Stereoselectivity in drug metabolism

Many chiral drugs are used as their racemic mixtures in clinical practice. Two enantiomers of a chiral drug generally differ in pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic properties as a consequence of the stereoselective interaction with optically active biological macromolecules. Thus, a stereospecific assay to discriminate between enantiomers is required in order to relate plasma concentrations to pharmacological effect of a chiral drug. Stereoselective metabolism of drugs is most commonly the major contributing factor to stereoselectivity in pharmacokinetics. Metabolizing enzymes often display a preference for one enantiomer of a chiral drug over the other, resulting in enantioselectivity. The structural characteristics of enzymes dictate the enantiomeric discrimination associated with the metabolism of chiral drugs. The stereoselectivity can, therefore, be viewed as the physical property characteristic that phenotypes the enzyme. This review provides a comprehensive appraisal of stereochemical aspects of drug metabolism (i.e., enantioselective metabolism and first-pass effect, enzyme-selective inhibition or induction and drug interaction, species differences and polymorphic metabolism).     

Chirality and pharmacokinetics: an area of neglected dimensionality?

Drug stereochemistry has, until relatively recently, been an area of neglected dimensionality with the development of the majority of synthetic chiral drugs as racemates. This situation has changed in recent years as a result of advances in the chemical technologies associated with the synthesis, analysis and preparative scale resolution of the enantiomers of chiral molecules. As a result of the application of these technologies the potential significance of the differential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the enantiomers present in a racemate have become appreciated. Many of the processes involved in drug disposition, i.e. absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion, involve a direct interaction with chiral biological macromolecules, e.g. transporters, membrane lipids and enzymes, and following administration of a racemate the individual enantiomers frequently exhibit different pharmacokinetic profiles and rarely exist in a 1:1 ratio in biological fluids. The magnitude of the differences between a pair of enantiomers observed in their pharmacokinetic parameters tends to be relatively modest in comparison to their pharmacodynamic properties. However, the observed stereoselectivity may be either amplified or attenuated depending on the organisational level, e.g. whole body, organ or macromolecular, the particular parameter represents. Differences in parameters involving a direct interaction between a drug enantiomer and a biological macromolecule, e.g. intrinsic metabolite formation clearance and fraction unbound, tend to be largest, and comparison of parameters reflecting the whole body level of organisation, e.g. half-life, clearance, volume of distribution, may well mask significant stereoselectivity at the macromolecular level. In spite of the recent interest in drug chirality relatively limited pharmacokinetic data are available for the enantiomers of a number of commonly used racemic drugs. Factors influencing the stereo-selectivity of drug disposition include: formulation and route of administration; in vivo stereochemical stability, both chemical and enzymatic; drug interactions, both enantiomeric and with a second drug; disease state; age; gender; race; and pharmacogenetics. As a result of such factors estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters, development of complex pharmacokinetic models and plasma-concentration-effect relationships based on 'total' drug concentrations following administration of a racemate are of limited value and potentially useless.     

Stereochemical Aspects of Pharmacotherapy

Over the past 15 years stereoselectivity has become a well-recognized consideration in clinical pharmacology. Drugs that have an asymmetric center or plane of symmetry within their molecular structure are said to be chiral. They are available as pairs of nonsuperimposable mirror images, called enantiomers, that share essentially the same physicochemical properties. These three-dimensional structural differences, however, can translate into enantiospecific pharmacologic or pharmacokinetic properties, which may be important in understanding the clinical pharmacology of chiral drugs. Most chiral drugs are available as the racemate, in which equal proportions of the two enantiomers are administered concurrently. The pharmacologic and disposition properties of many chiral drugs are documented to be stereo-specific, and this has influenced the regulatory requirements for the approval of new drug candidates. Due to this influence on new drug development, the possible issues surrounding racemic drugs will undoubtedly affect the types of pharmaceuticals that are used clinically in the next century. Accordingly, considerable advances have been made in producing optically pure drug. It should be emphasized, however, that stereochemically pure drugs are not necessarily superior to the respective racemates.     

