Developing and Implementing Randomized Effectiveness Trials in General Medical Settings

This article discusses the development of two mental health services research programs: one targeting depression treatment in primary care and the other early intervention for posttraumatic stress disorders in acute care. Both programs have used the randomized effectiveness trial to assess the delivery of empirically supported psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacologic interventions in these general medical settings. This article explores the fellowship training, clinical experiences, and conceptual frameworks that have informed the progression of the two research programs. Specific modifications to the traditional randomized clinical trial design employed in the effectiveness trials are discussed. This article concludes with reflection on intervention development trajectories and interdisciplinary team compositions that may facilitate the development of mental health interventions that both derive from the best scientific evidence and can be feasibly delivered in real-world treatment settings.     

Examining Psychotherapy Processes in a Services Research Context

Interdisciplinary research efforts integrating services and interventions research methodologies are needed to improve the "real-world" clinical utility and impact of youth mental health research. "Hybrid" services and interventions research efforts can capitalize on the methodologic strengths of each research tradition in order to more rigorously examine and affect therapy processes in usual care youth mental health service settings. The goals of this article are to (a) identify the need for hybrid practice research on youth mental health care; (b) present a "case example" of a hybrid study, where child and family therapy processes are being examined in a usual care, practice-based context by a team of services researchers; (c) address the potential advantages and challenges of hybrid research; and (d) suggest promising areas for future hybrid research in youth mental health care.     

Psychologists in Long-Term Care: Overview of Practice and Public Policy: Introduction to the Special Series

With the overall aging of the population and the concomitant need for the provision of mental health care for older adults, professional psychology in long-term care has come of age. Psychologists are now increasingly practicing in such traditional long-term care settings as nursing homes and in less traditional ones such as rehabilitation units, day centers, partial hospitaliza-tion programs, and hospices. The practice of psychology in long-term care is strongly influenced by public policy issues relating to Medicare, such as conditions of reimbursement, the rise of managed Medicare, and the continued disparity between payment for mental health and medical diagnoses. Ceropsychologists must be flexible in the form of their healthcare delivery to continue to provide quality services. The following articles in this special section on long-term care summarize the research on assessment and interventions for long-term care patients, outline the training opportunities available, and provide a decision-making framework for the common professional ethical/legal issues encountered in long-term care settings.     

Hybrid Research Models: Natural Opportunities for Examining Mental Health in Context

The articles in this series promote hybrid research models to bridge the gap between efficacy and effectiveness. We suggest that efforts such as those described in these articles are long overdue. Given the enormous public health consequences of the lack of available and effective mental health services, we no longer can afford research that neglects the natural state of affairs or that leaves others to translate research into practice. It is time to acknowledge that the process of testing interventions in the university for transfer to the community is neither efficient nor empirically justified. Guided by the articles in this series, we focus on the ways in which hybrid models can provide natural opportunities to advance the field and lead to a new generation of research that is both contextually relevant and methodologically rigorous. An iterative process of research and practice is proposed that can lead to stronger theories and methods and enhanced understanding of mental health in context.     

Clinical trials versus mental health services research: contributions and connections

The growing emphasis on using empirical data to guide mental health policy decision making has contributed, in part, to a developing dichotomy along the continuum of research on mental health interventions. At one end of the continuum is research on the efficacy of mental health interventions, traditionally referred to as clinical trials research. The goal of clinical trials research is to determine whether or not a specific intervention can be shown to be efficacious for a specific problem. At the other end of the continuum is research on the implementation and evaluation of mental health interventions, traditionally referred to as mental health services research. The goals of mental health services research are to understand the access to, organization and financing of, and outcomes of mental health interventions. The conceptual, methodological, and measurement features of both types of research are presented and suggestions are offered to bridge the gap between the two paradigms. The purpose of this article is to highlight each discipline's unique contributions to mental health research and, in so doing, facilitate a discussion that fosters scientific integration and collaboration between clinical trials and mental health services investigators.     

Commentary: Studying Usual Care in Child and Adolescent Therapy: It's Anything but Routine

Efforts to enhance the quality of mental health care provided to children and youth require an understanding of the nature and impact of existing clinical services. The Practice and Research: Advancing Collaboration (PRAC) study described by Garland, Hurlburt, and Hawley (2006) is currently documenting the diverse treatment practices used in community settings. The study reflects the use of a hybrid design that integrates methods commonly used in treatment outcome and services research paradigms. This article discusses some of the key issues, directions, and challenges associated with efforts designed to enhance the quality of usual care illustrated in their article. Suggestions are made to encourage integrative investigations in the context of practice-based research networks devoted to promoting effective child and adolescent treatment.     

