Effect of moist vs. dry bonding to normal vs. caries-affected dentin with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus.

Recent research in dentin bonding demonstrated the superiority of moist bonding over dry bonding on normal dentin, but it is unclear if this technique is also superior in bonding to caries-affected dentin. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the SEM appearance and bond strength of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SMPP) to normal vs. caries-affected dentin bonded under moist vs. dry conditions, with and without polyalkenoic acid in the primer. Extracted carious human third molars were ground down by means of 600-grit SiC paper until the carious dentin no longer stained with caries detector solution. The flat surfaces were then primed, bonded, and built up with resin composite. After soaking in water for 1 day, the teeth were serially sectioned vertically into 5 or 6 slabs 0.7 mm thick. The bonded caries-affected areas were isolated by means of an ultrafine diamond bur to create an hourglass configuration with a cross-sectional area of 0.9 mm2. Bonded normal dentin was isolated the same way. Each specimen was attached to a Bencor device and tested in tension to failure. SMPP bonds to dry, normal dentin were only half as strong (21+/-10 MPa, x +/- SD) as those made to moist, normal dentin (42+/-9 MPa, p<0.01). There was no significant difference between bonds made to normal vs. caries-affected dentin by means of the moist technique (42+/-9 vs. 48+/-4 MPa, respectively). Removal of the polyalkenoic acid from the primer lowered (p<0.05) the bond strength of SMPP to caries-affected dentin (38+/-8 MPa). The benefits of moist bonding extend to caries-affected dentin. The polyalkenoic acid in the SMPP primer contributes to the high bond strength that can be achieved to caries-affected dentin.     

Shear bond strength of Scotchbond in vivo

The shear bond strengths of Scotchbond, HEMA/Scotchbond, and Scotchbond 2 were measured in vivo in dog canine and molar enamel and dentin. Dentin bond strengths were compared in superficial, middle, and deep dentin. The acid-etched enamel bond strengths of the three bonding systems ranged from 10 to 11 MPa and were not statistically different. Scotchbond/Silux bonds to superficial and middle cuspid and molar dentin were 3 MPa and were not statistically different. HEMA-treated dentin did not consistently improve Scotchbond strengths to either tooth type at any dentin depth. Deep dentin from either tooth type yielded significantly lower bond strengths. Scotchbond 2/Silux shear bond strengths were significantly higher (6-8 MPa) in superficial and middle cuspid dentin but were not different from Scotchbond bonds made to deep cuspid dentin or to any depth of molar dentin. The observation that molar bond strengths are lower than those made to cuspid dentin indicates that there are important substrate differences between teeth as well as within dentin as a function of depth. The dog model may be useful for the screening of new dentin bonding systems prior to clinical trials.     

Effect of bonding variables on the shear bond strength and interfacial morphology of a one-bottle adhesive

This study's objectives were: 1) to determine the combination of bonding procedures (with or without acid etching, moist or dry substrate, one or two applications of primer/adhesive) that would produce the highest shear bond strength of Prime & Bond and Dyract AP and 2) to characterize the resin-dentin/enamel interface produced by these bonding procedures. Ninety-six bovine incisors were randomly assigned to eight groups for shear bond testing to enamel (n = 6) and dentin (n = 6). Prime & Bond and Dyract AP were applied and cured following manufacturers' instructions. Shear bond testing was conducted in a Universal Testing Machine. Thirty-two bovine incisors were sectioned to produce blocks with enamel and dentin, then bonded in pairs for evaluation of interfacial morphology. They were polished and argon ion-etched using a high-speed argon ion-etching machine and examined by SEM. The groups where enamel was etched, kept moist or dry and received a single application of Prime & Bond produced the highest shear bond strength. Dentin bond strengths were high in the groups where dentin was etched and kept moist. The number of Prime & Bond applications had no effect on dentin bond strength. Acid etching results in better adaptation of Prime & Bond to enamel and dentin regardless of whether moisture is present.     

