The impact of circular stapler diameter on the incidence of gastrojejunostomy stenosis and weight loss following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Background Gastrojejunostomy stenosis after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a common occurrence. The incidence varies widely among reported series. We evaluated the impact of circular stapler size on the rate of stenosis and weight loss. Methods Our initial technique utilized a 21-mm circular stapler to construct the gastrojejunostomy. We switched to a 25-mm stapler after a large preliminary experience. Stenosis was confirmed by endoscopy in patients complaining of the inability to eat or excessive vomiting, and was defined as a gastrojejunostomy diameter less than that of a therapeutic endoscope (11-mm). Results Stenosis occurred in 23 of 145 patients (15.9%) with a 21-mm gastrojejunostomy. Five of 81 patients with a 25-mm circular stapled anastomosis have developed a stenosis (6.2%, p = 0.03). Weight loss was similar for each sized stapler at 6 and 12 months. Conclusions The use of a 25-mm circular stapler in laparoscopic gastric bypass is preferable to a 21-mm stapler. The larger stapler is associated with a significantly decreased incidence of gastrojejunostomy stenosis without compromising early weight loss.     

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Linear Staplers during Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: The development of laparoscopic linear staplers has enabled minimally invasive approaches to bariatric surgery, but there have been no comparison studies of the two current 6-row devices. We report our experience with a prospective randomized comparison of 6-row linear staplers during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). Methods: From January to March 2003, 100 patients were randomly assigned to undergo LRYGBP with either an Endo-GIA Universal 6-row stapler (USSC) or the ETS-Flex 6-row stapler (Ethicon). Mean preoperative BMI was 49±8 for 50 Endo-GIA patients, and 49±7 for 50 ETS-Flex patients. Parameters measured included quantity of cartridges, handles, hemoclips, estimated blood loss, misfires, OR time, postoperative leaks and bleeds, and cost. Results: Mean follow-up was 135 days (range 90- 180). The ETS-Flex group experienced significantly more misfires (28% vs 2%, P <.001), hemoclips applied (30±9 vs 21±7, P <.001), estimated blood loss (132±56 vs 100±32 ml, P <.001) and OR time (66±19 vs 58±13 mins, P <.02) compared with the Endo-GIA group respectively.There was one postoperative leak associated with the ETS-Flex group and two postoperative bleeds with the Endo-GIA group, which were not a significant differences.The Endo-GIA group averaged $319 more per case for staple cost. Conclusion: While the ETS-Flex stapler was less expensive, it was associated with more technical failures requiring surgeon intervention to reduce potential patient morbidity, compared with the Endo-GIA.     

Comparison of laparoscopic linear staplers in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Only one previous study has evaluated the clinical safety of the 2 laparoscopic linear stapling devices available. Our study compared these staplers using laparoscopic gastric bypass as the standard procedure. METHODS: A total of 400 consecutive patients were prospectively studied. Group A (200 patients) underwent gastric bypass with the Endo-GIA Universal 6-row stapler (Autosuture) used, and group B (200 patients) underwent the procedure with the Ethicon 6-row stapler used. The measured parameters included stapler misfires, staple line bleeding, staple line leaks, unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding, unexplained intra-abdominal bleeding, total bleeding events, and total adverse events. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in preoperative body mass index, age, and gender. Both groups had a single staple line leak (0.5%; P = 1.0). Three (0.25% of staple firings) misfires occurred in group B. No misfires occurred in group A (P = .25). Gastrointestinal bleeding, staple line bleeding, and unexplained intra-abdominal bleeding occurred in 6 (3%), 2 (1%), and 5 (2.5%) patients in group A and in 1 (0.5%), 0 (0%), and 2 (1%) patients in group B (P = .12, P = .5, and P = .45, respectively). Total bleeding events occurred in 13 patients (6.5%) in group A and in 3 patients (1.5%) in group B (P = 0.019). The total number of patients with an adverse event was 14 (7%) in group A and 7 (3.5%) in group B (P = .18). CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that the Ethicon 6-row stapler had more misfires and the Autosuture Endo-GIA 6-row stapler resulted in more bleeding complications. Only the difference in total bleeding events reached statistical significance but the difference in the total number of adverse events was not statistically significant. Therefore, in our experience both devices were equally safe and effective.     

