Meeting patient expectations of care: the major determinant of satisfaction with out-of-hours primary medical care?

BACKGROUND: Client or consumer expectation is considered to influence their satisfaction with the service provided, but its importance has not been quantified in health care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of "patient expectations of care" on satisfaction with care provided by out-of-hours services. METHODS: We surveyed 3457 patients who requested out-of-hours care from five practices, two general practice out-of-hours co-operatives and a deputizing service in an English health authority during late 1997. The independent variables were: the service providing the care (service type), where out-of-hours care was given (location of care) and whether the care met the patient's expectations. The independent variable was overall patient satisfaction with out-of-hours care. RESULTS: Patients who received the care they hoped for (their idealized expectation was met) were more satisfied than those who did not. Patients who attended centres were more satisfied with the care received than those who had had home visits. Patients were more satisfied if they received care from the co-operative which did not employ assistants than from the deputizing service. Idealized expectation (care which was hoped for) match, location of care and service type explained 34, 2 and 4% of the variance, respectively. Age, sex, ethnicity, access to a car, normative/comparative expectation (care which was expected) and whether patients expected and received telephone advice, a home visit or domiciliary care, and the delay between request for care and care provision were not independently associated with satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Meeting or failing to meet the care patients hoped for is an important predictor of patient satisfaction with out-of-hours care. Purchasers and providers of out-of-hours care should consider whether and how patient expectation of service can be managed. This may reduce patient dissatisfaction with the service they provide. These findings also have important implications for the design of studies which use patient satisfaction as an outcome variable.     

Developing a standard short questionnaire for the assessment of patient satisfaction with out-of-hours primary care

BACKGROUND: Governmental reviews of out-of-hours services in England and Scotland have recommended that a standard questionnaire should be used to assess patient satisfaction. This is important because of the rapid introduction of new forms of care. OBJECTIVE: To produce a brief, reliable and valid measure of patient satisfaction for use by a wide variety of providers of out-of-hours primary care. METHODS: The Short Questionnaire for Out-of-Hours care was designed and compared with a longer questionnaire which had been validated and used in earlier research. Questionnaires were sent to 1906 people contacting an out-of-hours GP co-operative. Three versions of the short questionnaire were used with different formats. Analysis compared the response rates, measurement properties, concurrent and construct validity of the short and long questionnaires, and of different versions of the short questionnaire. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the overall response rates obtained from the short or long questionnaires (45.7% versus 41.9%; P = 0.17). The effective response rate of questionnaires from which all satisfaction scales could be calculated was higher for the short questionnaire (43.0% versus 36.4%; P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in response rates or distribution of responses between different versions of the short questionnaire. There was moderate agreement between items on the short questionnaire and corresponding scales on the long questionnaire. Scores using the short questionnaire showed anticipated relationships with the age and sex of patients and with characteristics of how the service was delivered. The SQOC is valid and reliable for routine service use.     

The effect of health status on patients' satisfaction with out-of-hours care provided by a family doctor co-operative

BACKGROUND: Systems for providing primary care outside normal hours have changed significantly in Europe over the last 20 years. The impetus for this change has come almost entirely from the medical profession, and it is important to consider the patients' perspective. Although patient's satisfaction with out-of-hours care has been studied extensively, the effect of patient's health status on satisfaction level has not been examined previously. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether health status has an influence on patient satisfaction with out-of-hours care provided by a family doctor co-operative. The secondary objective of this study was to investigate the impact of age, gender, socio-economic status and call outcome on patients' satisfaction with out-of-hours care. METHODS: All patients contacting the service over a designated 24 day period were forwarded a postal questionnaire. Health status was recorded using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) health survey. Patients' satisfaction was measured by using a version of the McKinley questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 55% (531 out of 966). Overall satisfaction levels were high, with 88% of patients rating the service as either excellent or good. Logistic regression, modelling for the simultaneous effects of age, gender, socio-economic status, call outcome and health status on overall satisfaction, found that patients with lower physical and mental health status scores were significantly less likely to be satisfied with their out-of-hours care [odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.07, P = 0.017; and 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06, P = 0.046, respectively]. Patients with higher socio-economic status were also significantly less likely to be satisfied (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.55, P = 0.001). Patient's age and gender, and call outcome did not significantly affect overall satisfaction levels. CONCLUSION: Family doctor co-operatives have significantly altered the way out-of-hours care is delivered. Patients with lower health status are significantly less likely to be satisfied with this new form of out-of-hours care. This finding has important implications for the future planning of out-of-hours primary care services.     