Impact of stereoselectivity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiarrhythmic drugs

Many antiarrhythmic drugs introduced into the market during the past three decades have a chiral centre in their structure and are marketed as racemates. Most of these agents, including disopyramide, encainide, flecainide, mexiletine, propafenone and tocainide, belong to class I antiarrhythmics, whereas verapamil is a class IV antiarrhythmic agent. Except for encainide and flecainide, there is substantial stereoselectivity in one or more of the pharmacological actions of chiral antiarrhythmics, with the activity of enantiomers differing by as much as 100-fold or more for some of these drugs. The absorption of chiral antiarrhythmics appears to be nonstereoselective. However, their distribution, metabolism and renal excretion usually favour one enantiomer versus the other. In terms of distribution, plasma protein binding is stereoselective for most of these drugs, resulting in up to two-fold differences between the enantiomers in their unbound fractions in plasma and volume of distribution. For disopyramide, stereoselective plasma protein binding is further complicated by nonlinearity in the binding at therapeutic concentrations. Hepatic metabolism plays a significant role in the elimination of these antiarrhythmics, accounting for >90% of the elimination of mexiletine, propafenone and verapamil. Additionally, in most cases, significant stereoselectivity is observed in different pathways of metabolism of these drugs. For some drugs, such as propafenone and verapamil, the stereoselectivity in metabolism is further complicated by nonlinearity in one or more of the metabolic pathways. Further, the metabolism of a number of chiral antiarrhythmics, such as mexiletine, propafenone, encainide and flecainide, cosegregates with debrisoquine/sparteine hydroxylation phenotype. Therefore, it is not surprising that a wide interindividual variability exists in the metabolism of these drugs. Excretion of the unchanged enantiomers in urine is an important pathway for the elimination of disopyramide, flecainide and tocainide. The renal clearances of both disopyramide and flecainide exceed the filtration rate for these drugs, suggesting the involvement of active tubular secretion. However, the stereoselectivity in the renal clearance of these drugs, if any, is minimal. Similarly, there is no stereoselectivity in the renal clearance of tocainide, a drug that undergoes tubular reabsorption in addition to glomerular filtration. Overall, substantial stereoselectivity has been observed in both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chiral antiarrhythmic agents. Because the effects of these drugs are related to their plasma concentrations, this information is of special clinical relevance.     

Stereoselective drug disposition: potential for misinterpretation of drug disposition data.

1. Although it is well recognised that the enantiomers of a chiral drug may possess different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, many studies dealing with chiral drugs which are administered as their racemates rely on non-stereoselective analytical techniques. 2. We present a theoretical analysis to illustrate the potential which exists for misinterpretation of drug disposition and plasma drug concentration-effect data generated for a racemic drug using a non-stereoselective assay. 3. It was shown that the use of such an analytical method can lead to the collection of data which may be both quantitatively and qualitatively inaccurate with respect to the individual enantiomers. For example, the clearance of the unresolved drug may indicate concentration- and time-dependence even though this pharmacokinetic process is concentration- and time-independent for each of the enantiomers. 4. The problems discussed emphasise the need to consider stereoselectivity in clinical pharmacological studies involving racemic drugs.     

手性药物对映体在药效学与药代动力学的相互作用

当手性药物以外消旋体供药用时，其对映体间就可能发生药效学和药代动力学的相互作用。本文综述了手性药物对映体间的药效学和药代动力学相互作用及其对手性药物药效学和药代动力学立体选择性的影响。     

CYP3A4 and MDR Mediated Interactions in Drug Therapy

Multiple drug therapy is recommended in many disease states including AIDS, cancer, diabetes, and stroke. Therefore, drug-drug interactions can result in changes in pharmacological or toxicological response following concomitant administration of many therapeutic agents. It has become evident that two factors i.e. drug efflux pump- P-glycoprotein (MDR gene product) and metabolizing enzyme- CYP3A4 play major roles in this process. These two key proteins regulate all pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions through the process of drug absorption, metabolism, disposition and elimination. Co-administration of two or more drugs can affect these processes due to altered functions of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A4 and consequently change clinical response and final outcome. After co-administration, some drugs may induce the activity of P-gp and/or CYP3A4 resulting in subtherapeutic blood levels and therapeutic failure due to reduced absorption and/or increased metabolism. Conversely, inhibition(s) of P-gp and/or CYP3A4 can cause enhanced plasma concentration and therefore, drug toxicity. Overlapping substrate specificities to these proteins make it difficult to understand perplexing pharmacokinetic interactions with multidrug regimens. Inter-patient variability of drug response can occur due to change in genetic profiles, intake of food, herbal supplement, and recreational drugs. In this review, we have outlined several clinically important CYP and MDR-mediated drug-drug interactions of antiretroviral agents, antineoplastic agents, azole antifungals, statins, methadone, antibacterials, cardiovascular medicines, immune modulators, recreational drugs and herbal agents. Mechanisms by which such drug interactions occur have been briefly discussed in some of the examples.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics of commonly used anticancer drugs