Incidence of gastroenterostomy stenosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using 21- or 25-mm circular stapler: a randomized prospective blinded study

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the most common bariatric procedure performed in the United States today. The most common early complication after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y is stenosis. No randomized studies have compared the effect of the different staplers on the incidence of stenosis or on long-term weight loss. We compared the anastomoses performed with the two sizes of circular stapler in common use. METHODS: A total of 200 patients were randomized to undergo 21-mm (n = 100) or 25-mm (n = 100) circular stapled gastroenterostomy after induction of anesthesia. No other differences were allowed in the operative technique. Stenosis was defined as patient complaints of dysphagia leading to endoscopy within 10 weeks of surgery, in which a 9-mm diameter endoscope would not pass through the gastroenterostomy without dilation. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients, 19 patients in the 21-mm group and 8 in the 25-mm group underwent endoscopy for symptoms (P = 0.027). Of the 19 and 8 patients, 17 and 7, respectively, had measurable stenosis at endoscopy (p = 0.035). Patients with a 21-mm anastomosis developed symptoms an average of 4.8 +/- 1.2 weeks after surgery, and those with a 25-mm anastomosis developed symptoms an average of 8.9 +/- 3.8 weeks postoperatively (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant difference in the stenosis rate between the 21-mm and 25-mm circular stapled anastomoses in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The 21-mm staplers led to significantly more endoscopies than did the 25-mm staplers. Symptoms leading to endoscopy occurred significantly later with use of a 25-mm stapler than after a 21-mm stapler.     

Early Experience with Intraluminal Reinforcement of Stapled Gastrojejunostomy During Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass

Background The use of extraluminal staple-line buttressing material during laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass has shown the potential to reduce staple-line leak and bleeding. We herein present our early experience with intraluminal reinforcement of linear-cutting stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis with the use of bioabsorbable glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement. Methods Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed in 80 consecutive non-randomized morbidly obese patients. Gastrojejunal anastomosis was performed using a linear-cutting stapler without staple-line reinforcement in 40 patients (group A), while in the other 40 patients (group B), gastrojejunostomy was performed using a linear cutting stapler with intraluminal reinforcement material (bioabsorbable glycolide copolymer). Demographic data were collected. The rate of gastrojejunal anastomotic leak, bleeding, and stricture was determined. Results There was a statistically significant reduction in bleeding complications between the two groups (15% bleeding in group A vs. no bleeding in group B, P value = 0.0255). Stricture rate was higher in-group A (10% group A vs. 2.5% in group B); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P value = 0.2007). None of our patients developed a gastrojejunal leak. Conclusion Intraluminal reinforcement of gastrojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic gastric bypass is safe and feasible. The use of intraluminal bioabsorbable glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement significantly reduces the incidence of gastrojejunal bleeding.     

Laparoscopic approach to open gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: Gastric bypass is a successful tool in the treatment of morbid obesity. In recent years, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has gained popularity. However, open bypass is sometimes more suitable for patients who are "superobese." Laparoscopic instrumentation can be used during an open gastric bypass to facilitate dissection, formation of the gastric pouch, and creation of the gastrojejunostomy. METHODS: We describe the use of laparoscopic ultrasonic coagulating shears for dissection during open gastric bypass. Additionally, laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis and end-to-end anastomosis staplers are used for creating bowel anastomoses. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic instrumentation can be useful in the setting of open procedures. Their long handles and jaw design make them ideal for working in the depths of a superobese abdomen.     

Omental Wrap: A Simple Technique for Reinforcement of the Gastrojejunostomy during Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background Anastomotic leak is one of the most dreaded complications following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). A simple technique for reinforcement of the gastrojejunal anastomosis using an omental wrap during laparoscopic RYGBP is described.We recommend this technique particularly in those patients at high risk for gastrojejunal leak. Methods A 20 ml vertically-oriented gastric pouch, based on the lesser curvature of the stomach, is created using linear cutter staplers (endo-GIA).The gastrojejunal anastomosis is reinforced with an omental wrap (omental flap). The jejunojejunostomy is created 100–150 cm from the gastrojejunostomy, depending on the BMI. Results 124 laparoscopic RYGBPs were performed by the same surgeon. The omental wrap was successfully performed in all patients but two. There were no mortalities, leakages, or stenoses noted during follow-up. Conclusion During RYGBP, reinforcement of the gastrojejunostomy with an omental wrap is a simple, feasible, and protective adjunctive maneuver that can minimize the risk of gastrojejunal leak.     

