Rapid induction sequence with vecuronium: should we intubate after 60 or 90 seconds?

The purpose of the study was to determine intubating conditions after administration of either succinylcholine or vecuronium in a rapid induction sequence. Patients received either succinylcholine 1.5 mg.kg-1 (Groups I and II) after d-tubocurarine 0.05 mg.kg-1 four minutes earlier, or vecuronium (Groups III and IV) in an initial dose of 0.01 mg.kg-1 followed four minutes later by 0.1 mg.kg-1. In Groups I and III an apnoeic delay of one minute was allowed before intubation whereas in Groups II and IV the delay was 90 sec. There was no significant difference in intubating conditions between Groups I and IV. Intubating conditions in Group III (vecuronium-delay of one minute) were statistically worse than in any of the three other groups. A delay of 90 sec after succinylcholine improved intubating conditions in male patients. Considering that intubating conditions obtained after 90 sec in patients given a priming sequence with vecuronium (Group IV) were not different from those obtained 60 sec after succinylcholine (Group I), the authors conclude that vecuronium is an acceptable alternative for rapid tracheal intubation. In the doses used in this study, intubating conditions 60 sec after vecuronium were unacceptable for rapid induction of anaesthesia.     

Effects of high-dose propofol on succinylcholine-induced fasciculations and myalgia

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the effects of high-dose propofol on the incidence of fasciculations and myalgia, and to evaluate changes in creatine kinase levels following the administration of succinylcholine in 90 women who underwent laparoscopy. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Induction of anesthesia was performed with thiopentone 5 mg kg(-1) in Group I (n = 30), propofol 2 mg kg(-1) in Group II (n = 30), and propofol 3.5 mg kg(-1) in Group III (n = 30). Then succinylcholine 1 mg kg(-1) was administered to the patients for intubation. RESULTS: Fasciculation was absent in 20% of Group III patients, and no vigorous fasciculation occurred in this group. Furthermore, the severity of fasciculation in Group III was significantly lower than in the other two groups (P = 0.01). Seventy per cent of patients had no myalgia in Group III, 39.2% in Group II and 37% in Group I (P = 0.007). Severity of myalgia was also significantly lower in Group III compared with the other two groups (P = 0.011). Post-operative creatine kinase levels were significantly higher than their baseline values in Groups I and II (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Administration of propofol 3.5 mg kg-1 is effective in reducing fasciculations and myalgia after succinylcholine.     

Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: a technique using propofol and varying doses of alfentanil.

We have noted that tracheal intubation can be accomplished in many patients after induction of anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil without the simultaneous use of muscle relaxants. This study was designed to evaluate airway and intubating conditions after administration of propofol and alfentanil in 75 ASA physical status I or II outpatients with Mallampati class I airways undergoing various surgical procedures. The patients were randomly assigned to one of five groups for induction of anesthesia. All patients received midazolam 1 mg IV before induction of anesthesia. Group I patients (n = 15) received d-tubocurarine 3 mg, thiamylal 4 mg/kg, and succinylcholine 1 mg/kg IV. Groups II-V patients (n = 15 each) received alfentanil 30, 40, 50, or 60 micrograms/kg followed by propofol 2 mg/kg IV. No muscle relaxants were given to patients in groups II-V. Airway management was performed by one of the authors who was blinded as to the dose of alfentanil administered. After loss of consciousness, patients' lungs were ventilated via face mask, and the ease of ventilation was recorded. Jaw mobility was also assessed. Ninety seconds after administration of the propofol or thiamylal, laryngoscopy was performed and exposure of the glottis and position of the vocal cords were noted. Intubation of the trachea was performed and patient response was noted. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were also recorded before induction of anesthesia, after induction, and then again after intubation of the trachea. The lungs of all patients were easily ventilated via mask, and the jaw was judged to be relaxed in all patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Diazepam Does Not Prevent Succinylcholine-Induced Fasciculations and Myalgia: A Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Diazepam and d-Tubocurarine Pretreatments