The use of flowable composites as filled adhesives.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of filled adhesives on bonding resin composites to dentin has not been fully understood. Due to their filler content, filled adhesives may act as stress breakers. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the use of flowable composites of different viscosities on bonding to enamel and dentin without the use of an intermediate bonding resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enamel and dentin bond strengths of OptiBond FL, Syntac Classic, and EBS Multi combined either with their proprietary bonding agent or a flowable resin composite (Ultraseal XT Plus or Revolution) were measured. The tests were carried out with a microtensile device at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min after 24h of storage at 37 degrees C in water. Mean bond strengths were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test and multiple comparisons according to the Mann-Whitney U-test. The micro-morphology of corresponding resin-dentin interfaces of the same teeth were analyzed using SEM and TEM. RESULTS: The control groups with adhesive systems used as per manufacturers' protocol showed bond strengths of 38.9-41.1 MPa to enamel and 28.8-33.4 MPa to dentin. With respect to bond strength to etched enamel, only Ultraseal XT Plus as bonding resin reached the level of the control groups. When used as bonding agents on dentin, both flowable composites produced lower microtensile bond strengths to etched and primed dentin than did the control groups. Micro-morphological analysis using SEM and TEM resulted in hybrid layer formation for both control and experimental groups. However, many areas of the resin-dentin interface showed insufficient penetration of the flowable composites at the top of the hybrid layer as well as numerous tubules obstructed by filler particles. CONCLUSIONS: The flowable composites tested in this study should not be used to replace bonding agents. Flowable composites of thinner viscosity, such as Ultraseal XT Plus, may bond to enamel adequately without the requirement of an intermediate bonding resin.     

The effect on shear bond strength of rewetting dry dentin with two desensitizers

The difficulty related to achieving a balance between wet and dry dentin makes the dentin bonding technique extremely sensitive. This study evaluated the effect of rewetting dried dentin with two commercial desensitizing agents (Protect and HurriSeal) on the dentin shear bond strength of three total-etch dentin bonding agents (Syntac Single-Component, OptiBond Solo Plus and Prime & Bond NT) and compared both to applying these same bonding agents to moist dentin and dry dentin. Each bonding agent was paired with an appropriate resin composite from the same manufacturer (Table 1). Recently extracted, formalin-treated caries-free human molars were used. The occlusal surface of each tooth was ground to create a flat dentin surface. Then, each tooth was mounted in acrylic. Twelve groups (n = 15) were prepared: 1) Syntac Single-Component with Heliomolar resin composite (SSC/H) to moist dentin; 2) SSC/H to dry dentin; 3) SSC/H to dried dentin rewet with Protect; 4) SSC/H to dried dentin rewet with HurriSeal; 5) OptiBond Solo Plus with Point 4 resin composite (OBS+/P4) to moist dentin; 6) OBS+/P4 to dry dentin; 7) OBS+/P4 to dried dentin rewet with Protect; 8) OBS+/P4 to dried dentin rewet with HurriSeal; 9) Prime & Bond NT with TPH Spectrum resin composite (PBNT/TPH) to moist dentin; 10) PBNT/TPH to dry dentin; 11) PBNT/THP to dried dentin rewet with Protect and 12) PBNT/TPH to dried dentin rewet with HurriSeal. Groups 1, 5 and 9 were placed according to manufacturers' instructions (moist dentin) as control groups. All the other groups received a 15-second air blast after etching and prior to applying the one bottle adhesive or desensitizer and one bottle adhesive. Resin composite cylinders [4 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height] were then placed. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours prior to thermocycling 2,500 times (at 8 degrees C and 48 degrees C). Shear bond strengths (SBSs) were measured one week after fabrication by using a circular knife-edge and crosshead speeds of 0.5 mm/minute. Failure modes of debonded specimens were determined under a stereomicroscope (30x). Failed specimens with the low and high shear bond strengths in each group were evaluated under a low vacuum Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM-LV). One-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests were used to compare the different conditions for each bonding system. In the Syntac Single-Component bonding agent groups, there was no significant difference in shear bond strength between the control (15.73 MPa), dry (18.11 MPa) and HurriSeal (16.18 MPa) specimens. Protect specimens showed significantly lower shear bond strength (6.39 MPa). In the OptiBond Solo Plus bonding agent groups, there was no significant difference between the control (20.79 MPa) and the HurriSeal (21.29 MPa) groups, and both groups had significantly greater bonds than the dry (14.13MPa) and Protect (9.57 MPa) groups. In the Prime & Bond NT bonding agent groups, the shear bond strength of the HurriSeal group (20.73 MPa) was significantly higher than the other groups: control (8.05 MPa), dry (5.73 MPa) and Protect (5.45 MPa).     

