Intravenous nizatidine kinetics and acid suppression

The effectiveness of intravenous nizatidine in suppressing gastric acid secretion was evaluated by different methods of inducing secretion in two single-blind studies. In study 1, seven subjects were given single, 20-min intravenous infusions of nizatidine (6.25, 25, 75, 150, or 250 mg) before modified sham feeding (MSF). Gastric acid suppression after nizatidine was contrasted with that after placebo and MSF. All doses of nizatidine reduced secretion; the 150- and 250-mg doses of nizatidine suppressed secretion for at least 2.5 hr. In study 2, eight subjects received one 5-min intravenous infusion of placebo, cimetidine (300 mg), or nizatidine (25, 50, 100, or 250 mg) weekly for 6 wk. Secretion was induced by infusing pentagastrin (2 micrograms/kg/hr) 45 min before the study drug was dosed and for 3.5 hr thereafter. Again, all doses of nizatidine reduced gastric acid, chiefly by decreasing volume. Nizatidine induced a clear dose-response effect; nizatidine (100 mg) and cimetidine (300 mg) had approximately equal suppressive effects. Nizatidine (100 mg) and cimetidine (300 mg) reduced acid output by 62% and 63% and reduced volume of secretion by 48% and 51% over the 3.5-hr period. Gastric acid suppression and plasma nizatidine concentrations were directly related. Nizatidine kinetics were linear and proportional to dose. The t1/2 was 1.3 hr (range 0.7 to 2.1 hr), the volume of distribution was 1.2 +/- 0.5 l/kg, and clearance was 0.6 +/- 0.2 l/kg/hr. Laboratory abnormalities and side effects were minor in both studies.     

Reassessment of the single intravenous injection method with inulin for measurement of the glomerular filtration rate in man.

1. Factors influencing the total body and renal clearances of inulin were investigated in a total of 37 healthy adult volunteers and 10 patients with stable chronic renal failure after the single intravenous injection of a dose of 70 mg/kg given over 5 min. 2. The elimination of inulin was highly concentration-dependent, and in healthy volunteers the renal clearance fell from 103.7 +/- 14.4 ml min-1 1.73 m-2 during the first hour after administration to 49.1 +/- 20.9 ml min-1 1.73 m-2 over the period 6-8 h. In the patients with renal failure the renal clearance fell correspondingly from 39.7 +/- 16.5 to 26.6 +/- 8.6 ml min-1 1.73 m-2. There were no changes in the simultaneously measured clearances of creatinine. 3. The values obtained for the total body clearance of inulin after a single injection depend critically on dose, the number and timing of blood samples, the choice of pharmacokinetic model, the number of data points chosen for estimation of the slope of the terminal elimination phase for analysis by the methods of residuals, and the weighting used for curve fitting by non-linear regression analysis. 4. With standardized conditions of sampling from 0 to 2 h and weighted non-linear regression analysis of the plasma concentration-time data, the total body and renal clearances of inulin were almost identical in subjects with normal renal function at 105.2 +/- 10.2 and 102.9 +/- 13.0 ml min-1 1.73 m-2. In the patients with chronic renal failure sampling was continued for 3 h and the corresponding clearances were 40.4 +/- 15.3 and 38.9 +/- 15.7 ml min-1 1.73 m-2. 5. The 0-2 h total body and renal clearances of inulin were measured by the single injection method and the renal clearance was measured by the standard constant infusion method on different occasions in 10 healthy volunteers. The respective clearances were similar at 101.4 +/- 6.6, 94.9 +/- 11.9 and 88.4 +/- 12.1 ml min-1 1.73 m-2. 6. The reproducibility of the single injection and constant infusion methods was compared by measuring the inulin clearance with both techniques on three occasions in separate groups of eight and nine healthy volunteers. The mean coefficient of variation for the total body clearance with the single injection method was only 3.9% compared with 9.5% for the renal clearance determined the same way and 12.0% for the renal clearance during constant infusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Imipenem pharmacokinetics in patients with burns

