Pancreatic and salivary amylase/creatinine clearance ratios in normal subjects and in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

The clearance of pancreatic and salivary amylase relative to creatinine was measured in 26 control subjects and 22 patients with chronic pancreatitis. Control values for pancreatic amylase clearance (+/- SD) were 2.64 +/- 0.86% compared with 1.54 +/- 0.95% for salivary amylase. In chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic amylase clearance ratios were significantly higher than controls (P less than 0.0005, mean 4.09 +/- 1.63 SD). The difference in clearance rate of salivary amylase did not reach a level of significance when compared with the control group. Twelve of the 22 patients showed pancreatic amylase clearance values above the normal limit of 4.4, while only five were abnormal when the clearance of total amylase was measured. The patients also showed statistically higher (P less than 0.0005) levels of serum salivary amylase when compared with 69 control sera. No such difference was found for the pancreatic component of serum amylase. Comparison of beta2-microglobulin clearance values showed no statistical difference between patients and controls.     

Relationship between post-ERCP pancreatitis and the change of serum amylase level after the procedure

AIM： To clarify the relationship between the change of serum amylase level and post-ERCP pancreatitis.
METHODS： Between January 1999 and December 2002, 1291 ERCP-related procedures were performed. Serum amylase concentrations were measured before the procedure and 3, 6, and 24 h afterward. The frequency and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis and the relationship between these phenomena and the change in amylase level were estimated.
RESULTS： Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 47 patients （3.6%）. Pancreatitis occurred in 1% of patients with normal amylase levels 3 h after ERCP, and in 1%, 5%, 20%, 31% and 39% of patients with amylase levels elevated 1-2 times, 2-3 times, 3-5 times, 5-10 times and over 10 times the upper normal limit at 3 h after ERCP, respectively （level 〈 2 times vs ≥ 2 times, P 〈 0.001）. Of the 143 patients with levels higher than the normal limit at 3 h after ERCP followed by elevation at 6 h, pancreatitis occurred in 26%. In contrast, pancreatitis occurred in 9% of 45 patients with a level higher than two times the normal limit at 3 h after ERCP followed by a decrease at 6 h （26% vs 9%, P 〈 0.05）.
CONCLUSION： Post-ERCP pancreatitis is frequently associated with an increase in serum amylase level greater than twice the normal limit at 3 h after ERCP with an elevation at 6 h. A decrease in amylase level at 6 h after ERCP suggests the unlikelihood of development of post-ERCP pancreatitis.     

Renal clearance of pancreatic and salivary amylase relative to creatinine in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

Pancreatic and salivary amylase/creatinine clearance ratios in patients with various degrees of renal impairment were compared with those obtained for control subjects. In chronic renal insufficiency (mean GFR 30 ml/min +/- 15 SD; n = 13) the clearance ratios for pancreatic (mean 3.5 +/- 1.85 SD) and salivary (mean 2.3 +/- 1.3 SD) amylase were significantly higher (P less than 0.05) than those in controls. Corresponding control values (n = 26) were 2.64 +/- 0.86 (pancreatic) and 1.64 +/- 0.95 (salivary). Three patients showed values above the normal limit. In the diabetic group (mean GFR 41 ml/min +/- 22 SD; n = 10) salivary amylase/creatinine clearance ratios (mean 2.36 +/- 1.55 SD) were significantly higher than in controls (P less than 0.05). Three patients showed raised values. Pancreatic amylase clearance was raised in only one of these patients. Three patients with terminal disease (mean GFR 10 ml/min) showed markedly raised (two- to threefold) clearance ratios for both salivary and pancreatic amylase. Of a total of 26 patients, eight had increased total amylase/creatinine clearance ratios. Pancreatic amylase/creatinine clearance was increased in seven patients, while nine patients showed raised salivary amylase/creatinine ratios. Patients with raised clearance ratios did not have clinical evidence of pancreatitis. We suggest that, in the presence of impaired renal function, a high amylase/creatinine clearance ratio need not be indicative of pancreatic disease.     

