Relationship between joint national committee-VI classification of hypertension and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension diagnosed by casual blood pressure

Background: White-coat hypertension has been diagnosed arbitrarily based on different criteria. In 1997, the Joint National Committee-VI (JNC-VI) reported a new classification of hypertension and strongly emphasized the importance of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring. The report pronounced normal ABP values for the first time. Hypothesis: The study's aim was to clarify the relationship between casual blood pressure (BP) and ABP of patients with essential hypertension in each stage of JNC-VI classification, and the prevalence of white-coat hypertension diagnosed by using JNC-VI normal ABP criteria. Methods: Ambulatory blood pressure was monitored noninvasively in 232 patients with essential hypertension whose casual BP was ≥ 140/90 mmHg. The patients were classified according to JNC-VI classification, and their casual BP was compared with ABP. The criterion of white-coat hypertension was defined as casual BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg with normal ABP according to JNC-VI criteria (< 135/85 during daytime and < 120/75 during nighttime). Results: Mean ABP increased as the stage advanced, and the differences between casual BP and ABP also increased. There were considerable overlaps in the distribution of ABP among stages. The prevalence of white-coat hypertension was 13% overall: 30% of the patients with isolated systolic hypertension, 19% of those in stage 1,10% in stage 2, and 4% in stage 3. Conclusions: Classification of hypertension based on casual BP may not always correspond in severity to that based on ABP. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recommended by JNC-VI is very useful for the evaluation of hypertension to differentiate white-coat hypertension from true hypertension.     

Identification of subjects with white-coat hypertension and persistently normal ambulatory blood pressure

OBJECTIVE: To assess the spontaneous changes in clinic blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and left ventricular structure in untreated subjects with white-coat hypertension (WCH). DESIGN: A prospective observational study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 83 untreated subjects with WCH, 24 h non-invasive ABP monitoring and echocardiographic studies of the left ventricle were repeated after 0.5-6.5 years (mean 2.5) in the absence of antihypertensive drug treatment. WCH was defined by an average daytime ABP < 131/86 mmHg in women and < 136/87 mmHg in men. Ambulatory hypertension was defined by higher ABP values. RESULTS: In the whole population, the clinic blood pressure, ABP and left ventricular mass did not change from baseline to the follow-up visit, whereas the peak A: peak E ratio (where A is the velocity of transmitral blood flow after atrial contraction and E is the velocity during passive left ventricle filling) increased from 0.86 to 0.93. Sixty-three per cent of subjects remained in the WCH category at follow-up study; the remaining 37% shifted to the ambulatory hypertension category. The former group showed no changes in clinic blood pressure, ABP, left ventricular mass and peak A: peak E ratio. The clinic blood pressure of those who developed ambulatory hypertension did not change, whereas their ABP and peak A: peak E ratio increased and their left ventricular mass increased slightly but not significantly. The left ventricular mass increased from baseline to follow-up study by 6.2% in those who developed ambulatory hypertension and decreased by 1.6% in those who remained in the WCH category. The changes in left ventricular mass were associated with the changes in average 24 h systolic blood pressure, but not with the changes in clinic blood pressure. In a stepwise logistic regression analysis, average daytime diastolic blood pressure was the sole variable to enter the model and the probability of ambulatory hypertension at follow-up study was 20.0%percnt; in those with basal daytime ABP <130/80 mmHg, versus 81% in those with higher basal daytime blood pressure levels. CONCLUSION: After 0.5-6.5 years, WCH spontaneously evolved into ambulatory hypertension in 37% of subjects, with an accompanying rise in left ventricular mass. The probability of ambulatory hypertension increased with the baseline values of ABP, rather than with those of clinic blood pressure. WCH might be a prehypertensive state (particularly in subjects with higher baseline ABP levels) and should be defined by low levels of daytime ABP, possibly lower than 130/80 mmHg.     

