Ross procedure in rheumatic aortic valve disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of aortic valve replacement with the pulmonary autograft in patients with rheumatic heart disease. METHODS: From October 1993 through September 2003, 81 rheumatic patients with aortic valve disease, mean age 29.5+/-11.9 years (11-56 years) underwent, the Ross procedure with root replacement technique. Forty patients were 30 years of age or below (young rheumatics). Associated procedures included mitral valve repair (n=19), open mitral commissurotomy (n=15), tricuspid valve repair (n=2), and homograft mitral valve replacement (n=2). RESULTS: Early mortality was 7.4% (six patients). Mean follow-up was 92.3+/-40.9 months (7-132 months, median 109 months). Sixty of the 73 patients whose follow-up was available (82%) had no significant aortic regurgitation. Re-operation was required in seven (8.4%) patients for autograft dysfunction with failed mitral valve repair (n=3), autograft dysfunction alone (n=2) and failed mitral valve repair alone (n=2). No re-operations were required for the pulmonary homograft. There were six (7.5%) late deaths. Actuarial survival and re-operation-free survival at 109 months were 84.5+/-4.1% and 90.5+/-3.7%, respectively. Freedom from significant aortic stenosis or regurgitation was 78.4+/-5.2% and event-free survival was 64.6+/-5.8%. When compared to rheumatics above 30 years of age, the relative risk of autograft dysfunction was high in the young rheumatics. CONCLUSION: The Ross procedure is not suitable for young patients with rheumatic heart disease. However, it provides acceptable mid-term results in carefully selected older (>30 years) patients with isolated rheumatic aortic valve disease.     

Results of mitral valve repair in rheumatic mitral regurgitation

Between January 1988 and December 2003, 898 patients with rheumatic heart disease (mean age 22.4+/-10.1 years) underwent mitral valve (MV) repair. Five hundred and sixty-five patients (63%) had pre-operative atrial fibrillation. Six hundred and ten (68%) patients were in NYHA class III or IV. Four hundred and twelve (45.9%) had pure mitral regurgitation (MR) and 486 (54.1%) had mixed mitral stenosis and MR. The pathology was leaflet prolapse (n=270, 30%), annular dilatation (n=717, 79.8%) and calcification (n=39, 4.3%). Reparative procedures included annuloplasty (n=793, 88%), commissurotomy (n=530, 59%), chordal shortening (n=225, 25%), cusp excision/plication (n=41, 4.5%), cuspal thinning (n=325, 36%), cleft suture (n=142, 16%), decalcification (n=30, 3.3%), chordal transfer (n=13, 1.4%), and neo chordae construction (n=3, 0.3%). Early mortality was 32 (3.6%). Follow-up ranged from 6 to 180 months (mean 62.7+/-31.8 months) and was 96% complete. Six hundred and twenty-one patients (69%) had no, or trivial, or mild MV. Two hundred and seventy-seven of the 866 survivors had MR which was moderate in 153 (18%) and severe in 124 (14%) patients. Thirty-five patients underwent re-operation. There were 21 late deaths (2.4%). Actuarial and re-operation-free survival at 10 years were 92+/-1.1% and 81+/-5.2%, respectively. Freedom from moderate or severe MR was 32+/-3.9%. MV repair in the rheumatic population is feasible with acceptable long-term results.     

Triple valve repair for young rheumatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Facing young foreign polyvalvular rheumatic patients, for which long-term anticoagulation is not available, we have chosen to attempt triple valve repair procedures in order to avoid prosthetic implantation in this particular population suffering from triple valve disease. METHODS: Twenty-one young rheumatic patients (mean age:11+/-4 years) underwent triple valve repair procedures including cusp extension on the aortic valve aortic between September, 1992 and December, 2000. Valvular pathology characteristics according to Carpentier's classification included mitral insufficiency type III post+II ant (n=10), type III post (n=4), type II ant (n=2), mitral stenosis (n=5), type III aortic insufficiency (n=21), type I (n=13) and type III (n=8) tricuspid insufficiency. RESULTS: Firstly, the mitral valve disease were corrected using Carpentier's techniques of repair: prosthetic ring annuloplasty (n=16), commissurotomy (n=12), chord transposition (n=11) or shortening (n=4), papillary muscle sliding plasty (n=4) and pericardial patch leaflet enlargement (n=6). Secondly, aortic lesions were corrected using glutaraldehyde stabilized autologous pericardium triple cusps extension technique (n=21). Lastly, tricuspid repairs were always performed on beating hearts using commissurotomy (n=8), prosthetic ring (n=12) or other techniques (n=9) of annuloplasty. The operative mortality was 4.7% (one patient died). Echocardiograms before discharge showed grade I mitral insufficiency in seven patients and grade I aortic insufficiency in five patients. There was no late death during a mean follow-up of 51+/-31 months. Two patients underwent valvular redo surgery because of aortic and mitral plasty deterioration due to rheumatic disease progress. After 5 years, 90% of the patients were free from redo valvular surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In rheumatic patients, autologous pericardial patch extension of the aortic valve permitted widespread use of reconstructive surgery even in patients suffering from triple valve disease. Triple valve repair, in this particular challenging setting of patients, has provided satisfactory initial and mid-term results and could be considered as an interesting palliative surgical approach.     

