Medium-Term Results of Cementation of a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liner Into a Well-Fixed Acetabular Shell in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

The present study was undertaken to document outcomes of cementation of a highly cross-linked polyethylene (PE) liner into a well-fixed acetabular metal shell in 36 hips. All operations were performed by a single surgeon using only one type of liner. Patients were followed for a mean of 6.1 years (range, 3–8 years). Mean Harris hip score improved from 58 points preoperatively to 91 points postoperatively. There were no cases of PE liner dislodgement or progressive osteolysis. 1 hip (2.8%) required revision surgery for acetabular cup loosening with greater trochanteric fracture. Complications included 1 peroneal nerve palsy and 1 dislocation. The results of this study and previous reports demonstrated that cementation of highly cross-linked PE liner into well-fixed metal shell could provide good midterm durability.     

The effect of neutron radiation on conventional and highly cross-linked ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene wear

The effects of a sarcoma therapy dose level neutron radiation on oxidation and wear were compared between conventional (N2 Vac, Stryker Orthopedics, Mahwah, NJ) and highly cross-linked (Crossfire, Stryker Orthopedics) ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular liners. Liners were exposed to 15 Gy, a typical sarcoma treatment dose. Wear testing was conducted on a hip simulator. Transvinylene and oxidation indices were measured to determine if significant radiolytic reactions and oxidation occurred after the neutron beam exposure. The neutron bombardment produced further oxidation in both N2 Vac and Crossfire liners. Surprisingly, neutron radiation caused 62% increase in wear for N2 Vac but 0% change for the Crossfire acetabular liners. This study suggested that when joint implants are exposed to neutron beam radiation therapy, the conventional polyethylene liner is at risk for rapid wear.     

Short-term wear of Japanese highly cross-linked polyethylene in cementless THA

INTRODUCTION: Production of polyethylene wear from acetabular liners is thought, in part, to mediate the periprosthetic osteolysis. This study examined the in vivo wear performance of Japanese highly cross-linked polyethylene (Aeonian) in cementless total hip arthroplasty. MATHERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five hips received a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner, while 20 hips were implanted with conventional polyethylene. Two-dimensional linear wear was measured on radiographs and volumetric wear was then calculated. Both linear and volumetric wear rates were examined for the 1-year postoperative period as well as for the time frame beginning after 1 year ending with the final follow-up. RESULTS: The amount of linear wear was significantly lower in the cross-linked group at 3 and 5 years postoperatively (P < 0.01 and < 0.001, respectively). Linear and volumetric wear rates after 1 year postoperatively for hips with the cross-linked polyethylene were significantly reduced by 57 and 59%, respectively, when compared to rates for those who received conventional polyethylene (P < 0.01). A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that cross-linking was a significant factor influencing linear wear rate after 1 year postoperatively with an odds ratio, exp(ss) = 10.033 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the highly cross-linked polyethylene reduces penetration of the femoral head and may be an optimal bearing surface for patients receiving total hip arthroplasty.     

Fixation and Wear With a Contemporary Acetabular Component and Cross-Linked Polyethylene at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

Long term total hip arthroplasty follow-up has demonstrated bearing surface wear and failure of fixation as the major modes of failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the minimum 10 year results of a third generation cementless acetabular component using moderately cross-linked polyethylene liners. 150 primary THAs were evaluated clinically for need for revision and activity evaluated using accelerometers, WOMAC, Tegner and UCLA activity-level scores. Radiographs were evaluated for wear, osteolysis and loosening. We compared this cohort to three of our previously reported cohorts. The only revision was unrelated to liner wear and all acetabular components were bone ingrown. There were no cases of acetabular osteolysis and one case of femoral osteolysis. Average steps per year were 1.59 million. Mean steady state wear rate averaged 0.04 mm/year. At 10-years, excellent fixation and low wear were demonstrated using a cementless acetabular construct and moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner.     

