Lateral Positioning With Differential Lung Ventilation and Unilateral PEEP Following Unilateral Acid Aspiration in the Dog

Body position can significantly alter the efficiency of gas exchange following unilateral lung injury. We systematically examined three positions during differential lung ventilation with unilateral positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) following unilateral hydrochloric acid aspiration in the dog. Twelve mongrel dogs were intubated with a double-lumen endobronchial tube and mechanically ventilated with a microcomputer-controlled pair of ventilators. A tidal volume of 7.5 ml/kg was delivered to each lung. The PaCO2 was maintained at 4.67 kPa. A unilateral injury was induced with an injection of 0.1 N hydrochloric acid (2.5 ml/kg) into one lumen of the endobronchial tube. 0.984 kPa PEEP was applied to the injured lung and the dogs were placed sequentially in one of three positions (supine, lateral decubitus with injured lung non-dependent, and lateral decubitus with injured lung dependent) for 1 h apiece. There was no significant difference between the three positions with regard to PaO2 (F (2, 10) = 1.60, P = 0.25) of venous admixture (F (2, 10) = 0.49, P = 0.63). Our data indicated that position did not alter oxygenation. This was probably due to the use of differential ventilation with unilateral PEEP which eliminated redistribution of ventilation between the two lungs and minimized position-dependent changes in pulmonary blood flow.     

Effect of Selective PEEP on Pulmonary Blood Flow following Unilateral Hydrochloric Acid Aspiration in the Dog

We investigated the effect of unilateral or bilateral positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on pulmonary perfusion in 12 dogs with a hydrochloric acid aspiration injury of the left lung. The lungs were ventilated separately and PEEP was applied to the left lung at 10 cmH2O (1.0 kPa) in six and at 15 cmH2O (1.5 kPa) in six others. Measurements of the right and left pulmonary arterial blood flows (QR and QL) and venous admixture were made before, during and after PEEP. After this study, 5 and 10 cmH2O (0.5 and 1.0 kPa) PEEP were applied to both lungs in six dogs and measurements were repeated. Following the application of PEEP to the left lung, a significant decrease in QL and increase in QR were observed. However, the application of PEEP to both lungs was followed by significant decreases in both QL and QR. The cardiac output decreased slightly during unilateral PEEP and markedly during bilateral PEEP. The venous admixture decreased significantly during PEEP in all the groups. These findings indicate that selective PEEP causes a transfer of pulmonary blood flow from the injured lung to the normal lung, improving ventilation-perfusion inequality, and improves gas exchange without impeding oxygen delivery.     

Fluctuating PEEP (F–PEEP) versus conventional PEEP in dogs with asymmetrical lung injury

Fluctuating PEEP (F-PEEP) is a newly developed PEEP in which end-expiratory pressure (EEP) is periodically changed within a certain range. In a dog model with unilateral lung injury induced by the introduction of hydrochloric acid, F-PEEP in which the EEP was periodically changed from 0.5 to 1.5 kPa at periods of 6 min, and conventional PEEP (C-PEEP) with an optimized EEP of 1.0 kPa, were each applied for 30 min. F-PEEP produced a significantly greater improvement of PaO2 and intrapulmonary shunt (QS/QT) than C-PEEP, and at the low EEP phase, the greatest improvement accompanied by an increased dynamic compliance and a large cardiac output was obtained. These results suggest that F-PEEP provides a useful mode of artificial ventilation for the treatment of unilateral lung injury.     

Fluctuating PEEP versus conventional PEEP in diffuse and unilateral lung injury induced by oleic acid

Effects of fluctuating positive end-expiratory pressure (F-PEEP), in which end-expiratory pressure (EEP) was periodically changed from 0.5 to 1.5 kPa with a periodic time of 6 min, and conventional PEEP (C-PEEP) with a fixed EEP of 1.0 kPa, were comparatively studied in diffuse (Group I) and unilaterally dominant lung injury (Group II). Although F-PEEP produced cyclic alterations of PaO2 in both groups, PaO2 changed in proportion to EEP in Group I and in reciprocal proportion to EEP in Group II. There was no significant difference between PaO2 and QS/QT during F-PEEP and those during C-PEEP in Group I, whereas in Group II, F-PEEP produced a significantly greater improvement of pulmonary oxygenation at the low EEP phase than C-PEEP. In both groups, the degree of hemodynamic depression was proportional to EEP. These results suggest that F-PEEP should be indicated for acute hypoxic respiratory failure with uneven distribution of lung injury.     

