Reformatted visceral protocol helical computed tomographic scanning allows conventional radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine to be eliminated in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering high-energy injuries are at risk for occult thoracic and lumbar spine fractures, and the standard of care includes radiographic spine screening. Most such patients require computed tomographic (CT) scanning to screen for chest and/or abdominal visceral injury. Helical CT (HCT) scanning represents a major technologic change that allows data to be reformatted after the patient has left the radiology suite. We explored the possibility of using reformatted visceral protocol HCT scanning to replace radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine in the evaluation of seriously injured patients. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of consecutive patients with thoracic and lumbar spine fractures admitted over a 12-month period to an urban Level I trauma center was completed. The ability of conventional radiography and reformatted HCT scanning to detect spine fractures was compared. RESULTS: Of 1,915 trauma patients admitted, 78 (4.1%), with an average Injury Severity Score of 21.3 +/- 1.2, sustained one or more thoracic (n = 35 patients) or lumbar (n = 43 patients) spine fractures. The sensitivity of reformatted HCT scanning as a screening test for spine fractures was 97% for thoracic and 95% for lumbar spine fractures, compared with a sensitivity of 62% for thoracic and 86% for lumbar conventional radiographs. CONCLUSION: Data obtained from HCT scanning performed to evaluate seriously injured multiple trauma patients for thoracic and abdominal visceral injury can be reformatted to screen for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures, providing accurate screening while eliminating the time, expense, and radiation exposure associated with conventional film radiography.     

Analysis of chest radiographs of patients with thoracic trauma is not influenced by a grid nor by the experience of the reader

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interest of a grid and the experience of the interpreter to interpretate the chest radiographs (CRs) of patients with thoracic trauma, the reference is the helicoidal computed tomography (HCT). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. MATERIAL: CRs and HCT of 50 thorax trauma patients. METHOD: CRs were analysed without a grid (L) and results were compared with those obtained in an anterior study with a grid (G). The interpreter were residents in anaesthesiology (DESAR; G: n = 6/L: n = 4), residents in radiology (DESR; G: n = 3/L: n = 5), senior anaesthesiologists (MAR; G: n = 5/L: n = 4), and senior radiologists (MR; G: n = 3/L: n = 5). The reference was the HCT. The lectors were compared. RESULTS: The interpretation of the CRs was neither influenced by the experience and the specialty of the lector nor by the use of a grid. Perhaps the formation is sufficient for the anaesthesiologists to evaluate the essential lesions in the trauma patient and treat them.     

Interpretation of standard chest x-rays in thoracic trauma: influence of the experience of the interpreter]

OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of interpretation of chest radiographs (CRs) by physicians of different levels of experience, with reference to data obtained from helicoidal computed tomography (HCT). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. MATERIAL: CRs of 50 thorax trauma patients as recent to HCTs as possible obtained within the 48 h following admission to the intensive therapy unit. METHOD: CRs were analyzed according to a grid by observers included in one of the four groups: residents in anaesthesiology (n = 6), residents in radiology (n = 3), senior anaesthesiologists (n = 5), and senior radiologists (n = 3). The inter-observer agreements, the specificity and sensibility of each group with reference to HCT, and their global performances were assessed. RESULTS: Inter-observer agreements were poor and sensitivities low in comparison to specificities. No group of observers performed better than another one. These data substantiate the low sensitivity of CRs in comparison to HCT and show that the quality of interpretation of CRs of thorax trauma patients is not influenced by physicians' experience.     

