Diagnostic performance of the Roche AMPLICOR PCR in detecting Neisseria gonorrhoeae in genitourinary specimens from female sex workers in Cotonou, Benin

The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Roche multiplex AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis/Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR test for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in female urine specimens and wet and dry endocervical swabs. Endocervical swabs and urine specimens were collected from 342 female sex workers from Cotonou, Benin, and were tested using the AMPLICOR C. trachomatis/N. gonorrhoeae test (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) with internal control detection. Endocervical swabs were also cultured on Thayer-Martin medium. A series of alternate standards that included a combination of all the tests but not the test being evaluated was used to assess the performance of the test with each type of specimen. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the urine were 53.8, 98.9, 93.5, and 87.5%, respectively. Corresponding figures for the wet swab were 91.5, 100, 100, and 97.4%, respectively. Those for the dry swab were 96.3, 96.2, 88.5, and 98.8%, respectively. Based on this study, the AMPLICOR PCR assay showed a low sensitivity for detection of N. gonorrhoeae infection in urine specimens, whereas the test was found to be highly sensitive and specific with endocervical specimens.     

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare three commercially available nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. Roche PCR and Becton Dickinson strand displacement amplification (SDA) were performed on 733 endocervical swab specimens from commercial sex workers. Abbott ligase chain reaction (LCR) was performed on a subset of 396 samples. Endocervical specimens from all women were also tested by culture for N. gonorrhoeae and by Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for C. trachomatis. A positive N. gonorrhoeae result was defined as a positive result by culture or by two NAATs, and a positive C. trachomatis result was defined as a positive result by two tests. According to these definitions, the sensitivities and specificities for the subsample of 396 specimens of N. gonorrhoeae culture, PCR, SDA, and LCR were 69.8, 95.2, 88.9, and 88.9% and 100, 99.4, 100, and 99.1%, respectively; the sensitivities and specificities of C. trachomatis EIA, PCR, SDA, and LCR were 42.0, 98.0, 94.0, and 90.0% and 100, 98.0, 100, and 98.6%, respectively. The performance characteristics of N. gonorrhoeae culture, PCR, and SDA and C. trachomatis EIA, PCR, and SDA for all 733 specimens were defined without inclusion of LCR results and by discrepant analysis after resolution of discordant N. gonorrhoeae PCR results and of discordant C. trachomatis EIA and PCR results by LCR testing. The sensitivities of N. gonorrhoeae culture, PCR, and SDA before and after LCR resolution were 67.8, 95.7, and 93.9% and 65, 95.8, and 90.0%, respectively. The sensitivities of C. trachomatis EIA, PCR, and SDA decreased from 39.4, 100, and 100% to 38.7, 98.7, and 94.7%, respectively. All three NAATs proved to be superior to N. gonorrhoeae culture and to C. trachomatis EIA. The accuracies of the different NAATs were quite similar. SDA was the only amplification assay with 100% specificity for detection of both N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis in endocervical specimens.     

Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Two assays for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae were compared: the LCx Probe system (the LCx system; Abbott Diagnostic Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.) and the COBAS AMPLICOR C. trachomatis/N. gonorrhoeae system (the COBAS AMPLICOR system; Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, N.J.). Endocervical swab specimens, male urethral swab specimens, and female and male urine specimens were collected from 503 female and 498 male visitors attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Prevalences for C. trachomatis were 12.5% (63 of 503) and 10.0% (50 of 498) in females and males, respectively. The prevalences for N. gonorrhoeae were 1.2% (6 of 503) and 4.2% (21 of 498) in females and males, respectively. Both assays showed high values for sensitivity and specificity with regard to the detection of C. trachomatis in endocervical swab specimens, male urethral swab specimens, and female and male urine specimens. The sensitivities for the LCx system were 92.1, 90.0, 88.9, and 94.0% for each type of specimen, respectively; and the sensitivies for the COBAS AMPLICOR system were 96.8, 98.0, 82.5, and 92.0% for each type of specimen, respectively. Specificities ranged between 98.4 and 100%. The sensitivity of the LCx system for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae was 100% for female cervical swab and urine specimens and male urethral swab specimens, while for male urine specimens the sensitivity was 95.2%; the specificity was 100% for all types of specimens. For the detection of N. gonorrhoeae by the COBAS AMPLICOR assay, the sensitivity for female cervical swab and male urethral swab specimens was 100%, that for female urine specimens was 66.7%, and that for male urine specimens was 95.2%. However, the predictive values of a positive test for female cervical swab specimens and urine specimens were 31.6 and 36.4%, respectively. Sequence analysis of the amplimers obtained by an in-house 16S rRNA PCR of the solely COBAS AMPLICOR system-positive swab specimens revealed neither N. gonorrhoeae nor other Neisseria spp. The COBAS AMPLICOR assay was considered not suitable for screening for infections with N. gonorrhoeae. If this assay is used for detection of N. gonorrhoeae, confirmation of positive results by a reliable test is mandatory.     

Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.

Screening of urine specimens from men for Chlamydia trachomatis infection by a commercial PCR assay (AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test; Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) is a sensitive and specific noninvasive diagnostic assay. Since screening of women for C. trachomatis infection with the AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test has been limited to use with endocervical swab specimens, we conducted an evaluation of the AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test for the detection of C. trachomatis using female urine samples and compared the results of those obtained by in vitro culture and PCR of endocervical swab specimens. For 713 men we compared the performance of AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test with urine specimens with that of culture of urethral specimens. For specimens that were PCR positive and culture negative, two additional tests were used to resolve the discrepancies: direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) of sediment from a spun endocervical specimen culture vial and major outer membrane protein-based PCR of the sediment from the endocervical specimen culture vial. Of 525 urine specimens from females, 67 (12.8%) were PCR positive, and 41 (7.8%) endocervical specimens from the 525 women were culture positive. After resolution of the discrepancies, the resolved sensitivity of the urine PCR was 93.3%, whereas the sensitivity of endocervical swab specimen culture was 67.3%. Of 468 female endocervical swab specimens, 47 (10.0%) had a positive PCR result and 33 (7.0%) were culture positive. The resolved sensitivity of the endocervical swab specimen PCR was 86%. Of 415 matched female urine and endocervical swab specimens, there were 49 confirmed infections; 30 (61.2%) specimens were positive by culture of the endocervical swab specimen, 40 (81.6%) were positive by confirmed endocervical swab specimen PCR, 43 (87.8%) were positive by confirmed urine PCR, and all 49 (100%) were positive by either endocervical swab specimen PCR or urine PCR. For men, the resolved sensitivity of the urine PCR was 88%, and the sensitivity of culture was only 50.7%. These results indicate that urine PCR is highly sensitive for the detection of C. trachomatis in both women and men and provides a noninvasive technique for routine screening for chlamydial infection.     

Evaluation of automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR system for detection of several infectious agents and its impact on laboratory management.

We evaluated the COBAS AMPLICOR (CA) PCR system (Roche Diagnostic Systems) designed for automated PCR amplification and detection of nucleic acids from infectious agents in clinical samples. The Roche AMPLICOR microwell plate (MWP) PCR was the reference method. CA amplifies target nucleic acid, captures the biotinylated amplification products by using magnetic particles coated with specific oligonucleotide probes, and detects the bound products colorimetrically. For Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the correlation of the results of CA tests with those of MWP tests was 100% with 230 samples, including 20 culture-positive samples. For hepatitis C virus, the correlation was 100% with 214 samples, including 60 positive samples. MultiPlex CA analysis of 199 cervical specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and the internal control gave 100% concordance. These samples included 19 C. trachomatis and 3 N. gonorrhoeae culture-positive samples. Overall, the agreement between PCR methods for all 842 comparisons was 100%. Compared with culture, the sensitivities of the assays for C. trachomatis and M tuberculosis were > or = 95%. After spiking alternating amplification tubes in the CA system with 10(14) copies of the Chlamydia amplicon per ml, we were unable to demonstrate any carryover cross-contamination of negative samples. Using the criteria of the College of American Pathologists workload recording method, we found that the total hands-on time to produce CA PCR results was 4.4, 7.9, and 3.3 min for M. tuberculosis, hepatis C virus, and the MultiPlexed assay for chlamydia plus gonorrhea and an internal control, respectively. The CA system brings true PCR automation to laboratories. In addition to the accuracy of automated results, the CA system provides labor savings, provides containment of the amplification and detection components of PCR, and supports both MultiPlex amplification and sequential algorithm (ReFlex) detection of analytes.     

Evaluation of nucleic acid-based test (PACE 2C) for simultaneous detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in endocervical specimens.

