Anti-transglutaminase antibodies and the serological diagnosis of coeliac disease

Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) has recently been identified as the antigenic target recognised by anti-endomysial antibodies in patients with coeliac disease. In this study, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is used to measure IgA, IgG and IgM antibodies to tTG in patients with coeliac disease and a variety of other inflammatory disorders; and is compared to the standard immunofluorescence test used to detect endomysial antibodies (EMA). In the samples tested, 3% control sera (n=146), 83% EMA-positive sera (n=29), 9% patients with Graves' disease (n=94), 12% antimitochondrial antibody-positive sera (n=53), 11% rheumatoid arthritis patients (n=53) and 22% systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients (n=46) were positive for anti-tTG antibodies. In contrast, none of the controls, 1% of patients with Graves' disease, 2% antimitochondrial antibody-positive sera, 2% rheumatoid arthritis patients and none of the SLE patients were positive for EMA. Measurement of IgG or IgM antibodies to tTG was much less reliable than IgA anti-tTG antibody for the serological diagnosis of coeliac disease. The addition of calcium to the coating buffer improved the assay characteristics of the anti-tTG ELISA. However, the IgA anti-tTG ELISA, with and without calcium, performed less well than the standard EMA test used for the serological diagnosis of coeliac disease. In particular, the anti-tTG ELISA gave a higher rate of non-specific positive reactions.     

Antibody responses to deamidated gliadin peptide show high specificity and parallel antibodies to tissue transglutaminase in developing coeliac disease

Coeliac disease (CD) is an enteropathy induced in genetically susceptible individuals by gluten components, gliadin, hordein and secalin, polypeptides present in cereals such as wheat, barley and rye, respectively. Although the disease starts as intolerance to gliadins, antibodies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) in the gut epithelium are characteristic of the disease. Whereas serum autoantibodies against tTG (tTGA) are highly specific for CD, antibodies to gliadin are less informative as they can also be detected in other enteropathies, and even in healthy individuals. However, it was shown recently that antibodies to certain gliadin peptides occur with high specificity in CD patient sera. We developed a solid phase lanthanide-based immunofluorometric assay for simultaneous detection of serum IgA and IgG antibodies to a synthetic peptide derived from gamma gliadin of wheat comprising amino acids 86-103. Three glutamine residues of this native 18-mer peptide were replaced by glutamic acids and the peptide was biotinylated. Sera from 87 individuals who had undergone duodenal biopsy and were diagnosed with CD and from 81 healthy individuals were analysed for the presence of both IgA and IgG anti-gliadin peptide antibodies. The performance of the peptide AGA assay was excellent, showing a specificity and sensitivity of 90% and 92% for IgA, and 98% and 75% for IgG, respectively. The corresponding values for conventional anti-gliadin antibody (AGA) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests were 72% specificity and 87% sensitivity for IgA, and 64% specificity and 78% sensitivity for IgG. In a prospective study, almost all the tTGA-positive sera drawn from children who later developed CD were also positive for gliadin peptide antibodies.     

Salivary antigliadin and antiendomysium antibodies in coeliac disease

The definitive diagnosis of coeliac disease is based on typical changes in the small intestine biopsy specimens. To screen individuals for coeliac disease serum IgA and IgG antigliadin (AGA), IgA antireticulin (ARA) and IgA antiendomysium (EmA) antibodies are used. The aim of this study was to investigate whether these antibodies can also be detected in saliva as diagnostic markers of coeliac disease. The study population comprised 30 patients with coeliac disease treated with a gluten-free diet, 14 patients with untreated coeliac disease and 13 healthy control subjects. Sera and saliva were tested simultaneously for the presence of IgA and IgG AGA and IgA EmA. None of patients studied had a selective IgA deficiency. There was no significant difference in salivary IgA AGA levels between the three groups tested and there was no correlation between the individual serum and salivary values of IgA AGA. Salivary IgG AGA levels were very low or undetectable. Serum IgA AGA showed a low sensitivity (36.4%) to detect an untreated patient with coeliac disease. All salivary samples, regardless of the study group were negative for IgA EmA. Serum IgA EmAs were universally detected in the sera of patients with newly diagnosed coeliac disease and also in the sera of five of 30 patients with treated coeliac disease. No IgA EmA was detected in the sera of controls. None of the patients studied had a selective IgA deficiency either. Serum IgA EmA is the most sensitive, and IgA and IgG AGA are good indicators for coeliac disease, but salivary IgA or IgG AGA and salivary IgA EmA are not helpful for the diagnosis or follow-up of coeliac disease patients.     