A novel approach to improving the interpretation of CT brain in trauma

BackgroundComputed tomography of the brain (CTB) has a fundamental role in the diagnosis and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). There may be substantial discordance between initial CTB interpretation by emergency clinicians and the final radiology report. This study aimed to assess the utility of a structured reporting template in improving the accuracy of CTB interpretation by emergency clinicians.MethodA prospective pre- and post-intervention cohort study was undertaken using a study population of emergency medicine trainees. The CTB reporting template was created with consultation from radiology, emergency medicine and trauma specialists. Participants reported on a set of randomly selected trauma CTBs first without, and then with, the reporting template. Each case was independently assessed for concordance with the radiology report by two blinded assessors (including a radiologist) and the proportion of concordant reports in each phase calculated.ResultsThere were 26 participants recruited to the study who reported on a total of 320 CTBs. In the pre-intervention phase, 121 (76%) cases were concordant with the radiology report compared to 147 (92%) post-intervention (p < 0.01). The AUROC was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78–0.89) pre-intervention and improved to 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.99) with the intervention (p = 0.01). A higher level of baseline accuracy was observed in advanced trainees (78%) compared to basic trainees (72%), but both improved to a similar level of 92% with the use of the CTB reporting template. There was a marked reduction in false negative errors, with increased identification of critical diagnoses such as cerebral herniation and diffuse axonal injury.ConclusionThe use of the CTB reporting template significantly increased the accuracy of emergency medicine trainees and reduced the number of missed critical diagnoses. Reporting templates may represent an effective strategy to improve CTB interpretation and enhance the initial care of head injured patients.     

Senior surgical residents can accurately interpret trauma radiographs

Surgical residents routinely interpret radiographic studies during the evaluation of trauma patients, which directs further evaluation and invasive procedures. Official interpretations--"post-reading"--of radiographs by radiologists may be delayed by hours or even days. Trauma surgeons frequently act on their impressions before "official" readings are available. It has been demonstrated that surgical residents can accurately perform and interpret trauma ultrasound examinations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of senior surgery residents to interpret basic trauma radiographs. Interpretations of trauma radiographs (cervical spine, chest, pelvis, and CT of the brain) were recorded prospectively by the senior surgery resident present during trauma evaluations. These interpretations were compared with the findings of the radiologist as obtained from the official radiology report. Differing results were divided into clinically significant and clinically nonsignificant findings using defined criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were determined. Interpretations of trauma radiographs by senior residents achieved an accuracy of 100 per cent for cervical spine radiographs, 95.9 per cent for chest radiographs, 98.0 per cent for pelvis radiographs, and 97.9 per cent for CT of the head. In aggregate senior residents interpreted trauma radiographs with 97.9 per cent accuracy. Differences that were considered clinically significant according to preset criteria occurred in 2.1 per cent of observations. We conclude that senior general surgical residents can accurately interpret trauma radiology, including CT of the brain. These results suggest that institutional policies for post-reading of trauma radiology should be reassessed.     

Triage and mortality in 2875 consecutive trauma patients

Background: Most studies on trauma and trauma systems have been conducted in the United States. We aimed to describe the factors predicting mortality in European trauma patients, with focus on triage. Methods: We prospectively registered all trauma patients in Eastern Denmark over 12 consecutive months. We analysed the flow of trauma patients through the system, the time spent at different locations, and we assessed the risk factors of mortality. Results: We included 2875 trauma patients, of whom 158 (5.5%) died before arrival at the hospital. Most patients (75.3%) were brought to local hospitals and patients primarily (n=82) or secondarily triaged (n=203) to the level I trauma centre were the most severely injured. Secondarily transferred patients spent a median of 150 min in the local hospital before transfer to the level I trauma centre and 48 min on transportation. Severe injury with an injury severity score >15 was seen in 345 patients, of whom 118 stayed at the local hospital. They had a significantly higher mortality than 116 of those secondarily transferred [45/118, 38.1% vs. 11/116, 9.7% (P<0.0001)]. Mortality within 30 days was 4.3% in admitted patients, and significant risk factors of death were violence [odds ratio (OR)=5.72], unconsciousness (OR=4.87), hypotension (OR=4.96), injury severity score >15 (OR=27.42), and age. Conclusions: Around 50% of all trauma deaths occurred at the scene. Increased survival of severely injured patients may be achieved by early transfer to highly specialised care.     

