A prospective analysis of elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the elderly

The effectiveness of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the elderly was evaluated in a prospective study of 656 consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Forty-six percent of the patients were younger than 65 years, and 13% were in the age group above 79 years. Initial complaints and final endoscopic diagnosis were related to sex and age. Statistically significant age-related differences in outcome diagnosis were found for gastritis in younger men (p less than 0.01) and negative examinations in younger women (p less than 0.01). Duodenitis (p less than 0.05) and duodenal ulcer disease (p less than 0.05) occurred more frequently in men, whereas hiatal hernia was more frequent in women (p less than 0.05). Older people presented with a more nonspecific pattern of complaints and symptoms, but, nevertheless, a good correlation was observed between complaints and endoscopic abnormalities in the elderly compared with a younger group. Since esophagogastroduodenoscopy was well tolerated and did not provoke a higher incidence of complications in the elderly, it was concluded that endoscopic evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal tract is a safe and effective examination for the investigation of upper abdominal complaints in a geriatric patient population.     

Bacteremia after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

During 24 months, 200 upper gastrointestinal endoscopies were performed on 193 patients. Blood cultures were obtained before and five and 30 minutes after the procedure using thiol (50 ml) and trypticase soy broth (100 ml) media. The mean endoscopic time was 34 minutes. Sixteen patients developed bacteremia (8%). Twelve groups of microorganisms were detected in positive blood cultures: Streptococcus (5 species), Lactobacillus sp, Veillonella alcalescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Staph epidermidis, Propioni-bacterium acnes, Corynebacterium acnes, and Bacillus subtilis. Seven patients had positive blood cultures at five and 30 minutes, eight at five minutes, and one at 30 minutes only. There was no clear correlation of bacteremia with the age or previous history of the patient, biopsy, active bleeding, endoscopic time, or findings. A follow-up study of all patients for six months to two years indicated no complications related to endoscopy and/or bacteremia.     

Bacteremia with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Fifty patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal fiberoptic endoscopy were studied prospectively for the development of bacteremia by aerobic and anerobic blood cultures obtained before, during, and at 5 and 30 minutes after the procedure. Forty-six patients were culture negative; four had positive cultures at 5 or 30 minutes after the procedure, or at both times. The level of bacteremia as estimated by pour plates was very low. Bacteremia did not correlate with the performance of biopsy or the type of mucosal abnormality found. It is concluded that only very high-risk patients should receive antimicrobial prophylaxis before this procedure. The minor risk of this low-level bacteremia should not be considered a contraindication to the performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.     

Aspiration in the context of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary aspiration is a life-threatening complication of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, the incidence of which has not been determined. Endoscopy-related aspiration has not been studied in procedures in which patients swallow a radiolabelled potential aspirate immediately before endoscopy and undergo nuclear scanning postprocedure. METHODS: A pilot study was conducted in which 200 MBq of nonabsorbable technetium-99m phytate in 10 mL of water was administered orally to 50 patients who were about to undergo endoscopy. Gamma camera images were obtained to ensure that there had been no aspiration before endoscopy. After endoscopy, a repeat scan was performed. Fluid aspirated through the endoscope was also collected and analyzed for radioactivity using a hand-held radiation monitor. RESULTS: No evidence of pulmonary aspiration was found in any of the patients studied. The mean estimated percentage of the initially administered radioactivity aspirated through the endoscope was 2.66% (range 0% to 10.3%). CONCLUSION: The present pilot study confirms earlier observations that clinically significant aspiration in the context of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is uncommon. The incidence of aspiration may, however, be different in acutely bleeding patients undergoing endoscopy. For logistic reasons, this group could not be studied.     

Informed consent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Informed consent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy requires that the patient understands the nature of, and reason for, the proposed procedure, and that he or she is given adequate time to deliberate and ask questions. In a prospective study, 200 outpatients completed questionnaires immediately before, and one day after, endoscopy, which assessed satisfaction with information provided by: (a) the referring doctor, (b) a standard information sheet sent out two to four weeks before endoscopy, and (c) the endoscopist. The first 100 patients were asked to read and sign a standard consent form immediately before the endoscopy. In the second 100 patients, a new endoscopy consent form that was simpler and easier to read than the standard form was sent out with the information sheet. Patients were directed to sign the new consent form before arriving at the unit only if they had no further questions. Overall, the indication for the endoscopy, and how it would be done, were explained clearly by the referring doctor in 79% and 68% of cases, respectively. Of the first 100 patients, only 54% had read the standard consent form in the endoscopy unit before signing it. In contrast, of the second 100 patients, the new form sent with the information sheet was read by 95%, and signed by 88% before coming to the unit. Furthermore, 84% found the new form easier to read and understand than the standard form. In our unit, roughly one quarter of patients referred for endoscopy are not adequately informed about the procedure. In contrast with the standard consent form, a simple endoscopy consent form sent out with the information sheet is preferred by most patients, and safeguards against patients undergoing endoscopy without informed consent.     

Characteristics and outcomes of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding after therapeutic endoscopy in the elderly

AIM: To characterize the effects of age on clinical presentations and endoscopic diagnoses and to determine outcomes after endoscopic therapy among patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) compared with those aged < 65 years. METHODS: Medical records and an endoscopy data-base of 526 consecutive patients with overt UGIB admitted during 2007-2009 were reviewed. The initial presentations and clinical course within 30 d after endoscopy were obtained. RESULTS: A total o...     