A nucleic acid-based test (Gen-Probe PACE 2C System) was evaluated for the ability to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae from endocervical specimens in a single assay. Three swab samples, randomized for collection order, were obtained from each patient and tested by N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis culture and by the PACE 2C probe assay. Fifty of 395 specimens were culture positive for N. gonorrhoeae (17 specimens), C. trachomatis (26 specimens), or both (7 specimens), of which PACE 2C testing detected 48 specimens. The PACE 2C assay was positive for 56 specimens, including 8 specimens not positive by culture. Of the total of 10 discrepancies between culture and PACE 2C results, resolution testing yielded four false-negative culture, four false-positive PACE 2C, and two false-negative PACE 2C results. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for PACE 2C after reevaluation were 96.3, 98.8, 92.9 and 99.4%, respectively. The overall sensitivities for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae culture were 89.2 and 88.9%, respectively. The prevalence rate for C. trachomatis was 9.4%, and that for N. gonorrhoeae was 6.8%. The Gen-Probe PACE 2C System is a reliable alternative for screening endocervical specimens for both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in a single assay.     

Abilities of APTIMA, AMPLICOR, and ProbeTec assays to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in PreservCyt ThinPrep Liquid-based Pap samples

Infections with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are often asymptomatic. Liquid-based Pap (L-Pap) screening may provide samples for testing by commercial assays. Women attending a health clinic or a street youth clinic had a PreservCyt ThinPrep sample and a cervical swab (CS) collected. The L-Pap sample was tested for cytopathology; then 1 ml was transferred to an L-Pap specimen transfer tube for testing by the Gen-Probe APTIMA assays (APTIMA Combo 2 [AC2], APTIMA C. trachomatis [ACT], and APTIMA N. gonorrhoeae [AGC]). The residual L-Pap sample was tested for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae using Roche AMPLICOR (AMP) and Becton Dickinson ProbeTec (PT). The CS was tested by AC2. A patient was considered infected if two specimens were positive or if a single specimen was positive in two tests. The prevalence of infection was 10% (29/290) for C. trachomatis and 2.4% (7/290) for N. gonorrhoeae. Most of the positive patients had specimens that were reactive in all assays (20/29 for C. trachomatis; 6/7 for N. gonorrhoeae). Four patients had double infections. The sensitivities and specificities of the various tests for the specimens tested were as follows. For C. trachomatis on L-Pap, sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 98.1%, respectively, for ACT, 93.1 and 98.8% for AC2, 86.2 and 91.2% for AMP, and 72.4 and 92.7% for PT. For N. gonorrhoeae on L-Pap, sensitivity and specificity were 100% for both AGC and AC2, 85.7 and 100% for AMP, and 85.7 and 100% for PT. For AC2 with CSs, sensitivity and specificity were 93.1 and 98.5%, respectively, for C. trachomatis, and both were 100% for N. gonorrhoeae. There were significant differences in sensitivity and specificity (P < 0.001). The APTIMA assays were more sensitive and specific than AMP or PT for detecting women's C. trachomatis and/or N. gonorrhoeae infections by testing ThinPrep samples.     

Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime CT/NG assay in comparison to the Roche Cobas Amplicor CT/NG assay

Several commercial methods exist for the molecular detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in clinical samples. Here we evaluated the performance characteristics of the newly FDA-cleared Abbott RealTime CT/NG assay (where "CT" stands for Chlamydia trachomatis and "NG" stands for Neisseria gonorrhoeae) that uses the automated m2000 molecular platform. Results were compared to those of the Roche Cobas Amplicor CT/NG assay. A total of 926 cervical swab, 45 female urine, 6 male urethral swab, and 407 male urine specimens from 1,384 patients were examined. After resolving all Roche N. gonorrhoeae-positive results with two additional real-time PCR assays, we found that the agreement between the assays was excellent. For urine samples, there was 99.6% positive agreement and 97.7% negative agreement for C. trachomatis, and for male urine samples, there was 100% positive agreement and 99.7% negative agreement for N. gonorrhoeae. For cervical swab samples, there was 98.8% positive agreement and 98.5% negative agreement for C. trachomatis, and there was 96.6% positive agreement and 99.8% negative agreement for N. gonorrhoeae. In limiting dilution analyses, we found that the Abbot assay was more sensitive than the Roche assay for both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae. In addition, there appeared to be an enhanced ability of the Abbott assay to detect dual infections, especially in the presence of large amounts of N. gonorrhoeae and small amounts of C. trachomatis organisms. In summary, we conclude that the Abbott RealTime CT/NG assay is an accurate and automated new addition to the available testing options for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae.     

Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary specimens from men and women by a coamplification PCR assay.

A coamplification PCR test for the direct detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in urethral and endocervical swabs and urine samples from men and women was compared to standard culture techniques. Processed specimens were amplified in single reaction tubes containing primers for both organisms, and PCR products were detected by a colorimetric microwell plate hybridization assay specific for each pathogen. Of 344 specimens from men, 45 (13.1%) urine specimens were PCR positive for C. trachomatis, 51 (14.8%) urethral swab specimens were PCR positive, and 29 urethral swab specimens (8.4%) were culture positive. After analysis of discrepancies, the resolved sensitivity and specificity of PCR for C. trachomatis were 96.2 and 99.3%, respectively, in urethral swab specimens, compared to 88.2 and 98.6% for urine specimens. Of the 192 specimens from women, 28 (14.6%) urine specimens were PCR positive for C. trachomatis, 32 (16.7%) endocervical specimens were PCR positive, and 19 (9.9%) endocervical specimens were culture positive. After analysis of discrepancies, the resolved sensitivity and specificity of PCR for C. trachomatis for endocervical specimens were both 100% compared to 100 and 99.4%, respectively, for urine specimens from women. In men, 68 (19.8%) urine specimens were PCR positive for N. gonorrhoeae, 73 (21.2%) urethral swabs were PCR positive, and 59 (17.2%) urethral swabs were culture positive. After analysis of discrepancies, the resolved sensitivity and specificity of PCR for N. gonorrhoeae were 97.3 and 97.0%, respectively, for urethral specimens compared to 94.4 and 98.5% for urine specimens. In women, 18 (9.4%) urine specimens were PCR positive for N. gonorrhoeae, 23 (12.0%) were endocervical swab PCR positive, and 15 (7.8%) endocervical specimens were culture positive. After analysis of discrepancies, the resolved sensitivity and specificity of PCR for N. gonorrhoeae were 100 and 99.4%, respectively, for endocervical specimens compared to 90.0 and 95.9% for female urine specimens. These results indicate that a multiplex PCR is highly sensitive for detecting both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae from a single urine or genital swab, providing a more cost-effective way of screening multiple pathogens.     

Utility of pooled urine specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in men attending public sexually transmitted infection clinics in Mumbai, India, by PCR

Pooling urogenital specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by nucleic acid amplification tests is an attractive alternative to individual testing. As pooling can reduce the costs of testing as well as labor, it has been advocated for use in resource-poor settings. However, it has neither been widely adopted nor evaluated for use in developing countries. We evaluated the practical use of pooling first-catch urine (FCU) specimens for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae from 690 men in Mumbai, India, by PCR. FCU, urethral smears, and swabs were collected from men seen at two sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. All laboratory testing was done at the Lokmanya Tilak General Hospital. Gram stain smears and culture isolation for N. gonorrhoeae were performed. Each FCU was tested individually and in pools using the Roche Amplicor PCR for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae with an internal control for inhibition. Specimen pools consisted of aliquots from five consecutively processed FCUs combined into an amplification tube. An optical density reading of > or =0.20 indicated a pool for which subsequent testing of individual samples was required. Prevalence by PCR on single specimens was 2.2% (15/690) for C. trachomatis and 5.4% (37/690) for N. gonorrhoeae. Compared to individual FCU results, pooling for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae had an overall sensitivity of 96.1% (50/52). Specificity was 96.5% (83/86) in that three pools required single testing that failed to identify a positive specimen. Pooling missed two positive specimens, decreased the inhibition rate, and saved 50.3% of reagent costs. In this resource-limited setting, the use of pooling to detect C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae by PCR proved to be a simple, accurate, and cost-effective procedure compared to individual testing.     