The measurement of IgA and IgG transglutaminase antibodies in celiac disease: a comparison with current diagnostic methods

Celiac disease (CD) is an inflammatory disorder of the small intestine induced by cereal prolamins. The demonstration of IgA endomysial antibodies (EMA) is currently the most reliable serological screen for CD. The antigenic target is transglutaminase. The aim of this study was to develop an ELISA assay for the detection of antibodies to transglutaminase (TGA), and to assess the sensitivity and specificity of TGA for the detection of celiac disease against the benchmarks of jejunal biopsy, antigliadin antibodies (AGA) and EMA. Sera from 57 patients with celiac disease were tested for IgA and IgG TGA, IgA EMA, IgA and IgG AGA, and the total IgA level. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and concordance of AGA, EMA and TGA were assessed against the gold-standard biopsy result. IgG plus IgA TGA offered 100% sensitivity in CD patients for whom no dietary intervention had been commenced, with a specificity of 61%. The sensitivity of TGA dropped from 100 to 79% after dietary restriction. In patients on no gluten restriction, there was 100% agreement between TGA and EMA, and 100% agreement between TGA and AGA for the IgA isotype. The false-positive rate for TGA was 53% in Down's syndrome patients and 25% in patients with systemic autoimmune disorders. We conclude that testing for TGA is a reliable diagnostic serology for celiac disease, with improved sensitivity compared with established methods. The results suggest that serial TGA measurements may be a more and accurate marker for dietary compliance than AGA, but prospective studies are required.     

Tissue transglutaminase autoantibodies in patients with IgM rheumatoid factors

The recent identification of tissue transglutaminase (tTG) as the autoantigen for celiac disease-associated anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) has allowed the use of rapid immunoassay to detect the presence of autoantibodies, anti-tTG, in the serum of patients. In this study, we examined the prevalence of IgG or IgA anti-tTG in sera from patients with elevated levels of IgM rheumatoid factors, which are autoantibodies reactive with the Fc portion of IgG. We report here on four cases of anti-tTG positivity for patients with elevated IgM rheumatoid factor (RF) without evidence of celiac sprue. The study population consisted of 65 patients (26 men, 39 women; mean age, 49 years; range 4 - 92 years) with elevated RF (>20 U/ml ), and 23 healthy subjects (12 men, 11 women; mean age, 46 years; range, 21 - 54 years). IgG and IgA anti- tTG levels were detected using a commercially available ELISA kit (Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Germany). Out of 65 patients, one (1.5%) and three (4.6%) patients were positive for IgG and IgA anti-tTG antibodies, respectively, and this was a higher frequency than occurred in healthy subjects (0/23). The clinical features of the four cases positive for IgG or IgA anti-tTG were as follows: The first case (female, 63 yrs) positive for IgA anti-tTG antibody suffered from rheumatoid arthritis, type II diabetes mellitus, iron deficiency anemia and gastric indigestion without symptoms of malabsorption. She denied any gluten sensitivity on her diet. Her esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy showed mucosal atrophy with no elongated crypts or infiltration of inflammatory cells in the lamina propria. The remaining three cases positive for anti-tTG antibodies had interstitial pneumonia, a herniated lumbar disc, and mild scoliosis, respectively. They all denied any malabsorption symptoms or gluten sensitivity. Jejunal biopsy could not be performed in all four cases.     