Midterm results of aortic valve repair with the pericardial cusp extension technique in rheumatic valve disease

BACKGROUND: The encouraging results of valve repair in the atrioventricular valves have influenced a decision about aortic valve (AV) reconstruction. We report our experience with pericardial cusp extension to repair rheumatic AV disease. METHODS: From 1993 to 1998, 46 patients (25 women, 21 men) with a mean age of 31.5 +/- 12.2 years (range, 15 to 58 years) underwent AV repair. Twenty-two (47.8%) patients had moderate and 24 (52.2%) had severe aortic insufficiency (AI). Severe cusp retraction was repaired with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium. Twenty-one patients had more than one maneuver (mean, 1.8) to attain competence besides augmentation, which consisted of the release of stenotic commissures (in 11 cases), thinning of the AV cusps (in 10 cases), and resuspension of the cusps (in 17 cases). Simultaneous mitral valve repair was performed on 17 patients. Eight patients received triple valve reconstruction. RESULTS: There was no early mortality. Thirty patients no longer had AI with any significant transvalvular gradients. Five patients were followed with mild residual AI, and 2 patients with moderate AI not requiring reoperation. Nine patients developing severe AI required AV replacement with a reoperation rate 19.6% (4.26%/patient-year). The mean interval between repair and reoperation was 28.2 +/- 18.3 months (range, 3 to 58 months). The mean observation time was 4.6 +/- 3 years (211.6 patient-years). Late mortality rate was 2.2% with 1 patient. The significant negative predictors of aortic reoperation determined by univariate analysis were preoperative New York Heart Association class (p = 0.002) and postoperative severe AI (p < 0.001). Cox hazard studies identified that all risk factors were insignificant for aortic reoperation. The actuarial rate of freedom from aortic reoperation was 76.1% +/- 7% at 7.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although AV repair by extension with pericardium is worth considering with an acceptable solution to achieve a good geometry from unequal cusps, especially in young rheumatic patients for preservation of the native AV, the patients should be followed periodically for reoperation risk.     

Aortic valve repair by cusp extension with the use of fresh autologous pericardium in children with rheumatic aortic insufficiency.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to evaluate the midterm results of aortic valve repair by a more sophisticated tailoring of cusp extension-taking into account the dimensions of the native aortic cusps-with the use of fresh autologous pericardium. Patients and methods: Forty-one children who had severe rheumatic aortic insufficiency (mean age 11.5 +/- 2.7 years) underwent aortic valve repair by means of this cusp extension technique over a 5-year period. Twenty-four of them underwent concomitant mitral valve repair for associated rheumatic mitral valve disease. All children were then followed up by transthoracic echocardiography before discharge, at 3 and 6 months after the operation, and at yearly intervals thereafter. RESULTS: Follow-up was complete in all patients and ranged from 3 months to 5 years (median 3 years). No operative and no early postoperative deaths occurred. Only 1 patient died, 9 months after the operation, of septicemia and multiple organ failure. Actuarial survival was 97% at 1 year and has remained unchanged at 3 years. On discharge, the degree of aortic insufficiency was grade 0 for 27 children and grade I for 14. Exacerbation of aortic insufficiency from grade I to grade II was observed in only 1 patient, and none of the children required reoperation for aortic insufficiency during the follow-up period. Mean peak systolic aortic valve gradients at discharge were lower than preoperative values (P =.04), and no significant increase in the peak systolic transvalvular gradient was detected thereafter during the follow-up period. Mean left ventricular dimensions were significantly reduced at discharge when compared with preoperative values (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Functional results of aortic valve repair with cusp extension using fresh pericardium have been satisfactory at medium term, particularly in children with a small aortic anulus at the time of initial repair, because the expansion potential of fresh autologous pericardium is equivalent to that of the growing sinotubular junction and aortic anulus diameters.     