Clinical predictors for the selective use of chest radiographs in pediatric blunt trauma evaluations

BACKGROUND: Chest radiographs continue to be a routine part of the evaluation of children sustaining blunt trauma. This study sought to determine those clinical markers associated with an abnormal chest radiograph in nonintubated, pediatric, blunt trauma victims. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed for severely injured pediatric trauma patients presenting to our emergency department between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 1997. Abnormal chest radiographs were identified through the trauma registry and four controls were matched to each case. Radiographs were reevaluated by our study radiologist. Variables associated with an abnormal chest radiograph were grouped to develop a set of clinical markers that could predict an abnormal chest radiograph with a high degree of sensitivity. RESULTS: An initial chest radiograph was obtained in 457 of 587 trauma patients. Thirty study patients with an abnormal radiograph that met inclusion criteria were analyzed with 133 controls. The presence of either an abnormal respiratory rate for age, chest tenderness, or back abrasions had a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.0) and a specificity of 0.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.47). CONCLUSION: In pediatric trauma patients, the presence of chest tenderness, back abrasions, or an abnormal respiratory rate identified all abnormal chest radiographs.     

Do initial radiographs agree with crash site mechanism of injury in pelvic ring disruptions? A pilot study

OBJECTIVE: Direction of injury force inferred from pelvic radiographs may be used in trauma care to predict associated injuries and guide intervention. Our objective was to compare injury direction determined from anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs with injury forces determined from crash site investigation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied all 28 subjects from the Crash Injury Research Engineering Network (CIREN) database who met inclusion criteria of pelvic ring disruption, single-event crash, restrained front-seat occupant, diagnostic-quality pelvic radiography, and complete crash investigation data. Assessment of diagnostic quality of pelvic radiography was made by 2 radiologists who were blinded to all other subject information. Crash site investigation data included principal direction of force (PDOF), crash magnitude, and passenger compartment intrusion. An orthopedic trauma surgeon and a fellowship-trained emergency radiologist independently assessed the pelvic radiographs to determine the injury PDOF and the Young-Burgess and Tile fracture classifications, with disputes resolved by an additional emergency radiologist. Agreement between injury forces and pelvic radiographs was assessed using the kappa statistic. RESULTS: The PDOF was anterior in 9 (32%) and lateral in 19 (68%) subjects. The readers agreed with the crash primary direction of force in 21 (75%) subjects (kappa=0.42). In subjects with lateral PDOF, agreement was 89% (17/19) compared to 44% for anterior PDOF (4/9). Interobserver agreement for the Young and Tile classification schemes was moderate (weighted kappa 0.44 and 0.54, respectively). CONCLUSION: Crash site investigation and pelvic radiography may provide conflicting information about primary direction of injuring forces. Presumed anterior impact based on PDOF is not in consistent agreement with the pattern of injury evident on the AP pelvic radiograph.     