Effect of carbamide peroxide bleaching on the shear bond strength of composite to dental bonding agent enhanced enamel

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Carbamide peroxide bleaching has been implicated in adversely affecting the bond strength of composite to enamel. PURPOSE: This in vitro study evaluated the effect of 3 dental bonding agents (OptiBond, All-Bond 2, One-Step) on the shear bond strength of a hybrid composite to enamel which was treated by a 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cylinders of composite were bonded to carbamide peroxide-treated enamel on extracted human teeth using 3 dental bonding agents. After thermocycling, shear bond strengths were determined with a universal testing machine. RESULTS: OptiBond aided bond strengths were 23.7 +/- 5.6 MPa to bleached and 19.6 +/- 2.9 MPa to unbleached enamel. For All-Bond 2, bleached enamel exhibited bond strengths of 14.9 +/- 4.0 MPa and unbleached enamel exhibited a bond strength value of 20. 4 +/- 2.3 MPa. The composite bond strength for One-Step was 13.6 +/- 5.9 MPa to bleached and 23.0 +/- 3.9 MPa to unbleached enamel. There was no statistical difference between OptiBond (alcohol base) aided bond strengths for bleached and unbleached enamel; however, the bond strength of composite to bleached enamel with All-Bond 2 or One-Step (acetone base) was significantly lower than unbleached controls. CONCLUSION: The effect of bonding agent usage on composite bond strength to enamel bleached with a particular carbamide peroxide was dependent on the bonding agent used.     

Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study compared the dentin bonding performance of eight adhesive systems using a microtensile bond strength test. METHODS: Thirty bovine teeth were ground to 600-grit to obtain flat root-dentin surfaces. Two conventional adhesive systems (Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus, OptiBond FL), four one-step adhesive systems (Scotchbond 1, Asba S.A.C., Prime and Bond NT, Excite) and two self-etching adhesive materials (Clearfil Liner Bond 2 V and Prompt L-Pop) were evaluated. Each bonding system was applied according to manufacturer's instructions and followed by composite (Z100) application. Immediately after bonding, the teeth were prepared for microtensile testing. Bond strength to dentin was measured using a Vitrodyne V-1000 universal tester. There were 14 replicates for each material. Fractured specimens were further observed by SEM. RESULTS: Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus exhibited significantly (p<0.05) higher bond strength values (30.3+/-9.4 MPa) than all other materials. The bond strengths of the other materials were (from highest to lowest): Opitbond FL (22.4+/-4.3 MPa); Scotchbond 1(18.9+/-3.2); Clearfil Liner Bond 2 V (18.9+/-3.0); Prime and Bond NT (18.3+/-6.9); Asba S.A.C. (14.4+/-2.9); Excite (13.8+/-3.7); and Prompt L-Pop (9.1+/-3.3). Statistical comparisons frequently overlapped, but Optibond was significantly (p<0.05) greater than Asba, Excite, and Prompt L-Pop; whereas, Scotchbond 1 was only significantly (p<0.05) greater than Prompt L-Pop. Asba, Excite and Prompt L-Pop were not significantly different. The fracture modes were mostly adhesive. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional adhesive systems produced higher bond strengths to root dentin than most one-step adhesives and one self-etching adhesive; with the exception of one material in each respective system.     

Shear Bond Strengths of One-Bottle Adhesives to Moist Enamel

Abstract: Purpose: This study evaluated bond strengths of six one-bottle bonding agents and a control (primer plus unfilled resin) to moist enamel.
Materials and Methods: One-hundred and five bovine teeth were randomly assigned to seven groups of 15. Enamel was etched for 15 seconds with 35% phosphoric acid. Etched enamel was rinsed, and excess water was blotted with tissue paper. Following application of the adhesive, composite resin was bonded using a gelatin capsule technique. Shear bond strengths to enamel were determined using a universal testing machine (Instron Corp., Canton, Massachusetts).
Results: Mean bond strengths ranged from 21.9 MPa for OptiBond Solo (Kerr Corp., Orange, California) to 29.6 MPa for Prime & Bond 2.1 (Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, Delaware). Prime & Bond 2.1 had a significantly higher mean bond strength than the other adhesives.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study suggest that all of the one-bottle systems tested should provide clinically acceptable bonding to moist enamel.     

