A comparative study of fungicidal activities of voriconazole and amphotericin B against hyphae of Aspergillus fumigatus

OBJECTIVES: To study the in vitro fungicidal activity of voriconazole against hyphae of Aspergillus fumigatus and compare the results with those obtained for the known fungicidal drug amphotericin B. METHODS: A. fumigatus mycelia were grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar and in peptone yeast extract glucose broth until the cultures reached a mid-logarithmic growth phase. The fungicidal activities of voriconazole and amphotericin B against actively growing hyphae of A. fumigatus were examined by a kill-curve experiment and a fungal cell viability test. For the kill-curve study, the drug-treated hyphae were washed, homogenized and resuspended in 1 mL of sterile water, diluted 10-1000 fold and aliquots of 0.1 mL were spread on Sabouraud dextrose agar and allowed to grow for 48 h at 35 degrees C. The cfu were determined and plotted against drug concentrations for each time of exposure to obtain the kill curve. The viability of drug-treated A. fumigatus hyphae was determined by their ability to reduce tetrazolium compound 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide. RESULTS: Exposure of A. fumigatus hyphae to several concentrations (1-16 mg/L) of voriconazole or amphotericin B for various time intervals killed the hyphae in a time- and drug concentration-dependent manner. Voriconazole at 1 mg/L killed >95% of the hyphae grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar after 48 h of exposure, whereas amphotericin B at the same concentration killed approximately 70% of the hyphae after exposure for the same duration. Approximately 99% killing of hyphae grown in peptone yeast extract glucose broth was obtained for voriconazole at 1 mg/L after 48 h of exposure, whereas amphotericin B at 1 mg/L yielded approximately 82% killing after 48 h. The fungal cell viability test by tetrazolium reduction assay showed that mycelia exposed to > or =1 mg/L (Sabouraud dextrose agar blocks) and > or =2 mg/L (broth cultures) of voriconazole for 48 h completely failed to reduce 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide. At low concentrations (1-2 mg/L) amphotericin B had no detectable effect on 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide reduction by drug-treated mycelia, whereas mycelia treated with 16 mg/L for 48 h showed approximately 50% inhibition of 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide reduction compared with the control. CONCLUSIONS: Voriconazole possesses excellent fungicidal activity against actively growing hyphae of A. fumigatus. A comparison of results with those obtained for the known fungicidal drug amphotericin B shows that, in peptone yeast extract glucose broth, voriconazole has superior fungicidal activity against A. fumigatus hyphae compared with that of amphotericin B.     

In vitro activities of amphotericin B and voriconazole against aleurioconidia from Aspergillus terreus

This study used aleurioconidia as inoculum and compared the MICs of amphotericin B and voriconazole to those obtained for conidia of 31 Aspergillus terreus strains. For conidia and aleurioconidia, the MIC at which 90% of strains were inhibited was 2.5 microg/ml and 5 microg/ml with amphotericin B and 1 microg/ml and 2 microg/ml with voriconazole.     

Antifungal interactions within the triple combination of amphotericin B, caspofungin and voriconazole against Aspergillus species

OBJECTIVES: The in vitro effects of caspofungin combined with voriconazole and amphotericin B were tested in triplicate experiments against nine clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus terreus. METHODS: The isolates were tested against a range of concentrations of voriconazole (0.015-1.0 mg/L), caspofungin (0.125-256 mg/L) and five concentrations of amphotericin B (0.1-0.5 mg/L) with a microdilution chequerboard method based on the CLSI M38-A reference method and the results were analysed with the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index. The effect of individual drugs on the FIC index of each of the double combinations was also evaluated. RESULTS: The triple combination of voriconazole, caspofungin and amphotericin B against all Aspergillus spp. was synergistic (FIC index 0.49-0.57) at low median concentrations of amphotericin B (0.10-0.22 mg/L) and voriconazole (0.07-0.15 mg/L) over a wide range of caspofungin concentrations (4.32-17.28 mg/L). Antagonistic interactions (FIC index 1.65-2.15) were found at higher median concentrations of amphotericin B (0.3-0.5 mg/L) and voriconazole (0.23-0.68 mg/L) over a similarly wide range of caspofungin concentrations (1.47-32 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: These concentration-dependent interactions may have important clinical implications, which require further evaluation in animal models of invasive aspergillosis.     