Chest radiograph interpretation skills of anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE: To assess the skills of anesthesiologists in the interpretation of chest radiographs. DESIGN: Randomized evaluation conducted among anesthesiologists and radiologists. SETTING: Postgraduate Assembly of the New York State Society of Anesthesiologists in 1999, and the Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 61 anesthesiologists (48 attending physicians; 13 residents); control group of 8 radiology residents (all participants volunteered). INTERVENTIONS: After completing a demographic survey, participants were asked to review a series of 10 chest radiographs. A brief clinical scenario accompanied each radiograph. No time limit was set for these interpretations. Measurements and Main Results: The demographic characteristics of the anesthesiology participants included university faculty (46%), private group practitioners (41%), independent practitioners (11%), and 1 participant with an unspecified type of practice. Additional training among the participants included internal medicine (31%), surgery (19%), and pediatrics (3%); 34% did not specify any additional training. Of the participants, 92% were involved in cases requiring general anesthesia; 96% managed patients in the recovery room; and 34% managed patients in the intensive care unit. Of participants, 80% usually order chest radiographs, but only 42% interpret the films themselves. Misdiagnosed radiographs included pneumothorax by 11% of participants, free air under the diaphragm by 41%, bronchial perforation from a nasogastric tube by 28%, right mainstem intubation by 20%, superior vena cava perforation from a central venous catheter by 31%, normal film by 75%, negative pressure pulmonary edema by 16%, left lower lobe collapse by 80%, pulmonary infarction from a pulmonary artery catheter by 29%, and tension pneumothorax by 41%. Overall scores of the attending physicians were not significantly different from that of residents (p > 0.05). The control group of radiology residents scored significantly better (mean, 83.7; p = 0.009) than the anesthesia residents (mean, 62.8) and anesthesia attending physicians (mean, 62.5). CONCLUSION: Anesthesiologists are deficient in skills for the interpretation of chest radiographs. The skill level of university-based physicians is not greater than physicians in private practice, and skill level does not improve with level of training or experience. Most anesthesiologists rely on radiologists for interpretative results. Further training during the residency years may help improve diagnostic skills.     

Angiography and the pediatric trauma patient: a 10-year review

Background/Purpose

Although interventional radiology has played an increasing role in the management of adult trauma patients, little has been written regarding its application in the care of the injured child. This study analyzed the indications, results, and complications for angiography in pediatric trauma patients.

Methods

A retrospective review of pediatric patients (14 years or younger) admitted to Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (an urban level I trauma center), over a 10-year period (1993-2003) was performed. Patients who underwent angiography were identified using hospital angiography records, and further information was recorded from the trauma registry and medical records. Variables collected included age, sex, mechanism of injury, and injury severity score (ISS). Angiographic data analyzed included indications, results, therapeutic interventions, and procedure-related complications.

Results

Twenty-five pediatric trauma patients who underwent angiography were identified (18 boys, 7 girls). The average age was 11 years (range, 1-14 years), with an ISS of 16 ± 10. Indications for angiography included suspected limb ischemia (n = 9), suspected pelvic (n = 8) or solid organ bleeding (n = 8), suspected aortic injury (n = 6), and expanding hematoma (n = 1). Eleven patients (44%) had an abnormal finding, and 10 of 11 underwent a subsequent therapeutic intervention. There was 1 minor procedure-related complication and no procedure-related mortality.

Conclusions

Though used infrequently in pediatric trauma patients, the result of the angiography was abnormal in almost half of the children in this series. An abnormal finding prompted further therapeutic intervention in most cases. Angiography was associated with minimal morbidity and should be considered as a useful and safe adjunct when caring for injured children.     

Blunt renal trauma-blessing in disguise?

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to quantify pathologic lesions of the kidney found incidentally during the workup of a blunt renal trauma. Methods: A retrospective review of the medical records of 103 patients ages 0 to 18 years with blunt renal injuries admitted to a level 1 pediatric trauma center between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 1999 was performed. All patients underwent ultrasonography and Doppler of their renal vessels. Additional investigations with computed tomography (CT) scan, cystography, or nuclear medicine functional studies were performed as indicated. Results: Coexisting urogenital lesions were identified in 13 of 103 (12.6%) patients reviewed, and 7 (54%) required surgical treatment. The majority of the patients (9 of 13, 69%) suffered minimal trauma. All patients presented with gross hematuria as their main symptom. Stenosis of the uretero-pelvic junction was the most frequent diagnosis (n = 7): 3 patients required uretero-pyeloplasty, and 3 required nephrectomy. Two heterogeneous renal masses were discovered in which the diagnosis of a malignant process could not be eliminated; elective resection and open biopsy were performed. The diagnoses of multicystic kidney and solitary cyst with complex hematoma, respectively, were confirmed on pathology. Grade III ureterovesical reflux with pyelonephritis (n = 1), polycystic kidney (n = 1), extrarenal pelvis without obstruction (n = 1), and horseshoe kidney (n = 1) were the other lesions discovered. Conclusions: Pathologic lesions of the urinary tract are uncommon; however, they may complicate an otherwise negligible renal trauma. The diagnostic and therapeutic approach to blunt renal trauma must be modified in these cases. A high index of suspicion must be maintained when a patient presents with gross hematuria with a minimal force blunt abdominal trauma.     