The quantitative aspects of drug disposition in man of the commonly used antineoplastic agents, including cyclophosphamide, the nitrosoureas, cisplatin, methotrexate, cytarabine, 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, daunorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, vinblastine, and vindesine are reviewed. Although the pharmacokinetic behaviour of these drugs has been adequately described in man, the chemical reactivity, the complexity of metabolism and disposition, the lack of simple, rapid and sensitive assays to measure plasma concentration, and the lack of defined therapeutic and toxic plasma concentrations have limited the application of routine drug monitoring in clinical oncology. With the exception of high dose methotrexate, drug doses and administration schedules remain empirical with a standard starting dose and subsequent dosage modifications determined by ensuing drug toxicities. However, many of the pharmacological characteristics of the drugs, such as their low therapeutic index, potentially life-threatening toxicities and wide individual variability in drug disposition, necessitate pharmacological monitoring. Comprehensive pharmacokinetic analysis of new and established antineoplastic agents does play a role in defining dosage, administration schedule, route of administration, and dosage modification in the presence of organ dysfunction. Consideration of the kinetics of these drugs in planning treatment regimens could lead to more rational, safer and possibly more efficacious use.     

Advances in methods for therapeutic peptide discovery, design and development

Drug discovery and development are intense, lengthy and interdisciplinary processes. Traditionally, drugs were discovered by synthesizing compounds in time-consuming multi-step experimental investigations followed by in vitro and in vivo biological screening. Promising candidates were then further studied for their pharmacokinetic properties, metabolism and potential toxicity. Today, the process of drug discovery has been revolutionized due to the advances in genomics, proteomics, and bioinformatics. Efficient technologies such as combinatorial chemistry, high throughput screening (HTS), virtual screening, de novo design and structure-based drug design contribute greatly to drug discovery. Peptides are emerging as a novel class of drugs for cancer therapy, and many efforts have been made to develop peptide-based pharmacologically active compounds. This paper presents a review of current advances and novel approaches in experimental and computational drug discovery and design. We also present a novel bioactive peptide analogue, designed using the Resonant Recognition Model (RRM), and discuss its potential use for cancer therapeutics.     

The impact of recent innovations in the use of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in support of drug metabolism studies: are we all the way there yet?

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicology (ADMET) studies are widely used in drug discovery and development to help obtain the optimal balance of properties necessary to convert lead compounds into drugs that are safe and effective for human use. Drug discovery efforts have been aimed at identifying and addressing metabolism issues at the earliest possible stage, by developing and applying innovative liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based techniques and instrumentation, which are both faster and more accurate than prior techniques. Such new approaches are demonstrating considerable potential to improve the overall safety profile of drug candidates throughout the drug discovery and development process. These emerging techniques streamline and accelerate the process by eliminating potentially harmful candidates earlier and improving the safety of new drugs. In the area of drug metabolism, for example, revolutionary changes have been achieved by the combination of LC-MS with innovative instrumentation such as triple quadrupoles, ion traps and time-of-flight mass spectrometry. In turn, most ADMET studies have come to rely on LC-MS for the analysis of an ever-increasing workload of potential candidates. This article provides a discussion on the importance of LC-MS in supporting drug metabolism studies, and highlights the relative merits of current applications for LC-MS in drug metabolism testing and analysis. These applications include in vitro and in vivo testing, pharmacokinetic profiling, chiral separations, stable isotope labeling, metabolic activation testing, metabolite characterization and radiolabeled-drug testing.     