Behavioral Health Services in Primary Care: A New Perspective for Treating Depression

This article attempts to provide information, inspiration, and practical guidelines for mental health professionals who want to work with primary care providers. Depression is an ideal initial focus in starting primary care behavioral services because (1) the majority of currently available efficacy studies on primary care behavioral hearth interventions concern depression and (2) depression is highly prevalent in the primary care setting. Several large clinical trials indicate that on-site mental health services help primary care providers improve quality of care to depressed primary care patients. This article examines five key questions and suggests two service delivery models to help mental health providers plan initiatives that Integrate medical and behavioral health care in the primary care setting.     

Mental Health Needs of Older Adults and Primary Care: Opportunity for Interdisciplinary Geriatric Team Practice

The convergence of a number of disparate factors has led to opportunities to help address the mental health needs of older adults in primary care (PC) or "integrated care" settings. Older adults are disproportionately high users of health care resources, and cost projections for coming decades have catastrophic implications. Elders shun mental health services, instead turning to their personal physicians when troubled. The PC system is clogged with patients without medical problems or whose medical conditions are exacerbated by psychosocial factors (estimated at 60% to 70%), resulting in overutilization of services and high costs. However, PC physicians detect and adequately treat or refer only 40% to 50% of patients with mental health problems. Early experience with brief and/or structured interventions in PC settings is promising and suggests opportunities for multidisciplinary team geriatric practice.     

Commentary: A Practical Guide for Translating Basic Research on Affective Science to Implementing Physiology in Clinical Child and Adolescent Assessments

The National Institute of Mental Health recently launched the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). RDoC is a framework that facilitates the dimensional assessment and classification of processes relevant to mental health (e.g., affect, regulation, cognition, social affiliation), as reflected in measurements across multiple units of analysis (e.g., physiology, circuitry, genes, self-reports). A key focus of RDoC involves opening new lines of research examining patients’ responses on biological measures, with the key goal of developing new therapeutic techniques that effectively target mechanisms of mental disorders. Yet applied researchers and practitioners rarely use biological measures within mental health assessments, which may present challenges in translating RDoC-guided research into improvements in patient care. Thus, if RDoC is to result in research that yields clinical tools that reduce the burden of mental illness and improve public health, we ought to develop strategies for effectively implementing biological measures in the context of clinical assessments. In this special issue, we sought to provide an initial step in this direction by assembling a collection of articles from leading research teams carrying out pioneering work on implementing multimodal assessments (biological, subjective, behavioral) of affective processes in applied settings. In this commentary, we expand upon the work presented in this special issue by making a series of suggestions for how to most parsimoniously conduct multimodal assessments of affective processes in applied research and clinical settings. We hope that this approach will facilitate translations of the RDoC framework into applied research and clinic settings.     

The mental health professions: workforce supply and demand, issues, and challenges

The U.S. mental health (MH) workforce is comprised of core disciplines: psychology, psychiatry, social work, psychiatric nursing, and marriage and family therapy. A broader group of practitioners also deserves recognition. Diverse professions provide significant services in a variety of settings, extending the de facto mental health workforce. A tally of key disciplines estimates there are 537,857 MH professionals, or 182 per 100,000 U.S. population. This article provides an overview of the need and demand for mental health services and summarizes the MH professions (e.g., training, educational credentials, workforce estimates). It also discusses a range of challenges confronting MH professionals and the need for greater understanding of the workforce and integration of services. Methodological factors that confound estimates of the magnitude of the MH workforce are reviewed.     

Future Directions for the Implementation and Dissemination of Statewide Developmental-Behavioral Pediatric Integrated Health Care

The integration of mental health and pediatric health care services has long been a goal for both research and practice. With the advent of federal policies developed to mandate clinical efficiency across the health care spectrum, this issue is becoming more salient. Applied literature on this topic is only recently emerging, however, and there are limited contextual examples to guide program development, research, and refinement. This article presents background information relevant to the development of such a program (the Center for Advancement of Youth). The cultural and organizational contexts for the project are discussed, with particular emphasis on models for cooperation among several institutions of varying size and scope. The implications for the future of tangible research in this area are also discussed, with attention to extending lessons learned to diverse settings motivated to integrate various aspects of health care service provision.     