Mechanism of injury does not predict acuity or level of service need: field triage criteria revisited

BACKGROUND: Trauma systems use specific criteria based on physiologic, anatomic, and mechanistic factors for field triage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the emergency department disposition of patients not meeting mandatory criteria (ie, physiologic or anatomic factors) for triage to a trauma center and the potential for over- or undertriage. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of trauma admissions from July 1999 to June 2001, to a level I trauma center. Triage criteria were classified as physiologic factors (n=300), anatomic factors (n=115), or mechanistic factors (n=414), according to the criteria of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Physiologic and anatomic factors were combined and compared with mechanistic factors. RESULTS: There were 1253 admissions during the study period. Sixty-six percent (n=830) met study inclusion criteria. Fifty percent (n=413) were admitted to the intensive care unit or operating room. Approximately 50% of each group (physiologic/anatomic, 52%; mechanistic, 47%; P=.08) were admitted directly to the operating room or to the intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Patients not meeting mandatory criteria for transfer to a trauma center often have serious injuries that require a higher level of care. The inclusion of all or select mechanistic criteria for evaluation at a trauma center is appropriate to achieve an acceptable rate of clinical undertriage, as well as resource undertriage and its subsequent complications.     

Evaluation of the lower spine after blunt trauma using abdominal computed tomographic scanning supplemented with lateral scanograms

BACKGROUND: Patients at risk for thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) and lumbar spine (LS) injury after blunt trauma are classically evaluated using conventional radiographs. Frequently, these patients also undergo abdominal and pelvic computed tomographic (CT) scanning to exclude the presence of associated intra-abdominal injuries. Standard abdominal and pelvic CT scan usually includes an anteroposterior (AP) scout film (scanogram) obtained before the cross-sectional imaging. The objective of this study was to determine whether a lateral CT scanogram and axial CT views would provide adequate imaging to allow for evaluation of the TLJ and LS and therefore eliminate the need for conventional screening computed lumbar spine radiographs (CLSRs). METHODS: Patients who sustained blunt injury and required both CLSRs as well as abdominal and pelvic CT scans were prospectively identified. The study protocol (CT + S) added lateral CT scanograms to all helical abdominal and pelvic CT scan studies. The AP and lateral CT scanograms were included with the axial images, and these views were reviewed together during final radiographic interpretation and diagnosis. The results of CT + S were compared with readings of the CLSRs (AP and lateral) in a blinded fashion by a trauma radiologist. RESULTS: Lateral scanograms were generated for 71 patients. All scanograms were technically adequate, with image quality equal or superior to computed plain radiographs. Ten patients were found to have 20 fractures, 19 acute and 1 chronic. All abnormalities identified by plain radiographs were seen using CT + S (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 100%). Eight transverse process and two spinous process fractures not seen on CLSRs were identified using CT + S. CONCLUSION: Our CT + S protocol (axial CT images plus AP and lateral scanograms) outperformed screening CLSRs in the detection of fractures of the lower spine (TLJ + LS) after blunt trauma. In addition, scanogram imaging is less dependent on body habitus and adds no additional cost or time to abdominal and pelvic CT scanning. Further study is required to determine whether CT + S can routinely replace conventional radiographs of the lower spine after blunt trauma.     