Comparison of the fungicidal activities of caspofungin and amphotericin B against Candida glabrata

We investigated the fungicidal activity of caspofungin (CAS) and amphotericin B (AMB) against 16 clinical isolates of Candida glabrata. The minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of CAS were similar to those of AMB, ranging from 2.0 to >8.0 microg/ml. Time-kill assays performed on selected isolates showed that AMB was fungicidal at concentrations four times the MIC while CAS was not. A neutropenic-mouse model of disseminated infection was utilized to determine the residual fungal kidney burden. While doses as low as 0.3 and 1 mg/kg of body weight/day of CAS and AMB, respectively, were effective at reducing the counts with respect to controls, organ sterilization was reached when both drugs were administered at 5 mg/kg/day. Our study reveals that, similar to AMB, CAS has the potential for a fungicidal effect in vivo against this difficult-to-treat fungal pathogen.     

In vitro susceptibilities of Aspergillus species to voriconazole,itraconazole, and amphotericin B

We studied the in vitro activity of voriconazole (VCZ) itraconazole (ITZ) and amphotericin B (AMB) against 216 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. (142 Aspergillus fumigatus and 74 nonfumigatus Aspergillus spp. isolates) using a broth macrodilution method. The MICs (μg/mL) (mean, range) for A. fumigatus were: VCZ 0.88, 0.25–4; ITZ 0.54, 0.25–4; AMB 2.16, 0.5–8. MIC₉₀s were: VCZ 2, ITZ 1, AMB 4. MICs for nonfumigatus Aspergillus spp. were: VCZ 1.57, 0.25–4; ITZ 1.74, 0.25–4; AMB 2.88, 0.5–8. MIC₉₀s for this group were: VCZ 4, ITZ 4, AMB 4. We also studied the susceptibility to VCZ of 18 AMB-resistant (mean, MIC 6.0 μg/mL) and 28 ITZ-resistant (mean, MIC 13.28 μg/mL) A. fumigatus isolates selected in the laboratory. The mean MICs of VCZ were 0.59 μg/mL for AMB-resistant and 1.32 μg/mL for ITZ-resistant isolates. Our study showed that VCZ and ITZ had comparable in vitro activity against the isolates studied, except against A. fumigatus, where the MIC of ITZ was lower. The azoles had better in vitro activity than AMB against A. fumigatus and non-fumigatus spp. The non-fumigatus Aspergillus spp. were less susceptible to all three antifungals evaluated. When tested against ITZ- or AMB-resistant A. fumigatus strains, VCZ retained good activity, showing only a modest rise in the MIC against ITZ-resistant strains.     

In vitro activities of terbinafine against Aspergillus species in comparison with those of itraconazole and amphotericin B

Compared with the in vitro activities of itraconazole (geometric mean MIC [GM], 0.56 microg/ml) and amphotericin B (GM, 0.66 microg/ml), the in vitro activity of terbinafine was inferior against Aspergillus fumigatus (GM, 19.03 microg/ml) (P < 0.05) and superior against A. flavus (GM, 0.10 microg/ml), A. terreus (GM, 0.16 microg/ml), and A. niger (GM, 0.19 microg/ml). Clinical correlation is required, as trailing endpoints are problematic.     

Minimum fungicidal concentrations of amphotericin B for bloodstream Candida species

Minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of amphotericin B were obtained for 165 bloodstream isolates (104 Candida parapsilosis, 14 C.glabrata, 13 C.tropicalis, 15 C.krusei, and 19 C.albicans) and 36 C.dubliniensis from oropharyngeal infections. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by the M27-A microdilution method. MFCs (> or =99.9% killing) were obtained following MIC determination (inoculum size, 10(4) CFU/ml) by seeding the entire volume of all clear wells. The best fungicidal activity was for C. albicans, (MFC90 1 microg/ml) and the lowest for C.parapsilosis, C.tropicalis and C.glabrata (MFC90 16 microg/ml). Although MFCs were > or =16x MIC for some isolates, including C. glabrata, the overall MFCs were > or =2x MICs. However, major differences between MICs and MFCs were observed for C.parapsilosis and C.dubliniensis (3.8% and 8.9%, respectively, were tolerant: MFC > or =32MIC). MFCs for C.tropicalis and C. glabrata were > or =2 microg/ml. By this more stringent method we found substantial differences from those previously reported between amphotericin B MIC and MFCs for Candida spp.     

In vitro pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole against Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Scedosporium spp