The significance of chirality in drug design and development

Proteins are often enantioselective towards their binding partners. When designing small molecules to interact with these targets, one should consider stereoselectivity. As considerations for exploring structure space evolve, chirality is increasingly important. Binding affinity for a chiral drug can differ for diastereomers and between enantiomers. For the virtual screening and computational design stage of drug development, this problem can be compounded by incomplete stereochemical information in structure libraries leading to a "coin toss" as to whether or not the "ideal" chiral structure is present. Creating every stereoisomer for each chiral compound in a structure library leads to an exponential increase in the number of structures resulting in potentially unmanageable file sizes and screening times. Therefore, only key chiral structures, enantiomeric pairs based on relative stereochemistry need be included, and lead to a compromise between exploration of chemical space and maintaining manageable libraries. In clinical environments, enantiomers of chiral drugs can have reduced, no, or even deleterious effects. This underscores the need to avoid mixtures of compounds and focus on chiral synthesis. Governmental regulations emphasizing the need to monitor chirality in drug development have increased. The United States Food and Drug Administration issued guidelines and policies in 1992 concerning the development of chiral compounds. These guidelines require that absolute stereochemistry be known for compounds with chiral centers and that this information should be established early in drug development in order that the analysis can be considered valid. From exploration of structure space to governmental regulations it is clear that the question of chirality in drug design is of vital importance.     

Building Blocks for the Preparation of Enantiomerically Pure Drugs Containing a Phenylalkylamine Moiety. Synthesebausteine zur Herstellung enantiomerenreiner Arzneistoffe mit Phenylalkylamin-Partialstruktur

The enantiomers of chiral drugs may exhibit distinctly different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Thus, the application of pure enantiomers is desirable in most cases. Therefore, it is necessary to know which enantiomer is the more advantageous one and to work out an economical large scale synthesis of this pure enantiomer. Biocatalytic transformations of prochiral compounds provide an easy and efficient access to chiral, non racemic compounds. Therefore, we fixed upon microbial reductions of carbonyl compounds as the key steps in the preparation of enantiomerically pure building blocks.     

Stereoselectivity in the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the chiral antimalarial drugs

Several of the antimalarial drugs are chiral and administered as the racemate. These drugs include chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, quinacrine, primaquine, mefloquine, halofantrine, lumefantrine and tafenoquine. Quinine and quinidine are also stereoisomers, although they are given separately rather than in combination. From the perspective of antimalarial activity, most of these agents demonstrate little stereoselectivity in their effects in vitro. Mefloquine, on the other hand, displays in vitro stereoselectivity against some strains of P. falciparum, with a eudismic ratio of almost 2 : 1 in favour of the (+)-enantiomer. Additionally, for some of these agents (e.g. halofantrine, primaquine, chloroquine), stereoselectivity has been noted in the ability of the enantiomers to cause certain adverse effects. In recent years, stereospecific analytical methods capable of measuring the individual enantiomers after the administration of racemic drugs have been reported for a number of chiral antimalarial drugs. These assays have revealed that almost all the studied antimalarial drugs display stereoselectivity in their pharmacokinetics, leading to enantioselectivity in their plasma concentrations. Whereas the oral absorption of these agents appears to be non-stereoselective, stereoselectivity is often seen in their volume of distribution and/or clearance. With regard to distribution, plasma protein binding of some chiral antimalarial drugs exhibits a significant degree of stereoselectivity, leading to stereoselective distribution to blood cells and other tissues. Because of their low hepatic extraction ratios, stereoselective plasma protein binding also contributes to the stereoselectivity in the metabolism of these drugs. Chiral metabolites are formed from some parent antimalarial drugs, although stereoselective aspects of the pharmacokinetics of the metabolites are not well understood. It is concluded that knowledge of the stereoselective aspects of these agents may be helpful in better understanding their mechanisms of action and possibly optimising their clinical safety and/or effectiveness.     

Molecular and pharmacokinetic properties of 222 commercially available oral drugs in humans

This study was performed to determine the exclusion criteria that differentiate poorly absorbed drugs from good drug candidates, and to accelerate drug development by exclusion of unnecessary assessment. The molecular and pharmacokinetic properties of 222 commercially available oral drugs were tabulated and their correlations were analyzed. The exclusion criteria obtained were 1) a molecular weight of more than 500, and 2) a ClogP value of more than 5. Exceptions to molecular weight criteria were compounds with a sugar moiety, high atomic weight, and large cyclic structure. It was also suggested that being a substrate for MDRI (P-glycoprotein) does not always result in poor bioavailability, and that drug development by chemical modification of a seed or lead compound with quantitative structure activity relationship analysis can result in lower bioavailability, higher bound fraction and lower urinary excretion, which would hamper later development processes and might result in considerable drug-drug interaction. The criteria should be adjusted according to the pharmacological profiles of the agents in question and depending on the estimated profit, but ignoring these criteria may result in a significant waste of time and money during drug development.     