The role of antitissue transglutaminase assay for the diagnosis and monitoring of coeliac disease: a French-Italian multicentre study

AIMS: Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) was recently identified as the major autoantigen in coeliac disease. The aim of this multicentre study was to evaluate the impact of a new immunoenzymatic assay for the detection of IgA anti-tGT antibodies. METHODS: Seventy four Italian and French clinical laboratories participated in this study; anti-tTG IgA with an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method using guinea pig liver extract as the coating antigen, anti-endomysium IgA autoantibodies (EMA), and total serum IgA were determined in 7948 patients, 1162 of whom had coeliac disease (737 untreated cases and 425 on a gluten free diet). A proportion of the sera were then sent to a reference laboratory for anti-tTG retesting with an ELISA method using recombinant human tTG antigen. RESULTS: Seven thousand four hundred and fifty eight (93.8%) sera were EMA/antiguinea pig tTG concordant (positive or negative); 490 (6.2%) were non-concordant. The sensitivity of EMA and antiguinea pig tTG in the 737 untreated patients with coeliac disease was 92.1% and 94.8%, respectively, and the specificity was 99.8% and 99.2%, respectively. Retesting of the discordant sera showed that of the 162 sera classified as EMA negative/antiguinea pig tTG positive, only 49 were positive for human recombinant anti-tTG, and that 39 of these were also EMA positive. Furthermore, of the 36 sera classified as EMA positive/antiguinea pig tTG negative, only two were confirmed as EMA positive. CONCLUSIONS: The antiguinea pig tTG assay is more sensitive but less specific than EMA, whereas the antihuman recombinant tTG assay is far more specific and just as sensitive as antiguinea pig tTG. Testing for EMA presents considerable interpretative problems and is difficult to standardise.     

Comparison of tissue transglutaminase-specific antibody assays with established antibody measurements for coeliac disease

Tissue transglutaminase C has recently been identified as one of the auto-antigens of endomysial antibodies found in coeliac disease. In this study we have cloned the human autoantigen and developed immunoassays measuring antibodies to transglutaminase in order to compare their diagnostic performance to that of established markers of the disease. A radiobinding assay using in vitro transcribed and translated 35S-methionine-labelled transglutaminase detected IgG antibodies in 110 and IgA antibodies in 109 of 112 patients at diagnosis of coeliac disease and in three and four of 92 control subjects, respectively. A radiobinding assay measuring both IgG and IgA transglutaminase antibodies identified 111 (99.1%) of the patients and 4 (4.3%) control subjects. Concordance of this assay with the IgA endomysial antibody test was found in 108 patients and 89 control subjects: two patients who had IgA deficiency and a third patient without IgA deficiency were only detected in the radiobinding assay; one patient had weak IgA endomysial antibodies only, and three of the control subjects with weak transglutaminase antibodies by radiobinding assay were undetectable in the IgA endomysial antibody assay. IgA and IgG ELISA using guinea pig transglutaminase and commercial ELISA measuring anti-gliadin antibodies had lower sensitivity and specificity than the radiobinding assays or the IgA endomysial antibody assay. This study confirms tissue transglutaminase C as a major autoantigen in coeliac disease and describes novel radiobinding assays for large scale testing to identify cases of coeliac disease.     

