Flare and itch induced by substance P in human skin.

Intradermal injection of synthetic substance P (10(-7)--10(-5) M in humans produced flare, wheal and itching. These responses were inhibited by oral pretreatment of the subjects with an antihistaminic drug (chlorcyclizine) or by local pretreatment with Compound 48/80 administered to deplete the local stores of mast-cell bound histamine. The findings indicate that the responses induced by substance P were mainly mediated by histamine released from the dermal mast cells. In contrast to previously studied histamine liberators, substance P was less potent when acting on rat mast cells in vitro than on human skin mast cells in vivo. When incubated with rat peritoneal mast cells, about 100 times higher concentrations (10(-5) M) were required to induce histamine release than in the in vivo studies on humans. It was concluded that substance P is a potent histamine liberator in human skin.     

Some effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide in human skin and on histamine release

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) produced a dose-related wheal and flare reaction in human skin at doses of 12.5 to 50 pmol. The flare response but not the wheal response to CGRP and substance P were inhibited by prior treatment of the subject with oral chlorpheniramine, 16 mg. CGRP, but not substance P, was potent in producing a delayed erythema and surrounding pallor in human skin, which peaked at 1 h and persisted for more than 3 h after injection, when wheal and flare responses had subsided. The delayed response was accompanied by infiltration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes. The delayed erythema and pallor produced in response to CGRP were not inhibited by oral chlorpheniramine, or by 4% prilocaine injected locally. CGRP released histamine from rat peritoneal mast cells over the concentration range 2.5-10 microM. CGRP was about fourfold less potent than substance P in releasing histamine. The substance P analogue, [D-Pro4, D-Trp7,9,10]SP4-11 10 microM, and benzalkonium chloride 10 microM inhibited histamine release from rat mast cells stimulated by either CGRP or substance P.     

Histamine is released following aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy of human skin and mediates an aminolevulinic acid dose-related immediate inflammatory response

Acute skin inflammation occurs following topical aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT), but its nature and mediation are ill defined. As we observed an urticarial response, a potential role for histamine was explored. In 13 healthy volunteers, we assessed the time course and dose-response of the acute cutaneous response(s) to ALA-PDT, the impact of H(1) antihistamine blockade, and measured dermal histamine release. An ALA dose series was iontophoresed into ventral forearm skin and exposed to red light. All participants exhibited an immediate urticarial response, both wheal and flare correlating with log ALA dose. Subsequently, a dose-related erythema developed at treatment sites by 3 hours and persisted at 24 hours. H(1) blockade with oral cetirizine doubled the median minimal urticating dose of ALA and reduced the slope of dose-response for wheal and flare, whereas at the highest ALA dose, mean wheal and flare areas reduced by 68 and 60%, respectively. In contrast, cetirizine did not influence the 24 hour minimal phototoxic dose or erythema dose-response. Histamine release after ALA-PDT mirrored the urticarial response, levels peaking within 30 minutes and returning to baseline by 24 hours. Thus, two discrete acute inflammatory responses to topical ALA-PDT occur in human skin; histamine mediates the immediate response, but does not appear involved in the delayed phototoxicity.     

Suppression of immediate-type hypersensitivity elicitation in the skin prick test by ultraviolet B irradiation

Reproducibility of skin prick testing (SPT) and its modulation by ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation is of clinical interest. Sensitized atopic volunteers (groups A and B, n=21) were prick tested with common commercial allergen solutions (undiluted, diluted 1:10 and diluted 1:100) before, 24 h after one and 24 h after three suberythematous UVB irradiations. Volunteers in group A (n=8) received local UVB irradiation of prick test areas, whereas volunteers in group B (n=13) received whole body UVB irradiation, with prick test areas covered. In group A, the wheal intensities, expressed as the ratio allergen wheal size to histamine wheal size, were decreased by 28% (1:10 dilution) (P=0.01) and 45% (1:100 dilution) (P=0.02) after one UVB irradiation. Flare intensities were decreased by 48% (1:10 dilution) (P=0.03) after three UVB irradiations. In group B, the wheal and flare responses tended to decrease. Possible mechanisms of this short-term suppressive effect of UVB irradiation on SPT reactions include a direct effect on mast cells. It is concluded that UV irradiation, even a single exposure, prior to skin testing may compromise the validity of SPT testing.     