We compared the in vitro pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole against Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Scedosporium species with a combination of two non-culture-based techniques: the tetrazolium salt 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-[(sulfenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium-hydroxide) (XTT) colorimetric reduction assay, and fluorescent microscopy with the cellular morbidity dye bis-(1,3-dibutylbarbituric acid) trimethine oxonol (DiBAC) to directly visualize hyphal damage. Amphotericin B exhibited species-specific concentration-dependent activity, with 50% effective concentrations (EC(50)s) ranging from 0.10 to 0.12 mg/ml for A. fumigatus, 0.36 to 0.53 mg/ml for A. terreus, 0.27 to > or = 32 mg/ml for F. solani, 0.41 to 0.55 mg/ml for F. oxysporum, and 0.97 and 0.65 mg/ml for S. apiospermum and S. prolificans, respectively. Similarly, itraconazole inhibited the growth of A. fumigatus and A. terreus isolates with MICs of <1 mg/ml (EC(50) 0.03 to 0.85 mg/ml) and S. apiospermum, but was not active against Fusarium species or S. prolificans. Voriconazole effectively inhibited the growth of Aspergillus, Fusarium, and S. apiospermum (EC(50) 0.10 to 3.3 mg/ml) but had minimal activity against a multidrug-resistant isolate of F. solani or S. prolificans. Hyphal damage visualized by DiBAC staining was observed more frequently with voriconazole and amphotericin B versus itraconazole. These data highlight the species-specific differences in antifungal pharmacodynamics between mold-active agents that could be relevant for the development of in vitro susceptibility breakpoints and antifungal dosing in vivo.     

In-vitro activity of voriconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B against filamentous fungi

The in-vitro fungistatic and fungicidal activities of voriconazole were compared with those of itraconazole and amphotericin B. MICs for 110 isolates belonging to 11 species of filamentous fungi were determined by a broth microdilution adaptation of the method recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Minimum lethal concentrations (MLCs) of the three antifungal agents were also determined. The MIC ranges of the three compounds were comparable for Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Cladophialophora bantiana and Exophiala dermatitidis. Voriconazole and itraconazole were more active than amphotericin B against Fonsecaea pedrosoi, but the two azole agents were less active against Sporothrix schenckii. Voriconazole was more active than itraconazole or amphotericin B against Scedosporium apiospermum, but less active than the other two agents against two mucoraceous moulds, Absidia corymbifera and Rhizopus arrhizus. Voriconazole and amphotericin B were more active than itraconazole against Fusarium solani. With the exception of S. apiospermum, all the moulds tested had MLC50 values of < or =2 mg/L and MLC90 values of < or =4 mg/L against amphotericin B. Voriconazole and itraconazole showed fungicidal effects against five of the 1 1 moulds tested (A. flavus, A. fumigatus, C. bantiana, E. dermatitidis and F. pedrosoi) with MLC90 values of < or =2 mg/L. In addition, voriconazole was fungicidal for Phialophora parasitica. Our results suggest that voriconazole could be effective against a wide range of mould infections in humans.     

E test法检测3种抗真菌药物对128株酵母菌的体外活性

目的调查我院酵母菌对氟康唑等3种抗菌药的敏感性，指导临床用药。方法使用Etest法测定3种抗真菌药对128株酵母菌的MIC。结果两性霉素B对128株酵母菌的抗菌活性最强(敏感率94．5％，MIC50和MIC90分别为0．25和1mg／L)，其次为氟康唑和伊曲康唑(前者敏感率92．2％，MIC50和MIC90为2和8mg／L；后者为64．1％．MIC50和MIC90为0．064和0．75mg／L)；71株白念珠菌对两性霉素B、氟康唑和伊曲康唑的敏感率分别为100％、98．5％和91．6％；30株热带念珠菌对氟康唑、两性霉素B和伊曲康唑的敏感率分别为96．7％、86．7％和19．9％；12株光滑念珠菌对两性霉素B、氟康唑和伊曲康唑的敏感率分别为100％、74．9％和33．3％。结论我院自念珠菌对3种抗真菌药高度敏感，非白念念珠菌对3种抗真菌药表现不同程度耐药，应加强对非白念念珠菌耐药性的监控。     

Synergistic activities of fluconazole and voriconazole with terbinafine against four Candida species determined by checkerboard, time-kill, and Etest methods

The in vitro activities of fluconazole or voriconazole plus terbinafine were evaluated against 20 Candida isolates by the checkerboard, time-kill, and Etest methods. Synergism (C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. tropicalis) and indifference (C. krusei) were observed. Correlation among methods was good. The Etest is a suitable method to determine drug interactions.     

In vitro synergy testing of anidulafungin with itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against Aspergillus spp. and Fusarium spp

The in vitro interactions of anidulafungin with itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B were evaluated by using the checkerboard method. For Aspergillus spp., anidulafungin with amphotericin B showed indifference for 16/26 isolates, while anidulafungin with either azole showed a synergy trend for 18/26 isolates. All drug combinations showed indifference for 7/7 Fusarium sp. isolates.     