Development of an immunocapture method for measuring IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase in the sera of patients with coeliac disease

One of the most reliable sero-diagnostic tests for coeliac disease (CD) is the measurement, by ELISA, of serum IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) adsorbed to the wells of microtitre plates. In spite of its reliability, however, some discrepancies exist with the results obtained by the antiendomysium histological assay (EMA) and by biopsy the accepted gold standard. Among the reasons for these differences in titres between the ELISA and the last 2 mentioned assays are the conformational changes that proteins undergo on adsorption and the importance of conformational epitopes on tTG for diagnosing CD. To address this problem, a novel procedure was developed using guinea-pig tTG (gptTG) free in solution to interact with IgA antibodies in the sera of CD patients. Any immune complexes so formed are then captured by anti-tTG antibodies preadsorbed to the wells of microtitre plates. This immunocapture method was optimized for the amount of soluble gptTG needed to interact with all the IgA's anti-tTG present in fixed dilutions of serum samples, the amount of rabbit IgG anti-gptTG used to coat the wells of microtitre plates and the order of addition of the reaction components. Comparison of the IgA titres obtained by immunocapture with those by EMA and ELISA (adsorbed tTG) on 9 highly positive and 6 weakly positive sera from clinically characterized CD patients and 5 negative sera from non-CD control subjects revealed that the IgA titres by the immunocapture procedure were well correlated with those obtained by EMA, whereas the titres on ELISA showed discrepancies with both immunocapture and EMA.     

Efficiency of various serological techniques for diagnosing Coxiella burnetii infection

An indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using a recently developed commercial kit for detecting antibodies against Coxiella burnetii (C.b.), the etiological agent of Q fever, has been evaluated using human field serum samples. The IFA was compared with an ELISA and a complement fixation test (CFT). The IFA was based on the corpuscular C.b. phase I and phase II antigens specific to anti-C.b. phase I and II antibodies, respectively. Fifty sera from persons with symptoms of Q fever were examined in this study. The IFA compared with the ELISA showed the sensitivities of 97.7% and 87.2% for IgG and 66.7% and 60.0% for IgM phase II and I antibodies, respectively and the specificities of 100% and 90.0% for IgG and 75.9% and 64.7% for IgM phase II and phase I antibodies, respectively. Due to a limited number of sera positive in the IgA antibody testing, the data presented should be considered with caution. It appears that the IFA strikes a very good balance between high specificity and sensitivity with phase II and phase I IgG antibodies and a less satisfactory one with IgM antibodies. The CFT failed in one of the above aspects showing a good specificity but a poor sensitivity, especially for phase I antibodies. The study demonstrated that the IFA is suitable for diagnosing Q fever and its therapeutic follow-up and is a good candidate for screening sera in large numbers. A certain limitation, especially in testing early stages of the chronic disease, could be a low fluorescence intensity of the IgA positive control in comparison with the IgA negative one.     

Relevance of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies in coeliac disease diagnosis

Coeliac disease is precipitated upon exposure to the dietary wheat gluten. Definitive diagnosis relies on intestinal biopsy and regression of clinical and histological disorders with adherence to a gluten-free diet. Coeliac disease is usually associated with a malabsorption syndrome. However, both atypical and silent clinical forms have been recently described and prevalence of the disease may be under-estimated. Serological tests have been developed in order to select candidates for intestinal biopsy, but these biological parameters are not suitable for screening in the general population. Indeed, antigliadin IgG antibodies have a poor specificity. antigliadin IgA antibodies a poor sensitivity. The detection of antiendomysial IgA antibodies (EmA) by immunofluorescence, although considered as the "gold standard" of serological coeliac disease markers, could not be automated, depends on a subjective fluorescence display, and may be limited by the degree of training of the observer. In year 1997, tissue transglutaminase (tTg) has been identified as the main autoantigen recognized by EmA. On this basis, solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Elisa) have been developed in order to potentially replace the EmA assay. Several commercial kits are now available but their diagnostic performances have not yet been compared. We selected 75 sera, including sera from 26 patients with coeliac disease in order to evaluate five commercial anti-tTG Elisa kits. For all patients, treated or not, detection of anti-tTG antibodies with four of the five tested kits correlates with EmA test. Kits using human tTG have the highest specificity, equivalent to the value of EMA test, and widely better than antigliadin antibodies. Anti-tTG Elisa kits using human tTG may be used as an alternative way to the EmA assay in the next future, and may supplant IgA anti-gliadin antibodies for coeliac disease screening.     