Characteristics of white coat hypertension in Chinese Han patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objectives: This study documented the prevalence and clinical features of white coat hypertension (WCH) among Chinese Han patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T₂DM). Methods: Clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements were compared in 856 patients with T₂DM to determine the frequency of WCH (WCH was defined as clinical blood pressure ≥140/90?mmHg and daytime blood pressure <135/85?mmHg and/or 24-h ambulatory BP (ABP) mean value of <130/80?mmHg on ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Weight, waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), waist to height ratio (WHtR), fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin level and circadian BP patterns were also measured to find clinical features predictive of WCH in T₂DM. Results: The prevalence of WCH was 7.36% (63/856) in the overall population, 6.13% (29/473) in male and 8.88% (34/383) in female (p?2DM, male WC were independent protective factors, whereas female sex, smoking and alcohol consumption were independent risk factors for WCH in T₂DM. Non-dippers and reverse dippers made up larger proportion of the WCH group (p?Conclusion: WCH is relatively common among T₂DM patients, it is a unique condition distinct from essential hypertension (EH), and WCH patients also exhibit significant differences in clinical parameters.     

The clinical significance of white-coat and masked hypertension

OBJECTIVE: Self-measured blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring are used to define the arbitrary clinical categories of masked hypertension (MH) and white-coat hypertension (WCH). Severity of target organ damage and incidence of major cardiovascular events are greater in patients with MH than in patients whose BP is normal both inside and outside the doctor's office. METHODS: We reviewed studies that addressed the prognostic impact of MH and WCH. RESULTS: Overall, WCH was associated with a better outcome and MH to a poor outcome. We, however, need the criteria to identify the clinically normotensive patients at elevated pretest probability of MH in whom a broad use of self-measured home BP and 24-hour ambulatory BP as screening tests may be appropriate and cost effective. Clinical management of patients with MH should continue to be based on current guidelines and mostly related to target organ damage and associated clinical conditions because of the normal values of clinic BP in these patients. WCH is generally defined by the coexistence of persistently high office BP with normal daytime or 24-hour ABP. Daytime ABP normalcy has been defined by values<135/85 mmHg. Data, however, suggest that incidence of cardiovascular events tends to increase consistently above the cut-off value of 130/80 mmHg for daytime BP. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcome of patients with WCH remains uncertain. Data suggesting an increased risk of stroke need to be confirmed in wide-scale studies.     

The importance of using 24‐hour and nighttime blood pressure for the identification of white coat hypertension: Data from the Jackson Heart Study

We calculated the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) using out‐of‐clinic blood pressure (BP) in the daytime period; daytime and 24‐hour periods; and daytime, 24‐hour, and nighttime periods among 199 African Americans with clinic‐measured systolic/diastolic BP ≥140/90 mm Hg in the Jackson Heart Study. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was measured among participants with WCH and 374 participants with sustained normotension (ie, non‐hypertensive clinic, daytime, 24‐hour, and nighttime BP). The prevalence of WCH was 29.6%, 21.1%, and 10.6% using daytime BP; daytime and 24‐hour BP; and daytime, 24‐hour, and nighttime BP, respectively. Compared with sustained normotension, LVMI was higher when WCH was defined using daytime BP (adjusted mean difference [95% CI] 5.0 [?0.2, 10.1] g/m²), but not when defined using daytime and 24‐hour BP or daytime, 24‐hour, and nighttime BP (adjusted mean difference [95% CI] 3.9 [?1.9, 9.7] and 0.4 [?7.3,8.2] g/m², respectively). Using only daytime BP overestimates the prevalence of WCH among African Americans.     

Clinical Implications of White Coat Hypertension

Objective: To determine the clinical implications of mild white coat hypertension (WCH).

Subjects and methods: We studied 102 subjects (54 men, 48 women). 51 of whom were normotensive and 51 slightly hypertensive. None had ever received antihypertensive therapy. An ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) record (Accutracker II), a 24-h electrocardiogram and an echocardiogram were obtained from each, and each was examined by funduscopy. WCH subjects were compared with sustained hypertension (SH) subjects and with normotensives.

Results: Fifty-three percent of the hypertensives qualified as WCH. The ultrasonographic characteristics and the ABP variables of the WCH group differed significantly from those of normotensives, but not from those of the SH group. The prevalence of left ventricilar hypertrophy (LVH) in the SH group (62.5%) did not differ significantly from its prevalence in the WCH group (40.7%). but the prevalence among normotensives (17.6%) was significantly lower than in either of the other two groups. The WCH and SH groups did not differ significantly as regards the prevalence of hypertensive retinopathy (33.3%) in the former, 58.3% in the latter). For no non-LVH, nonretinopathic subject, whether norniotensive or hypertensive, were more than 18% of daytime diastolic ABP measurements ≥90mmHg. Ultrasonographic findings were no better correlated with ABP than with in-clinic BP measurements. Fundus findings correlated well with in-clinic BP and with numerous ABP parameters. Retinopathy, with or without LVH, was efficiently predictable among hypertensives on the basis of body mass index and the 24-h maximum of systolic BP.

