Cancer incidence in patients on chronic dialysis and in renal transplant recipients

A markedly increased incidence of cancer in renal transplant recipients is now recognized; to determine if immunosuppression alone may be responsible for this increase in risk, cancer incidence was compared in 709 renal transplant recipients and 317 dialysis patients. Malignancy developed in 19 transplant recipients (2.7%) and in 33 patients on chronic dialysis (10.4%). In our report an excess of skin cancer was observed in the transplant series while tumors of the urinary tract were seen more frequently in patients on dialysis. Transplantation and consecutive immunosuppression does not appear to constitute an additional cancer risk for the uremic patient who is faced with the alternative to undergo chronic dialysis or renal transplantation.     

Renal transplantation for end-stage polycystic kidney disease

From 1963 to 1984, 56 renal transplants were performed in 51 patients with end-stage renal failure due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). There were 49 cadaver and 7 living-related transplants. Overall patient and graft survival was 88 per cent and 66 per cent at one year, 59 per cent and 49 per cent at five years, respectively. There was no significant difference in patient or graft outcome with cadaver versus living-related donor kidneys. One-year graft success with and without pretransplant bilateral nephrectomy (BN) was 78 per cent versus 58 per cent, respectively (n.s.). Patient survival after return to dialysis after graft loss was not compromised by the earlier performance of BN. In patients who did not undergo pretransplant BN, there were no complications from the retained native kidneys after transplantation. In cadaver recipients, the two-year graft success rate with and without preliminary blood transfusions was 54 per cent versus 61 per cent, respectively (n.s.). Cadaver graft survival with and without adjunctive antilymphocyte globulin (ALG), excluding 3 recipients managed with cyclosporine, was 88 per cent versus 50 per cent at one year, and 70 per cent versus 32 per cent at five years, respectively (p less than 0.05). This beneficial effect of ALG was still evident when only transfused cadaver recipients were analyzed and was achieved with no resulting compromise in patient survival. Follow-up computerized tomography (CT) scanning of the transplant kidney in 10 recipients with a long-term (1-9 years) functioning allograft showed no evidence of recurrent ADKPKD.     

The effect of cyclosporine on mortality and renal function in living related pediatric kidney transplant recipients

The outcome, incidence of acute rejection episodes, complications and cyclosporine (CyA) induced nephrotoxicity were studied in 10 pediatric kidney transplant recipients who were grafted from one-haplotype indentical parent with immunosuppression of CyA and prednisolone (Pred). Excellent patient and graft survival could be achieved in this population with low incidences of acute rejection or serious complications as when compared with the results of azathioprine (AZ) treated pediatric patients. With a mean follow-up of 12.9 months (range 1 to 50 months), the patient survival rate was 100 per cent and the graft survival rate was 100, 84, 84 and 84 per cent at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years post transplantation, respectively. Serum creatinine levels in the group were 0.97, 1.17, 1.14 and 1.2 mg/dl at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post transplantation, respectively. The incidence of treated acute rejection episodes was 20 per cent (2 out of 10) in the CyA-treated children, whereas it was 53 per cent (9 of 17) in the Az-treated children. Five children who had undergone transplant surgery before they were 11 years old displayed linear growth in height after their transplantation. There have been no opportunistic infections, aseptic necrosis or peptic ulcers in this group and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity has not been a serious problem in the pediatric recipients. Only 10 per cent (1 out of 10) of the recipients displayed acute nephrotoxicity and only one recipient has converted from CyA+Pred to CyA+AZ+Pred (Three drug therapy) due to persistent nephrotoxicity. Cyclosporine and prednisolone have therefore constituted a relatively safe, effective immunosuppressive regimen for pediatric renal allograft recipients. This paper was presented at the 7th international congress of pediatric nephrology.     

