Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The bone-patellar tendon-bone has been widely used and considered a good graft source. The quadriceps tendon was introduced as a substitute graft source for bone-patellar tendon-bone. We compared the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using central quadriceps tendon-patellar bone and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts. We selected 72 patients who underwent unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone between 1994 and 2001 and matched for age and gender with 72 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon-patellar bone. All patients were followed up for more than 2 years. We assessed anterior laxity, knee function using the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and quadriceps strength, the means of which were similar in the two groups. More patients (28 or 39%) in the bone-patellar tendon-bone group reported anterior knee pain than in the quadriceps tendon-patellar bone group (six patients or 8.3%). Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the central quadriceps tendon-patellar bone graft showed clinical outcomes comparable to those of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the patellar tendon graft, with anterior knee pain being less frequent in the former. Our data suggest the quadriceps tendon can be a good alternative graft choice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Therapeutic study.     

Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts

The authors review the current knowledge on donor site–related problems after using different types of autografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and make recommendations on minimizing late donor-site problems. Postoperative donor-site morbidity and anterior knee pain following ACL surgery may result in substantial impairment for patients. The selection of graft, surgical technique, and rehabilitation program can affect the severity of pain that patients experience. The loss or disturbance of anterior sensitivity caused by intraoperative injury to the infrapatellar nerve(s) in conjunction with patellar tendon harvest is correlated with donor-site discomfort and an inability to kneel and knee-walk. The patellar tendon at the donor site has significant clinical, radiographic, and histologic abnormalities 2 years after harvest of its central third. Donor-site discomfort correlates poorly with radiographic and histologic findings after the use of patellar tendon autografts. The use of hamstring tendon autografts appears to cause less postoperative donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems than the use of patellar tendon autografts. There also appears to be a regrowth of the hamstring tendons within 2 years of the harvesting procedure. There is little known about the effect on the donor site of harvesting fascia lata and quadriceps tendon autografts. Efforts should be made to spare the infrapatellar nerve(s) during ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autografts. Reharvesting the patellar tendon cannot be recommended due to significant clinical, radiographic, and histologic abnormalities 2 years after harvesting its central third. It is important to regain full range of motion and strength after the use of any type of autograft to avoid future anterior knee problems. If randomized controlled trials show that the long-term laxity measurements following ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts are equal to those of patellar tendon autografts, we recommend the use of hamstring tendon autografts because there are fewer donor-site problems.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 17, No 9 (November-December), 2001: pp 971–980     

Autografts commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is among the most common orthopaedic procedures in the United States, with >200,000 performed annually. Much has been published regarding the use of autograft versus allograft. Bone-patellar tendon-bone is the most frequently used autograft, but hamstring and quadriceps tendon grafts are common alternatives. Each graft has distinct advantages and disadvantages, and selection is individualized. Fixation methods vary by graft type. Fixation resulting in a construct that is too rigid may restrict knee range of motion. Donor site morbidity must be considered, as well. Autograft harvest may result in anterior knee pain, kneeling pain, anterior knee numbness, muscle weakness, and patellar fracture. Appropriate graft selection is essential to optimize outcomes.     

Editorial Commentary: Goldilocks and the Three Grafts: Managing Tendon Harvest and Graft Length Problems in Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Autograft hamstring tendon harvest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can occasionally result in a graft length that is inadequate for creation of a robust ACL graft. Patients at risk for an abnormally short hamstring may also be high risk for ACL reinjury. Graft augmentation with allograft may be a suboptimal solution to this problem. Therefore, a reliable means for preoperative estimation of hamstring tendon length by magnetic resonance imaging measurement could avoid this pitfall. However, even with a reliable correlation between magnetic resonance imaging measurement and actual harvested tendon length, establishing a simple, clinically relevant threshold below which hamstring grafts should be avoided remains elusive. By contrast, all-soft-tissue quadriceps autograft avoids the potential length problems inherent to both bone tendon bone (graft–tunnel mismatch) and hamstring tendon grafts, but intermediate- and long-term outcome studies are still needed to validate all-soft-tissue quadriceps autograft in ACL reconstruction.     

Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft

Surgical reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is indicated in the PCL-deficient knee with symptomatic instability and multiple ligamentous injury. However, the choice of graft tissues continues to be controversial. We describe an arthroscopic PCL reconstruction technique using the quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. From March through September 1996, this autograft was used in 12 patients with PCL injuries. After 1-1.5 years' follow-up, the clinical outcome has been encouraging. In addition, the quadriceps tendon-patellar autograft has the advantage of being self-available. Furthermore, the technique is easy to perform and has comparable anatomic and biomechanical qualities to other available techniques. Quadriceps tendon-patellar autograft is a reasonable alternative choice for PCL reconstruction.     

Patellar tendon versus quadrupled bone-semitendinosus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective clinical investigation in athletes

Purpose:Patellar tendon and hamstrings are both used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and comparisons have been reported with different results. The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the results of ACL reconstruction in athletes with 2 different graft types, both using bone-to-bone healing: bone-patellar tendon-bone graft and a quadrupled bone-semitendinosus graft.Type of Study:Outcomes study.Methods:From 1994 to 1997, 2 groups of 40 athletes who underwent ACL replacement with patellar tendon and quadrupled bone-semitendinosus grafts were prospectively evaluated. Preinjury activity level, age, and gender were comparable in both groups. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon within 5 months from injury and underwent group-specific rehabilitation programs. An independent examiner performed the final evaluations at 36 months. Review included clinical examination, radiographs, computed analysis, isokinetic and functional strength tests, and subjective and objective evaluation with standard knee scores. Additional procedures were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with both parametric and nonparametric tests.Results:Average surgical time was longer with the semitendinosus graft, and postoperative pain was higher in the patellar tendon group. Standard knee evaluation scores and subjective assessment revealed no significant differences. Isokinetic testing of flexion-extension and internal-external rotation showed lower quadriceps strength and a mild deficit of external rotation in the patellar tendon group and slightly lower flexor strength in the semitendinosus group at 12 months. Computerized laxity analysis showed no difference between the 2 groups with 90% of patients having less than 3 mm side-to-side difference, with a gender difference in the semitendinosus group. Kneeling pain was higher in patellar tendon group.Conclusions:The bone-patellar tendon-bone and quadrupled bone-semitendinosus autograft provide excellent grafts for ACL reconstruction. Both techniques are comparable regarding final stability, but in patients with extensor mechanism problems or those who engage in sports with a high incidence of patellar tendonitis, the semitendinosus graft should be considered.     

Short-term recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective comparison of three autografts

Sixty-four patients with three different autografts were prospectively evaluated following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for motion return, thigh girth, quadriceps activity, assistive device usage, and duration of pain medication usage. The quadriceps tendon group achieved knee extension sooner than the patellar tendon group. The hamstring group used assistive devices for less time than the patellar tendon group. The quadriceps group required less pain medication than either of the groups. There are significant differences in short-term pain medication requirements and restoration of function among patients following ACL reconstruction using different autografts.     

Editorial Commentary: Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Using Soft Tissue Autograft Quadriceps Is Effective but Not Recommended for All Comers

The average revision rate is between 3.2% and 11.1%following primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions,¹ and an objective failure rate of 13.7% has been reported for revision ACLR.² Prior implants, positioning of tunnels, and muscle weakness from the prior reconstruction present challenges. Additionally, graft choice for the revision reconstruction is restricted, depending on the primary reconstruction. Revision ACL reconstruction with the all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft is a viable option with 83.3% of the patients surpassing the minimally clinically significant difference for International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, which is similar to outcomes for revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-patella-bone and hamstring tendon autografts. Furthermore, objective strength data suggest that it is possible to achieve equal limb symmetry index strength ratios even in the setting of prior bone-patella tendon-bone autograft. However, although I am cautiously optimistic regarding soft tissue quadriceps autograft in revision ACLR, I would be hesitant to recommend it for all comers. In my experience, young high school/collegiate female athletes with primary reconstruction using BPTB autograft may not be able to tolerate a secondary insult to the extensor mechanism via quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft harvest, where hematoma and arthrofibrosis could be concerns. Furthermore, increased posterior tibial slope may require evaluation and treatment, and the addition of a lateral extra-articular tenodesis may reduce residual rotatory laxity in ACL revision patients.     