Development and Evaluation of a Flow-Dividing Unit for Differential Ventilation and Selective PEEP

Differential ventilation with selective positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was studied in a two-compartment lung model, using one ventilator and a flow-dividing unit consisting of inspiratory flow resistors and an inspiratory threshold valve. The compliance of each lung compartment was varied between 0.15 and 0.23 1 X kPa-1 and the resistance was varied from 0 to 3.5 kPa X 1(-1) X s. The minute volume was 12 1 and the respiratory frequency 12/min, with an inspiratory:expiratory ratio of 1:2. An even distribution of ventilation to the two lung compartments was obtained with the inspiratory flow resistors or the threshold valve under all conditions studied. However, a stepwise increase in the inspiratory resistance of one lung compartment from 1.0 to 2.5 or from 2.5 to 3.5 kPa X 1(-1) X s required readjustment of the inspiratory flow resistor to achieve an even distribution of ventilation, whereas the inspiratory threshold valve needed no readjustment. Large differences in the inspiratory impedance of the two lung compartments caused asynchronous gas delivery when the ventilation distribution was adjusted by means of the flow resistors. Use of the threshold valve resulted in synchronous gas delivery. The flow-dividing unit consists of non-active elements and can thus be connected to any ventilator.     

Lung and Chest Wall Mechanics during Differential Ventilation with Selective PEEP

Eight patients free from cardio-pulmonary disease and with a mean age of 46 years were studied during general anaesthesia in the lateral position. Measurements of hemithoracic mechanics were made during four different modes of ventilation: 1. Conventional ventilation (free distribution of ventilation) with no positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (CV), 2. differential ventilation (50% of ventilation to each lung) with no PEEP (DV:0), and 3 and 4. DV with selective PEEP of 0.8 and 1.6 kPa, respectively, to the dependent lung only (DV:8, DV:16). During CV, 60% of ventilation was distributed to the non-dependent lung. Non-dependent hemithoracic compliance was 64% greater and inspiratory resistance 39% lower than those of the dependent hemithorax. No significant differences between the two hemithoraces were noted during DV:0, but on application of selective PEEP the compliance of the dependent hemithorax increased and its resistance decreased. With DV:16, the compliances of the two hemithoraces were essentially equal, as were their resistances. Selective PEEP caused a larger volume increase in the dependent lung than general PEEP. Selective PEEP reduced the volume of the non-dependent lung but only by 1/3 of the simultaneous increase in that of the dependent lung. Oesophageal pressure increased only slightly on selective inflation of the dependent lung, and remained negative within the 21 volume range studied. It is suggested that the altered mechanics of the dependent lung during selective PEEP result in a more even distribution of the inspired gas within that lung.     

Differential Ventilation and Selective PEEP During Anaesthesia in the Lateral Decubitus Posture

The potential of differential ventilation (DV) with selective positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been tested versus conventional ventilation with and without general PEEP. Gas exchange and central haemodynamics were studied in 15 subjects with no clinical or radiological signs of pulmonary disease. The rationale of the method was to ensure ventilation of the well-perfused dependent lung and to counteract airway closure within that lung. The subjects were intubated with a double-lumen catheter prior to scheduled abdominal surgery. During general anaesthesia in the lateral posture, they were given DV. The mean inspired oxygen fraction was 0.32. Fifty per cent ("even" tidal volume (VT) distribution) or 70% ("inverted" VT distribution) of the inspired volume was administered to the dependent lung. Two synchronized ventilators were used. In eight subjects DV was also combined with PEEP applied solely to the dependent lung (selective PEEP). The major findings were that DV with even VT distribution reduced venous admixture by 26% ( P <0.05) and the alveolo-arterial oxygen tension gradient (P(A-a)o2) by 30% ( P <0.05) in comparison with conventional ventilation in the lateral position. The addition of selective PEEP further reduced the P(A-a)o2 by 13%. P(A-a)o2 was consequently 43% lower than during conventional ventilation without PEEP in the lateral posture ( P <0.01). Selective PEEP also had less impact on cardiac output than general PEEP (P<0.05). It is concluded that DV with even distribution of VT and selective PEEP can reduce the P(A-a)o2 in anaesthetized lung-healthy subjects in the lateral position.     