The pharmacokinetics of imipenem were studied in 11 adult patients with severe burns who were receiving a therapeutic regimen of imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg intravenously every 6 hours. Serial blood samples for measuring imipenem and 24-hour urine collections for creatinine clearance (CrCl) were obtained after the initial dose and after multiple dosing. Plasma was assayed for imipenem by use of HPLC. A two-compartment model provided a superior fit to the data compared with a one-compartment model in 9 of the 11 patients. There was no significant difference in any pharmacokinetic parameter between the initial dose and after multiple dosing (p greater than 0.05). Combined mean (+/- SD) parameter estimates for the two dosing periods were as follows: VC, 0.11 +/- 0.06 L/kg; Vss, 0.22 +/- 0.06 L/kg; CL, 12.5 +/- 3.6 L/hr/1.73 m2; t1/2 alpha, 0.18 +/- 0.13 hr; t1/2 beta, 1.12 +/- 0.44 hr. Mean clearance in two patients with creatinine clearance values greater than 150 ml/min/1.73 m2 was 17.7 L/hr/1.73 m2. Mean clearance in two patients with creatinine clearance values less than 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 was 8.5 L/hr/1.73 m2. No pharmacokinetic parameter was significantly different from previously reported parameters in normal volunteers (p greater than 0.05). Creatinine clearance ranged from 17 to 218 ml/min/1.73 m2. Imipenem clearance was significantly related to creatinine clearance (CL = 63 + 0.059 CLCR; r2 = 0.60, p = 0.001). No significant association was found between total body surface area burns and imipenem clearance (p greater than 0.05). Our data suggest imipenem pharmacokinetics in patients with burns are comparable to those in normal volunteers although substantial intersubject variability exists.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in varying degrees of renal function

The pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin, a new glycopeptide antibiotic with activity against aerobic gram-positive bacteria, were characterized after intravenous administration of a single 3 mg/kg dose in five healthy volunteers and six patients with various degrees of stable renal insufficiency. Serum and urine samples were collected during a 15-day period and drug concentrations were assayed microbiologically. The mean elimination half-life of teicoplanin was 162.6 +/- 69.8 hours in healthy volunteers and was prolonged with decreased renal function. The mean plasma and renal clearances of teicoplanin in healthy subjects were 11.4 +/- 1.5 ml/min and 10.0 +/- 1.0 ml/min, respectively. Both values decreased in patients with renal failure and correlated significantly with measured creatinine clearances (r2 = 0.938 and 0.884, respectively). A nomogram for dosage adjustment in patients with varying degrees of renal failure is presented.     

Secretion of nizatidine into human breast milk after single and multiple doses

Disposition of the H2-receptor antagonist nizatidine was studied in serum, urine, and breast milk. Five lactating women and five nonlactating women participated; the disposition of nizatidine was studied in three of the lactating women. Single and multiple doses of 150 mg nizatidine were administered orally. The disposition of nizatidine (half-life, 1 1/2 hours; apparent serum clearance, 40 L/hr; renal clearance, 27 L/hr; and apparent volume of distribution, 1.4 L/kg) was similar in lactating and nonlactating women. These pharmacokinetic results were analogous to observations for men in other studies. Nizatidine breast milk concentrations were directly proportional to corresponding serum concentrations. On average, 96 micrograms nizatidine, less than 0.1% of the maternal dose, was secreted into milk during a 12-hour interval after either single or multiple doses.     

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous cefetamet and oral cefetamet pivoxil in patients with renal insufficiency.

The pharmacokinetics of cefetamet after a short intravenous infusion of cefetamet (515 mg) and oral administration of 1,000 mg of cefetamet pivoxil were studied in 9 healthy subjects and in 38 patients with various degrees of renal impairment. The results showed that cefetamet elimination was dependent on renal function. After intravenous dosing, total body (CLS), renal (CLR), and nonrenal (CLNR) clearances were linearly related to creatinine clearance (CLCR; r = 0.95, 0.92, and 0.59, respectively). Elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) was prolonged from 2.46 +/- 0.33 h in normal subjects to 29.1 +/- 13.9 h in patients with CLCR of less than 10 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Correspondingly, CLS and CLR decreased from 1.77 +/- 0.27 and 1.42 +/- 0.25 ml/min per kg to 0.14 +/- 0.04 and 0.04 +/- 0.03 ml/min per kg, respectively. The volume of distribution at steady state (0.298 +/- 0.049 liter/kg) for cefetamet was not altered by renal insufficiency (P greater than 0.05). After oral administration, the elimination parameters, t1/2 beta and CLR, were insignificantly different from the intravenous data (P greater than 0.05). Furthermore, the bioavailability (F) of cefetamet pivoxil (45 +/- 13%) was not altered by renal failure (P greater than 0.05). However, maximum concentration in plasma and the time to achieve this value were significantly increased (5.86 +/- 0.74 versus 14.8 +/- 6.14 micrograms/ml and 3.9 +/- 1.1 versus 8.4 +/- 1.7 h, respectively; P less than 0.05). Based on these observations, it is recommended that patients with CLcr of <10 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and between 10 and 39 ml/min per 1.73 m2 be given one-quarter of the normal daily dose either once or twice daily. Patients with CLcr between 40 and 80 ml/min per 1.73 m2 should receive one-half of the normal dose twice daily. For patients with CLcr of <10 ml/min per 1.73 m2, it would be recommended that they receive a normal standard dose as a loading dose on day 1 of treatment.     