Editorial Commentary: With Appropriate Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Selection,All-Inside Reconstruction Results in Excellent Outcomes: Stay “Inside” and Be Cognizant of Hamstring Graft Diameter Expectations in Shorter Patients

All-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a minimally invasive and anatomic technique with predictably excellent results. The array of graft choices that exists for skilled arthroscopists include semitendinosis autograft with or without gracilis, quadriceps tendon autograft, and patellar tendon autograft and allograft. The advantages of all-inside ACL reconstruction include independent femoral socket creation and less pain compared with a full tibial tunnel in the early postoperative period. This is a technique that should not trump appropriate graft selection. It is expected that autografts will fare better in younger patients who participate in activities at greater risk for ACL injuries. Selection of a semitendinosis autograft results in predictably excellent results when graft diameters are 8 mm or greater. Quadrupling the semitendinosis and adding the gracilis when needed can provide sufficient graft diameter in many patients. However, caution should be taken when harvesting hamstring grafts from shorter patients. Semitendinosis tendons in such patients are sometimes not long enough to quadruple and can result in a diameters less than 8 mm even when the gracilis is added. With appropriate graft selection, staying “inside” for ACL reconstruction is expected to result in great objective and subjective outcomes for our patients.     

Double-stranded hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft is the most commonly used tissue for ACL reconstruction; however, the harvesting of patellar tendon as a free graft can lead to significant morbidity. Alternate grafts may lower morbidity, yet the most commonly used alternate grafts including the double-stranded semi-tendinosus or gracilis have not been studied biomechanically. This study investigated the morphometric and biomechanical properties of double-stranded semi-tendinosus and gracilis tendons separately along with the patellar and quadriceps tendons obtained bilaterally from six fresh, 77-year-old cadaveric specimens. The quadriceps tendon was the thickest and therefore had the largest cross-sectional area, whereas double-stranded semitendinosus had the highest mean peak load to failure (1029+/-158.4 N), 11.5% and 10.3% stronger than patellar tendon and quadriceps tendons, respectively. Midsubstance rupture occurred in the hamstring tendons, whereas the patellar and quadriceps tendons failed at the bone-tendon junctions. Semitendinosus tendons with higher cross-sectional area had higher peak loads to failure. This linear relationship between cross-sectional area and the peak load to rupture also was observed in the other tendon groups (except gracilis). These results indicate that despite a lower cross-sectional area of the double-stranded semitendinosus, this tendon demonstrated a comparable mean peak load to rupture and stress compared with patellar and quadriceps tendons. It also was demonstrated that combined double-stranded semitendinosus and gracilis tendons produce a stronger graft with initial strength twice that of the patellar tendon, but requires further testing.     

Hamstring tendon autograft better than bone patellar-tendon bone autograft in ACL reconstruction: a cumulative meta-analysis and clinically relevant sensitivity analysis applied to a previously published analysis

Background Current debate on treatment options for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction complicate the choice between hamstring and bone patellartendon bone autografts. We hypothesized a priori that cumulative meta-analysis (a form of sensitivity analysis) might show that the evidence for reduction of morbidity by hamstring grafts could have been reached at an earlier time. Furthermore, we hypothesized a priori that modern state-of-the-art hamstring graft fixation technique would give similar results regarding stability as bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts.

Methods We performed a cumulative meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis based on femoral graft fixation techniques to compare hamstring autograft and bonepatellar tendon-bone autografts in ACL reconstruction derived from a previously published meta-analysis.

