aVR导联ST段及QRS波时限改变临床价值探讨

目的探讨非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)a VR导联ST(ST_(aVR))抬高及QRS波时限增宽对左主干或多支病变的预测价值。方法回顾性分析165例患者,与冠状动脉造影对比分析,探讨ST_(aVR)抬高(≥0.5mm)及QRS波宽度≥0.11s与左主干或多支病变的相关性。结果本组患者包括单支病变102例,左主干或多支病变63例。ST_(aVR)抬高及QRS时限增宽中,多支病变组发病率分别为82.54%、77.78%,单支病变组分别为17.65%、23.53%,两组间有统计学差异(p0.001)。ST_(aVR)抬高及QRS波增宽对于预测左主干或多支病变的敏感性、特异性及准确性均较高,分别为82.53%、77.78%,83.35%、76.47%,以及82.42%、76.97%。结论综合STa VR抬高及QRS波宽度的改变,有助于NSTE-ACS患者左主干或多支病变的初步诊断。     

心电图诊断左主干或多支血管病变

目的评价心电图对非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)的左主干及多支血管病变的预测价值。方法回顾分析拟诊NSTE-ACS,并行冠脉造影(CAG)检查患者219例,根据CAG结果分为两组,一组为左主干和/或多支病变组(LM/M-VD),另一组为对照组。对比两组得出预测LM/M-VD的敏感性和特异性较高的心电图指标。结果多变量分析表明≥5导联ST段下移(OR:3.29,p<0.05)和aVR导联ST段抬高(OR:3.52,p<0.05)能作为LM/M-VD病变的独立预测因子。QRS时限>90ms、aVR导联ST段抬高和≥5导联ST段下移的敏感性分别为73%、65%、66%,特异性49.58%、79.84%、78.15%。结论心电图对LM/M-VD的预测是可行的,aVR导联ST段抬高和≥5导联ST段下移是预测LM/M-VD良好的心电图指标。     

aVR导联ST抬高对急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死者左主干或三支血管病变的预测

目的研究急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTE-AMI)者aVR导联抬高幅度,与冠状动脉造影(CAG)对比,判断其对左主干/三支病变(LM/3VD)诊断的指导作用。方法对比106例aVR导联ST段抬高程度,结合CAG结果,研讨诊断LM/3VD的敏感性、特异性及相关性。结果 aVR导联ST段抬高是LM/3VD的独立预测因子(P<0.01),aVR导联ST段抬高≥0.5mm预测LM/3VD的敏感性及特异性分别为76%、86%。ST段抬高≥1.0mm预测LM/3VD的敏感性及特异性分别为43%、96%,ST段抬高≥1.5mm预测LM/3VD的敏感性及特异性分别为18%、99%。结论 aVR导联ST段抬高是NSTE-AMI者LM/3VD非常有用的预测因子,特异性好。     

心电图aVR导联变化对严重左主干狭窄病变的诊断意义

【】 目的 探讨冠状动脉左主干慢性严重狭窄病变的心电图特点。方法 单中心前展性连续选取典型心绞痛发作时12导联心电图aVR导联ST段抬高≥1mm,其他导联ST段压低或不抬高者作为研究对象,心绞痛缓解后aVR导联ST段抬高≥1mm恢复到等电位线。符合这一标准者共计76例住院急性冠脉综合症患者。依冠状动脉造影结果,分析左主干病变特点和其他冠状动脉病变特征。目测狭窄程度≥70%,为严重左主干狭窄病变。结果 单纯左主干严重狭窄54例(54/76, 71.1%),左主干病变 前降支近端近开口病变6例(6/76,7.9%);单纯左回旋支狭窄3例(3/76,3.9%); 其他复杂三支血管病变13例(13/76,17.1%)。冠状动脉正常者为零。左主干严重狭窄患者,aVR导联ST段抬高比非左主干患者更明显(0.25±0.10mV vs 0. 20±0.11mV, P<0.001); ST段压低导联多见于II III aVF和V3-V6导联,左主干严重狭窄患者,ST压低导联ST段压低程度比非左主干患者更明显(p<0.001)。这一特点诊断左主干严重狭窄的敏感性为72.7%, 假阳性54.4%,特异性45.4%,符合率61.9%。     