Open mitral commissurotomy in the current era: indications,technique, and results

BACKGROUND: The present retrospective study is focused on indications, techniques, and results of open mitral commisurotomy in the current era. METHODS: Of the 1,280 patients undergoing open-heart surgical procedures for rheumatic mitral stenosis between January 1990 and July 2000, 276 (21.6%) patients underwent open mitral commissurotomy. Major indications included presence of left atrial thrombus/clot (n = 82, 29.7%), severe subvalvular disease (n = 110, 39.8%), mitral valve calcification (n = 42, 15.2%), mild mitral regurgitation (n = 28, 10.0%), associated aortic valve disease (n = 55, 19.9%), organic tricuspid valve disease (n = 20, 7.2%), and failure or restenosis after closed or balloon mitral valvuloplasty (n = 55, 19.9%). Age of patients ranged from 7 to 67 years (mean, 30.2 +/- 12 years). The majority (76%) were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, and 6.9% were in congestive heart failure. Atrial fibrillation was present in 134 (48.6%) patients. Mitral valve area ranged from 0.3 to 0.7 cm2 (mean, 0.52 +/- 0.12 cm2). Mid-diastolic gradients across the mitral valve ranged from 8 to 34 mm Hg (mean, 14.5 +/- 6.2 mm Hg), and end-diastolic gradients ranged from 8 to 42 mm Hg (mean, 15.2 +/- 5.7 mm Hg). Open mitral commissurotomy was performed using standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Associated aortic valve procedure was performed in 55 patients, and either tricuspid valvotomy or repair was performed in 28 patients. RESULTS: There were four early deaths. All these patients had associated aortic valve procedure (Ross procedure in 2 and homograft aortic valve replacement in 2). Three patients developed severe mitral regurgitation in early postoperative period (< or = 30 days) and required reoperation. Predischarge echocardiography showed mitral valve area from 1.4 to 3.5 cm2 (mean, 2.6 +/- 0.6cm2) and moderate mitral regurgitation in 4 patients. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 130 months (mean, 64.5 +/- 28.6 months). There was no late death. There were three reoperations for mitral valve failure, and an additional 2 patients developed severe mitral stenosis (mitral valve area < 1.0 cm2). In operative survivors, freedom from mitral valve failure at 10 years was 87.0% +/- 3.5%. In patients with isolated open mitral commissurotomy, the incidence of thromboembolism was 0.5%/patient-year. CONCLUSIONS: Open mitral commissurotomy provides excellent early and long-term results in a selected group of patients.     

Mitral valve repair and replacement for rheumatic disease

OBJECTIVES: Mitral valve repair may be technically feasible in patients with suitable anatomy, but the appropriateness of repair for rheumatic disease remains controversial. We evaluated our late outcomes after mitral repair and replacement for rheumatic disease. METHODS: Five hundred seventy-three patients underwent mitral valve surgery for rheumatic disease at our institution from 1978-1995. Follow-up was 98% complete (mean, 68 +/- 46 months). Survival and morbidity were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression, including propensity score analysis. RESULTS: Mean age was 54 +/- 14 years, 55% of patients had congestive heart failure, 22% were undergoing redo mitral valve surgery, and 9% also underwent coronary bypass. Mitral stenosis was present in 53%, regurgitation in 15%, and both in 32%. Valve repair was performed in 25%, bioprosthetic replacement was performed in 28%, and a mechanical valve was placed in 47%. Patients undergoing repair were younger and less likely to be undergoing reoperation or to have atrial fibrillation than those undergoing replacement (P =.001). The operative mortality rate was 4. 2%. Better late cardiac survival was independently predicted by valve repair rather than replacement (P =.04) after adjustment for baseline differences between patients. Freedom from reoperation was greatest (P =.005) but that from thromboembolic complications was worst (P <.0001) after mechanical valve replacement. Twenty-three patients underwent reoperation after initial repair, with no operative deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical valves minimize reoperation but limit survival and increase thromboembolic complications. Patients undergoing valve repair had improved late cardiac survival independent of their preoperative characteristics. Rheumatic mitral valves should be repaired when technically feasible, accepting a risk of reoperation, to maximize survival and reduce morbidity.     