Conclusions: Myocardiac remodelling and vascular retinopathy develop early and in parallel in hypertensives, and both developments appear to involve determinants including body mass index and 24-h maximum systolic BP. WCH subjects, as defined by current ABP-based criteria, have cardiac and retinovascular Characteristics different to normotensive subjects. Stricter criteria are needed to discriminate between hypertensives with and without the systemic developments that constitute the immediate source of risk to the hypertensive individual.     

Target organ damage in "white coat hypertension" and "masked hypertension"

BACKGROUND: In this study we investigated (i) the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH) in patients who had never been treated earlier with antihypertensive medication, and (ii) the association of these conditions with target organ damage. METHODS: A total of 1,535 consecutive patients underwent office blood pressure (BP) measurements, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), echocardiography, and ultrasonography of the carotid arteries. Subjects who showed normotension or hypertension on the basis of both office and ambulatory BP (ABP) measurement were characterized as having confirmed normotension or confirmed hypertension, respectively. WCH was defined as office hypertension with ambulatory normotension, and MH as office normotension with ambulatory hypertension. RESULTS: WCH was found in 17.9% and MH in 14.5% of the subjects. The prevalence of WCH was significantly higher in subjects with obesity, while the prevalence of MH was significantly higher in normal-weight subjects. The confirmed hypertensive subjects as well as the masked hypertensive subjects had significantly higher left ventricular mass (LVM) (corrected for body surface area) and carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) than the confirmed normotensive subjects did (108.9 +/- 30.6, 107.1 +/- 29.1 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2) and 0.68 +/- 0.16, 0.68 +/- 0.21 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm, respectively, P < 0.005). White coat hypertensive subjects did not have a significantly higher LVM index than confirmed normotensive subjects (101.5 +/- 25.9 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2)); they tended to have higher cIMT than the confirmed normotensive subjects, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.67 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm). CONCLUSIONS: WCH and MH are common conditions in patients who visit hypertension outpatient clinics. Confirmed hypertension and MH are accompanied by increased LVM index and cIMT, even after adjusting for other risk factors.     

Diagnosis of hypertension: Ambulatory pediatric American Heart Association/European Society of Hypertension versus blood pressure load thresholds

The agreement between the traditionally‐used ambulatory blood pressure (ABP)‐load thresholds in children and recently‐recommended pediatric American Heart Association (AHA)/European Society of Hypertension (ESH) ABP thresholds for diagnosing ambulatory hypertension (AH), white coat hypertension (WCH), and masked hypertension (MH) has not been evaluated. In this cross‐sectional study on 450 outpatient participants, the authors evaluated the agreement between previously used ABP‐load 25%, 30%, 40%, 50% thresholds and the AHA/ESH thresholds for diagnosing AH, WCH, and MH. The American Academy of Pediatrics thresholds were used to diagnose office hypertension. The AHA threshold diagnosed ambulatory normotension/hypertension closest to ABP load 50% in 88% (95% CI 0.79, 0.96) participants (k 0.67, 95% CI 0.59, 0.75) and the ESH threshold diagnosed ambulatory normotension/hypertension closest to ABP load 40% in 86% (95% CI 0.77, 0.94) participants (k 0.66, 95% CI 0.59, 0.74). In contrast, the AHA/ESH thresholds had a relatively weaker agreement with ABP load 25%/30%. Therefore, the diagnosis of AH was closest between the AHA threshold and ABP load 50% (difference 3%, 95% CI ‐2.6%, 8.6%, p = .29) and between the ESH threshold and ABP load 40% (difference 4%, 95% CI ‐2.1%, 10.1%, p = .19) than between the AHA/ESH and ABP load 25%/30% thresholds. A similar agreement pattern persisted between the AHA/ESH and various ABP load thresholds for diagnosing WCH and MH. The AHA and ESH thresholds diagnosed AH, WCH, and MH closest to ABP load 40%/50% than ABP load 25%/30%. Future outcome‐based studies are needed to guide the optimal use of these ABP thresholds in clinical practice.     

White coat hypertension in children: not rare and not benign?

