A comparison of epidural magnesium and/or morphine with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section

BackgroundMagnesium can potentiate the antinociceptive effect of morphine. This prospective randomized double-blinded study was undertaken to establish the analgesic effect of adding magnesium to epidural morphine during cesarean section.MethodsTwo hundred patients undergoing cesarean section under combined spinal–epidural anesthesia were recruited. After administration of intrathecal bupivacaine 10 mg, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four epidural study solutions: 0.1% bupivacaine 10 mL (Group B); 0.1% bupivacaine 10 mL and morphine 1.5 mg (Group B+Mor); 0.1% bupivacaine 10 mL and magnesium 500 mg (Group B+Mg); or 0.1% bupivacaine 10 mL morphine 1.5 mg and magnesium 500 mg (Group B+Mor+Mg). The primary outcome was the area under the curve for visual analog scale pain scores during 36 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included time to the use of rescue analgesics, patient satisfaction and side effects.ResultsPatients in Group B+Mor+Mg had lower for pain scores and area under the curve pain scores both at rest and on movement, increased time for first analgesic request, and increased satisfaction score at 24 h after surgery.ConclusionAddition of magnesium 500 mg and morphine 1.5 mg to epidural 0.1% bupivacaine 10 mL reduced postoperative pain compared with addition of morphine or magnesium alone or no additive.     

A randomized comparison of onset of anesthesia between spinal bupivacaine 5 mg with immediate epidural 2% lidocaine 5 mL and bupivacaine 10 mg for cesarean delivery

BackgroundPrevious studies using low-dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery have focused on hypotension and efficacy. This study evaluated whether, using a combined spinal–epidural technique, there was a difference in onset of anesthesia for cesarean delivery between low-dose spinal with an immediate epidural local anesthetic bolus, and conventional-dose spinal anesthesia.MethodsForty healthy term nulliparous women undergoing elective cesarean delivery with a combined spinal–epidural technique were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients were randomly allocated to the low-dose (Group L) or conventional-dose group (Group C). Patients in Group L received intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine 5 mg with sufentanil 2.5 μg followed by epidural 2% lidocaine 5 mL; patients in Group C received intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine 10 mg with sufentanil 2.5 μg followed by epidural saline 5 mL. The onset of anesthesia (defined as the time from spinal injection to a block to T6), incidence of hypotension, maximal sensory block, epidural supplementation and side effects were recorded.ResultsAll blocks reached T6 within 11 min except for one patient in Group L. There were no differences in onset of anesthesia (9.9 ± 3.2 min in Group L vs. 8.5 ± 1.2 min in Group C, P = 0.08), maximal block level and the number of patients who required epidural supplementation in both groups. Hypotension occurred in 8 patients (40%) in Group L and 15 patients (75%) in Group C (P = 0.02).ConclusionsIntrathecal bupivacaine 5 mg with immediate 2% epidural lidocaine 5 mL provided comparable onset and efficacy of anesthesia as bupivacaine 10 mg with immediate epidural normal saline 5 mL for cesarean delivery.     

Pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine after bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block following cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia

BackgroundTransversus abdominis plane block is an effective method of post-cesarean analgesia. There are no data available about plasma bupivacaine levels after this block in adults. This study aimed to assess bupivacaine pharmacokinetic parameters after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks following cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.MethodsA prospective observational study in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia was conducted. After surgery, patients received bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (50 mg bupivacaine each side). Venous blood samples were collected immediately before performing the block and at 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 720 and 1440 minutes. High performance liquid chromatography was used to measure total plasma bupivacaine concentrations. Mean bupivacaine area under the curve (AUC) was calculated from 0 to 24 hours.ResultsData were collected from 17 parturients. Mean age and body mass index were 31 ± 6 y and 30 ± 4 kg/m² respectively. Mean plasma bupivacaine concentration before the block was 171 ng/mL. Mean peak concentration was 802.36 ng/mL (range 231.8 to 3504.5 ng/mL). Mean time to peak concentration was 30 min and mean area-under-the-curve (0–24 h) was 4505.4 h.ng/mL. Mean elimination half-life was 8.75 h. Three subjects had concentrations above the quoted toxic threshold and mild symptoms suggestive of neurotoxicity were reported by two subjects, but no treatment was required.ConclusionSingle-dose bilateral transversus abdominis plane block using 100 mg of bupivacaine, after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, can result in toxic plasma bupivacaine concentrations.     

