Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Purpose

Patella resurfacing or nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of patellar resurfacing through an evaluation of the current literature.

Methods

We carried out a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing total knee arthroplasties performed with and without patellar resurfacing. Outcomes of reoperation, anterior knee pain and knee scores were analysed.

Results

Fourteen trials assessing 1,725 knees were eligible. The absolute risk of reoperation was reduced by 4 % (95 % confidence interval, 2–6 %) in the patellar resurfacing arm (between-study heterogeneity, P = 0.05, I² = 42 %), implying that one would have to resurface 25 patellae (95 % confidence interval, 17–50 patellae) in order to prevent one reoperation. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of anterior knee pain, knee pain score, Knee Society score and knee function score. But in the studies followed up for a mean time of not less than five years, a difference was found between the two arms in Knee Society scores (RR = 2.14, 95 % confidence interval, 0.76–3.52; P = 0.002).

Conclusions

The available evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing reduces the risk of reoperation after total knee arthroplasty. Patellar resurfacing patients may make a difference in long-term follow-up (five or more 5 years) of Knee Society scores. In other aspects, the benefit of patellar resurfacing is limited. Additionally, more carefully and scientifically designed randomised controlled trials are required to further prove the claim.     

Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Controversies existing over resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty remain in the literature. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE for published randomised clinical trials relevant to patellar resurfacing. The relative risk of reoperation was significantly lower for the patellar resurfacing group than for the nonresurfacing group (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38–0.84, P = 0.004). The overall incidence of postoperative anterior knee pain of the 1,421 knees included was 12.9% in the patellar resurfacing group and 24.1% in the nonresurfacing group. The existing evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing can reduce the risk of reoperation with no improvement in postoperative knee function or patient satisfaction over total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Whether it can decrease the incidence of anterior knee pain remains uncertain.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial

BACKGROUND: The management of the patella in total knee arthroplasty is still problematic. We aimed to identify differences in the clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty according to whether or not patellar resurfacing had been performed in a prospective, randomized study of 220 osteoarthritic knees. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty total knee arthroplasties in 201 patients were randomly assigned to be performed with either resurfacing or retention of the patella, and the results were followed for a mean of forty-eight months (range, thirty-six to seventy-nine months) in a double-blind (both patient and clinical evaluator blinded), prospective study. Evaluation was performed annually by an independent observer and consisted of assessment with the Knee Society clinical rating system, specific evaluation of anterior knee pain, a stair-climbing test, and radiographic examination. RESULTS: Fifteen (12%) of the 128 knees without patellar resurfacing and nine (10%) of the ninety-two knees with patellar resurfacing underwent a revision or another type of reoperation related to the patellofemoral articulation. This difference was not significant (chi square with one degree of freedom = 0.206, p = 0.650). At the time of the latest follow-up, there was a significantly higher incidence of anterior pain (chi square with one degree of freedom = 5.757, p = 0.016) in the knees that had not had patellar resurfacing. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent patellar resurfacing had superior clinical results in terms of anterior knee pain and stair descent. However, anterior knee pain still occurred in patients with patellar resurfacing, and nine (10%) of the ninety-two patients in that group underwent a revision or another type of reoperation involving the patellofemoral joint. Weight but not body mass index was associated with the development of anterior knee pain in the patients without patellar resurfacing, a finding that suggests that patellofemoral dysfunction may be a function of joint loading rather than obesity.     

Resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a critical appraisal of the available evidence

A systematic literature search for evidences comparing treatment effect and harm of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty was conducted and yielded five meta-analysis (MA), one systematic review (SR) and six randomized controlled trials not included in previous MAs/SR. The evidence suggests that patellar resurfacing would reduce the risk of anterior knee pain, as well as the risk of patella-related reoperation. Furthermore, patients not undergoing patella resurfacing would experience more knee pain during stair climbing and be less satisfied with surgery. No significant difference in range of motion can be expected with or without patellar resurfacing. Importantly, methodological limitations were observed in all retrieved studies and evidences about potential adverse events related to patellar resurfacing are presently undetermined.     

Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundThe management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the evidence regarding the use of patellar resurfacing in TKA.MethodsA meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare outcomes between knees receiving patellar resurfacing vs those not receiving resurfacing during primary TKA. Outcomes of interest were the Knee Society Scores, reoperation rates, anterior knee pain, patient satisfaction, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscores, and range of motion.ResultsTwenty RCTs met all eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. There were statistically significant differences favoring the resurfaced group in the knee component and functional component of Knee Society Scores that were not clinically significant. There was an increased risk of reoperation among knees that did not receive resurfacing with number needed to treat to prevent one case of reoperation of 25 knees (for reoperation for any reason) and 33 knees (for reoperation for anterior knee pain). There were no statistically significant differences in any other outcomes.ConclusionThe only clear relationship is that knees that do not receive patellar resurfacing are more likely to receive reoperation, most often for secondary resurfacing. However, the disease burden of differing complication profiles associated with resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups remains unclear. Continuing to collect data from large, well-designed RCTs would be beneficial in guiding management of the patella during TKA.     

膝关节骨关节炎患者初次全膝关节置换术中选择髌骨置换的Meta分析

目的探讨膝关节骨关节炎(OA)进行初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)中选择髌骨置换与否的疗效,评价两种不同治疗选择的差异。方法检索Medline、Embase、Cochranelibrary、CBM,收集膝关节OA行初次TKA术中髌骨置换与否的临床对照试验,提取数据分析,采用RevMan5.0.18进行Meta分析。结果纳入8个前瞻性随机对照试验,共822例手术,其中髌骨置换组373例,髌骨非置换组444例。髌骨置换与非置换组比较,前膝痛与KSS评分均无明显的统计学意义(P0.5),置换组的因髌股关节问题而再次手术率低于非置换组[RR=0.53,95%CI(0.29,0.96),P=0.04],但置换组再次手术的原因除了常见的前膝痛,还包括髌骨假体相关的并发症。结论膝关节OA的患者行初次TKA术中选择髌骨置换与否的前膝痛与KSS评分无明显的统计学意义,置换组的因髌股关节问题再次手术率低于非置换组,但置换组再次手术的复杂性大于非置换组。     

Isolated Resurfacing of the Previously Unresurfaced Patella Total Knee Arthroplasty

Postoperative anterior knee pain can be challenging after primary total knee arthroplasty. Isolated patellar resurfacing may provide symptomatic improvement in those patients with an unresurfaced patella. Seventeen isolated patellar resurfacing procedures were performed. Patient outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Society clinical and roentgenographic evaluation systems. Continued symptomatology and overall patient satisfaction were also analyzed. No revisions have been necessary at 47 months of follow-up. Overall, Knee Society knee scores and knee function scores significantly improved. Eight patients (53%) are asymptomatic and were satisfied with the procedure, whereas 7 patients (47%) continue to have anterior knee pain and are unsatisfied. Isolated patellar resurfacing for anterior knee pain in total knee arthroplasty with an unresurfaced patella has a low morbidity and revision rate but may not provide patients with predictable symptomatic improvement.     

The efficacy of patellar decompression for improving anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

Background

Anterior knee pain remains common following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of patellar decompression via drilling for the treatment of anterior knee pain following TKA without patellar resurfacing.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was performed in 271 consecutive patients who underwent primary total knee replacement with patellar decompression (study group, n = 131) or without decompression (control group, n = 140). The patients were assessed according to the Knee Society rating, clinical anterior knee pain score, and British Orthopaedic Association patient-satisfaction score in each group. Each assessment was performed without the examiner knowing whether the patella had been decompressed. Radiographic evaluations were also performed according to the Knee Society scoring system for functional activity and our own severity grade system for patellofemoral articular change.

Results

There were no adverse events following patellar decompression. The overall prevalence of anterior knee pain was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.71). However, patients presenting pain over grade II after the operation in the study group were statistically low (p = 0.01). The overall postoperative knee scores were higher in the study group, but there were no significant differences between groups (p = 0.0731). Analyses of the radiographs revealed similar postoperative outcomes in both groups of knees.