Performance of three microimmunofluorescence assays for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae immunoglobulin M,G, and A antibodies

The microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test is considered the "gold standard" for laboratory diagnosis of acute and chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. The performance of a MIF test based on C. pneumoniae antigen from Washington Research Foundation (WRF) was compared with those of assays from Labsystems (LAB) and MRL Diagnostics (MRL) by investigation of sera from three groups of patients: group I, 83 sera from 28 patients with atypical pneumonia; group II, 37 sera from 16 patients with acute C. pneumoniae or Chlamydia psittaci respiratory tract infection confirmed by PCR or culture; group III, 100 sera from 100 persons enrolled in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. The accordance among the results of the WRF assay and the two commercial assays was excellent for the immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody detection rate (98%). The accordance in detection rates for IgG and IgA antibodies in sera from patients with acute infections was acceptable (87 and 88%), and in sera from group III, it was excellent (95 and 97%). The determinations of endpoint titers were reproducible with <1 dilution step difference for all three methods, except that the mean IgM antibody titer found by the LAB assay was almost 2 dilution steps higher than that found by the other two methods. Although the three assays use different C. pneumoniae strains as antigens, the detection rates and IgG and IgA endpoint titers were similar. The difference in endpoint titers of IgM antibodies is of no major concern, as the diagnosis of acute C. pneumoniae infection rests on the presence of IgM antibodies, not on their level.     

Diagnosis and classification of celiac disease and gluten sensitivity

Celiac disease is a complex disorder, the development of which is controlled by a combination of genetic (HLA alleles) and environmental (gluten ingestion) factors. New diagnostic guidelines developed by ESPGHAN emphasize the crucial role of serological tests in the diagnostic process of symptomatic subjects, and of the detection of HLA DQ2/DQ8 alleles in defining a diagnosis in asymptomatic subjects belonging to at-risk groups. The serological diagnosis of CD is based on the detection of class IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) and anti-endomysial antibodies. In patients with IgA deficiency, anti-tTG or anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibody assays of the IgG class are used. When anti-tTG antibody levels are very high, antibody specificity is absolute and CD can be diagnosed without performing a duodenum biopsy. Non-celiac gluten sensitivity is a gluten reaction in which both allergic and autoimmune mechanisms have been ruled out. Diagnostic criteria include the presence of symptoms similar to those of celiac or allergic patients; negative allergological tests and absence of anti-tTG and EMA antibodies; normal duodenal histology; evidence of disappearance of the symptoms with a gluten-free diet; relapse of the symptoms when gluten is reintroduced.     

IgG anti-tTG responses in different autoimmune conditions differ in their epitope targets and subclass usage

Antibodies of the IgA class directed against the enzyme tissue transglutaminase (tTG) are highly specific for coeliac disease (CD). IgG antibodies to tTG also occur in CD, and have also been reported in autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes mellitus and Crohn’s disease. In comparison to the IgA anti-tTG response, little is known of the IgG anti-tTG response in terms of epitope specificity and IgG subclass usage. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare epitopes recognised by CD and non-CD IgG anti-tTG antibodies, and determine the relative proportions of the IgG subclasses comprising this response. IgG anti-tTG positive individuals who did not have CD were identified by screening groups of patients with type I diabetes mellitus, Crohn’s disease and granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Results from ELISA blocking experiments and mutant tTG antigens demonstrate that non-CD IgG anti-tTG bind different epitopic determinants to CD IgG anti-tTG. The IgG subclass usage of coeliac disease and type 1 diabetes was dominated by IgG1, whereas this IgG subclass was infrequently a component of the IgG anti-tTG response in diseases such as granulomatosis with polyangiitis and Crohn’s disease. The differences in epitope specificity and subclass usage of IgG anti-tTG observed between CD and non-CD individuals may be due to the differing mechanisms underlying tTG autoimmunity.     