Optimal intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine dose with opioids for cesarean delivery: a prospective double-blinded randomized trial

BackgroundSingle-shot spinal anesthesia is commonly used for cesarean delivery. Achieving adequate anesthesia throughout surgery needs to be balanced with associated complications. We investigated the optimal dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine, co-administered with opioids, for anesthesia for cesarean delivery.MethodsThis prospective, randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging trial included parturients scheduled to undergo cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. An epidural catheter was first inserted at the T11–12 vertebral interspace, followed by spinal anesthesia at the L2–3 or L3–4 vertebral interspace. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of seven doses of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12 mg), with added 15 μg fentanyl and 75 μg morphine. Successful induction of anesthesia (success_ind) was defined as achievement of bilateral sensory loss to cold at the T6 dermatome or higher, within 10 minutes. Successful maintenance of anesthesia (success_main) was defined by no epidural supplementation within 60 minutes of intrathecal injection. The effective doses for 50% (ED₅₀) and 95% (ED₉₅) of patients were estimated using logistic regression analysis.ResultsThe ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ for success_main were 6.0 mg (95% CI: 4.5 to 7.5 mg) and 12.6 mg (95% CI: 7.9 to 17.2 mg), respectively. The incidence of respiratory discomfort and maternal satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between dose groups. Phenylephrine dose and nausea/vomiting incidence increased with increasing doses of bupivacaine.ConclusionUnder study conditions, our results suggest that 12.6 mg of intrathecal bupivacaine, administered with fentanyl and morphine, is required to achieve adequate intraoperative analgesia without the need for epidural supplemention.     

Levobupivacaine patient controlled analgesia: Epidural versus blind fascia iliaca compartment analgesia – A comparative study

This study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine patient controlled analgesia epidural versus patient controlled analgesia with fascia lliaca compartment block. In patients undergoing fixation of fracture neck femur.MethodsSixty patients ASA II&III undergoing fixation of fracture neck femur were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 30).Group EEpidural group given levobupivacaine 0.25% 15 ml before induction of general anesthesia, followed by postoperative PCEA with levobupivacaine (0.125%).Group FFascia iliaca block group given levobupivacaine 0.25% 30 ml through the catheter before induction of general anesthesia, followed by postoperative patient controlled fascia illiaca analgesia with levobupivacaine (0.125%).Severity of postoperative pain at rest in 24 h using VAS, number of patients required additional analgesia (tramadol) in 24 h, doses of postoperative 24 h tramadol consumed, postoperative mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded.ResultsThe severity of postoperative pain was statistically significantly less in E group, number of patients required tramadol in 24 h were statistically significantly less in E group than F group, postoperative tramadol consumed was statistically significantly less in E group than F group.ConclusionPCEA with levobupivacaine (0.125%) was associated with satisfactory analgesia than patient controlled analgesia with fascia iliaca block in patients undergoing fixation of fracture neck femur.     

A randomized controlled trial using patient-controlled epidural analgesia with 0.25% versus 0.0625% bupivacaine in nulliparous labor: effect on analgesia requirement and maternal satisfaction

BackgroundThe effect of epidural local anesthetic concentration on analgesic action is still the subject of debate. This study compared the effect of a four-fold change in concentration of bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor.MethodsNulliparous women in early active labor were recruited. All women received analgesic drugs via a lumbar epidural catheter, and all received fentanyl 1 μg/kg with the epidural induction dose and no further opioids throughout the study. Patients were randomized to receive either a 5-mL bolus followed by a 5-mL/h infusion of concentrated (0.25%) bupivacaine or a 20-mL bolus followed by a 20-mL/h infusion of dilute (0.0625%) bupivacaine. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia of the study solution was then used to assess additional analgesia requirements. Analgesic requirement, maternal satisfaction and obstetric outcome were compared.ResultsFor subjects receiving 0.25% bupivacaine, the median total dose of drug administered was greater (117 vs. 90 mg, P = 0.0008), and the mean maternal satisfaction score was less (82 vs. 93, P = 0.04) than with the 0.0625% solution.ConclusionsLarger volumes of more dilute solutions may result in dose sparing and provide more effective labor analgesia. This study supports the continued trend towards dilute local anesthetic mixtures for labor epidural analgesia.     