Prevention of sepsis during the transition to dialysis may improve the survival of transplant failure patients

Dialysis patients are at risk for sepsis, and the risk may be even higher among transplant failure patients because of previous or ongoing immunosuppression. The incidence and the consequences of sepsis as defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification hospital discharge diagnoses codes were determined among 5117 patients who initiated dialysis after transplant failure between 1995 and 2004 in the United States. The overall sepsis rate was 11.8 per 100 patient years (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.5 to 12.1). Sepsis was highest in the first 6 mo after transplant failure (35.6 per 100 patient years [95% CI 29.4 to 43.0] between 0 to 3 mo after transplant failure; 19.7 per 100 patient years [95% CI 17.2 to 22.5] between 3 to 6 mo after transplant failure). In comparison, the sepsis rate among incident dialysis patients between 3 and 6 mo after dialysis initiation was 7.8 per 100 patient years (95% CI 7.3 to 8.3), whereas the sepsis rate among transplant recipients between 3 and 6 mo after transplantation was 5.4 per 100 patient years (95% CI 4.9 to 5.9). Patients who were > or =60 yr, obese patients, patients with diabetes, and patients with a history or peripheral vascular disease or congestive heart failure were at risk for sepsis. Transplant nephrectomy was not associated with septicemia. The role of continued immunosuppression and vascular access creation was not assessed and should be addressed in future studies. In a multivariate analysis, patients who were hospitalized for sepsis had an increased risk for death (hazard ratio 2.93; 95% CI 2.64 to 3.24; P < 0.001). Strategies to prevent sepsis during the transition from transplantation to dialysis may improve the survival of patients with allograft failure.     

Bladder Cancer in Renal Allograft Recipients: Risk Factors and Outcomes

BackgroundSolid organ transplant recipients have an increased cancer risk owing to immunosuppression and oncogenic viral infections. We report on the incidence and types of bladder cancer in kidney transplant recipients in Ireland, describing possible additional risk factors and outcomes in these patients.MethodsWe identified kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with de novo bladder cancer between January 1, 1994, and July 31, 2012, by integrating data from the Irish National Cancer Registry and National Renal Transplant Registry. We calculated the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and examined patient and tumor characteristics and 1-year survival rate.ResultsFifteen patients were diagnosed with de novo bladder cancer during the study period, representing 0.48% of kidney transplant recipients. The SIR was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.4–4.2; P < .001). The mean interval between transplantation and diagnosis of bladder tumor was 8.6 years and mean age at time of diagnosis was 55.7 years. Sixty percent of patients were male. The tumor types were transitional cell carcinoma (9 patients), squamous cell carcinoma (3 patients), adenocarcinoma (1 patient), carcinoma in situ (1 patient), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (1 patient). Beside immunosuppression, risk factors associated with bladder cancer were urogenital disease (6 patients), cyclophosphamide exposure (2 patients), BK nephropathy (1 patient), analgesic nephropathy (1 patient), and extensive smoking (1 patient). Eight patients underwent radical cystectomy for invasive tumors, with resection of other pelvic organs in 7 patients. Mortality rate within the first year was 40%.ConclusionBladder cancer occurred more commonly in kidney transplant recipients with a predominance of aggressive tumors and a high mortality. In patients with preexisting risk factors such as urologic abnormalities and cyclophosphamide exposure careful assessment before transplantation and vigilant monitoring posttransplantation with a low threshold for cystoscopy may improve outcomes.     

A ten year experience with cadaver kidney preservation using cryoprecipitated plasma.

Between August 1967 and January 1977, 699 cadaver kidneys were preserved and transplanted in our hospital after continuous perfusion with cryoprecipitated plasma. Overall graft survival of primary transplants was 55 +/- 2 per cent at one year and 41 +/- 2 per cent at four years. The results with ninety-six second transplants were similar. The number of HLA antigens shared and the duration of preservation did not influence graft survival. Patient survival among 426 cadaver graft recipients since September 1972, when lower dose immunosuppression was started, was 91 +/- 1 per cent at one year and 84 +/- 2 per cent at four years, significantly better than survival before then. Survival of fifty-two recipients of cadaver retransplants since September 1972 was 86 +/- 5 per cent at one year and 86 +/- 5 per cent at four years, which was better than before. The incidence of posttransplantation dialysis was 30 per cent and did not correlate with the length of preservation. Primary wound infections, primary ureteral extravasation, and vascular complications each occurred with an incidence of 1.1 per cent or less in patients treated with lower dose immunosuppression. Only four kidneys were lost because of complications, and in no instance was the need for transplant nephrectomy directly related to the method of preservation. Perfusion preservation with cryoprecipitated plasma gives excellent results compared with alternative methods.     

