Once-daily budesonide inhalation powder (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) maintains pulmonary function and symptoms of asthmatic children previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of pediatric asthma has increased dramatically over the past few decades, with approximately 5% of American children affected by the disease. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler with placebo in asthmatic children previously treated with orally inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter (17 centers) study included 274 male and female children (aged 6 to 17 years) with a history of asthma for at least the previous 6 months. Patients received placebo or budesonide Turbuhaler (200 microg or 400 microg) once daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), AM and PM peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs), nighttime and daytime asthma symptom severity scores, patient discontinuations, use of beta2-agonists as breakthrough medication, forced vital capacity (FVC), and midexpiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25%-75%). Safety was evaluated by adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable among treatment groups. Percentage of predicted FEV1 at baseline was 76.6 +/- 6.9 for placebo, 77.5 +/- 7.1, and 77.0 +/- 7.8 for the budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg and 400 microg groups, respectively. Significantly (P < or = 0.024) more placebo patients (24%) discontinued treatment because of disease deterioration or no improvement than budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg (11%) or 400 microg patients (10%). Patients receiving budesonide Turbuhaler experienced significant improvements in FEV1 compared with patients receiving placebo (P < or = 0.015). Significant (P < or = 0.041) improvements over placebo also were observed in AM and PM PEFRs, FVC, FEF25%-75%, nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms, and amount of beta2-agonist used in both budesonide Turbuhaler groups. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity and similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler is effective and safe in children with persistent asthma previously maintained on at least twice-daily dosing regimens of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Once-daily budesonide inhalation suspension for the treatment of persistent asthma in infants and young children.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCS) are the most effective long-term controller medications for the treatment of persistent asthma. Currently, however, available delivery devices limit their use in young children. A nebulized formulation of budesonide has been developed to address the needs of infants and young children. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily budesonide inhalation suspension in children 6 months to 8 years old with mild persistent asthma not on inhaled GCS. METHODS: Three hundred fifty-nine children were randomized to receive once-daily budesonide inhalation suspension (0.25 mg, 0.50 mg, or 1.0 mg) or placebo via a Pari LC-Jet Plus nebulizer for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included nighttime/daytime asthma symptoms, pulmonary function (subset of patients), rescue medication use, and treatment discontinuations. Safety was based on adverse events and assessment of HPA-axis function. RESULTS: Demographics, baseline characteristics, asthma symptoms, and pulmonary function were similar across treatment groups. Mean nighttime/daytime asthma symptom scores were 1.19 +/- 0.63 and 1.34 +/- 0.53, respectively. Mean duration of asthma was 36.3 months and mean FEV1 was 81.3% of predicted with 27.7% reversibility. Following 12 weeks of treatment, all budesonide inhalation suspension doses produced significant improvements in nighttime/daytime symptoms (P < or = .049) and significant decreases in rescue medication use (P < or = .038) compared with placebo. Significant improvements (P < or = .044) in FEV1 were observed in the 0.5- and 1.0-mg budesonide inhalation suspension groups. There were no differences between doses of budesonide inhalation suspension. Adverse events and basal and ACTH-stimulated cortisol levels were similar among all groups. CONCLUSION: Once-daily administration of budesonide inhalation suspension was well tolerated and effective for the treatment of mild persistent asthma in infants and young children not adequately controlled with bronchodilators or non-GCS antiinflammatory treatments.     

Once-daily mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in the treatment of patients with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Although inhaled glucocorticoids are recommended for all stages of persistent asthma, compliance with long-term therapy is often poor, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. A simplified, once-daily dosing regimen may foster improved compliance. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily (AM) administration of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (MF DPI) 200 microg and 400 microg with placebo in patients with asthma previously maintained only on short-acting inhaled beta-adrenergic receptor agonists. Methods: This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. The mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) for FEV1 was the primary efficacy variable. Results: At endpoint, both doses of MF DPI were significantly more effective than placebo (P < or = .05) in improving FEV1. Based on morning peak expiratory flow rate, once-daily MF DPI 400 microg was more effective than placebo (P < or = .001) at endpoint. Both active treatments also demonstrated improvement at endpoint in asthma symptom scores, physician-evaluated response to therapy and use of rescue medication. Although both MF DPI dosages were efficacious, MF DPI 400 microg provided additional improvement in some measures of pulmonary function (eg, morning PEFR) when these agents were administered once daily in the morning. Both doses of MF DPI were well tolerated and treatment-related adverse events occurred at a similar incidence among the three treatment groups. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that once-daily (AM) MF DPI provides a convenient and effective treatment option for patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma.     