To determine the effectiveness of diazepam pretreatment in preventing succinylcholine (SCh)-induced fasciculations and body pains, 587 patients were randomly allocated to six groups. Patients in Group I received no pretreatment and served as controls. Patients in Groups II and III were pretreated with 0.05 mg/kg of diazepam either 4-5 min (Group II) or 8-10 min (Group III) prior to SCh administration. Patients in Groups IV and V received 0.1 mg/kg of diazepam either 4-5 min (Group IV) or 8-10 min (Group V) prior to SCh administration, while patients in Group VI were pretreated with 0.05 mg/kg of d-tubocurarine (dTc) 4-5 min prior to SCh. The succinylcholine dosage was 1.0 mg/kg in Groups I through V and 1.5 mg/kg in Group VI. Fasciculations, intubation conditions and postoperative body pains were evaluated in all groups. Fasciculations were seen in 90% of patients in the control group and 15% in the dTc pretreatment group, while diazepam was ineffective in altering the frequency or intensity of fasciculations. Conditions for intubation were judged to be clinically adequate in all groups. Body pains were seen in 33% of patients in the control group and 28-36% in diazepam-pretreated groups and in only 8% of patients in the dTc pretreatment group. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of body pains by virtue of site of operation, age, sex, and inpatient/outpatient status. It is concluded that the problem of postoperative myalgia is significant and that dTc pretreatment is the effective method for prevention of fasciculations and postoperative myalgia. Diazepam pretreatment was ineffective for the prevention of fasciculations and myalgia.     

Is succinylcholine after pretreatment with d-tubocurarine and lidocaine contraindicated for outpatient anesthesia?

Because succinylcholine has obvious advantages for facilitating endotracheal intubation in the ambulatory setting (e.g., low cost, fast onset, and no need for reversal of neuromuscular block), it is important to determine whether this muscle relaxant is indeed associated with an increased incidence of postoperative myalgias, compared with alternative but more expensive nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. We studied 119 outpatients undergoing endoscopic nasal sinus surgery or septoplasty. The anesthetic technique consisted of propofol/lidocaine for induction, followed by isoflurane/nitrous oxide/oxygen for maintenance. Oral tracheal intubation was performed by using a fiberscope. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two muscle relaxant groups. Group 1 patients received d-tubocurarine 3 mg followed by succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg. Group 2 patients received mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg. After recovery from anesthesia, patients were asked whether they had any muscle pain and/or stiffness. Pain was categorized by location and quantified by using a verbal scale (from 0 to 10). Analgesic usage and myalgias limiting ambulation were recorded. After discharge from the ambulatory surgery unit, patients were contacted by telephone on Postoperative Day 1. If patients complained of myalgias, they were contacted by telephone on Days 2 and 3. Only one patient (in the mivacurium-treated group) reported myalgia as a limiting factor in ambulation or resumption of normal activity. There were no differences between groups with respect to the incidence (21% in the succinylcholine-treated group and 18% in the mivacurium-treated group), location, or severity of myalgia. In conclusion, succinylcholine (preceded by pretreatment with d-tubocurarine and lidocaine) is not associated with an increased incidence of myalgias, compared with mivacurium, when used to facilitate tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ambulatory nasal surgery. Implications: The results of this study show that the frequency of muscle pains after surgery in outpatients is approximately 20%, regardless of whether succinylcholine (after precurarization) or mivacurium is used to assist in insertion of the breathing tube.     

A combination of alfentanil-lidocaine-propofol provides better intubating conditions than fentanyl-lidocaine-propofol in the absence of muscle relaxants

PURPOSE: To compare the ease of tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants following an alfentanil-lidocaine-propofol sequence vs a fentanyl-lidocaine-propofol sequence. CLINICAL FEATURES: In 80 ASA I and II adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery, we compared the intubating conditions following alfentanil 20 microg x kg(-1), lidocaine 1.5 mg x kg(-1), propofol 3 mg x kg(-1) (Group I; n = 40) vs fentanyl 2 microg x kg(-1), lidocaine 1.5 mg x kg(-1), propofol 3 mg x kg(-1) (Group II; n = 40). The intubating conditions were scored by jaw relaxation, vocal cord position and response to intubation, as well as by blood pressure and heart rate changes. The intubating conditions were good or excellent in 95% of patients in Group I vs 62.5% of patients in Group II (P < 0.05). Blood pressure decreased from a preinduction value of 86 +/- 13 mmHg to 72 +/- 28 mmHg and 74 +/- 19 mmHg in Group I, and from 85 +/- 12 mmHg to 78 +/- 15 mmHg and 78 +/- 12 mmHg in Group II, one and five minutes following intubation (P < 0.05). This drop in blood pressure was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: An alfentanil-lidocaine-propofol sequence offers significantly better intubating conditions than a fentanyl-lidocaine-propofol sequence in healthy adult patients.     

