Impact of age, health locus of control and psychological co-morbidity on patients' preferences for shared decision making in general practice

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore if patients' preferences to be involved in decision making correlates with reasons for encounter, psychological or demographic characteristics and with the physicians' estimation of the patients' preferred communication styles. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-four patients in general practice completed a questionnaire, which included the 'Autonomy Preference Index' (API), 'health locus of control' and 'hospital anxiety and depression'. The physicians documented the diagnoses and estimated the patients' preference for an autonomous, paternalistic or shared decision communication style. RESULTS: The preference for involvement varied across the reason for encounter (range 36.6-50.6), but this effect is explained by the patients' age (p<0.01). The participation preferences and the external and internal health locus of control declined with age whereas depression scores rose (p<0.01). The physicians estimation corresponded with patient API scores (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: It must be questioned if the preference for involvement is really a stable characteristic. The physicians were able to estimate the preferred communication style of their patients presumably on the basis of the patients' age and education. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It appears that not every situation in general practice requires SDM, though different communication styles could be useful if adapted to the individual situation.     

Physician facilitation of patient involvement in care: correspondence between patient and observer reports

The authors surveyed 128 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (1) to evaluate the congruence between patients' and observers' perceptions of physicians' facilitation of patients' involvement in care and (2) to identify which physician behaviors were most closely related to patients' perceptions that their doctors encouraged them to be involved in their care. The patients reported the degree to which they perceived that their physicians encouraged their involvement in the medical care process. Raters blind to the study hypotheses coded audiotapes of the physician-patient interactions. Pearson's r and simultaneous multiple regression used to address the study questions indicated a small to moderate, but statistically significant, association between patients' perceptions and observers' reports concerning the physicians' levels of facilitation. Open-ended questions, responding to patient questions, and offering fewer alternatives were all associated with the patients' positive reports of physician facilitation.     

University hospital physicians' attitudes and practices for smoking cessation counseling in Malatya, Turkey

The aim of the study is to determine attitudes and self-reported practices performance for smoking cessation counseling of the physicians working at a university hospital in Malatya, Turkey. All physicians who were providing health care to adult patients in 19 outpatient clinics at the hospital were administered a self-reported questionnaire. Of the physicians, 26.5% reported that they were always asking about their patients' smoking history and 22.6% were always advising their smoker patients to quit. Men non-smoker physicians more often practiced counseling than men smoker physicians. Negative attitudes of physicians about smoking cessation counseling negatively effected their practices. Negative attitudes were significantly higher among men smoker physicians than non-smokers but attitudes did not differ among female smoker and non-smoker physicians. The findings showed that smoking cessation counseling was rarely practiced by physicians and physicians' practices differed by their smoking behavior, departments and attitudes towards smoking cessation.     

An intervention to increase patients' trust in their physicians. Stanford Trust Study Physician Group.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of a one-day workshop in which physicians were taught trust-building behaviors on their patients' levels of trust and on outcomes of care. METHOD: In 1994, the study recruited 20 community-based family physicians and enrolled 412 consecutive adult patients from those physicians' practices. Ten of the physicians (the intervention group) were randomly assigned to receive a one-day training course in building and maintaining patients' trust. Outcomes were patients' trust in their physicians, patients' and physicians' satisfaction with the office visit, continuity in the patient-physician relationship, patients' adherence to their treatment plans, and the numbers of diagnostic tests and referrals. RESULTS: Physicians and patients in the intervention and control groups were similar in demographic and other data. There was no significant difference in any outcome. Although their overall ratings were not statistically significantly different, the patients of physicians in the intervention group reported more positive physician behaviors than did the patients of physicians in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The trust-building workshop had no measurable effect on patients' trust or on outcomes hypothesized to be related to trust.     

GP treatment decisions for patients with depression: an observational study

BACKGROUND: GPs are prescribing more antidepressants than previously, but not in accordance with guidelines. The reasons why they prescribe are not well understood. AIM: To explore associations between GP treatment and severity of depression, patients' life difficulties, previous history of illness and treatment, and patient attitudes. DESIGN: Observational study in two phases, 3 years apart. SETTING: Seven practices in Southampton, UK. METHOD: Adult attenders who consented were screened for depression in the waiting room. After the consultation, the 17 participating GPs completed questionnaires on the perceived presence and severity of depression, patients' life difficulties, previous problems and treatment, patient attitudes towards antidepressants, and their treatment decisions. Patients returned postal questionnaires on sociodemographics, life events, physical health, and attitudes towards antidepressants. RESULTS: Of 694 patients screened in the two phases, the GPs rated 101 (15%) as depressed, acknowledged depression in 44 cases (6%), and offered treatment in 27 (4%), including antidepressants in 14 (2%). Offers of antidepressants were more likely in both phases where the GPs rated the depression as moderate rather than mild, and where they perceived a positive patient attitude to antidepressants. However, GP ratings of severity did not agree well with the validated screening instrument, and their assessments of patients' attitudes to treatment were only moderately related to patients' self-reports. CONCLUSIONS: In line with current guidelines, GPs base prescribing decisions on the perceived severity of depression, taking patients' preferences into account, but they do not accurately identify which patients are likely to benefit from treatment. Better ways to assess depression severity and patient attitudes towards antidepressants are needed in order to target treatment more appropriately.     