Risk factors for failed conversion of labor epidural analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational trials

BackgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates evidence for seven risk factors associated with failed conversion of labor epidural analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia.MethodsOnline scientific literature databases were searched using a strategy which identified observational trials, published between January 1979 and May 2011, which evaluated risk factors for failed conversion of epidural analgesia to anesthesia or documented a failure rate resulting in general anesthesia.Results1450 trials were screened, and 13 trials were included for review (n = 8628). Three factors increase the risk for failed conversion: an increasing number of clinician-administered boluses during labor (OR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.8–5.5), greater urgency for cesarean delivery (OR = 40.4, 95% CI 8.8–186), and a non-obstetric anesthesiologist providing care (OR = 4.6, 95% CI 1.8–11.5). Insufficient evidence is available to support combined spinal–epidural versus standard epidural techniques, duration of epidural analgesia, cervical dilation at the time of epidural placement, and body mass index or weight as risk factors for failed epidural conversion.ConclusionThe risk of failed conversion of labor epidural analgesia to anesthesia is increased with an increasing number of boluses administered during labor, an enhanced urgency for cesarean delivery, and care being provided by a non-obstetric anesthesiologist. Further high-quality studies are needed to evaluate the many potential risk factors associated with failed conversion of labor epidural analgesia to anesthesia for cesarean delivery.     

Is the combination of epidural clonidine–levobupivacaine has same analgesic efficacy and safety as the combination fentanyl–levobupivacaine after radical cystectomy?

ObjectiveThis study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of addition of two drugs; clonidine versus fentanyl to epidural levobupivacaine to control postoperative pain after radical cystectomy surgery.Patients and MethodsAll urinary bladder cancer patients of both sex, ASA I and II, 40–70 years undergoing radical cystectomy surgery in National Cancer Institute (NCI) from November 2011 till May 2012 are the target group of which 50 patients accepted to share in the study, they are randomly classified by permuted block technique into two groups; group C (clonidine) who received 6 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25% + clonidine 75 μg epidural bolus dose followed by continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% + clonidine 2 μg/ml at a total rate of 6–10 ml/h, and group F (fentanyl) who received 6 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25% + fentanyl 50 μg bolus dose followed by continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% + fentanyl 2 μg/ml at a total rate of 6–10 ml/h. Paracetamol 1 g IV infusion was used as a rescue pain treatment. In both groups epidural activation is done after complete recovery from balanced general anesthesia. In both groups we measured vital signs (HR, MBP, RR), 0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS) and Sedation using the four-point Ramsay Sedation Scale are assessed for first 24 h postoperatively. In addition we recorded the total 24 h rescue paracetamol dose needed and side effects of both drugs were also observed.ResultsWe found that there is no statistical significant difference between both groups in the vital signs (HR, MBP, and RR), analgesic efficacy (VAS), and Sedation effects (Sedation Scale), and all data were within clinically accepted range. There was no statistically significant difference in total 24 h paracetamol rescue dose needed in both groups with the same range (1–3 g/24 h) and same median value (2 g/24 h). Recorded side effects were minimal and insignificant in both groups.ConclusionWe concluded that both clonidine and fentanyl can be used as effective additive to epidural levobubivacaine for postoperative analgesia after radical cystectomy with no significant difference between them in vital signs, analgesic, sedative effects and safety profile on adding each of them in doses not exceeding 20 μg/h to epidural continuous levobupivacaine infusion.     

The value of epidural magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant to bupivacaine and fentanyl for labor analgesia

ObjectiveWe conducted this clinical study to assess the adjuvant effects of single dose magnesium sulfate (Mg) when administered epidurally during labor with fentanyl and bupivacaine.MethodsEighty healthy nulliparous women in labor requesting epidural analgesia were divided into two groups. Group 1 received bupivacaine 0.125% with magnesium sulfate 50 mg and fentanyl 50 μg as a loading dose; group 2, received bupivacaine 0.125% and fentanyl 50 μg only. Hemodynamic parameters, motor and sensory evaluation, cervical dilation at time of consenting, the progress of labor, the visual analog pain score (VAS), Apgar score, cord blood acid base status, side effects as nausea, vomiting, itching and respiratory depression were recorded. Fetal heart rate tracings were also documented.ResultsEpidural single dose magnesium sulfate added to bupivacaine and fentanyl in labor resulted in significantly faster onset and longer duration of epidural analgesia (169 ± 50 min) in comparison to those patients who received bupivacaine and fentanyl only (105 ± 41 min), also there was a significant reduction in the number of women requiring additional boluses of bupivacaine when Mg was added (P = 0.016). The two groups had no significant differences as regards maternal satisfaction score, maternal and neonatal adverse effects.ConclusionMagnesium sulfate added to bupivacaine and fentanyl for labor epidural analgesia resulted in faster onset, longer duration of action and reduced the break through pain.     