Correlation of serum amylase levels with pancreatic pathology and pancreatitis etiology

Fifty-one patients, 35 men and 16 women, with acute pancreatitis were studied prospectively with early computed tomography (CT). Etiological factors for acute pancreatitis were alcohol abuse (n = 28), gallstones (n = 14), pancreas cancer (n = 3) and miscellaneous (n = 6). Admission serum amylase levels ranged between 68-5,856 U/L with a mean of 1,090 +/- 1,369 U/L. The mean serum amylase level was significantly different between patients with alcoholic pancreatitis (439 +/- 302 U/L) and gallstone pancreatitis (2,480 +/- 1,575) (p less than 0.001). The initial pancreatic CT findings and corresponding mean serum amylase levels were in CT grade A (pancreas normal) 1,499 +/- 1,569 U/L (n = 11), in CT grade B (pancreatic enlargement with inflammation confined to pancreas) 1,144 +/- 1,542 U/L (n = 18), in CT grade C (inflammatory extension into one peripancreatic space) 722 +/- 962 U/L (n = 13) and in CT grade D (inflammatory extension into two or more peripancreatic spaces) 590 +/- 369 U/L (n = 9). However, on separating the etiology subgroups, there was no increase or decrease in the serum amylase level with increasing pancreatic inflammatory involvement. Pancreatic complications (pseudocyst, abscess, necrosis) requiring surgical intervention developed only in patients with CT grades C and D. We conclude that within the etiologic subgroups there is no correlation between the initial serum amylase level and the extent of pancreatic involvement visualized by CT. These findings provide a pathological basis for the clinical observation that the initial serum amylase level cannot predict the outcome in acute pancreatitis.     

Epinephrine irrigation for the prevention of pancreatic damage after endoscopic balloon sphincteroplasty

BACKGROUND: AND AIM: Endoscopic balloon sphincteroplasty (EBS) is an alternative to sphincterotomy for the treatment of bile duct stones. The purpose of this study was to determine if epinephrine irrigation of the papilla can prevent the pancreatic damage associated with EBS. METHODS: A total of 173 patients with bile duct stones were treated by EBS. After conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, EBS was performed by using a biliary dilatation catheter (balloon diameter: 8 mm). The duct was then cleared by using Dormia baskets or retrieval balloon catheters. Mechanical lithotripsy was performed before extraction when the stones were greater than 8 mm in diameter. In 81 patients, the dilated orifice was irrigated with 40-120 mL (50 +/- 37 mL) of 1:1,000,000 epinephrine (epinephrine group). In the remaining 92 patients, epinephrine irrigation was not performed (control group). Acute pancreatitis was defined by a serum amylase concentration fivefold greater than the upper limits of normal in association with abdominal pain. RESULTS: After EBS, serum amylase concentrations were significantly increased in both groups. However, the degree of hyperamylasemia was less in the epinephrine group than in the control group (617 +/- 611 vs 1037 +/- 1491 IU/L, P < 0.05). The incidence of pancreatitis was lower in the epinephrine group than in the control group (1.2 vs 7.6%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Epinephrine irrigation is a simple and useful method to prevent post-EBS pancreatic damage and pancreatitis.     

P amylase is always greater than S in spot urine of normal subjects. Diagnostic implications.

Single random samples of urine were collected from 50 control subjects; 27 patients with chronic pancreatitis; 19 with acute pancreatitis; 6 with acute on chronic pancreatitis; five in the recovery phase of acute attack; four patients with pseudocysts. Salivary (S) and pancreatic (P) amylase values were measured by cellulose acetate electrophoresis. The P amylase values always exceeded those of S amylase in the control specimens. In acute pancreatitis, both the lower and upper levels of total and P amylase were considerably higher than in the controls, and these high values tended to return to normal during the recovery phase of acute pancreatitis. The S amylase values were often very low or undetectable during the acute phase. Values for P amylase exceeded control values in patients with pseudocysts even in the presence of chronic pancreatitis. In chronic calcific pancreatitis, S amylase was higher than P amylase. We conclude that P amylase is always greater than S amylase in normal urine specimens, and a change in this pattern may be helpful in diagnosing various forms of pancreatitis.     