Prevalence and importance of pneumothoraces visualized on abdominal computed tomographic scan in children with blunt trauma

BACKGROUND: Chest radiographs are routinely obtained for the identification of pneumothoraces in trauma patients. Computed tomographic (CT) scanning has a higher sensitivity for the detection of pneumothoraces, but the prevalence and importance of pneumothoraces detectable by CT scan but not by chest radiography in children sustaining blunt trauma is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of children less than 16 years old with blunt trauma undergoing both abdominal CT scan and chest radiography in the emergency department of a Level I trauma center over a 28-month period. All abdominal CT scans were interpreted by a single faculty radiologist. The chest radiographs of all patients with pneumothoraces detected on CT scan as well as a random sample of chest radiographs from pediatric blunt trauma patients without pneumothoraces on abdominal CT scan (in a ratio of four normals per pneumothorax) were reviewed by a second faculty radiologist. Both radiologists were masked to all clinical data as well as to the objective of the study. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-eight children underwent both abdominal CT scan and chest radiography in the emergency department. Twenty patients (3.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-5.7%) were found to have pneumothoraces on CT scan. Of these 20 patients, 9 (45%; 95% CI, 23-68%) had pneumothoraces identified on initial chest radiography and 11 patients did not ("unsuspected pneumothoraces"). Twelve pneumothoraces were identified in these 11 patients; 6 were graded as minuscule and 6 as anterior according to a previously established scale. One patient with an unsuspected pneumothorax underwent tube thoracostomy. None of the 10 patients (0%; 95% CI, 0-26%) with unsuspected pneumothoraces who were managed without thoracostomy (including two patients who underwent positive pressure ventilation) had complications from their pneumothoraces. CONCLUSION: Less than half of pediatric blunt trauma patients with pneumothoraces visualized on abdominal CT scan had these pneumothoraces identified on initial chest radiograph. Patients with pneumothoraces identified solely on abdominal CT scan, however, uncommonly require tube thoracostomy.     

Consequences of delayed diagnoses in trauma patients: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: The approach to trauma care has improved in recent decades but delayed diagnoses still occur. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and consequences of delayed diagnoses in a single European trauma center. The effect of a systematic reexamination of the patient (tertiary survey) and reevaluation of x-rays and CT scans was evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively registered complications among all trauma patients admitted to our hospital from January 1, 1996, to January 1, 2000. All relevant trauma and patient-related data were added by the physician to a hospital-wide trauma database with client server architecture. Complications including delay in diagnosis were subsequently added to this database. Admitted trauma patients underwent a tertiary survey and all x-rays and CT scans were reevaluated within 24 hours after admission. RESULTS: A total of 3,879 patients were studied and 1,016 complications were registered. Of all complications 55 concerned delayed diagnoses detected in 49 patients (1.3%). In 28 of these patients (57.1%) the tertiary survey (20 of 49; 40.8%) and reevaluation of x-rays and CT scans (8 of 49; 16.3%) resulted in detection of delayed diagnoses within 24 hours. Detection of the remaining 21 delayed diagnoses occurred after more than 24 hours. Delayed diagnoses resulted in delayed treatment in 27 of the 49 patients (55.1%) and surgery was necessary in 12 patients (24.5%). None of the delayed diagnoses resulted in death. CONCLUSIONS: A prospective trauma and complication registration enables evaluation of the delays in diagnosis. In our study population more than half of the delayed diagnoses could be detected by a tertiary survey and reevaluation of x-rays and CT scans. Attempts to decrease the number of delayed diagnoses should prevent delays in treatment and improve the quality of trauma care.     