Pharmacokinetics of cefotiam in patients with impaired renal function and in those undergoing hemodialysis.

The pharmacokinetics of cefotiam were studied after a single intravenous 1.0-g dose to 18 subjects grouped according to their creatinine clearances (CLCR); CLCR was above 75, 75 to 20, and below 20 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Cefotiam obeyed two-compartment model kinetics in all three groups. The volume of distribution based on the area under serum concentration-time curve (Varea) was renal function independent, the average value being 0.350 +/- 0.159 liters/kg. The elimination-phase half-life (t1/2 beta) was 0.916 +/- 0.090 h in group 1, 2.03 +/- 1.62 h in group 2, and 7.09 +/- 3.06 h in group 3. Cumulative 24-h urinary excretion accounted for 65 to 93% of the dose in four subjects with CLCRS above 80 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and 19 to 41% in three subjects with CLCRS below 20 ml/min per 1.73 m2. We give recommendations for dosage adjustment in patients with renal insufficiency. The effect of hemodialysis on cefotiam pharmacokinetics was studied in six patients in end-stage renal failure; hemodialysis shortened the average t1/2 beta from 8.02 +/- 4.04 h to 2.74 +/- 2.15 h. We estimated that in a hypothetical anephric patient with a body weight of 60 kg, 6-h hemodialysis would remove 49.7% of the drug present in the body at the start of dialysis.     

Pharmacokinetics of moxalactam in subjects with normal and impaired renal function

The pharmacokinetics of moxalactam were investigated in five subjects with normal renal function and 21 uremic patients. Normal subjects were given intravenous doses of 7.5 and 15 mg of the drug per kg as bolus injections (1 min) and 30 mg of the drug per kg as a 20-min infusion. Pharmacokinetic data, calculated by using a two-compartment open body model, were similar for the three intravenous doses: the t 1/2 alpha value was within 0.12 to 0.20 h, the t 1/2 beta value was 1.98 to 2.05 h, the central distribution volume (Vc) was 3.81 to 7.04 liters/1.73 m2, and the apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) was 9.12 to 13.36 liters/1.73 m2, i.e., 13.7 to 20.2% of the body weight. From 82.0 to 97.7% of the dose was recovered, in unchanged form, in urine during 24 h. After a single intramuscular dose of 15 mg/kg in the same subjects with normal renal function, the mean peak serum levels, occurring at 0.95 +/- 0.37 h, were 48.28 +/- 11.81 microgram/ml, the t 1/2 beta value was 2.22 +/- 0.16 h, the renal clearance (CR) was 87.5 +/- 9.4 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and 96.9 +/- 12.7% of the injected dose was found in 24-h urine. Pharmacokinetic data were similar for the two routes of administration. In uremic patients, the t 1/2 beta increased according to the severity of renal failure; it was 4.83 h in patients with creatinine clearances (Ccr) within 30 to 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, 8.42 h for Ccr values within 10 to 30 ml/min, and 18.95 h in hemodialysis patients. During a 4- to 6-h dialysis session, the t 1/2 beta value was 3.65 h and 51% of the drug was removed by dialysis. The apparent volume of distribution at steady state increased in patients with Ccr values below 10 ml/min; serum and renal clearances decreased in uremic patients, and the nonrenal clearances remained constant in all these patients. From these pharmacokinetic results, linear relationships were found between the kinetic data and the biological parameters of the glomerular filtration rate. Dosage schedules were established, adapted to the degree of renal impairment.     

