Advancements in the treatment of agitation in Alzheimer’s disease

Introduction: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are associated with significant negative outcomes for patients and their caregivers. Agitation, one of the most distressing NPS, lacks well-established long-term interventions that are both effective and safe. While non-pharmacological interventions are the suggested first-line treatment, it isn’t effective in managing symptoms for every patient. In such cases, clinicians turn to the use of pharmacological interventions. Traditionally, these interventions consist of off-label use of antipsychotics, sedative/hypnotics, anxiolytics, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, memantine and antidepressants, where the efficacy doesn’t necessarily outweigh the associated risks.

Areas covered: Gains made in understanding the neurobiological mechanisms underlying agitation have fueled several recent clinical trials. A comprehensive literature search for published articles evaluating pharmacologic interventions for agitation in AD was done. A review of some of these clinical trials was completed: dextromethorphan/quinidine, scyllo-inositol, brexpiprazole, prazosin, cannabinoids, dronabinol and citalopram show promise in treating agitation.

Expert opinion: Neurobiological findings and enhanced trial designs have re-ignited the area of pharmacological treatment of NPS. Although further research is needed to fully determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of these treatments, the mission to finding effective treatments for NPS such as agitation in patients with dementia is well underway.     

Efficacy of memantine hydrochloride once-daily in Alzheimer’s disease

Introduction: In people with moderate-to-severe dementia in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) memantine provides some clinical benefits. It is commonly administered twice daily at a maximum dose of 20 mg. To improve medication adherence, convenience of use and to enable a higher daily dose, a 28 mg, extended-release formulation of memantine has been developed.

Areas covered: We review the results of a Phase III randomized and controlled trial of memantine extended release as an add-on treatment and compared the findings with a similarly designed previous trial evaluating the immediate release (IR) form.

Expert opinion: Memantine extended release produced minor benefits on cognitive ability, including verbal fluency, behavioral problems and global clinical assessment. There was no difference between the treatment groups on activities of daily living. The observed effects were not larger than those of the IR formulation tested in a similar setting. The lack of impact on activities of daily living suggests that the small improvements in cognition and behavior did not translate into clinically important changes. In conclusion, there is no convincing evidence that the novel once-daily formulation of memantine represents a significant progress in the clinical management of AD that would justify additional treatment costs.     

Future directions in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains the most common of the neurodegenerative disorders. In the elderly, it represents the most frequently occurring form of dementia, especially if considered alongside concomitant cerebrovascular disease. Current treatment involves the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, which have shown symptomatic benefits in the recognised domains of cognition, function and behaviour. While they may have intrinsic disease-modifying activity, this is yet to be proven, and strategies to alter the fundamental neuropathological changes in AD continue to be sought. Much of the evidence suggests that the accumulation of amyloid-β may play a pivotal role, therefore the bulk of current research is focused on possible intervention along the amyloid pathways. However, the abnormal phosphorylation of tau is also a reasonable target and as the molecular basis of AD is better delineated, more targeted treatment approaches are being proposed. This paper reports on the current data that is setting the future directions for research into AD.     

The role of inflammatory processes in Alzheimer’s disease

It has become increasingly clear that inflammatory processes play a significant role in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Neuroinflammation is characterized by the activation of astrocytes and microglia and the release of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Vascular inflammation, mediated largely by the products of endothelial activation, is accompanied by the production and the release of a host of inflammatory factors which contribute to vascular, immune, and neuronal dysfunction. The complex interaction of these processes is still only imperfectly understood, yet as the mechanisms continue to be elucidated, targets for intervention are revealed. Although many of the studies to date on therapeutic or preventative strategies for AD have been narrowly focused on single target therapies, there is accumulating evidence to suggest that the most successful treatment strategy will likely incorporate a sequential, multifactorial approach, addressing direct neuronal support, general cardiovascular health, and interruption of deleterious inflammatory pathways.     

The role of 5 HT6-receptor antagonists in Alzheimer’s disease: an update

Introduction: Despite recent advances in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research, no breakthrough treatments have been discovered. Cholinesterase inhibitors and the NMDA-receptor antagonist memantine are currently the two approved symptomatic treatments for AD. 5-HT6 receptor antagonism has recently emerged as a promising treatment strategy to improve cognition in AD, with a modest side-effect profile.

Areas covered: 5-HT6 receptors, exclusively found in the central nervous system, modulate primarily GABA and glutamate levels, facilitating the secondary release of other neurotransmitters including dopamine, noradrenaline, and acetylcholine, all of which are compromised in AD. This review discusses findings of preclinical and phase I–III clinical trials conducted with three major 5-HT6 receptor antagonists: idalopirdine, intepirdine, and SUVN-502, in the field of AD.