Lipase/amylase ratio. A new index that distinguishes acute episodes of alcoholic from nonalcoholic acute pancreatitis.

Because of observations that patients with acute episodes of alcoholic pancreatitis had high serum lipase levels whereas patients with gall stone pancreatitis had high serum amylase levels, a prospective study was undertaken to determine whether the ratio of serum lipase to serum amylase, a newly computed ratio, would discriminate between acute episodes of alcoholic and nonalcoholic pancreatitis. In phase one, 30 consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis were entered into the study and divided into groups A and B. Patients with renal failure were excluded from the study. Group A consisted of 20 patients in whom the etiology of pancreatitis was alcohol. Group B consisted of 10 patients whose pancreatitis was nonalcoholic in etiology (predominantly gallstones). Serum lipase values in group A ranged 492 to 25,706 U/L (median, 3433 U/L) and in group B from 711 to 31,153 U/L (median, 1260 U/L). These differences were not significant statistically. Serum amylase values in group A ranged from 104 to 2985 U/L (median, 331 U/L) and in group B from 423 to 13,000 (median, 1187 U/L). Although these figures were statistically different (P less than 0.005), there was a considerable degree of overlap in the values between the two groups. The lipase/amylase ratio calculated from the blood sample obtained at presentation appeared to be a promising discriminatory index. The lipase/amylase ratio was calculated by using the amylase and lipase levels expressed as multiples of the upper limit of normal in each case. The lipase/amylase ratios in the alcoholic group ranged from 2.2 to 14.8, whereas the lipase/amylase ratio in nonalcoholic pancreatitis ranged from 0.31 to 1.93. These differences were statistically significant (P less than 0.005). A lipase/amylase ratio of greater than 2 was indicative of an alcoholic etiology, and a ratio of less than 2 suggested that the pancreatitis was nonalcoholic in nature. In phase two, this lipase/amylase ratio of 2 was applied prospectively to an unselected population of 21 consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis. Thirteen patients had a lipase/amylase ratio of greater than 2; in 11 of them, the etiology of the pancreatitis was alcohol. Eight patients had a lipase/amylase ratio of less than 2; of them, only 1 patient had an alcoholic etiology for the pancreatitis. These differences were statistically significant (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Sensitivity and specificity of blood amylase, amylase and creatinine clearance ratio and urinary amylase/urinary creatinine ratio in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis

The sensitivity and specificity of amylasemia, the ratios of amylase/creatinine clearance and amylasuria/creatininuria were determined in four groups of patients: a control group (n = 43), patients with acute pancreatitis detected on computed tomography (n = 30, 25 cases of alcoholic pancreatitis), patients with an acute surgical abdomen without pancreatitis (n = 25), and patients with renal failure (n = 20). Sensitivity was defined for the acute pancreatitis group and specificity for the other groups. When amylasemia was greater than 20 UI/dl and the amylasuria/creatininuria ratio greater than 100, sensitivity was 98 per cent. The specificity of these two results in patients with an acute surgical abdomen was 98 per cent. When the ratio amylase/creatinine clearance ratio was greater than 4 sensitivity was 73 per cent and specificity in patients with acute surgical abdomen was 75 per cent. These two values were lower than those of the two preceding tests (p less than 0.01). Sensitivity of the association of an amylasemia greater than 13 UI/dl (m + 2SD) with a clearance ratio greater than 4 was 73 per cent. The amylase/creatinine clearance ratio did not seem to be reliable since its change was delayed with respect to the increase of amylasemia and amylasuria. This ratio has a poor specificity as it increased when the clearance of creatinine decreased in the group with an acute surgical abdomen associated with functional or organic renal failure. In these two groups, the correlation between the amylase/creatinine clearance ratio and creatininemia was significant. This suggested that the clearance of creatinine fell more rapidly than the clearance of amylase as renal failure increased.     

Serum amylase in patients with renal insufficiency and renal failure.

