Cost of endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is a new minimally invasive method of aneurysm exclusion that has been adopted with increasing enthusiasm, and with acceptable clinical results. It is important, however, to assess new health-care technologies in terms of their economic as well as their clinical impact. The aim of the present study was to compare the total treatment costs for endovascular (EVR) and open surgical repair (OSR) for AAA. METHODS: A retrospective review of patient hospital and outpatient records for 62 patients undergoing either EVR (n = 31) or OSR (n = 31) was carried out between June 1996 and October 1999. Resource utilization was determined by a combination of patient clinical and financial accounting data. Costs were determined for preoperative assessment, inpatient hospital stay, cost of readmissions and follow up, and predicted lifetime follow-up costs. RESULTS: The two groups were well matched, with no significant difference with respect to age, gender, maximum aneurysm diameter or comorbid factors. Endovascular treatment resulted in a shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay (mean: 0.07 vs 2.9 days, P < 0.001; mean: 6.0 vs 13.4 days, P < 0.001; respectively) and fewer postoperative complications (P = 0.003). The cost of hospitalization was less for EVR ($7614 vs $15092, P < 0.001), but this was offset by the more costly vascular prosthesis ($10284 vs $686). Costs were higher for the EVR group for preoperative assessment ($2328 vs $1540, P < 0.001) and follow up ($1284 vs $70, P < 0.001). Lifelong follow up could be expected to cost an additional $4120 per patient after EVR. Total lifetime treatment costs including costs associated with readmission for procedure-related complications were higher for EVR ($26909 vs $17650). CONCLUSION: Treatment costs for endovascular repair are higher than conventional surgical repair due to the cost of the vascular prosthesis and the greater requirement for radiological imaging studies.     

Elective endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an increasingly popular treatment option for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), although open repair is considered the standard by virtue of its durability. Octogenarians, as a subgroup, may stand to benefit the most by EVAR. The purpose of this study is to review operative results and durability of open AAA repair and EVAR in octogenarians. METHODS: From May 1996 to August 2006, 150 patients aged >or=80 years underwent elective repair of their infrarenal AAA. Eighty-one underwent EVAR and 69 had open repair. Demographic data, aneurysm specifics, comorbidities, operative morbidity and mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and late outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: In the EVAR group, 27 of 81 (33%) patients died during a mean follow-up of 25 months. In the open repair group, 34 of 69 (49%) patients died during a mean follow-up of 43 months. The median survival time for EVAR was 350 weeks (range, 145-404 weeks) compared with 317 weeks (range, 233-342 weeks) for the open repair group. A Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis showed no difference in early or long-term survival between EVAR and open repair (P = .13). EVAR was associated with decreased blood loss, decreased length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, and a greater number of patients discharged to home. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR and open repair are comparable in safety and efficacy in octogenarians. Operative repair outcomes remain acceptable. Mid- and long-term survival are similar, indicating no survival advantage of one procedure compared with the other.     

Predictors of survival following open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Clinical decision making for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) weighs risk of aneurysm rupture, treatment hazards, and overall survival expectations. AAA diameter is the primary parameter in assessing rupture risk. Perioperative risk assessment has been extensively studied, and in-hospital mortality has been reduced to less than 8% with higher-risk open repair and less than 3% with endovascular repair. The purpose of this report is to determine risk factors that predict 2-year survival following open and endovascular AAA repair. We studied 334 patients enrolled in a multicenter clinical trial evaluating an endovascular graft in comparison to standard open repair of infrarenal AAA. Demographic, medical history, physical examination, laboratory, anatomic, procedural, and standardized risk score system variables were analyzed in a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Overall survival was 89% at 2 years. Heart disease, cancer, and stroke were the most common causes of death, and no deaths were due to AAA rupture. Cox modeling demonstrated that there were several independent predictors for death after AAA repair: smaller body mass index (p=0.005), Society for Vascular Surgery pulmonary risk score >or=1 (p=0.005), history of erectile dysfunction (p=0.008), history of heart valve replacement (p=0.008), lower preoperative platelet count (p=0.012), larger ratio of AAA diameter/proximal neck diameter (p=0.020), and lower ankle-brachial index (p=0.031). Age, gender, and open or endovascular treatment group are not significant independent risk factors for 2-year mortality in this study. Clinical, laboratory, and anatomic factors predict survival after open and endovascular repair of AAAs. With progressive reduction of in-hospital mortality, assessment of patient longevity after AAA repair has become a more important factor in clinical decision making. Use of valid predictors of patient survival will optimize resource utilization and improve overall patient outcomes. Better selection of patients for any method of repair may improve overall utility more than choice of open or endovascular techniques.     