In vitro synergisms obtained by amphotericin B and voriconazole associated with non-antifungal agents against Fusarium spp

Fusarium spp is an opportunistic fungal pathogen responsible for causing invasive hyalohyphomycosis in immunocompromised patients. Due to its susceptibility pattern with a remarkable resistance to antifungal agents the treatment failures and mortality rates are high. To overcome this situation, combination therapy may be considered which must be subjected to in vitro tests.In vitro activities of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole associated with azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, fluvastatin, ibuprofen, metronidazole, and also the combination of amphotericin B plus rifampin against 23 strains of Fusarium spp. through the checkerboard technique based on M38-A2 [Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard, 2nd ed. (CLSI document M38-A2) (ISBN 1-56238-668-9). Wayne, PA: CLSI] were evaluated.The best synergistic interactions with amphotericin B were with ibuprofen (43.5%) (FICI [fractional inhibitory concentration index] range = 0.25–2). Combinations with voriconazole showed synergism, mainly with ciprofloxacin (30.4%) (FICI range = 0.25–3) and metronidazole (30.4%) (FICI range = 0.1–4); however, all the combinations with itraconazole were indifferent. In general, antagonistic interactions were not registered.Our results showed that in vitro synergisms obtained by some combinations studied deserve attention since they were better than those showed by the antimycotic.     

A comparison of the fungicidal activity of amphotericin B and posaconazole against Zygomycetes in vitro

Zygomycoses is a rapidly progressive infection associated with high mortality. Although amphotericin B (AMB) has been the only treatment option for years, recent studies have demonstrated that posaconazole (PCZ) has good activity against Zygomycetes. Because rapid onset of antifungal activity is crucial in the management and never studied before, we compared the time for maximum fungicidal activity of AMB versus PCZ using time–kill curves. The MIC of AMB and PCZ against clinical isolates of Mucor spp. and Rhizopus spp. was determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M38-A2 method, and the fungicidal activity was examined by time–kill studies. AMB was rapidly fungicidal, with 95% killing noted as early as 6 h and 99.9% killing at 24 h; PCZ showed <70% killing at 6 h and 99.9% killing at 48 h. In vivo animal studies using AMB in the early phase, followed by a switch to high-dose PCZ later, could provide data that may have clinical implications because there are only a few drugs currently available for the management of zygomycoses.     

In vitro activities of amphotericin B in combination with four antifungal agents and rifampin against Aspergillus spp.

Strains of Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, and Aspergillus niger were tested for in vitro susceptibility with a microtiter plate system in buffered yeast-nitrogen base and in buffered minimal essential medium. Isolates were tested against amphotericin B, flucytosine, rifampin, ketoconazole, ICI 153,066, and Bay n 7133 and against combinations of amphotericin B with each of the other five drugs. Combinations of amphotericin B and rifampin were the most active against all three species of Aspergillus. Flucytosine combined with amphotericin B produced little or no reduction of the MICs at which 90% of the strains were inhibited compared with amphotericin B alone. With one exception, the addition of ketoconazole, ICI 153,066, or Bay n 7133 to amphotericin B did not consistently alter the MICs. The addition of ICI 153,066 markedly increased the MICs of amphotericin B against the A. flavus isolates in both media. When the azoles were tested alone, Bay n 7133 was the most active against A. fumigatus, but was two- to fivefold less active against A. flavus. Ketoconazole was the most active azole against A. flavus.     

In vitro activities of voriconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B against Blastomyces dermatitidis, Coccidioides immitis, and Histoplasma capsulatum

The in vitro activity of voriconazole was compared to those of itraconazole and amphotericin B against the mold forms of 304 isolates of three dimorphic fungi, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Coccidioides immitis, and Histoplasma capsulatum. MICs were determined by a broth microdilution adaptation of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-A procedure. RPMI 1640 medium was used for tests with voriconazole and itraconazole, whereas Antibiotic Medium 3 with 2% glucose was used for amphotericin B. Minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) were also determined. Amphotericin B was active against all three dimorphic fungi, with MICs at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited (MIC(90)s) of 0.5 to 1 microg/ml. Itraconazole had MIC(90)s of 0.06 microg/ml for H. capsulatum, 0.125 microg/ml for B. dermatitidis, and 1 microg/ml for C. immitis. The MIC(90)s of voriconazole were 0.25 microg/ml for all three fungi. Amphotericin B was fungicidal for B. dermatitidis and H. capsulatum with MFCs at which 90% of strains tested are killed (MFC(90)s) of 0.5 and 2 microg/ml, respectively. It was less active against C. immitis, with MFCs ranging from 0.5 to >16 microg/ml. Voriconazole and itraconazole were lethal for most isolates of B. dermatitidis, with MFC(50)s and MFC(90)s of 0.125 and 4 microg/ml, respectively. Both azoles were fungicidal for some isolates of H. capsulatum, with MFC(50)s of 2 and 8 microg/ml for itraconazole and voriconazole, respectively; neither had a lethal effect upon C. immitis. Our results suggest that voriconazole possesses promising activity against these important human pathogens.