Expert opinion: Despite early positive findings, larger phase-III trials have failed to demonstrate any statistically significant impact on cognition for both idalopirdine and intepirdine, as adjunct to cholinesterase inhibitors. Paradoxically, 5-HT6 receptor agonists have also been shown to have cognitive enhancing properties. Thus, a better understanding of the mechanism of action of the 5-HT6 receptor and its ligands is warranted. Investigating 5-HT6 receptor partial or inverse agonists may be promising in future AD trials.     

Ongoing trials in Alzheimer’s disease

Researchers have sought to understand the underlying pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) ever since Dr A Alzheimer first described the condition in 1907. Unfortunately however, until recently, they have done so with limited success. This lack of clarity has deterred advancements in therapeutic drug research beyond all but the purely symptomatic treatment relief currently available. However, through spatio-temporal analysis of the two types of cerebral lesions that characterise the disorder (senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles) and the compilation of genetic data concerning familial AD, there now exists the foundation for a more comprehensive understanding of the disease. Although symptomatic cholinergic strategies have beneficial effects, their benefits are modest and current research has turned to the development of other promising strategies, including oestrogen replacement, anti-inflammatory agents, free radical scavengers, anti-oxidants and monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors. Many of these strategies may have some merit, however further analysis and structured research are necessary before a definitive decision can be made about their efficacy and possible role in AD therapy. Strategies that are directed at halting the underlying biochemical changes in AD are nearing clinical testing and offer the promise for meaningful therapeutic outcomes.     

Pharmacotherapeutic strategies in the treatment of severe Alzheimer’s disease

Introduction: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a slowly progressive neurodegenerative disease. Patients with severe AD often require assistance with daily functioning and have a substantially higher probability of admission to nursing homes compared to the general population.

Areas covered: Medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of severe AD include the cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs), donepezil (10 and 23 mg/day) and rivastigmine (transdermal patch, 13.3 mg/24 hours), and the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine (immediate- and extended-release formulations). This article will review the efficacy, safety, and tolerability data of these agents in the treatment of severe AD. Issues related to combination therapy, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and treatment discontinuation are also discussed.

Expert opinion: AD therapeutics provide benefits on measures of cognition, functioning, behavior, and global status even in the severe stages of AD. Combination therapy with memantine and ChEIs may provide additive benefits compared with ChEI monotherapy. Decisions regarding discontinuation of these medications should be made on a case-by-case basis, with some evidence suggesting that discontinuation may worsen cognition and functional impairment. It is recommended that patients entering the terminal stages of AD discontinue all medications not necessary for comfort.     

Usefulness of an elemental diet in Crohn’s disease

Crohn’s disease is a chronic relapsing disease for which no complete cure is available. Although drug therapy with agents such as corticosteroids and azathiopurine is useful, the long-term side effects of these drugs are problematic. The advent of infliximab has recently brought a change in treatment, but the long-term side effects of this agent remain uncertain. In contrast, nutritional therapy produces no druginduced side effects and is effective in inducing and maintaining remission. However, sufficient efficacy cannot be expected in patients in whom compliance with nutritional regimens gradually decreases owing to unpalatability. In these cases, combination therapy with agents such as immunosuppressors and infliximab may be useful. Received 6 August 2006; accepted 4 September 2006     

β-Amyloid therapies in Alzheimer’s disease

Neurones in the brain produce β-amyloid (Aβ) fragments from a larger precursor molecule termed the amyloid precursor protein (APP). When released from the cell, these protein fragments may accumulate in extracellular amyloid plaques and consequently hasten the onset and progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). β-Amyloid fragments are generated through the action of specific proteases within the cell. Two of these enzymes, β- and γ-secretase, are particularly important in the formation of Aβ as they cleave within the APP protein to give rise to the N-terminal and C-terminal ends of the Aβ fragment, respectively. Consequently, many researchers are investigating therapeutic approaches that inhibit either β- or γ-secretase activity, with the ultimate goal of limiting Aβ production. An alternative AD therapeutic approach that is being investigated is to employ anti-Aβ antibodies to dissolve plaques that have already formed. Both of these approaches focus on the possibility that accrual of Aβ leads to neuronal degeneration and cognitive impairment characterised by AD and test the hypothesis that limiting Aβ deposition in neuritic plaques may be an effective treatment for AD.     