Propofol — not thiopental or etomidate — with remifentanil provides adequate intubating conditions in the absence of neuromuscular blockade

PURPOSE: Administration of remifentanil followed by propofol provides adequate conditions for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants. Other hypnotic drugs have not been thoroughly investigated in this regard. Intubating conditions with remifentanil followed by propofol, thiopentone or etomidate are compared in this study. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study 45 healthy males were assigned to one of three groups (n = 15). After iv atropine, remifentanil 3 microg x kg(-1) were injected over 90 sec followed by propofol 2 mg x kg(-1) (Group I), thiopentone 6 mg x kg(-1) (Group II) or etomidate 0.3 mg x kg(-1) (Group III). Ninety seconds after the administration of the hypnotic agent, laryngoscopy and intubation were attempted. Intubating conditions were assessed as excellent, good or poor on the basis of ease of ventilation, jaw relaxation, position of the vocal cords, and patient response to intubation and slow inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff. RESULTS: One patient in Group I, three patients in Group II and five patients in Group III could not be intubated on the first attempt. Clinically acceptable intubating conditions were observed in 93.3%, 66.7%, 40.0% of patients in Groups I, II and III, respectively. Overall conditions at intubation were significantly (P < 0.05) better, and the frequency of excellent conditions was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the propofol group compared with the thiopentone and etomidate groups. No patient was treated for hypotension or bradycardia. CONCLUSION: Propofol 2 mg x kg(-1) was superior to thiopentone 6 mg x kg(-1) and etomidate 0.3 mg x kg(-1) for tracheal intubation when combined with remifentanil 3 microg x kg(-1) and no muscle relaxant.     

Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: a comparison of remifentanil with alfentanil in children

AIM: Propofol has a high incidence of pain on injection, particularly when a vein on the back of hand is used. Administration of lidocaine, either before or mixed with propofol remains the most widely used method to attenuate this pain. The use of opioids such as alfentanil and fentanyl has been found to decrease pain induced by propofol injection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different doses of remifentanil and alfentanil in minimizing the pain caused by propofol. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, healthy premedicated children between the age group of 5-12 years admitted for adenotonsillectomy were randomly allocated to one of 6 treatment groups. Group I: remifentanil 0.25 microg kg(-1); Group II: remifentanil 0.50 microg kg(-1); Group III: alfentanil 15 microg kg(-1); Group IV: alfentanil 20 microg kg(-1) 60 s prior to propofol mixed with 1 mL of 0.9% normal saline; Group V: lidocaine 1 mL of 1% (10 mg) added to 100 mg of propofol and Group VI: normal saline. During the injection of propofol (3 mg kg(-1)) pain perception was assessed with a four-point behavioural scale: none, mild, moderate, or severe. RESULTS: There were 52 subjects in Group I, 51 in Group II, 49 in Group III, 52 in Group IV, 52 in Group V and 52 in Group VI; 63.46% of patients in Group I, 39.21% in Group II, 38.77% in Group III, 36.53% in Group IV, 38.46% in Group V and 84.61% in Group VI experienced pain. Statistically, Groups II, III, IV and V were significantly better than placebo in the reduction of propofol pain (P<0.0001). Groups II, III and IV significantly reduced the pain in comparison with Group I (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with intravenous remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1), alfentanil 15 microg kg(-1) and 20 microg kg(-1) were equally effective in reducing pain associated with propofol injection in children between the age group of 5-12 years.     