Value of cervical plain radiography in unconscious trauma patient

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of cervical spine standard radiographs, performed in emergency, and compared with entire cervical helical CT with multiplanar reconstructions as reference. STUDY DESIGN: Open prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a six months prospective study including all patients over 15 years of age and unconscious (Glasgow Coma Scale < or = 12). Each patient underwent standard radiographs as well as helical CT of the entire cervical spine. Three senior surgeons and one senior radiologist evaluated the standard radiographs quality. The interpretation was performed by 7 different groups of judges. Two radiologists interpreted the helical CT. For each group, the sensibility, the specificity and the count of correct diagnosis for the standard radiographs were evaluated. The results of the correct diagnosis of each group were then compared to determine the most performant group. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included. Helical CT diagnosed spine injuries in 11 patients. The quality of standard radiographs was poor with less than 10% judged correct and 90% of the C7-D1 junction not visible. In the best group (radiologist), the sensibility was 50%, the specificity was 85% and the count of correct diagnosis was 78%. For the correct diagnosis, senior radiologist was significantly better than anaesthetist students, radiologist students and emergency physicians. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic value of standard radiographs was weak whatever the physician. Therefore, helical CT of the entire cervical spine is absolutely necessary and must be performed during the initial evaluation, if the haemodynamic conditions are required.     

Time for a change in injury and trauma care delivery: a trauma death review analysis

Safety and error reduction in medical care is crucial to the future of medicine. This study evaluates trauma patients dying at a level 1 trauma centre to determine the adequacy of care. All trauma deaths at a level 1 trauma centre between 1996 and 2003 were reviewed by an eight-member multidisciplinary death review panel. Errors in care were classified according to their location, nature, impact, outcome and whether the deaths were avoidable or non-avoidable. Avoidable deaths were categorized as potentially, probably and definitely avoidable. Between 1996 and 2003, there were 17 157 trauma admissions, including 307 trauma deaths. The mean patient age was 47.7 years +/- 24.8 years, mean injury severity score 38.1 +/- 19.6. Of all deaths, 69 (22.5%) were deemed avoidable. Of the avoidable deaths, 61 (88%) were potentially avoidable, 7 (10%) probably avoidable and 1 (1.4%) definitely avoidable. Avoidable deaths were associated with patients with increased age, lower injury severity score, admissions to intensive care unit, longer hospital stay and treatment by a non-trauma surgeon (P < 0.05). Of the 307 trauma deaths, 271 (89.3%) patients experienced a total of 1063 errors, an overall error rate of 3.5 per patient. The error rate in the non-avoidable group was 2.9 per patient and 5.3 per patient in the avoidable group (P < 0.0001). Most errors occurred in the resuscitation area. Age, severity of injury, hospital length of stay and care by a non-trauma surgeon are factors associated with avoidable deaths. A new approach to trauma and injury care is required.     

Diagnostic modalities for the evaluation of pediatric back pain: a prospective study

The commonly taught premise that pediatric back pain frequently has an underlying diagnosis has been recently challenged. Previous studies have suggested that up to 84% of children with low back pain have associated serious diagnoses. Children with back pain, therefore, have frequently undergone exhaustive diagnostic testing. There have been few prospective studies, however, about the diagnosis rate and appropriate diagnostic methods for back pain in children. This study prospectively examines the rate of diagnosis for pediatric back pain and the value of various diagnostic studies for this problem. METHODS: All patients presenting to our institution with a chief complaint of back pain were evaluated for the study. Inclusion criteria consisted of age younger than 18 years, no previous back surgery, no previous diagnosis given, and duration of pain longer than 3 months. Seventy-three patients were enrolled in the study, and an algorithm was created for diagnostic evaluation. The algorithm incorporated commonly used diagnostic techniques including radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, bone scan, and laboratory studies. The end point was considered to be either (1) a definitive diagnosis or (2) no diagnosis and no symptomatic or clinical changes during a 2-year period. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (78.1%) ended with no diagnosis. Of the remaining 16, 9 were diagnosed with spondylolysis with or without spondylolisthesis. Three other patients had abnormal laboratory values but no definitive diagnosis. Other diagnoses included Scheuermann disease (n = 2), osteoid osteoma (n = 1), and a herniated disk (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation is the largest prospective study of diagnostic modalities in pediatric back pain to date. Contrary to most of the previously published data, most of our patients ended the study with no definitive diagnosis. In addition, the most of the diagnoses were made at initial physical examination or via initial plain radiographs. No diagnoses were missed using our algorithm. These results suggest that pediatric back pain frequently does not carry a definitive diagnosis and that exhaustive diagnostic protocols may not be necessary for this problem. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective study; Level 2 clinical evidence.     