Results vary with regard to the upper limits of serum amylase seen in patients with renal failure, and very little has been reported with patients with renal insufficiency not yet requiring dialysis. To determine the level of serum amylase elevation in renal insufficiency and renal failure, we determined serum amylase values in 128 subjects with creatinine clearances less than 90 ml/min. Serum amylase remained in the normal range when creatinine clearance was greater than 50 ml/min, and did not become elevated until creatinine clearance was less than 50 ml/min. The highest serum amylase recorded in the absence of acute pancreatitis was 503 IU/L (normal, less than 128 IU/L). Serum lipase and trypsin values paralleled those for serum amylase; values remained normal when creatinine clearance was greater than 50 ml/min, and were normal or elevated when creatinine clearance was less than 50 ml/min. These results indicate that elevations of serum amylase (i.e., amylase greater than 128 but less than 500 IU/L) in asymptomatic patients with impaired renal function are not evident until creatinine clearances fall below 50 ml/min, and probably do not represent acute pancreatitis.     

Impaired response of main pancreatic duct to secretin stimulation in early chronic pancreatitis

In the present study we compared sonographic measurements of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) following maximal secretin stimulation (75 CU intravenous in 1 min) in 15 chronic pancreatitis patients (CP) with those of 18 normal control subjects. The mean caliber of the main pancreatic duct was 1.2 +/- 0.4 mm in controls and 1.8 +/- 0.9 in patients with chronic pancreatitis (P less than 0.025). In the control group a dilatation of the duct with a peak at the third minute was found. In patients with chronic pancreatitis a flatter profile of the response curve with a slower increase and inconstant return to basal values was found. A statistically significant difference was found between absolute variations of MPD caliber over basal values (1.7 +/- 1.06 in controls vs 0.8 +/- 0.69 in CP, P less than 0.005) and the dilatation index [(Dmax - D)/D] (1.31 +/- 0.6 in controls vs 0.66 +/- 0.69 in CP, P less than 0.005). The mean percent increase at the third minute was 131% in control subjects vs 53% of patients with CP (P less than 0.0005). In the five cases of CP showing a caliber increase greater than 100%, a persistent dilatation (100-200%) was found 15 min after secretin administration. At this time, the mean percent increase over basal value in controls was 25%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Lipase/amylase ratio in biliary acute pancreatitis and alcoholic acute/acutized chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND: Alcoholic or biliary acute pancreatitis may need different therapeutic approaches. AIM: Assessing the validity of lipase/amylase ratio in differentiating biliary from alcoholic acute pancreatitis/acutized chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: Nine male patients (mean age and standard deviation: 39.8 +/- 7.0 years) with alcoholic acute pancreatitis/acutized chronic pancreatitis (group I) and 29 patients, 8 male and 21 female (mean age: 43.6 +/-19.9 years), with biliary acute pancreatitis (group II) were evaluated. Serum lipase and amylase levels were measured in patients with symptoms for no more than 48 hours. The lipase/amylase ratio was calculated based on serum lipase and amylase levels and expressed as multiples of their respective superior reference values. RESULTS: Mean levels of serum lipase (4,814 +/- 3,670 U/L) and amylase (1,282 +/- 777 U/L) in patients of group I were comparable to group II (2,697 +/- 2,391 and 1,878 +/- 1,319 U/L, respectively), but the mean lipase/amylase ratio was significantly higher in group I (4.4 +/- 3.6) than in group II (2.2 +/- 2.2). Lipase/amylase ratio >3 occurred at significantly higher proportions in patients of group I (66.7%) than of group II (24.1%), differentiating the two groups with sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 76%. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Amylase and lipase serum levels did not differ in the two groups evaluated; 2) the lipase/amylase ratio >3 was more often seen in alcoholic acute pancreatitis/acutized chronic pancreatitis than biliary acute pancreatitis, and it may be useful in differentiating these two causes of pancreatitis.     

Comparison of detectability of elevated amylase of serum and urine in pancreatic diseases by two amylase assay methods using starch substrates of different digestive rates to pancreatic amylase.