Tracheal intubating conditions after induction with sevoflurane 8% in children. A comparison with two intravenous techniques

We studied tracheal intubating conditions in 120 healthy children, aged 3-12 years, in a blinded, randomised clinical trial. Children were randomly allocated to one of three groups: group PS, propofol 3 mg.kg-1 and succinylcholine 1 mg.kg-1 (n = 40); group PA, propofol 3 mg.kg-1 and alfentanil 10 microg.kg-1 (n = 40); group SF, sevoflurane 8% in 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen for 3 min (n = 40). Tracheal intubating conditions were graded according to ease of laryngoscopy, position of vocal cords, coughing, jaw relaxation and movement of limbs. Overall intubating conditions were acceptable in 39 of 40 children in the propofol/succinylcholine group, 21 of 40 children in the propofol/alfentanil group and 35 of 40 children in the sevoflurane group. Children receiving propofol and succinylcholine or sevoflurane had better intubating conditions overall than those given propofol and alfentanil (p < 0.01). In conclusion, anaesthetic induction and tracheal intubation using sevoflurane 8% for 3 min is a satisfactory alternative to propofol with succinylcholine in children.     

Comparative evaluation of different doses of propofol preceded by fentanyl on intubating conditions and pressor response during tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to determine the optimal dose of propofol preceded by fentanyl for successful tracheal intubation and to see its effectiveness in blunting pressor response in children aged 3-10 years. METHODS: This prospective, double blind, randomized study was conducted on 60 ASA grade I and II children, between 3 and 10 years undergoing elective surgery who were divided into three groups of 20 each. The children received different doses of propofol (group I, 2.5 mg x kg(-1); group II, 3.0 mg x kg(-1); group III, 3.5 mg x kg(-1)) preceded by a fixed dose of fentanyl (3.0 microg x kg(-1)) 3 min earlier. The tracheal intubating conditions were graded based on scoring system devised by Helbo-Hensen et al. with Steyn modification which includes five criteria; ease of laryngoscopy, degree of coughing, position of vocal cords, jaw relaxation, and limb movement and graded on a 4-point scale. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and oxygen saturation changes were also noted. RESULTS: Tracheal intubating conditions were acceptable in 25% of the patients in group I, while significantly higher (P < 0.001) in group II (80%) and in group III (90%). The pressor response was not effectively blunted in group I (17% increase in HR), while effectively blunted in groups II and III. A fall in cardiac output was seen in group III indicated by a decrease in MAP (16%) and HR (11%). No airway complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol 3 mg x kg(-1) (group II) preceded by fentanyl 3 microg x kg(-1) is the optimal dose combination in our study. It provides acceptable intubating conditions in 80% patients, blunts pressor response to intubation without significant cardiovascular depression.     

Rocuronium combined with i.v. lidocaine for rapid tracheal intubation

BACKGROUND: Rocuronium (ORG 9426) has been shown to have an onset of action more rapid than other nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents and to provide intubating conditions similar to those of succinylcholine 60-90 s after administration. We compared the intubating conditions and hemodynamic changes after the administration of rocuronium 0.6 mg kg(-1) and lidocaine 1.5 mg kg(-1) with rocuronium alone and succinylcholine 60 and 90 s after administration. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five adult patients of ASA physical status I or II scheduled for elective surgery were randomly divided into five groups. After propofol administration in all patients, patients in group Su (succinylcholine), group R60 (rocuronium) and group RL60 (rocuronium-lidocaine) were intubated within 60 s, while groups RL90 and R90 were intubated 90 s after the administration of rocuronium and succinylcholine. Laryngoscopy was performed and intubating conditions were graded by an experienced anesthetist blind to the muscle relaxant allocation. RESULTS: In this study, groups Su, RL60, R90 and RL90 had similar intubation scores, which were significantly better than that for group R60. Heart rate did not increase after intubation in groups Su, RL60 and RL90. CONCLUSION: The combination of lidocaine (1.5 mg kg(-1)) and low-dose rocuronium (0.6 mg kg(-1)) along with propofol is clinically equivalent to succinylcholine, improves intubating conditions in 60 s and effectively blocks increases in heart rate after intubation.     