Budesonide Turbuhaler delivered once daily improves health-related quality of life and maintains improvements with a stepped-down dose in adults with mild to moderate asthma.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide inhalation powder administered via Turbuhaler (budesonide Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE) is proven efficacious and safe in the treatment of mild to severe asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in adults with mild to moderate asthma. METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group study, 309 asthmatic patients between 18 and 70 years of age were randomized to receive once-daily treatment with budesonide 200 or 400 microg or placebo for 6 weeks. Patients initially receiving 400 microg budesonide had their dose reduced to 200 microg (400/200-microg group), and patients receiving 200 microg (200/200-microg group) or placebo continued to receive their assigned doses for a 12-week maintenance phase. HRQL was evaluated using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire at randomization, week 6, and week 18. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, patients initially receiving 400 and 200 microg budesonide Turbuhaler demonstrated significantly greater HRQL scores at week 6 (P < or = 0.001 and P < or = 0.010, respectively) that were maintained at week 18 (P < or = 0.001). Clinically important (> or = 0.5 unit) improvement in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire overall at week 18 was demonstrated by 55% and 43% of patients in the 400/200-microg and 200/200-microg budesonide Turbuhaler groups, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with mild to moderate asthma, once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler 200 and 400 microg demonstrates statistically significant and clinically important improvements in HRQL that can be maintained with a low dose of 200 microg.     

Comparison of once-daily to twice-daily treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler.

BACKGROUND: Once-daily dosing with an effective inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) would likely enhance compliance and, therefore, aid in the management of asthma. OBJECTIVE: Several once-daily dosing regimens of mometasone furoate (MF) administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with a twice-daily dosing regimen in 286 patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma who were previously being treated with ICS. METHODS: During a 2-week open-label phase, patients received MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily. They were then randomized to continue MF-DPI, 200 microg twice-daily treatment or to receive MF-DPI, 200 microg once daily in the morning (AM), 200 microg once daily in the evening (PM), 400 microg once daily AM, or placebo as part of the 12-week, double-blind phase. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change from the baseline to endpoint (last evaluable observation) for FEV1. RESULTS: Once-daily MF-DPI, 400 microg, AM maintained FEV1, and morning peak expiratory flow rate, FVC, FEF25%-75%, and asthma symptom scores, at levels similar to those for MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily and significantly better than placebo. Once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, PM was effective in maintaining pulmonary function, but was less effective on other efficacy measures. In comparison to the other MF-DPI groups, once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, AM was not as effective overall. The incidence of local adverse events, including oral candidiasis, was low with all dosages. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily MF-DPI, 400 microg, AM was as effective as MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily, whereas once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, was more effective when administered in the evening compared with morning, for patients receiving ICS therapy. Once-daily dosing offers an effective and convenient treatment that could aid compliance in the treatment of asthma.     

Administration of budesonide once daily by means of turbuhaler to subjects with stable asthma.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of chronic, mild-to-moderate asthma with inhaled steroids may include use of the lowest possible doses, as recommended in guidelines, and a reduction in the frequency of daily administration for greater convenience. Lower doses and once daily treatment with inhaled steroids must be rigorously evaluated in controlled clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of once daily treatment with budesonide in subjects with stable asthma. METHODS: Once daily budesonide was assessed in 309 adult subjects, including those who were and were not using an inhaled steroid at baseline. The subjects were stratified by inhaled steroid use and randomly assigned to one of 3 treatments: 200 microgram budesonide, 400 microgram budesonide, or placebo administered by means of Turbuhaler once daily in the morning for 6 weeks. Beyond this point, treatment was continued unchanged for another 12 weeks (maintenance) in those receiving 200 microgram budesonide once daily and placebo. In those who received 400 microgram budesonide once daily, the dose was reduced to 200 microgram once daily at week 6 and held constant for the remaining 12 weeks (400/200 microgram group). Primary efficacy endpoints were mean change from baseline in FEV1 and morning peak expiratory flow. RESULTS: Once daily budesonide was well tolerated and resulted in significant improvements in all efficacy endpoints, even though baselines were well stabilized. Baseline lung function was elevated with little room for improvement; however, mean increases in FEV1 during the maintenance period were 0.10 L and 0.11 L in the 200 microgram and 400/200 microgram groups, respectively, versus a decrease of -0.09 L in the placebo arm (P <.001). Results for peak expiratory flow were similar. Significant improvements in secondary endpoints, including symptoms, beta-agonist use, and quality of life, also developed with budesonide 200 and 400 microgram once daily. CONCLUSION: Inhaled budesonide, in doses as low as 200 microgram, may be an appropriate introductory or maintenance dose in subjects with stable, mild-to-moderate asthma.     