Detectability of abnormally high serum and urine amylases was investigated on patients with pancreatic diseases using amylase assays with substrates of different digestive rates to pancreatic amylase. Ratios of amylase activities determined by a chromogenic assay using a Remazolbrilliant Blue R starch (RBB assay) to those by Caraway's assay using a Lintner soluble starch (R/C ratio) were calculated on duodenal and salivary amylases obtained from 16 subjects undergoing a pancreozymin-secretin test. The R/C ratio of the duodenal amylase (M +/- SD = 0.56 +/- 0.12) was significantly higher (p less than 0.01 by F test) than that of the salivary amylase (M +/- SD = 0.36 +/- 0.10). Detectability of above-normal values of serum and urine amylases were compared with two assays in 77 pancreatic patients. The value for serum and urine amylases determined by the RBB and Caraway's assays exceeded the upper limit of normal in 37 and 58% by the RBB assay and 24 and 26% by Caraway's assay, respectively. Degrees of abnormality (ratio of the observed to the upper normal value) in serum and urine amylases were also significantly higher (p less than 0.05 for serum and p less than 0.01 upper for urine) by the RBB assay than by Caraway's assay. The RBB assay was more sensitive than Caraway's assay in detecting elevation of pancreatic amylase in serum and urine.     

Acute alcohol intoxication: significance of the amylase level

To evaluate the effects of acute alcohol intoxication on serum amylase and isoamylase levels, 58 clinically intoxicated patients with blood alcohol levels greater than 100 mg/dL were studied. Comparisons were made to normal control and a sober chronic alcoholic group. Admitting serum isoamylase levels were determined by cellulose acetate membrane electrophoresis and serum amylase levels measured by the Amylochrome technique. The average blood alcohol level in the intoxicated group was 301 +/- 99 mg/dL. Thirty of the 58 patients had hyperamylasemia (greater than 207 IU). Twenty-five of these 30 patients had hyperamylasemia from nonpancreatic sources (increased salivary isoamylase). Two of the 30 patients had pancreatic hyperamylasemia and three patients had elevated levels of both isoamylases. Neither of the patients with pancreatic hyperamylasemia had clinical evidence of acute pancreatitis. Although nine of the 58 patients had abdominal pain and clinical symptoms suggestive of acute pancreatitis, none of these patients had elevated pancreatic isoamylase. The finding of hyperamylasemia in acutely intoxicated patients is common. This is most frequently due to a rise in the salivary (nonpancreatic) isoamylase. The reliability of the total serum amylase as an indication of pancreatic disease in the intoxicated patient is questioned.     

Insulin and C-peptide plasma levels in patients with severe chronic pancreatitis and fasting normoglycemia

The aim of the present study was to evaluate insulin secretion by the pancreatic B cell in a group of patients with severe chronic pancreatitis and without overt diabetes. For this purpose we have measured plasma insulin and C-peptide peripheral levels in the fasting state and after a 100-g oral glucose load in 10 patients with severe chronic pancreatitis and fasting normoglycemia, and in 10 sex-, age-, and weight-matched healthy controls. As compared to normal subjects, patients with chronic pancreatitis showed: (1) significantly higher plasma glucose levels after oral glucose load (area under the plasma glucose curve 1708 +/- 142 vs 1208 +/- 47 mmol/liter X 240 min, P less than 0.005); (2) plasma insulin levels significantly higher at fasting (0.11 +/- 0.008 vs 0.08 +/- 0.005 nmol/liter, P less than 0.01) but not after oral glucose administration (area under the plasma insulin curve 79 +/- 12 vs 88 +/- 16 nmol/liter X 240 min); (3) significantly lower plasma C-peptide concentrations both in the fasting state (0.15 +/- 0.01 vs 0.54 +/- 0.05 nmol/liter, P less than 0.001) and after oral glucose load (area under the plasma C-peptide curve 211 +/- 30 vs 325 +/- 37 nmol/liter X 240 min, P less than 0.05). The finding of diminished plasma C-peptide levels suggests that chronic pancreatitis is associated with an impaired B-cell function even in the absence of overt diabetes. The increased or unchanged plasma insulin levels in spite of decreased plasma C-peptide concentrations indicate that in chronic pancreatitis insulin metabolism is reduced, most likely within the liver.     