Reduction of Circular Stapler-Related Wound Infection in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass,Cleveland Clinic Technique

Background  

Circular-stapled anastomosis with trans-oral anvil insertion for the creation of the gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is associated with frequent infections at the abdominal wall site where the circular stapler is inserted.     

Initial results with a stapled gastrojejunostomy for the laparoscopic isolated roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: The gastric pouch to jejunum anastomosis is a critical step in the performance of an isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. When performing this procedure laparoscopically, intracorporeal suturing of the gastric pouch to Roux-en-Y jejunum anastomosis is technically demanding, time consuming, and perhaps the most prohibitive part of the operation. We devised a unique, effective, and simple method to perform this anastomosis using an EEA stapler. This report describes this technique and its follow-up in our series of patients undergoing a laparoscopic isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass utilizing this technique. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed identifying the technical success, leak rate, and postoperative incidence of anastomotic stenosis and its management in a consecutive series of patients undergoing a laparoscopic isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a gastrojejunal anastomosis constructed with a 21-mm or 25-mm EEA stapler. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients underwent laparoscopic isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Mean age was 40.9 years (range 22 to 64) and mean body mass index was 52.3 kg/m(2) (range 31 to 76 kg/m(2)). There were no mortalities. Three patients (6.3%) were converted to an open procedure, but only 1 because of an inability to perform the gastrojejunal anastomosis (short jejunal mesentery). There was 1 leak (2.1%) from the gastrojejunal anastomosis. It was successfully managed nonoperatively. Thirteen patients (27.1%) patients developed an anastomotic stenosis requiring endoscopic balloon dilatation. Seven of the 13 patients required only a single dilatation and have had no recurrence of dysphagia. Six of the 13 patients needed 2 to 4 dilatations, and all are swallowing normally. None have required surgical revision. After 12 months of follow-up, the mean weight loss was 115 pounds and mean decrease in body mass index was 18.5 kg/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: The stapled EEA gastrojejunal anastomosis for the laparoscopic isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is safe and effective. Anastomotic stenosis occurs in approximately one quarter of patients, but it can be managed well with endoscopic balloon dilatation.     

A zero leak rate in 251 consecutive laparoscopic gastric bypass operations using a two-layer gastrojejunostomy technique

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is quickly replacing open techniques in the morbidly obese patient who presents for surgical treatment. Safety concerns about the laparoscopic technique have arisen in the literature with gastrojejunostomy leak rates of 5% or greater reported in several series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 251 consecutive gastric bypass operations were performed from August 2001 to January 2004 by a single surgeon with over 6 years' experience. A double layer technique was used for every gastrojejunostomy anastomosis. This consisted of end-to-side stapled anastomosis using only 30 mm of a 45 mm blue (3.5 mm) staple cartridge that was fired inside the gastric pouch and Roux limb. A posterior running suture was then used to reinforce the back wall. An intraluminal 32F bougie was placed before the stapler opening was closed. Finally, 2 running sutures were used to reinforce the anterior and lateral sides of the anastomosis. RESULTS: The average patient age was 43 years (range, 18-67 years), 89% were female, average preoperative weight was 137 kg (range, 89.5-214.5 kg), and average body mass index of 49 kg/m2 (range, 35-75). One hundred forty-two cases were performed with the Ethicon endoscopic linear stapler and 109 with the United States Surgical endoscopic linear stapler. There were no anastomotic leaks, staple line leaks, pulmonary emboli, or in-hospital deaths recorded. Endoscopic dilation successfully treated 10 (4%) cases of stomal stenosis. Eleven (4%) patients developed marginal ulcers that were easily treated with a proton pump inhibitor. Average excess weight loss at 12 months and 18 months was 63% and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic results are as good as or better than open surgery in the morbidly obese patient. The learning curve for this operation is steep and this may be reflected in the higher leak rates reported in earlier series. However, the technique used to create the gastrojejunostomy anastomosis may also account for a lower leak rate. The two-layer gastrojejunostomy anastomotic technique combines an inner stapled layer and outer sutured layer that yields excellent results.     