The effectiveness of high-dose inhaled budesonide therapy in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in children.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend the use of systemic steroids for the treatment of acute asthma attack if it has not been resolved within 24 to 36 hours of home management with regular beta2 mimetic inhalation. Such therapy for infrequent exacerbations is unlikely to have serious systemic effects. Unfortunately, many patients receiving frequent courses are potentially at risk for corticosteroid-induced side effects such as adrenal suppression, depression of linear growth, and osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: To decrease the use of frequent oral corticosteroid courses in children, this study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose inhaled steroids in comparison with oral steroids, in the therapy of acute asthma exacerbations in children. METHODS: Sixty children who have experienced an acute exacerbation of asthma unresponsive to home management with regular use of inhaled beta2 mimetics, yet not severe enough to hospitalize, were randomized to be treated with either high-dose inhaled budesonide (1,600 microg daily) or oral methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg daily) plus medium-dose inhaled budesonide (800 microg daily, both in addition to inhaled terbutaline, 2,000 microg daily). Pre- and posttreatment pulmonary index scores, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC and forced expiratory flow 25% to 75% (FEF25%-75%) were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean number of decrease in pulmonary index score was 2.61 +/- 1.12 in the high-dose budesonide-receiving group (group I) and 1.90 +/- 1.08 in the oral steroid-receiving group (group II). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups, in favor of group I (P = .038). No statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups with respect to the increase in lung function test measurements (FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25%-75%; P = .790, .959, .819, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term high-dose budesonide therapy can be considered an alternative for children who are experiencing an acute asthma attack that is unresponsive to home management with regular use of an inhaled beta2 mimetic, yet who are not severe enough to hospitalize.     

Rapid onset of control with budesonide Turbuhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide (Pulmicort) is an inhaled corticosteroid with high topical potency but low systemic activity. Turbuhaler is a novel breath-actuated, multi-dose, dry-powder inhaler. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of two different dose regimens of budesonide Turbuhaler, compared with placebo, in adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma not well-controlled with bronchodilator therapy. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of 200 microg and 400 microg of budesonide, administered twice daily via Turbuhaler, with placebo, in 273 adult patients (aged 19 to 70 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma (FEV1 67% of predicted normal), not well-controlled with bronchodilator therapy. Efficacy was assessed by pulmonary function tests and patient assessments of asthma symptom control. Safety was assessed in terms of adverse events, laboratory evaluations, and physical examinations. RESULTS: Two hundred and 400 microg of budesonide bid were significantly more effective than placebo at improving morning PEF (mean differences from placebo of 43.63 L/min and 40.10 L/min, respectively; P < .001) and FEV1 (mean differences from placebo of 0.44 L, and 0.50 L, respectively; P < .001) over the 12-week treatment period. Onset of action as assessed by morning PEF was within two days. Basal and stimulated plasma cortisol concentrations were not significantly affected by budesonide treatment compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of adults suffering from mild-to-moderate asthma with budesonide Turbuhaler is well tolerated and results in a rapid onset of asthma control which is maintained over time.     