Comparative study of epidural morphine and epidural dexmedetomidine used as adjuvant to levobupivacaine in major abdominal surgery

BackgroundA lot of researches have been done to find an adjuvant in regional anesthesia that inhibits pain without any side effects.AimThis study was conducted to evaluate the onset, extent and duration of sensory and motor block, and side effects of morphine and dexmedetomidine when used as adjuvants to levobupivacaine in epidural anesthesia in major abdominal surgery.Materials and methodsA prospective randomized study was conducted on 60 patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists status I and status II who underwent abdominal surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups; group I levobupivacaine morphine group (LM), group II: levobupivacaine dexmedetomidine group (LD), comprising of 30 patients each. Group I patients received 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine (150 mg) and 0.005 % morphine. Group II patients received 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 1.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine. The onset, extent and duration of sensory and motor blocks, abdominal muscle relaxation, and side effects were recorded.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between the two groups as regards onset of sensory block or sensory level achieved. Time to reach motor block was shorter in the LM group than the LD group. There were no significant differences between the time of total regression of sensory or motor black and abdominal muscle relaxation. As regards side effects, more patients in the LM group suffered from pruritis and more patients suffered from dry mouth in the LD group.ConclusionDexmedetomidine is a good alternative to morphine as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in epidural anesthesia in major abdominal surgeries.     

A comparison between post-operative analgesia after intrathecal nalbuphine with bupivacaine and intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine after cesarean section

BackgroundAdding intrathecal opioids to intrathecal local anesthetics to decrease their doses and provide hemodynamic stability are major goals during spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Different opioids were used to select the one with the longest duration of analgesia and the least side effects. In this study, intrathecal nalbuphine was compared with intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in cesarean section.Patients and methodsSixty female patients of ASA grades I and II presented for elective cesarean deliveries with spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to 2 equal groups; Group F: 30 patients received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml fentanyl (25 μg); Group N: 30 patients received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml nalbuphine (0.8 mg). The onset of sensory and complete motor blockade, time of sensory blockade, duration of analgesia and motor blockade, fetal Apgar score, visual analog scale score, oxygen saturation, adverse effects and hemodynamic parameters were recorded intra-operatively and up to 4 h post-operatively. The effective analgesic time was recorded.ResultsThe onset of complete motor block was significantly more rapid in fentanyl group than in nalbuphine group. The duration of post-operative analgesia was more prolonged in nalbuphine group but the difference was insignificant. No significant difference was found between both groups as regards the duration of sensory block, motor block, duration of analgesia, fetal Apgar score, visual analog scale score, hemodynamic parameters and oxygen saturation. Adverse effects were less common in nalbuphine group but the difference was insignificant.ConclusionEither intrathecal nalbuphine 0.8 mg or intrathecal fentanyl 25 μg combined with 10 mg bupivacaine provides good intra-operative and early post-operative analgesia in cesarean section.     

The effect of bupivacaine with fentanyl temperature on initiation and maintenance of labor epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled study

BackgroundLabor epidural analgesia is highly effective, but can be limited by slow onset and incomplete blockade. The administration of warmed, compared to room temperature, bupivacaine has resulted in more rapid onset epidural anesthesia. We hypothesized that the administration of bupivacaine with fentanyl at 37°C versus 20°C would result in improved initial and ongoing labor epidural analgesia.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized, doubled blinded study, 54 nulliparous, laboring women were randomized to receive epidural bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2 μg/mL (20 mL initial and 6 mL hourly boluses) at either 37°C or 20°C. Pain verbal rating scores (VRS), sensory level, oral temperature, and side effects were assessed after epidural loading (time 0), at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60 min, and at hourly intervals. The primary outcome was the time to achieve initial satisfactory analgesia (VRS ⩽3). Secondary outcomes included ongoing quality of sensory blockade, body temperature and shivering.ResultsThere were no differences between groups in patient demographics, initial pain scores, cervical dilatation, body temperature or mode of delivery. Epidural bupivacaine at 37°C resulted in shorter mean (±SD) analgesic onset time (9.2 ± 4.7 vs. 16.0 ± 10.5 min, P = 0.005) and improved analgesia for the first 15 min after initial bolus (P = 0.001–0.03). Although patient temperature increased during the study (P < 0.01), there were no differences between the groups (P = 0.09). Six (24%) and 10 (40%) patients experienced shivering in the 37°C and 20°C groups, respectively (P = 0.23).ConclusionsThe administration of epidural 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 μg/mL at 37°C versus 20°C resulted in more rapid onset and improved labor analgesia for the first 15 min. There was no evidence of improved ongoing labor analgesia or differences in side effects between groups.     