Patient-perceived benefits of and barriers to using out-of-hours primary care centres

BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of GP co-operatives has encouraged the development of primary care centres, but little is known about patients' views and experiences of these new forms of out-of-hours service delivery. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to understand patients' views, expectations and experiences of attending an out-of-hours primary care centre which was part of an inner London GP co-operative. METHODS: Systematic samples of patients using the out-of-hours service received semi-structured interviews covering the decision to contact the service, expectations and experience of the service and, if relevant, the experience of travelling to the primary care centre. Interviews were conducted by telephone between 7 and 10 days after patient contact. RESULTS: Interviews were completed with 55.4% (72/130) of sampled patients who were primary care centre attenders, 50.0% (47/94) of those receiving telephone advice and 45.3% (53/117) of those receiving a home visit. Most attenders of the primary care centre said that they were satisfied with the consultation (90.0%, 65) and were able to get all the help they needed (83%, 60). The speed of being seen and the opportunity of having a face-to-face consultation were key benefits identified. For some, this outweighed difficulties experienced in attending the centre, including arranging transport, caring for other children, managing several children on the journey and travelling while ill. The main barriers patients identified for not wanting to attend the primary care centre included feeling too ill to travel, having other dependants to care for or lacking transportation. CONCLUSIONS: While primary care centres offer patients speedy access to face-to-face consultations, there are a range of obstacles which are encountered. Those who are socially disadvantaged appear likely to experience greatest difficulty, raising concerns about equity in access to services. Out-of-hours services may need to give consideration to patient transport and a more flexible approach to visiting at home if such inequities are to be avoided.     

General practitioners' satisfaction with and attitudes to out-of-hours services

Background  

In recent years, Dutch general practitioner (GP) out-of-hours service has been reorganised into large-scale GP cooperatives. Until now little is known about GPs' experiences with working at these cooperatives for out-of-hours care. The purpose of this study is to gain insight into GPs' satisfaction with working at GP cooperatives for out-of-hours care in separated and integrated cooperatives.     

Patients’ experiences and views of an emergency and urgent care system

Background Surveys of patients’ experiences and views of health care usually focus on single services. During an unexpected episode of ill health, patients may make contact with different services and therefore experience care within an emergency and urgent care system. We developed the Urgent Care System Questionnaire and used it to describe patients’ experiences and views of an emergency and urgent care system in England. Methods A market research company used quota sampling and random digit dialling to undertake a telephone survey of 1000 members of the general population in July 2007. Results 15% (151/1000) of the population reported using the emergency and urgent care system in the previous 3 months. Two thirds of users (68%, 98/145) contacted more than one service for their most recent event, with a mean of 2.0 services per event. Users entered the system through a range of services: the majority contacted a daytime GP in the first instance (59%, 85/145), and 12% (18/145) contacted either a 999 emergency ambulance or an emergency department. Satisfaction with all aspects of care diminished when four or more services had been contacted. Conclusions This is the first study to describe patients’ experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system. The majority of patients experienced a system of care rather than single service care. There was an indication that longer pathways resulted in lower levels of patient satisfaction. Health care organisations can undertake similar surveys to identify problems with their system or to assess the impact of changes made to their system.     