Evaluation of the digene hybrid capture II CT-ID test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens

The performance characteristics of the new signal amplification-based Hybrid Capture (HC) II CT-ID test system (Digene, Silver Spring, Md.) with endocervical specimens were compared to those of tissue culture and PCR (AMPLICOR CT PCR; Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.) for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in 587 women. HC II CT-ID identified 62 of 65 confirmed C. trachomatis-positive patients (sensitivity of 95.4%) and was negative for 517 of 522 patients who were negative by culture and PCR (specificity of 99.0%). Twelve of the 65 confirmed positive patients were negative by culture but were identified by both HC II CT-ID and PCR (sensitivity of culture was 81.5% [P < 0.01]). In comparison, PCR detected 59 of 65 positive specimens (sensitivity of 90.8%) and had a specificity of 99.6% (520 of 522). These results demonstrate that the Digene HC II CT-ID test is a highly sensitive and specific assay for the detection of C. trachomatis infection in endocervical specimens.     

Multiplex PCR for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Genitourinary specimens.

We developed a multiplex PCR (M-PCR) assay for the simultaneous detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. M-PCR employed C. trachomatis-specific primers KL1-KL2 and N. gonorrhoeae-specific primers HO1-HO3 and produced products of 241 and 390 bp, respectively. PCR products were easily detected by agarose gel electrophoresis and confirmed by Southern hybridization using labelled oligonucleotide probes. M-PCR had a sensitivity of 10 fg of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae DNA (equivalent to 1 to 2 genome copies). M-PCR detected the presence of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae DNA in 15 male urethral and 12 female endocervical specimens, 3 of which were positive for C. trachomatis, 18 of which were positive for N. gonorrhoeae and 6 of which were positive for both organisms. M-PCR was evaluated further by testing 200 male first void urine (FVU) specimens, of which 18 were positive by C. trachomatis PCR and Chlamydiazyme and 4 were positive by C. trachomatis PCR but negative by Chlamydiazyme. All 22 FVU specimens were positive by a confirmatory PCR using a second plasmid target and were positive by M-PCR. Ten of 11 men with cultures that were positive for N. gonorrhoeae had FVU specimens that were positive by both N. gonorrhoeae PCR and M-PCR. Two other men with negative N. gonorrhoeae urethral cultures had FVU specimens that were positive by N. gonorrhoeae PCR, by two confirmatory N. gonorrhoeae PCR assays using 165 rRNA and cytosine methyltransferase primers, and by M-PCR. The sensitivity of M-PCR for detecting C. trachomatis was 100% (22 of 22 specimens), compared with 81.8% (18 of 22 specimens) for enzyme immunoassay. Sensitivity of M-PCR for N. gonorrhoeae was 92.3% (12 of 13 specimens) compared with 84.6% (11 of 13 specimens) for urethral culture. The specificity of M-PCR was 100% for both C. trachomatis (178 of 13 specimens) and N. gonorrhoeae (187 of 187 specimens). M-PCR testing of FVU specimens provided a sensitive and noninvasive method for detecting C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infection in men.     

Multiplex AMPLICOR PCR screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women attenting non-sexually transmitted disease clinics. The European Chlamydia Epidemiology Group.

A new PCR kit (AMPLICOR CT/NG; Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) was used as a screening tool for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in first-void urine (FVU) specimens from 3,340 asymptomatic women attending European health care units for contraceptive advice or pregnancy termination. All samples were kept frozen (-20 degrees C) prior to testing. Chlamydia-positive samples were retested once by the plasmid-based PCR kit and also by a major outer membrane protein (MOMP) primer-based PCR. Discrepancies were resolved by using the direct immunofluorescence test (DIF) with the centrifuged sediment of the FVU specimens. Samples positive for N. gonorrhoeae were retested by chromosomal primer-based PCR and verified by a 16S RNA PCR. Of the samples tested, 1.8% were considered inhibitory by using the internal amplification control. Of 81 samples positive for C. trachomatis, 74 samples were positive by both plasmid- and MOMP-based PCRs, 6 samples were positive by plasmid-based PCR and DIF, and one sample was positive by both MOMP-based PCR and DIF. Nine samples (0.3%) were positive for N. gonorrhoeae by the chromosomal primer-based PCR; however, none of the results could be confirmed. The test offers the unique ability to identify inhibition of amplification with the optional internal control.     

Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens.

