Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample

PurposeTo identify racial/ethnic disparities in utilization rates, in-hospital outcomes and health care resource use among Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), African Americans (AA) and Hispanics undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States (US).Methods and resultsThe National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients ≥18 years of age who underwent TAVR from 2012 to 2014. The primary outcome was all-cause in hospital mortality. A total of 36,270 individuals were included in the study. The number of TAVR performed per million population increased in all study groups over the three years [38.8 to 103.8 (NHW); 9.1 to 26.4 (AA) and 9.4 to 18.2 (Hispanics)]. The overall in-hospital mortality was 4.2% for the entire cohort. Race/ethnicity showed no association with in-hospital mortality (P > .05). Though no significant difference were found between AA and NHW in any secondary outcome, being Hispanic was associated with higher incidence of acute myocardial infarction (aOR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.06–3.85; P = .03), stroke/transient ischemic attack (aOR = 1.81; 95% CI, 1.04–3.14; P = .04), acute kidney injury (aOR = 1.65; 95% CI, 1.23–2.21; P < .01), prolonged length of stay (aOR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08–1.29; P < .01) and higher hospital costs (aOR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.18–1.36; P < .01).ConclusionThere are significant racial disparities in patients undergoing TAVR in the US. Though in-hospital mortality was not associated with race/ethnicity, Hispanic patients had less TAVR utilization, higher in-hospital complications, prolonged length of stay and increased hospital costs.     

Frailty Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Older Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): From the National Inpatient Sample

ObjectiveWe aimed to study the impact of frailty on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures.MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for all patients aged ≥65 years who underwent a TAVR procedure during the years 2016–2017. Frailty was measured using a previously validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) scoring system. The score is ICD-10 code based; thus, it can be calculated from an administrative database. Study outcomes were in-hospital all-cause mortality, peri-procedural complications, length of stay, and total cost. Outcomes were modeled using logistic regression for binary outcomes and generalized linear regression for continuous outcomes.ResultsThere were 84,750 patients included in the study. These patients were divided into low-risk (61,050), intermediate-risk (22,955), and high-risk (744), based on average frailty index scores of 2, 7, and 16.8, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the HFRS correlated with increased odds for mortality with an adjusted odd ratio (a-OR) of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.22–1.29, p < 0.001), myocardial infarction [a-OR 1.10 (95% CI: 1.07–1.13, p < 0.001)], pericardiocentesis [a-OR 1.16 (95% CI: 1.12–1.20, p < 0.001)], pacemaker insertion [a-OR 1.06 (95% CI: 1.04–1.08, p < 0.001)], blood transfusion [a-OR 1.14 (95% CI: 1.11–1.16, p < 0.001)], vascular complications [a-OR 1.05 (95% CI: 1.00–1.09, p = 0.03)], longer length of stay [a-MR 1.10 (95% CI: 1.10–1.11, p < 0.001)] and higher cost [a-MR: 1.04 (95% CI: 1.03–1.04, p < 0.001)].ConclusionThe HFRS can be utilized in the risk stratification of older patients undergoing TAVR.     

Artificial Intelligence Trumps TAVI2-SCORE and CoreValve Score in Predicting 1-Year Mortality Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background/purposeMachine learning has been used to predict procedural risk in patients undergoing various medical interventions and procedures. One-year mortality in patients after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has a wide range (from 8.5 to 24% in various studies). We sought to apply machine learning to determine predictors of one year mortality in patients undergoing TAVR.Methods/materialsA retrospective study of 1055 patients who underwent TAVR (Jan 2014–June 2017) with one-year follow up was completed. Baseline demographics, clinical, electrocardiography (ECG), Computed Tomography (CT) and echocardiography data were abstracted. Variables with near zero variance or ≥50% missing data were excluded. The Gradient Boosting Machine learning (GBM) prediction model included 163 variables and was optimized using 5-fold cross-validation repeated 10-times. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) for the GBM model was calculated to predict one-year mortality post TAVR, and then compared to the TAVI₂-SCORE and CoreValve score.ResultsAmong 1055 TAVR patients (mean age 80.9 ± 7.9 years, 42% female), 14.02% died at one year. 78% had balloon expandable valves placed. Based on GBM, the ten most predictive variables for one-year survival were cardiac power index, hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, INR, diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, valve calcium score, serum creatinine, aortic annulus area, and albumin. The area under ROC to predict survival for the GBM model vs TAVI₂-SCORE and CoreValve Score was 0.72 (95% CI 0.68–0.78) vs 0.56 (95%CI 0.51–0.62) and 0.53 (95% CI 0.47–0.59) respectively with p < 0.0001.ConclusionThe GBM model outperforms TAVI₂-SCORE and CoreValve Score in predicting mortality one-year post TAVR.     