Durability and outcome of aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair versus double valve replacement

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate morbidity and mortality after double valve replacement (DVR) and aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair (AVR + MVP). METHODS: From 1977 to 2000, 379 patients underwent DVR (n = 299) or AVR + MVP (n = 80). Actuarial survival and freedom from reoperation were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential predictors of mortality and reoperation were entered into a Cox multiple regression model. Propensity score was introduced for the multivariable regression modeling for adjustment of a selection bias. RESULTS: Survival 15 years after surgery was similar between the groups (DVR, 81% +/- 3%; AVR + MVP, 79% +/- 7%; p = 0.44). Freedom from thromboembolic event at 15 years was similar between the groups (p = 0.25). Freedom from mitral valve reoperation at 15 years was significantly better for the DVR group (54% +/- 5%) as compared with the AVR + MVP group (15% +/- 6%; p = 0.0006), primarily due to progression of mitral valve pathology and early structural deterioration of bioprosthetic aortic valve used for patients with AVR + MVP. After AVR + MVP, freedom from mitral reoperation at 15 years was 63% +/- 16% for nonrheumatic heart diseases, and 5% +/- 5% for rheumatic disease (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although both DVR and AVR + MVP provided excellent survival, DVR with mechanical valves should be the procedure of choice for the majority of patients because of lower incidence of valve failure and similar rate of thromboembolic complications compared with AVR + MVP. MVP should not be performed in patients with rheumatic disease because of higher incidence of late failure.     

Mitral valve repair with aortic valve replacement is superior to double valve replacement

OBJECTIVES: Double valve replacement has been advocated for patients with combined aortic and mitral valve disease. This study investigated the alternative that, when feasible, mitral valve repair with aortic valve replacement is superior. Patients and Methods: From 1975 to 1998, 813 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with either mitral valve replacement (n = 518) or mitral valve repair (n = 295). Mitral valve disease was rheumatic in 71% and degenerative in 20%. Mitral valve replacement was more common in patients with severe mitral stenosis (P =.0009), atrial fibrillation (P =.0006), and in patients receiving a mechanical aortic prosthesis (P =.0002). These differences were used for propensity-matched multivariable comparisons. Follow-up extended reliably to 16 years, mean 6.9 +/- 5.9 years. RESULTS: Hospital mortality rate was 5.4% for mitral valve repair and 7.0% for replacement (P =.4). Survivals at 5, 10, and 15 years were 79%, 63%, and 46%, respectively, after mitral valve repair versus 72%, 52%, and 34%, respectively, after replacement (P =.01). Late survival was increased by mitral valve repair rather than replacement (P =.03) in all subsets of patients, including those with severe mitral valve stenosis. After repair of nonrheumatic mitral valves, 5-, 10-, and 15-year freedom from valve replacement was 91%, 88%, and 86%, respectively; in contrast, after repair of rheumatic valves, it was 97%, 89%, and 75% at these intervals. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with double valve disease, aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair (1) are feasible in many, (2) improve late survival rates, and (3) are the preferred strategy when mitral valve repair is possible.     

Midterm outcome of mitral valve repair for congenital mitral regurgitation in infants and children

We analyzed the midterm results of children undergoing mitral valve repair without the use of prosthetic materials focusing on mitral annulus growth. From 1991 to 2004, 17 children (median age: 11 months) underwent mitral valve repair (grade III=9, IV=8). Regurgitation was due to prolapsed leaflet in 8 patients, annular dilatation in 4, and restrictive leaflet motion in 5. Preoperative indexed mitral valve diameter and Z-value were compared with those obtained at follow-up. There were no early or late deaths. All patients had an improved regurgitation grade after surgery. MV repair resulted in reduction in the indexed mitral valve diameter (58.2+/-22.9 vs. 47.3+/-18.9 mm/m2, P<0.05) and Z-value (3.3+/-2.3 vs. 0.79+/-2.2, P<0.05). One patient underwent re-repair, but no patients required mitral valve replacement during the median follow-up period of 95 months. The latest regurgitation grade was absent or I in 4 patients, II in 10 patients, and III in 3 patients. Mitral valve annulus increased by 23% at 3 years and by 49% at 5 years compared with that at surgery. Mitral valve repair without the use of prosthetic materials is feasible for the majority of patients and carries an appropriate growth pattern of the mitral valve annulus after surgery.     