Survival improvement among patients with end-stage renal disease: trends over time for transplant recipients and wait-listed patients

Both transplant and dialysis outcomes have improved over recent years. In addition, transplantation has been shown to confer a survival benefit over maintenance dialysis. The study presented here addresses the question of whether the survival benefit of transplantation over maintenance dialysis has changed in the most recent eras. This study was based on data collected by the United States Renal Transplant Scientific Registry and the United States Renal Data System. The study sample consisted of 104,000 patients placed on the renal transplant waiting list between 1988 and 1996, of which 73,707 subsequently received renal transplants. The annualized adjusted mortality rates per 1000 patient-years were calculated by calendar year of placement on the renal transplant waiting list and for kidney transplant recipients. The resulting data were plotted, and linear curve fitting was used to estimate the slope of the change of the adjusted mortality rates by year during the period studied, 1988 to 1996. Overall annual adjusted death rates in the wait-listed patients and transplant recipients per 1000 patient-years decreased for both groups throughout the study period. From 1989 to 1996, the relative risk (RR) for patient death had decreased by 30% for transplant recipients and 23% for wait-listed patients (RR = 0.70 and 0.77; P < 0.0001 each). Slope analysis of the cause-specific mortality rates for cardiovascular disease and infection showed nearly equivalent, linear decreases for both groups. Mortality rates have improved overall and by categories of major cause of death for both renal transplant recipients and patients on the renal transplant waiting list. These favorable trends most likely represent equal advances in transplantation, dialysis, and general medical care.     

Effect of early transplant function as an index of recipient presensitization on long-term function of machine-preserved cadaveric kidneys

The early post-transplantation function of machine-preserved cadaveric kidneys judged to be of good quality from perfusion data appeared to provide a good in vivo clinical index of recipient presensitization to donor transplant antigens. The quality of early function was affected adversely by prolonged pretransplantation hemodialysis, by multiple transplants (second and third), and by the identified presence of antibody-against-the-panel (AbAP) values of 10 per cent or more. The highest pretransplantation AbAP per cent and the per cent nearest the time of transplantation also were factors in the quality of early transplant function (F, F^AR, SF, or NF class early transplant function).The level or “titer” of recipient presensitization appeared to have an effect on long-term transplant survival and the level of function of these kidneys. Long-term (one year) function of cadaveric kidneys in nonsensitized recipients or those with a low titer of sensitization (F class) was 51 per cent. That for recipients with intermediate titers of sensitization (F^AR and SF classes) was 29 per cent and 61 per cent, respectively. Long-term transplant survival for recipients with a presumed high titer of presensitization (NF class) was 40 per cent. The long-term survival of SF class kidneys at risk to the immune response was 79 per cent. That for F^AR and NF class kidneys that recovered function after the initial presumed immunologic assault was 89 and 88 per cent, respectively.Long-term transplant function in “nonsensitized” recipients (F class) was not influenced significantly by the number of HL-A antigens mismatched donor-to-recipient (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4). The long-term transplant survival in a small group (eight patients) of nonsensitized (F class) recipients subjected to splenectomy because of anemia and leukopenia prior to transplantation was 88 per cent, and that for “nonsensitized” (F class) recipients not undergoing splenectomy at the same transplantation center was 44 per cent.     

Renal transplantation in diabetic patients: the end result does justify the means

There were 49 insulin-dependent diabetics who received 52 renal allografts: 13 from living related and 39 from cadaveric donors. The mean age and time on dialysis were similar for both recipient groups. Patient survival at 1 and 2 years was 100 per cent for living related donor recipients, and 76 and 56 per cent at 1 and 2 years for cadaveric recipients. Renal allograft survival was 92 and 85 per cent at 1 and 2 years for living related donor recipients. Cadaveric allograft survival was 49 and 41 per cent at 1 and 2 years. The cumulative mortality rate was 39 per cent and the over-all surgical morbidity was low. Renal transplantation in diabetic patients is worthwhile from the standpoint of patient and allograft survival.     

Malaysian Dialysis and Transplant Registry Report

SUMMARY: This report summarizes data for dialysis and transplant patients up to the end of 1995. We estimate coverage to be about 30% of dialysis patients and near complete ascertainment of transplant patients. On the 31 December 1995, there were 2224 patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT), comprising 50% on haemodialysis (HD), 12% on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 38% with functioning transplants. the prevalence rate for dialysis was 68 per million population (p.m.p.) and that of transplant 42 p.m.p. the new dialysis acceptance rate was 15 p.m.p. and transplant 5 p.m.p. Forty-seven per cent of new patients had unknown primary renal disease and 30% was due to non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Mean age of prevalent HD patients was 42 years, CAPD 46 years and 34 years for transplant. Patient survival on CAPD was 85% at 1 year and for HD was 88%. One year transplant patient survival was 94% and graft survival 91%.     