Conclusions

As we observed significantly lower rates of anterior knee pain and no patellar complications following patellar decompression via drilling in TKA without patellar resurfacing, we recommend performing patellar decompression in cases of total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this technique through an evaluation of the current literature. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing total knee arthroplasties performed with and without patellar resurfacing. Outcomes of interest included the number of reoperations, the prevalence of postoperative anterior knee pain, and the improvement in various knee scores. RESULTS: Ten trials assessing 1223 knees were eligible. The absolute risk of reoperation was reduced by 4.6% (95% confidence interval, 1.9% to 7.3%) in the patellar resurfacing arm (between-study heterogeneity, p < 0.01; I(2) = 60%), implying that one would have to resurface twenty-two patellae (95% confidence interval, fourteen to fifty-two patellae) in order to prevent one reoperation. Patellar resurfacing reduced the absolute risk of postoperative anterior knee pain by 13.8% (95% confidence interval, 6.4% to 21.2%), implying that one would have to resurface seven patellae (95% confidence interval, five to sixteen patellae) in order to prevent one case of postoperative anterior knee pain. Only four trials provided adequate data for a quantitative synthesis of the changes in the various knee scores; on the basis of those four trials, there was no difference in the mean improvement in the knee scores (standardized mean difference, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, -0.50 to 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing reduces the risks of reoperation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. The observed effects are clinically important despite their modest magnitude. Additional, carefully designed randomized trials are required to strengthen this claim.     

A Meta-Analysis of Patellar Replacement in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Background

This meta-analysis (MA) aims at comparing the clinical outcomes of resurfacing and nonresurfacing the patella in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Secondary resurfacing of the patella after primary total knee arthroplasty does the anterior knee pain resolve?

Although it has been shown that the risk of anterior knee pain is greater in patients with nonresurfaced patellae, it is not exactly clear whether the pain would resolve with secondary resurfacing of the patella. Thirty-nine patients (41 knees) underwent secondary patellar resurfacing between January 2001 and January 2007. The mean age was 66 years. The mean body mass index was 29.2 kg/m². The average time from primary total knee arthroplasty to resurfacing procedure was 29 months. The mean follow-up was 54 months. Anterior knee pain was the indication for secondary resurfacing in all patients. Although the clinical and functional knee scores improved significantly for whole cohort, 8 patients (8 knees) were dissatisfied with the outcome of surgery. This study highlights that secondary resurfacing is not an always rewarding procedure and patients need to be consulted appropriately with regard to the outcome.     

Do Changes in Patellofemoral Joint Offset Lead to Adverse Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty With Patellar Resurfacing? A Radiographic Review

Background

Patellofemoral joint biomechanics contribute to anterior knee pain, instability, and dysfunction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Information about specific factors leading to anterior knee pain and dysfunction is currently limited. Changes in patellofemoral joint offset (PFO) refers to a mismatch between the preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior geometry of the patellofemoral joint. It remains unclear whether these changes lead to adverse outcomes in TKA.

髌骨软骨破坏程度对保留髌骨的全膝关节置换术疗效的影响

目的 探讨髌骨软骨破坏程度对保留髌骨的全膝关节置换术疗效的影响.方法 2002年1月至2006年5月行全膝关节置换术163例244膝,根据术中观察到的髌骨软骨破坏程度将患者分为轻度、中度、重度软骨破坏三组.所有手术均不置换髌骨.术后随访88例133膝,轻度组42膝,中度组43膝,重度组48膝.采用美国膝关节学会评分(Knee Society Score,KSS)系统(包括膝评分和膝功能评分)和膝前痛评分系统对三组疗效进行评估.结果 随访48～102个月,平均72个月.KSS膝评分和膝功能评分从术前(35.1±5.4)分和(19.2±9.8)分分别提高到(91.7±5.6)分和(83.7±17.5)分.三组KSS膝评分从术前(34.7±6.2)分、(36.5±5.2)分、(35.3±6.2)分分别提高至(92.6±4.5)分、(90.5±6.7)分、(91.9±5.9)分;膝功能评分从术前(14.2±8.6)分、(16.5±7.4)分、(17.0±7.5)分分别提高至(86.6±12.6)分、(82.0±17.2)分、(82.8±21.1)分.三组术后膝评分和膝功能评分的差异均无统计学意义.术后膝前痛的发生率为11.3%(15/133),轻度、中度、重度软骨破坏组分别为11.9%(5/42)、11.6%(5/43)、10.4%(5/48),差异无统计学意义.结论 全膝关节置换术后疗效及膝前痛的发生率与术前髌骨软骨破坏程度无关,髌骨软骨破坏程度不是全膝关节置换术中置换髌骨的可靠依据.