Effect of montelukast on peripheral airflow obstruction in children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Montelukast is a widely used controller agent in childhood asthma. It is modestly effective in reducing symptoms, decreasing the need for rescue albuterol, and improving forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether montelukast therapy improves peripheral airway obstruction as measured by lung volumes, air trapping, airway resistance (Raw), and specific conductance (Sgaw). METHODS: Twenty-one children aged 9 to 18 years with mild-to-moderate asthma were randomized into a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to receive montelukast (5 or 10 mg) or matching placebo daily for 8 weeks. Symptoms and albuterol use were recorded twice daily, and exhaled nitric oxide measurement, forced oscillometry, spirometry, and body box plethysmography (before and after beta-agonist use) were performed at randomization and at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. Circulating eosinophil counts and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels were obtained at randomization and at 8 weeks. RESULTS: Montelukast-treated patients had lower residual volume (P = .05), residual volume-total lung capacity ratio (P = .04), Raw (P = .02), Sgaw (P = .03), and serum ECP levels (P = .02) at 8 weeks compared with those treated with placebo. There was a trend toward reduced daytime and nighttime albuterol use, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences in FEV1, FEV1-forced vital capacity ratio, exhaled nitric oxide levels, or daytime and nighttime symptom scores between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast therapy was associated with less air trapping, hyperinflation, and Raw and better Sgaw compared with placebo. Lower serum ECP levels, a surrogate measure of airway inflammation, were associated with improvements in lung function.     

Once-daily evening administration of mometasone furoate in asthma treatment initiation.

BACKGROUND: In a previous study, a 200-microg once-daily evening dose of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (DPI) was effective in patients with asthma previously taking inhaled corticosteroids. No studies have been conducted to test the effect of a once-daily evening dose in patients previously using only short-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists (SABAs) for symptom relief. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of mometasone furoate DPI administered once daily in the evening as initial controller therapy in patients previously using SABAs alone for asthma. METHODS: Patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma from 18 US centers participated in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients received either mometasone furoate DPI, 200 microg, or placebo once daily in the evening. The primary efficacy variable was the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second from baseline to the end point (last evaluable visit). Other measurements included forced vital capacity, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75%, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, asthma symptoms, use of albuterol, nocturnal awakenings, physicians' evaluation of response to therapy, and time to asthma worsening. RESULTS: At the end point, the mean increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second relative to baseline for the mometasone furoate DPI group of 0.43 L (16.8%) was significantly greater than that for the placebo group of 0.16 L (6.0%) (P < .01). Morning peak expiratory flow, forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% also significantly improved with mometasone furoate DPI treatment relative to placebo (P < .01). Once-daily dosing with mometasone furoate DPI was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Mometasone furoate DPI (200 microg) administered once daily in the evening significantly improves pulmonary function in patients previously using SABAs alone for asthma control.     

A six-month, placebo-controlled comparison of the safety and efficacy of salmeterol or beclomethasone for persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data comparing the long-term safety and efficacy of long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists versus low-dose inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate, beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), and placebo over a 6-month treatment period in patients with persistent asthma. METHODS: Salmeterol (42 microg twice daily), BDP (84 microg four times daily), or placebo was administered via metered-dose inhaler to 386 adolescent and adult inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Eligible patients demonstrated a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from 65% to 90% of predicted values. Pulmonary function, symptom control, frequency of asthma exacerbations, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine challenge, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: There were few statistically significant differences between the two active treatments over 6 months of therapy. Asthma symptoms and lung function were significantly improved with both salmeterol and BDP compared with placebo (changes from baseline in FEV1 of 0.28 L (SE = 0.04) and 0.23 L (SE = 0.04), respectively, compared with 0.08 L (SE = 0.04); P < or = .014). There were no significant differences among the treatment groups with respect to the distribution of asthma exacerbations over time. Both salmeterol and BDP significantly reduced BHR compared with placebo (P < or = .033; changes from baseline of 1.29 (SE = 0.26) and 1.42 (SE = 0.24) doubling doses at 6 months, respectively, compared with 0.24 (SE = 0.29) doubling dose for placebo). No rebound effect in BHR was seen upon cessation of any of the three treatment regimens. There were no clinically important differences in the safety profiles among the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Both salmeterol and BDP are effective and well-tolerated when administered for 6 months to inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients with persistent asthma.     