Simultaneous measurement of gastric acid and duodenal alkali secretion by in situ titration in health and disease.

We have devised a technique for simultaneously measuring the acid secretion into the stomach and alkali into the duodenum by in situ titration using a modification of the technique of Fordtran and Walsh. Using this technique, the results of acid and alkali secretion measured simultaneously were identical with those obtained using the conventional aspiration method on separate days. In response to stimulation with pentagastrin acid output was 17.2 +/- 1.4 vs 15.4 +/- 1.9 mmol/h and alkali response with secretin was 16.0 +/- 0.8 vs 14.4 +/- 1.5 mmol/h. The response to food was measured in 10 control subjects, 10 patients with duodenal ulcer, and 10 patients with pancreatitis. In controls, the acid and alkaline secretion were similar (15.8 +/- 1.7 vs 18.2 +/- 1.3 mmol/h), in patients with duodenal ulcer acid secretion was significantly greater than alkaline secretion (31.9 +/- 2.2 vs 21.9 +/- 1.7 mmol/h), and in patients with pancreatitis the alkali secretion was significantly less than acid (19.8 +/- 1.9 mmol/h acid vs 11.4 +/- 0.6 mmol/h alkali). It can, therefore, be concluded that in response to food the patients with duodenal ulcer are significant hypersecretors of acid (DU acid greater than DU alkali output) and patients with pancreatitis are significant hyposecretors of alkali (pancreatitis-alkaline output less than acid output) and normal subjects secrete equal amounts of acid and alkali.     

Relation of diagnostic serum amylase levels to aetiology and severity of acute pancreatitis.

The sensitivity of diagnostic serum amylase (greater than 1000 iu/l) was assessed in 417 patients with acute pancreatitis as a result of gall stones (258), alcohol (104), or miscellaneous causes (55), of whom 111 (27%) had a clinically severe attack (including 34 deaths). On hospital admission, an amylase value diagnostic of pancreatitis was found in 96.1% of all mild cases and in 87.4% of severe cases (p less than 0.001); at 48 hours these values were 33.3% and 48.2% respectively (p = 0.026). Diagnostic amylase levels for alcoholic patients were found in 86% of mild cases on admission and in 76% of severe cases (p less than 0.001, compared with other groups). The diagnostic levels were also significantly lower at 24 hours for both the alcoholic and miscellaneous groups compared with the gall stone group (p less than 0.001). Eight of 27 (30%) patients with a serum amylase activity less than 1000 iu/l had pancreatic necrosis compared with 12 of the remaining 390 (3.1%) patients (p less than 0.001); the mortality was also significantly different (44% v 5.6% respectively, p less than 0.001). These data support the view that more sensitive tests for acute pancreatitis are needed for routine use especially in those whose disease has an alcoholic aetiology.     

Ultrastructural study of eosinophils from patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome: a morphological basis of hypodense eosinophils

We investigated the ultrastructural characteristics and the granule major basic protein (MBP) content of hypodense eosinophils from patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome who had at least 90% hypodense eosinophils in their peripheral blood and compared these cells to normodense eosinophils from normal persons. The hypodense cells (density less than 1.082) contained significantly less MBP than normodense (density greater than 1.082) eosinophils (P less than .001) as measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Electron microscopic examination demonstrated a mean of 25.0 +/- 4.4 (X +/- 1 SD) granules per hypodense cell, compared to 30.6 +/- 8.4 granules per cell in the normodense group (P less than .1). The most striking difference between the hypodense and normodense eosinophils was the small individual granule size (X = .14 +/- .05 v .26 +/- .05 micron 2, respectively, P less than .001), and the smaller total granule area (3.2 +/- 1.8 vs 7.7 +/- 3.1 micron 2, respectively, P less than .001). Because the cytoplasmic areas were similar in the two groups, the mean percent area of cytoplasm occupied by granules was significantly lower in the hypodense group (P less than .001). The finding of consistently smaller granules in the presence of equal or fewer granules per cell in the hypodense eosinophils may explain the lower MBP content and thus provide a morphologic basis for the low density of eosinophils in patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome.     