The strength of a cement acetabular locking mechanism

To minimize the morbidity associated with revision of a well-fixed acetabular shell, some surgeons advocate cementing a polyethylene liner into the shell when a liner exchange is not possible. So far the strength of this cement locking mechanism has been measured on only a few specimens. The purpose of this study is to correct that oversight by measuring the push-out and lever-out strengths of an acetabular polyethylene liner cemented into a porous-coated shell. We cemented acetabular liners into porous-coated acetabular shells using first-generation cementing techniques. Each of 30 specimens was tested for its push-out or lever-out strength. The results suggest that the strength of a cemented polyethylene liner locking mechanism is similar to that of an uncemented acetabular shell.     

Ten- to Sixteen-Year Follow-Up of Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Factors Affect Wear?

BackgroundIncrease in acetabular cup abduction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using conventional polyethylene is associated with greater linear wear. Whether this relationship holds true for highly crosslinked liners, particularly with long-term follow-up, is still controversial. The effect of liner thickness on wear of highly cross-linked liners also remains to be clarified.This study sought to determine (1) the long-term clinical and radiological performance of highly cross-linked polyethylene in THA and (2) the effect of acetabular component positioning, polyethylene thickness, and patient demographics on wear.MethodsNinety-three THAs using a 28-mm hip ball, single brand of highly cross-linked polyethylene liner, and cementless cup were performed in 87 patients. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score and need for revision surgery. Linear and volumetric wear, presence of osteolysis, and cup abduction angle were assessed.ResultsThe mean age at operation was 51.4 years. The mean duration of follow-up was 12.7 years (10-16 years). Patients aged >50 years had higher rates of linear wear than those aged <50 years (P = .015). Positive correlation was found between cup abduction angle (P = .014) and cup version (P = .035) with a linear wear rate. Thinner liners (≤7 mm) had similar rates of linear and volumetric wear as thicker liners (≥8 mm) (P = .447).ConclusionThis is the only study to demonstrate a positive significant relationship between cup abduction angle and version with linear wear rate in THA with at least 10 years of follow-up. Liner thickness was not found to affect wear rates.     

Cementation of a polyethylene liner into a metal acetabular shell: a biomechanical study

Cementation of a liner into a well-fixed acetabular shell is common in revision hip arthroplasty. We compare the biomechanical strengths of cemented liners with standard locked liners. Fifty polyethylene liners were inserted into acetabular shells using the standard locking mechanism or 1 of 2 cement types then loaded to failure by torsion or lever-out testing. Lever-out testing showed that all cemented liners failed at similar loads to standard locked liners. With torsion testing, cemented liners failed at significantly higher loads than standard locked liners; roughening the liner increased load to failure. Cementation of an acetabular liner into a metal shell is safe and strong and a good alternative to metal shell replacement. Saw roughening of the polyethylene liner strengthens the poly-cement interface.     

Scratching vulnerability of conventional vs highly cross-linked polyethylene liners because of large embedded third-body particles

The hypothesis of this study was that acetabular liner vulnerability to scratching from femoral heads, roughened by third bodies embedded in the liner, is not significantly lower for highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXPE) than for conventional polyethylene (CPE). Six CPE and 6 HXPE acetabular liners were each reproducibly embedded with 5 cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) beads then run for 10,000 cycles in a joint simulator. By visual rank ordering, there was low association between liner scratch severity and polyethylene type. The CPE and HXPE liner scratches were not significantly different in scratch peak-valley height or width or in liner roughness in the vicinity of the embedded beads. This model indicated that high cross-linking of polyethylene does not offer appreciable protection against severe scratching induced by large embedded third-body particles.     

The effect of entrapped bone particles on the surface morphology and wear of polyethylene

Clinically retrieved highly cross-linked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (HXPE) acetabular liners have demonstrated scratching, whereas conventional ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) implants show a smoother surface early after implantation. In the present study, the potential of bone particles and soft tissues, rather than cement, to scratch the articular surface of HXPE and UHMWPE (gamma radiated) acetabular components was evaluated; multiple bone particles located at the articular surface for 3600 simulated walking cycles replicated the scratches observed on retrieved implants. By remelting, these scratches were confirmed to be due to plastic deformation of the polyethylene, not wear. Furthermore, it was shown using wear testing that these scratches did not affect the subsequent wear rate of HXPE or conventional UHMWPE. Wear rates of scratched conventional and cross-linked polyethylene were not significantly different from unscratched conventional and cross-linked polyethylene, respectively.     