Dose-response comparison of budesonide dry powder inhalers using adenosine monophosphate bronchial challenge.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to adenosine monophosphate, an indirect measure of airway inflammation, is a sensitive marker of inhaled corticosteroid efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative therapeutic efficacy of budesonide delivered via Clickhaler and Turbuhaler dry powder inhalers in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: In a double-masked, dose-response crossover study, 27 patients received inhaled budesonide in cumulative sequential doubling dose increments, 2 weeks per dose, of 200, 400, and 800 microg/d. Each treatment block was preceded by 1- to 3-week placebo run-in and washout periods. End points were measured after each placebo (ie, baseline) and treatment period. Adenosine monophosphate bronchial challenge was the primary outcome, and exhaled nitric oxide, serum eosinophilic cationic protein, spirometry, domiciliary peak expiratory flow, symptoms, and rescue medication use were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: For the adenosine monophosphate provocation concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20), a significant overall dose-response effect (P = .006) was found, and there was no significant difference between the devices (P = .8). The relative microgram dose potency ratio between Clickhaler and Turbuhaler was 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-2.46). After administration of the highest dose of budesonide, the mean doubling dilution shift in adenosine monophosphate PC20 from placebo baseline was 3.46 (95% CI, 2.66-4.27) with the Clickhaler vs 3.41 (95% CI, 2.47-4.35) with the Turbuhaler. A significant overall dose-response effect was demonstrated for exhaled nitric oxide (P = .03) but not for any of the other secondary outcome measures. There were no significant differences between the devices for any of the outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Inhaled budesonide exhibited overall dose-response effects on adenosine monophosphate PC20 delivered via Turbuhaler and Clickhaler, with no significant difference between the devices.     

Effects of treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (DPI) has been shown to effectively treat asthma in children. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI in the treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in children previously using inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). METHODS: A 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study evaluated 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI (100 microg every evening and 100 microg twice daily) in 296 children 4 to 11 years old with asthma previously using ICSs. The primary efficacy variable was the change in percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to end point. Secondary efficacy variables included absolute FEV1, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% forced vital capacity, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, albuterol use, nocturnal awakenings, response to therapy, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline at end point in predicted FEV1 were 4.73 and 5.52 percentage points for mometasone furoate DPI, 100 microg every evening and 100 microg twice daily, respectively, the difference of which was not significant, and -1.77 percentage points for placebo (P < or = .002). Significant improvements in secondary efficacy variables were also observed for both mometasone furoate DPI treatments over placebo. Both mometasone furoate DPI doses were well tolerated, and no significant differences were noted among the 3 treatment groups in adverse event reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Both mometasone furoate DPI doses were well tolerated and significantly improved lung function, maintained effective asthma control, and improved quality of life in children with asthma.     

Comparison of roflumilast, an oral anti-inflammatory, with beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast is an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory activity in development for the treatment of asthma. Roflumilast was compared with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in patients with asthma. METHODS: In a double blind, double-dummy, randomized, noninferiority study, 499 patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] = 50-85% predicted) received roflumilast 500 microg once daily or BDP 200 microg twice daily (400 microg/day) for 12 weeks. Lung function and adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Roflumilast and BDP significantly improved FEV1 by 12% (270 +/- 30 ml) and 14% (320 +/- 30 ml), respectively (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). Roflumilast and BDP also significantly improved forced vital capacity (FVC) (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). There were no significant differences between roflumilast and BDP with regard to improvement in FEV1 and FVC. Roflumilast and BDP showed small improvements in median asthma symptom scores (-0.82 and -1.00, respectively) and reduced rescue medication use (-1.00 and -1.15 median puffs/day, respectively; P < 0.0001 vs baseline). These small differences between roflumilast and BDP were not considered clinically relevant. Both agents were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily, oral roflumilast 500 microg was comparable with inhaled twice-daily BDP (400 microg/day) in improving pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, and reducing rescue medication use in patients with asthma.     