Incidence,Predictors, and Outcomes of Endocarditis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States

ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate the incidence and outcomes of endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).BackgroundData about endocarditis after TAVR are limited.MethodsThe study investigated Medicare patients who underwent TAVR from 2012 to 2017 and identified patients admitted with endocarditis during follow-up using a validated algorithm. The main study outcome was all-cause mortality.ResultsOf 134,717 patients who underwent TAVR, 1868 patients developed endocarditis during follow-up (incidence 0.87%/year), with majority of infections (65.0%) occurring within 1 year. Incidence of endocarditis declined in recent years. The most common organisms were Staphylococcus (22.0%), Streptococcus (20.0%), and Enterococcus (15.5%). Important predictors for endocarditis were younger age at TAVR, male sex, prior endocarditis, end-stage renal disease, repeat TAVR procedures, liver and lung disease, and post-TAVR acute kidney injury. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality were 18.5% and 45.6%, respectively. After adjusting for comorbidities and procedural complications, endocarditis after TAVR was associated with 3-fold higher risk of mortality (44.9 vs. 16.2 deaths per 100 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.77 to 3.12; p < 0.0001). End-stage renal disease (aHR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.72 to 2.60), endocarditis complicated by cardiogenic shock (aHR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.56 to 4.02), ischemic stroke (aHR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.28), intracerebral hemorrhage (aHR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.76), acute kidney injury (aHR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.63), blood transfusion (aHR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.50), staphylococcal (aHR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.49 to 1.97), and fungal endocarditis (aHR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.39) (p < 0.05 for all) portended higher mortality following endocarditis.ConclusionsThe incidence of endocarditis after TAVR is low and declining. However, it is associated with poor prognosis with one-half the patients dying within 1 year.     

Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis in Patients Undergoing TAVR Compared to SAVR: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundThe risk of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is presumed to be high.MethodsElectronic databases were searched to identify articles comparing the rate of PVE in post-TAVR and post-surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) patients. Pooled adjusted odds ratio (OR) was computed using a random-effects model.ResultsA total of 19 studies consisting of 84,288 patients, were identified. There was no significant difference in the odds of PVE between patients undergoing TAVR and SAVR, at 30-day (OR 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20–1.92, p = 0.41), 1-year (OR 0.99 95% CI 0.89–1.11, p = 0.84), 2-year (OR 1.02 95% CI 0.68–1.54, p = 0.92) and 5-year (OR 1.03 95% CI 0.80–1.33, p = 0.81). A subgroup sensitivity analysis also showed no significant inter-group differences in the rate of PVE at all time points, when stratified by the study design (clinical trial vs. observational), type of TAVR valves used (self-expanding bioprosthetic valves vs. balloon expanded bioprosthetic valves) and surgical risk of patients (high vs. intermediate vs. low). There was no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) in the outcomes of the included studies at 30-day, 1-year and 2-year, while the heterogeneity in studies at 5-year was minimal (I2 = 22%).ConclusionsIn comparison to SAVR, both short and long-term risk of prosthetic valve endocarditis appears to be identical in patients undergoing TAVR. This risk is unaffected by the type of valve, duration of follow-up, study design and surgical risk of the patients.     

Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundTAVR is an established treatment option in high and intermediate-risk patients with severe AS. There is less data regarding the efficacy of TAVR in low-risk patients. This meta-analysis evaluated efficacy and safety outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).MethodsDatabases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared TAVR with SAVR for the treatment of low-risk patients with severe AS. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the random-effects model.ResultsThe final analysis included 2953 patients from 5 studies. Compared to SAVR, TAVR was associated with similar mid-term mortality [OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.37–1.21; p = 0.18], as well as similar short-term mortality [OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.24–1.11; p = 0.09]. Randomization to TAVR was associated with a reduced risk of developing acute kidney injury [OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.13–0.52; p < 0.001], short-term major bleeding [OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.12–0.60; p < 0.001] and new-onset atrial fibrillation [OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.14–0.21; p < 0.001]. However, TAVR was associated with a higher risk of requiring permanent pacemaker implantation [OR 4.25; 95% CI 1.86–9.73; p < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, endocarditis or aortic valve re-intervention between the two groups.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis showed that TAVR has similar clinical efficacy to SAVR, with a more favorable safety profile, in patients with severe AS who are at low-surgical risk.     

Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Anatomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) versus tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) stenosis.BackgroundAt present, limited observational data exist supporting TAVR in the context of bicuspid anatomy.MethodsPrimary endpoints were 1-year survival and device success. Secondary endpoints included moderate to severe paravalvular leak (PVL) and a composite endpoint of periprocedural complications; incidence rates of individual procedural endpoints were also explored individually.ResultsIn the main analysis, 17 studies and 181,433 patients undergoing TAVR were included, of whom 6,669 (0.27%) had BAV. A secondary analysis of 7,071 matched subjects with similar baseline characteristics was also performed. Device success and 1-year survival rates were similar between subjects with BAV and those with TAV (97% vs 94% [P = 0.55] and 91.3% vs 90.8% [P = 0.22], respectively). In patients with BAV, a trend toward a higher risk for periprocedural complications was observed in our main analysis (risk ratio [RR]: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.99-1.27; P = 0.07) but not in the matched population secondary analysis (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.81-1.24; P = 0.99). The risk for moderate to severe PVL was higher in subjects with BAV (RR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.29-1.58; P < 0.0001) as well as the incidence of cerebral ischemic events (2.4% vs 1.6%; P = 0.015) and of annular rupture (0.3% vs 0.02%; P = 0.014) in matched subjects.ConclusionsTAVR is a feasible option among selected patients with BAV anatomy, but the higher rates of moderate to severe PVL, annular rupture, and cerebral ischemic events observed in the BAV group warrant caution and further evidence.     

Clinical Outcomes of the Self-Expandable Evolut R Valve Versus the Balloon-Expandable SAPIEN 3 Valve in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now indicated in patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and low, moderate, and high surgical risk. There are multiple types of valves available in TAVR. SAPIEN 3, and Evolut R are two of the most commonly used valves.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies that compared SAPIEN 3 vs Evolut R in patients undergoing TAVR. The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included major of life-threatening bleeding, risk of stroke, need of permanent pacemaker implantation, and risk of moderate to severe paravalvular regurgitation (PVR).ResultsWe included a total of 9 studies. One study was a randomized clinical trial, five were prospective observational studies and three were retrospective. 30-day mortality rate was similar between SAPIEN 3 and Evolut R (odds ratio (OR) 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 1.93; p = 0.47). The risk of major or life-threatening bleeding (OR of 0.83, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.39; p = 0.48), and the risk of stroke (OR of 0.82, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.78; p = 0.62) were also similar between the two types of valves. Compared to SAPIEN 3, Evolut R was associated with statistically significant risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (OR of 1.40, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.70; p = 0.0007), and moderate to severe PVR (OR of 2.56, 95% CI 1.14 to 5.74; p = 0.02).ConclusionsAt 30 day follow up, both Evolut R and SAPIEN 3 shared similar risks of 30-day mortality, major or life-threatening bleeding, and stroke; however greater odds of pacemaker placement implantation and moderate to severe PVR were associated with Evolut R.     