Rocuronium versus succinylcholine-atracurium for tracheal intubation and maintenance relaxation during propofol anesthesia

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the onset and offset time (clinical duration), and intubating conditions obtained with rocuronium bromide 0.6 mg/kg and succinylcholine 1.0 mg/kg after induction with propofol and fentanyl; and to compare rocuronium with atracurium for maintenance during propofol anesthesia. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, parallel group comparative, randomized study. SETTING: Operating rooms of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 30 ASA physical status I and II adult patients scheduled for elective surgeries with general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients premedicated with midazolam 2 mg were anesthetized with fentanyl 2 microg/kg followed by propofol 2.5 mg/kg and muscle relaxants. Group 1 (n = 15) received succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg and Group 2 (n = 16) received rocuronium bromide 0.6 mg/kg. Intubation was performed 60 seconds after the administration of muscle relaxant. Patients in Group 1 received atracurium and patients in Group 2 received rocuronium for maintenance if required. MEASUREMENTS: The ease of intubation was scored using a scale of 1 to 4. Onset and offset time monitored with evoked twitch response of the adductor pollicis were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: Intubation was successful in all patients and there was no difference in scores between the two groups. Although onset time was shorter with succinylcholine than with rocuronium, neuromuscular blockade was successfully antagonized in both groups, and the recovery profile was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Rocuronium bromide at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg, when used with propofol and fentanyl for induction, provides intubating conditions similar to succinylcholine 1.0 mg/kg at 1 minute. The actual onset time and offset time, however, are significantly longer with rocuronium. There was no difference between atracurium and rocuronium as a maintenance drug. Rocuronium is suitable for surgical procedures greater than 30 minutes, eliminating the need for an additional relaxant to succinylcholine.     

Intubating conditions provided by propofol and alfentanil - acceptable, but not ideal

Background: The use of muscle relaxants to facilitate intubation is associated with several side effects regardless of whether depolarizing or non-depolarizing drugs are used. In the present study we compared the intubating conditions, haemodynamic responses and changes in oxygen saturation following induction with alfentanil and propofol or alfentanil, thiopental and suxamethonium.
Methods: Eighty patients (ASA I or II) were in a double-blind manner assigned to receive either of the two induction methods. Intubating conditions were assessed on the basis of jaw relaxation, ease of insertion of the endotracheal tube and coughing on intubation. Heart rate, systolic arterial pressure and oxygen saturation were monitored throughout the procedure.
Results: The use of alfentanil and propofol resulted in significantly lower scored intubation points. Systolic arterial pressure decreased and heart rate increased significantly in the alfentanil-thiopental-suxamethonium group as compared to the alfentanil-propofol group. There were no significant changes in oxygen saturation.
Conclusion: The results show that propofol and alfentanil in combination provides haemodynamic stability and unaltered oxygen saturation but less optimal intubating conditions.     

Five Non-Depolarizing Muscle Relaxants in Precurarization

Five different non-depolarizing muscle relaxants and a control solution of saline were studied as precurarization agents. Two hundred and twenty-two surgical patients (ASA I-II) were allocated in a double-blind fashion to one of the following groups: d-tubocurarine 0.05 mg/kg, alcuronium 0.03 mg/kg, pancuronium 0.01 mg/kg, gallamine 0.25 mg/kg, ORG NC-45 (vecuronium) 0.01 mg/kg and saline solution 0.005 ml/kg. Pretreatment was performed 4 min before administering a 1.5 mg/kg bolus of succinylcholine (SCh). Fasciculations, intubation conditions, duration of neuromuscular blockade after SCh, serum potassium changes and postoperative myalgias (in 60 patients) were recorded. All the drugs studied prevented fasciculations significantly (P less than 0.05) more than in the control group. d-Tubocurarine and alcuronium were superior to the others in this respect. Intubation conditions were best in the control and pancuronium groups, but there was no significant difference between the pancuronium and d-tubocurarine or between the d-tubocurarine and alcuronium groups. Pancuronium pretreatment prolonged the SCh block significantly, whereas other agents shortened the duration of the SCh block. The antagonism of the SCh block apparently also affected intubation conditions, although intubation remained satisfactory. A statistically significant rise in serum potassium level was measured only in the control and pancuronium groups. In the control and pancuronium groups, four patients out of 10 had postoperative myalgias, whereas in the other groups only one or none out of 10 had them (0/10 vs. 4/10; 0.10 greater than P greater than 0.05). In conclusion, d-tubocurarine and alcuronium seem to have advantages over pancuronium, ORG NC-45 and gallamine for precurarization.     