Reoperations in valvular heart disease

Background Reoperations for valvular heart disease are associated with a higher overall mortality than the primary operations. In this retrospective analysis, we present our experience of reoperative valvular heart surgery over a period of 25 years. Methods From January 1975 to July 2000, 13039 operations were performed for valvular heart disease. Of these 665 were reoperations. The mean age of the patients at the primary operation was 24.0±10.2 years (range: 8 to 65 years) and at re-operation was 35.6±11.6 years (range: 9 to 65 years) with an interval of 9.4±2.2 years (range: 0.2 to 25 years) between the 2 procedures. Four hundred and forty reoperations were performed following a previous closed mitral valvotomy and procedures included, redo closed mitral valvotomy (n=28), mitral valve replacement (n=30), open mitral commissurotomy (n=51), mitral valve repair (n=9), homograft mitral valve replacement (n=2), double valve replacement (n=47), aortic valve replacement (n=2) and homograft aortic valve replacement plus open mitral commissurotomy (n=l). Eighty six patients underwent reoperations following mitral valve replacement. Valve thrombosis (n=50) and endocarditis (n=10) were principle causes of reoperation. Forty three patients required reoperation following failed mitral valve repair, 19 following open mitral commissurotomy and 8 following homograft mitral valve replacement. Sixty five patients underwent reoperation following aortic valve operations: prosthetic aortic valve replacement in 43, homograft aortic valve replacement in 5, aortic valve repair in 10, and Ross procedure in 7. Results Majority of patients were operated through midsternotomy. Aortic cannulation was possible in all but 4 patients in whom femoral artery cannulation was required. Operative mortality following reoperations was 7.5% (n=50). Peri-operative bleeding, low cardiac output and infective endocarditis were major causes of operative deaths. Other post-operative complications included cerebrovascular accident (n=3), acute renal failure (n=10) and jaundice (n=25). Fifteen patients developed significant wound infection. Conclusions Patients undergoing operation for valvular heart disease frequently require reoperation. Reoperative valvular heart surgery is safe and can be undertaken with acceptable mortality and morbidity.     

Surgical treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation combined with rheumatic mitral valve disease: Effects of the cryo-maze procedure and predictors for late recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the modified maze procedure using cryoablation for treating chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease and to assess the risk factors for late failure of sinus rhythm restoration. METHODS: Between March 2000 and June 2004, 170 consecutive patients, who underwent the modified maze procedure using cryoablation concomitant with mitral valve surgery for atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease, were divided into two groups based on the type of right-sided maze: the modified Cox-maze III (CM group, n=93) and modified Kosakai-maze (KM group, n = 77) procedures. The postoperative and mid-term follow-up results were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the risk factors for late recurrence of atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: There were three in-hospital deaths, including two in the CM group (2.2%) and one in the KM group (1.3%), and there were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. The cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were significantly shorter in the KM group than the CM group. At discharge, the sinus rhythm rate was 70% in the CM group and 74% in the KM group (p = 0.55). Follow-up was completed in 97% of the patients, with a mean time of 26.6+/-15.2 months. At the latest follow-up, one death occurred in the CM group (0.6%). Sinus rhythm was documented in 141 (84%) out of all the patients, including 76 (84%) in the CM group and 65 (86%) in the KM group (p=0.72). The 4-year actuarial survival free from stroke was 90.3+/-5.9% for the CM group and 96.4+/-3.5% for the KM group (p = 0.68), and 4-year event-free survival was 81.2+/-7.4% for the CM group and 96.4+/-3.5% for the KM group (p = 0.078). Using a multivariate analysis, a left atrial dimension >65 mm (p = 0.011) and repair for rheumatic mitral valve disease (p = 0.038) were independent risk factors for a late recurrence of AF. CONCLUSIONS: The modified maze procedures using cryoablation are safe and effective in treating chronic atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease.     

Mitral valve replacement with mechanical prostheses in children: improved operative risk and survival.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the early and late outcome following mitral valve replacement (MVR) with mechanical prostheses in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1981 and 2000, 44 consecutive children (mean age 6.8+/-4.7 years, 2 months--16 years) underwent mechanical MVR in Southampton. Twenty-three children were less than 5-years-old and nine were infants. Disease aetiology was congenital in 37, rheumatic in four, infective in two and Marfan's syndrome in one. Mitral regurgitation was present in 36 and mitral stenosis in eight. Concomitant procedures were performed in 13, including aortic valve replacement (AVR) in seven. Follow-up was complete (mean 6.4+/-4.8 years, 1 month--18.1 years). RESULTS: The overall operative mortality was 14% (six patients). Before and after 1990 operative mortality was 31 vs 3.6% (P=0.02). From 1990, operative mortality for infants was zero out of six, for children less than 5-years-old was one out of 16 (one death after emergency AVR and MVR) and for older children it was 0/12. Seven children experienced valve or anticoagulation treatment-related events and eight had a mitral valve re-operation. Ten-year freedom from thromboembolism, prosthetic valve infection, bleeding, paravalvular leak and a mitral valve re-operation was 92.8+/-5.2, 97.3+/-2.7, 97.7+/-2.3, 97.2+/-2.7 and 75+/-9.7%, respectively. Overall 10-year survival was 78+/-7% (four late deaths); for children under vs over 5 years it was 61+/-11 vs 95.2+/-4.6% (P=0.02), for atrio-ventricular septal defect (AVSD) vs other pathology 55+/-15 vs 89+/-6.1% (P=0.05) and for those operated before 1990 vs after 1990 it was 63+/-8.1 vs 86+/-8.2% (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical MVR, in the current era, carries a low operative risk across the spectrum of paediatric age. Late survival is better for older children and those having no-AVSD pathology but it has improved substantially during the 1990s irrespective of age and disease aetiology.     