Malaysian Dialysis and Transplant Registry Report

This report summarizes data for dialysis and transplant patients up to the end of 1995. We estimate coverage to be about 30% of dialysis patients and near complete ascertainment of transplant patients. On the 31 December 1995, there were 2224 patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT), comprising 50% on haemodialysis (HD), 12% on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 38% with functioning transplants. The prevalence rate for dialysis was 68 per million population (p.m.p.) and that of transplant 42 p.m.p. The new dialysis acceptance rate was 15 p.m.p. and transplant 5 p.m.p. Forty-seven per cent of new patients had unknown primary renal disease and 30% was due to non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Mean age of prevalent HD patients was 42 years, CAPD 46 years and 34 years for transplant. Patient survival on CAPD was 85% at 1 year and for HD was 88%. One year transplant patient survival was 94% and graft survival 91%.     

Colorectal complications of end‐stage renal failure and renal transplantation: a review

Aim End‐stage renal failure (ESRF) and renal transplant recipients are thought to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal complications. Method A review of the literature was performed to assess the prevalence and outcome in both benign and malignant colorectal disease. Results No prospective randomized studies assessing colorectal complications in ESRF or renal transplant were identified. Case series and case reports have described the incidence and management of benign colorectal complications. Complications included diverticulitis, infective colitis, colonic bleeding and colonic perforation. There was insufficient evidence to associate diverticular disease with adult polycystic kidney disease. Three population‐based studies have shown up to a twofold increased incidence of colonic cancer but not rectal cancer for renal transplant recipients. Bowel cancer screening (as per the general population) by faecal occult blood testing appears justified for renal transplant patients; however, evidence suggests that consideration of starting screening at a younger age may be worthwhile because of an increased risk of developing colonic cancer. Two population‐based studies have shown a threefold and 10‐fold increased incidence of anal cancer for renal transplant recipients. A single case–control study demonstrated significant increased prevalence of anal human papillomavirus (HPV) and intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) in patients with established renal transplants. Conclusions Despite the lack of high‐level evidence, ESRF and renal transplantation were associated with colorectal complications that could result in major morbidity and mortality. Bowel cancer screening in this patient group appears justified. The effectiveness of screening for HPV, AIN and anal cancer in renal transplant recipients remains unclear.     

Early failure of kidney transplants in the current era—a national cohort study

Although short‐term outcome after kidney transplantation has improved, a small proportion of grafts are lost during the first year. We characterize in detail all early graft losses in the current era in a nationwide cohort of kidney transplant recipients. Altogether 2447 kidney transplantations, performed between June 2004 and October 2016, were included. All graft losses (return to dialysis or patient death) occurring during the first post‐transplant year were characterized. During the first post‐tranplant year, altogether 109 grafts were lost, 67 grafts failed, and 42 patients died. Fifty‐five per cent of the deaths were due to cardiovascular causes, and 29% due to infectious causes. Twenty‐one per cent of the failed grafts were primary nonfunction of unknown reason, 34% were lost due to venous thrombosis and 9% due to arterial thrombosis, but only 10 (15%) patients lost a graft due to acute cellular or humoral rejection. Independent risk factors for death included diabetes, and longer duration of pretransplant dialysis treatment, whereas risk factors for graft failure included increased level of panel‐reactive antibodies and increased cold ischaemia time. Kidney allografts are rarely lost due to immunological reasons during the first post‐transplant year. The most common causes of early death after transplantation are cardiovascular and infectious causes.     

Screening for Prostate, Breast and Colorectal Cancer in Renal Transplant Recipients

American Society of Transplantation guidelines recommend screening renal transplant recipients for breast, colorectal and prostate cancer. However there is a lack of evidence to support this practice. Computer simulation modeling was used to estimate the years of life lost as a result of these cancers in 50-year-old renal transplant recipients and subjects in the general population. Renal transplant recipients lost fewer years of life to cancer than people in the general population largely because of reduced life expectancy. In nondiabetic transplant recipients, loss of life as a result of these cancers was comparable with that in the general population only under assumptions of increased cancer incidence and cancer-specific mortality risks. Even with two-fold higher cancer incidence and disease-specific mortality risks, diabetic transplant recipients lost considerably fewer life years to cancer than those in the general population. Recommended cancer screening for the general population may not yield the expected benefits in the average renal transplant recipient but the benefits will be considerably higher than for patients on dialysis. Transplanted patients at above-average cancer risk in good health may achieve the benefits of screening that are seen in the general population.     