Effects of PEEP on extra vascular lung water and central blood volume in the dog

Twenty-four mongrel dogs were anaesthetized and ventilated mechanically in the supine position. Extravascular lung water (EVLW) and central blood volume (CBV) were measured with a double indicator (dye/cold) dilution technique. Both indicators were detected intravascularly in the aortic root with a fibreoptic thermistor catheter. Seven dogs ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 1.0 kPa (10 cmH2O) for a short period of time (less than 20 min) displayed no significant change in EVLW as measured with the indicator dilution technique (= EVLWi), while reductions were seen in both CBV (15%, P less than 0.01) and cardiac output (CO-thermodilution technique) (10%, P less than 0.05). Another seven dogs ventilated with a PEEP of 1.0 kPa for 8 h showed a gradual increase in EVLWi. After 8 h, a mean increase of 34% (P less than 0.01) was recorded, and the increase was also verified by post-mortem gravimetric determination of EVLW (= EVLWg), displaying an increase of 61% (P less than 0.01). In five dogs ventilated with zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) for 8 h, no changes in EVLWi, CO, and CBV were observed, and EVLWg was mean 4.39 g/kg body weight (BW). Five additional dogs were sacrificed after 15 min of anaesthesia without catheterization and EVLWg was found to be 4.24 g/kg BW. It is concluded that EVLWi does not change measurably during ZEEP or short periods of PEEP. However, long periods (8 h) of PEEP result in elevated EVLWi values. Gravimetry supports these conclusions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison between fluctuating PEEP and conventional PEEP in dogs with lung injury induced by blood aspiration

It has been documented that in some patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may produce no improvement or even a deterioration of pulmonary oxygenation due to an increase in ventilation-perfusion mismatching. Fluctuating PEEP (F-PEEP) is a newly developed PEEP in which end-expiratory pressure (EEP) is periodically changed within a certain range. In a dog model with localized lung injury induced by the aspiration of non-heparinized blood (2 ml.kg body weight-1), F-PEEP in which the EEP was periodically changed from 0.5 to 1.5 kPa at frequencies of 10 min, and conventional PEEP with 3 different fixed EEPs, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 kPa (C-PEEP0.5, C-PEEP1.0 and C-PEEP1.5) were each applied for 60 min. F-PEEP produced a periodical change in PaO2 and hemodynamic variables including cardiac output, and in comparison with C-PEEP0.5, C-PEEP1.0 and C-PEEP1.5, a significantly greater improvement of A-aDO2 and dynamic compliance with relatively large cardiac output in the low EEP phase. These results suggest that F-PEEP is a useful mode of artificial ventilation for treating some kinds of acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to increased ventilation-perfusion mismatching.     

Increased release of alpha-atrial natriuretic peptide during controlled mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure in humans

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that a release of alpha-artrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) is depressed resulting in the reduction of urinary output in patients receiving controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Five normovolemic patients with no apparent cardiac, renal, endocrine, or pulmonary dysfunctions were included in this study. After the patients were mechanically ventilated using a volumecycled ventilator with zero cmH₂O PEEP for one hour, hemodynamic variables were measured. Urine and blood samples were collected after the measurements. Plasma alpha-ANP levels were determined on blood samples taken from radial artery using specific radioimmunoassay. Then PEEP levels were changed to 5, 10, 15 and, finally, 0cmH₂O in four consecutive one-hour periods. At the end of each period, the measurements and collection of the samples were repeated. With increasing levels of PEEP, central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), and heart rate were pressure-dependently increased. On the other hand, cardiac output and urinary output were decreased. Plasma levels of alpha-ANP were also increased by the institution of PEEP. These changes occurred in a pressure-dependent fashion. Urinary sodium excretion, potassium excretion, fractional excretion of sodium and free water clearance remained unchanged. It is concluded that a release of alpha-ANP was augmented rather than depressed with PEEP. This suggests that a decrease in urinary excretion in patients with PEEP may not be due to a reduced release of alpha-ANP.(Sata T, Yoshitake J: Increased release of alpha-atrial natriuretic peptide during controlled mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure in humans. J Anesth 2: 119–123, 1988)     

Effect of PEEP and inhaled nitric oxide on pulmonary gas exchange during gaseous and partial liquid ventilation with small volumes of perfluorocarbon