Sex-specific outcomes and management in critically ill septic patients

Background: Female and male critically ill septic patients might differ with regards to risk distribution, management, and outcomes. We aimed to compare male versus female septic patients in a large collective with regards to baseline risk distribution and outcomes.Methods: In total, 17,146 patients were included in this analysis, 8781 (51%) male and 8365 (49%) female patients. The primary endpoint was ICU-mortality. Baseline characteristics and data on organ support were documented. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to assess sex-specific differences.Results: Female patients had lower SOFA scores (5 ± 5 vs. 6 ± 6; p<0.001) and creatinine (1.20±1.35 vs. 1.40±1.54; p<0.001). In the total cohort, the ICU mortality was 10% and similar between female and male (10% vs. 10%; p = 0.34) patients. The ICU remained similar between sexes after adjustment in model-1 (aOR 1.05 95% CI 0.95–1.16; p = 0.34); model-2 (aOR 0.91 95% CI 0.79–1.05; p = 0.18) and model-3 (aOR 0.93 95% CI 0.80–1.07; p = 0.29). In sensitivity analyses, no major sex-specific differences in mortality could be detected.Conclusion: In this study no clinically relevant sex-specific mortality differences could be detected in critically ill septic patients. Possible subtle gender differences could play a minor role in the acute situation due to the severity of the disease in septic patients.     

Validation of the VARC-3 Technical Success Definition in Patients Undergoing TAVR

ObjectivesThe authors aimed to investigate the rates, predictors, and prognostic impact of technical success in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).BackgroundThe Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) has introduced a composite endpoint to assess the immediate technical success of TAVR.MethodsIn the prospective Bern TAVR registry, patients were stratified according to VARC-3 technical success. Technical failure differentiated between vascular and cardiac complications.ResultsIn a total of 1,624 patients undergoing TAVR between March 2012 and December 2019, 1,435 (88.4%) patients had technical success. Among 189 patients with technical failure, 140 (8.6%) had vascular and 49 (3.0%) had cardiac technical failure. Female, larger device landing zone calcium volume, and the early term of the study period were associated with an increased risk for cardiac technical failure, whereas higher body mass index and the use of the Prostar (Abbott Vascular Inc) MANTA (Teleflex) (compared with the ProGlide [Abbott Vascular Inc]) were predictors of vascular technical failure. In multivariable analysis, technical failure conferred an increased risk for cardiovascular death or stroke (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.37-2.95). The adverse effect remained when stratified to cardiac (HR: 2.62; 95% CI: 1.38-4.97) or vascular technical failure (HR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.28-2.95) and limited to the periprocedural period (0-30 days: HR: 3.42 [95% CI: 2.05-5.69]; 30-360 days: HR: 1.36 [95% CI: 0.79-2.35]; P for interaction = 0.002).ConclusionsTechnical failure according to VARC-3 was observed in 1 of 10 patients undergoing TAVR and was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of the composite outcome at 1 year after TAVR. (Swiss TAVI Registry; NCT01368250)     

Prognostic impact of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BackgroundLeft ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) develops with both structural and electrical remodeling in response to elevated afterload due to aortic stenosis (AS). This study evaluated the prognostic value of electrocardiographic LVH (ECG LVH) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).MethodsA retrospective study including 157 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR was conducted. ECG LVH was defined as Sokolow–Lyon voltage (S in V₁ + R in V_5/6) before TAVR was ≥3.5mV. We investigated the association between ECG LVH and the 1-year composite outcome comprising all-cause death and rehospitalization related to heart failure. ECG and echocardiographic measurements at 1, 6, and 12 months after TAVR were assessed.ResultsThe baseline characteristics were comparable between the ECG LVH (n = 74) and non-ECG LVH groups (n = 83). The ECG LVH was associated with a significantly greater reduction of Sokolow–Lyon voltage and LV mass index than the non-ECG LVH after TAVR. The absence of ECG LVH was an independent predictor of the 1-year composite outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 2.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01 – 5.60; p = 0.04]. Furthermore, a reduction of Sokolow–Lyon voltage from baseline to 1-month follow-up, but not a reduction of LV mass index, was associated with a lower cumulative composite outcome from 1 month to 1 year (adjusted HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15 – 0.86; p = 0.02).ConclusionsECG LVH was associated with a low incidence of adverse clinical outcomes and greater reverse LV remodeling after TAVR. Preprocedural and serial LVH assessment by ECG might be useful in AS patients undergoing TAVR.     