Decreased survival in liver transplant patients requiring chronic dialysis: a Canadian experience

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is associated with increased mortality among nonrenal organ transplant recipients. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a serious complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). It is unclear if the outcomes of these individuals are different from nontransplant patients requiring dialysis or a kidney transplant. METHODS: We report the incidence of ESRD in OLT recipients and compare their outcomes to matched dialysis controls. We analyzed 4186 patients who received an OLT in Canada between January 1981 and December 2002 and 228 matched, nontransplant, chronic dialysis controls. RESULTS: The incidence of ESRD after OLT was 2.9% (n=120). The unadjusted mortality rate for those who required chronic dialysis was 49.2% compared with 26.8% in those who did not develop kidney failure (P<0.0001). The survival of OLT recipients on dialysis was lower than the matched chronic dialysis cohort (log-rank test, P=0.01). A kidney transplant was performed in 24% of the OLT recipients and 21% of the matched dialysis cohort, and their overall survival was similar. The OLT patients who remained on dialysis had a significantly lower survival when compared with matched dialysis patients who did not receive a kidney transplant (log-rank test, P=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality was greater for OLT recipients on dialysis than would be expected from a matched, nontransplant, dialysis cohort. Kidney transplantation may abrogate some of this increased mortality risk.     

Cardiac surgery after renal transplantation

Renal transplantation remains a mainstay of therapy for end-stage renal disease. Cardiac disease has a high prevalence in this patient population. This study reviews the factors and outcomes associated with cardiac surgery in renal transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective review of all patients at our institution with a functioning renal allograft at the time of their cardiac surgical procedure. Between June 1971 and April 2000, 2343 patients underwent renal transplantation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Twenty-six patients with a functioning renal allograft subsequently underwent a cardiac procedure requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. There were 11 women and 15 men. Twenty-four patients underwent coronary bypass, one had a double valve replacement, and one had a combined coronary bypass/valve replacement. The interval from renal transplant to heart surgery ranged between 0.6 and 227 months (mean 79.1). Operative mortality was zero but there were two hospital deaths: one due to multisystem organ failure and one due to pulmonary embolism. Six additional patients died late with only one due to heart disease. Four patients required perioperative dialysis, and one of these went on to require permanent dialysis. Two additional patients returned to dialysis late postoperatively. The requirement for acute perioperative dialysis was predicted by preoperative creatinine, hematocrit, and intraoperative urine output. The overall survival is 69 per cent (18 of 26) with a median follow-up of 38 months. The majority of long-term survivors have minimal cardiac symptoms. Standard cardiac surgery procedures can be performed with relative safety in patients with functioning renal allografts. The incidence of perioperative and late development of renal failure requiring dialysis is low. The long-term survival and symptomatic improvement achieved are favorable and warrant continued performance of cardiac surgery in patients with functioning renal allografts.     

Risk of Thyroid Cancer Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients have an elevated incidence of thyroid cancer. We evaluated a wide range of potential risk factors in a cohort of 229 300 U.S. solid organ transplant recipients linked with 15 stage/regional cancer registries (1987–2012). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, transplanted organ, year of transplantation, and time since transplantation. Hazard ratios (HRs) for death and/or graft failure were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, transplanted organ, and year of transplantation. After transplantation, 356 thyroid cancers were diagnosed. Thyroid cancer incidence was 2.50‐fold higher in transplant recipients than the general population (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25–2.77). Among recipients of different organs, kidney recipients had the highest incidence of thyroid cancer (IRR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.03–1.53). Elevated thyroid cancer incidence was associated with cholestatic liver disease/cirrhosis as an indication for liver transplantation (IRR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.09–2.63), hypertensive nephrosclerosis as an indication for kidney transplantation (IRR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.03–1.94), and longer prior dialysis among kidney recipients (5+ vs. <1 year, IRR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.32–2.80; p‐trend <0.01). Posttransplantation diagnosis of thyroid cancer was associated with modestly increased risk of death (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.02–1.73). Overall, our results suggest that end‐stage organ disease and longer duration of dialysis may contribute to higher thyroid cancer incidence in transplant recipients.     