A comparative study of general anesthesia versus combined spinal–epidural anesthesia on the fetus in cesarean section

BackgroundObstetric anesthesia guidelines recommend regional over general anesthesia for most caesarean sections to decrease the risk for both fetus and mother.Aim of the workTo determine the effects of combined spinal epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia on the newborns and the mother undergoing elective cesarean section.SubjectsA total of 60 consecutive women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at term and scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section at Kasr Al-Aini obstetric hospital participated in this prospective study. The women were divided into 2 groups (each 30), a general anesthesia group (A) and combined spinal–epidural anesthesia group (B).MethodsUmbilical artery blood gas analysis and Apgar scores were assessed at 1 and 5 min after delivery in the newborn while systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and (capnography in general anesthesia) were measured preoperative and after 5, 10 and 15 min of induction of anesthesia in the mothers. In addition, the time from induction of anesthesia till delivery of the fetus and duration in operative room were measured.ResultsApgar score recorded statistically significant differences between the 2 groups at 1 min and 5 min, where with combined spinal–epidural anesthesia the Apgar score readings were higher than with general anesthesia. HCO₃ readings showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups after 1 and 5 min, where the newborns in general anesthesia group had a statistically significant lower HCO₃ compared to the newborns in combined spinal–epidural group. Patients in general anesthesia group were significantly more tachycardic compared to patients in combined spinal–epidural group.ConclusionCombined spinal–epidural anesthesia is safer on the newborn than general anesthesia regarding the APGAR scores and acid–base balance.     

Pulmonary effects of bupivacaine,ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine in parturients undergoing spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean delivery: A randomised controlled study

BackgroundSpinal anaesthesia is the method of choice for elective caesarean delivery, but has been reported to worsen dynamic pulmonary function when using bupivacaine. Similar investigations are lacking for ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. We have therefore compared the pulmonary effects of intrathecal bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine used for caesarean delivery.MethodsForced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in the first second, and peak expiratory flow rate were measured in 48 parturients before and after onset of spinal anaesthesia using either 0.5% bupivacaine 10 mg, 1% ropivacaine 20 mg, or 0.5% levobupivacaine 10 mg. Apgar scores and umbilical arterial pH were recorded.ResultsThe final level of sensory blockade was not different between groups. Forced vital capacity was significantly decreased with bupivacaine (3.6 ± 0.5 L to 3.5 ± 0.4 L, P < 0.05) and ropivacaine (3.2 ± 0.4 L to 3.1 ± 0.5 L, P < 0.05), but not with levobupivacaine (3.6 ± 0.5 L to 3.4 ± 0.6 L). Forced expiratory volume during the first second was not decreased in any group. Peak expiratory flow rate was significantly decreased with ropivacaine (5.5 ± 1.5 L/s to 5.0 ± 1.1 L/s, P < 0.05) and levobupivacaine (from 6.0 ± 1.1 L/s to 5.2 ± 0.9 L/s, P < 0.01). Neonatal vital parameters did not differ between the three groups.ConclusionsDecreases in maternal pulmonary function tests were similar following spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine, ropivacaine, or levobupivacaine for caesarean delivery. The clinical maternal and neonatal effects of these alterations appeared negligible.     