平板运动试验aVR导联ST段抬高对冠状动脉左主干病变的诊断价值

目的探讨平板运动试验aVR导联ST段抬高对冠状动脉左主干病变及前降支近段病变诊断价值。方法选取18例平板运动试验阳性并伴aVR导联ST段抬高者,2周内行冠状动脉造影(CAG),以冠状动脉内径狭窄≥50%者为CAG阳性。结果左主干病变13例,前降支近段病变3例,右冠状动脉中段狭窄1例,冠状动脉造影阴性1例。平板运动试验阳性并伴aVR导联ST段抬高对左主干病变的阳性预测值为72.22%(13/18);对冠状动脉左主干及前降支近段病变的预测值为88.89%(16/18)。结论平板运动试验阳性并aVR导联ST抬高≥0.1mv对诊断冠状动脉左主干及前降支近段病变有较高的阳性预测价值。     

aVR导联ST段抬高患者冠脉病变特点及预后评价

目的探讨心电图aVR导联ST段抬高对急性冠脉综合征患者远期预后的诊断价值。方法根据心电图有无aVR导联ST段抬高将878例急性冠脉综合征患者分为观察组和对照组。对比分析两组患者冠状动脉病变特点和一年内心血管事件发生率。结果对照组813例患者中,左主干病变10例、三支病变58例,一年内发生心血管事件21例。观察组65例患者中,左主干病60例、三支病变4例,一年内发生心血管事件9例。组间比较差异有统计学意义,p0.05。aVR导联ST段诊断左主干病变的敏感性为92.3%,特异性为98.8%,阳性预测值为85.7%。结论心电图aVR导联ST段抬高对急性冠脉综合征患者左主干病变有较好的诊断价值,并对患者心血管事件发生率具有较高的预测价值。     

QRS时间对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者左主干或三支病变的预测作用

目的测定非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合症患者的心电图QRS时间,通过与冠状动脉造影对比,判断其对左主干／三支病变诊断的指导作用。方法对比106例非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合症患者的体表心电图QRS时间,并与冠状动脉造影结果比较。结果QRS时间和左主干／三支病变具有相关性（OR=904,P〈0．01）,QRS时间／〉90ms预测左主干／三支病变的敏感性为88％,特异性为88％。结论QRS时间增宽可作为非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合症患者左主干／三支病变的预测因子。     

急性冠脉综合征三支病变患者心电图表现

目的研究急性冠脉综合征(ACS)三支病变患者心电图表现。方法241例冠状动脉(冠脉)造影明确的ACS分成非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)(n=173)与急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)(n=68)两种群体,比较各群体中三支病变与非三支病变患者心电图指标。结果NSTEMI-ACS三支病变与左主干病变患者多表现为V₄~V₆、Ⅰ、Ⅱ导联ST段压低伴随aVR导联ST段抬高的心电图模式。与STEMI非三支病变患者相比,STEMI三支病变患者Ⅰ、aVL、V₆导联ST段抬高数占比较多,且多有aVR导联T波直立与低电压表现;冠脉造影提示STEMI三支病变患者右冠及左回旋支狭窄程度更重。结论NSTEMI-ACS三支病变与左主干病变患者具有相对特定的心电图表现,STEMI三支病变患者心肌梗死部位广泛,易合并侧壁心肌梗死。     

aVR导联ST段回落对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者短期预后的评估价值

目的探讨aVR导联ST段抬高回落在非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征（NSTE-ACS）患者短期预后中的评估价值。方法纳入NSTE-ACS aVR导联抬高的患者45例;根据入院6h后aVR导联ST段是否回落分为ST段回落组（n=20）与非ST段回落组（n=25）;分析入选患者一般临床资料、心电图、冠状动脉造影结果,并对不良心脏事件的危险因素进行Logistic回归分析。结果 aVR导联ST段无回落组左主干＋三支血管病变率、30d内再发心肌梗死率、急诊PCI及冠脉旁路移植术比例均高于ST段回落组患者,具有统计学差异（P〈0.05）。Logistic回归分析显示,aVR导联ST段无回落是入院后30d内不良心脏事件（死亡、心肌梗死及行血运重建术）独立预测因子（OR=18.54,95%CI：3.57～96.1,P〈0.001）。结论 aVR导联ST段抬高无回落的NSTE-ACS患者其预后差于ST段抬高回落者,aVR导联ST段无回落是NSTE-ACS不良心血管事件的独立预测因子。     

aVR导联对不稳定型心绞痛冠脉病变的预测价值

目的通过与冠状动脉造影对比,研究aVR导联ST段改变的特征及对不稳定型心绞痛病变血管的判断价值。方法不稳定型心绞痛患者155例,其中单支病变83例、双支病变32例、3支病变27例、左主干病变13例,均于胸痛发作时记录心电图。结果胸痛时Ⅰ、Ⅱ、aVL、V3～V6导联ST段压低,aVR导联ST段抬高在3支和左主干病变组较显著。aVR导联ST段抬高诊断3支和左主干病变的敏感性(Se)、特异性(Sp)、符合率(CR)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)在两组分别为85.19%、84.62%、76.52%、76.52%、78.17%和77.34%、46.00%、28.95%、95.65%、97.78%。结论胸痛发作时心电图出现aVR导联ST段抬高和相对应导联ST段下降对判断3支或左主干病变有预测价值。     