Comparison of emergent endoscopy and upper gastrointestinal series radiography in acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

A prospective study of early diagnostic procedures in acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage was conducted in a series of 76 patients. The diagnostic procedures included upper gastrointestinal series radiography (UGIS) and endoscopy (ENDO). The clinicians' diagnosis and management improved in a statistically significant way as a result of the findings of endoscopy. The findings of UGIS did not significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and resulted in a statistically significant adverse effect on patient management. The results suggest that endoscopy is more effective in promoting early accurate diagnosis and management in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.     

Effect of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy on cardiopulmonary changes in very old patients

Although routine gastroscopy is regarded as a safe examination, it is sometimes associated, especially in elderly patients, with serious arrhythmias. We studied the influence of gastroscopy in very old patients on the occurrence and number of ECG changes and on oxygen saturation. Electrocardiographic (ECG) changes on a 24 h Holter recording and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) changes measured by pulse oximetry were observed in 37 hospitalized patients aged 80 years or more undergoing gastroscopy without premedication or conscious sedation and with supplementary oxygen (2 l/min). Gastroscopy did not induce significant arterial oxygen desaturation. ST changes were greatest or equal to that during gastroscopy in 16 (48%) patients. The number of VES increased during the 1-h period after gastroscopy, especially in those patients with an ST level change of over 1 mm h after gastroscopy (P=0.01) and in patients suffering from heart disease (P=0.007). In other arrhythmias no significant change was observed and no fatal complications occurred. Gastroscopy is a safe procedure also in very old patients. However, it induces increased number of VES after endoscopy in patients suffering from heart disease. In those patients a close follow-up of adverse symptoms is advisable, also for a short period after gastroscopy.     

Arterial oxygen tension changes in elderly patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. I. Possible causes.

Measurement of arterial oxygen tensions in elderly patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and in a matched control group undergoing colonoscopy showed a slight but significant fall in the PaO2 in both groups following premedication. The initial fall in PaO2 was probably due to the intravenous atropine, diazepam, and meperidine, mainly the latter. This fall of the oxygen tension continued in the gastroscopy group until the instrument was removed, while the controls rapidly returned to basal levels. This persistently reduced PaO2 in the former group is therefore most likely due to the physical presence of the endoscope in the pharynx. To minimize the occurrence of hypoxemia during gastroscopy, narcotics should probably not be used in the premedication of elderly patients. The procedure should be carried out after optimal oxygenation of the patient and be of short duration, and a narrow instrument may be useful in this group.     

Premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Premedication is not essential to endoscopy but patient tolerance is clearly improved and, thus, ease of examination. Although comparable results can be achieved through nonpharmacologic means, the time and effort involved precludes their widespread use. Despite near universal utilization of premedication in endoscopy, the associated risk is difficult to determine from the available literature. The reported data reveal nominal risk yet must be viewed as minimums. The ideal drug with predictable clinical effects, minimal postprocedure impairment, little respiratory compromise, and proven antagonist is not yet available. Although midazolam seems to represent an advance, recent emphasis on respiratory depression is particularly troublesome. Studies evaluating various agents have suffered from lack of quantitation of such parameters as patient tolerance, ease of examination, and postprocedure impairment. Development of proven standards for these parameters would have to occur before a definitive double-blind randomized trial could be undertaken. Suggested means of assessing these parameters are listed in Table I. Improvement in major morbidity would be difficult in light of its low incidence. As the search for the ideal drug continues, endoscopists must continue to use drugs whose full effects are incompletely understood. The ability to increase patient comfort must be balanced with the small, but ever present, risk of morbidity and mortality.     

Arrhythmias during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Electrocardiographic monitoring of 52 consecutive patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed that arrhythmias during the procedures were common (38.5%) and tended to occur more frequently in the elderly (75%), in persons with heart disease (54.5%), and in persons with chronic lung disease (89%). The incidence of ventricular premature contractions in patient with no evidence of heart or lung disease was 19%. In one patient with advanced chronic lung disease, the procedure had to be terminated because of development of high-degree atrioventricular block. A high incidence of arrhythmias during endoscopy has not been previously reported in patients with chronic lung disease.     

Magnifying endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal tract]

For the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal (GI) lesions, magnification method is usually used in conjunction with chromoscopy, enabling the endoscopist to view subtle mucosal patterns in exquisite detail. Recently published datas have shown that magnifying endoscopy might be a valuable adjunct for the diagnosis, detection, and characterization of inflammatory and neoplastic lesions of the upper GI tract. It is also proven to be an useful surveillance protocol in identifying dysplastic epithelium or early cancer within a segment of Barrett's esophagus. Possible indications for magnifying endoscopy in upper GI tract include screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus, defining the extent of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma, detecting synchronous/metachronous gastric and esophageal cancers, diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection, and recognizing minimal mucosal changes in gastroesophageal reflux disease. By grading the quality of evidence for the currently published trials, it is clear that the majority are case series, case reports, and/or observational studies without randomization, control, or blinding. Moreover, other evidence-based criteria such as independent, blind comparisons of magnifying endoscopy with a standard method which evaluates this technology in an appropriate spectrum of patients to whom the test may be applicable, and standardizing methodology would be crucial before magnifying endoscopy becomes a standard procedure in clinical practice. In the future, a uniform classification system for staining and magnifying patterns should be devised and observer agreement should be tested. Futher studies then could be performed based upon consistent, validated, and standardized terminologies and criteria.