Liking in the physician--patient relationship

Patients and physicians in established relationships (261 patients and their 44 physicians) were asked after a medical visit how much they liked each other and how much they felt liked, along with questions concerning patient health, physician and patient satisfaction, and the patient's affective state. Patients were re-contacted 1 year later and asked about their satisfaction with the same physician and whether they had considered changing physicians during the year. Patients' and physicians' ratings indicated mutuality of liking, as well as accuracy of estimating the other's liking for the self. The physician's liking for the patient was positively associated with the following variables: better patient health, more positive patient affective state after the visit, more favorable patient ratings of the physician's behavior, greater patient satisfaction with the visit, and greater physician satisfaction with the visit. The patient's liking for the physician was positively associated with better self-reported health, a more positive affective state after the visit, more favorable ratings of the physician's behavior, and greater visit satisfaction. Both the physician's liking for the patient and the patient's liking for the physician positively predicted the patient's satisfaction 1 year later and were associated with a lower likelihood that the patient considered changing physicians during the year. Female physicians reported liking their patients more than male physicians did, and patients' ratings of how much they felt liked corroborated this difference. Patients also reported liking female physicians more than male physicians. A number of these results remained significant even after controlling for the patient's overall satisfaction with the medical visit.     

Diabetes and its care--what do patients expect?

A sample of 77% of the non-insulin dependent diabetics aged 30-70 years from two urban practices offering no structured diabetic care were interviewed. The 55 patients (mean age 60 years) were asked about their experiences and expectations of diabetes and the health professionals involved in their care. Twenty-six patients attended the hospital diabetic clinic regularly but 13 patients received no review at all; 46 patients wanted their general practitioner to be involved in future care and only six wanted to continue with hospital review alone. Patients gave hospital doctors and general practitioners similar high ratings for knowledge of diabetes and its management but general practitioners and practice nurses were rated more highly for communication and accessibility. The aspect of care valued most was being given clear information about diabetic management. Twenty two patients thought that diabetes would have a significant impact on their future health and 35 rated regular diabetic review as extremely important in keeping themselves healthy. Most patients felt it likely that they would have a high blood glucose level most of the time and develop diabetic complications. Little difference was found between the views of clinic attenders and non-attenders, and there was no evidence that non-attenders had actively rejected review. These non-insulin dependent diabetics considered diabetes to be a serious disorder warranting regular care and expressed confidence in the primary care team's ability to provide such care.     

Influences on patients' ratings of physicians: Physicians demographics and personality

OBJECTIVE: There is considerable interest in the influences on patients' ratings of physicians. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, patients (n = 4616; age range: 18-65 years) rated their level of satisfaction with their primary care physicians (n = 96). Patients and physicians were recruited from primary care practices in the Rochester, NY metropolitan area. For analytic purposes, length of the patient-physician relationship was stratified (< or =1, 1-4, > or =5 years). Principal components factor analysis of items from the Health Care Climate Questionnaire, the Primary Care Assessment Survey and the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire yielded a single factor labeled "Satisfaction" that served as the sole dependent variable. Higher scores mean greater satisfaction. Predictors of interest were patient demographics and morbidity as well as physician demographics and personality, assessed with items from the NEO-FFI. RESULTS: Patients treated by a physician for 1 year or less rated male physicians higher than female physicians. This gender difference disappeared after 1 year, but two physician personality traits, Openness and Conscientiousness, were associated with patients' ratings in lengthier patient-physician relationships. Patients report being more satisfied with physicians who are relatively high in Openness and average in Conscientiousness. Older patients provide higher ratings than younger patients, and those with greater medical burden rated their physicians higher. CONCLUSION: Patients' ratings of physicians are multidetermined. Future research on patient satisfaction and the doctor-patient relationship would benefit from a consideration of physician personality. Identifying physician personality traits that facilitate or undermine communication, trust, patient-centeredness, and patient adherence to prescribed treatments is an important priority. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Learning environments could be created to reinforce certain traits and corresponding habits of mind that enhance patient satisfaction. Such a shift in the culture of medical education and practice could have implications for patient care.     