Effects of acrivastine, loratadine and cetirizine on histamine-induced wheal and flare responses

It is accepted that studies evaluating histamine-induced wheal and flare reactions in the skin represent a simple and reliable method for demonstrating pharmacodynamic activity and pharmacokinetics of the H1-receptor antagonists. In this study, the effects of single oral doses of acrivastine (8 mg), loratadine (10 mg) and cetirizine (10 mg) on the histamine-induced wheal and flare reactions were compared in 60 healthy volunteers. The wheal and flare responses were produced by prick test using 1% histamine solution. Measurements were performed before the ingestion of antihistamines (baseline values) and afterwards at 15, 30, 90, 240, 360 min and 24 h. The values obtained for each antihistamine were compared with each other and with baseline values. Cetirizine was found to be superior to acrivastine and loratadine for the suppression of wheal and flare responses at 240, 360 min and 24 h (P < 0.05) and acrivastine was superior to the other two antihistamines for the suppression of flare response at 30 min (P < 0.05). Our results indicate that a single dose of cetirizine provides a more effective and long acting suppression on wheal and flare reactions in urticaria when compared to acrivastine and loratadine.     

Effects of H1 antagonists on the cutaneous vascular response to histamine and bradykinin: a study using scanning laser Doppler imaging

Histamine plays an important part in the cutaneous weal and flare response which underlies many allergic skin conditions. It has a direct effect on the local vasculature to promote vasodilatation and increase microvascular permeability and may also initiate the more widely spread neurogenic flare. Quantification of these responses and studies of the mediator mechanisms underlying them have been limited by the lack of appropriate techniques to investigate them. To address this we have used two relatively new techniques, scanning laser Doppler imaging (LDI) and dermal microdialysis to measure changes in skin blood flow and the release of histamine within the weal and flare, following intradermal injection of histamine or bradykinin. These measurements have been made both in the absence and presence of the H₁ receptor blockers cetirizine and loratadine. Scanning LDI of the inflammatory response revealed marked differences in both the development and steady state responses to the intradermal injection of histamine (1–3 μmol/L) and bradykinin (1 μmol/L). The development of the flare and the weal response to both histamine and bradykinin was significantly reduced by cetirizine but not by loratadine. The histamine-induced flare area fell by 57 ± 4% (mean ± SEM, n = 10, P < 0.001) after cetirizine and the area of the weal fell by 73 ± 11% (P < 0.009). Bradykinin-induced inflammatory responses were similarly reduced by cetirizine, the weal by 60 ± 16% (P < 0.02) and the flare by 61 ± 4% (P < 0.005). Measurement of histamine concentration in skin using microdialysis, in six subjects, confirmed that histamine levels rose in the dialysate collected from the weal to 310 ± 16 nmol/L following injection of histamine. Histamine levels also rose following bradykinin injection in some subjects (mean 147 ± 46 nmol/L, range 18–336). Little increase in histamine concentration was seen in the dialysate from the flare following injection of either histamine or bradykinin. The histamine concentration in dialysate from unprovoked skin was 4.19 ± 0.75 nmol/L. These data reveal differences in the dermal responses to different mediators when assessed using scanning LDI. They confirm that histamine is released within the weal but not the flare response to the intradermal injection of both histamine and bradykinin and that its effects on the local vasculature to cause the oedematous weal and the axon reflex-mediated flare are significantly attenuated by the H₁ antagonist cetirizine and to a lesser extent by the H₁ antagonist loratadine.     

Further studies on the actions of endothelin-1 on blood flow in human skin

When injected into human skin, endothelin-1 produces intense vasoconstriction localized to the site of the injection, but this area of vasoconstriction is surrounded by vasodilatation which spreads several centimetres from the injection site. The vasodilatation induced by intradermal injection of endothelin-1 (63 pmol) into human skin is prevented by local anaesthetic. Pretreatment of human skin with capsaicin also inhibits this response. Pretreatment of subjects with the selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist cetirizine, 10 mg orally 4 h before intradermal injections, inhibited vasodilatation caused by the intradermal injection of histamine (750 pmol), endothelin-1 (63 pmol), and carbachol (750 pmol). Endothelin-1 (0.3-10 microM) and carbachol (1-30 microM) failed to induce histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells. We conclude that the vasodilatation caused by intradermal injection of endothelin-1 into human skin is neurogenic and is probably mediated by neuropeptide-containing primary afferent neurones. Because neither carbachol nor endothelin-1 cause histamine release from mast cells, our data suggest that histamine release from mast cells at the effector end of the axon reflex is responsible for the carbachol- and endothelin-induced vasodilatation in human skin.     