Pharmacokinetics of cefixime (CL 284,635; FK 027) in healthy subjects and patients with renal insufficiency.

The pharmacokinetics of the extended-half-life, broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin cefixime (CL 284,635; FK 027) were studied in 7 healthy volunteers and 35 patients with various degrees of renal insufficiency, including patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis. Apparent total body, renal, and apparent nondialysis-nonrenal clearances and protein binding declined and elimination half-life increased with decreasing creatinine clearance. All of these alterations became statistically significant as the creatinine clearance fell below 20 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Cefixime concentrations in urine exceeded the MICs for most urinary tract pathogens for up to 24 h postdose, even in patients with severe renal insufficiency. CAPD removed an insignificant fraction of cefixime body burden over the 72-h study period (1.57 +/- 0.60% [mean +/- the standard error of the mean]). Area under the curve data suggested that hemodialysis similarly removed an insignificant fraction of the cefixime body burden. Volume of distribution at steady state was not altered significantly by renal insufficiency. It is recommended that standard doses of cefixime be administered at extended intervals, especially in patients with creatinine clearances less than 20 ml/min per 1.73 m2. In addition, supplemental doses are not necessary during CAPD and at the end of hemodialysis.     

Pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered ciprofloxacin in patients with various degrees of renal function.

We examined the pharmacokinetic behavior of 200 mg of ciprofloxacin administered intravenously to 32 volunteers whose renal function as measured by creatinine clearance ranged from 0 to 8.99 liters/h per 1.73 m2. Serum clearances (mean +/- standard deviation) were 26.8 +/- 5.7 and 15.4 +/- 4.3 liters/h per 1.73 m2 in normal and anephric volunteers, respectively. The half-life (mean +/- standard deviation) increased from 4.3 +/- 0.8 h in normal volunteers to 8.6 +/- 3.3 h in anephric volunteers. There was good correlation between normalized creatinine clearance and both normalized serum and renal clearance. The regression equation for serum clearance (CLS) versus creatinine clearance (CLCR) was CLS = 1.97 X CLCR + 13.23, where r = 0.697; for renal clearance versus creatinine clearance, the equation was CLR = 2.26 X CLCR, where r = 0.845. On the basis of these data, we recommend a maximum 50% reduction in dose when ciprofloxacin is instituted at a renal function of 1.2 to 1.8 liters/h per 1.73 m2 (20 to 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Because of the observed variation in ciprofloxacin half-life in our anephric volunteers, we also recommend that a schedule of administration every 12 h be maintained, even for patients without urine output.     

Differential effect of chronic renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in patients receiving and not receiving hemodialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The effect of chronic renal failure (CRF) on the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine, a drug cleared almost exclusively by hepatic metabolism, has thus far only been evaluated in patients undergoing regular hemodialysis. This study had 2 objectives: (1) to investigate the effect of CRF on the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in both patients undergoing hemodialysis and patients not undergoing hemodialysis and (2) to test the effects of plasma from the patients examined and of lidocaine metabolites possibly accumulated in vivo on lidocaine biotransformation in vitro. METHODS: In a clinical investigation we studied the kinetics of lidocaine and its metabolites, monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and glycinexylidide (GX), after intravenous injection of 1 mg/kg lidocaine in 15 healthy volunteers (creatinine clearance [CL(cr)] >80 mL/min x 1.73 m(-2)), 10 subjects with moderate renal insufficiency (CL(cr) between 30 and 60 mL/min x 1.73 m(-2)), 10 subjects with severe renal insufficiency (CL(cr) <30 mL/min x 1.73 m(-2)), and 10 functionally anephric patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. In experiments in vitro we determined the effects of plasma and GX on the formation rate of the primary lidocaine metabolite, MEGX, by use of human liver microsomes. RESULTS: In patients not undergoing hemodialysis, lidocaine kinetic parameters were altered in proportion to the degree of renal function impairment, but only in patients with severe renal insufficiency were differences statistically significant: clearance was about half that of control subjects (mean +/- SD, 6.01 +/- 2.54 mL/min x kg versus 11.87 +/- 2.97 mL/min x kg; P < .001), and half-life was approximately doubled (4.55 +/- 1.71 hours versus 2.24 +/- 0.55 hours, P < .001). No such alterations were observed in patients undergoing regular hemodialysis, whose values were similar to those of the control group. The steady-state volume of distribution and MEGX levels were independent of renal function, whereas GX levels were more than double those of control subjects (P < .05) in all CRF groups. No inhibitory effect of plasma was observed, for any of the subjects examined, on lidocaine biotransformation in vitro. GX was found to be a competitive inhibitor, but its apparent inhibition constant value (52 +/- 6 micromol/L) was 2 orders of magnitude higher than its concentrations in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Our in vivo findings have both clinical and methodologic implications: (1) Lidocaine dose adjustment may be required in patients with severe renal insufficiency who are not receiving hemodialysis. (2) Results of studies evaluating the effect of CRF on metabolic drug disposition are not of general validity, unless both patients undergoing hemodialysis and patients not undergoing hemodialysis have been examined. Our in vitro observations exclude that impairment of lidocaine disposition is the result of direct inhibition of metabolizing enzymes by accumulated metabolites or uremic toxins. Alternative mechanisms, suggested by the results of recent in vitro studies, are discussed.     