Pharmacological management of behavioral disturbances in patients with Alzheimer’s disease

ABSTRACT

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) inevitably occur during the course of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) including psychosis, aggression, and depression. The effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for NPS has been limited because of their lack of efficacy, discontinuation due to undesirable adverse events, or poor adherence. In recent consensus guidelines, non-pharmacological treatments for NPS have been prioritized as first-line management strategies. Pharmacological treatments for severe NPS should be administrated as a second-line approach, and have been suggested to be started at a lower dosage followed by titration to a minimum effective dosage and for a limited time period. However, recent studies have shown that some patients receiving pharmacological treatments do not exhibit treatment efficacy in comparison with placebo. The concurrence of several sub-symptoms in NPS makes it difficult to target one symptom exclusively. Therefore, the current review focuses on a strategy for such refractory NPS in patients with AD. Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that the severity of NPS gradually reduces in a time-dependent manner regardless of active treatments. Therefore, clinicians should consider potential causes of NPS sub-symptoms from multifactorial aspects and select alternative treatments (e.g. neuromodulation or relocation into specialized care units) during the long-term disease course.     

Implication of Complement System and its Regulators in Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects approximately 24 million people worldwide. A number of different risk factors have been implicated in AD, however, neuritic (amyloid) plaques are considered as one of the defining risk factors and pathological hallmarks of the disease. Complement proteins are integral components of amyloid plaques and cerebral vascular amyloid in Alzheimer brains. They can be found at the earliest stages of amyloid deposition and their activation coincides with the clinical expression of Alzheimer''s dementia. This review emphasizes on the dual key roles of complement system and complement regulators (CRegs) in disease pathology and progression. The particular focus of this review is on currently evolving strategies for design of complement inhibitors that might aid therapy by restoring the fine balance between activated components of complement system, thus improving the cognitive performance of patients. This review discusses these issues with a view to inspiring the development of new agents that could be useful for the treatment of AD.Key Words: Alzheimer’s disease, neurodegeneration, inflammation, β-amyloid peptide, complement, complement regulators, CD59, complement therapeutics.     

Pivotal role of nitrogen heterocycles in Alzheimer’s disease drug discovery

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a detrimental neurodegenerative disease that progressively worsens with time. Clinical options are limited and only provide symptomatic relief to AD patients. The search for effective anti-AD compounds is ongoing with a few already in Phase III clinical trials, yet to be approved. Heterocycles containing nitrogen are important to biological processes owing to their abundance in nature, their function as subunits of biological molecules and/or macromolecular structures, and their biological activities. The present review discusses previously used strategies, SAR, relevant in vitro and in vivo studies, and success stories of nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds in AD drug discovery. Also, we propose strategies for designing and developing novel potent anti-AD small molecules that can be used as treatments for AD.     

Use of Benzodiazepines in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review of Literature

Background:

Benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Unfortunately, studies evaluating their benefits and risks in these patients are limited.

Methods:

Clinical trials focusing on the effect of benzodiazepines on cognitive functions, disease progression, behavioral symptoms, sleep disturbances, and the general frequency of benzodiazepine use were included in this review. Published articles from January 1983 to January 2015 were identified using specific search terms in MEDLINE and PubMed Library according to the recommendations of The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology initiative.

Results:

Of the 657 articles found, 18 articles met predefined selection criteria and were included in this review (8 on frequency, 5 on cognitive functions, 5 on behavioral and sleep disturbances). The frequency of benzodiazepine use ranged from 8.5% to 20%. Five studies reported accelerated cognitive deterioration in association with benzodiazepine use. Two studies reported clinical efficacy for lorazepam and alprazolam to reduce agitation in Alzheimer’s disease patients. No evidence was found for an improvement of sleep quality using benzodiazepines.

Conclusion:

This systematic review shows a relatively high prevalence of benzodiazepine use but limited evidence for clinical efficacy in Alzheimer’s disease patients. However, there is a paucity of methodologically high quality controlled clinical trials. Our results underscore a need for randomized controlled trials in this area.     

Disease-Induced Alterations in Brain Drug Transporters in Animal Models of Alzheimer’s Disease

Purpose

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may disturb functions of the blood-brain barrier and change the disposition of drugs to the brain. This study assessed the disease-induced changes in drug transporters in the brain capillaries of transgenic AD mice.

Methods

Eighteen drug transporters and four tight junction-associated proteins were analyzed by RT-qPCR in cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum tissue samples of 12–16-month-old APdE9, Tg2576 and APP/PS1 transgenic mice and their healthy age-matched controls. In addition, microvessel fractions enriched from 1-3-month-old APdE9 mice were analyzed using RT-qPCR and Western blotting. Brain transport of methotrexate in APdE9 mice was assessed by in vivo microdialysis.

Results

The expression profiles of studied genes were similar in brain tissues of AD and control mice. Instead, in the microvessel fraction in APdE9 mice, >2-fold alterations were detected in the expressions of 11 genes but none at the protein level. In control mice strains, >5-fold changes between different brain regions were identified for Slc15a2, Slc22a3 and occludin. Methotrexate distribution into hippocampus of APdE9 mice was faster than in controls.

Conclusions

The expression profile of mice carrying presenilin and amyloid precursor protein mutations is comparable to controls, but clear regional differences exist in the expression of drug transporters in brain.