ST segment elevation in lead aVR and coronary artery lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome

INTRODUCTION: Recently, the prognostic value of ST segment elevation in lead aVR in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and its relationship with significant stenosis of the left main coronary artery (LMCAS) and three-vessel disease have been highlighted. AIM: Analysis of the relationship between ST segment elevation observed in aVR lead and angiographic severity of coronary artery disease in patients with ACS. METHODS: The study involved 134 patients with ACS, including 54 subjects with ST elevation in aVR (group A) and 80 patients without elevation of ST in the same lead (group B), aged 33-78 years, mean 59.9+/-9.7 years. The severity of coronary artery disease was compared between the two groups. The logistic regression model was used for the analysis of factors affecting ST segment in aVR, as well as LMCAS and three-vessel disease probability. RESULTS: In patients with ST elevation in aVR, three-vessel disease prevalence was two times higher (61.1% vs 35.0%; p <0.01), and LMCAS - three times higher (55.6% vs 17.5%; p <0.000001) than in those without ST elevation in aVR. Factors independently associated with ST elevation in aVR were LMCAS (OR 6.1; 95% CI 2.62-14.23; p <0.00005), ST segment elevation in V1 (OR 3.03; 95% CI 1.34-6.86; p <0.01) and diabetes (OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.17-7.15; p <0.05). The predictors of LMCAS were three-vessel disease and ST elevation in aVR, while the predictors of three-vessel disease were: LMCAS, diabetes, male gender and history of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Elevation of the ST segment in aVR in the setting of acute coronary syndrome identifies patients with severe coronary artery disease. Only left main coronary artery disease, however, remains independently associated with ST segment elevation in aVR. Three-vessel disease and the left main coronary artery stenosis equivalent are not independent predictors of ST segment elevation in aVR of standard electrocardiograms recorded in patients with acute coronary syndrome.     

Acute myocardial infarction with significant left main coronary artery stenosis, significant 3-vessel coronary artery disease and elevated troponin-I at admission

Exercise-induced ST-segment elevation in lead aVR accompanied by ST-segment elevation in lead V1 might be a specific finding of left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis. Lead aVR and lead v1 ST segment elevation has been reported, during an attack of chest pain, in patients with LMCA disease with ST segment depression in leads V3, V4 and V5 (with maximal depression in V4). ST-segment elevation in lead aVR in patients with angina at rest can be related to transmural ischemia of the basal part of the interventricular septum, frequently due to LMCA or multivessel coronary disease too. 3-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) and LMCA disease show a frequent combination of leads with abnormal ST segments during chest pain with ST-segment depression in leads I II V4-V6, and ST-segment elevation in lead aVR. When ST-segment status in lead aVR combines with troponin T, ST-segment elevation in lead aVR and positive troponin T on admission are useful predictors of LMCA or 3-vessel CAD. We present a case of acute myocardial infarction with significant left main coronary artery stenosis, significant 3-vessel coronary artery disease and elevated troponin I at admission in an 83-year-old Italian woman. Also this case focuses attention on the importance of the recognition of the patterns suspected for LMCA and/or 3-vessel coronary disease.     

aVR ST段抬高对急性冠状动脉综合征患者罪犯病变的预测价值

目的 探讨aVR ST段抬高对非ST段抬高性急性冠状动脉综合征患者罪犯病变的预测价值.方法 选择因非ST段抬高性急性冠状动脉综合征入院的患者213例,根据aVR ST段分为抬高组和不抬高组,分析心电图与冠状动脉造影结果及冠状动脉病变范围及狭窄程度（以Gensini积分表示）的关系.结果 抬高组Gensini积分（58.16±43.85）高于不抬高组（23.53±26.80）,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.而ST段抬高的3个亚组（抬高＜0.10mV、0.10～0.15mV、＞0.15mV）Gensini积分差异均无统计学意义（均P ＞0.05）.aVR ST段抬高0.5mV以上对左主干病变的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为77.8%、59.5%、34.0%、90.9%;对三支病变分别为82.1%、67.1%、53.4%、89.1%;对左主干合并三支病变分别为88.5%、57.2%、22.3%、97.3%.结论 aVR ST段抬高者病变较重,但抬高幅度并不能预测狭窄程度.aVR ST段抬高是急性冠状动脉综合征左主干和（或）三支病变较强的预测因子.     