The effect of renal disease on tolrestat pharmacokinetics.

Many patients with diabetes who may benefit from treatment with tolrestat, a new aldose reductase inhibitor, will have nephropathy. Therefore the effect of renal dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics of tolrestat was evaluated in eight subjects maintained on hemodialysis, 11 subjects with partial renal impairment (creatinine clearance values ranging from 14 to 80 ml/min/1.73 m2), and eight normal subjects. Each subject received a single oral dose of 200 mg tolrestat. Blood and urine samples were collected during a 48-hour period, and tolrestat concentrations were measured by HPLC. Renal dysfunction had no apparent effect on the rate of absorption or volume of distribution of tolrestat. However, tolrestat clearance was significantly reduced from 30 +/- 3 (SD) ml/hr/kg in the normal subjects to 15 +/- 5 ml/hr/kg in the subjects receiving dialysis, and tolrestat half-life was prolonged from 11 to 16 hours. Therefore a reduction in tolrestat dose is suggested for patients with severe renal impairment.     

Kinetics of intravenous amoxicillin in patients on long-term dialysis.

The kinetics of intravenous amoxicillin was studied in 8 patients with creatinine clearances of less than 7 ml/min who were on long-term hemodialysis. Kinetic parameters were determined using a 2-compartment linear model. The serum half-life (t1/2) of amoxicillin in these patients ranged from 7.5 to 21 hr. The t1/2 fell to 2.84 +/- 0.45 hr during dialysis. Approximately 30% of the dose was recovered in the dialysate during 4 hr of dialysis and there was a 25% reduction per hour in serum concentration. We present a dosage schedule for intravenous amoxicillin in patients with reduced renal function who are undergoing hemodialysis.     

Pharmacokinetics of enoxacin and its oxometabolite following intravenous administration to patients with different degrees of renal impairment.

Enoxacin is a fluorinated quinolone with potential clinical use in the treatment of serious infections. Twenty-three patients (age, 19 to 87 years) with different degrees of renal function, including a group undergoing chronic hemodialysis, received enoxacin (400 mg) by intravenous infusion (1 h). Blood samples were collected before infusion; at the end of infusion; and at 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min and 3, 4, 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 h after infusion. Enoxacin and oxoenoxacin concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- standard deviation) were calculated by using a noncompartmental PK model according to creatinine clearances (in milliliters per minute). Total clearance of enoxacin decreased from 4.95 +/- 1.16 ml/min per kg in the group with normal creatinine clearance to 0.76 +/- 0.21 ml/min per kg in the patients with severe renal failure (creatinine clearance, less than 15 ml/min), whereas the elimination half-life increased from 4.5 +/- 1.0 to 20 +/- 5 h, respectively. The elimination of oxoenoxacin (the main metabolite of enoxacin) in urine was markedly decreased when creatinine clearance was less than 15 ml/min. Hemodialysis removed an insignificant amount of enoxacin and oxoenoxacin. These data indicate that as creatinine clearance falls below 30 ml/min, the daily enoxacin dose should be reduced by half. During prolonged administration of enoxacin to patients with creatinine clearances of less than 30 ml/min, the accumulation of oxoenoxacin might lead to unexpected side effects.     

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in patients with respiratory tract infections.

