Achieved platelet aggregation inhibition after different antiplatelet regimens during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the extent of platelet aggregation inhibition in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), treated with different antiplatelet agents and dosages. BACKGROUND: The extent of platelet aggregation inhibition is an independent predictor of major cardiac events after elective PCI. In STEMI patients undergoing PCI, routine dose of antiplatelet agents may be associated with less effective platelet aggregation inhibition. METHODS: Patients were treated with clopidogrel before angiography and randomized to abciximab, tirofiban, high-dose tirofiban, or no glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor; GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor bolus, followed by maintenance infusion, was administered after angiography, but before PCI. Platelet aggregation inhibition was assessed before angiography, immediately after PCI, and 1 and 6 h afterwards. RESULTS: The total study population consisted of 112 patients. Platelet aggregation inhibition was variable for individuals and suboptimal for all agents, particularly in the periprocedural period. Only with high-dose tirofiban, mean periprocedural platelet aggregation inhibition exceeded 80%. Angiographic parameters after PCI were not different between the groups. No relationship was found between the level of platelet aggregation and parameters of PCI success (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count and myocardial blush grade), after combining the data from all four groups studied. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet aggregation inhibition in STEMI patients undergoing PCI, treated with antiplatelet agents, is variable and suboptimal for all agents and dosages studied. Only with high-dose tirofiban, mean periprocedural platelet aggregation inhibition exceeded 80%. However, no relationship of platelet aggregation inhibition and angiographic outcome was found in this patient cohort.     

Safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in urgent or emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Approximately 2% to 4% of patients undergo urgent or emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after treatment with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors play a large role in determining the safety of their use in the setting of urgent or emergency CABG procedures. Emergency or urgent CABG after treatment with the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, abciximab, may be associated with increased risk of hemorrhage and the requirement of platelet transfusions if surgery is performed within 12 h of abciximab discontinuation. Eptifibatide is associated with a similar risk compared with placebo, even when surgery is performed within 2 h of eptifibatide cessation. Limited data for tirofiban show that bleeding is not increased when compared with acetylsalicylic acid or heparin. Eptifibatide and tirofiban appear to have favourable safety profiles compared with abciximab in the setting of emergency or urgent CABG after failed PCI.     

Profound thrombocytopenia associated with tirofiban: case report and review of literature

Platelet glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa inhibitors prevent fibrinogen binding and platelet aggregation. Inhibition of platelet activity at the injured coronary plaque is a target for novel therapeutic strategies. They decrease ischemic complications associated with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. Thrombocytopenia is a serious complication well described with the use of the prototype GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab. Its association with other agents of this class has been underemphasized. It is important to monitor platelet counts closely after initiation of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy, not only for abciximab, but also for small molecule inhibitors such as eptifibatide and tirofiban. Monitoring of platelet counts at 2 to 6 hours and 24 hours will detect most cases of acute thrombocytopenia. Adverse events may be prevented by prompt discontinuation of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy. The authors present a case of profound thrombocytopenia after the administration of tirofiban in the treatment of a patient with an acute coronary syndrome.     

Update on Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade in Endovascular Interventions

Platelet aggregation plays a central role in the ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and the acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although aspirin and heparin have been effective at decreasing adverse events in these settings, the perceived need for more potent inhibition of platelet aggregation has led to targeting of the platelet surface membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) receptor. Several agents have been developed; four: abciximab, tirofiban, eptifibatide, and lamifiban have been tested in clinical trials. Overall, the positive findings of these studies have supported the hypothesis that enhanced platelet blockade leads to improved clinical outcomes in the settings of PCI and ACS. In this article, an overview of the various GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors is presented. The clinical trials of these agents as adjunctive therapy for patients undergoing PCI and in treatment of acute myocardial infarction are reviewed. Practical considerations relating to clinical efficacy, drug safety, and economic issues are discussed.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during percutaneous coronary intervention: IIb or Not IIb,what is the question?

Over the past decade, numerous placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials have documented robust clinical benefits of intravenous platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This evidence has led to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and indication for use of two GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors at the time of PCI, namely, the chimeric monoclonal antibody fragment abciximab (ReoPro, Centocor, Inc. and Eli Lilly & Company) and the cyclic heptapeptide small molecule eptifibatide (Integrilin, COR Therapeutics and Key Pharmaceuticals). Currently, another small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, tirofiban (Aggrastat, Merck & Company), which (similar to eptifibatide) is approved for the medical therapy of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS), has not received indication for use in the PCI setting. Although the clinical benefits of both abciximab and eptifibatide administered at the time of PCI have been proven in randomized clinical trials, only abciximab has demonstrated a late survival advantage in patients following PCI. Evidence in support of the presence, magnitude and possible mechanisms for abciximab survival advantage is herein reviewed.     