Abstract：

Objective To determine whether there was any correlation between the degree of degenerative changes in the patellar cartilage and the clinical outcome after TKA without patellar resurfacing.Methods A clinical study was performed on 133 knees of 88 patients that underwent TKA without patellar resurfacing from January 2002 to May 2006. According to the degenerative condition of the patellar cartilage,patients was classified as mild group, moderate group, and severe group. Pre- and post-operative evaluations were performed using the knee and function scores of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSS) and Anterior Knee Pain Rating. Results The duration of follow-up was 72 months (range 48-102). The overall knee score of KSS in all patients were improved from 35.1±5.4 preoperatively to 91.7±5.6 postoperatively,and function score of KSS from 19.2±9.8 preoperatively to 83.7±17.5 postoperatively. The mean knee scores of KSS were improved from 34.7±6.2, 36.5±5.2 and 35.3±6.2 preoperatively to 92.6±4.5, 90.5±6.7 and 91.9±5.9 in mild, moderate, and severe group postoperatively, respectively. The mean function scores of KSS were improved from 14.2±8.6, 16.5±7.4 and 17.0±7.5 postoperatively to 86.6±12.6, 82.0±17.2 and 82.8±21.1 in mild, moderate, and severe group postoperatively, respectively. There was no difference among all groups with regard to the postoperative knee scores and function scores of KSS. The prevalence of anterior knee pain was 11.3% in all, and 11.9% in mild group, 11.6% in moderate group and 10.4% in severe group. There was no difference among all groups with regard to the anterior knee pain. Conclusion The clinical outcome and anterior knee pain after TKA without patellar resurfacing was not correlated with the severity of degenerative changes in the patellar cartilage. The degree of degenerative condition of the patellar cartilage is not indication for patellar resurfacing.     

International Rates of Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty, 2004-2014

Background

Patella resurfacing is performed in >80% of primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in the United States, yet far fewer patellae are resurfaced internationally. Recent registry data have begun to question the long-held belief that patellar resurfacing yields lower revision rates. Multiple current meta-analyses have not shown a difference in patient satisfaction, anterior knee pain, or knee society scores based on patellar resurfacing.

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up

BACKGROUND: Whether to resurface the patella during a primary total knee arthroplasty performed for the treatment of degenerative osteoarthritis remains a controversial issue. Parameters that have been suggested as being useful in guiding this decision include patient height and weight, the presence of anterior knee pain preoperatively, and the grade of chondromalacia encountered intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these parameters were predictive of the clinical result following total knee arthroplasty with or without patellar resurfacing. METHODS: Eighty-six patients (118 knees) undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. All patients received the same posterior-cruciate-sparing total knee prosthetic components. Patients were randomized to treatment with or without resurfacing of the patella. Evaluations consisted of the determination of a Knee Society clinical score, the completion of a patient satisfaction questionnaire, specific questions relating to patellofemoral symptoms, and radiographs. Sixty-seven patients (ninety-three knees) were followed for a minimum of five years (range, sixty to eighty-four months; average, 70.5 months). RESULTS: With the numbers available, there was no significant difference between the groups treated with and without resurfacing with regard to the overall Knee Society score or the pain and function subscores. Obesity, the degree of patellar chondromalacia, and the presence of preoperative anterior knee pain did not predict postoperative clinical scores or the presence of postoperative anterior knee pain. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of anterior knee pain could not be predicted with any clinical or radiographic parameter studied. On the basis of these results, it seems likely that postoperative anterior knee pain is related either to the component design or to the details of the surgical technique, such as component rotation, rather than to whether or not the patella is resurfaced.     