Wear testing of a canine hip resurfacing implant that uses highly cross‐linked polyethylene

Hip resurfacing offers advantages for young, active patients afflicted with hip osteoarthritis and may also be a beneficial treatment for adult canines. Conventional hip resurfacing uses metal‐on‐metal bearings to preserve bone stock, but it may be feasible to use metal‐on‐polyethylene bearings to reduce metal wear debris while still preserving bone. This study characterized the short‐term wear behavior of a novel hip resurfacing implant for canines that uses a 1.5 mm thick liner of highly cross‐linked polyethylene in the acetabular component. This implant was tested in an orbital bearing machine that simulated canine gait for 1.1 million cycles. Wear of the liner was evaluated using gravimetric analysis and by measuring wear depth with an optical scanner. The liners had a steady‐state mass wear rate of 0.99 ± 0.17 mg per million cycles and an average wear depth in the central liner region of 0.028 mm. No liners, shells, or femoral heads had any catastrophic failure due to yielding or fracture. These results suggest that the thin liners will not prematurely crack after implantation in canines. This is the first hip resurfacing device developed for canines, and this study is the first to characterize the in vitro wear of highly cross‐linked polyethylene liners in a hip resurfacing implant. The canine implant developed in this study may be an attractive treatment option for canines afflicted with hip osteoarthritis, and since canines are the preferred animal model for human hip replacement, this implant can support the development of metal‐on‐polyethylene hip resurfacing technology for human patients. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1196–1205, 2018.

     

Gait instability may indicate liner failure in patients with total hip arthroplasty. A report of three cases

Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most common and successful orthopaedic procedures performed worldwide. Uncemented modular acetabular components and highly cross-linked polyethylene liners are the implants of choice for most arthroplasty surgeons. However, despite their well-known benefits, highly cross-linked polyethylene liners are not without complications, such as rim fracture, rupture and dissociation. We report three patients with gait instability and radiographic subluxation due to highly cross-linked polyethylene liner failures evidenced during stage one revision surgery. The three patients were symptoms free, with no new instability episodes, and the radiographs showed no evidence of implant loosening at the most recent follow-up. Although it is a rare complication, these three cases highlight the importance of suspecting and evaluating highly cross-linked polyethylene liner failures in patients referred for gait instability with no history of previous trauma.     

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Standard and Elevated-Rim Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Acetabular Liners in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up: Single-Center,Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundThe aims of the present study are to (1) conduct the longest-to-date follow-up wear analysis of the highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners, (2) assess the incidence of femoral and acetabular osteolysis, and (3) compare the surgical outcomes between standard and elevated-rim acetabular liners in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 112 primary THAs performed by a single experienced arthroplasty surgeon at our institution between March 2000 and December 2003. Patients were classified based on the type of acetabular liner used: standard or elevated-rim liner. For evaluation of surgical outcomes, the following data were collected: acetabular cup position (anteversion and inclination), wear rate (linear and volumetric), presence of osteolysis, history of reoperation (all-cause and wear-related), complications (deep joint infection, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture), and Harris hip score at last follow-up.ResultsLinear and volumetric wear rates were 0.028 mm/y (0.000-0.145 mm/y) and 11.641 mm³/y (0.000-70.000 mm³/y) in the standard group and 0.026 mm/y (0.000-0.094mm/y) and 9.706 mm³/y (0.000-33.000 mm³/y) in the elevated-rim group, respectively. These rates were not significantly different between groups. One case of osteolysis was confirmed in the standard group, whereas no osteolysis was observed in the elevated-rim group.ConclusionWe suggest that elevated-rim highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners might be a good implant option that can be used safely.     

Crack Initiation in Retrieved Cross-Linked Highly Cross-Linked Ultrahigh-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Acetabular Liners : An Investigation of 9 Cases

Nine cross-linked highly cross-linked ultrahigh-molecularweight polyethylene acetabular liners were retrieved at revision surgery. Eight of the liners were fully intact and functional at retrieval. Six cases contained shallow initiated cracks at the root of rim notches; 1 crack had propagated several millimeters. Optical and electron microscopic inspection of the crack surfaces revealed clam shell markings, which are characteristic of fatigue crack initiation. Crack initiation at notches has been identified in reports of catastrophic cross-linked liner failures, with crack initiation sites exhibiting similar morphology and clam shell markings. Thus, we believe that the shallow cracks identified in this case series are precursors to catastrophic rim fracture. The results of this study recommend further investigations to clarify the etiology and prevalence of crack initiation in cross-linked acetabular liners.     