Variability in extent of platelet function inhibition after administration of optimal dose of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers in patients undergoing a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

The Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay was used to measure the inhibition of platelet aggregation at baseline and 10 minutes and 8 hours after starting therapy in 114 patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the planned use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The abciximab-treated patients received a 0.25 mg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.125 microg/kg/min infusion for 12 hours; the eptifibatide-treated patients received 2 boluses of 180 microg/kg administered 10 minutes apart, followed by a 2 microg/kg/min infusion for 24 hours; the tirofiban-treated patients received a 25 microg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion for 18 hours. Ten minutes after starting therapy, the mean level of platelet inhibition was 86 +/- 9% for abciximab, 92 +/- 6% for eptifibatide, and 95 +/- 5% for tirofiban (p <0.001); > or =95% platelet inhibition was achieved in 29% of the patients treated with abciximab, 44% of those receiving eptifibatide, and 68% of the those receiving tirofiban (p = 0.02). In conclusion, at the evaluated doses, tirofiban seemed to be the most effective drug in achieving "optimal" platelet inhibition very early after percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Time course, magnitude, and consistency of platelet inhibition by abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces platelet-mediated adverse ischemic outcomes. Although abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for use, these agents differ in their pharmacodynamic profiles. Each of these agents has been compared in randomized trials with placebo for patients undergoing PCI, but no randomized comparative studies of these agents have been performed. We compared ex vivo platelet function by both standard light transmission aggregometry and rapid platelet function assay during and after administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban in approved dose regimens on a randomized basis at the time of PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris. A reduced intensity of platelet inhibition by light transmission aggregometry was observed for tirofiban compared with either eptifibatide or abciximab. In addition, the 30-minute bolus strategy used for tirofiban was associated with delayed onset of maximal platelet inhibition relative to the initiation of bolus infusion. Whether the trends in platelet function observed in this study will be translated into differences in clinical outcomes awaits definition by larger scale randomized clinical trials comparing these platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.     

GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI: New trial and registry data

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with adjunctive glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor therapy administered in the cardiac catheterization laboratory is the optimal reperfusion strategy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Most available data regarding these agents are from trials comparing abciximab to placebo alone. Noninferiority trials comparing small-molecule GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, such as tirofiban and eptifibatide with abciximab, have used markers for myocardial reperfusion as primary end points but are underpowered to detect significant differences in hard clinical outcomes. Such a trial would need to enroll a very large number of patients and thus make it practically impossible to perform. Registry data reveal that most patients undergoing primary PCI are treated with small-molecule GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in clinical practice, and no observed difference is observed in safety and efficacy when compared with patients treated with abciximab therapy.     

Differential Effects of Citrate Versus PPACK Anticoagulation on Measured Platelet Inhibition by Abciximab, Eptifibatide and Tirofiban

Background: High levels of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition are required to prevent arterial thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. Ex-vivo turbidometric platelet aggregation in citrate anticoagulated blood samples has been the primary method previously utilized to derive dose regimens for administering platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Enhanced GP IIb/IIIa binding and inhibition of platelet aggregation for eptifibatide secondary to citrate induced reduction of ionized plasma calcium concentrations has been reported. Methods/Results: We evaluated the differential effects of citrate versus PPACK anticoagulation on turbidometric platelet inhibition in normal volunteers by eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. The decrease in ionized calcium afforded by citrate was associated with enhanced in vitro platelet inhibition for all three GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, including abciximab. The magnitude of citrate effect was greatest for eptifibatide. Both tirofiban and abciximab have similar citrate calcium chelation associated enhancement of measured platelet inhibition.Conclusion: Accurate assessment and comparison of platelet inhibition by GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors may require avoidance of calcium chelating anticoagulants.     

Platelet inhibition with tirofiban early during percutaneous coronary intervention: dosing revisited.