Low doses of rocuronium during remifentanil-propofol-based anesthesia in children: comparison of intubating conditions

BACKGROUND : In this prospective double-blind study, intubation conditions were compared at 90 s following two different low doses of rocuronium during remifentanil and propofol anesthesia in children undergoing ambulatory procedures. METHODS : Forty-four children (ASA I-II, aged 3-12 years) undergoing day case ENT surgery were premedicated with midazolam 0.5 mg x kg(-1). Following atropine 10 microg x kg(-1), remifentanil infusion 0.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) was started. After 60 s, anesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg x kg(-1). Immediately after a bolus dose of propofol, the children received rocuronium doses of 0.15 mg x kg(-1) (group I, n = 22) or 0.3 mg x kg(-1) (group II, n = 22) in a randomized manner, after which an infusion of propofol 6 mg x kg(-1) h(-1) was added to the infusion of remifentanil 0.5 microg x kg(-1) min(-1) for maintenance of anesthesia. Intubating conditions were evaluated 90 s after rocuronium administration applying the Copenhagen Scoring System which included components of laryngoscopy, vocal cord movement and reaction to intubation. Hemodynamic values were recorded at predetermined time intervals. RESULTS : Excellent, good and poor intubation conditions were 18.2, 40.9 and 40.9% in group I and 40.9, 54.5 and 4.5% in group II. Clinically acceptable intubating conditions (excellent and good) were significantly higher in group II (95.5%) than in group I (59.1%) (P = 0.004). Mean values of heart rate and blood pressure did not differ significantly between groups. No children required any intervention for hemodynamic instability and/or muscle rigidity. CONCLUSIONS : The results suggest that 0.3 mg x kg(-1) of rocuronium may be a better low dose than 0.15 mg x kg(-1) of rocuronium for clinically acceptable intubating conditions in pediatric ambulatory surgery during remifentanil-propofol-based anesthesia at the doses used in the study.     

Intubation conditions after rocuronium or succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction with alfentanil and propofol in the emergency patient

Background and objective: Previous studies mainly conducted on elective patients recommend doses of 0.9-1.2 mg kg[-1] rocuronium to obtain comparable intubation conditions with succinylcholine 1.0 mg kg[-1] after 60 s during a rapid-sequence induction. We decided to compare the overall intubating conditions of standard doses of rocuronium 0.6 mg kg[-1] and succinylcholine 1.0 mg kg[-1] during a strict rapid-sequence induction regimen including propofol and alfentanil. Methods: Male and female patients (ASA I-III) older than 17 yr scheduled for emergency abdominal or gynaecological surgery and with increased risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric content were randomized to a rapid-sequence induction with succinylcholine 1.0 mg kg[-1] or rocuronium 0.6 mg kg[-1]. Patients with a predicted difficult airway were excluded. A senior anaesthesiologist 'blinded' for the randomization performed the intubation 60 s after injection of the neuromuscular blocker. Intubating conditions were evaluated according to an established guideline. Tracheal intubation not completed within 30 s was recorded as failed. Results: 222 patients were randomized. Three patients had their operation cancelled and 10 did not fulfil the inclusion criteria. Clinically acceptable intubation conditions were present in 93.5% and 96.1% of patients in the succinylcholine group (n=107) and the rocuronium group (n=102), respectively (P=0.59). Conclusions: During a rapid-sequence induction with alfentanil and propofol, both rocuronium 0.6 mg kg[-1] and succinylcholine 1.0 mg kg[-1] provide clinically acceptable intubation conditions in 60 s in patients scheduled for emergency surgery. Under the conditions of this rapid-sequence induction regimen rocuronium may be a substitute for succinylcholine.     