BACKGROUND: Partial liquid ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and inhaled nitric oxide (NO) can improve ventilation/perfusion mismatch in acute lung injury (ALI). The aim of the present study was to compare gas exchange and hemodynamics in experimental ALI during gaseous and partial liquid ventilation at two different levels of PEEP, with and without the inhalation of nitric oxide. METHODS: Seven pigs (24+/-2 kg BW) were surfactant-depleted by repeated lung lavage with saline. Gas exchange and hemodynamic parameters were assessed in all animals during gaseous and subsequent partial liquid ventilation at two levels of PEEP (5 and 15 cmH2O) and intermittent inhalation of 10 ppm NO. RESULTS: Arterial oxygenation increased significantly with a simultaneous decrease in cardiac output when PEEP 15 cmH2O was applied during gaseous and partial liquid ventilation. All other hemodynamic parameters revealed no relevant changes. Inhalation of NO and instillation of perfluorocarbon had no additive effects on pulmonary gas exchange when compared to PEEP 15 cmH2O alone. CONCLUSION: In experimental lung injury, improvements in gas exchange are most distinct during mechanical ventilation with PEEP 15 cmH2O without significantly impairing hemodynamics. Partial liquid ventilation and inhaled NO did not cause an additive increase of PaO2.     

Selective PEEP in Acute Bilateral Lung Disease. Effect on Patients in the Lateral Posture

Seven patients with acute respiratory failure due to diffuse and fairly uniform lung disease were studied during mechanical ventilation in the lateral decubital position with: (a) zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) through a double-lumen oro-bronchial tube to permit a recording of the ventilation to each lung; (b) bilateral positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 1.2 kPa, with maintenance of ventilation distribution between lungs as observed during ZEEP; (c) selective PEEP of 1.2 kPa, applied to the dependent lung only, with ventilation as during ZEEP; and (d) conventional PEEP of 1.2 kPa applied to both lungs through a single-lumen tube, with free distribution of ventilation between the lungs. During ZEEP, 69% of ventilation was distributed to the non-dependent and 31% to the dependent lung; cardiac output was 6.51 X min-1, venous admixture (QS/QT) 40% and arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) 8.3 kPa. With bilateral PEEP, functional residual capacity (FRC) increased by 0.331, cardiac output was reduced to 5.11 X min-1 and venous admixture to 32%. PaO2 increased to 10.1 kPa. With selective PEEP the dependent lung FRC increased by 0.211 and the FRC of the non-dependent lung decreased by 0.081. Cardiac output increased to 6.11 X min-1, which was no longer significantly different from that during ZEEP. Venous admixture remained at the same level as with bilateral PEEP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of conventional volume controlled PEEP ventilation, pressure regulated volume controlled ventilation and low frequency positive pressure ventilation with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in pigs with acute ARDS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether any benefit of low frequency positive pressure ventilation with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (LFPPV–ECCO₂R) existed over either volume controlled ventilation (VCV) with measured best–PEEP or pressure regulated volume controlled ventilation (PRVCV) with an inspiration/expiration (I/E) ratio of 4:1, with respect to arterial oxygenation, lung mechanics and haemodynamics, in acute respiratory failure.
Fifteen adult pigs were used for the study. Respiratory failure was induced by surfactant depletion by repeated lung lavage. The different therapeutic approaches were applied randomly to each pig for 1 h. Measurements of gas exchange, airway pressures and haemodynamics were performed during ventilatory and haemodynamic steady state. Paco₂ was kept constant in all modes.
At almost similar total–PEEP, Pao₂ values were significantly higher with LFPPV–ECCO₂R comared to VCV with best–PEEP. Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and intrapulmonary pressure amplitude defined as the difference between PIP and total–PEEP were significantly lower with PRVCV and LFPPV–ECCO₂R compared to VCV with best–PEEP. There was no significant difference between the modes concerning cardiocircu–latory parameters.
PRVCV with I/E ratio of 4:1 and LFPPV–ECCO₂R proved to be better modes to achieve better gas exchange and lower PIP at lower intrapulmonary pressure amplitudes. It is concluded that PRVCV is an adequate form of treatment under these experimental conditions imitating acute respiratory failure, without necessitating other invasive measures.     

Ventilatory support in the intensive care unit

This article focuses on a classification of modes of mechanical ventilation, the indications for and complications of invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation and the recent evidence on adjuncts to mechanical ventilation.     

Ventilation by the Open Lung Concept in spite of traumatic lung herniation

Traumatic herniation of the lung is uncommon. We report a patientsuffering from multiple injuries including severe pulmonarycontusion and traumatic parasternal lung herniation, who developedacute respiratory distress syndrome. In spite of the lung herniation,we used mechanical ventilation according to the Open Lung Concept.Oxygenation improved rapidly, and early operative stabilizationwas possible. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 385–7     

Ventilatory support in the intensive care unit

This article focuses on a classification of modes of mechanical ventilation, the indications for and complications of invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation and adjuncts to mechanical ventilation.