The clinical significance of white coat hypertension (WCH) remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the target organ damage (TOD) in children with essential hypertension (HTN) and WCH. We retrospectively analyzed the body mass index (BMI) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in 183 untreated children aged 5 to 19 years who were referred for assessment of hypertension and had secondary hypertension ruled out. Left ventricular mass index (LVMi) and carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) were analyzed in a subset of 106 children. WCH was found in 54/183 children (29.5%) who had normal mean arterial pressure (MAP), MAP load, and MAP day/night ratio. However, the mean ± SD LVMi (g/m^2.7) was identical in HTN and WCH patients (38.2 ± 10.9 vs. 37.0 ± 11.3, P = .59); it exceeded the 95th percentile in 40% HTN and 36% WCH patients (NS). The mean CIMT was significantly higher compared with normal, but not different between HTN and WCH; it exceeded the 95th percentile in 26% HTN and 29% WCH patients. WCH was found in up to 30% of children referred for HTN. Patients with WCH have TOD comparable to that found in HTN patients despite similar BMI, significantly lower average BP and BP load and a well-preserved BP dipping pattern.     

Treated hypertension and the white coat phenomenon: Office readings are inadequate measures of efficacy

To better define the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and to estimate the magnitude of white coat effect (WCE), before and after antihypertensive therapy, we gathered data from an open-label forced-titration study of a combination of antihypertensive drugs that was titrated sequentially, in the order amlodipine, olmesartan, and hydrochlorothiazide, over an 18-week period among 187 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. WCH was defined as daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP) of 135/85 mm Hg or less, but clinic BP of 140/90 mm Hg or more. WCE was obtained as the mean difference between clinic and daytime ambulatory BP. At baseline, the prevalence of WCH was 12%; all but one subject had WCE of >10/5 mm Hg. After treatment, the prevalence of WCH had increased to 39% (P < .001). In the overall population, at baseline, the mean (±SD) WCE for systolic BP was 10.4 ± 10.9 mm Hg and 3.7 ± 8.6 mm Hg for diastolic BP. After treatment, the reduction in systolic WCE was 3.01 ± 0.93 (SE; P < .0001); no reduction was seen for diastolic WCE. Among patients treated with amlodipine-olmesartan combination, WCE at baseline was 11 mm Hg systolic and was attenuated to -0.9 mm Hg. Among patients treated with amlodipine-olmesartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination, systolic WCE was similar at baseline (10.1 mm Hg) and at end of therapy (8.1 mm Hg). Mean systolic difference between dual and triple therapy of 9.9 mm Hg, SE 2.98 was significant (P < .001). The drop in diastolic WCE from 6.4 with dual therapy to -1.2 with triple therapy was also significant (mean difference 7.6, SE 2.2; P < .001). In conclusion, the prevalence of WCH increases three-fold with treatment as a result of fewer patients having sustained hypertension. Thus, out-of-office BP monitoring especially among treated hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes is necessary to provide better assessment of overall BP and response to treatment.     

Cardiac damage in hypertensive patients with inverse white coat hypertension. Hospitalet study

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and cardiac damage in essential hypertensive patients with inverse white coat hypertension (IWCH). OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of IWCH in untreated grade 1-2 hypertension and to assess possible differences in cardiac damage among patients with IWCH, white coat hypertension (WCH) and the rest of patients with grade 1-2 hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and eleven patients with grade 1-2 hypertension were sequentially included. A good quality 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring was obtained in 204 patients (age: 41 +/- 12 years, 56% males). IWCH was defined as a daytime systolic and/or diastolic BP higher than diagnostic office systolic and/or diastolic BP, respectively. WCH was defined as a daytime BP < 135/85 mmHg. A good quality echocardiogram was obtained in 174 patients. We considered left ventricular hypertrophy a left ventricular mass index (LVMI) > or = 125 g/m2. RESULTS: We found IWCH in 29 subjects (14%), and WCH in 68 (33%). Office BP in patients with IWCH was in an intermediate position between WCH and the rest of grade 1-2 hypertension patients. The IWCH patients showed 24-h, daytime and night-time BP higher than the other groups. Left ventricular mass was significantly greater in patients with IWCH than in the other grade 1-2 hypertension patients after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, smoking and office BP (regression coefficient 28.14, 95%CI: 7.36-48.91). CONCLUSION: IWCH is independently associated with higher values of left ventricular mass in patients with grade 1-2 hypertension.     