Neuraxial opioids for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: can hydromorphone replace morphine? A retrospective study

BackgroundCesarean delivery is the most common surgical procedure performed in the USA. We evaluated the postoperative analgesic properties of neuraxial hydromorphone compared to neuraxial morphine for post-cesarean delivery analgesia.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed of women who underwent cesarean delivery and received neuraxial anesthesia from March to November 2011 and from March to November 2012. A total of 450 patients received intrathecal morphine 200 μg and 387 patients received intrathecal hydromorphone 60 μg. Eighty-one patients received epidural morphine 3 mg and 102 patients received epidural hydromorphone 0.6 mg.ResultsMedian time to first opioid after intrathecal morphine was 17.0 h versus 14.6 h after intrathecal hydromorphone (P <0.0001). Patients who received intrathecal hydromorphone consumed more opioids in the first 24 h; 37.0 mg versus 26.4 mg oral morphine equivalents (P <0.001). The side effect profile between the intrathecal groups was similar. Median time to first opioid with epidural morphine was 20.1 h versus 13.0 h with epidural hydromorphone (P=0.0007). Total opioid consumption was not significantly different between the epidural groups. The side effect profiles were similar.ConclusionsHydromorphone is a reasonable alternative to morphine for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. With the dosing used in our study, analgesia from morphine lasted longer than hydromorphone via intrathecal and epidural routes; however, neuraxial hydromorphone remains a reasonable option for long-acting analgesia post cesarean delivery.     

A randomized study of maternal serum cytokine levels following cesarean section under general or neuraxial anesthesia

BackgroundCytokines are significant mediators of the immune response to surgery and also play a role in parturition. The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of the anesthetic technique for cesarean section on plasma levels of cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α.MethodsThirty-five parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly assigned to general (n = 18) or neuraxial (n = 17) anesthesia. The general anesthesia group received thiopental 4 mg/kg, succinylcholine 1–1.5 mg/kg and 1% end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane in nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen. The neuraxial anesthesia group received intrathecal 0.5% levobupivacaine 1.8–2.2 mL and epidural fentanyl 1 μg/kg. Blood samples were taken for IL-6 and TNF-α immediately after positioning the parturient on the operating table, after uterine incision and before the umbilical cord clamping and 24 h after surgery (T₁, T₂ and T₃ respectively).ResultsThe two groups did not differ in IL-6 (P = 0.15) or TNF-α (P = 0.73) serum concentrations at any time point. In the general and neuraxial anesthesia groups, IL-6 serum concentrations were significantly higher in the third blood sample, T₃ (12.2 ± 5.0 and 15.2 ± 4.3 pg/mL), than in T₁ (0.41 ± 0.38 and 0.29 ± 0.10 pg/mL) and T₂ (0.37 ± 0.47 and 0.24 ± 0.05) respectively (P < 0.001). Within each group, serum TNF-α concentrations did not differ significantly over time (P = 0.44).ConclusionsUnder the present study design anesthetic technique did not affect IL-6 or TNF-α concentrations in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section. Serum IL-6 levels increased 24 h postoperatively independently of anesthetic technique.     

Role of postoperative continuous subfascial bupivacaine infusion after posterior cervical laminectomy: Randomized control study

IntroductionOne of the major drawbacks of posterior cervical decompression and rigid internal fixation is the severe postoperative neck pain created by extensive soft tissue and muscular dissection. The usual management of acute postsurgical pain consists of systemic opioids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Another satisfying method of postoperative pain relief is continuous local infusion of analgesic agents in posterior subfascial paravertebral space on both sides of the wound using epidural catheters.MethodsSixty patients scheduled for cervical laminectomy with fixation surgery via the posterior midline approach with postoperative epidural catheters placed subfascially on both sides of the wound. They were randomly divided into two groups, bupivacaine group with local infiltration of 0.5% bupivacaine at the rate 2 ml/h, and control group with saline infusion at a rate 2 ml/h. The patient controlled analgesia device (PCA) was given to all patients and set to deliver IV morphine in 1 mg boluses with a lock out at 10 min and a 4 h maximum 10 mg.ResultsThe visual analog score was statistically significant lower in bupivacaine group compared to control group during the first 60 h postoperatively. While in 66 and 72 h postoperatively there was no statistical significant difference was observed between the two groups. The total doses of morphine delivered by PCA in the three postoperative days were statistically significantly higher in control group than bupivacaine group. The incidence of side effects related to narcotics was higher in control than bupivacaine group.ConclusionBilateral subfascial continuous 0.5% bupivacaine infiltration through an ordinary epidural catheter at the rate 2 ml/h for three successive postoperative days is associated with better pain control, reduced narcotics, early ambulation and no serious side effects in the postoperative period in patients undergoing posterior cervical fixation.     