     

Progress in acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease

Current pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) involves drugs that are known as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), which increase the acetylcholine concentration in the brain. Although effective in improving cognitive, behavioural and functional impairments, these drugs are not able to alter disease progression. In this review, the recent patent literature on AChEIs from 2002 to early 2005 will be discussed, focusing attention on the novel analogues of the approved drugs, as well as on the most important AD therapeutic advances. The clinical efficacy of AChEIs will probably be enhanced by their combination with other drugs acting through different pharmacological mechanisms. As the neuronal loss comprises more than the forebrain cholinergic system, the weak effectiveness of AChEIs is not surprising. Besides the ‘cholinergic hypothesis’ approaches, new treatments are emerging based on multipotent compounds able to target the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of AD; these treatments are summarised herein.     

Efficacy of rivastigmine tartrate,transdermal system,in Alzheimer’s disease

Introduction: As the most common major neurocognitive disorder, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) will play an increasingly important role both socially and financially as the population ages. Approved treatments for AD are symptomatic in nature and show modest improvements in cognition and global functioning among patients with AD.

Areas Covered: This article focuses on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of the transdermal patch form of the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine. The rivastigmine transdermal system is approved for the treatment of patients with mild, moderate, and severe AD. Three randomized trials have shown the rivastigmine patch to be efficacious and tolerable across all stages of AD.

Expert Opinion: The rivastigmine patch offers several advantages over the capsule form, including decreased peak to trough plasma fluctuations, reduced rates of nausea and vomiting, better treatment adherence, higher probability of reaching the target dose, ease of administration, and greater satisfaction among caregivers. These factors may be especially important in patients with severe AD, in which patients are more vulnerable to adverse side effects from higher doses. While the patch is more expensive than generic therapies, patient populations that may benefit from the patch include those that are particularly sensitive to GI side effects, have chronic gastrointestinal problems, have difficulty swallowing medications, or have failed to respond with high doses of other generic options.     

NMDA Neurotransmission Dysfunction in Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Alzheimer’s Disease

Dementia has become an all-important disease because the population is aging rapidly and the cost of health care associated with dementia is ever increasing. In addition to cognitive function impairment, associated behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) worsen patient’s quality of life and increase caregiver’s burden. Alzheimer’s disease is the most common type of dementia and both behavioral disturbance and cognitive impairment of Alzheimer’s disease are thought to be associated with the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) dysfunction as increasing evidence of dysfunctional glutamatergic neurotransmission had been reported in behavioral changes and cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. We review the literature regarding dementia (especially Alzheimer’s disease), BPSD and relevant findings on glutamatergic and NMDA neurotransmission, including the effects of memantine, a NMDA receptor antagonist, and NMDA-enhancing agents, such as D-serine and D-cycloserine. Literatures suggest that behavioral disturbance and cognitive impairment of Alzheimer’s disease may be associated with excitatory neurotoxic effects which result in impairment of neuronal plasticity and degenerative processes. Memantine shows benefits in improving cognition, function, agitation/aggression and delusion in Alzheimer’s disease. On the other hand, some NMDA modulators which enhance NMDA function through the co-agonist binding site can also improve cognitive function and psychotic symptoms. We propose that modulating NMDA neurotransmission is effective in treating behavioral and psychological symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease. Prospective study using NMDA enhancers in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and associated behavioral disturbance is needed to verify this hypothesis.     

The potential role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in treating Alzheimer’s disease

Epidemiological studies suggest that long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may protect against Alzheimer's disease (AD). Despite encouraging evidence, all large, long-term, placebo-controlled clinical trials aimed at reducing inflammation in the brain of AD patients produced negative results. More recently it has been shown that some NSAIDs decrease the production of amyloid-β_1-42 (Aβ42), the major component of senile plaques of the AD brain, and counteract the progression of Aβ42 pathology in transgenic mouse models of AD. The proposed mechanism for this activity is an allosteric modulation of γ-secretase activity, the enzyme responsible for the formation of amyloid-β. The inhibition of Aβ42 production is independent from the anti-cyclooxygenase (COX) activity and is related to the chemical structure of the compounds, with some NSAIDs being active (ibuprofen, sulindac, flurbiprofen, indomethacin, diclofenac) and others not (naproxen, aspirin, celecoxib). This could explain the negative results of the large AD trials carried out so far, as they were conducted with compounds (naproxen, hydroxychloroquine, dapsone, prednisone, rofecoxib and celecoxib) that are not able to decrease Aβ42 production. Unfortunately, the use of these NSAIDs in AD is hampered by a significant gastrointestinal toxicity associated with COX inhibition. Thus, new NSAID analogues are being developed with potent and selective inhibitory activity on Aβ42 but with either lack of COX inhibitory activity or reduced gastrointestinal toxicity potential.