The relationship of residents' autonomy and use of a teaching hospital's resources

This 1990 study examines the relationship between the degree of use of patient care resources and the degree of supervision of residents by attending physicians (as perceived by residents) at a large midwestern teaching hospital. Ratings of the degree of clinical autonomy allowed residents by 65 attending physicians--each of whom had a general internal medicine practice with a significant hospital component--were provided by 23 former internal medicine chief residents and 17 internal medicine residents who were in their third year at the time of the study. A regression model was used to test the association between hospital resource use (as shown by total hospital charges to patients and their lengths of stay) and the residents' mean ratings of the degrees of autonomy the attending physicians permitted residents, for 7,169 of these physicians' patients discharged between 1986 and 1989 in 28 diagnosis-related groups. The analysis was controlled for patients' insurance status and chronic disease comorbidities. The patients whose attending physicians were rated as allowing substantial clinical autonomy had significantly lower total charges and lengths of stay (p less than .0001). These results suggest that internal medicine residents have an inherently conservative practice style that values low-intensity workups and rapid discharge of patients.     

三所精神病院间医护人员对精神疾病态度的比较

医护人员对精神疾病态度的研究国外开展的较多[1- 7] 。Ｋａｐｌａｎ等( 1) 认为医务人员的态度影响他们对待病人的方式 ;Ｒｅｉｓｓ( 2 ) 的研究表明精神科医护人员的态度受病人症状的影响。精神科医护人员对精神疾病的态度无疑会影响他们的服务态度及其医疗行为 ,有必要加以研究 ,然国内该方面研究较少。我们已发表的结果[8] 表明 ,医生对精神疾病和病人的态度与护士有所不同 ,且控制性别、年龄、文化程度等诸因素后医护人员的看法仍有所不同 ,提示这种差异与医护本身职业有关。这一论断与杨氏[9] 的“医生较之护士对精神病的态度更开朗和…     

Great expectations: factors influencing patient expectations and doctors recommendations at a Mood Disorders Unit

BACKGROUND: Literature about expectations and management of depression within community samples reflects attitudes of people who have generally not received treatment. We examined the factors influencing treatment expectations and psychiatrists' treatment recommendations for patients referred to a mood disorders unit with identified episodes of major depression. METHODS: Prior to attending a mood disorders unit, 182 men and women who met DSM-III-R or DSM-IV criteria for current major depression provided data on sociodemographic details, history of medical and psychiatric illness and expectations of treatment. Psychiatrists' treatment recommendations to the referring clinician were assessed to determine whether the patients' initial expectations were met. RESULTS: Data analyses revealed three factors relating to patients' expectations: "enhanced coping", "providing fresh ideas for the referring doctor" and "providing fresh ideas to self". Patients' expectations were influenced by sociodemographic and illness-related characteristics. In particular, young female patients typically expected to receive strategies to enhance coping, while those with lifetime anxiety expected less active involvement on their part. Some clinicians' recommendations were dependent upon depression type and patient factors. Women and those with a history of anxiety disorders received more education and recommendations for relationship counselling and support groups. LIMITATIONS: The study design did not allow determination of the impact of patients' expectations on the psychiatrists' recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Individual and illness characteristics are important predictors of treatment expectations prior to specialist care. It appears that doctors take these factors into account with implications for patients' satisfaction with the type of care recommended.     

Patient and physician factors predict patients' comprehension of health information

While patients frequently do not comprehend health information, little is known about patient and physician factors that influence lack of comprehension. To assess effectiveness of health information exchange, 19 physicians and 145 patients were given post-encounter questionnaires to evaluate the preceding visit. We analyzed differences in beliefs between patients who comprehended health information and patients who did not, and whether physicians' attitudes and self-assessment of their educational abilities influenced this comprehension. Patients with insufficient comprehension were more likely to have schooling below college and cited language as a barrier. Physicians who believed health information delivery to be important had fewer patients with comprehension difficulties, while physicians who assessed themselves as very effective educators had significantly more patients with lack of comprehension, compared with physicians who did not feel as effective. Patients' comprehension of health information was associated not only with patient factors but also with physicians' attitude and self-assessment.     