Thoracic trauma: an analysis of 187 patients

A retrospective analysis of 187 cases of thoracic trauma seen between January 1, 1994 and June 30, 1999 is presented. The majority of the patients were male (male-female ratio 2.9:1) and the average age at admission was 41.1 years. Blunt trauma, especially motor vehicle accidents (72.2%) and falls (17.1%), were the most frequent causes of chest injury (95.8%). We used the injury severity score (ISS) to assess the severity of trauma. The average ISS for the total group was 27.8 (ranges: 4-75). In only 17.6% of the patients an isolated thoracic trauma was present. Rib fractures (n = 133), pulmonary contusion (n = 110), pneumothorax (n = 78) and haemothorax (n = 65) were the most frequent lesions. Most patients (97.9%) were admitted to the intensive care department. A minority of the patients required thoracotomy (n = 19, 10.2%). Main indications for thoracotomy were pulmonary laceration (n = 5), aortic rupture (n = 3) and rupture of the diaphragm (n = 3). For the majority of cases, observation and/or tube thoracostomy (52.4%) and/or mechanical ventilation (61.0%) were sufficient. Pneumonia and adult respiratory distress syndrome were the most common complications (38.0 and 7.0% respectively). The overall mortality rate was 16.6%. Main causes of death were intracranial hypertension, sepsis combined with multiple organ failure, and hypovolaemic shock. For patients who did not survive the average ISS was 40.3. In a survival analysis the ISS was found to be the most significant determining survival (p < 0.0001), followed by neurotrauma (p = 0.05). Mortality after thoracic trauma remains relatively high, especially in case of associated neurotrauma. The ISS is a valuable score for assessing the severity of trauma and predicting outcome.     

The natural history of flail chest injuries

Purpose: Flail chest (FC) injuries represent a significant burden on trauma services because of its high morbidity and mortality. Current gold standard conservative management strategies for FC, are now being challenged by renewed interest in surgical rib fixation. This retrospective epidemiological study sets out to evaluate FC patients, and quantify the natural history of this injury by studying the injury patterns, epidemiology and mortality of patients sustaining FC injuries admitted to a major trauma centre (MTC). Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis has been conducted at an MTC with full trauma service. All patients (age > 16 years) sustaining FC were included. Patient demographics, injury characteristics and inpatient stay information were extracted. Results: Two hundred and ninety-three patients were identified, with a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 28.9 (range 9-75), average age of 56.1 years (range of 16-100), and a male predominance (78%). Road traffic accidents accounted for 45% (n = 132) of injuries, whilst 44% were fall or jump from height (n = 129). Associated lung contusion was present in 133 patients (45%) while 76% of patients were found to have 5 or more ribs involved in the flail segment (n = 223) with 96% (n = 281) having a unilateral FC. Inpatient treatment was required 19.9 days (range 0e150 days) with 59% of patients (n = 173) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) level care for 8.4 days (range 1e63) with 61.8% requiring mechanical ventilation (n = 107) for 10.5 days (range 1-54), and 7.8% underwent rib fixation with rib plates (n = 23). The mortality rate was found to be 14% (n = 42). A non-significant trend towards improved outcomes in the conservative group was found when compared with the fixation group; ventilation days (6.94 vs 10.06, p = 0.18) intensive treatment unit (ITU) length of stay (LOS) (12.56 vs 15.53, p = 0.28) and hospital LOS (32.62 vs 35.24, p = 0.69). Conclusion: This study has successfully described the natural history of flail chest injuries, and has found a nonsignificant trend towards better outcomes with conservative management. With the cohort and management challenges now defined, work on outcome improvement can be targeted. In addition the comparability of results to other studies makes collaboration with other MTCs a realistic proposal.