Pain at 24 hours associated with amylase levels greater than 5 times the upper normal limit as the most reliable indicator of post-ERCP pancreatitis

BACKGROUND: The frequency of post-ERCP/sphincterotomy pancreatitis is between 1.3% and 7.6% in prospective studies. This range likely reflects differences in definitions of pancreatitis and methods of data collection. METHODS: To identify clinical findings and enzymatic values consistent for clinical pancreatitis at 24 hours, the post-ERCP/sphincterotomy course of 1185 procedures was prospectively recorded. Patients were evaluated for pancreatic-type pain, white blood cell count, and serum amylase before and 24 hours after the procedure; pain and amylase levels were also recorded 6 to 8 hours after the procedure. CT was performed in all patients with pain associated with amylase levels greater than 3 times normal. All patients were evaluated clinically at 48 hours. RESULTS: Pancreatic-type pain never occurred in cases with amylase levels lower than 3 times normal; it was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with amylase levels greater than 5 times normal, either 6 to 8 hours or 24 hours after the procedure. Leukocytosis and CT findings consistent with pancreatitis were observed only in patients (41.7% and 29.5%, respectively) with 24-hour amylase levels greater than 5 times normal. None of the 18 patients with pain at 24 hours and serum amylase lower than 5 times normal had symptoms that persisted at 48 hours. Twenty-five (41.7%) of the 60 patients with pain at 24 hours and amylase higher than 5 times normal had 48-hour pain at 48 hours and hyperamylasemia. CONCLUSIONS: Features consistent with clinical pancreatitis were present only among patients with pancreatic-type pain at 24 hours and amylase levels higher than 5 times normal. Additional follow-up is required for these patients.     

Hyperamylasaemia and acute pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Hyperamylasaemia and acute pancreatitis are the more common complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Ninety patients who underwent ERCP +/- endoscopic papillotomy were monitored for rises in the serum amylase and the development of acute pancreatitis. The incidence of hyperamylasaemia (greater than 300 IU/L) was significantly greater (p = 0.01) when the pancreatic duct was imaged (75%) than with bile duct imaging alone (33%). The incidence of acute pancreatitis following imaging of the pancreatic duct +/- bile duct was 11.3% and was found to be significantly increased in those patients (n = 9) who also underwent endoscopic papillotomy. Imaging of the biliary tree only +/- endoscopic papillotomy carried no significant risk of acute pancreatitis. In those patients who developed pancreatitis, the rise in serum amylase occurred early and was significantly higher at 2 h following ERCP. These findings may help to identify patients who are at risk of developing this complication.     

Serum amylase and lipase activities in normal pregnancy: a prospective case-control study

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis during pregnancy is usually based on the association of upper abdominal pain, nausea or vomiting, and elevated serum amylase or lipase activities. The changes in these enzymatic activities have not been clearly established during normal pregnancy. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate serum amylase and lipase activities in healthy pregnant women. METHODS: Serum amylase and lipase activities were measured in 103 pregnant women (first trimester, n = 34; second trimester, n = 36; third trimester, n = 33) and in 103 nonpregnant women matched for age and not receiving oral contraception. RESULTS: Serum amylase activity was similar in pregnant women and nonpregnant women during all trimesters of pregnancy. Serum lipase activity was significantly lower during the first trimester of pregnancy compared to nonpregnant women (48.6+/-27.6 vs 59.2+/-29.3 IU/L, p < 0.05) and compared to the third trimester (48.6+/-27.6 vs 76.3+/-35.8 IU/L, p < 0.001). Serum lipase activity was not statistically different between pregnant and nonpregnant women during the second and third trimesters. CONCLUSION: An increase in serum amylase and lipase activities during pregnancy should be taken into account, as in nonpregnant women.