now aged 30–40 years, were patch tested and clinically investigated regarding hand eczema. Results Patch testing showed 30·1% nickel‐positive individuals. The adjusted prevalence proportion ratio (PPR) for hand eczema after age 15 years in relation to nickel patch test results was 1·03 (95% confidence interval, CI 0·71–1·50). A history of childhood eczema was reported by 35·9%, and the PPR for hand eczema in relation to childhood eczema was 3·68 (95% CI 2·45–5·54). When analysing the relation separately in women with and without a history of childhood eczema a statistical interaction was found. The hand eczema risk was doubled in nickel‐positive women without a history of childhood eczema, with a PPR of 2·23 (95% CI 1·10–4·49) for hand eczema after age 15 years. Conclusions A doubled risk for hand eczema was found in nickel‐positive women without a history of childhood eczema. When analysing all participants, there was no statistically significant difference between nickel‐positive and nickel‐negative women regarding occurrence of hand eczema. The most important risk factor for hand eczema was childhood eczema. The risk for hand eczema in nickel‐positive women may previously have been overestimated.     

Association between non‐atopic hand eczema and interleukin‐13 gene polymorphism in Taiwanese nursing population

Chronic hand eczema is an important occupational skin disease with atopic dermatitis (AD) and wet work being the most important risk factors. This study was launched to analyse the potential association between AD‐related inflammation genes and development of non‐atopic hand eczema among nurses in University Hospital. Atopic eczema, non‐atopic hand dermatitis and control groups were identified. The association between occurrence of non‐atopic hand eczema and interleukin (IL)‐13, IL‐4 and IL‐5 gene variants was analysed. IL13 rs20541 A allele [assuming recessive model; odds ratio (OR) = 3.38, 95% CI: (1.63–7.00)] showed association with development of non‐atopic hand eczema. Additive score analyses showed combination of this gene variant with previously identified risk factors including certain SPINK5 polymorphism and more than 10 years of work experience conferred highest risk for development of non‐atopic hand eczema. As non‐atopic hand eczema made up significant portion of occupational skin diseases, further studies should be focused on this commonly encountered skin condition.     

A 7‐step consultation plan for health care workers and hairdressers

Background: Skin diseases are among the most common occupational disor‐ders in health care workers and hairdressers. Optimal prevention methods make it possible for more individuals to remain active in their profession. We devised a 7‐step consultation plan which was employed in a standard fashion and then evaluated. Patients and Methods: 264 employes were evaluated in the Education and Support Center of the German Accident Prevention and Insurance Association in the Health and Welfare Services (BGW schu.ber.z Berlin) from 2003 to 2005 in a standardized manner. Included were detailed history, physical examination, skin physiology measurements (transepidermal water loss, corneometry, sebumetry) and then making a diagnosis and therapeutic recommendations. Results: Within the study group of 264 employes the most frequent diagnosis were toxic‐irritant hand eczema (28.4%), allergic contact eczema (19.7%), atopic eczema (15.5%) and irritant contact eczema with atopic diathesis (13.6%). The frequency of contact sensitivity was high in the study group (80.7%). The skin physiological parameters were not remarkably altered and did not differ between individuals with an atopic diathesis versus without an atopic diathesis. Conclusion: This standardized protocol for a “7‐step consultation plan”when applied in a standardized manner offers quality‐controlled but also individually‐adapted support considering dermatological, educational and occupational aspects. Skin physiology parameters did not provide any further information indicating the need of the development of novel techniques to measure skin barrier function.     

Tobacco smoking and hand eczema: a population‐based study

Background Tobacco smoking has been proposed to promote hand eczema. Objectives To examine the association between tobacco smoking and hand eczema and to investigate a possible dose‐response relation. Methods A national environmental health survey was performed in 2007. A questionnaire was mailed to 43 905 individuals and responses were obtained from 25 851 (59%). Questions on 1‐year prevalence of hand eczema and on previous and current smoking were included. Respondents were asked to report number of cigarettes per day and to provide information on history of atopy and frequency of hand exposure to water. Results In total, answers regarding smoking and hand eczema were obtained from 25 428 individuals. Of regular daily smokers, 10·0% reported hand eczema vs. 9·1% of nonsmokers (P = 0·0951). A history of atopy showed the strongest influence on the occurrence of hand eczema: prevalence proportion ratio (PPR) 3·46. The PPR for hand eczema among individuals smoking > 15 cigarettes per day was 1·25 and 1·40 in uni‐ and multivariate analysis, respectively. Age, history of atopy, sex and water exposure were found to be confounders but not effect modifiers. A dose‐response relation between level of smoking and 1‐year prevalence of hand eczema was revealed with a PPR of 1·05 (P < 0·001) for the continuous variable of smoking habits, indicating a significantly increased prevalence of hand eczema among individuals with higher consumption of tobacco. Conclusions An association between heavy smoking and hand eczema was confirmed. It is important to consider the level of exposure, as a dose‐response relation was revealed, and to be aware of confounding factors.     