Clients’ Perceptions of Service Quality and Satisfaction at Their Initial Title X Family Planning Visit

Family planning service quality and clients’ satisfaction with services are important determinants of clients’ contraceptive use and continuation. We examine women’s experiences at family planning clinics on a range of dimensions, including patient-centered communication (PCC), and identify experiences associated with higher ratings of service quality and satisfaction. New female clients (n = 748), ages 18–35 years, from clinics in three major metropolitan areas completed computer-administered interviews between 2008 and 2009. Factors associated with primary outcomes of service quality and satisfaction were assessed using multinomial and ordinary logistic regression, respectively. Higher scores on a Clinician–Client Centeredness Scale, measuring whether clinicians were respectful, listened, and provided thoughtful explanations, were associated with perceptions of good quality care and being very satisfied. Higher scores on a Clinic Discomfort Scale, measuring staff and waiting-room experiences, were associated with reduced satisfaction. Clients’ interactions with clinicians, especially PCC, influence their perceptions of service quality, whereas their satisfaction with services is also influenced by the facility environment. These measures are adaptable for agencies to identify the factors contributing to their own clients’ satisfaction–dissatisfaction with care and perceptions of service quality.     

Out-of-hours co-operatives: General practitioner satisfaction with governance and working arrangements

Objective. General practice co-operatives have led to significant improvements in quality of life for general practitioners. Little is known about general practitioners’ own experiences with the working arrangements and governance of co-operatives. This study investigates GP satisfaction, the working environment, governance and future developments in co-operatives. Methods. A questionnaire was sent to GPs in two co-operatives in the Republic of Ireland, covering mixed urban and rural areas. Results. Of 221 GPs in the co-operatives, 82% responded and confirmed the co-operatives’ positive effects on their lives. However, 57% still received requests for out-of-hours care while off duty, most commonly from patients who preferred to see their own doctor. Half felt overburdened by out-of-hours work, especially those over 40 y of age. Twenty-five per cent were dissatisfied with the GP complaints mechanism. The majority (63%) would prefer a GP/health board partnership for the organization of out of hours, while 23% wanted sole responsibility. GPs indicated a strong need for better ancillary services such as nursing, mental health, dentistry, pharmacy and social work. Access to records is an important issue in terminal care and mental illness. Conclusion. While GP co-operatives are a success story for general practice, they will work better for general practitioners and their patients if nursing, mental health, dentistry, pharmacy and social services are improved. Support and training is needed in mental health, palliative and emergency care to increase competence and reduce stress. GPs are willing to work with health authorities in further co-operative development. More attention needs to be paid to the complaints and suggestions of GPs in the running and governance of their co-operatives.     

Patient satisfaction with out-of-hours primary care in the Netherlands

Background  

In recent years out-of-hours primary care in the Netherlands has changed from practice-based to large-scale cooperatives. The purpose of this study is to determine patient satisfaction with current out-of-hours care organised in general practitioner (GP) cooperatives, and gain insight in factors associated with this satisfaction.     

Better Self-report Health Status and Provider–Patient Communication in Dental Service Can Improve the Patient Experience: A Cross-year Comparison from the NHI Survey

ABSTRACT

Several factors, including healthcare outcomes and quality, influence patients’ expectations of healthcare services. Currently, as patients have more understanding about dental care services, patient satisfaction is essential for continually improving the services being provided. The purpose of this study is to analyze the multiyear annual National Health Insurance (NHI) patient experience survey in Taiwan to explore the factors associated with the satisfaction rate from 2012–2016. This study used the annual NHI survey to explore patients’ experiences of receiving medical service in dental care from 2012 to 2016. There were over 40 major items in the survey each year; however, we only selected suitable items that followed the Andersen model. We ran a logistics regression testing the relationship between the covariates and the items related to satisfaction in outcomes in different years. Patients who received health education from a provider in most time, self-reported better health status, felt that cost of care was not expensive, did not wait too long for counseling time and found it easy to make an appointment, had two to ten times greater satisfaction in outcomes compared with those who did not (OR: 1.83–10.06). Individuals working in the healthcare industry should implement communication strategies to improve patients’ experience in the care process by including easy-to-understand explanations or sharing decision-making with patients. Furthermore, in patient experience surveys in dental care, less attention should be paid to whether patients can provide meaningful quality measures and more attention to ways in which patient experiences can be improved. This can be achieved by providing easy-to-understand explanations, giving patients an opportunity to express their concerns, and by sharing decision-making with patients     

Exploring stakeholder experiences of dietetic service and care delivery: A systematic qualitative review

Background

There is limited understanding of patients' and healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences of receiving and delivering dietetic care, respectively. This systematic review of the literature used qualitative synthesis to explore the perceptions and experiences of multiple stakeholders involved in the delivery of nutrition care and dietetic service.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO and ProQuest were systematically searched. Study characteristics and perceptions of stakeholders regarding nutrition care services were extracted. Qualitative synthesis was employed and thematic analysis conducted.