Evaluation of a Commercial IgG/IgM Western Blot Assay for Early Postnatal Diagnosis of Congenital Toxoplasmosis

The aim of this study was to evaluate a commercial Western blot IgG/IgM assay for use in the early serological diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. This assay compares the immunological profile of mother and infant and allows differentiation between passive transmitted maternal antibodies and newly synthesized antibodies of the infant within the first 3 months of life. Over a 6-year period (1995–2001), the sera from 169 mothers and their 175 offspring (6 had twins) were examined for specific anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or an immunosorbent agglutination assay. All mothers had primary Toxoplasma infection during pregnancy. Serological and clinical follow-up of the infants during the first year of life confirmed 36 cases of congenital toxoplasmosis. In 139 cases, infection could be ruled out. Three hundred fifty-one paired samples from 175 mother-child pairs were tested retrospectively for IgG and IgM patterns by Toxoplasma Western blot IgG/IgM (LDBIO Diagnostics, France). The results of conventional serological analysis (immunosorbent agglutination assay or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) to detect IgM or IgA were compared with the results of the Toxoplasma Western blot IgG/IgM on samples obtained within the first 3 months of life. The performance of the combination of the two methods was also assessed. At birth, the sensitivity values of conventional serological analysis and the Toxoplasma Western blot were 52% and 67%, with specificity values being 99% and 96%, respectively. Combination of the Western blot and conventional serological analysis increased the sensitivity at birth to 78% and within the first 3 months of life to 85%. Overall, the combination of both methods detected 94% of congenital infections. Therefore, this commercial Western blot represents a useful tool for early postnatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. Electronic Publication     

B cell epitopes of gliadin

A phage displayed dodecapeptide library and synthetic octapeptides spanning the complete sequence of alpha- and gamma-type gliadin and overlapping in six amino acids (pepscan) were screened for binding to human gliadin antibodies (AGA). Phage display experiments led to four sequences recognized with significantly higher frequency by sera with raised IgA-AGA titres than by control sera. All these peptides contained the core sequence PEQ. Pepscan experiments revealed binding of AGA to five prominent regions: (i) QXQPFP (binding to IgG and IgA, X representing P, Q, and L); (ii) IPEQ (IgG) and WQIPEQ (IgA); (iii) FFQP (IgG) and QGXFQP (IgA, X representing F and S); (iv) PQQLPQ (IgG and IgA), all in alpha-type gliadin; and (v) QPQQPF (IgG and IgA) in gamma-type gliadin. In two of the sequences (QPQQPF and QQQPFP), substitution of Q by E resulting in QPEQPF and QEQPFP, respectively, increased significantly binding of AGA from sera of patients with biopsy-proven or suspected coeliac disease (CoD), all positive for endomysium antibodies (EmA). In contrast, binding of sera with high AGA titre from EmA-negative patients (CoD and dermatitis herpetiformis excluded) was not enhanced by this substitution. Thus, AGA directed against these modified epitopes can be regarded as specific for CoD. This is the first study demonstrating that deamidation of gliadin improves reactivity of AGA of CoD patients.     

Performance of Three Microimmunofluorescence Assays for Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae Immunoglobulin M, G, and A Antibodies

The microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test is considered the “gold standard” for laboratory diagnosis of acute and chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. The performance of a MIF test based on C. pneumoniae antigen from Washington Research Foundation (WRF) was compared with those of assays from Labsystems (LAB) and MRL Diagnostics (MRL) by investigation of sera from three groups of patients: group I, 83 sera from 28 patients with atypical pneumonia; group II, 37 sera from 16 patients with acute C. pneumoniae or Chlamydia psittaci respiratory tract infection confirmed by PCR or culture; group III, 100 sera from 100 persons enrolled in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. The accordance among the results of the WRF assay and the two commercial assays was excellent for the immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody detection rate (98%). The accordance in detection rates for IgG and IgA antibodies in sera from patients with acute infections was acceptable (87 and 88%), and in sera from group III, it was excellent (95 and 97%). The determinations of endpoint titers were reproducible with <1 dilution step difference for all three methods, except that the mean IgM antibody titer found by the LAB assay was almost 2 dilution steps higher than that found by the other two methods. Although the three assays use different C. pneumoniae strains as antigens, the detection rates and IgG and IgA endpoint titers were similar. The difference in endpoint titers of IgM antibodies is of no major concern, as the diagnosis of acute C. pneumoniae infection rests on the presence of IgM antibodies, not on their level.     