Analgesic requirements and postoperative recovery after scheduled compared to unplanned cesarean delivery: a retrospective chart review

BackgroundStudies examining the effects of various analgesics and anesthetics on postoperative pain following cesarean delivery conventionally use the scheduled cesarean population. This study compares postoperative analgesic requirements and recovery profiles in women undergoing scheduled cesarean compared to unplanned cesarean delivery following labor. We postulated that unplanned cesarean deliveries may increase postoperative analgesic requirements.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of 200 cesarean deliveries at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, California. We examined the records of 100 patients who underwent scheduled cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia (hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg with intrathecal fentanyl 10 μg and morphine 200 μg) and 100 patients that following a trail of labor required unplanned cesarean under epidural anesthesia (10–25 mL 2% lidocaine top-up with epidural morphine 4 mg after clamping of the umbilical cord). We recorded pain scores, analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic request, side effects, and length of hospital stay.ResultsWe found no differences in postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption between scheduled and unplanned cesarean deliveries for up to five days postoperatively. There were no differences in treatment of side effects such as nausea, vomiting, or pruritus (P > 0.05).ConclusionThe results indicate that women experience similar pain and analgesic requirements after scheduled compared to unplanned cesarean delivery. This suggests that the non-scheduled cesarean population may be a suitable pain model to study pain management strategies; and that alterations in pain management are not necessary for the unplanned cesarean delivery population.     

Postural change from lateral to supine is an important mechanism enhancing cephalic spread after injection of intrathecal 0.5% plain bupivacaine for cesarean section

BackgroundSpinal anesthesia is widely used for cesarean section, but the factors that affect the spread of the block in pregnant patients are still not fully explained. This study was designed to investigate the effect of postural changes on sensory block level.MethodsThirty patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under combined spinal–epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups. After intrathecal injection of 0.5% plain bupivacaine 7.5 mg, patients in group S were immediately placed in the supine position with left tilt, patients in group L5 were kept lateral for 5 min and then turned to the supine position with left tilt, and patients in group L10 were kept lateral for 10 min and then turned to the supine position with left tilt.ResultsAt 5 min, median cephalad level of sensory block was lower in groups L5 and L10 compared with group S (corrected P<0.001); at 10 min, median cephalad sensory block level was lower in group L10 compared with group S (corrected P<0.001) and group L5 (corrected P<0.001), and lower in group L5 compared with group S (corrected P=0.033); at 15 min, median cephalad level of sensory block was lower in group L10 compared with group S (corrected P=0.003) and group L5 (corrected P=0.015).ConclusionsIn our population, using 0.5% plain bupivacaine 7.5 mg, postural change from the lateral position to the supine position is an important mechanism enhancing cephalic spread of spinal anesthesia during late pregnancy.     

Effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron on hemodynamic changes and motor and sensory blockade induced by spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing cesarean section

BackgroundSpinal anesthesia has many advantages for cesarean section parturients, but hypotension is considered the most frequent complication and can be managed by different interventions. One of these interventions is to give a serotonin receptor antagonist prior to spinal anesthesia.ObjectivesTo compare between two serotonin receptor antagonists on the hemodynamics, sensory, and motor blockade induced by intrathecal bupivacaine in parturients undergoing cesarean section.Patients and methodsSixty patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia by intrathecal bupivacaine were randomly divided into three groups (20 pregnant females of ASA I–II physical status in each group). Group O received intravenous 4 mg ondansetron diluted in 10 ml normal saline and injected over 1 min, 5 min before spinal anesthesia, group G given intravenous 1 mg granisetron by the same route and group S given 10 ml normal saline. Mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, vasopressor use, sensory, and motor blockade were assessed.ResultsDecreases in mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in group O than groups G and S with lower vasopressor use (P < 0.05), while there was significant faster sensory recovery in group G than groups O and S (P < 0.05). Actually, there were significant decrease in the incidence of nausea in groups O and G than group S (P = 0.008).ConclusionIn parturient females undergoing elective cesarean section, intravenous 4 mg ondansetron before subarachnoid block significantly decreased both the hypotension and the doses of vasopressor used, while intravenous 1 mg granisetron prior to subarachnoid block induced faster sensory recovery compared to both the ondansetron and the saline groups, with no significant differences between the later two groups.