Shear bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives to moist enamel.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated bond strengths of six one-bottle bonding agents and a control (primer plus unfilled resin) to moist enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred and five bovine teeth were randomly assigned to seven groups of 15. Enamel was etched for 15 seconds with 35% phosphoric acid. Etched enamel was rinsed, and excess water was blotted with tissue paper. Following application of the adhesive, composite resin was bonded using a gelatin capsule technique. Shear bond strengths to enamel were determined using a universal testing machine (Instron Corp., Canton, Massachusetts). RESULTS: Mean bond strengths ranged from 21.9 MPa for OptiBond Solo (Kerr Corp., Orange, California) to 29.6 MPa for Prime & Bond 2.1 (Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, Delaware). Prime & Bond 2.1 had a significantly higher mean bond strength than the other adhesives. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study suggest that all of the one-bottle systems tested should provide clinically acceptable bonding to moist enamel.     

Effect of cross-sectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine the effect of the bonding area on the micro-shear and micro-tensile bond strengths of four dentin adhesive systems (Scotchbond MP Plus, 3M Dental Products, St. Paul, MN; OptiBond FL, Kerr Corp., Orange, CA; OptiBond Solo, Kerr Corp., Orange, CA; One-Step, Bisco, Inc., Itasca, IL). METHODS: Sixty extracted human molars were cut vertically and occlusal enamel removed, one half of the tooth was used for tensile testing and one half for shear. The occlusal dentin was bonded according to manufacturers' directions with a resin composite block and sectioned to obtain up to three square bar-shaped specimens, which were shaped with a high speed diamond bur on a lathe to produce cylindrical specimens of 1.2, 1.4 or 2.0 mm diameter at the bonded interface. The bonds were stressed in shear or tension at a crosshead speed of 1 mm min-1. The mean bond strengths were compared using one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA and Student's t-test. The fractured surfaces were examined under a scanning electron microscope and the frequency of fracture modes was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: For all materials, the 2.0 mm diameter group showed significantly lower bond strengths than the 1.2 mm diameter group in both shear and tensile tests (p < 0.05). Most specimens of 1.2 mm or 1.4 mm diameter exhibited adhesive failure at the interface between the dentin and the adhesive resin. SIGNIFICANCE: The results indicate that small surface areas of test specimens are associated with higher bond strengths and that the effect on tensile and shear values is similar.     

Influence of dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fiber posts and three dentin regions within a post space

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Debonding is the most frequent failure encountered with translucent fiber posts and usually occurs along the post space dentin-adhesive interface. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fiber posts and root dentin in different regions of the post space. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty maxillary canines with similar root lengths were selected, sectioned at the cemento-enamel junction, and the roots were endodontically treated. Following post space preparation, the roots were divided into 4 groups of 10 specimens each, and the post spaces were treated with 1 of 4 different dentin bonding agents: light-polymerized, single-bottle bonding agent Excite (Group EX); dual-polymerized, single-bottle bonding agent Excite DSC (Group EX-DSC); self-etching primer Clearfil Liner Bond 2V with a light-polymerized bonding agent, Bond A (Group CL-LC); or self-etching primer Clearfil Liner Bond 2V with a dual-polymerized bonding agent, Bond A+B (Group CL-DC). Translucent fiber posts (D.T. Light-Post), 2.2 mm in diameter, were luted (Panavia F) in each specimen after respective dentin bonding procedures. The roots were cut into 3-mm-thick sections, perpendicular to the long-axis in cervical, middle, and apical post space dentin. Push-out tests were performed with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, and bond strength values (MPa) were calculated by dividing the force at which bond failure occurred by the bonded area of the post. The data were analyzed with 1- and 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparison tests (alpha=.05). Dentin adhesive bonding mechanisms in different regions of the post spaces were evaluated with a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The highest mean bond strength values were obtained for Group CL-LC (18.3 +/- 4.1 MPa). The dual-polymerized bonding agent resulted in significantly lower bond strength (P<.001) in combination with self-etching primer (Group CL-DC) (13.2 +/- 2.5 MPa). The light-polymerized and dual-polymerized single-bottle bonding agents provided similar bond strengths (12.7 +/- 5.0 for EX; 13.5 +/- 5.3 for EX-DSC). The regional bond strength values of single-bottle bonding agents were reduced significantly in apical post space dentin (P<.001). Self-etching primers did not demonstrate regional differences in post space dentin bonding and dense resin tags were apparent. CONCLUSION: Data suggests that the self-etching primer system used in this study was unaffected by the morphological variations in the post space dentin compared to the single-bottle bonding agents. Dual polymerization did not improve the bond strength values of the bonding agents tested.     