Anomalous coronary artery origin from the pulmonary artery: correlation between surgical timing and left ventricular function recovery

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the correlation between surgical timing and 15-year longitudinal left ventricular and mitral valve function, after repair of anomalous coronary artery origin from the pulmonary artery. METHODS: Between 1987 and 2002, 31 patients (median age, 7.1 months) underwent repair for anomalous origin of the left (n = 28), right (n = 2), or both (n = 1) coronary arteries from the pulmonary artery. Repair was accomplished by subclavian interposition in 5 patients, intrapulmonary tunnel in 12, and direct aortic reimplantation in 14. Primary mitral valve repair was never associated with coronary revascularization. Total follow-up was 186.4 patient-years (mean, 77.2 months). RESULTS: Fifteen-year actuarial survival was 92.9% +/- 4.9% for coronary transfer, 40.0% +/- 21.9% for subclavian interposition, and 89.9% +/- 7.5% for intrapulmonary tunnel (p = 0.019). Five patients required further intervention for supravalvular pulmonary stenosis (n = 3), baffle leak (n = 1), and mitral valve replacement (n = 1). Coronary transfer allowed best freedom from long-term reoperation (92.3% +/- 7.4%). Left ventricular shortening fraction increased from 17.3% +/- 6.3% before operation to 34.1% +/- 4.6% at last follow-up (p < 0.01). Regression analysis demonstrated a linear relationship between age at repair and shortening fraction recovery (r(2) = 0.573, p < 0.01). Patients younger than 6 months of age showed worse preoperative shortening fraction (15.9% +/- 5.2%) and best longitudinal shortening fraction recovery (36.4% +/- 5.1%; p < 0.001). Major improvement in mitral valve function was observed within 1 year from surgery in 90.4% of survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of anomalous coronary artery origin from the pulmonary artery in younger symptomatic infants offers the best potential for recovery of left ventricular function, despite a worse initial presentation. Coronary transfer is associated with superior long-term survival and freedom from reoperation. Most patients with patent two-coronary repair will recover normal mitral valve function; therefore, simultaneous mitral valve surgery seems unwarranted.     

Surgical repair for degenerative and rheumatic mitral valve disease. Operative and mid-term results

BACKGROUND: Non randomized studies suggest that mitral valve repair for rheumatic disease is technically more difficult than repair for degenerative disease, and that operative and late results are worse. New surgical techniques have been developed in our and other institutes during the last 5 years, and this moved us to review the experience with these two pathologies and to compare the operative and mid-term RESULTS: METHODS: From March 1996 to September 1997, 66 patients underwent primary mitral valve repair for treatment of degenerative or rheumatic disease. Fifty-two patients (79%) were in the former group (group A) and 14 in the latter (group B). Surgery was performed by 2 experienced cardiac surgeons. A new technique to calculate the exact artificial chordae length was introduced. In 2 cases, tricuspid autografts were transposed to mitral position and reinforced with artificial chordae. Patients were followed both clinically and echocardiographically. The follow-up data were collected in a 1-month period (May 2000). The average clinical follow-up was 3.1+/-0.9 years (range 1.7 to 4.2 years) while the average echocardiographic follow-up was 2.7+/-0.7 years (range 9 months to 4 years). All values were expressed by means of the average and standard deviation. chi(2) and Student's "t"-test were used to analyze the significance between variables. The Kaplan-Meyer method was used for actuarial statistics. RESULTS: There were no operative deaths in either group. In group A, 1 patient underwent a second surgical repair 1 week later, successfully. In group B no patients underwent reoperation within 30 days or during the initial hospitalization. At follow-up of group A there were the following events: deaths from cancer (n=2), endocarditis (n=1), aortic dissection (n=1). At follow-up of group B there were mitral valve replacement (1 year after first operation, n=1), Ross procedure (n=1), ischemic heart failure (n=1). Among the remaining 62 patients followed, 32 were in NYHA class I, 15 in class II, 3 in class III, and none in class IV, in group A. In group B, 7 patients were in class I, 4 in class II, 1 in class III and none in class IV (p=ns). In group A mitral regurgitation was absent in 23 patients, mild in 21, moderate in 6, while in group B it was absent in 4, mild in 6, and moderate in 2 (p=ns). In both groups there were no cases of severe insufficiency. The mean gradient was 1.1+/-1.7 mmHg in group A (median=0), and 2.4+/-3.1 mmHg in group B (median=0), (p=ns). No case of systolic anterior movement was seen at mid-term. The event free-survival rate was 92.8% in group A and 92.3% in B. CONCLUSIONS: Perfecting and innovation of surgical techniques make possible nowadays to reach good and equivalent operative and mid-term results in both pathologies.     