Factors affecting prognosis of the patients with severe hyponatremia

IntroductionHyponatremia is one of the most common electrolyte abnormalities in clinical practice. Data regarding factors that have impact on mortality of severe hyponatremia and outcomes of its therapeutic management is insufficient. The present study aimed to examine the factors associated with mortality and the outcomes of treatment in patients with severe hyponatremia.Materials and methodsPatients with serum Na ≤ 115 mequiv./L who were admitted to Ordu State Hospital and Ordu University Training and Research Hospital between 2014 and 2018 were included in the study. Demographic and laboratory features, severity of the symptoms, comorbid diseases, medications, and clinical outcome measures of the patients were obtained retrospectively from their medical records. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality, overcorrection and undercorrection were assessed.ResultsA total of 145 patients (median age 69 years and 58.6% female) met inclusion criteria. Diuretic use was the most common etiologic factor for severe hyponatremia that present in 50 (34.5%) patients. Sixty-seven (46.2%) patients had moderately severe while 8 patients (5.5%) had severe symptoms. The median increase in serum Na 24 h after admission in the study population was 8.9 mequiv./L (?6 to 19). Nonoptimal correction was seen in 92 (63.4%) patients. Hypertonic saline use was associated with overcorrection (OR, 3.07; 95% CI: 1.47–6.39; p = 0.002). Avoidance of hypertonic saline (aOR, 2.52; 95% CI: 1.12–5.66; p = 0.029) and having neuropsychiatric disorder (aOR, 2.60; 95% CI: 1.10–6.11; p = 0.025) were associated with undercorrection. In-hospital mortality rate was 12.4% and having CKD and cancer, undercorrection of sodium and presence of severe symptoms were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality.ConclusionSevere hyponatremia in hospitalized patients is associated with substantial mortality. The incidence of non-optimal correction of serum Na is high; under-correction, presence of severe symptoms, chronic kidney disease and cancer were the factors that increase mortality rate.     

Outcomes Following Shock Aortic Valve Replacement: Transcatheter Versus Surgical Approaches

ObjectivesTo compare transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients in shock.BackgroundThere are minimal data on the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes for patients in shock that undergo TAVR and no data comparing these outcomes to similar patients undergoing SAVR.MethodsThis is a single center, retrospective cohort study of patients having Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)-defined urgent or emergent AVR for aortic stenosis with clinical signs and symptoms of shock. Inclusion criteria were based on the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) shock consensus statement and included: the need for inotropic or vasopressor agents, mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy or newly initiated hemodialysis, and/or utilization of mechanical hemodynamic support. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes for TAVR and SAVR were compared.ResultsThirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria for this study (17 TAVR, 20 SAVR). TAVR patients had a higher STS Predicted Risk of Mortality (PROM) score of 22.3% compared to 11.8% for SAVR patients (p = 0.001). No significant differences were found in baseline echocardiographic results. TAVR procedures required less procedure room time (185.9 min TAVR, 348.5 min SAVR, p < 0.001) and fewer intraoperative packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions (0.2 units TAVR, 3.4 units SAVR, p < 0.001). TAVR patients also had lower rates of prolonged postoperative ventilation compared to SAVR patients (38.5% TAVR, 75.0% SAVR, p = 0.047). TAVR and SAVR had similar rates of mortality at discharge (2 TAVR, 1 SAVR, p = 0.584), 30-days (2 TAVR, 1 SAVR, p = 0.584), and 1-year (8 TAVR, 5 SAVR, p = 0.149).ConclusionsDespite a higher risk TAVR group, patients in shock undergoing either TAVR or SAVR have similar 30-day mortality. At one year, SAVR patients have a numerically better, though not statistically significant, survival. These findings support the use of TAVR for patients in shock with aortic stenosis.     

Incidence, 30-day readmission rates and predictors of readmission after new onset atrial fibrillation who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement

IntroductionNew onset Atrial Fibrillation (NOAF) is frequently seen post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). NOAF in the setting of TAVR has also been recognized as predictor of worse outcomes, including higher readmission rates. Data assessing the effect and predictors of NOAF on 30-day readmission rates post TAVR is limited.ObjectiveTo assess the incidence, 30-day readmission rate and predictors of NOAF in patients who underwent TAVR.MethodsNationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify patients who developed NOAF post-TAVR between 2012 and 2015.ResultsA total of 24,076 patients were included in this study, of which 54% were males, and the mean age was 82.4 ± 7.2. NOAF was developed in 10,847 (45%) patients. Overall readmission rates with NOAF was 19.7% and trend in the readmissions reduced during the course of the study (21.9% to 18.7%, P_trend < 0.001). Thirty-day readmission rate in patients who developed NOAF post-TAVR was significantly higher compared to TAVR patients without NOAF (OR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.28–1.51; p < 0.001). Similarly, rate of ischemic stroke was significantly higher among patients who developed NOAF (OR 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07–1.4; p = 0.004). Predictors of readmissions in NOAF group were mostly non-cardiac, and included age, and comorbidities with chronic liver disease, renal failure and chronic lung disease been the most common comorbidities, in that order.ConclusionsIncidence of NOAF is associated with increased risk of readmissions and ischemic stroke. Future research should focus on interventions to prevent avoidable readmissions and associated morbidity and mortality.     

Routine Ultrasound or Fluoroscopy Use and Risk of Vascular/Bleeding Complications After Transfemoral TAVR

ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine the benefits of routine use of 2D-US in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).BackgroundTwo-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) reduces access-related vascular complications (VCs) and bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention via transfemoral approach. Potential similar benefits in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR have not been systemically investigated.MethodsRates of access-related VCs or bleeding were compared using 5-year retrospective observational data from 2 neighboring high-volume UK TAVR centers systemically using 2 different techniques (center 1: fluoroscopy and contralateral angiography [FCA], center 2: 2D-US) for femoral puncture at the time of transfemoral TAVR.ResultsOverall, 1,171 patients were included in the study (FCA, n = 624; 2D-US, n = 529). Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the risk of VCs, bleeding, or their composite according to femoral puncture technique (FCA vs. 2D-US: 6.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.9% to 8.9%] vs. 6.8% [95% CI: 4.8% to 9.3%]; p = 0.63; 6.1% [95% CI: 4.4% to 8.2%] vs. 6.4% [95% CI: 4.8% to 9.3%]; p = 0.70; and 9.8% [95% CI: 7.6% to 12.4%] vs. 9.8% [95% CI: 7.4% to 12.7%]; p = 0.76, respectively) and no difference when analysis was restricted to a composite of major VCs or major and life-threatening bleeding.ConclusionsVascular and bleeding complications can be achieved using either FCA or 2D-US guidance. Further studies are required to identify and assess alternative strategies to reduce periprocedural VCs and bleeding in this patient population.     

Outcomes after curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis and review of current literature

BackgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of curative therapy (resection, transplantation, ablation) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arising from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-NAFLD etiologies.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was conducted for studies comparing survival, peri- and post-operative outcomes. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.ResultsFindings for 5579 patients were pooled across 9 studies and examined. Analysis demonstrated improved disease-free survival (DFS; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.98, p = 0.03) and overall survival (OS; HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.81–0.93; p < 0.0001) in NAFLD-HCC patients undergoing liver resection as compared to non-NAFLD HCC patients. NAFLD-HCC patients undergoing all forms of curative therapy were similarly associated with improved OS (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.86–1.06; p = 0.40) and DFS (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74–0.98; p = 0.03), albeit results being significant only for DFS. Only 2 studies reported higher rates of peri- and post-operative complications in patients with NAFLD-HCC. Significant inter-study heterogeneity precluded further analysis.ConclusionNAFLD-HCC patients can enjoy long-term survival benefit with aggressive curative therapy. Peri- and post-operative morbidity should be mitigated with pre-operative optimization of comorbidities, and deliberately close post-operative monitoring.     

One-Year Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The Gulf TAVR Registry