Results

Five themes were identified from 44 studies related to stakeholders' perceptions of dietetic services. Studies included quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods involving patients, families, dietitians and other healthcare professionals. The themes were (1) patients desiring a personalised approach to nutrition care; (2) accessing dietetic service; (3) perceived impact of nutrition care on the patient; (4) relationships between stakeholders; and (5) beliefs about nutrition expertise. Two themes were specific to patients; these were the desire for individualised care and the impact of nutrition care. Within each theme perceptions varied with patients' views often contrasting with those of dietetic service providers.

Conclusions

Experiences of dietetic service do not always meet stakeholder expectations which impacts on patient engagement. Seeking stakeholder input is imperative to design dietetic services that engage patients in positive and supportive clinical partnerships.     

Incorporating patients'' voices in the audit process.

Obtaining patients' views about their experiences of care should be an integral part of clinical audit. The importance of listening to patients as an aspect of quality can be attributed, in part, to the growth of consumerism in health care, and this in turn has led to the widespread use of satisfaction surveys to obtain patients' views. This paper raises some doubts about current methods for assessing patient satisfaction, and recommends the use of qualitative methods to capture patients' voices in audit.     

Course of glycaemia in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes patients 2.5 years after optimizing oral treatment in general practice

Abstract

Objective: To investigate GPs’ perceptions of consultation outcomes and to investigate the associations between these and outcomes perceived by the patients. Design: 25 GPs and 10 patients for each GP filled in a questionnaire about the outcome of the same consultation. The questions in the questionnaires were formulated from concepts found in preceding qualitative studies. Their answers were analysed and compared. Setting: GPs and patients from 16 group practices in Norrbotten, Sweden. Results: The GPs had the apprehension that their consultations would lead to cure/symptom relief in half of their consultations. They believed that their patients were satisfied up to 90% and that up to 75% had been reassured, understood more or could cope better. The GPs were satisfied themselves with up to 95% of the consultations, they enhanced their relationship to their patient up to 70%. Their affirmative concordance with their patients was high regarding satisfaction, intermediate regarding patient reassurance and patient understanding and lowest regarding cure/symptom relief.

Conclusion: The GPs’ were lacking in their ability to assess the patients’ increased understanding and the concordance between their own and the patients’ expectation of cure/symptom relief was low.     

Patient satisfaction with large-scale out-of-hours primary health care in The Netherlands: development of a postal questionnaire

BACKGROUND: Since the turn of the millennium, out-of-hours primary health care in The Netherlands has faced a substantial change from small locum groups towards large GP cooperatives. Improving the quality of care requires evaluation of patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable postal questionnaire for wide-scale use by patients contacting their out-of-hours GP cooperative and to present the results of a national survey. METHODS: Literature review and interviews with both patients and health carers were carried out to identify issues of potential relevance, followed by two postal pilot studies and additional interviews to remove or rephrase items. Finally, postal questionnaires were sent to 14,400 people who contacted one of 24 GP cooperatives in The Netherlands. RESULTS: Overall response was 52.2% for all types of contact. Three scales were identified prior to the field phase and confirmed by principal components analysis: telephone nurse, doctor and organization. Reliability was high, with Cronbach's alphas and intraclass correlation coefficients exceeding 0.70 for all scales. Only items in the organization scale showed clear differences among the participating cooperatives. Respondents receiving telephone advice showed lower levels of satisfaction than respondents with other types of contact (P < 0.001); centre consultation scored lower than home visit (P < 0.030 or less for all differences). CONCLUSION: A reliable measure of patient satisfaction has been developed that can also be used for the comparison of GP cooperatives on an organizational level. Overall satisfaction was high, showing highest levels for home visit and lowest levels for telephone advice.     