比拉斯汀在荨麻疹治疗中的应用

比拉斯汀是一种新型的H1受体拮抗剂,口服可治疗过敏性鼻炎和荨麻疹,其吸收较快,但食用食物和果汁后吸收减慢.已有数据证实,相比其他受体,比拉斯汀对H1的亲和力更高,并能降低组胺和细胞因子水平.在由组胺引起的皮肤风团和红斑上,比拉斯汀20 mg与西替利嗪10 mg相比具有等同疗效,可能有更快的抑制作用.比拉斯汀无抗胆碱作用,不影响驾驶,除此之外,比拉斯汀还具备良好的耐受性,无镇静作用、心脏毒性和肝脏毒性等优点.     

息斯敏和息斯敏联合雷尼替丁对组胺诱导人皮肤反应强度的比较

目的探讨组胺Ｈ１和Ｈ２受体拮抗剂联合使用治疗Ⅰ型过敏性疾病的可行性。方法对三组志愿者（每组１２人）分别服用息斯敏１０ｍｇ,１次／ｄ;息斯敏１０ｍｇ和雷尼替丁３００ｍｇ,各１次／ｄ,息斯敏１０ｍｇ,１次／ｄ和雷尼替丁３００ｍｇ,每１２ｈ１次。５天后停雷尼替丁,继续服用息斯敏２天。第１～５天,每日比较服药前和服药后第３ｈ、第６ｈ组胺（１００μｇ）诱导即刻型皮肤（风团和红晕）的反应强度（％）。第８天组胺皮试重复１次。结果息斯敏１０ｍｇ,１次／ｄ和雷尼替丁３００ｍｇ,每１２ｈ１次组对组胺诱导皮肤风团和红晕的反应强度在各个时间点均明显低于息斯敏１０ｍｇ,１次／ｄ组,统计学处理除第２次服药前风团强度无显著性差异外（Ｐ＞０．０５）,其它各时间点均有显著性差异（Ｐ＜０．０１或＜０．０５）。结论息斯敏联合雷尼替丁与息斯敏单独使用相比,明显加快和加强组胺诱导皮肤反应抑制作用,该方案为临床治疗Ⅰ型过敏反应性疾病提供了可行性依据。     

Regulation of wheal and flare by tea tree oil: complementary human and rodent studies

When applied 20 min after injection of histamine into human forearm skin, tea tree oil (TTO) reduces the developing cutaneous vascular response. In this study, the effect of TTO on inflammatory microvascular changes was dissected at the base of an experimental blister on rat skin. 1,8-Cineole, representing 2% of TTO, reduced vascular changes induced by sensory neuropeptides released when the distal portion of a cut sciatic nerve was electrically stimulated. The pre-terminal modulatory effect of 1,8-Cineole was confirmed in tests in sensory-denervated rats. Terpinen-4-ol (approximately 40% TTO) reduced substance P-induced microvascular changes and protein extravasation by a direct nitric oxide-mediated effect on the microvasculature, without sensory nerve involvement. alpha-Terpineol (3% of TTO) regulated both pre- and post-sensory nerve terminals. In human skin, terpinen-4-ol applied 10 min after histamine injection, but not alpha-terpineol or 1,8-cineole, regulated the developing wheal and flare suggesting that the histamine-induced responses in humans (at the dose used in this study, 50 microL of 330 microM histamine) are in large part determined by histamine directly affecting the vasculature via post-terminal-mediated events. The underlying strength of these studies is the use of a well-established rat physiologic model to differentiate the mechanism of regulation of microvascular changes by modulatory agents.     

Involvement of histamine H3 receptors in scratching behaviour in mast cell-deficient mice