Results Cumulatively, that hamstring autograft reduces anterior knee pain had already reached statistical significance in 2001 (relative risk 0.49 (95%CI: 0.32-0.76; p = 0.001, I2 = 0%)). The modern endobutton hamstring graft fixation technique (2 studies) yielded similar stability in the Lachman test as bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts, with a relative risk of 1.1 (95%CI: 0.82-1.5; p = 0.6, I2 = 0%). Exclusion of the endobutton group explains the increased laxity in the hamstring graft group.

Interpretation Cumulative meta-analysis strengthens the evidence for reduced morbidity using hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sensitivity analysis focusing on state-of-the-art hamstring graft fixation techniques further weakens the evidence that bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts provide better stability.     

Arthroscopy-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring autografts

Isolated ACL reconstructions were performed in 138 patients between 1994 and 1998. Patellar bone-patellar tendon-bone, and hamstring tendon autografts were used in 88 patients, and allografts were used in 50 patients. Eighty-eight knees of 88 patients with autograft reconstructions (17 female, 71 male) were included in this study and evaluation of the patients with allograft reconstruction reported separately. The mean age at the time of the operation was 32 years. All ACL reconstructions were performed arthroscopically. Twenty-seven bone-patellar tendon-bone, and 61 hamstring tendon autografts were used. The mean follow-up was 29 months. In the postoperative course the Lachman test was negative in 62 patients, 1+ in 22 patients, and 2+ in 4 patients. In 17 patients, anterior drawer sign were 1+ in comparison to the contralateral side. Pivot shift test was moderately positive only in 5 cases in the bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autograft groups postoperatively. There were 3 patients with subjective "giving way" symptoms. Second look arthroscopy revealed rupture of the neo-ligament. Arthroscopic washout and debridement were performed, and no revision ligamentoplasties were performed. Two of these patients improved with accelerated proprioceptive physical therapy, and one had to decrease his previous level of activity. There were no cases of arthrofibrosis, infection, or extension lag. Clinical results of patellar bone-tendon-bone and hamstring groups did not show any significant clinical difference. Avoiding the disturbance of the extensor mechanism of the knee is probably the most significant advantage of the hamstring autograft.     

Quadriceps Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: THE GRAFT OF THE FUTURE!

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common orthopaedic surgeries performed on active people in the world. One of the most important surgical decisions is graft type for use in the reconstruction. Despite extensive research on optimal graft choice for ACL reconstruction, discrepancy exists among practicing surgeons' graft preference. Recently, the quadriceps tendon has gained popularity for use as a graft source for ACL reconstruction.The all soft tissue quadriceps graft offers many advantages over other autograft choices. Histologically it has 20% more collagen fibrils per cross-sectional area than the patellar tendon (PT). Biomechanically, its ultimate load is 70% > than that of a similar width PT graft, while its modulus is more similar to the native ACL than either the PT or hamstring graft. Anatomically the quadriceps tendon has significantly more volume than the PT. Thus, even after harvest of the quadriceps graft, the remaining quadriceps tendon is still 80% stronger than the intact PT!The length and cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon graft can be tailored to the needs of the patient. On any patient over 5 feet tall, a graft length of 7 cm can be obtained. Because the thickness of the tendon is almost twice the thickness of the same patient's PT, a graft diameter from 7 to 11 mm can easily be achieved. Thus, this graft can be customized for both primary and revision surgeries.Harvest site morbidity is minimal. An incision less than 2 cm in an area with no significant cutaneous nerves without harvest of any patella bone leads to no significant harvest site pain, numbness, or palpable defect.Clinical outcomes using this graft are excellent. Our prospective data on nearly 1,000 grafts, with a mean patient age of 20 years old, show a 4.2% failure rate. Thus, the all soft tissue quadriceps graft will be the surgical choice for ACL reconstruction for future athletes.     

Hamstring tendon autograft better than bone patellartendon bone autograft in ACL reconstruction A cumulative meta-analysis and clinically relevant sensitivity analysis applied to a previously published analysis

Background?Current debate on treatment options for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction complicate the choice between hamstring and bone patellartendon bone autografts. We hypothesized a priori that cumulative meta-analysis (a form of sensitivity analysis) might show that the evidence for reduction of morbidity by hamstring grafts could have been reached at an earlier time. Furthermore, we hypothesized a priori that modern state-of-the-art hamstring graft fixation technique would give similar results regarding stability as bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts.