Physicians' attitudes and practices regarding complementary and alternative medicine

This article offers a review of the research literature on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and presents the findings from an exploratory survey of the beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors of conventionally trained physicians toward CAM. Earlier studies of CAM focused primarily on patients' attitudes and behaviors rather than those of physicians. Physicians play a crucial role in moderating patients' beliefs about and use of CAM treatments. Accordingly, this study focused on physicians' knowledge of medical efficacy and their impressions of CAM treatments. The findings from a survey mailed to a random sample of California physicians revealed that physicians' use or recommendations of CAM in their practices are limited by concerns about medical professional norms, yet are positively associated with their use of computer technology for self-education and communication with peers. Sixty-one percent of physicians do not feel sufficiently knowledgeable about CAM safety or efficacy, and 81% would like to receive more education on CAM modalities. The findings raise important issues for medical education and patient care.     

Patients' perspectives on sexual history taking in Korea

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to assess patients' beliefs and attitudes towards physicians taking their sexual history during routine medical visits in Korea, where Confucianism is the core societal value. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was administered to determine the patients' perspectives to sexual history taking, their actual experience of being asked about sexual issues by physicians, their belief in the importance of sexual history taking, their attitudes and cooperativeness towards each component of sexual history, and the effect of the physicians' age and gender on their comfort level during interview. RESULTS: 74.6% of respondents had never been asked about their sexual issues by physicians. Most patients showed a positive attitude and cooperativeness in general, although more than 25% had a negative attitude and were uncooperative with regards to certain components of sexual issues. Their comfort level to sexual history taking was not influenced by the physicians' age. However, female patients felt more comfortable discussing sexual issues with female physicians. CONCLUSION: Sexual history taking was often overlooked during routine medical visits in Korea, although patients showed a relatively positive and cooperative attitude. Women showed a greater preference for female physicians. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Sexual history taking should be more facilitated in clinical practice and requires a deliberate approach and skill.     

Medical students' involvement in outpatient clinical encounters: a survey of patients and their obstetricians-gynecologists.

PURPOSE: To study women's prior exposure to medical students during office visits, and the association between this and other factors in the likelihood of patients consenting to medical students' involvement in obstetrical-gynecological (ob-gyn) care. Physicians also were surveyed regarding their perceptions of patients' preferences. METHOD: In 1999-2000, an anonymous questionnaire was distributed for one week to all women scheduled for an ob-gyn visit and to their providers at six community campuses of Michigan State University College of Human Medicine. The questionnaire asked for patients' demographic information and prior experience with medical students, factors important when deciding to allow medical students to participate in their care, and how knowledge of medical students' involvement influences patients' choice of an ob-gyn. RESULTS: Seventy-two physicians and 1,059 patients returned the questionnaire. Four hundred eighty-eight (49%) patients reported prior experience with medical students. Patients and physicians rated interpersonal skills as most important when deciding about medical students' participation. Forty-three (63%) physicians thought students should participate in the history and physical examination compared to 299 (31%) patients. Prior experience with medical students was a major facilitating factor for medical students' involvement while patients' needs were a limiting factor. Patients' age and medical students' gender also predicted patients' attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Most women would allow medical students to participate in their care, a finding moderated by a number of factors. A small proportion of women were biased against participation of male medical students. Physicians overestimated patients' ratings and might themselves be a source of bias regarding medical students' involvement.     

Patients' and physicians' assessments of patients' health in rural Mississippi

A two-week health-appraisal survey of the patients of a rural Mississippi medical clinic during the month of January 1988 revealed that the larger percentage of the patients assessed their individual health status in about the same way that it was assessed by the clinic's staff physicians. The highest dissimilarity between physicians' and patients' assessments of patients' health occurred for the black patients in general and for the black men specifically. Findings of this study indicate a need for increased efforts in health education for rural communities, more research on how rural people assess their own health, and greater knowledge of rural people's health belief models.     

Extent of agreement between patient and physician ratings of emotional distress

The extent of agreement between subjects’ self-ratings on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL) and physicians’ ratings on three other scales for emotional distress was examined in two nonpsychiatric groups–women attending a family-planning service and persons participating in a community health survey. Agreement between patient and physician assessments of depression and anxiety was high, and the HSCL proved to be accurate in identifying symptomatic patients. The findings support the value of the HSCL as a screening instrument for the detection of anxiety and depression in nonpsychiatric medical patients.     

Collaboration between physicians and a hospital-based palliative care team in a general acute-care hospital in Japan

Background  

Continual collaboration between physicians and hospital-based palliative care teams represents a very important contributor to focusing on patients' symptoms and maintaining their quality of life during all stages of their illness. However, the traditionally late introduction of palliative care has caused misconceptions about hospital-based palliative care teams (PCTs) among patients and general physicians in Japan. The objective of this study is to identify the factors related to physicians' attitudes toward continual collaboration with hospital-based PCTs.