Multidirectional deformation in fully congruent acetabular components

Most clinical studies have used femoral head migration as an index of acetabular wear, but a previous study showed multiple wear vectors in 30% of retrieved acetabular components with noncongruent liners. The origin of multiple wear vectors is unclear, and it has been suggested that polyethylene creep in a noncongruent shell might influence deformation on the articular surface. We used shadowgraph and volumetric methods to evaluate the extent and direction of surface deformation of 37 retrieved polyethylene liners that were fully congruent to a single design of metal backing. The results show that multiple deformation vectors are relatively common in retrieved acetabular cups (27% in this study) and are independent of congruency between liner and metal backing, rim impingement, and backside creep. Polyethylene liners with multiple wear vectors were significantly thinner than those of cups with a single vector. The origin of multiple vectors is still unclear, but clinical and laboratory studies measuring linear wear alone without recognizing multiple vectors underestimate total in vivo volumetric wear.     

10-Year Follow-Up Wear Analysis of Marathon Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Short-term and intermediate-term wear rates for highly cross-linked polyethylene (HCLPE) liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are significantly lower than published rates for traditional polyethylene liners. The aim of this study was to report the longest-to-date follow-up of a specific HCLPE liner.

骨水泥聚乙烯内衬技术在全髋内衬翻修中的生物力学研究

目的评估骨水泥聚乙烯内衬技术应用于全髋内衬翻修时的生物力学强度。方法 25对金属髋臼及聚乙烯内衬假体随机分为5组(n=5),以标准锁定装置为对照(A组),其余4组应用骨水泥聚乙烯内衬技术固定聚乙烯内衬,分为无钢珠聚乙烯内衬与金属髋臼0°交角组(B组)、带钢珠聚乙烯内衬与金属髋臼0°交角组(C组)、带钢珠聚乙烯内衬与金属髋臼10°交角组(D组)、带钢珠聚乙烯内衬与金属髋臼20°交角组(E组)。通过杠杆试验模拟体内内衬失败情况,测定各组抗杠杆力强度。结果 A～E组抗杠杆力分别为(626.68±206.12)、(915.04±197.49)、(449.02±119.78)、(814.68±53.89)、(1 033.05±226.44)N,组间比较差异有统计学意义(F=8.989,P=0.000)。其中B、E组抗杠杆力大于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);C、D组抗杠杆力与A组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论用骨水泥聚乙烯内衬技术将内衬与金属髋臼以≤20°交角固定于金属髋臼内,能提供足够的初始固定强度。     

Clinical performance of a Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liner for total hip arthroplasty at five years

BACKGROUND: Highly cross-linked polyethylene is currently the most common articulation surface used for total hip arthroplasty. The hypothesis of the present study was that the Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liner would have less wear at five years than would a conventional polyethylene liner used in association with the same total hip replacement system. METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients (fifty hips) underwent total hip replacement with an uncemented titanium porous-coated metal cup and a Durasul liner that was mated with a 28-mm cobalt-chromium femoral head. Thirty-one patients (thirty-seven hips) were followed for at least five years. Thirty-five other patients (thirty-seven hips) underwent total hip arthroplasty with the same system but with a conventional polyethylene liner, and these patients also were followed for five years. Clinical assessment was performed with use of the Harris hip score and a patient self-assessment examination. Radiographic analysis included measurements of acetabular component position, fixation, and osteolysis. Femoral head penetration of the Durasul liners was compared with that of the conventional liners. RESULTS: The clinical results as determined on the basis of Harris hip scores and patient self-assessment examinations did not differ between the Durasul group and the control group. The mean bedding-in penetration was 0.054 +/- 0.07 mm for the Durasul group and 0.059 +/- 0.154 mm for the control group. The subsequent penetration, with elimination of the bedding-in wear, resulted in a linear wear rate of 0.029 +/- 0.02 mm per year for the Durasul group, compared with 0.065 +/- 0.03 mm per year for the control group (p < 0.005). The annual penetration at one and five years was 0.074 mm and 0.011 mm, respectively, for the Durasul group, compared with 0.151 mm and 0.04 mm, respectively, for the control group. CONCLUSIONS: While the qualitative wear pattern of the highly cross-linked polyethylene liner was the same as that of the conventional polyethylene liner, the annual linear wear rate was 45% of that seen with the conventional polyethylene liner. Therefore, we believe that these early data support the continued use of this highly cross-linked polyethylene liner for total hip arthroplasty.     