We compared the Roche Amplicor PCR, Roche Cobas Amplicor PCR, and Abbott LCx assays by using urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a female population. First-catch urine and endocervical swab specimens were collected from a total of 442 patients. Urine specimens were tested by the manual Roche Amplicor PCR, the automatic Roche Cobas Amplicor PCR, and the Abbott LCx assays as instructed by the manufacturers. For the Cobas Amplicor PCR, the internal control protocol was used for every specimen to reveal the presence of polymerase inhibitors. Cell culture of cervical specimens was used as a reference method. Of 442 patients, 50 (11.3%) were confirmed to have chlamydial infection. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of cell culture with cervical swab specimens were 88 and 100%, respectively. With urine specimens the sensitivity and specificity for the manual Amplicor PCR assay were 100 and 99.7%, respectively; those for the automatic Cobas Amplicor PCR assay were 94 and 99.2%, respectively; and those for the LCx assay were 94 and 100%, respectively. Thus, all amplification methods with urine specimens proved to be highly sensitive and specific for the detection of C. trachomatis infection in women. No statistically significant differences in the test performances could be demonstrated for specimens from this population. All three amplification techniques with urine specimens proved to be superior to cell culture with cervical swab specimens in diagnosing C. trachomatis infections in women.     

Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

A clinical evaluation of the Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.) is described. This new clinical system used one-step sample preparation, amplification with biotinylated cryptic plasmid primer pairs (CP24-CP27), uracil-N-glycosylase (AmpErase), and a microtiter format for amplicon capture and detection. Culture with McCoy cells in duplicate 1-dram (3.697-ml) vials with fluorescent immunostaining was the reference system. Endocervical swab samples from 945 women provided 74 culture-positive specimens, of which PCR detected 71. The initial PCR result was positive for 12 additional specimens. Arbitration of the PCR-positive, culture-negative samples by PCR with major outer membrane protein primers, duplicate culture, elementary body direct fluorescent-antibody staining, and DNA extraction PCR showed that all 12 samples were positive for chlamydia, raising the number of truly positive samples from 74 to 86. After arbitration the true sensitivities of PCR and culture were 96.5 and 86%, respectively (P = 0.02). Specificities for both were 100%. For PCR, the positive and negative predictive values were 100 and 99.7%, respectively. Total test efficiency was 99.7%. A high-test-volume (121 samples) timing study with all items included in the College of American Pathologists work load method indicated that this PCR format took approximately 3 min per sample. Because of the high sensitivity, specificity, and improved ease of handling, we found PCR to be a good alternative to culture for detection of C. trachomatis.     

Evaluation of culture and the Gen-Probe PACE 2 assay for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens transported to a state health laboratory.

The Gen-Probe PACE 2 assay (Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, Calif.) was compared with culture for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in endocervical specimens that were mailed to the laboratory. During mail transport, the specimens were exposed to extremes of hot and cold weather for several days before arriving in the laboratory. Specimens on culture plates deteriorated during transport, as evidenced by many dead gonococcus-like colonies. The manufacturer's recommendation for reporting PACE 2 assay-positive results was modified to create a suspicious category for samples with relative light units near the positive cutoff value. Of a total of 4,869 specimens tested, 30 were positive by both methods and 102 were positive only by the PACE 2 assay. These additional 102 positive specimens were likely to be true positives, as indicated by several lines of indirect evidence, including detailed probe competition analysis, patient history, and the lack of false-positive results in hand-delivered specimens. Although Gen-Probe Inc. indicates that specimens are stable for up to 7 days, N. gonorrhoeae was easily detectable by the PACE 2 assay after 1 month of incubation at room temperature in the PACE 2 transport buffer. We also compared the Gen-Probe PACE 2 assay for Chlamydia trachomatis with culture on endocervical specimens delivered by same-day courier. Of 398 endocervical specimens tested, the PACE 2 assay detected 19 of 20 culture-positive samples. Although the assay failed to detect one culture-positive sample, it was able to detect two very weak culture-suspicious samples. Finally, PACE 2 assays for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis performed on the same samples indicated that the coinfection rate was 40% for women attending five family planning clinics. We concluded that the Gen-Probe PACE 2 assay system should be considered for use in testing those specimens that are transported to the laboratory through the mail.     