Marital cohesion and ambulatory blood pressure in early hypertension

One hundred thirty-four men and seventy-one women, unmedicated mild hypertensives, underwent 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABP) and completed standardized questionnaires measuring marital and job stress. Of these, 44.8% had daytime diastolic BP < 90 mm Hg; 96.1% had left ventricular mass index in the normal range (N = 176). Lower marital cohesion (Cohesion, subscale of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale) was related to elevated nighttime ABP (P ≤ .05) and 24-h diastolic BP (P < .05). With low Cohesion (N = 83), more reported spousal contact was associated with elevated nighttime ABP (P < .031). The 7.3% of subjects with very low Cohesion demonstrated approximately 6 mm Hg elevation of all ABP variables, controlling for other significant variables (P < .05, except for nighttime SBP). This study shows an association between marital cohesion and ABP and suggests that marital factors may have a role in sustaining BP in early hypertension.     

Diagnostic criteria of white coat hypertension (WCH): consequences for the implications of WCH for target organs

In a sample comprising 51 normotensive subjects and 51 subjects with in-clinic arterial hypertension [blood pressures (BPs) > or = 140/90 mmHg), we investigated the prevalence of target organ damage [left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and retinal vasculopathy] in white coat hypertension (WCH) groups defined using: (a) the "optimal ambulatory BP" criterion of the Seventh International Consensus Conference (in-clinic BPs >140/90 mmHg, daytime mean BPs < 130/80 mmHg) and (b) the "normal ambulatory BP" criterion proposed in 1997 by Verdecchia and co-workers (in-clinic BPs >140/ 90 mmHg, daytime mean BPs < 135/85 mmHg), and we compared the results with those obtained for the normotensive group and for a WCH group defined as in a 1996 study of the same data. We found that the newer criteria did not alter the conclusions reached in 1996: namely, that WCH constitutes a state of risk intermediate between normotension and sustained hypertension, which demands in-depth evaluation and active monitoring, if not immediate therapy. We also found that when the WCH group was defined as those patients with in-clinic BPs > or = 140/90 mmHg and 24-h mean BPs < 121/78 mmHg, the prevalence of target organ damage was similar to that found in the control group. We conclude that if WCH status is to imply absence of elevated risk of target organ damage, then the ambulatory BP threshold defining WCH should be lower than the upper limit of ambulatory BPs among subjects who are normotensive in the clinic. The desirability of predicting target organ damage in both hypertensive and normotensive subjects using criteria combining in-clinic BPs, daytime mean ambulatory BPs and night-time mean ambulatory BPs is suggested.     

Characteristics of young-onset white coat hypertension identified by targeted screening for hypertension at a university health check-up

Previously we estimated the prevalence of essential hypertension (EH) as around 0.1% and suggested that male gender, obesity, and strong genetic background (hypertension in parents) were risk factors for EH in a young population aged less than 30 based on targeted screening for hypertension at a university health check-up. This study also revealed a high incidence of white coat hypertension (WCH) in university students, and thus, we continued this screening for four consecutive years, and examined the prognosis and clinical characteristics of young-onset WCH. Three occasions of casual blood pressure (BP) measurement and additional home BP measurement revealed 72 WCH and 15 EH students (all males) during the 4-year study period. None of the WCH students had elevated home BP to the level of hypertension during their stay at university, and 26 out of 38 WCH students participating screening in the following years showed normal casual BP. Although WCH students showed a significantly higher pulse rate than controls, WCH could not be fully differentiated from EH either by pulse rate or by correlation between casual BP value and pulse rate. These findings indicate the requirement of longer follow-up after graduation to determine the prognosis of young-onset WCH, though EH and WCH in the young population share the same risk factors and, possibly, autonomic nervous system dysfunction. Since diagnosis of WCH has limited importance for university students, screening of EH following a general health check-up would elevate the clinical validity of casual BP measurement at the university.     