Platelet inhibition is central to the efficacy of the intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. Differences in the degree of platelet inhibition achieved with these agents may account for the disparity in clinical efficacy noted in recently completed clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ex vivo platelet inhibition with tirofiban in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and who were referred for percutaneous coronary interventions. Twenty-five patients were studied. Ten patients received tirofiban 10 microg/kg bolus and 0.15 microg/kg infusion for 16 hr. Platelet inhibition was determined at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after tirofiban, by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), rapid platelet function assay (RPFA), and platelet works (PW). The average platelet inhibition using RPFA with PPACK, was 87% at 5 min, then decreased to a nadir of 72% at 30 min and recovered back to > 80% at 60 min and onward. Similar trends were noted with RPFA-citrate, PW, and LTA. Ca-chelating anticoagulants (EDTA and citrate) overestimated platelet inhibition at all time points. Dose adjustment was done by increasing the bolus (15 microg/kg) in five patients, increasing the maintenance dose (0.2 microg/kg/min) in five patients, and increasing both the bolus and the maintenance dose in another five patients. Platelet inhibition tested by all the above methods was consistently over 90% when both the bolus and maintenance doses were increased. No increased incidence of major bleeding was noted at this adjusted dose. The current dosing of tirofiban may be inadequate to achieve appropriate platelet inhibition during PCI in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and receiving tirofiban immediately before the procedure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Dose adjustment may be needed to maximize platelet inhibition early during PCI.     

Administration of abciximab to patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide: effect on platelet function.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate platelet function and to preliminarily assess the clinical safety of sequential treatment with tirofiban or eptifibatide followed by abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: An increasing number of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are treated early with tirofiban or eptifibatide. Some later require PCI and may benefit from switching to abciximab, for which long-term benefits have been reported. METHODS: Fifty ACS patients planned for PCI were enrolled. Twenty-five patients received tirofiban followed by abciximab. Ten patients received eptifibatide followed by abciximab. Fifteen patients received only abciximab. All patients had blood samples drawn six times during the therapeutic course. Platelet function was evaluated by ADP- and TRAP-induced aggregation, flow cytometry analysis of fibrinogen binding and the cone and plate(let) analyzer, which tests shear rate-dependent platelet activation. RESULTS: Administered after tirofiban, abciximab caused a significant further decline in platelet function, as evidenced by all methods. Administered after eptifibatide, abciximab caused a significant further reduction in platelet function, as assessed by the cone and plate(let) analyzer and fibrinogen binding methods. The platelet inhibition achieved by the combination therapy was always greater than or equal to that achieved by abciximab alone. There were no major bleeding or severe thrombocytopenia episodes. Three of the 35 combination therapy patients and one of the 15 who received abciximab alone had minor bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first in vivo study of combination intravenous platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy. Administration of abciximab immediately after tirofiban or eptifibatide therapy effectively inhibits platelet function and appears to be safe.     

Platelet inhibition by increased tirofiban dosing during primary coronary angioplasty for ST elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Platelet receptor IIb/IIIa inhibition during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) decreases incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). These effects directly result from the level of platelet inhibition. Due to existing data indicating that standard dosing of tirofiban is insufficient for optimal platelet inhibition, we proposed a novel, experimental dosing. AIM: In this study we assessed, with the use of Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay (RFPA), the level of platelet inhibition with increased tirofiban dosing during primary PCI for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: Twenty eight patients (22 males, 6 females, mean age 63 years, range 32-78 years) with STEMI were included into the study. All patients received 300 mg of aspirin, iv. heparin in a dose of 10 000 IU, which was followed by platelet receptor GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban - 10 micro g/kg iv bolus, 0.4 micro g/kg/min for 30 min and infusion 0.1 micro g/kg/min continued for 12-24 h. Platelet function was assessed with RFPA before tirofiban administration and after 10, 30, 90 minutes as well as 8 hours from the initial dose of tirofiban. Baseline fibrinogen binding to platelet receptor IIb/IIIa was defined as PAU (platelet aggregation unit) and the effects of tirofiban on platelets were expressed as a percentage of platelet inhibition. RESULTS: During in-hospital stay, no deaths, re-infarction nor recurrences of ischaemia requiring intervention were noted. The mean total duration of tirofiban administration was 21 hours. Thrombocytopenia was not observed in any patient. Bleeding complications occurred in 5 (17.9%) patients. Blood transfusion was required in three patients. The percentages of platelet inhibition measured at the pre-specified time-points were 95%, 94%, 91% and 87%, respectively. In 32% of patients an inhibition of platelet exceeding 95%, measured 10 minutes from the onset of tirofiban infusion, was not achieved. At the same time, platelet inhibition <90% was found in only 3 (11%) patients. Eight hours from the initiation of tirofiban, platelet inhibition <70% was found in 3 (11%) patients; of them, two had platelet inhibition <95% when measured 10 minutes from the onset of therapy with tirofiban. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Increased dosing of tirofiban resulted in an enhanced platelet inhibition. 2. Optimal platelet inhibition, especially during first minutes of drug administration, was not achieved in a substantial number of patients. 3. Increased IIb/IIIa inhibitor dosing resulted in a high partial and normal baseline coronary flow in an infarct-related artery. 4. Increased tirofiban dosing resulted in a relatively high bleeding complications rate.     