严重冠脉病变的心电图分析

目的分析左主干、前降支近端或三支病变冠心病心绞痛患者的心电图改变。方法13例冠脉造影诊断为左主干、前降支近端或三支病变的患者,对其静息时、心绞痛发作时心电图有无aVR、V1导联的ST段抬高及临床资料进行分析。结果胸痛发作时11例出现了aVR、V1导联典型改变,静息时2例aVR、V1导联改变。结论心电图aVR、V1导联ST段抬高,尤其STaVR〉STV1,V4～V6导联ST段下移,合并Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF导联或Ⅰ、Ⅱ导联ST段下移与冠脉左主干、前降支近端严重狭窄及三支病变有良好的相关性。     

Prediction of acute left main coronary artery obstruction by 12-lead electrocardiography. ST segment elevation in lead aVR with less ST segment elevation in lead V(1).

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the electrocardiographic (ECG) features associated with acute left main coronary artery (LMCA) obstruction. BACKGROUND: Prediction of LMCA obstruction is important with regard to selecting the appropriate treatment strategy, because acute LMCA obstruction usually causes severe hemodynamic deterioration, resulting in a less favorable prognosis. METHODS: We studied the admission 12-lead ECGs in 16 consecutive patients with acute LMCA obstruction (LMCA group), 46 patients with acute left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) obstruction (LAD group) and 24 patients with acute right coronary artery (RCA) obstruction (RCA group). RESULTS: Lead aVR ST segment elevation (>0.05 mV) occurred with a significantly higher incidence in the LMCA group (88% [14/16]) than in the LAD (43% [20/46]) or RCA (8% [2/24]) groups. Lead aVR ST segment elevation was significantly higher in the LMCA group (0.16 +/- 0.13 mV) than in the LAD group (0.04 +/- 0.10 mV). Lead V(1) ST segment elevation was lower in the LMCA group (0.00 +/- 0.21 mV) than in the LAD group (0.14 +/- 0.11 mV). The finding of lead aVR ST segment elevation greater than or equal to lead V(1) ST segment elevation distinguished the LMCA group from the LAD group, with 81% sensitivity, 80% specificity and 81% accuracy. A ST segment shift in lead aVR and the inferior leads distinguished the LMCA group from the RCA group. In acute LMCA obstruction, death occurred more frequently in patients with higher ST segment elevation in lead aVR than in those with less severe elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Lead aVR ST segment elevation with less ST segment elevation in lead V(1) is an important predictor of acute LMCA obstruction. In acute LMCA obstruction, lead aVR ST segment elevation also contributes to predicting a patient's clinical outcome.     

aVR 导联 ST 段抬高对冠脉左主干和／或3支血管病变的诊断价值

严重的冠脉病变包括冠脉左主干（left main coronary artery,LMCA）急性完全闭塞、次全闭塞以及3支血管病变（3-vessel disease,3-vd）。尽管 LMCA 急性完全闭塞患者能生存到达医院者很少,但 aVR 导联 ST 段抬高对其诊断的特异性和准确率均超过80％。对 LMCA 急性次全闭塞及3-vd 患者,aVR 导联 ST 段抬高的诊断价值高于心电图的任何其他单一或多个导联。aVR 导联 ST 段抬高幅度越大、持续时间越长,患者的病情就越重。本文对 aVR 导联 ST段抬高的诊断标准、电生理机制及国外研究进展进行综述。     

急性心肌梗死aVR导联ST段抬高的临床意义

目的 探讨体表心电图aVR导联ST段抬高对急性心肌梗死患者梗死相关血管(IRA)诊断及临床预后的意义.方法 收集2010年10月至2012年12月因急性心肌梗死入住我院的患者共240例,根据患者入院时心电图aVR导联ST段有无抬高,分为A组(AVR导联ST段抬高)80例和B组(aVR导联ST段无抬高)160例,对两组患者临床资料、冠状动脉造影结果及主要不良心血管事件进行对比.结果 ①两组患者性别、糖尿病病史、PCI病史等一般临床资料对比差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).②两组冠状动脉造影结果比较:IRA为左主干(LM),A组9例,B组3例,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01);IRA左主干和(或)三支血管(LM/3VD),A组46例,B组15例,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).③aVR导联ST抬高对IRA为左主干的敏感性及特异性分别为75％和69％,对IRA为左主干和(或)三支病变的敏感度及特异度分别为73％和81％.④住院期间主要不良心血管事件(MACE),A组36例,B组25例,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).⑤在住院期间,aVR导联ST段抬高(OR=10.03,95％CI=5.36～18.77,P＜0.01)是急性心肌梗死患者发生不良心血管事件的独立危险因素.结论 aVR导联ST段抬高提示急性心肌梗死患者梗死相关血管为左主干和(或)三支血管病变及住院期间不良心血管事件发生率增高.aVR导联ST段抬高对急性心肌梗死患者梗死相关血管判断及临床预后具有一定的临床指导意义.