Prognosis of "masked" hypertension and "white-coat" hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the prognosis in subjects with "white-coat" hypertension (WCHT) and "masked" hypertension (MHT), in which blood pressure (BP) is lower in clinical measurements than during ambulatory monitoring. BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of WCHT remains controversial, and little is known about MHT. METHODS: We obtained 24-h ambulatory BP and "casual" BP (i.e., obtained in clinical scenarios) values from 1,332 subjects (872 women, 460 men) > or =40 years old in a representative sample of the general population of a Japanese community. Survival and stroke morbidity were then followed up for a mean duration of 10 years. RESULTS: Composite risk of cardiovascular mortality and stroke morbidity examined using a Cox proportional hazards regression model for subjects with WCHT (casual BP > or =140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg; relative hazards [RH])1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 2.14) was no different from risk for subjects with sustained normal BP (casual BP <140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg). However, risk was significantly higher for subjects with MHT (casual BP <140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP > or =135/85 mm Hg; RH 2.13; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.29) or sustained hypertension (casual BP > or =140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP > or =135/85 mm Hg; RH 2.26; 95% CI 1.49 to 3.41) than for subjects with sustained normal BP. Similar findings were observed for cardiovascular mortality and stroke morbidity among subgroups by gender, use of antihypertensive medication, and risk factor level (all p for heterogeneity >0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional BP measurements may not identify some individuals at high or low risk, but these people may be identifiable by the use of ambulatory BP.     

Association between obesity and the severity of ambulatory hypertension in children and adolescents

The goal of our study was to analyze the association between obesity and the severity of ambulatory hypertension in obese children. A total of 109 patients with primary obesity ages 7 to18 years (mean ± SD age 14.1 ± 3.1) were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups according to body mass index (BMI) Z-scores: group 1 (n = 27): BMI >1.65 and < 3.28 standard deviation scores (SDS); group 2 (n = 55): BMI >3.29 and <4.91 SDS; group 3 (n = 27): BMI >4.92 SDS. Definition and staging of ambulatory hypertension was based on blood pressure (BP) levels and BP load, obtained from ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Only 24% had ambulatory normotension, 25% had ambulatory prehypertension, 3% had hypertension, and 48% had severe ambulatory hypertension. The severity of hypertension increased significantly with the degree of obesity (P = .0027). Daytime systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial BPs increased significantly with increased BMI, whereas the nighttime pressure remained elevated regardless of the degree of obesity. Isolated nighttime hypertension was observed in 25% of patients and 38% were classified as nondippers. Almost 50% of children with obesity and hypertension detected on ABPM suffer from severe ambulatory hypertension. BMI is associated with the severity of ambulatory hypertension and the increase of daytime BP.     

Determinants of white-coat hypertension

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of white-coat hypertension (WCH) is considerable in patients referred with elevated office blood pressure. Failure to recognise this phenomenon can lead to the inappropriate use of antihypertensive medications. We undertook this study to determine the profile of patients with WCH. METHODS: Baseline clinic and daytime ambulatory blood pressures were available from 5716 patients referred over a 22-year period. Individuals were considered to have WCH if they had an elevated clinic blood pressure measurement greater than 140/90 mmHg and normal daytime mean ambulatory blood pressure. Mean age was 53.6 years and 53.2% were female. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of white-coat hypertension was 15.4%. A higher prevalence was seen amongst older adults, females, and non-smokers. CONCLUSION: Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed these characteristics as independent predictors of WCH.     

Blood pressure control in a hypertension hospital clinic.

OBJECTIVES: First, to evaluate the prevalence of clinic blood pressure (BP) control (BP < or = 140/90 mm Hg) in a representative sample of treated hypertensive patients followed in our hypertension clinic. Second, to assess in a subgroup of these patients: (a) the proportion of BP control with both clinic blood pressure (CBP < or =140/90 mm Hg) and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) (< or =132/85 mm Hg) criteria, and (b) the prevalence of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (left ventricular mass index, LVMI>125 g/m2 in men and >110 g/m2 in women). DESIGN AND METHODS: Seven hundred consecutive hypertensive patients who attended our hypertension centre clinic during a period of 6 months and who had regularly been followed up by the same medical team were included in the study. BP was taken in the clinic by a doctor using a mercury sphygmomanometer with the participants seated. Seventy-four patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics to the entire population of participants underwent complete echocardiographic examination and 24 h ABP monitoring. RESULTS: During follow-up, 352 of the treated patients had clinic BP < or =140/90 mm Hg, 198< or =160/95 mm Hg and 150>160/95 mm Hg, indicating that BP control was satisfactory in 50.3%, borderline in 28.3% and unsatisfactory in 21.4% of the cases. In the subgroup of 74 patients, the proportion of individuals with satisfactory clinic BP control (CBP< or =140/90 mm Hg) was higher (50.0 versus 33.6%) than with satisfactory ABP control (daytime ABP values < or =132/85 mm Hg). LVH was found in 21 of the 74 patients (28.3%): 12 of them had unsatisfactory CBP control and 19 had unsatisfactory ABP control. LVMI did not correlate with CBP values but only with ABP values (mean 24 h systolic r = 0.47, diastolic r = 0.40, P<0.001; mean daytime systolic r = 0.45, mean daytime diastolic r = 0.39, P<0.001; mean night-time systolic r = 0.38, mean night-time diastolic r = 0.38, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that hypertensive patients managed in a hypertension centre clinic have satisfactory CBP control in 50% of cases, but this rate seems to over-estimate the effective BP control during daily life. A large fraction of patients show persistence of LVH and this evidence of organ damage almost entirely concerns individuals with poor ABP control.     