Drip and Ship: A New Strategy for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors block the final common pathway of platelet aggregation by preventing fibrinogen from binding to the GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor. In patients with unstable angina (UA) or a non–Q wave myocardial infarction (NQWMI), including those with UA refractory to medical therapy, these agents decrease the risk of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and recurrent ischemia. Most patients with acute coronary syndromes are managed in hospitals without on-site angioplasty capabilities and often require transfer for an interventional procedure. We propose that GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors can be safely initiated at the referring hospital. We studied 20 patients with UA/NQWMI in whom therapy with a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, in addition to standard medical therapy, was initiated prior to transfer for an urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (drip and ship). The primary end point was a composite of death, MI, and recurrent ischemia at 30 days. Twelve patients were treated with abciximab, 5 patients were treated with tirofiban, and 3 patients initially treated with tirofiban were converted to abciximab. Procedural success occurred in 33 out of 36 (92%) lesions and 18 out of 20 (90%) patients. At 30 days, 4 out of 20 (20%) patients had recurrent ischemia. The PTCA sites were widely patent in the 3 patients who underwent repeat angiography. The fourth patient had an unsuccessful PCI and was referred for coronary artery bypass surgery. There were no MIs or deaths. Patients who require transfer for an urgent PCI can be managed safely and efficaciously by initiating a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, in addition to standard medical therapy, prior to transfer.     

Short-Term Comparative Outcomes Associated with the Use of GP IIb/IIIa Antagonists in Patients Undergoing Coronary Intervention

Background:Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists reduce the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and urgent revascularization among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite a similar mechanism of platelet inhibition, the three currently approved agents vary widely in cost. Purpose: The purpose of this prospectively designed, retrospective analysis was to determine clinical outcomes for patients receiving abciximab, tirofiban or eptifibatide as adjunctive therapy during PCI at a single center. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes during hospitalization following PCI in patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide compared with those patients who received abciximab. Outcomes examined included in-hospital mortality, hemorrhagic procedural complications, need for recatheterization, peak creatine kinase following intervention and length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: Two hundred and sixty seven consecutive patients in whom GP IIb/IIIa antagonist therapy was initiated in the catheterization laboratory for PCI were analyzed. Abciximab-treated patients were more likely to be undergoing primary (p<0.001) and rescue (p=0.022) PCI and to have received fibrinolytic therapy (p=0.013) when compared to patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide. There were no significant differences between abciximab- and non abciximab-treated patients in either the primary PCI or non primary PCI groups in any of the studied endpoints. In patients undergoing primary PCI, abciximab-treated patients when compared with non abciximab-treated patients exhibited a trend toward an increase in hospital LOS (7.8±7.0 d vs 6.2±3.9, p=0.19) and in the frequency of hemmorhagic complications (22.1% vs 5.3%, p=0.11). In patients not receiving fibrinolytic therapy, abciximab-treated patients experienced a trend toward increased hemmorhagic complications following PCI when compared to non abciximab-treated patients (10.2% vs 6.0%, p=0.28). Complications distant from the vascular access site comprised 62.5% of hemmorhagic complications in the abciximab-treated group, but only 20% of the complications in the non-abciximab treated population (p<0.001). These data suggest no differences in acute outcomes between groups of patients receiving abciximab or other approved GP IIb/IIIa antagonists highlighting a potential significant cost saving. These data will require interpretation following the publication of comparative trials.     