BackgroundThe use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is steadily increasing with TAVR procedures offered to patients across the entire spectrum of surgical risks. The Gulf TAVR registry captures the demographics of patients undergoing TAVR in the Gulf region, comorbidities that drive outcomes, procedural success, complications, and one-year outcomes of death or rehospitalization.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study for adult patients aged at least 18 years undergoing TAVR at eight centers in the Gulf region. The primary outcome was a composite of death or re-hospitalization at one-year. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the composite, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI). We used multivariable Cox regression to determine factors associated with the composite endpoint.ResultsA total of 795 patients (56% male) were included in the final analysis with a mean age of 74.6 (standard deviation (SD) 8.9) years, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score (STS) Score 4.9 (4.2), ejection fraction of 53% (12.7%). Transfemoral approach was employed in over 95% (762/795). The primary outcomes rate was 12.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.6–15.4); secondary endpoints were death 5.4% (95% CI 4.0–7.2); stroke 0.8% (95% CI 0.3, 1.7), MI 0.8% (95% CI 0.4–1.9), rehospitalization: 9.3% (95% CI 7.5–11.5) of whom 71.6% were related to cardiovascular causes. 77% of the cardiovascular admissions were attributable to heart failure or the need for pacemaker implantation. Stage IV or V chronic kidney disease was significantly associated with the primary composite endpoint (Hazard Ratio: 2.49, [95% CI: 1.31, 4.73], p = 0.005). Although not significant, paravalvular leak and severe left ventricular dysfunction showed a 2-fold and 3-fold increased risk for the composite endpoint, respectively.ConclusionsThe Gulf TAVR registry is the first of its kind in the region. It profiles an elderly population with a high procedural success rate and a low rate of complications. One-year outcomes were primarily driven by repeat hospitalization for heart failure and pacemaker implantation indicating a need to optimize heart failure management and improve algorithms for the detection of conduction abnormalities.     

Contemporary Trends and Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis: Insight from the National Inpatient Sample

BackgroundCardiovascular disease is the major cause of mortality in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on dialysis and myocardial infarction constitutes almost 20% of such deaths. We assessed the trends, characteristics and in-hospital outcomes in patients with ESRD.MethodsWe used national inpatient sample (NIS) to identify patients with ESRD presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for calendar years 2012–2016. Multiple logistic regression analysis and propensity matched data was used to compare outcomes for the purpose of our study.ResultsPatients on dialysis who presented with STEMI were less likely to be treated with emergent reperfusion therapies including percutaneous coronary intervention, bypass graft surgery and thrombolytics with in first 24 h. In propensity-matched cohort, the mortality was nearly double in patients who have ESRD compared to patients without ESRD (29.7% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.01). In-patient morbidity such as utilization of tracheostomy, mechanical ventilation and feeding tubes was also more prevalent in propensity matched ESRD cohort. In multivariate regression analysis, ESRD remains a strong predictor of increased mortality in STEMI patients (OR 2.65, 95% CI, 2.57–2.75, p < 0.01).ConclusionOur study showed low utilization of evidence-based prompt reperfusion therapies in ESRD patients with STEMI along with concomitant increased poor outcomes and resource utilization. Future research specifically targeting this extremely high-risk patient population is needed to identify the role of prompt reperfusion therapies in improving outcomes in these patients.     

Home Health Care Utilization Trend,Predictors, and Association With Early Rehospitalization Following Endovascular Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background/purposeHome healthcare (HHC) utilization is associated with higher rates of rehospitalization in patients with heart failure and transcatheter mitral valve repair. This study sought to assess the utilization, predictors, and the association of HHC with 30-day readmission in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).Methods/materialsWe queried the Nationwide Readmission Database from January 2012 to December 2017 for TAVR discharges with and without HHC referral. Using multivariate analysis, we identified predictors of HHC utilization, and its association with outcomes.ResultsOf 60,950 TAVR discharges, 21,724 (35.7%) had HHC referral. On multivariable analysis, female sex (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.29–1.40), non-elective admission (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.42–1.56), diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05–1.13), prior stroke (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01–1.12), anemia (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11–1.21), and in-hospital complications including cardiogenic shock (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.16–1.50), cardiac arrest (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.00–1.50), stroke (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 2.20–3.18), and new Permanent pacemaker (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.41–1.58) were identified as independent predictors of HHC referral. HHC utilization was associated with longer median length of stay (4 days vs. 2 days, P < 0.001), higher rate of 30-day all-cause (15.5% vs. 10.6%, P < 0.001) and heart failure (2.1%vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001) readmission rates compared to those without HHC.ConclusionsOur study identified a vulnerable group of TAVR patients that are at higher risk of 30-day readmission. Evidence-based interventions proven effective in reducing the burden of readmissions should be pursed in these patients to improve outcomes and quality of life.