BACKGROUND: Although the roles of histamine H3 receptors have been studied in several tissues such as the brain, lung, spleen, colon and peripheral sensory nerve endings, the involvement of H3 receptors in skin responses particularly in relation to scratching behaviour are not well documented. OBJECTIVES: This work was performed to study the effects of histamine H3 antagonists on scratching behaviour in mast cell-deficient mice. METHODS: Histamine H3 antagonists iodophenpropit and clobenpropit, histamine and substance P were injected intradermally into the rostral part of the back of mast cell-deficient (WBB6F1 W/Wv) and wild-type (WBB6F1+/+) mice and scratching behaviour was measured for 60 min. The effects of H1 antagonists on scratching behaviour induced by H3 antagonists were also investigated. RESULTS: Intradermal injection of iodophenpropit and clobenpropit at doses of 10 and 100 nmol per site caused significant increases in scratching behaviour in both mast cell-deficient and wild-type mice. Histamine also caused a dose-related increase in the incidence of scratching behaviour, and a significant effect was observed at a dose of 100 nmol per site in both mast cell-deficient and wild-type mice. Substance P was also effective in causing scratching behaviour in both mast cell-deficient and wild-type mice. However, histamine H1 antagonists diphenhydramine and chlorphenamine failed to inhibit H3 antagonist-induced scratching behaviour in both types of mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that intradermal injection of H3 antagonists induces scratching behaviour and that chemical mediators other than histamine seem to be involved in the response.     

Correlations between histamine-induced wheal,flare and itch

Correlations between the skin reactions wheal and flare and the subjectively reported degree of itch were investigated in response to 1% histamine, intradermally applied by standardized skin prick and by iontophoresis. Experiments were performed with 15 male volunteers using a threefold repeated measures design (skin prick, and iontophoresis with 0.13 mA for 10 s and with 2.0 mA for 10 s). Skin reactions (perpendicular diameters) were determined at the time of their maximum (10 min). Itch was rated on a computerized visual analogue scale which was anchored upon the individual scratch threshold. Most effective in producing itch was the skin prick which caused strong sensations markedly above the scratch threshold during the entire period of measurement (30 min), whereas iontophoresis induced only transient itch sensations. On the other hand, the largest wheals were generated by iontophoresis of both intensities (mean 10 or 14 mm vs 6 mm with skin prick). The higher current induced higher itch, wheal and flare responses, but after eliminating this effect of stimulus intensity, no correlations were found. In contrast, skin prick-induced flare reactions varied with the degree of itch above the scratch threshold ( r = 0.56; P < 0.01). Repeated measurements showed a higher stability for the itch reaction with skin prick compared with iontophoresis. It is hypothesized that in iontophoresis the brief (10-s) histamine bolus passed the most superficial pruritoceptive C fibres too quickly to induce long-lasting itch sensations, whereas the skin prick caused a deposit at the dermal-epidermal junction releasing histamine during the entire time of measurement. Consequently, both the C fibre-mediated itch and the axon reflex flare were more pronounced with the skin prick, and the wheal resulting from a permeability increase in the postcapillary venule walls was an independent phenomenon. Received: 21 June 1995     

Skin reactions and itch sensation induced by epicutaneous histamine application in atopic dermatitis and controls

Itch sensations and skin reactions induced by histamine iontophoresis at six different current intensities were studied in 27 atopic dermatitis (AD) patients and 20 healthy controls. Subjective itch ratings were assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) for 8-min periods after 10-sec histamine application, while changes of skin blood flow were simultaneously measured using two Laser Doppler flowmeters. Ten minutes after each histamine application, the areas of wheal and flare reactions were planimetrically evaluated. When no or weak current was applied, AD patients revealed stronger wheal and flare reactions than controls, possibly due to disturbed skin barrier function. Higher histamine doses, however, produced weaker subjective and vascular reactions in AD patients. In contrast to the controls, AD patients were unable to distinguish between weak and strong histamine stimulation, as shown by their VAS ratings. These results imply that AD patients have an altered histamine response. In particular, their afferent cutaneous nerve fibers show a decreased ability to signal itching to the central nervous system and to release vasoactive neuropeptides upon histamine stimulation.     

Effects of local corticosteroids on acute experimental urticaria

Corticosteroids are often used in the treatment of acute or chronic urticaria. However, their effects on mastocyte activation as well as on the histamine-induced dermal oedema remain poorly investigated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of corticosteroids (CS) on the development of acute experimental urticaria induced by prick-tests with histamine and codeine. This experimental model corresponds to the common form of urticaria. CS were administered at the site of the histamine and codeine prick tests in order to test for a direct effect on the development of acute urticaria. Two types of experiments were performed: 1) after a 48-hour period of topical CS application on the forearm, 7 healthy volunteers were skin prick-tested with histamine and codeine simultaneously in duplicate, one series in the pretreated area and the other in a non-treated area. 2) six other volunteers were prick-tested with histamine and codeine on their forearm, in duplicate. Immediately after testing, intradermal methyprednisolone was injected at the site of the prick-tests in the last series. Skin wheal and flare responses were measured after 20 mns and statistically compared with and without CS treatment. Whereas short-term CS topical application did not appear to modify cutaneous reactivity to histamine and codeine, local CS injection was associated with a significant increase in the flare induced by histamine and codeine (respectively + 18 +/- 3% and + 38 +/- 3%; P = 0.05). The wheal tended to be increased after injected CS. In conclusion, these results show that CS are neither able to prevent nor to improve experimental urticaria, i.e. wheal and flare, and even increase the histamine and codeine-induced erythema. That a similar result could apply to patients with chronic urticaria and with systemic CS remains to be studied.     