Pharmacodynamic and clinical trials of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and potential relationship of results to dosing

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have become the standard of care for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and for those presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-ACS). Clinical effects of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in PCI and NSTE-ACS strongly correlate with potency, consistency, and durability of platelet aggregation inhibition. Under standardized conditions [light transmission aggregometry (LTA), 20 micromol adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as an agonist, and D-phenylalanyl-L-propyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone (PPACK) as an anticoagulant], we demand consistent platelet aggregation inhibition >80% during the time of PCI (initial balloon inflation), and during the entire duration of therapy in NSTE-ACS. The benefit of abciximab (bolus 0.25 mg/kg plus infusion 10 microg/kg/min) correlates with >80% inhibition of platelet aggregation during the intervention (PCI) and immediately thereafter (<6 hours). The absence of a benefit with abciximab in NSTE-ACS is most likely due to <80% inhibition during the major part of the infusion period (>6 hours). Tirofiban does not achieve >80% inhibition at the time of PCI at a dose of 10 microg/kg bolus plus 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion, and at a dose of 0.4 lg/kg/min loading infusion for 30 minutes plus 0.1 microg/kg/min maintenance infusion, the target value is only reached after 18 h. Eptifibatide (double-bolus 180 microg/kg 10 min apart, followed immediately by a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion) provided an instant, consistent, and durable antiplatelet effect for the entire duration of infusion, and a significant clinical benefit in both PCI (non-ACS patients) and medically managed NSTE-ACS patients.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors including abciximab, eptifibatide and tirofiban have been studied extensively as short-term adjuncts to short-term heparin and indefinite aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions on native vessels. The drugs provide a small advantage in the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and need for revascularization at 30 days (1-2% of treated patients) at the expense of an increase in major and potentially fatal bleeding complications (1% of treated patients over heparin plus aspirin alone). Highest-risk patients appear to benefit the most; clopidogrel should also be considered in these patients. Patients undergoing percutaneous interventions on bypass grafts do not benefit. Whether one GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor is superior to another is incompletely clarified. Abciximab causes severe immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (<20,000/microl) in 0.7% of cases; this is more often than eptifibatide or tirofiban (0.2%). Pseudothrombocytopenia should be differentiated. Effective use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors for acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary interventions requires discerning clinical judgment. The value of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors is not established in other forms of vascular disease.     

Determination of platelet aggregation inhibition during percutaneous coronary intervention with the platelet function analyzer PFA-100

Background A simple device to rapidly evaluate platelet function may aid in optimizing glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We prospectively studied platelet function in 250 patients receiving abciximab or eptifibatide during PCI. Methods and Results The platelet function analyzer PFA-100 (Dade-Behring, Deerfield, Ill) measures platelet function by determining the time to occlusion of an aperture in a biochemically active membrane as whole blood flows under high shear conditions. Platelet aggregation causes aperture occlusion, and results are reported as a closure time (CT). All patients received either abciximab or eptifibatide, along with aspirin and heparin; patients undergoing stent implantation received aspirin and a thienopyridine postprocedure. The CT was measured at baseline and 10 minutes, 4 hours, 12 hours (abciximab-only), and 24 hours after the bolus. Profound inhibition was exhibited in most patients shortly after the platelet inhibitor bolus and during the course of therapy. We observed recovery of platelet function 12 hours after discontinuation of abciximab, with a high degree of interpatient variability, and ongoing profound platelet inhibition 4 to 6 hours after the discontinuation of eptifibatide. Among patients treated with abciximab, patients who were obese recovered from platelet inhibition sooner than patients who were not obese, whereas patients who were elderly had delayed recovery compared with patients who were not elderly. Failure to achieve maximal platelet inhibition (nonclosure) at 10 minutes indicated a possible association with adverse clinical events at the 6-month follow-up examination (60% vs 20%). Conclusions PFA-100 is a rapid simple assay used as a means of assessing inhibition of platelet aggregation during PCI performed with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. Failure to achieve nonclosure early after the initiation of abciximab therapy warrants further investigation because there may be an association with adverse cardiac events at 6-month follow-up. (Am Heart J 2002;144:151-8.)     

A comparative study of light transmission aggregometry and automated bedside platelet function assays in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and receiving abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban.