Algorithm for diagnosing hypertension using out‐of‐office blood pressure measurements

The authors developed and validated a diagnostic algorithm using the optimal upper and lower cut‐off values of office and home BP at which ambulatory BP measurements need to be applied. Patients presenting with high BP (≥140/90 mm Hg) at the outpatient clinic were referred to measure office, home, and ambulatory BP. Office and home BP were divided into hypertension, intermediate (requiring diagnosis using ambulatory BP), and normotension zones. The upper and lower BP cut‐off levels of intermediate zone were determined corresponding to a level of 95% specificity and 95% sensitivity for detecting daytime ambulatory hypertension by using the receiver operator characteristic curve. A diagnostic algorithm using three methods, OBP‐ABP: office BP measurement and subsequent ambulatory BP measurements if office BP is intermediate zone; OBP‐HBP‐ABP: office BP, subsequent home BP measurement if office BP is within intermediate zone and subsequent ambulatory BP measurement if home BP is within intermediate zone; and HBP‐ABP: home BP measurement and subsequent ambulatory BP measurements if home BP is within intermediate zone, were developed and validated. In the development population (n = 256), the developed algorithm yielded better diagnostic accuracies than 75.8% (95%CI 70.1–80.9) for office BP alone and 76.2% (95%CI 70.5–81.3) for home BP alone as follows: 96.5% (95%CI: 93.4–98.4) for OBP‐ABP, 93.4% (95%CI: 89.6–96.1) for OBP‐HBP‐ABP, and 94.9% (95%CI: 91.5–97.3%) for HBP‐ABP.  In the validation population (n = 399), the developed algorithm showed similarly improved diagnostic accuracy. The developed algorithm applying ambulatory BP measurement to the intermediate zone of office and home BP improves the diagnostic accuracy for hypertension.     

Significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: a meta-analysis using the International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes population

The significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension remains poorly understood. We analyzed subjects from the population-based 11-country International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes database who had daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP; ABP) and conventional BP (CBP) measurements. After excluding persons with diastolic hypertension by CBP (≥90 mm Hg) or by daytime ABP (≥85 mm Hg), a history of cardiovascular disease, and persons <18 years of age, the present analysis totaled 7295 persons, of whom 1593 had isolated systolic hypertension. During a median follow-up of 10.6 years, there was a total of 655 fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. The analyses were stratified by treatment status. In untreated subjects, those with white-coat hypertension (CBP ≥140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) and subjects with normal BP (CBP <140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) were at similar risk (adjusted hazard rate: 1.17 [95% CI: 0.87-1.57]; P=0.29). Furthermore, in treated subjects with isolated systolic hypertension, the cardiovascular risk was similar in elevated conventional and normal daytime systolic BP as compared with those with normal conventional and normal daytime BPs (adjusted hazard rate: 1.10 [95% CI: 0.79-1.53]; P=0.57). However, both treated isolated systolic hypertension subjects with white-coat hypertension (adjusted hazard rate: 2.00; [95% CI: 1.43-2.79]; P<0.0001) and treated subjects with normal BP (adjusted hazard rate: 1.98 [95% CI: 1.49-2.62]; P<0.0001) were at higher risk as compared with untreated normotensive subjects. In conclusion, subjects with sustained hypertension who have their ABP normalized on antihypertensive therapy but with residual white-coat effect by CBP measurement have an entity that we have termed, "treated normalized hypertension." Therefore, one should be cautious in applying the term "white-coat hypertension" to persons receiving antihypertensive treatment.