Patellar Denervation Reduces Postoperative Anterior Knee Pain After Patellar Resurfacing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundThe benefit of patellar denervation (PD) in patellar resurfacing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debatable. This prospective, randomized controlled trial investigated whether circumferential PD should be performed in patellar resurfacing TKA.MethodsA total of 241 patients who underwent unilateral TKA were randomized into PD or non-PD groups. Incidence, intensity, and presentation time of anterior knee pain (AKP) and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.ResultsThe incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the PD group (6.4% vs 16.2%, P = .032). The intensity of AKP and patient satisfaction scores were significantly better in the PD group at 3 months but not after 3 months. The presentation time of AKP mostly occurs at 3 months after surgery. The Knee Society score, range of motion, Oxford score, patellar score, activity of daily living score, and visual analog scale of overall knee pain were not significantly different between the two groups during the follow-up period.ConclusionGiven that PD can improve AKP and patient satisfaction at an early period postoperatively without jeopardizing clinical outcomes at no additional cost, this inexpensive procedure readily available in nearly every operation room is strongly recommended during primary TKA with patellar resurfacing.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective,randomized study

BACKGROUND: Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty is a common complaint and typically is attributed to the patellofemoral joint. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcome of resurfacing and nonresurfacing of the patella, particularly with regard to anterior knee pain, and to clarify the indications for patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized study of 514 consecutive primary press-fit condylar total knee replacements. The patients were randomized to either resurfacing or retention of the patella. They were also randomized to either a cruciate-substituting or a cruciate-retaining prosthesis as part of a separate trial. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.3 years (range, two to 8.5 years), and the patients were assessed with use of the Knee Society rating, a clinical anterior knee pain score, and the British Orthopaedic Association patient-satisfaction score. The assessment was performed without the examiner knowing whether the patella had been resurfaced. At the time of follow-up, there were 474 knees. Thirty-five patients who had a bilateral knee replacement underwent resurfacing on one side only. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of anterior knee pain was 25.1% (fifty-eight of 231 knees) in the nonresurfacing group, compared with 5.3% (thirteen of 243 knees) in the resurfacing group (p < 0.0001). There was one case of component loosening. Ten of eleven patients who underwent secondary resurfacing had complete relief of anterior knee pain. The overall postoperative knee scores were lower in the nonresurfacing group, and the difference was significant among patients with osteoarthritis (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups with regard to the postoperative function score. Patients who had a bilateral knee replacement were more likely to prefer the resurfaced side. CONCLUSIONS: As the present study showed a significantly higher rate of anterior knee pain following arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing, we recommend patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee replacement when technically possible.     

Patella in total knee arthroplasty: to resurface or not to��a cohort study of staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty

The aim of this study was to assess medium term results of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty, specifically looking at anterior knee pain, patellofemoral function and need for reoperation. A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients undergoing staged bilateral knee arthroplasty with the patella being resurfaced only on one side. This was due to change in the clinical practice of the senior author. Sixty patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically on a regular basis. The surgery was either performed or supervised by the senior author in all cases. All patients received the cemented press-fit condylar© prosthesis. The Knee Society clinical rating system was used. Scores were recorded pre-operatively and post-operatively at three months, one year, two years and three yearly thereafter. The mean age of patients in the study group was 75 years (range: 62–89 years). There were 42 women and 18 men in the study. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.5 years (range: 2–12 years). There was no significant difference in the pre-operative scores in both groups. There were significantly better scores (p < 0.05) on the resurfaced side as compared to the non-resurfaced side at final follow-up. No revision was carried out for patellofemoral complications on the resurfaced side. Four patients required revision in the form of patellar resurfacing on the non-resurfaced side for persistent anterior knee pain. Patellar resurfacing is recommended in total knee arthroplasty for better functional outcome with regards to anterior knee pain and patellofemoral function.     

Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate this technique through an analysis of comparative studies in the current literature.

Anterior knee pain in rheumatoid patients after total knee replacement. Possible selection criteria for patellar resurfacing.

Postoperative anterior knee pain was evaluated in a consecutive series of 138 knees in 108 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by total knee replacement with Mark I Insall-Burstein prostheses. No knee had primary patellar resurfacing, and in the 119 knees followed up for a mean of 63.9 months, none had secondary resurfacing. Anterior knee pain was absent in 87 knees (73%), mild in 16 (13.5%) and moderate or severe in 16 (13.5%). The height of the patella above the prosthetic joint line was the only variable which was directly related to the incidence of anterior knee pain. The sensitivity and specificity of patellar height measurements for identifying patients with or without pain were derived. From these data, a selective policy of resurfacing the patella in those at risk was adopted. Choosing a patellar height of 15 mm or less, patellar resurfacing could be avoided in 80% of patients likely to have no pain, and the patella could be resurfaced in 65% of those likely to have anterior knee pain.