Resin bonding to wet substrate. II. Bonding to enamel.

In part I of this study, it was reported that high shear bond strengths to dentin were obtained by using a particular dentin-enamel bonding system on wet dentin. Because it would be difficult to dry the enamel without drying the dentin, an investigation was undertaken to determine if the treatment of enamel surfaces with various phosphoric acid concentrations would be successful on wet enamel using the same bonding system. It was discovered that the bond strengths to etched and wet enamel using a particular dentin-enamel bonding system were equal to or higher than bond strengths to etched and dry enamel.     

喷磨预处理对离体氟斑牙正畸托槽粘接强度的影响

目的筛选一种使氟斑牙与托槽有较高粘接强度的临床可行的粘接方法。方法选择15例氟斑牙正畸患者拔除的60颗第一前磨牙为研究对象,采用随机区组设计方法分为15个区组,每区组包括每位患者的4颗牙齿,区组内采用随机排列表法分为A、B、C、D 4小组,每小组即包括每位患者的1颗牙齿,共计15颗。4小组采用不同方法粘接托槽,分别为常规酸蚀后用釉质粘接剂粘接、喷磨预处理后用釉质粘接剂粘接、自酸蚀后用Bond粘接剂和光固化复合树脂粘接、喷磨预处理和自酸蚀后用树脂粘接剂和光固化复合树脂粘接;然后测定4小组的粘接强度和托槽底面粘接剂的余留情况。结果A、B、C、D 4小组的托槽/牙面剪切强度测试结果分别为（2.247±0.261）MPa、（5.374±0.469）MPa、（4.345±0.401）MPa、（5.791±0.636）MPa,4组间存在统计学差异（P<0.01）,D组剪切强度最大,其次为B、C组,A组最小。4组样本在去除托槽时残留粘接剂的情况无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论氟斑牙面先用空气喷磨机喷磨,然后进行自酸蚀和树脂粘接托槽是一种较为可行的方法。     

In vitro comparison of 10-minute versus 24-hour shear bond strengths of six dentin bonding systems.

OBJECTIVE: Early bond strengths produced by dentin bonding systems should be sufficient to resist the polymerization shrinkage of resin composite. This study compared the 10-minute and 24-hour shear bond strengths of six dentin bonding systems: One-Step (OS), PermaQuik (PQ), Prime & Bond 2.1 (PB), Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBMP), Single Bond (SB), and Tenure Quik with Fluoride (TQ). METHOD AND MATERIALS: Each bonding system was used to bond composite to visibly moist dentin at 34 degrees C +/- 2 degrees C. The specimens were debonded at 37 degrees C +/- 1 degree C 10 minutes after the start of light curing of the bonding system, and the results were compared with the 24-hour bond strengths. The mode of failure was recorded. RESULTS: The 10-minute mean shear bond strengths were: OS, 16.4; PQ, 14.3; SB, 14.0; PB, 12.7; TQ, 10.7; and SBMP, 9.3 MPa. The 24-hour mean shear bond strengths were OS, 23.3; PB, 20.8; SB, 20.3; PQ, 19.4; TQ, 11.2; and SBMP, 10.0 MPa. The 10-minute mean shear bond strengths of OS, PQ, PB, and SB bonding systems were significantly less than the 24-hour values. More dentinal fractures and mixed failures were observed with OS, PQ, and PB. Systems with higher bond strengths had more resin penetration into the lateral dentinal branches. CONCLUSION: The 10-minute mean shear bond strengths were all less than 17 MPa, and the 10-minute bond strengths were less than the 24-hour values.     

Shear bond strengths of ten dentin adhesive systems.

This in vitro study tested the shear bond strengths of nine third-generation dentin bonding systems. All of these systems had higher bond strengths than the control, a second-generation agent. Amalgambond and All-Bond had the strongest bonds to dentin, 23.3 +/- 5.7 and 19.3 +/- 5.6 MPa, respectively. Clearfil Photo Bond and Prisma Universal Bond 3 had intermediate bond strengths (approximately 13 MPa). Gluma, PowerBond, Scotchbond 2, Tenure, and XR-Bond all had mean shear bond strengths of less than 8 MPa.     