Comparison of powder and aerosol formulations of salmeterol in the treatment of asthma.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of the aerosol metered-dose inhaler (MDI) formulation of salmeterol for asthma symptoms have been established. Recently, salmeterol has been introduced as a micronized powder formulation administered via a breath-activated multidose powder inhaler (Diskus). OBJECTIVE: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study involving 498 adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder 50 microg twice daily via Diskus, salmeterol aerosol 42 microg twice daily via MDI, and placebo. METHODS: Patients were randomized to one of the three treatment groups for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by serial measurements of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) over 12 hours, daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), self-rated asthma symptom scores, nighttime awakenings, and supplemental albuterol use. Safety of each treatment was evaluated by monitoring vital signs, electrocardiograms, Holter monitoring, and occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: As compared with placebo, both salmeterol powder and aerosol produced significant improvement in FEV1 and PEF and decreased nighttime awakenings and supplemental albuterol use. There were no significant differences in the efficacy of the two salmeterol formulations. The magnitude of improvement in pulmonary function was undiminished over the 12-week study. Both formulations of salmeterol were well tolerated, with safety profiles not significantly different from placebo. CONCLUSION: Results of this study indicate that salmeterol, administered either as a powder 50 microg twice daily via Diskus or as an aerosol 42 microg twice daily via MDI, produces clinically significant and comparable improvement in pulmonary function and is well tolerated in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.     

A comparison of topical budesonide and oral montelukast in seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis and asthma commonly coexist and are both mediated by similar inflammatory mechanisms. Leukotriene antagonists may therefore be an alternative to corticosteroid therapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare oral montelukast with inhaled plus intranasal budesonide in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-blind double-dummy placebo-controlled crossover study was performed comparing once daily 10 mg oral montelukast with 400 microg inhaled plus 200 microg intranasal budesonide in 12 patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma: mean (S.E.) age 34.0 years (2.7), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 91.2 (3.8)% predicted. Each treatment was for 2 weeks with a 1-week placebo run-in and washout. Measurements were made after each active treatment and placebo for: adenosine monophosphate bronchial challenge, exhaled and nasal nitric oxide. Patients also recorded their domiciliary peak expiratory flow, nasal peak inspiratory flow, asthma and seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the placebos for any measurement. For adenosine monophosphate PC20, geometric mean fold differences (95% confidence interval (CI) for difference) were 6.4 (2.2-18.6) for placebo vs. budesonide, 2.9 (1.0-8.4) for placebo vs. montelukast, and 2.1 (1.1-4.5) for budesonide vs. montelukast. For exhaled nitric oxide (p.p.b.) there was significant (P < 0.05) suppression with both montelukast (10.9) and budesonide (10.1) compared with placebo (18.8). For nasal nitric oxide and nasal peak flow there were only significant differences with budesonide compared with placebo. Both treatments reduced total seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms but only budesonide had a significant effect on nasal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Once-daily inhaled plus intranasal budesonide and once daily montelukast showed comparable efficacy on lower airway, but only the budesonide had significant efficacy on upper airway inflammatory markers. Both treatments significantly reduced allergic rhinitis symptoms.     

Effects of adding nedocromil sodium (Tilade®) to the routine therapy of patients with bronchial asthma