Early Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage after Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Background: Early gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage after open gastric bypass has been infrequently reported. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of early GI hemorrhage after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP), its presentation, and possible treatment options. Methods: A retrospective review of 5 patients who developed early postoperative GI hemorrhage after LRYGBP was performed.The charts were reviewed for demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment. All patients underwent a transected LRYGBP with creation of the gastrojejunostomy anastomosis with a circular stapler and the jejunojejunostomy anastomosis with a linear stapler. Results: Of the 155 patients in our database who underwent LRYGBP, 5 (3.2%) developed early clinical GI hemorrhage. There were 2 males with an average age of 40 years. Clinical presentations of GI hemorrhage were hematemesis (2 patients), bright red blood per rectum (1 patient), melena (1 patient), and hypotension (1 patient). A diagnostic study (nuclear scintigraphy) was performed in only 1 of 5 patients. 3 of 5 patients were managed nonoperatively; 2 patients required fluid and blood resuscitation, and the other patient was managed without blood transfusion. The onset of hemorrhage in these 3 patients occurred 24 hours postoperatively or later. 2 of 5 patients required operative intervention for control of hemorrhage. The onset of hemorrhage or hypotension in these 2 patients occurred within 12 hours after surgery. The sites of hemorrhage were at the gastric remnant staple-lines in 1 patient and at the gastrojejunostomy and gastric remnant staple-lines in the other patient. Conclusion: Early GI hemorrhage is a potential complication after transected LRYGBP. Early reoperative intervention should be performed for patients with hemodynamic instability and patients with early onset of hemorrhage after surgery.     

Advances in Circular Stapling Techniques for Gastric Bypass: The Circular Stapler Introducer

Background  Modern laparoscopic bariatric surgery relies strongly on stapling devices and the perfection of the anastomotic technique is at the core of the patient’s safety. Methods  Circular stapler anastomosis is a common technique for performing gastro-jejunostomy in gastric bypass surgery. In obese patients, transabdominal circular stapler introduction can be challenging and associated with morbidity. To overcome these technical obstacles, we have developed a new device, circular stapler introducer (CSI) to assist both the abdominal wall passage of the circular staplers and its introduction into the jejunum. Results  The CSI facilitates the insertion of the circular stapler not only into the abdomen but also into the jejunum enhancing safety and swiftness of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Conclusions  Our innovative CSI device facilitates this part of the operation significantly and makes the performance of bariatric surgery more convenient.     

Shorter circular staple is height associated with lower anastomotic stricture rate in laparoscopic gastric bypass

BackgroundAnastomotic stenosis, leak, and hemorrhage are common stapler-related complications of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In May 2007, we transitioned from a 25-mm diameter, 4.8-mm-height circular stapler to a 25-mm, 3.5-mm-height circular stapler. We hypothesized that the staple height would be associated with a decreased incidence of perioperative complications.MethodsThe records of 360 consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from May 1, 2006 to March 31, 2008 were retrospectively abstracted. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project and Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative databases were used to collect the patient demographics and track complications of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Data were collected on the rates of anastomotic stenosis requiring dilation of the gastrojejunostomy, anastomotic leak, hemorrhage requiring transfusion, and wound infection. Patients with a 4.8-mm staple height gastrojejunostomy were compared with those with a 3.5-mm staple height gastrojejunostomy for differences in complications.ResultsThe groups were similar with respect to age, gender, body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, sleep apnea, and surgery duration. In the 4.8- and 3.5-mm staple height groups, 15% and 6.1% required gastrojejunal dilation, respectively (P = .01). A trend was seen toward a decrease in postoperative hemorrhage (5% versus 2.8%) with the shorter staple height. No anastomotic leaks occurred, and the incidence of wound infection (1.7% versus 2.2%) was similar between the 2 groups.ConclusionIn the present study, the use of a 25-mm, 3.5-mm staple height circular stapler was associated with a decreased rate of anastomotic stenosis.     

Experience with the Circular Stapler for the Gastrojejunostomy in Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (350 Cases)

Background: The increased incidence of morbid obesity has resulted in an increase in bariatric surgery. The gastrojejunostomy performed during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) operations has technical variability with different outcomes and complication-rates immediate postoperatively and at long-term follow-up. Methods: Between Jan 2000 and Feb 2005, 350 laparoscopic RYGBP procedures were performed. We present our immediate and follow-up rate of complications with total intraabdominal gastrojejunostomy, performed with the circular stapler. Results: Complications of gastrojejunostomy were detected in 24 patients (6.8%): 3 anastomotic leaks (0.8%); 6 bleeding (1.7%) immediately postoperatively, and 4 stenoses (1.1%), 10 ulcers (2.8%) and 1 stenosis plus ulcer (0.3%) during long-term follow-up. There was no mortality related to the gastrojejunostomy. Conclusions: The gastrojejunostomy with circular stapler is an easily reproducible procedure. The rate of complications has been low. Surgeons who perform laparoscopic RYGBP should have a careful learning curve, and should be aware of the potential complications and their management.     