The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the cross-sectional area shape (cylindrical vs. rectangular) and the bonding surface area on the microtensile bond strengths and stress distribution of four dentin adhesive systems (Scotchbond MP Plus, OptiBond FL, OptiBond Solo, One-Step). In addition, finite element analysis (FEA) models were developed to investigate stress distributions. METHODS: Extracted human molars were cut vertically and the occlusal enamel removed; one-half of the tooth was used for rectangular specimens, the other half for cylindrical specimens. The occlusal dentin was bonded according to the manufacturers' directions and covered with a block of resin composite. For the cylindrical specimens, the bonded dentin was shaped with a diamond bur on a lathe to produce specimens of area 1.1, 1.5 or 3.1 mm2 at the bonded interface. The rectangular specimens were sectioned to obtain bar-shaped specimens, which were shaped to produce hour-glass shaped specimens with the same area as the round specimens. Bonds were stressed in tension at a speed of 1 mm min-1. The mean bond strengths were compared using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, LSD and Student's t tests. The fractured surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy, and the frequencies of the fracture modes were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. FEA models were created simulating the cross-sectional areas for bonding to determine the stress distribution. RESULTS: The 3.1 mm2 bonding area groups showed significantly lower bond strengths than the 1.1 mm2 bonding area groups (p < 0.05), except for the rectangular specimens using Scotchbond MP Plus and One-Step. Most cylindrical specimens of bonding area 1.1 or 1.5 mm2 exhibited adhesive failure at the interface between the dentin and the adhesive resin. No differences were determined between cylindrical and rectangular specimens. The fracture mode matched the stress distribution patterns calculated from the FEA modeling. SIGNIFICANCE: The results indicate that the test methods using small surface areas produce higher bond strengths than those using larger surface areas, and that cross-sectional shape has little effect. This is probably a result of fewer defects occurring in the small-area specimens.     

Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium:YAG laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the in vitro effect of the Er:YAG laser and high-speed rotary instrumentation on the bond strength of resin composite to human enamel and dentin, and determine which conditioner, either phosphoric acid or a self-etching primer, resulted in higher bond strengths with either of the surface treatments. METHODS: 48 third molars were used. Dentin and enamel specimens were sectioned and polished with 600-grit SiC paper and treated either with carbide bur or an Erbium:YAG laser and treated with one of three different conditions, acid-etch/bonding agent (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus), no etching and same bonding agent, and an experimental self-etching primer (EXL 547). After storage for 48 hours at 37 degrees C and 100% humidity, specimens were prepared in an hourglass shape for microtensile bond test (ca. 1 mm2) and debonded in tension. Areas were measured and bond strengths were calculated for each specimen. Failure modes, micromorphology of surface treatments and bonding interfaces of representative specimens from acid-etched and self-etched groups were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy. Means were compared using three-way analysis of variance, and Scheffé post-hoc test (P < 0.05) was used to determine differences among surface treatments, tooth substrate and conditioners. RESULTS: Dentin prepared with the carbide bur and treated with phosphoric acid followed by the application of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose had the highest bond strengths (35.7 MPa). Enamel and dentin prepared with the Er:YAG laser had the highest bond strengths when the surfaces were acid-etched followed by Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (25.8-21.1 MPa). Carbide bur exhibited higher bond strengths than laser with the use of the experimental self-etching primer but laser showed higher bond strengths than the bur with the use of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and no etching. The predominant failure mode of most of the treatment conditions was partially adhesive between the bonding resin and enamel or dentin, and partially cohesive within the bonding resin. SEM analysis revealed the absence of a smear layer on laser-treated teeth when compared to untreated control and bur-cut teeth.     