In a 12-week double-blind, group comparative trial, preceded by a 2-week baseline period, 38 asthmatic subjects of mixed aetiology and varying severity received either 4 mg nedocromil sodium by metered dose inhaler twice a day or a matching placebo preparation, in addition to their existing maintenance therapy of inhaled corticosteroids plus inhaled bronchodilators. Asthma severity and lung function were assessed at 4-weekly clinic visits, and symptomatology (morning tightness, daytime asthma, cough, night-time asthma), morning, afternoon and evening PEFR, and the use of inhaled bronchodilators were recorded on daily diary cards. Treatment with nedocromil sodium led to significant (P less than 0.05) improvements in clinic assessment of FEV1 and PEFR both before and after an inhaled bronchodilator from at least the eighth week onwards. Mid-study FVC was also significantly (P less than 0.05) improved. Daily PEFR increased throughout the study in the nedocromil sodium-treated subjects and the diurnal variation was reduced. Daily symptom severity was also reduced and these improvements occurred despite the similar or slightly reduced use of inhaled bronchodilators. However, none of these improvements in diary card parameters reached statistical significance. By the final week of the study subjects treated with nedocromil sodium predominantly had a mild form of asthma or no symptoms at all, and both patients and clinicians reported the effectiveness of nedocromil sodium; the subjects but not the clinicians finding it significantly more effective (P less than 0.05) than placebo. Nedocromil sodium was well tolerated although one patient was withdrawn owing to a persistent sore throat after 7 weeks of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Treatment with 400 microg of inhaled budesonide vs 200 microg of inhaled budesonide and oral montelukast in children with moderate persistent asthma: randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Montelukast is reported to be beneficial in asthma as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids and may reduce the need for the latter. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a combination of oral montelukast and 200 microg of inhaled budesonide has comparable efficacy to 400 microg of inhaled budesonide alone in children with moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: In this prospective, blinded, hospital-based randomized controlled trial, 71 children with moderate persistent asthma were randomized to receive either montelukast, 5-mg chewable tablet, with 200 microg of inhaled budesonide or only 400 microg of inhaled budesonide daily for 12 weeks. Baseline and serial measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow rate, and Asthma Symptom Score were performed; the frequency and severity of exacerbations were also recorded. RESULTS: Measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow rate, and Asthma Symptom Score showed no significant differences between the 2 groups at baseline, during the serial follow-up visits, and at the end of the study. However, children who received montelukast had a greater frequency of exacerbations vs those who did not (33.3% vs 9.1%; P < .01). CONCLUSION: The overall control of asthma with 5 mg of oral montelukast and 200 microg of inhaled budesonide is inferior to that with 400 microg of inhaled budesonide in children with moderate persistent asthma.     

Loss of response to treatment with leukotriene receptor antagonists but not inhaled corticosteroids in patients over 50 years of age.

BACKGROUND: There are limited published data describing the relative efficacy of available treatment options in younger versus older patients with persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP) and zafirlukast (Z) in younger (12 to 49 years of age) versus older (50 years and older) patients with asthma. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of five randomized, double-blind, double-dummy studies 4 to 12 weeks in duration of 1,742 patients <50 years of age and 243 patients aged 50 years or older. Interventions were inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) 88 microg, oral Z 20 mg, or placebo twice daily. RESULTS: Treatment with FP resulted in significantly greater improvements than Z in all efficacy measurements (except for nighttime awakenings) regardless of age. In older patients, treatment with FP significantly increased pulmonary function compared with Z: FEV (FP= +0.19 L; placebo = -0.34 L; Z = -0.06 L); AM peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR] (FP = +25 L/minute; placebo = -18 L/minute; Z = +4 L/minute); PM PEFR (FP = +24 L/minute; placebo = -24 L/minute; Z = +5 L/minute; P < or = 0.023; for all comparisons). Compared with Z, treatment with FP in older patients also resulted in significantly greater increases in the percentage of symptom-free days (25% vs 13%) and rescue-free days (35% vs 17%); and significantly greater reductions in albuterol use (-1.6 vs -0.3 puffs/day) and the percentage of patients with exacerbations (2.7% vs 14.3%; P < or = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of age, treatment with FP in patients with asthma significantly improved pulmonary function and overall asthma control. In contrast, treatment with Z in older patients with asthma resulted in small improvements in asthma symptoms, whereas lung function improved minimally or not at all, and exacerbations increased. These data suggest that FP effectively controls inflammation in older patients, whereas Z may mask inflammation and may not provide the level of bronchodilatory or anti-inflammatory activity needed for effective asthma control in older patients.     

吸入用沙丁胺醇联合布地奈德对COPD急性加重期的作用

目的 观察吸入用沙丁胺醇联合布地奈德对COPD急性加重期的作用。方法 选取2015年1月~2017年1月我院治疗的86例COPD急性加重期患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组43例。对照组在常规治疗的基础上雾化吸入布地奈德,观察组在对照组的基础上吸入用沙丁胺醇。比较两组治疗前后用力肺活量（FVC）、第1秒用力呼气容积（FEV1）,临床治疗效果。结果 治疗后,两组FVC、FEV1均高于治疗前,观察组FVC、FEV1分别为（2.08±0.57）L、（1.97±0.43）L,高于对照组的（1.69±0.49）L、（1.47±0.36）L,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;观察组治疗有效率为97.67%,高于对照组的76.74%,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 吸入用沙丁胺醇联合布地奈德有助于改善COPD急性期患者FVC、FEV1,具有较高的疗效。