Platelet inhibition is central to the efficacy of glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa antagonist therapy, but is not routinely measured during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data directly comparing the antiplatelet effects of these agents are also limited. Therefore, we compared ex vivo platelet function by standard light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and two automated bedside platelet function assays in 36 patients undergoing PCI with GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors. At baseline and 10 min following clinically recommended bolus and infusion of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg, 0.125 microg/kg/min), eptifibatide (180 microg/kg, 2 microg/kg/min), or tirofiban (10 microg/kg, 0.1 microg/kg/min), we measured 20 microM ADP- and 1.9 mg/mL collagen-induced platelet aggregation using LTA. Platelet function was also assessed using the bedside Accumetrics Ultegra-Rapid Platelet Function Assay (RPFA) and the Xylum Clot Signature Analyzer (CSA). The degree of platelet inhibition, as assessed by LTA, varied significantly between the clinically recommended doses of these GP IIb-IIIa antagonists. RPFA measurements agreed closely with LTA for abciximab, but tended to overestimate the degree of platelet inhibition for small molecules. CSA demonstrated profoundly inhibited shear-induced platelet function, but lacked sensitivity to discriminate between agents. These findings may have implications for the results of trials comparing the efficacy of these agents in patients undergoing PCI.     

Effects of Different Thrombolytic Treatment Regimen with Abciximab and Tirofiban on Platelet Aggregation and Platelet-Leukocyte Interactions: A Subgroup Analysis from the GUSTO V and FASTER Trials

Background: Due to considerably high rates of reocclusion under standard thrombolytic therapy GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been combined with thrombolytics to improve therapeutic outcomes. Potential reasons for arterial reocclusion may be increased platelet activation, interaction of platelets with other cell types such as leukocytes and inadequate drug dosing due to lack of ideal platelet monitoring. We compared combination therapy regimens consisting of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombolytics with respect to platelet inhibition and platelet-leukocyte interactions. Methods and results: From the GUSTO V trial (standard rPA vs. reduced dose rPA and abciximab) and the FASTER trial (standard TNK-tPA vs. reduced dose TNK-tPA and tirofiban) 15 patients were monitored by platelet aggregometry, rapid platelet function assay (RPFA) and flow cytometry (FC). rPA alone (n = 5) caused initial increases in platelet aggregation. However, platelet aggregation was significantly (p < 0.05) and sufficiently (>80%) inhibited by abciximab/rPA (n = 5) and tirofiban/TNK-tPA (n = 5). The platelet inhibitory effect of tirofiban/TNK-tPA was more pronounced compared to abciximab/rPA with a significant difference after 2 h (p < 0.05). Tirofiban/TNK-tPA and abciximab/rPA caused decreases in platelet-leukocyte aggregates as well as in binding of specific antibodies to the platelet vitronectin receptor and P-selectin (p < 0.05, respect.). No differences among the treatment groups were seen with respect to antibody binding to MAC-1 and CD154/CD40 ligand. Conclusions: Taken together, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors overcome the platelet activating effect of thrombolytics resulting in sufficient platelet inhibition. RPFA is a suitable monitoring tool to accurately assess platelet inhibition. Within the given combination treatment regimen tirofiban appears to be more effective compared to abciximab and to exert effects beyond the inhibition of GP IIb/IIIa.     

Platelet activation as a potential mechanism of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor-induced thrombocytopenia.

The blockade of the platelet integrin glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa has proved to be an effective antiplatelet therapy. Profound thrombocytopenia has repeatedly been described as an adverse effect in patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, but its mechanism has not been elucidated yet. With use of flow cytometry, the activation status of platelets was monitored in 26 patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction who were treated with the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab alone or in combination with the fibrinolytic agent reteplase. Fibrinogen and PAC-1 (a GP IIb/IIIa activation-specific monoclonal antibody) binding, as well as P-selectin expression on unstimulated platelets were constant in 25 patients throughout a follow-up of 7 days. In 1 patient (D.F.), the percentage of platelet-binding fibrinogen increased from 2.2% to 17.8%, for PAC-1 from 2.8% to 13.2%, and for P-selectin expression from 10.2% to 58.3% 10 minutes after the start of treatment. Furthermore, D.F. had a decrease in single platelet count in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-, citrate-, and heparin-anticoagulated and native blood. Blood films revealed platelet aggregates. In vitro testing of D.F.'s blood 2 and 4 weeks after initial admission demonstrated a reinduction of fibrinogen and PAC-1 binding to platelets, an increase of P-selectin expression, and formation of platelet aggregates following exposition of platelets to abciximab in vitro. In summary, this report describes the induction of platelet activation by a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor in vivo and reinduction in vitro in direct association with thrombocytopenia. Platelet activation by GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors may be one potential mechanism for GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor-induced thrombocytopenia.