A survey of occupational hand eczema in Denmark

Occupational hand eczema (OHE) is the most frequently recognized work-related disease in Denmark and the annual cost to society is high. Understanding of the epidemiology of OHE is essential to be able to give appropriate recommendations for its prevention. The study comprised 758 persons, 490 females and 268 males with recognized OHE in the period October 2001 to November 2002. Data were obtained prospectively from the National Board of Industrial Industry Registry and from a self-administered questionnaire (response rate, 82%). The most frequently recognized diagnosis was irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), mainly caused by wet occupations. The proportion of occupational ICD was equal for males and females, 59.7% and 63.1%, respectively. The estimated rates of OHE were high for bakers, hairdressers and dental surgery assistants, and a high proportion of apprentices were found among hairdressers. The prevalence of atopic dermatitis was low (16.4%) compared to previous studies among hand eczema patients. The prevalence of occupational allergic contact dermatitis in the study population was substantially higher among males than females, and the most frequent causes among males were allergy to chromium (leather exposure), rubber additives (gloves) and nickel due to exposure from work tools and metalworking industry.     

Fifteen-year follow-up of hand eczema: persistence and consequences

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is a skin disease often with a long-lasting and relapsing course. The long-term prognosis in the general population is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aims were to examine the extent to which hand eczema had persisted and the medicosocial consequences of the disease. METHODS: In a 15-year follow-up of hand eczema, patients diagnosed in a previous population-based study were sent a questionnaire with 20 questions concerning the persistence and course of the disease, and its occupational and medicosocial consequences. RESULTS: Addresses were available for 1115 persons, of whom 868 answered the questionnaire. Sixty-six per cent of the respondents reported periods of hand eczema and 44% reported symptoms during the previous year, with no sex difference. Twelve per cent reported continuous eczema. However, 74% of those reporting symptoms considered that their hand eczema had improved; of these more were women than men (78% vs. 66%, P < 0.01). Twenty people, 3% of those who were gainfully employed in 1983, reported a change to another occupation because of their hand eczema, 15 of these reporting improvement after the job change. A considerable need for medical consultation was reported, as was the influence on psychosocial functions among those who had eczema the previous year, e.g. sleep disturbances (36%) and hampered leisure activities (72%). Job changes related to hand eczema and psychosocial impairment were also reported by individuals who had not sought medical help for their hand eczema. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a variable and poor long-term prognosis for hand eczema in the general population. One-third sought medical care during follow-up, while the vast majority with ongoing hand eczema experienced negative psychosocial consequences. For about 5%, the hand eczema gave far-reaching consequences including long sick-leave periods, sick pension and changes of occupation.     

Use of protective gloves by hairdressers: A review of efficacy and potential adverse effects

Occupational hand eczema is common among hairdressers, and protective gloves are important in limiting exposure to irritants and allergens. Various glove types may differ in their protective ability, and their use may lead to hand eczema due to skin irritancy and allergy. MEDLINE was searched for studies investigating permeation of gloves to irritants and allergens used in the hairdressing trade, as well as adverse effects of glove use affecting hairdressers. Forty-four studies were identified; nine reported on permeation. Of those, two in vitro studies found nitrile rubber (NR) gloves to give the best protection when handling hair dyes. Polyethylene (PE) gloves had the lowest reported break-through time. The prevalence of sensitization to rubber materials in European hairdressers was as follows: thiuram mix, median 2.5% (range 0%-8.2%), weighted average 3.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0%-3.1%); mercapto mix, median 0.4% (range 0%-3.3%), weighted average 0.5% (95% CI 0.47%-0.50%), mercaptobenzothiazole, median 0.6% (range 0%-6.6%), weighted average 0.7% (95% CI 0.6%-0.7%), NRL-type I allergy, median 1.3% (range 1%-16.4%), weighted average 4.0% (95% CI 3.6%-4.5%). In conclusion, NR gloves provide the best skin protection for hairdressers, although natural rubber latex (NRL) and polyvinylchloride (PVC) gloves may be sufficient in most cases. PE gloves are not recommended. Synthetic rubber gloves with low or no levels of accelerators are preferred.     

Hand eczema in hairdressers and nurses: a prospective study I.

A prospective study of the development of hand eczema was initiated in 86 junior hairdressers and 217 junior nurses. Data obtained at the start of their apprenticeships are presented. None of the junior apprentices presented with hand eczema, but a history of hand eczema was reported by 22/303 (7%) of the students. Almost half of this group (10/22, 45%) could be classified as atopics. Students without a history of hand eczema showed a similar frequency of atopy (17%) as observed in the general population. History of hand eczema was not related to nickel hypersensitivity, as assessed by patch testing. The incidence of nickel hypersensitivity was high in junior hairdressers (26%), compared to junior nurses (12%). Information as to previous contacts with nickel suggested that development of nickel allergy had been promoted by ear-piercing. A lower incidence of nickel hypersensitivity was observed if this potentially sensitizing event had been proceeded by orthodontic treatment with nickel-containing materials. This phenomenon is discussed in terms of orally-induced tolerance.