Patients with bone marrow failure demonstrate decreased cutaneous reactivity to human C5a

In vivo studies have shown that human C5a, a potent complement-derived anaphylatoxin and chemoattractant, produces immediate inflammatory reactions following intradermal injection in human skin. At concentrations within its potential physiologic range, intradermal injection of C5a elicits immediate wheal and flare reactions, increased vascular permeability, mast cell degranulation, and neutrophil-rich infiltrates. To assess the relative contribution of interacting cellular elements to C5a-induced inflammation in normal human skin, purified human C5a was tested intradermally in 8 patients with bone marrow failure (BMF). Reactions to C5a in patients with BMF were compared with responses at identical test sites in healthy volunteers and other patients with cutaneous disorders. Patients with BMF demonstrated significantly less wheal and flare reactivity following intradermal injection of C5a than controls (p less than 0.05 and less than 0.02, respectively). In these studies, patients with the greatest cytopenia generally showed the least cutaneous reactivity to human C5a. Biopsies of C5a test sites in patients with BMF revealed an absence of leukocytes in marked contrast to neutrophil-rich infiltrates observed at test sites in healthy volunteers. Avidin-fluorescent and/or Giemsa staining of skin biopsies revealed no difference between the number of dermal mast cells in patients with BMF and samples of normal human skin. In addition, skin test studies with histamine (2 micrograms) and morphine (5 micrograms) performed to assess cutaneous vascular and mast cell responsiveness in patients with BMF, normal volunteers and controls with rhinitis revealed no significant differences in cutaneous reactivity to these pharmacologic agents. These in vivo studies demonstrate that patients with BMF specifically exhibit decreased cutaneous reactivity to human C5a and suggest that neutrophils make an important and an immediate contribution to inflammatory responses elicited by this anaphylatoxin.     

Experimental pruritus evoked by platelet activating factor (PAF-acether) in human skin

Cutaneous pruritic effects of synthetic platelet activating factor (PAF-acether) and, in particular, its interference with dermal mast cells, were studied in human volunteers. Intradermal injections of 10-100 ng produced dose-dependent flare and itching responses. The cutaneous reactions were inhibited by local administration of the H1 antihistamine mepyramin. The cutaneous responses were also markedly reduced in histamine-depleted skin. These findings indicate that the cutaneous responses produced by PAF-acether were mediated via an indirect and mainly histamine-dependent mechanism.     

Acute effects of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in human skin--a microdialysis study

Upon activation nociceptors release neuropeptides in the skin provoking vasodilation and plasma protein extravasation in rodents, but only vasodilation in humans. Pivotal peptides in the induction of neurogenic inflammation comprise calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P, the latter being suggested to act partly via degranulation of mast cells. In this study substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide-induced vasodilation, protein extravasation, histamine release, and sensory effects were investigated simultaneously in human skin by dermal microdialysis. The vasodilatory prostaglandin E(2) and the mast cell activator codeine served as positive controls. Substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide applied intradermally via large cut-off plasmapheresis capillaries induced dose-dependent local vasodilation, but only SP provoked protein extravasation in concentrations greater than 10(-9) M. Substance P-induced (10(-8)-10(-6) M) protein extravasation was not accompanied by histamine release and was unaffected by cetirizine (histamine H1 blocker, 200 microg per ml). Only the highest concentration of substance P (10(-5) M) induced significant histamine release. Neither neuropeptide caused any axon reflex erythema or any itch or pain sensation, whereas mast cell degranulation by codeine dose dependently provoked itch, flare, protein extravasation, and histamine release. In human skin calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P induce vasodilation by a mechanism not involving histamine. No evidence for neuropeptide-induced activation of nociceptors was obtained. Our results suggest that endogenous calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P have no acute sensory function in human skin. The lack of neurogenic protein extravasation in humans can most probably be attributed to low local concentrations of this neuropeptide still sufficient to exert trophic and immunomodulatory effects (10(-11) M), but too low to induce protein extravasation (10(-8) M) or even mast cell degranulation (10(-5) M). J Invest Dermatol 115:1015-1020 2000     

Patients' perception of itch induced by histamine, compound 48/80 and wool fibres in atopic dermatitis.