Homograft replacement of the mitral valve: eight-year results

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether the mitral homograft represents a valuable alternative for complete or partial mitral valve replacement. METHODS: Since 1993, 104 patients underwent mitral homograft replacement surgery. The mean age was 38 +/- 15 years. The causes of mitral valve disease were rheumatic disease (n = 76), infective endocarditis (n = 24), and others (n = 4). Sixty-five of these procedures were total homografts, and 39 were partial homografts. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 52 +/- 35 months (maximum, 117 months). Overall hospital mortality was 4 (3.8%) of 104 patients and 2.5% versus 8.7% for patients without endocarditis and with endocarditis, respectively (P <.19). There were 9 late deaths (cardiac, 4; noncardiac, 5). There have been 5 early (<3 months) and 10 late reoperations. Of the remaining 77 patients, New York Heart Association class was I in 61, II in 14, and III in 2. Four patients had endocarditis, and 5 had an ischemic or hemorrhagic event. Freedom from major cardiac events was 71% +/- 6% at 8 years (partial at 81% vs total at 63%, P <.19). Among patients with a total homograft, freedom from major cardiac events was 61% +/- 9% and 85% +/- 8% at 6 years in patients younger than and older than 40 years, respectively (P =.09). CONCLUSION: The risk of early dysfunction related to a mismatch between the mitral homograft and the patient's valve is the main pitfall of the technique. Beyond that stage, the results were comparable with those of bioprostheses in a cohort of young patients.     

Homograft mitral valve replacement: five years' results

OBJECTIVE: Results of mitral valve replacement with a mitral homograft were evaluated at 5 years to assess the suitability of the procedure. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (25 male subjects) aged 10 to 49 years (mean, 32 +/- 10 years) with rheumatic mitral valve disease underwent total (n = 35) or partial (n = 2) mitral valve replacement with a fresh antibiotic-preserved (n = 23) or cryopreserved (n = 14) mitral homograft. The predominant lesion was mitral stenosis (n = 30). RESULTS: There were 5 early deaths. Operative survivors were followed up for 1 to 60 months (mean, 26.6 +/- 12 months). Among these, 21 patients had severe mitral regurgitation during the follow-up period; 3 died and 8 underwent reoperation. The homograft failure rate was not affected by preoperative physiologic lesion (stenosis vs regurgitation, P =.4), type of homograft (antibiotic-preserved vs cryopreserved homograft, P =.9), papillary muscle pretreatment (yes vs no, P =.9), or addition of posterior collar annuloplasty (yes vs no, P =.2). Among the remaining patients, 5 had moderate mitral regurgitation, 4 had either trivial or mild mitral regurgitation, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Study of the explanted mitral homografts (n = 8) revealed that disruption of one of the donor papillary muscles was responsible for early failures (n = 2), whereas cuspal and chordal degeneration was responsible for late failures (n = 6). Microscopically, the explanted valve lacked any viable cellular elements, and there was no evidence of immunologic injury to the homografts. CONCLUSION: The mitral homograft did not fulfill our expectations as a suitable substitute for the diseased mitral valve.     