药动学和药效学评价生物制品:挑战与局限性

近年来,重组蛋白多肽和蛋白质已发展成为主流药物。多肽和蛋白类药物在临床前和临床研究以及治疗用药中均占有相当大的比重。理解药物动力学和药效动力学,包括剂量-浓度-效应之间的关系,对于包括多肽和蛋白类在内的任何药物都是至关重要的,因为它奠定了优化给药方案和临床合理用药的基础。比起传统的基于小分子的疗法,多肽和蛋白类药物的药物暴露/效应评价往往由于下列因素而变得复杂:(1)与内源性多肽、蛋白及营养物质的相似性;(2)能在分子水平直接参与体内生理过程;(3)具有高分子特性及免疫原性;(4)由于存在着很多相似的分子,目标物的分析和量化具有一定的挑战性。不像传统的小分子药物,多肽和蛋白质口服后往往没有治疗活性。为选择最适当的给药途径,需要全面了解多肽和蛋白质理化性质以外的吸收特性,包括化学和代谢稳定性、吸收部位、免疫反应性、跨膜过程以及主动摄取和外排过程。肽和蛋白质的各种分布特性决定了其在靶器官能否达到适宜浓度从而发挥预期疗效,而结合现象和受体介导的细胞摄取有可能使这个问题更加复杂化。消除过程作为药物全身暴露的一个关键因素,可以是众多通路的综合,包括肾脏及肝脏代谢通路以及广义的蛋白水解作用与受体介导的内吞作用。多肽和蛋白质为基础药物的药代动力学/药效学结合研究常因其与内源性物质密切的相互作用以及生理调节反馈机制而错综复杂。本文重点阐述了与大多数生物制品相关的一些主要动力学特性及过程,为具有药效特性的多肽和蛋白质疗法提供范例。理解了生物疗法和传统小分子药物之间药动学与药效学的差异,将有助于从事药物研发的科学家以及医疗保健人员在药物开发和应用药物治疗过程中用最适宜的方法去处理、评价和用药。     

Drug disposition in three dimensions: an update on stereoselectivity in pharmacokinetics

Many marketed drugs are chiral and are administered as the racemate, a 50:50 combination of two enantiomers. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences between enantiomers are well documented. Because of enantioselectivity in pharmacokinetics, results of in vitro pharmacodynamic studies involving enantiomers may differ from those in vivo where pharmacokinetic processes will proceed. With respect to pharmacokinetics, disparate plasma concentration vs time curves of enantiomers may result from the pharmacokinetic processes proceeding at different rates for the two enantiomers. At their foundation, pharmacokinetic processes may be enantioselective at the levels of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. In some circumstances, one enantiomer can be chemically or biochemically inverted to its antipode in a unidirectional or bidirectional manner. Genetic consideration such as polymorphic drug metabolism and gender, and patient factors such as age, disease state and concomitant drug intake can all play a role in determining the relative plasma concentrations of the enantiomers of a racemic drug. The use of a nonstereoselective assay method for a racemic compound can lead to difficulties in interpretation of data from, for example, bioequivalence or dose/concentration vs effect assessments. In this review data from a number of representative studies involving pharmacokinetics of chiral drugs are presented and discussed.     

Antipsychotic drugs. Clinical pharmacokinetics of potential candidates for plasma concentration monitoring

Antipsychotic drugs (neuroleptics) are candidates for plasma concentration monitoring, but not all agents have the same potential in this respect. The present review analyses the available data on the kinetics and metabolism of fluphenazine, perphenazine, thiothixene, flupenthixol, clopenthixol, haloperidol, pimozide, penfluridol, sulpiride and clozapine. Although some of the drugs described in this review have been in use for many years, knowledge of their pharmacokinetics is still only approximate. This is primarily because determination in biological fluids is not always feasible. Accordingly, analytical methods useful for pharmacokinetic studies or plasma concentration monitoring of these antipsychotic drugs are discussed. With the exception of sulpiride, all the neuroleptics reviewed share some basic pharmacokinetic properties: good gastrointestinal absorption but reduced systemic availability because of hepatic first-pass metabolism, high hepatic clearance and a large apparent volume of distribution leading to an apparent elimination half-life of about 24 hours for most of these compounds. The renal elimination is negligible and it seems that these drugs do not possess active metabolites. The pharmacokinetic properties of antipsychotic drugs are important for the inclusion of a set of drugs in a psychiatric institution where there is a possibility of drug concentration monitoring. In addition, the availability of a depot preparation is of importance. These factors are discussed in view of the experience made during the last years in the University Psychiatric Institutions of Geneva.     