Characteristics of the m2000 automated sample preparation and multiplex real-time PCR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae

We evaluated a new real-time PCR-based prototype assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae developed by Abbott Molecular Inc. This assay is designed to be performed on an Abbott m2000 real-time instrument system, which consists of an m2000sp instrument for sample preparation and an m2000rt instrument for real-time PCR amplification and detection. The limit of detection of this prototype assay was determined to be 20 copies of target DNA for both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, using serially diluted linearized plasmids. No cross-reactivity could be detected when 55 nongonococcal Neisseria isolates and 3 non-C. trachomatis Chlamydia isolates were tested at 1 million genome equivalents per reaction. Concordance with the Roche Amplicor, BDProbeTec ET, and Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo 2 tests was assessed using unlinked/deidentified surplus clinical specimens previously analyzed with these tests. For C. trachomatis, concordance for positive results ranged from 93.7% to 100%, while concordance for negative results ranged from 98.2% to 100%. For N. gonorrhoeae, concordance for positive and negative results ranged from 91.4% to 100% and 99.3% to 100%, respectively. A workflow analysis of the prototype assay was conducted to obtain information on throughput under laboratory conditions. At 48 samples/run, the time to first result for both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae was 4.5 h. A total of 135 patient specimens could be analyzed in 8.9 h, with 75 min of hands-on time. This study demonstrated the technical and clinical feasibility of the new Abbott real-time PCR C. trachomatis/N. gonorrhoeae assay.     

Performance characteristics of the Becton Dickinson ProbeTec System for direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in male and female urine specimens in comparison with the Roche Cobas System

OBJECTIVE: The Becton Dickinson BDProbeTec ET System is a new semiautomated system using strand displacement amplification technology that simultaneously amplifies and detects Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA. The strand displacement amplification products are hybridized with a fluorescent detector probe and are captured by a chemiluminescent assay in a microwell format. An amplification control is also included to monitor assay inhibition. This study evaluated the performance of the BDProbTec ET system in detecting C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae in male and female urine specimens, calculated its ability to process large volumes of specimens, and determined the inhibition rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hundred twenty-five male and 399 female urine specimens were tested for both C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae with the BDProbeTec ET system, and results were compared with those of the Roche Amplicor Cobas system. All urine specimens were processed on both assays on the same day they were received, according to the manufacturers' instructions. Discrepant results were resolved by in-house polymerase chain reaction assays. Internal or amplification controls were also used in each specimen assay to monitor inhibition. The throughput of the BDProbTec ET system was further tested with 150 urine specimens on an 8-hour shift for 2 days. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predicative value, and negative predicative value for for detection of chlamydia were 95.3%, 99.3%, 95.9%, and 99.2% for strand displacement amplification and 95.9%, 98.3%, 90.6%, and 99.3% for the Roche Amplicor system. For detection of gonorrhea, these values were 100%, 99.7%, 88.2%, and 100% and 96.7%, 98.9%, 69%, and 99.9%, respectively. The overall inhibition rates for both strand displacement amplification and Roche Amplicor were less than 3.5%. The BDProbTec ET system was able to produce 150 results each for chlamydia and gonorrhea and the internal control within the 8-hour shift. CONCLUSIONS: The performance characteristics of the BDProbeTec ET assay are similar to those of the Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction for detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea in male and female urine specimens. The system was able to produce 300 results in an 8-hour shift.     

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by strand displacement amplification and relevance of the amplification control for use with vaginal swab specimens

Vaginal swab specimens may be preferable to cervical swab or urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae because of the ease of specimen collection and transport. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether vaginal swab specimens are equivalent to cervical swab specimens for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis by the Becton Dickinson strand displacement amplification assay (SDA) with the BDProbeTec ET instrument and then to evaluate the use of the amplification control in a clinical research setting. In the first phase, vaginal and cervical swab specimens were obtained from 455 symptomatic women aged 18 to 40 attending primary health care and sexually transmitted disease clinics. Thirty-nine specimens (8.6%) had true-positive results for N. gonorrhoeae and 37 specimens (8.1%) had true-positive results for C. trachomatis. The sensitivity of SDA was superior to that of culture for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae with vaginal swab specimens and equivalent to that of the Roche PCR for the detection of C. trachomatis with cervical swab specimens. In the second phase of the study, 1,411 consecutively collected vaginal swab specimens were evaluated, with 357 (25.3%) specimens giving indeterminate readings on the basis of the result for the amplification control. The prevalences of sexually transmitted pathogens in vaginal swab specimens with and without use of the amplification control were 6.0 and 5.8%, respectively, for C. trachomatis and 3.1 and 3.0%, respectively, for N. gonorrhoeae. Although, vaginal swab specimens were equivalent to cervical swab specimens for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis by SDA with respect to sensitivity, one in four vaginal swab specimens yielded an indeterminate result when the amplification control was used. The amplification control has limited value for use with vaginal swab specimens.