Itch and flare responses were investigated in 32 patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and in 32 healthy controls. Itch was induced chemically by intradermal injections of histamine (1, 3.3, 10 and 100 micrograms/ml) and compound 48/80 (10 micrograms/ml) into non-lesional skin and mechanically by wearing a woollen sweater. Continuous recording of itch intensity allowed the calculation of itch duration (ID), maximal itch intensity (Imax) and a "total itch index" (Tii). The itch responses were significantly increased in AD patients compared with controls for wool fibres and one of the histamine concentrations (10 micrograms/ml), but not for the remaining three histamine concentrations or compound 48/80. Conversely, the flare response was significantly smaller in AD patients than in controls for the two strongest histamine solutions and compound 48/80. Significant dose-response relationships were found between histamine concentration and each of ID, Imax, Tii and flare in both patients and controls. The slope of the flare-regression line was significantly steeper in controls than in AD patients, whereas the slopes of the itch-regression lines did not differ significantly between the two groups, i.e. their ability to discriminate between weak and strong histamine concentrations did not differ significantly. No increased skin mast cell releasability in vivo to compound 48/80 was shown in AD patients compared with controls. The itch and flare responses of AD patients did not correlate significantly with clinical itch intensity, eczema score or serum IgE level.     

Acetylcholine Is an Inducer of Itching in Patients with Atopic Eczema

As previous experimental studies disproved histamine as the main mediator of eliciting pruritus in atopic eczema (AE), we examined the neurocutaneous sensations in 15 patients with AE and in 15 age- and sex-matched non-atopic controls after i.c. injection of acetylcholine (Ach, 0.5 M, 20 μl) or buffered saline. The sensory perceptions were rated by the participants of the study with regard to their quality and intensity using a visual analogue scale. Simultaneously, the vascular reactions to Ach were recorded by the examinators via laser Doppler fluxmetry as well as flare and wheal planimetry. In contrast to the approximately equal flare and wheal extensions in either group, the cutaneous sensations differed significantly. The patients complained of ‘pure’ itching that developed shortly after Ach injection, whereas the control subjects reported only burning pain. Moreover, the patients perceived their sensations significantly earlier and significantly longer than did the controls. The study provides evidence that Ach plays an important role in the pathogeny of pruritus in patients with AE. Further investigations of the neuronal mechanisms involved in this atopy-related effect of Ach have to be performed.     

Topically applied aspirin decreases histamine-induced wheal and flare reactions in normal and SLS-inflamed skin,but does not decrease itch. A randomized,double-blind and placebo-controlled human study

Topically applied aspirin has recently been reported to decrease histamine-induced itch in human volunteers. Our aim is to confirm this and to study the antipruritic ability of topical aspirin in inflamed skin. In 24 non-atopic volunteers, an inflammatory skin reaction was induced in forearm skin at 5 different sites by sodium lauryl sulphate contained in Finn Chambers. Aspirin 10%, aspirin 1%, mepyramine 5% and vehicle were applied to the inflamed and corresponding non-inflamed areas 20 min before itch induction with intradermal histamine injection. Itch and pain were scored on a visual analogue scale at regular intervals. Wheal and flare areas were measured. No difference in itch intensities was found after application of aspirin, mepyramine and vehicle, but more itch was induced in aspirin and mepyramine pretreated sites in inflamed skin compared to normal skin (p<0.05). In normal skin, flare areas were smaller after pretreatment with aspirin 10% (p<0.05) and mepyramine (p<0.001), as were wheal areas after mepyramine (p<0.01), compared to vehicle pretreatments. In inflamed skin, flare areas were smaller after pretreatment with aspirin 10% (p<0.01) and mepyramine (p<0.001), as were wheal areas after aspirin 10% (p<0.01), aspirin 1% (p<0.05) and mepyramine (p<0.001). We conclude that despite a significant skin penetration as measured by the influence on wheal and flare reactions, topically applied aspirin did not decrease histamine-induced itch in the model used.