Complications at gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison between 21- and 25-mm circular staplers.

BACKGROUND: Complications involving the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for morbid obesity frequently result in hospital readmission and additional procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare the complication rate of GJ performed with the 21- and 25-mm circular staplers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the incidence of stricture, bleeding, ulcer, and leak at the GJ in 438 consecutive patients who had undergone LRYGB. RESULTS: The GJ was performed using the 25-mm stapler in 374 patients and the 21-mm stapler in 64 patients. Of the 50 anastomotic complications, 11 (17.2%) occurred with the 21-mm stapler, including 6 strictures (9.4%), 4 ulcers (6.3%), and 1 leak (1.6%), and 39 (10.4%) with the 25-mm stapler, including 11 strictures (2.9%), 6 acute bleeding episodes (1.6%), 19 ulcers (5.4%), and 4 leaks (1.1%). Rehospitalization was required in 9 patients (47%) with a pure stricture and 17 (74%) with ulcers. The incidence of pure stricture was significantly greater in the GJ performed with the 21-mm than with the 25-mm stapler (P = .026, Fisher's exact test). No difference was found in the rate of acute bleeding, leak, or ulcer between the 2 groups. All strictures resolved with balloon dilation. Four patients with stenotic ulcers that failed to respond to dilation and medications required operative revision. No difference was found in postoperative weight loss between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Anastomotic complications were recognized in 50 (11.4%) of 438 patients who had undergone LRYGB in which the GJ was performed using circular staplers, including 11 (17.2%) with the 21-mm and 39 (10.2%) with the 25-mm stapler. The rate of anastomotic stricture was significantly lower using the 25-mm circular stapler.     

Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy: case report

Background  Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy allows effective palliation and rapid recovery for the patient with limited survival due to advanced pancreatic cancer presenting with gastric outlet obstruction. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) offers excellent cosmetic results and may be associated with decreased postoperative pain, reduced need for analgesia, and thus accelerated recovery. The authors report the first transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy. Methods  Preliminary experience with transumbilical single-incision, intracorporeal anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy for a patient with gastric outlet obstruction caused by advanced pancreatic cancer is reported. Results  Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy was performed with a linear endoscopic stapler using an omega loop. The operative time was 117 min. No intra- or postoperative complications were recorded. Conclusion  Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomoses are feasible using the endoscopic linear stapler. Transumbilical single-incision gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction may improve cosmetic results and allow accelerated recovery for patients with limited survival. This anastomosis technique of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for other digestive tract procedures needs further evaluation.     

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass--evaluation of three different techniques

Background:The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is one of the ideal operations for morbid obesity.The minimal invasive laparoscopic technique has been performed to shorten the operative time and to reduce the complications of the open surgery. Methods: From Jan 1999 through Jan 2001, laparoscopic RYGBP (LRYGBP) was attempted in 90 patients. Median age was 30, with median preoperative BMI 47. The preoperative nutritional habits and comorbidities were recorded. LRYGBP was done by three different techniques in three equal groups. In the first group, the gastrojejunostomy was constructed by passing the EEA anvil transorally, using a pull-wire technique. In the second group, the gastrojejunostomy was fashioned with a totally hand-sewn technique. In the third group, the gastrojejunostomy was performed with an endo-cutter cartridge and the anastomotic incision was closed with an endo TA30 stapler. Results: The results were nearly identical in the three groups. Average excess weight loss at 1 year was 70%. The mean operating time was 120 min in the first group, 100 min in the second group and 75 min in the third group. Esophageal injury was the most common problem in the first group. Incidence of gastrojejunostomy stenosis was higher in the second group (36.6%). Incidence of internal herniation was higher in the second (17%) and first (13.6%) groups than in the third group (3.3%). Conclusion: Whichever technique is used to construct the gastrojejunostomy, LRYGBP is a safe, effective and technically feasible operation for morbidly obese patients. We recommend the technique of constructing the gastrojejunostomy with an endocutter cartridge and closing the anastomotic incision with an endo TA stapler, as it saved time and reduced the incidence of the essential complications in gastric bypass surgery.     