A comparison of 13 guinea pig and human anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody ELISA kits

AIMS: Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) is a major autoantigen recognised by IgA anti-endomysial antibodies (IgA EMA). Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgA tTG) have therefore been developed as an alternative serological screening test to IgA EMA for coeliac disease (CD). The use of human tTG (h-tTG), as opposed to guinea pig liver tTG (gpl-tTG), in these assays has been reported to produce superior results. This study compared 13 commercial IgA tTG ELISA kits to ascertain their performance characteristics in the diagnosis of CD in patients with biopsy confirmed disease compared with controls. All patients and controls were adults aged 21 years or older. METHODS: Sera from the following groups of patients were tested in each kit: (1) 49 patients with CD confirmed on small bowel biopsies (all IgA EMA positive); (2) 34 patients with small bowel biopsies that were not consistent with CD; and (3) 30 patients with biopsy confirmed inflammatory bowel disease. All controls were negative for IgA EMA and were not IgA deficient. Sensitivities and specificities were determined using both the manufacturers' recommended cut off points and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis derived decision thresholds. The area under the curve (AUC) for each ROC plot was also calculated and compared between kits. RESULTS: In general, the h-tTG based IgA tTG ELISA kits demonstrated superior performance (especially specificity) compared with the gpl-tTG based kits, although 100% sensitivity and specificity (comparable to the IgA EMA assay) was obtained in only one recombinant h-tTG based kit. CONCLUSIONS: The use of h-tTG in IgA tTG ELISA kits is generally, but not universally, associated with superior performance. Factors other than antigen source are important in determining kit performance.     

Human serum antibody response inCampylobacter jejuni enteritis as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

An ELISA for detection of IgG, IgA, and IgM antibody using an acid-glycine extract from Campylobacter jejuni as antigen was developed. To determine the value of this assay for the diagnosis of acute Campylobacter jejuni infections, the IgG, IgA, and IgM immune response against Campylobacter jejuni was investigated at various timepoints after infection in patients with culture-proven infection. A total of 112 sera from 46 patients and 78 sera from a control group were tested. All but one of the 46 patients with culture-proven Campylobacter jejuni enteritis developed IgG antibodies against Campylobacter jejuni. IgA and IgM ELISA both showed 97% specificity, and sensitivity of 63% and 30% respectively. IgG antibody titers generally remained at a constant level for more than 50 days, whereas IgA and IgM antibody titers declined more rapidly to normal values within 30 to 50 days after onset of clinical symptoms. Detection of Campylobacter jejuni specific IgA antibodies in a single serum sample provided the most useful assay for serological diagnosis of Campylobacter jejuni enteritis. The presence of Campylobacter jejuni specific IgM antibodies was the sole diagnostic criterion in three cases. Serological diagnosis of Campylobacter jejuni enteritis should therefore include both IgA and IgM antibody determination.     