The steady-state pharmacokinetics of cefepime were evaluated in 10 middle-aged and elderly patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections who were receiving 1 g intravenously every 12 h. One preinfusion and 15 postinfusion serum samples and total urine output were collected over one dosing interval between days 3 and 8 of therapy. Cefepime concentrations in serum over time exhibited a multicompartmental profile. Peak and trough concentrations in serum determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method were 71.2 +/- 17.2 (mean +/- standard deviation) and 6.0 +/- 4.9 mg/liter, respectively. The steady-state volume of distribution was 0.22 +/- 0.05 liter/kg. Elimination half-lives ranged from 1.93 to 6.04 h (3.92 +/- 1.28 h), and total body clearances ranged from 36.9 to 102 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (73.0 +/- 19.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2). The disposition of cefepime at steady state in patients was comparable to previous observations in healthy elderly volunteers. The predictive performance of regression equations derived from single-dose studies in volunteers relating creatinine clearance with total body and renal clearances of cefepime exhibited slight biases (mean predictive errors, -9.7 and 2.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively) and similar precisions. Predicted and observed total body clearances (63.3 +/- 25.1 versus 73.0 +/- 19.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively) and renal clearances (51.3 +/- 24.4 versus 49.3 +/- 19.6 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively) were not significantly different. The pharmacokinetics of cefepime in infected patients appeared to be unaltered by illness, and the steady-state disposition of cefepime was predictable from data derived from single-dose studies in volunteers.     

Cefmenoxime pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers and subjects with renal insufficiency and on hemodialysis.

The pharmacokinetics of cefmenoxime were characterized in five healthy volunteers and in 15 subjects with various degrees of renal insufficiency after a single 10-mg/kg, 5-min intravenous infusion. Five of these subjects were studied both on hemodialysis and during an interdialytic period. Plasma, urine and dialysate were assayed for cefmenoxime by a specific high-pressure liquid chromatographic assay. Peak plasma concentrations of cefmenoxime were ca. 94 micrograms/ml after completion of the infusion. The mean plasma and renal clearances in the healthy volunteers were 281 +/- 66 and 228 +/- 52 ml/min, respectively. Plasma clearance declined in patients with renal insufficiency and correlated significantly with creatine clearance. The mean apparent volume of distribution at steady state in the healthy volunteers was 0.23 liters/kg and was not found to be significantly different in subjects with renal insufficiency. The mean cumulative 24-h urinary recovery of cefmenoxime in healthy volunteers was 81% of the administered dose and decreased with reduced renal function. Cefmenoxine dosage should be reduced in proportion to the decline in creatinine clearance. A simple nomogram for dose selection is provided.     

Pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in patients with moderate renal failure and in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

The pharmacokinetics of piperacillin administered intravenously were studied in five patients with stable mild to moderate renal impairment and in five patients undergoing hemodialysis. Patients with stable renal failure given 1 g of piperacillin intravenously had peak serum concentrations within 30 min ranging from 78 to 280 micrograms/ml. The mean serum half-life was 3.57 +/- 1.36 h; the mean apparent volume of distribution was 28.6 +/- 13.5 liters/100 kg; and the plasma clearance was 4.10 +/- 1.46 liters/h per 1.73 m2. Neither serum half-life nor clearance correlated with serum creatinine, implying significant nonrenal elimination. Patients undergoing hemodialysis had peak serum concentrations within 30 min of 66 to 138 micrograms/ml after 1 g of piperacillin infused intravenously. During hemodialysis, the serum half-life was 3.6 +/- 2.5 h; the mean apparent volume of distribution was 26.7 +/- 16.7 liters/100 kg; and the plasma clearance was 3.28 +/- 0.76 layers/h per 1.73 m2. Mean hemodialysis clearance was 0.484 +/- 0.282 liters/h per 1.73 m2, and only 10.0 +/- 5.3% of the total dose could be recovered in the dialysate.     

Ofloxacin pharmacokinetics in renal failure.

The pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin were investigated in 12 normal subjects and 21 uremic patients after the administration of a single oral 200-mg dose. An open three-compartment body model was used to calculate ofloxacin pharmacokinetic parameters. In healthy subjects, the peak plasma level averaged 2.24 +/- 0.90 micrograms/ml and was obtained at 0.83 +/- 0.31 h. The absorption rate constant was 4.22 +/- 1.64 h-1. The terminal half-life was 7.86 +/- 1.81 h. The apparent volume of distribution was 2.53 +/- 0.78 liters/kg. Total body and renal clearances were 241.4 +/- 53.8 and 196.5 +/- 42.9 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. A total of 68.4 +/- 11.9% of the dose was recovered unchanged in 24-h urine. In uremic patients, the terminal half-life increased in relation to the degree of renal failure: from 8 h in normal subjects to 37 h in severely uremic patients. Renal insufficiency did not significantly modify the peak plasma level, the apparent volume of distribution, the fractional clearance, or the nonrenal clearance of ofloxacin. However, the time to peak level was delayed in patients with creatinine clearance of less than 30 ml/min. Linear relationships were found between ofloxacin pharmacokinetic parameters and glomerular filtration rate data. Ofloxacin is only very slightly removed by hemodialysis. Dosage adjustments of ofloxacin in uremic patients are proposed.     

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous amdinocillin in healthy subjects and patients with renal insufficiency.

Five healthy volunteers and 31 patients with various degrees of renal impairment received a 10-mg/kg intravenous dose of amdinocillin by infusion over 15 min to establish the disposition profile of the drug in plasma and urine. Both clearance from plasma and elimination rate constant showed a linear relationship with creatinine clearance. It was noted that in subjects with creatinine clearances of greater than 50 ml/min, the elimination half-life remained relatively constant; however, as the creatinine clearance decreased from 50 to 5 ml/min, there was a progressive rise in the elimination half-life. Despite the removal of the drug by hemodialysis (32 to 72% of the dose), concentrations of amdinocillin in plasma remained in the therapeutic range. In patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, less than 4.0% of the infused dose was removed by dialysis during the hourly exchanges over a 14- to 18-h period. Although the clearance from plasma and the half-life of amdinocillin were altered up to fourfold in patients with creatinine clearances of less than 15 ml/min, the amdinocillin dosage per se may not need to be reduced for these patients if the frequency of dosing is reduced from six to three or four times daily. This is based on drug accumulation estimates of 56% from a regimen of 10 mg/kg every 8 h in these patients as compared with less than 10% from a regimen of 10 mg/kg every 4 h in subjects with normal renal function. In addition, supplemental doses may not be necessary during or at the end of hemodialysis for patients undergoing hemodialysis.     

Pharmacokinetics of the somatostatin analog lanreotide in patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of the somatostatin analog lanreotide in patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency. METHODS: Lanreotide was administered by intravenous bolus (7 microg/kg) to 12 patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency and to 12 healthy subjects. Lanreotide serum levels were determined by a radioimmunoassay procedure from time 0 until 24 hours after the administration. The main pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by a noncompartmental treatment of data. RESULTS: The total serum clearance of lanreotide was found to be significantly lower in patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency than in healthy subjects (mean +/- SEM values of 0.138 +/- 0.017 L/hr/kg versus 0.244 +/- 0.027 L/hr/kg; P < .005). The initial lanreotide concentration, the elimination half-life, the area under the curve from time zero to 24 hours, and the area under the curve from time zero to infinity were significantly greater in patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency than in healthy subjects (307.45 +/- 79.19 ng/mL versus 127.18 +/- 22.65 ng/mL [P < .05]; 2.39 +/- 0.33 hours versus 1.32 +/- 0.20 hours [P < .005]; 62.55 +/- 9.73 ng/mL x hr versus 32.09 +/- 3.23 ng/mL x hr [P < .005]; and 62.95 +/- 9.78 ng/mL x hr versus 32.30 +/- 3.23 ng/mL x hr [P < .005], respectively). The initial volume of distribution, but not the volume of distribution at steady state, was significantly lower in patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency (0.040 +/- 0.008 L/kg versus 0.092 +/- 0.020 L/kg [P < .05] and 0.110 +/- 0.018 L/kg versus 0.172 +/- 0.046 L/kg [difference not statistically significant], respectively). The mean residence time was similar in both groups (0.77 +/- 0.06 hours versus 0.65 +/- 0.14 hours [difference not statistically significant]). CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in the total serum clearance and a decrease in the initial volume of distribution of lanreotide were observed in patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency treated with one intravenous bolus dose of 7 microg/kg lanreotide.