Endotracheale Intubation unter Propofol und Fentanyl

The routine use of succinylcholine for endotracheal intubation is being increasingly questioned. Initial studies have suggested that a combination of propofol and alfentanil without a muscle relaxant can provide good intubating conditions. However, most of these initial studies either did not have a double-blind design or did not include a control group with muscle relaxants. In this study, intubation conditions using fentanyl/propofol without a muscle relaxant were compared with the combinations of fentanyl/propofol/succinylcholine and sodium thiopental/succinylcholine. Material and methods. Following approval from the local ethics committee and written consent, 100 gynaecological patients (ASA I, II) were included in this study. The study was carried out in a double blind, randomized and prospective manner. Black perfusor syringes and extension sets were used, and the drugs administered were diluted to equal volumes. For induction, group 1 (n=25) received 0.1?mg fentanyl, 1?mg vecuronium, sodium thiopental (demand-adapted) and succinylcholine 1?mg/kg; group 2 (n=25) received 0.1?mg fentanyl and propofol (demand-adapted); group 3 (n=25) received 0.2?mg fentanyl and propofol (demand-adapted); group 4 (n=25) received 0.1?mg fentanyl, 1?mg vecuronium, propofol (demand-adapted) and succinylcholine 1?mg/kg. Each patient was assessed prior to induction with regard to visualization of the pharynx (grade I–IV). Following induction, jaw relaxation (grade I–IV) and the laryngoscopic visualization of the glottis (grade I-IV) were assessed. During the intubation, the position and movements of the vocal cords (grade I-IV) and patient movement during and 1?min following the intubation were assessed. The overall assessment of the intubation was graded (grade I–IV) by the anaesthetist and the anaesthetic nurse. Postoperatively the patients were questioned regarding muscle pain (grade I–IV). Before, during and after endotracheal intubation arterial haemoglobin oxygen saturation, heart rate and arterial blood pressure were monitored. Results. There were no intergroup differences with regard to age, height, weight and preanaesthetic visualization of the pharynx. In group 1 an average of 5.5±1.2?mg/kg sodium thiopental was required. There were no significant differences in group 2, 3 and 4 with respect to the dose of propofol (2.4, 2.2 and 2.2?mg/kg). No intergroup differences were noted with regard to jaw relaxation, laryngoscopic visualization of the glottis and patients' movements during intubation. Statistically significant intergroup differences occurred with regard to the position and movements of vocal cords during intubation (group 3 worse than groups 1, 2, 4) and the patients' movements 1?min after intubation (group 2 worse than group 3). Significant intergroup differences also occurred with regard to the overall assessment of the intubation by the anaesthetist (group 3 worse than groups 2, 4) and the anaesthetic nurse (group 3 wourse than group 4) and the postoperative muscle pain (group 1 worse than groups 2, 3). Conclusion. The use of 0.1?mg fentanyl/sodium thiopental/succinylcholine results in no better intubating conditions than 0.1?mg fentanyl plus propofol. Under these conditions, without the use of a muscle relaxant, it is possible to carry out safe endotracheal intubation in cases where no complications are anticipated.     

The dose of succinylcholine in morbid obesity

The appropriate dose of succinylcholine (SCH) in morbidly obese patients is unknown. We studied 45 morbidly obese (body mass index >40 kg/m2) adults scheduled for gastric bypass surgery. The response to ulnar nerve stimulation of the adductor pollicis muscle at the wrist was recorded using the TOF-Watch SX acceleromyograph. In a randomized double-blind fashion, patients were assigned to one of three study groups. In Group I, patients received SCH 1 mg/kg ideal body weight, in Group II 1 mg/kg lean body weight, and in Group III 1 mg/kg total body weight. After SCH administration, endotracheal intubating conditions were scored. The recovery from neuromuscular block was recorded for 20 min. There was no difference in the onset time of maximum neuromuscular blockade among groups, but maximum block was significantly less in Group I. The recovery intervals were significantly shorter in Groups I and II. In one third of the patients in Group I, intubating conditions were rated poor, whereas no patient in Group III had poor intubating conditions. Our study demonstrates that for complete neuromuscular paralysis and predictable laryngoscopy conditions, SCH 1 mg/kg total body weight is recommended.     

Duration and recovery profile of cisatracurium after succinylcholine during propofol or isoflurane anesthesia

Study Objective: To determine the duration and recovery profile of maintenance doses of cisatracurium besylate following succinylcholine, and during propofol or isoflurane anesthesia.

Design: Randomized, open-label study.

Setting: Operating suite of a university-affiliated medical center.