Population-based long-term outcomes of open versus endovascular aortic repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

ObjectiveExisting data regarding endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) are conflicting in their findings. The purpose of this paper was to determine the long-term outcomes of EVAR vs open surgical repair (OSR) for treatment of rAAA.MethodsA population-based retrospective cohort study of all patients 40 years or more that underwent OSR or EVAR of rAAA in Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2016 was conducted. Administrative data from the province of Ontario was used as the data source. The propensity for repair approach was calculated using a logistic regression model including all covariates and used for inverse probability of treatment weighting. Cox proportional hazards regression was conducted using the weighted cohort to determine the survival and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)-free survival of EVAR relative to OSR for rAAA up to 10 years after repair.ResultsA total of 2692 rAAA (261 EVAR [10%] and 2431 OSR [90%]) repairs were recorded from April 1, 2003, to March 31, 2016. Mean follow-up for the entire cohort was 3.4 years (standard deviation [SD], 3.9 years), with a maximum follow-up of 14.0 years. OSR patients were followed for a mean of 3.5 years (SD, 4.0 years) and maximum of 14.0 years, and EVAR patients were followed for a mean of 2.7 years (SD, 2.7 years) and a maximum of 11.4 years. Median survival was 2.7 years overall, and 2.5 and 3.7 years for OSR and EVAR patients, respectively. There were no significant baseline differences between EVAR and OSR patients after inverse probability of treatment weighting. EVAR patients were at lower hazard for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.65; P < .01), and MACE (hazard ratio, 0.51, 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.66; P < .01) within 30 days of repair. There were no statistically significant differences between EVAR and OSR in the hazard for all-cause mortality or MACE from 30 days to 5 years, and 5 to 10 years. Despite this, the upfront mortality and MACE benefits of EVAR persisted for more than 4.5 years after repair.ConclusionsThis population-based cohort study using administrative data from Ontario, Canada, demonstrated lower hazards for all-cause mortality and MACE within 30 days of operation in favor of EVAR, but no differences in the mid- or longer-term results. More work is needed to understand and improve the long-term outcomes of ruptured endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and ruptured open surgical repair.     

Predictors of renal dysfunction after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Objective

Renal complications after repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, limited data have assessed risk factors for renal complications in the endovascular era. This study aimed to identify predictors of renal complications after endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) and open repair.

Sexual dysfunction in men after open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Few studies have thoroughly investigated the incidence and detailed the degree of sexual disability after aortic aneurysm surgery. Reports prior to 1990 vary greatly in the incidence of postoperative dysfunction mostly because of nonstandardized methods of assessment. In this article, we compare the incidence of reported sexual dysfunction after aortic reconstruction, open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Pertinent studies on sexual dysfunction following open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair were identified from a MEDLINE search of English-language publications since 1966. Newer standardized methods of assessment have identified relatively high rates of sexual dysfunction prior to and after intervention. Aortic aneurysm patients have a baseline incidence of sexual dysfunction of approximately 30%, which doubles over the next 7 years. Patients who had open aortic operations reported significantly increased sexual dysfunction during the first postoperative year. Endovascular repair with unilateral internal iliac occlusion results in new sexual dysfunction in approximately 10% of patients, but this increases significantly with bilateral internal iliac occlusion. When compared with open operation, the incidence of sexual dysfunction is lower overall in patients with endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs, which includes those who have internal iliac artery occlusion, but it is increased with bilateral iliac occlusion. Surgeons should be aware of the preoperative prevalence of sexual dysfunction in patients undergoing aortic procedures.     

Current outcomes in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

The repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms has presently been reported to be accomplished using endovascular techniques in 60% of the cases. As technology continues to improve on the design of endovascular devices, this will only result in a progressive upward trend of this innovative method. At this time, there are multiple commercial and investigational devices available. We elect to discuss current results pertaining to the optimal candidate, characteristics, complications, and the long-term durability of aortic stent-grafts.     

Anemia and postoperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms

Objective

Anemia is associated with increased cardiac adverse events during the early postoperative period because of high physiologic stress and increased cardiac demand. The aim of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes and prognostic implications of anemia in patients undergoing repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

Embolic complications after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Purpose

This retrospective study aimed to review our experiences with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), along with the incidence, risk factors and prognoses of associated embolic events. Our goal was to present the EVAR results and related risk factors from a single center, with a focus on embolic complications.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 539 patients with AAAs who underwent elective EVAR at Jikei University from July 2006 to April 2009. Of these, 438 patients were selected after excluding those requiring fenestrated and branched EVAR.

Results

The technical success rate was 91.1 % (399/438) with no surgical mortality. Embolic complications occurred in nine patients (2 %), four of whom developed ischemic colitis and were successfully treated with bowel rest and hydration. Lower extremity atheroembolization and stroke occurred in three and one patients, respectively. Two patients died of cholesterol crystal embolization. Seven of the nine embolic complications (77.8 %) were associated with the use of Zenith stent-grafts. A Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis of the adjusted risk factors showed that smoking and severe arterial degeneration of the aorta, referred to as a shaggy aorta, to be independent predictors of embolic complications.

Conclusions

The presence of a shaggy aorta and a history of smoking are independent predictors of embolic complications associated with EVAR.     