Analysis of Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction

Background

Patient satisfaction is regarded as an important indicator in assessing the quality of care. Over the past 20 years, in particular, there has been increasing interest in patients’ perceptions about the provision of healthcare. Although asthma is a disease that increases the burden on health expenditure and has high cost requirements, there have been few studies evaluating the views of asthma patients about their treatment. The aims of this study were to identify factors affecting the satisfaction of asthma patients and to contribute to the sparse literature on this topic.

Methods

The study sample consisted of 387 asthma patients who were referred to Hacettepe University’s Chest Diseases Polyclinic and Allergy Unit in Ankara, Turkey, between August 2000 and March 2001. A questionnaire consisting of 66 questions was developed to explore demographic characteristics (11 questions), quality of life (32 questions), severity of disease (2 questions), and patient satisfaction with the care received (21 questions). The items for the satisfaction part of the questionnaire were selected from three separate questionnaires used in three independent studies, including the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Factor analysis was performed on the satisfaction items, which revealed five dimensions in which the items were grouped: (i) doctor competency; (ii) provision of information; (iii) quality of care; (iv) waiting time; and (v) hospital quality. The general reliability coefficient was 0.87. Regression analyses were carried out to determine how patient’satisfaction with their medical treatment was affected by the following variables: demographic characteristics (age, other diseases, sex, education, duration of treatment), severity of disease, quality of life, whether medical tests were performed, and whether treatment was received from academic physicians (professors and associate professors) or from consultants and assistants.

Results

The results of the regression analyses revealed that patients who had undergone medical tests or who had received treatment from academic physicians (rather than from consultants or assistants) had higher satisfaction levels than their counterparts. Furthermore, female patients had higher levels of satisfaction than their male counterparts. In addition, it was found that the five satisfaction dimensions were all significantly correlated with each other and that patients’ general satisfaction was also significantly correlated with all five satisfaction dimensions. The percentages of patient satisfaction that were likely to be explained by the variables used in the study were 22.7% for doctor competency, 25.6% for provision of information, 46.2% for quality of care, 13.7% for waiting time, and 9% for hospital quality. Overall, 32.4% of satisfaction was explained by the variables used in the study.

Conclusion

The fact that only 32.4% of general patient satisfaction was explained by the variables used in the study indicates that there are still very important gaps in our understanding of factors affecting patient satisfaction. This study found that the levels of patient satisfaction with care were influenced by provider characteristics (academic status) rather than patient characteristics. After controlling for patient characteristics, patients of professor and associate professor physicians were more satisfied than patients of assistant physicians, especially in regard to doctor competency, quality of care, provision of information, waiting time, and overall satisfaction. Medical education should continue to emphasize the importance of these aspects of the physician-patient encounter. A qualitative approach could be used in further research to investigate the variance that cannot be explained by other models.

     

Access to and use of out-of-hours services by members of Vietnamese community groups in South London: a focus group study.

BACKGROUND: Communication difficulties, lack of knowledge of services and the appropriateness of services influence access to health care services by black and ethnic minority groups. These problems may be accentuated outside normal working hours. This may be so particularly for those who do not speak English as a first language, as interpreting services across the UK are extremely limited in the out-of-hours period. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the experiences and perceptions of members of the Vietnamese community groups in seeking out-of-hours health services and to identify potential solutions from participants' perspectives. METHOD: This qualitative study used a focus group methodology. Participants were members of three established community groups in the South London boroughs of Southwark and Lewisham. Participants attended six focus groups which were conducted in Cantonese and Vietnamese. RESULTS: Participants did not know about GPs' out-of-hours arrangements. And their access to the range of services normally available was limited. They were unable to communicate with health care professionals or answering services and were unaware of out-of-hours interpreting arrangements. Generally, participants were dependent on other people in gaining access to services. Some participants had used 999 services despite communication problems. Participants' experienced delays in seeking health care services and confusion regarding the medicines and advice given. CONCLUSIONS: Communication difficulties limited knowledge of and access to out-of-hours services for the Vietnamese participants. Direct contact with interpreters in the out-of-hours period was suggested as a means of increasing participants' ability to gain access to services. Health service planners need to be aware of the difficulties experienced by such groups if issues of equity in gaining access to health care services are to be addressed.