Utility of Divided Omentum for Preventing Complications Associated with Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Background Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has emerged as a standard surgical treatment for morbid obesity. However, prevention of postoperative complications associated with bariatric surgery is an important consideration. Methods To reduce postoperative complications and achieve adequate body weight loss, we introduce a simple procedure using a divided omentum during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The actual aim of this procedure is to prevent leakage from the gastric pouch or anastomosis and the gastro-gastric fistula because of reentry of the alimentary tract. Between February 2002 and April 2007, we performed laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity in 94 patients. In the most recent 83 cases, our simple procedure using a divided omentum was employed. Results These patients comprised 20 males and 63 females, with a mean age of 38 years, and a mean body mass index of 44.1 kg/m². At surgery, the omentum is routinely divided using laparoscopic coagulating shears before performing gastrojejunostomy to reduce the tension on the anastomosis caused by the route of reconstruction. After performing hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy, the left side of the divided omentum is moved cranially and interposed between the gastric pouch and the excluded stomach. The omentum is then sutured from the posterior aspect of the gastric pouch to the anterior side of the anastomosis. Conclusion Our procedure using a divided omentum during bariatric surgery is feasible and safe for obtaining better outcomes without artificial materials. Although the long-term outcome of this technique is still unclear, we believe that it will contribute to decreasing the particular complications related to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.     

Complications of the Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: 1,040 Patients - What Have We Learned?

Background:The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is one of the most common operations for morbid obesity. Laparoscopic techniques have been reported, but suffer from small numbers of patients, longer operative times and seemingly higher initial complication rates as compared to the traditional "open" procedure. The minimally invasive approach continues to be a challenge even to the most experienced laparoscopic surgeons.The purpose of this study is to describe our experience and complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a totally hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy. Methods: 1,040 consecutive laparoscopic procedures were evaluated prospectively. Only patients who had a previous open gastric procedure were excluded initially. Eventually, even patients with failed "open" bariatric procedures and other gastric procedures were revised laparoscopically to the RYGBP. All patients met NIH criteria for consideration for weight reductive surgery. Results:There were no anastomotic leaks from the hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy. Early complications and open conversions were related to sub-optimal exposure and bowel fixation techniques. Several staple failures were attributed to a manufacturer redesign of an instrument. Average hospital stay was 1.9 days for all patients and 1.5 days for patients without complications. Operative times consistently approach 60 minutes. Average excess weight loss was 70% at 12 months.There were 5 deaths: perioperative pulmonary embolism (1), late pulmonary embolism (2), asthma (1), and suicide (1). Conclusions: The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity with a totally hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy can be safely performed by the bariatric surgeon with advanced laparoscopic skills in the community setting. Fixation and closure of all potential hernia sites with non-absorbable sutures is essential. Stenosis of the hand-sewn gastrojejunal anastomosis is amenable to endoscopic balloon dilation. Meticulous attention must be paid to the operative and perioperative care of the patient.     

Gastrojejunal Strictures after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass With a 21-MM Circular Stapler

Introduction:

Intraluminal staplers for gastrojejunostomy construction during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) may be associated with postoperative strictures. We analyzed outcomes of a transabdominal circular-stapled RYGBP with evaluation of short- and long-term anastomotic complications.

Methods:

All laparoscopic RYGBPs performed between January 2004 and December 2005 at an academic institution were reviewed. The gastrojejunostomy was created by using the transabdominal passage of a 21-mm intraluminal circular stapler into an antecolic, antegastric Roux limb. This retrospective chart review analyzes patient demographics, anastomotic complications, and weight loss.

Results:

Between January 2004 and December 2005, 159 patients underwent transabdominal circular-stapled RYGBP. Fifteen patients developed a stenosis at the gastrojejunostomy, all requiring endoscopic balloon dilatation. One of these patients required laparoscopic revision of the gastrojejunostomy. Eleven strictures occurred after 30 days, whereas only 4 strictures occurred within 30 days of surgery. Two marginal ulcerations were seen within 1 year of surgery.

Conclusion:

Our 9.4% stricture rate parallels what has been reported in the literature. The majority of strictures were amenable to one endoscopic treatment session. Transabdominal circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy is a reproducible construct for use in bariatric surgery.