Wear in conventional and highly cross-linked polyethylene cups: a 5-year follow-up study

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) has been introduced in total hip arthroplasty in an effort to reduce polyethylene wear and the associated periprosthetic osteolysis. Our aim was to demonstrate these reduced wear rates in a 2-dimensional head penetration model and to perform a clinical comparison of both groups using the Harris Hip Score (and SF-36 questionnaire). Sixty hips with a Trilogy XLPE liner (Zimmer) were matched and compared to a control group of 20 conventional Trilogy PE liners (Zimmer). No differences in clinical outcome were seen, but a statistically significant reduction in linear wear was observed in the XLPEgroup, after 5 years. It is clear that, because of the reduction and stabilization of free radicals in polyethylene, a reduction in annual wear can be achieved.     

Isolated acetabular liner exchange

During the past two decades, most total hip arthroplasties were performed with metal or ceramic heads on conventional polyethylene, an articulation associated with wear and limited life expectancy. Wear is associated with acetabular osteolysis. Isolated liner exchange has become a common surgical intervention when the acetabular component remains well-fixed. The purpose of isolated liner exchange is to prevent loosening of the components secondary to osteolysis and catastrophic mechanical failure caused by bearing wear-through. Treatment options for polyethylene wear include observation (in the asymptomatic hip), liner exchange, and more extensive revision procedures. Patients frequently present with asymptomatic but substantial polyethylene wear with or without associated osteolysis, the treatment of which is controversial. Other areas of debate include complete acetabular component removal to allow bone grafting and placement of an improved bearing surface, reuse of modular mechanisms, cementation into well-fixed shells, and whether to use periacetabular bone grafting.     

Cementation of a polyethylene liner into a metal shell. Factors related to mechanical stability

BACKGROUND: Various clinical situations may make polyethylene liner exchange desirable in the setting of a well-fixed metal shell. Options have included a simple polyethylene liner exchange or revision of the entire acetabular shell. A recently introduced technique involves cementation of a new liner into a well-fixed metal shell. The purposes of this study were to quantify the mechanical integrity of this method of liner fixation, to evaluate the factors that may influence immediate liner fixation, and to compare this construct with a standard locking mechanism. METHODS: One modular acetabular cup design was evaluated. Variables that may contribute to the mechanical integrity of the construct were evaluated via lever-out and multiaxis dislocation testing methods. The variables included the size of the liner (undersized versus oversized), type of liner (all-polyethylene versus modular design), modification of the modular liner (unmodified versus grooved), and groove configuration (cruciform versus circumferential). Metal shells with and without screw-holes were also tested. The modular locking mechanism was used as the control. RESULTS: None of the constructs failed at the cement-metal interface. All undersized liners required significantly higher loads to failure than either the controls (p < 0.001) or the oversized liners (p < 0.001). Oversized unmodified liners failed at significantly lower loads than the controls did (p < 0.01). The creation of circumferential grooves in the oversized liners significantly improved the strength of the constructs (p < 0.01), making them comparable with the controls. No significant differences were found among the four undersized groups (p > 0.3). The standard locking construct (control) and the oversized unmodified construct failed at a force of 2000 N in the multiaxis dislocation test. No other construct failed with use of this test mode. CONCLUSIONS: Cementation of a polyethylene liner into a metal shell can be stronger than a conventional locking mechanism if the liner is undersized. Cementation of an oversized liner into a shell should be performed with caution. The long-term durability of this fixation remains unknown.