The bonding of composite resin to moist enamel

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect on the bond strength of modern dentine bonding agents to etched enamel of surface contamination with water. DESIGN: Fifteen bond strength measurements were made for bonds prepared to both moist and dry etched enamel for each of three test and one control materials. RESULTS: For two materials (Scotchbond 1 and Prime and Bond 2.1) the bond strength was not affected by the presence of water on the etched enamel surface. A mean bond strength in excess of 25 MPa was achieved for both materials under all conditions. One material (Optibond Solo) showed a 30% increase in bond strength when bonds were formed under wet condition (21.10 MPa compared with 15.35 MPa). The bond strength of the control material, a conventional unfilled bonding resin, decreased markedly with aqueous contamination (9.14 MPa compared with 26.75 MPa). CONCLUSION: Etched enamel should be rehydrated routinely prior to bonding composite resin to its surface using a water displacing dentine bonding system.     

Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic moisture on bond strength to dentine

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effects of simulated pulpal pressure (PP) and moist bonding (MB) on the shear bond strength of three different dentine bonding systems (DBSs). METHODS: Dentine surfaces were exposed on 120 extracted human molars and bonded with one out of three restorative systems (A. R.T. Bond/Brilliant, OptiBond FL/Herculite XRV, Scotchbond 1/Z100). In one-half of the specimens, the DBSs were applied under hydrostatic pulpal pressure of 30 cm H2O (PP). Forty specimens were prepared for each DBS according to the following experimental groups (each n=10): no PP/no MB; with PP/no MB; no PP/with MB; with PP/with MB. Shear bond strengths after 24 h were measured in a universal testing machine (Zwicki 1120) and statistically analysed by 2-way ANOVA. Fractured surfaces were investigated for the type of failure under an optical stereomicroscope and by SEM. RESULTS: In all DBSs, pulpal pressure resulted in a decrease of dentinal bond strength. This effect was significant in A.R.T. Bond and OptiBond FL (P<0.001), but not in Scotchbond 1 (P=0.060). Moist bonding significantly increased the bond strength of Scotchbond 1 (P<0.001), significantly decreased the bond strength of A.R.T. Bond (P=0.032), but had no effect in the case of OptiBond FL (P=0.691). In A.R.T. Bond, the combination of hydrostatic pulpal pressure and moist bonding resulted in complete failure of most of the specimens prior to the debonding tests. The fracture patterns as detected by SEM fracture analyses were typical for each DBS and specific bonding condition and consistent with the results of the bond strength measurements. Significance: The results indicate that continuous intrinsic moisture in the form of hydrostatic pulpal pressure adversely affects the efficacy of DBSs, while limited extrinsic moisture by moist bonding is acceptable or even essential. The effect of moist bonding on the efficacy of DBSs seems to depend not only on the monomers used and the solvents per se, but also on the water content of the dentine primer and the self-priming adhesive, respectively.     

Dentin bond strengths of simplified adhesives: effect of dentin depth

The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of 3 simplified adhesive systems applied on shallow vs deep dentin. For superficial dentin, 30 human molars were sectioned with a diamond saw to expose dentin immediately below the dentoenamel junction. For deep dentin, 30 molars were sectioned 3 mm below the dentoenamel junction. The teeth were mounted, polished to 600-grit, and randomly assigned to 3 groups (n=10): Single Bonda and OptiBond Solo, total-etch adhesives, and Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, a self-etching primer adhesive. Adhesives were applied, the restorative material Filtek Z250 inserted in a No. 5 gelatin capsule, and light-cured. After 24 hours in water at 37 degrees C, shear bond strength was measured with an Instron at 5 mm/min. The data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA and Duncan's post-hoc test. The results showed the following shear bond strengths (mean +/- SD in MPa): Single Bond/superficial dentin = 22.1 +/- 2.8; Single Bond/deep dentin = 14.2 +/- 7.0; OptiBond Solo/superficial dentin = 18.9 +/- 4.1; OptiBond Solo/deep dentin = 18.4 +/- 4.8; Clearfil Liner Bond 2V/superficial dentin = 21.0 +/- 7.4; Clearfil Liner Bond 2V/deep dentin = 17.6 +/- 5.9. There were no significant differences between mean shear bond strength for the factor "adhesive system" (P>.822). The Duncan's test showed that Single Bond resulted in higher shear bond strength on superficial dentin than on deep dentin. The mean shear bond strength for Clearfil Liner Bond 2V and OptiBond Solo were not influenced by dentin depth. When data were pooled for dentin depth, deep dentin resulted in statistically lower bond strengths than superficial dentin (P<.01). The influence of dentin depth on shear bond strength depends on the specific composition of the dentin adhesive.