Stereoselectivity in Pharmacokinetics: A General Theory

Stereoselectivity in pharmacokinetics may be characterized by a measurable difference between enantiomers in a pharmacokinetic parameter. We propose that pharmacokinetic parameters may be classified according to three levels of organization in the body and that the hybrid character of parameters increases with the level of organization that they represent. At the molecular level are intrinsic metabolite formation clearances and fraction of drug unbound in plasma, reflecting the selectivity of an endogenous macromolecule for the enantiomers of a chiral drug molecule. At the organ level, pharmacokinetic parameters represent the combined effects of stereoselectivity in each of their component parameters within an organ. As a result, these parameters are of intermediate hybrid character. Parameters with the highest degree of hybrid character describe the pharmacokinetic behavior of a drug in the whole body. The stereoselectivity associated with each of the component parameters could either amplify or dampen the resultant stereoselectivity in hybrid parameters. The hypothesis that kinetic differences between enantiomers are inversely correlated with the degree of hybrid character was examined for four drugs: warfarin, verapamil, mephenytoin, and propranolol. By classifying pharmacokinetic parameters according to both the level of organization that they characterize and their hybrid nature, it becomes possible to account for stereoselectivity in drug distribution and elimination.     

Chiral drugs: an industrial analytical perspective

In the pharmaceutical industry, chiral drug candidates introduce a unique set of challenges to all disciplines involved in the drug development process. For the analytical chemist in particular, the generation of relevant information about a variety of stereoisomeric issues is necessary. Chiral drug candidates, whether a single isomer or a mixture of isomers, require more analytical information than achiral drug candidates. This information can be derived from enantioselective spectroscopic and chromatographic techniques. Chiral analytical methods require proper development and validation to ensure accurate results. Issues related to method development and validation for complete stereochemical characterization are discussed, with primary emphasis on the generation of analytical data required for the registration of a chiral drug candidate. The presentation of pertinent analytical data depends on an awareness of the problems encountered during the development process and the appropriate use of methodology for the determination of stereoisomeric purity.     

Chiral inversion of drugs: coincidence or principle?

2-arylpropionic acid derivatives are probably the most frequently cited drugs exhibiting the phenomenon that is best known as chiral inversion. One enantiomer of drug is converted into its antipode either in the presence of a solvent or more often in inner environment of an organism. Mechanistic studies of the metabolic chiral inversion were carried out for several drugs from NSAIDs, and a model of this inversion was suggested and subsequently confirmed. The chiral inversion of NSAIDs has been intensively studied in the context of the pharmacological and toxicological consequences. However, the group of NSAIDs is not the sole group of drugs in which the inversion phenomenon can be observed. There exist several other drugs that also display chiral inversion of one or even both of their enantiomers. These drugs belong to different pharmacotherapeutic groups as monoamine oxidase inhibitors, antiepileptic drugs, drugs used in the treatment of hyperlipoproteinemia or drugs that are effective in the treatment of leprosy. Moreover, some chiral or prochiral drugs are metabolized to give chiral metabolites that undergo chiral inversion too, which can have direct impact on pharmacological properties or toxicity of the drug. As the process of chiral inversion is affected by several factors, so the intensity of chiral inversion of individual substances and at different conditions can differ considerably. Interspecies differences and types of tissue are reported to be the main factors that were recognized to play the key role in the process of chiral inversion. Some of more recent studies have revealed that several other factors, such as the route of administration or interaction with other xenobiotics, can influence the enantiomeric conversion, too. Chiral inversion does not seem to be a phenomenon connected with only several drugs from some unique group of 2-arylpropionic acid derivatives: it is also observed in drugs with rather different chemical structures and is much more frequent than it can be realized.