Randomized clinical trial of the effect of microemulsion cyclosporin and tacrolimus on renal allograft fibrosis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of Neoral cyclosporin- and tacrolimus-based therapy on the development of renal allograft fibrosis (chronic allograft nephropathy; CAN) in a prospective randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 102 patients undergoing renal transplantation were randomized to immunosuppression with either microemulsion cyclosporin (Neoral; 15 mg per kg per day adjusted to whole-blood trough concentrations of 200-300 ng/ml) or tacrolimus (0.2 mg per kg per day adjusted to whole-blood trough levels of 8-15 ng/ml) in conjunction with steroids, or at a lower dose (7 mg per kg per day and 0.1 mg per kg per day respectively) with the addition of azathioprine for non-heart-beating renal transplant recipients. Renal transplant interstitial fibrosis was quantified using computerized histomorphometric measurement of picrosirius red-stained 1-year protocol renal transplant biopsies. Levels of interstitial fibrosis were compared in relation to observed efficacy and toxicity profiles of the two drugs. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in allograft interstitial fibrosis in the patients treated with Neoral compared with those given tacrolimus. There was no significant difference in the demographic characteristics between the patient groups or in the incidence of acute rejection (Neoral 36 per cent versus tacrolimus 35 per cent) or steroid-resistant rejection (both 10 per cent) between the two drugs. There was a higher incidence of insulin resistance in the tacrolimus group (post-transplant diabetes mellitus, glucose tolerance testing) but this was not statistically significant. Neoral was associated with a significant increase in total cholesterol (P = 0.030) and low-density lipoprotein (P = 0.021) levels, which persisted throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Despite equivalent efficacy and pretransplantation risk factors for CAN, Neoral was associated with increased allograft fibrosis and significantly higher serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels compared with tacrolimus.     

CAPD and renal transplantation

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is believed to improve the immune competence of end-stage renal failure patients and to increase the risk of graft rejection following subsequent renal transplantation. At this centre, 220 consecutive renal transplants have been studied in patients treated by either CAPD or haemodialysis (HD). Patient and graft survival was not significantly different for the two treatment groups over a five year follow-up. When only first cadaver recipients were considered (152 grafts) one-year graft survival (non-immunological failures excluded) was 77 per cent for CAPD and 79 per cent for HD patients (P greater than 0.05). Time on dialysis and number of pre-operative transfusions were significantly greater for the HD patients (P less than 0.05). A group of HD and CAPD patients were identified as being matched for age, sex, HLA, A, B, DR antigen matches, pre-operative transfusions and time-on dialysis. One-year graft survival of the CAPD patients was 82 per cent and for the HD patients 61 per cent. Studies of patient lymphocyte function and plasma suppressive activity in vitro revealed no differences between CAPD and HD treated patients. CAPD is not an immunological risk factor in renal transplantation and its continued use in the preparation of patients for transplantation is recommended.     

Improvement in short-term pancreas transplant outcome by targeted antimicrobial therapy and refined donor selection

Graft thrombosis and infectious complications are the main early causes of pancreatic allograft loss in recipients of whole vascularized pancreas transplants, resulting in loss rates up to 10 per cent in the first post transplant week. In this study we sought to determine if initiation of a standardized selection criteria and posttransplant chemoprophylaxis regimen could reduce the rate of early allograft loss; we compared the rate of early allograft loss after introduction of these changes. Of the 61 diabetic recipients who underwent these protocols, 50.8 per cent were female. Average age was 42.9 ± 7.4 years of age, average length of stay was 12.7 ± 8.7 days, with all transplants performed heterotopic to the right lower quadrant with venous drainage to the proximal external or common iliac vein. Organ donors were 21.4 ± 4.8 years of age, body mass index was 23.9 ± 2.8 kg/m(2), with a length of stay of 3.7 ± 1.6 days. One-week pancreatic allograft survival for the protocolized versus nonprotocolized patients was 100 per cent versus 96.7 per cent, 1 month was 98.4 per cent versus 93.4 per cent, and 1 year was 96.7 per cent versus 88.5 per cent, respectively. In the protocolized group there were two graft losses due to infectious complications and none due to thrombosis. Before initiation of the protocols patient survival at 1 year was 91.8 per cent and after was 100 per cent. Pancreas transplantation is arguably the most technically demanding organ transplant from a complication and loss standpoint. However, highly successful outcomes can be obtained with standardized protocols beginning pretransplant to reduce the incidence of posttransplant complications.