Differences in renal response between endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: to determine the difference in renal and systemic response between open and endovascular aneurysm repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: we studied prospectively 22 patients undergoing open repair (OR) and 15 patients undergoing endovascular repair (ER). Blood and urine samples were taken preoperatively (T0) and before clamping of the aorta or femoral artery (T1) and 5 min (T2), 1 h (T3), 6 h (T4), 24 h (Day 1) and 48 h (Day 2) after declamping. Albumin/creatinin ratio (AC ratio) in urine, serum albumin, serum creatinin, serum C-reactive protein and serum lactate were determined. RESULTS: the urinary AC ratio in ER was significantly lower than in OR (p<0.001). In both groups the rise in urine albumin/creatinin ratio after declamping (T2, T3) was significant (p<0.001). C-reactive protein was raised significantly at day 1 and 2 in both groups (p<0.001) with no difference between the groups. Serum lactate values were significantly higher in OR. There was a significant increase in serum lactate 6 h after declamping in the ER group. CONCLUSIONS: after endovascular repair renal damage is less compared to open repair. There is a significant systemic reaction to the endovascular repair causing mild, short-lasting damage to the kidney. This systemic response is most probably induced by a combination of ischaemia reperfusion injury and the surgical trauma of the procedure. Other possible explanations are discussed.     

Predictors for outcome after open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present study were to analyze patient- and management-related predictors for outcome after open (OR) and endovascular repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). DESIGN: Retrospective study. MATERIALS: The in-hospital registry of Malm? University Hospital identified 162 patients operated on due to rAAA between 2000 and 2004. METHODS: Patient- and management-related predictors for outcome were analysed. RESULTS: Preoperative CT in 39 out of 62 circulatory unstable patients was not associated with increased mortality (p=0.60). There was a significant increase in repairs performed by EVAR during the study period (p<0.001), and in 2004 EVAR exceeded the annual rate of OR. Patients in the EVAR group were older (p=0.025), whereas patients in the OR group more often suffered from unconsciousness after presentation (p=0.004). Age, unconsciousness after presentation and haemoglobin were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality when tested in a multivariate logistic regression model (p=0.002, p=0.003 and p<0.001, respectively). The in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing OR and EVAR was 45% (48/106) and 34% (19/56), respectively (p=0.16). Diagnosis of abdominal compartment syndrome (p=0.005) and intestinal infarction (p=0.002) was associated with poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-related factors such as age, loss of consciousness and haemoglobin predicts outcome in a population where both emergency OR and EVAR for the treatment of rAAA is feasible.     

Real-world cost analysis of endovascular repair versus open repair in patients with nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to provide a nationwide, all-payer, real-world cost analysis of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open aortic aneurysm repair (OAR) in patients with nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (non-rAAA).MethodsAll non-rAAA patients registered between July 2009 and March 2015 in the Premier Healthcare Database were analyzed. The Student t-test and the χ² test were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively; median value comparisons were done with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank-sum test. The in-hospital absolute mean total cost (sum of fixed cost and variable cost) and subcategories were analyzed after adjustment for inflation at July 2015. Fixed costs included all overhead costs while variables costs included in-hospital services including procedures, room and board, services provided by hospital staff, and pharmacy costs. Total cost was stratified based on admission type (emergency vs nonemergency), 75th percentile of length of hospital stay among individual procedures (expected vs extended stay), mortality, and complications. Student t-test and Fisher's analysis of variance were used for comparing mean cost. Year-wise comparison of mean cost was done with analysis of variance to look for a trend over time.ResultsOur study cohort included 38,809 non-rAAA patients (33,171 EVAR and 5638 OAR). The mean total cost of index admission was lower in EVAR in comparison with OAR ($32,052 vs $36,091; P < .001), with lower fixed costs ($11,309 vs $16,818; P < .001) and higher variable costs ($20,743 vs $19,272; P < .001). Cost of pharmacy, labor, operating room, room and board and other costs were significantly higher with OAR, whereas the supply cost was higher with EVAR. The expected hospital length of stay of patients who underwent EVAR was associated with a higher total cost ($27,271 vs $25,680; P < .001) and a higher variable cost ($18,186 vs $13,671; P < .001) than OAR patients. However, the extended hospital stay of patients who underwent EVAR had lower costs in all categories compared with the extended length of stay of those who underwent OAR. Mortality associated with EVAR was costlier than OAR associated mortality (mean $72,483 vs $59,804; P = .017). From 2009 to 2014, the mean total cost of EVAR increased significantly by 18.5% ($28,745 vs $34,049; P < .001) owing to a 7.8% increase in fixed costs ($10,931 vs $11,789; P < .001) and a 25.0% increase in variable costs ($17,804 vs $22,257; P < .001). The mean total cost OAR remained stable over time.ConclusionsOverall hospitalization costs associated with EVAR of non-rAAA was lower than the hospitalization cost of OAR. Interestingly, we found that, among patients who had an expected hospital length of stay, the hospitalization cost after OAR was significantly lower than after EVAR. The average hospitalization cost of OAR was stable during the 5 years study period, whereas the hospitalization cost of EVAR increased significantly over time. Further studies are required to identify reasons for increased costs associated with EVAR.     

Contemporary open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Objective

Although endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) is increasingly more prevalent and may yield better results, open repair of rAAAs is still commonly performed. Our goal was to assess the contemporary practice patterns and outcomes of open repair of rAAA.