Future Directions for Dissemination and Implementation Science: Aligning Ecological Theory and Public Health to Close the Research to Practice Gap

Dissemination and implementation science (DI) has evolved as a major research model for children's mental health in response to a long-standing call to integrate science and practice and bridge the elusive research to practice gap. However, to address the complex and urgent needs of the most vulnerable children and families, future directions for DI require a new alignment of ecological theory and public health to provide effective, sustainable, and accessible mental health services. We present core principles of ecological theory to emphasize how contextual factors impact behavior and allow for the reciprocal impact individuals have on the settings they occupy, and an alignment of these principles with a public health model to ensure that services span the prevention to intervention continuum. We provide exemplars from our ongoing work in urban schools and a new direction for research to address the mental health needs of immigrant Latino families. Through these examples we illustrate how DI can expand its reach by embedding within natural settings to build on local capacity and indigenous resources, incorporating the local knowledge necessary to more substantively address long-standing mental health disparities. This paradigm shift for DI, away from an overemphasis on promoting program adoption, calls for fitting interventions within settings that matter most to children's healthy development and for utilizing and strengthening available community resources. In this way, we can meet the challenge of addressing our nation's mental health burden by supporting the needs and values of families and communities within their own unique social ecologies.     

RIPPLE EFFECTS OF IMPLEMENTING EVIDENCE‐BASED MENTAL HEALTH INTERVENTIONS IN A COMMUNITY‐BASED SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATION

Concerns over the quality of mental health services in the United States have led to the creation, dissemination, and implementation of evidence‐based mental health interventions (EBMHIs). Though it is widely acknowledged that interventions have ripple effects, the effects of these interventions on the systems in which they are implemented (i.e., practice settings) are unclear. The purpose of this qualitative pilot study was to explore both practitioner‐ and organization‐level ripple effects of EBMHIs implemented in a community‐based agency. We identified 4 categories of effects on practitioners (work roles and responsibilities, knowledge, thoughts and feelings, and behavior and communication) and 2 categories of effects on the organization (structure, programming). Findings suggest that it is possible to identify ripple effects through qualitative interviews. Implications for future research on mental health intervention effects are discussed.     

A Partly Built Bridge Between Science and Services: Commentary on the Hawaii Empirical Basis to Services Task Force

There is an emerging consensus on the need to improve mental health services by better use of empirically based services, services that have been validated as effective in well designed studies. However, there is currently little guidance for policy-makers and clinicians about which services for which individuals are empirically based—and even less guidance on how to implement such services. The Hawaii Empirical Basis to Services Task Force was a broad-based effort to develop guidelines for services to children considering the available research. This article reviews and critiques the Task Force's work, finding it a great contribution to the field. However, the Task Force's contribution is also sharply limited by inadequacies in current research, especially in considering the relevance and utility of empirically based interventions to the real world problems of children and contexts for their care.     

Enhancing Mental Health Service Delivery to Ethnically Diverse Populations: Introduction to the Special Series

The American Psychological Association's adoption of guidelines for providing psychological services to diverse populations and the enactment by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of regulations that required the representation of women and ethnic minorities in NIH-funded research projects called attention to the need to improve mental health services for ethnically diverse populations. This special series illustrates the relevance of cultural and ethnic factors in addressing contemporary mental health needs and the role of these factors in the work of clinicians who serve ethnically diverse clinical populations. The articles comprising the series examine the mental health dimensions of five contemporary clinical practice issues: HIV/AIDS, eating disorders, hate crimes, folk healing, and youth at high risk for drug abuse.     

Ethical Challenges in Community-Based Research: Introduction to the Series

We describe the inspiration for this series of articles and articulate several themes that run throughout the four articles that follow. Particular ethical challenges in community-based mental health research are identified, as is the tension between existing ethical codes and policies and the requirements of more collaborative, community-based research. We edited this special series with an eye toward promoting greater discussion of ethical issues in this realm and the eventual development and promotion of guidelines for ethical decision-making in community-based research.     

The role of health care communication in the development of complementary and integrative medicine

In recent years, complementary medicine (CM) approaches are integrated within a growing number of health care services worldwide. Implementation of CM within primary, secondary and tertiary settings of health care requires attention to a variety of communication challenges. In this special issue of Patient Education and Counseling 23 articles are presented about the patient–provider communication on complementary approaches, and the implementation and integration of CM in health care. Parallel to CM integration in the clinical arena, this special issue emphasizes the importance of two complementary axes: in medical education and in research, particularly on management of chronic illness and life-threatening diseases. The three legs of the integrative stool – research, education, and clinical practice – are perceived in the light of open, non-judgmental patient–health care provider–CM practitioner communication and a patient-centered bio-psycho-social–cultural–spiritual agenda.     

New directions and resources in group psychotherapy: introduction to the issue

Establishing an evidence-based practice (EBP) is a central byproduct of the ever-increasing emphasis on accountability in mental health services. Though much has been written and developed for individual psychotherapists who wish to develop EBPs, there are far fewer resources for group psychotherapists. This article introduces a series of articles designed to provide EBPs and resources for group psychotherapists. We discuss how therapists can develop and apply the following aspects of EBPs: research-supported treatments (RSTs), practice guidelines, practice-based evidence, and multicultural competence.