Patients: Forty ASA physical status I and II adult patients having elective surgery with general anesthesia lasting longer than 90 minutes.

Interventions: Following a standardized induction sequence, a baseline electromyogram (EMG) was obtained. An intubating dose of intravenous (IV) succinylcholine 1.0 mg/kg was administered. Ventilation was maintained with a face mask until the first twitch (T₁) of the evoked train-of-four (TOF) reached 10% of control when tracheal intubation was performed. Spontaneous recovery from neuromuscular blockade was allowed to occur until the first twitch returned to 25% of control. Patients then were randomized to receive cisatracurium as follows. Group 1: 0.025 mg/kg [0.5 × 95% effective dose (ED₉₅)]; Group 2: 0.05 mg/kg (ED₉₅); Group 3: 0.05 mg/kg (ED₉₅); and Group 4: 0.1 mg/kg (2×ED₉₅). Anesthesia for Groups 1 and 2 were maintained with isoflurane 1% to 2%, 66% nitrous oxide (N₂O) in oxygen (O₂), and in Groups 3 and 4, anesthesia was maintained with propofol 80 to 160 μg/kg/min, 66% N₂O in O₂. The TOF-evoked EMG was recorded at 10-second intervals. The time for the evoked EMG to spontaneously return to 25%, 50%, and 75% of the original baseline was recorded.

Measurements and Main Results: There were 10 patients in each of the four groups. The duration of action of cisatracurium 0.05 mg/kg (ED₉₅) after an intubating dose of succinylcholine is 24.5 ± 10 minutes and 21.3 ± 9 minutes during anesthesia maintained with isoflurane and propofol, respectively. Doubling the dose of cisatracurium resulted in approximately twice the duration of action (40.2 ± 7 min) during propofol anesthesia. Following a dose of cisatracurium 0.025 mg/kg (0.5×ED₉₅), the T₁ of the EMG-evoked response did not decrease below 25% in 7 of 10 patients.

Conclusion: Following succinylcholine, the duration of action of a single dose of cisatracurium 0.05 mg/kg is 20 to 25 minutes during anesthesia maintained with propofol or isoflurane. The duration and recovery profile of cisatracurium is dose dependent during propofol and isoflurane anesthetics. Cisatracurium 0.025 mg/kg is an inadequate maintenance dose following recovery from succinylcholine and it fails to provide adequate surgical relaxation.     

Assessment of tracheal intubating conditions in children using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxant

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation in children can be achieved by deep inhalational anaesthesia or an intravenous anaesthetic and a muscle relaxant, suxamethonium being widely used despite several side-effects. Studies have shown that oral intubation can be facilitated safely and effectively in children after induction of anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil without a muscle relaxant. Remifentanil is a new, ultra-short acting, selective mu-receptor agonist that is 20-30 times more potent than alfentanil. This clinical study was designed to assess whether combination of propofol and remifentanil could be used without a muscle relaxant to facilitate tracheal intubation in children. METHODS: Forty children (5-10 years) admitted for adenotonsillectomy were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive remifentanil 2 microg.kg(-1) (Gp I) or remifentanil 3 microg.kg(-1) (Gp II) before the induction of anaesthesia with i.v. propofol 3 mg.kg(-1). No neuromuscular blocking agent was administered. Intubating conditions were assessed using a four-point scoring system based on ease of laryngoscopy, jaw relaxation, position of vocal cords, degree of coughing and limb movement. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) measured noninvasively before induction of anaesthesia to 5 min after intubation (seven time points). RESULTS: Tracheal intubation was successful in all patients without requiring neuromuscular blocking agent. Intubating conditions were clinically acceptable in 10 of 20 patients (50%) in Gp I compared with 18 of 20 patients (90%) in Gp II (P < 0.05). MAP and HR decreased in both groups after induction of anaesthesia (P < 0.01). Both HR and MAP were significantly lower in Gp II compared with Gp I after tracheal intubation (P < 0.01). No patient in the present study developed bradycardia or hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that remifentanil (3 microg.kg(-1)), administered before propofol (3 mg.kg(-1)) provides acceptable tracheal intubating conditions in children, and completely inhibited the increase in HR and MAP associated with intubation.