Diagnostic Relevance and Clinical Significance of the New Enhanced Performance M2 (MIT3) ELISA for the Detection of IgA and IgG Antimitochondrial Antibodies in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

Background/aims: Antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs) are the serological hallmark of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a new M2 enhanced performance enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (MIT3) for the detection of IgG- and IgA-specific isotypes of AMA in PBC patients including a number of PBC patients negative for AMA by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) as well as in patients with diverse, non-PBC disorders. We also investigated the clinical significance of IgG and IgA AMA in PBC. Methods: One hundred and three Greek PBC patients including 27 with AMA IIF-negative at the time of the investigation, 29 with autoimmune hepatitis-1 (AIH-1), 12 with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), 26 with hepatitis C virus (HCV), 15 with hepatitis B virus (HBV), and 29 healthy were investigated for AMA (IgG and IgA) using the MIT3-based ELISAs (INOVA Diagnostics, San Diego, CA). The samples were also tested by conventional anti-M2 ELISA (INOVA Diagnostics, Inc.). Results: The IgG MIT3-based ELISA significantly increased AMA detection in the cohort of PBC patients, over 26% of whom were AMA IIF-negative, from 63.1% by the conventional anti-M2, and 73.7% by IIF to 79.6% by MIT3-based ELISA (p<0.001). IgA AMAs were detected in 47.6% patients. Overall, IgG/IgA AMAs were detected in 84/103 (81.6%). IgG MIT3-based ELISA detected 12/27 IIF AMA-negative samples (44.4%), while IgG/IgA MIT3-based ELISAs detected 13/27 IIF AMA-negative patients (48.1%). The specificities of MIT3-based ELISAs (IgG and IgA) were 82.8% and 89.7%, respectively, in AIH-1, 100% and 93.3%, respectively, in HBV, 100% in PSC, and 96% and 93.3%, respectively, in HCV. Patients positive for IgG AMA had significantly more severe disease as shown by worse histology and elevated biochemical markers; IgG and IgA AMA titers were associated positively with the Mayo risk score but none of the isotypes were able to predict disease outcome. Conclusions: The new IgG and IgA MIT3-based ELISAs seem to have higher specificity and sensitivity for AMA detection than IIF and the conventional anti-M2. Interestingly, these assays were able to unmask AMA presence in almost half of the AMA-negative samples by IIF. These findings may suggest the use of MIT3-based ELISAs as first-line investigation for AMA detection, particularly, when the laboratories are unfamiliar with the use and interpretation of the IIF patterns of AMA. The presence of IgG AMA seems to characterize PBC patients with more severe disease, but both IgG and IgA isotypes of AMAs were not predictive markers of disease outcome.     

Evaluation of 12 commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Barr virus-specific and heterophile antibodies

Ten microbiological departments in Norway have participated in a multicenter evaluation of the following commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific and heterophile antibodies: CAPTIA Select viral capsid antigen (VCA)-M/G/EBNA (Centocor Inc.), Enzygnost anti-EBV/immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG (Dade Behring), Vironostika EBV VCA IgM/IgG/EBNA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Organon Teknika), SEROFLUOR immunofluorescence assay and EBV Combi-Test (Institute Virion Ltd.), anti-EBV recombinant IgM- and IgG-early antigen/EBNA IgG ELISA (Biotest Diagnostics), EBV IgM/IgG/EBNA ELISA (Gull Laboratories), Paul-Bunnell-Davidsohn test (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur), Monosticon Dri-Dot (Organon Teknika), Avitex-IM (Omega Diagnostics Ltd.), Alexon Serascan infectious mononucleosis test (Alexon Biomedical Inc. ), Clearview IM (Unipath Ltd.), and Cards+/-OS Mono (Pacific Biotech, Inc.). The test panel included sera from patients with primary EBV infection, immunocompromised patients with recent cytomegalovirus infection, healthy persons (blood donors), and EBV-seronegative persons. Among the tests for EBV-specific antibodies the sensitivity was good, with only small differences between the different assays. However, there was a greater variation in specificity, which varied between 100% (Enzygnost) and 86% (Biotest). Tests for detection of heterophile antibodies based on purified or selected antigen (Avitex, Alexon, Clearview IM, and Cards+/-OS Mono) were more sensitive than the Paul-Bunnell-Davidsohn and Monosticon tests.