Early and late results of mitral valve repair for mitral valve regurgitation. Significant risk factors of reoperation

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair for mitral valve regurgitation has many advantages over mitral valve replacement. However, durability and reoperation after mitral valve repair still remain major problems. We examined the outcome of mitral valve repair for mitral valve regurgitation and analyzed several pre- and intraoperative potential risk factors to determine the significant risk factors of reoperation. METHODS: From February 1981 to November 1996, 86 patients underwent mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation or combined mitral regurgitation and stenosis. The mean age was 53 years, and 88.4% were New York Heart Association class III or IV. The causes of mitral valve disease were degenerative disease in 53 patients, rheumatic disease in 15, infective endocarditis in 11, and ischemic disease in 7. There were 2 early and 8 late deaths. RESULTS: Actuarial overall survival including early death at 10 years was 83.2+/-6.1%, freedom from reoperation was 86.8+/-5.3%, freedom from thromboembolism was 90.9+/-6.2%, and freedom from infective endocarditis was 98.5+/-1.5%. There was no bleeding event. At the last follow-up, most patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II. Prolapse of anterior leaflet and rheumatic mitral regurgitation were identified as independent predictors for reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: The repair techniques for anterior leaflet prolapse and patient selection in rheumatic mitral disease are important for improving long-term results of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation.     

Hemolysis after mitral valve repair: mechanisms and treatment

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to determine the mechanisms of hemolysis after mitral valve repair and to determine outcomes after surgical treatment (mitral replacement or re-repair). METHODS: Between 1981 and 2002, 32 patients (mean age, 58 years) presented with hemolytic anemia after mitral valve repair for degenerative, rheumatic, or ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR). Three types of annuloplasty were used at the initial mitral valve repair: Cosgrove-Edwards, Carpentier-Edwards, and bovine pericardial (Perigard). The diagnosis and the mechanisms of hemolysis were investigated with laboratory testing and echocardiography. RESULTS: Median interval from initial mitral valve surgery to diagnosis of hemolysis was 3 months (range, 1 week to 4 years). At presentation, mean hematocrit was 27.5% +/- 4.9% and 22 patients (69%) required transfusion. Echocardiographic findings varied. Twenty-four patients (77%) had grade 3 or 4 MR. Mitral regurgitant jet types included fragmentation (11 patients, 34%), acceleration (10, 31%), slow deceleration (5, 16%), collision (4, 13%), and free jet (2, 6%). Mitral valve replacement was performed in 28 patients, mitral valve re-repair in 3, and 1 patient did not undergo reoperation. At reoperation the mitral valve repair was physically intact in 25 of 31 patients (81%). There were 2 hospital deaths in patients having reoperation (6%). Actuarial survival was 95% at 1 year and 85% at 5 years. In 1 patient recurrent mechanical hemolysis developed caused by a perivalvular leak after mitral valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Hemolysis is a mode of failure of mitral valve repair. Patients with hemolysis generally present within 3 months of mitral valve repair. Although echocardiographic features varied, most patients had high-grade MR and regurgitant jets that fragmented or accelerated. Mitral valve replacement yields favorable outcomes for patients with hemolysis after mitral valve repair.     

Factors affecting mitral valve reoperation in 317 survivors after mitral valve reconstruction.

From a very heterogeneous group of 340 patients undergoing mitral valve reconstruction from 1969 through 1988, 313 hospital survivors were analyzed for factors affecting the occurrence of reoperative mitral valve procedures related to native mitral valve dysfunction. Follow-up was 100% and extended from 1 year to 20 years (mean follow-up, 7.2 years). Sixty-three patients (18.5% of the 340) required mitral valve reoperation at a mean postoperative interval of 6 years (range, 1 to 15 years). Incremental risk factors analyzed for the event late mitral valve failure included age, sex, preoperative New York Heart Association class, cause of valvular disease, pathophysiology of the mitral valve, previous mitral valve operation, mitral valve pathology, and estimation of mitral valve function at operation after repair. Mitral valve pathophysiology affected the actuarial freedom from mitral valve replacement (p = 0.023 [log-rank]). Actuarial freedom from mitral valve reoperation was 90% at 5 years and 80% at 8 years in patients who had either pure mitral regurgitation or isolated mitral stenosis compared with 80% and 72% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, in patients who had mixed mitral stenosis and regurgitation (p = 0.023). Patients undergoing late reoperation were younger (51.7 +/- 1.56 years [+/- the standard error of the mean]) than those not having reoperation (p less than 0.0003). Durability of the repair was less in patients with rheumatic heart disease (p less than 0.025) and greater in patients with ischemic heart disease (p less than 0.004). Seventy-three percent of patients undergoing reoperation had concomitant operations compared with 68% of those not having reoperation (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)