Methods?We performed a cumulative meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis based on femoral graft fixation techniques to compare hamstring autograft and bonepatellar tendon-bone autografts in ACL reconstruction derived from a previously published meta-analysis.

Results?Cumulatively, that hamstring autograft reduces anterior knee pain had already reached statistical significance in 2001 (relative risk 0.49 (95%CI: 0.32–0.76; p = 0.001, I2 = 0%)). The modern endobutton hamstring graft fixation technique (2 studies) yielded similar stability in the Lachman test as bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts, with a relative risk of 1.1 (95%CI: 0.82–1.5; p = 0.6, I2 = 0%). Exclusion of the endobutton group explains the increased laxity in the hamstring graft group.

Interpretation?Cumulative meta-analysis strengthens the evidence for reduced morbidity using hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sensitivity analysis focusing on state-of-the-art hamstring graft fixation techniques further weakens the evidence that bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts provide better stability.     

Rekonstruktion des vorderen Kreuzbandes

The treatment of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) plays an essential role for both clinicians and resident physicians. To date many questions regarding the outcome as well as ACL reconstruction techniques have not yet been conclusively clarified. Whether reconstruction of the ACL protects the knee from osteoarthritis is still unproven; however, it is well known that an unstable knee joint is more vulnerable to secondary injuries, such as meniscal tears. Thus, early ACL reconstruction is recommended to minimize the risk of these secondary injuries. Three alternative sources of material for autologous ACL reconstruction are commonly utilized. An accessory hamstring (i.e. semitendinosus tendon with or without the gracilis tendon), a central strip of the patellar tendon with bone blocks and a central strip of the quadriceps tendon with or without bone block are the most common donor tissues used in autografts. Besides selection of the type of graft, the tendon diameter also plays a crucial role. Some progress has recently been made with respect to tunnel placement. The aim is to find an anatomical tunnel position. Reconstruction of both the anteromedial and the posterolateral ACL bundles helps to rebuild the anatomy of the original ACL; however, scientifically this approach did not lead to any improvement in the results. For fixation techniques a differentiation is made between aperture, extracortical and implant-free fixation. Generally, re-ruptures are less common than revisions as a result of graft ruptures due to technical mistakes during surgery. The most common mistakes concern tunnel placement and graft fixation. Also overlooked instability can have a negative influence on the outcome of ACL reconstruction.     

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females

Purpose: To compare the clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in female patients using quadruple-looped hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft at minimum 2-year follow-up. Type of Study: Case series. Methods: A prospective clinical review was performed to compare the results of ACL reconstruction with hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft in a group of female patients. Exclusion criteria included chronic injuries (greater than 3 months), associated collateral ligament injuries, Workers’ Compensation or litigation cases, and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries. There were 39 female patients in the hamstring group (average follow-up, 40.9 months) and 37 female patients in the patellar tendon group (average follow-up, 52 months). Both types of grafts were fixed with an EndoButton proximally and with sutures tied over a post or button distally. The postoperative rehabilitation regimen was identical for both groups. Objective parameters evaluated included preinjury and postoperative Tegner and Lysholm scores, side-to-side KT-1000 maximum-manual arthrometer differences, and clinical examination including Lachman and pivot-shift tests. Graft failure was defined by any one of the following: a KT-1000 difference of greater than 5 mm, a 2+ Lachman, a 1+ or greater pivot shift, or revision surgery. Results: The failure rate in the hamstring group was 23% versus 8% in the patellar tendon group, which was not statistically significant (P > .1). Comparison of preinjury Tegner activity scores to postoperative scores revealed that patients in the hamstring group did not return to their preinjury level of activity (preinjury 6.54 v postoperative 5.17) as well as patients in the patellar tendon group (preinjury 6.20 v postoperative 6.59). Patients in the hamstring group had a significant increase in pain compared with the patellar tendon group (P = .034). Conclusions: Although not statistically significant, the hamstring group had more failures, more laxity on clinical examination, and more patients with larger KT-1000 arthrometer differences. These results indicate a trend toward increased graft laxity in female patients undergoing reconstruction with hamstring autograft compared with patellar tendon when evaluated by a single surgeon using similar fixation techniques at short- to medium-range follow-up. More studies with larger patient numbers using current fixation techniques are necessary to confirm these findings.     

Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years

ObjectiveThe aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction using either a free quadriceps tendon autograft or a quadrupled hamstring autograft with a minimum follow-up of 24 months.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing ACL reconstruction using either a free quadriceps tendon autograft or hamstring tendon autograft from January 2013 to December 2014 were included. ACL reconstruction was done in all patients due to isolated ACL tears. Patients with associated cartilage lesions > Outerbridge III, meniscal lesions in need of meniscectomy or repair as well as patients with prior knee surgery on the affected or contralateral knee were excluded. The primary outcome evaluation was the side-to-side difference in instrumented Lachman testing. Secondary outcome evaluation consisted in the Lysholm, modified Cincinnati and SF-36 scores. Side-to-side difference in range of motion and thigh diameter was also documented.ResultsAfter applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 82 patients were identified and 72 (87.8%) presented to the hospital for follow-up. There were 39 patients with quadriceps graft (30.64 ± 8.71, range: 18–53 years) and 33 patients with hamstrings (28.60 ± 6.74, range: 18–46 years). No statistically significant difference between groups was detected with regard to KT-1000 measurements (p = 0.326). No significant difference was found between the mean postoperative Lysholm (p = 0.299), the modified Cincinnati (p = 0.665) and the general SF-36 scores between groups (p = 0.588). Less side-to-side thigh diameter difference was noted in the quadriceps graft group (p = 0.026).ConclusionIn conclusion, similar clinical results, in terms of stability and subjective measures, can be obtained after ACL reconstruction both with a free quadriceps and a 4-strand hamstring tendons autograft.Level of evidenceLevel III, Therapeutic Study.     

ACL reconstruction using an abnormally thick autogenous patellar tendon graft.

This prospective study measured the patellar tendon thickness of 543 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with an autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft to document the normal range of patellar tendon thickness and to determine if using thicker than normal patellar tendons as an ACL graft source affected postoperative outcome. The postoperative results of 55 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with a patellar tendon > or =7 mm thick (thick tendon group) were compared with those of 488 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with a patellar tendon < or =6 mm thick (normal tendon group). 5 mm (4.5 mm in women and 5.3 mm in men) with a range of 3-11 mm (3-7 mm in women and 3-11 mm in men). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative KT-1000 arthrometer mean manual maximum difference (2.0 mm for grafts < or =6 mm thick and 1.9 mm for grafts > or =7 mm thick), postoperative quadriceps muscle strength scores, modified Noyes questionnaire subjective scores (mean of 91 points for grafts < or =6 mm thick and 92 points for grafts > or =7 mm thick), or postoperative stability and pain scores. These results indicate that an abnormally thick patellar tendon should not preclude the use of this involved tendon as a graft source for ACL reconstruction.     

生物骨传导性骨水泥促进前交叉韧带重建术腱骨愈合的研究进展(英文)

近10年来,应用软组织移植物行前交叉韧带重建术越来越普遍。手术的远期疗效主要取决于肌腱移植物能否在骨隧道内达到坚强的腱-骨愈合。但是,目前面临的问题是肌腱移植物在骨隧道内获得腱-骨愈合所需要的时间相当长。研究发现,在腱-骨界面局部应用生物骨传导性的骨水泥能有效地促进肌腱移植物的骨愈合。这类骨水泥主要是磷酸钙。本文就生物骨传导性骨水泥促进前交叉韧带重建术腱-骨愈合的研究进展作一综述。