Videolaparoscopy as rescue therapy and placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a thirty-two case single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Malfunction of the peritoneal catheter is a frequent complication in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Videolaparoscopy is a minimal invasive technique that allows rescue therapy of malfunctioning catheters and consecutive immediate resumption of PD. Furthermore, Tenckhoff catheters can be safely positioned in patients with previous abdominal surgery. We analysed the clinical diagnosis, videolaparoscopic treatment and the outcome of PD patients on whom videolaparoscopic interventions had been performed at our centre. METHODS: Thirty-two cases of videolaparoscopic interventions were performed for salvage of malfunctioning peritoneal catheters, implantation and abdominal surgical interventions in 25 PD patients. The videolaparoscope was inserted through a mini-laparotomy site of 15 mm diameter which was closed with purse-string sutures at the end of the intervention. RESULTS: Videolaparoscopy was used in 21 cases of catheter malfunction mostly due to omental wrapping (12 cases) and dislocation (five cases). In eight patients with previous surgical abdominal interventions, laparoscopic placement of the PD catheter was performed. In two cases the gall bladder was removed. One case of intestinal occlusion was evaluated laparoscopically in an attempt to minimize invasive surgery. Leakage of the peritoneal fluid presented the only complication caused by insufficient closure of one mini-laparotomy site. Minimal follow-up time of rescued catheters was 5 months. Videolaparoscopy prolonged PD catheter function by a median of 163 days (range 5-1469 days). CONCLUSIONS: Videolaparoscopy prolongs peritoneal catheter survival by treating directly the causes of malfunction. In patients with preceding abdominal interventions, the PD catheter can be placed safely even in cases necessitating surgical preparation like adhesiolysis.     

Moncrief-Popovich catheter and implantation technique: the AV fistula of peritoneal dialysis

Despite the decrease in peritonitis rate from touch contamination caused by the use of disconnect systems, technique failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD) from pericatheter and exit-site infections in PD remains unchanged. This indicates a failure of current PD catheters to prevent bacterial transfer from exit site to the peritoneal cavity. In 1991, Moncrief and Popovich introduced a new catheter design and implantation technique to address this problem. The catheter is made of silastic, has a coiled tip with 2 cuffs, and an arcuate bend between the cuffs. This would prevent catheter malfunction and leakage of PD fluid. The implantation technique involves embedding of the external segment of the catheter in the subcutaneous tunnel at insertion. The catheter segment is kept embedded for 4 to 6 weeks before externalization. This procedure will allow time for tissue ingrowth on into the external cuff and catheter surfaces between the 2 cuffs, preventing bacterial colonization of the catheter surfaces from the exit wound and thereby reducing pericatheter infections. Thus, the new technique will establish a more effective bacteriologic barrier between the exit wound and the peritoneal cavity than the conventional catheters. Ten years after validation of the catheter design and implantation technique by Moncrief and Popovich, various clinical studies confirm that this new technique of catheter implantation increases catheter life expectancy and reduces pericatheter infections in PD. Like the arteriovenous fistula of haemodialysis, this new catheter remains embedded in subcutaneous tunnel, is exteriorized electively when patient needs to be started on dialysis, and reduces pericatheter and exit-site infections in PD. The new technique, therefore, is widely accepted as a simple, safe, and cost-effective procedure for quality care of PD patients around the world.     

Salvage of problematic peritoneal dialysis catheters

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a markedly underutilized modality for permanent renal replacement therapy in the United States owing to a low rate of patient referral and high rate of patient dropout or transfer to hemodialysis. One cause for patient loss from PD is problematic PD catheters that often are removed rather than being subjected to simple surgical salvage procedures. We report three patients with problematic catheters and our approach to their management. The first patient developed erosion of the skin overlying the portion of the catheter between the deep and superficial cuffs after 6 months of PD. The second patient developed extrusion of the superficial cuff after 4 years of PD. The third patient demonstrated a localized abscess at the incision site for catheter insertion after 3 years of PD. Other than a mild superficial exit site infection and localized abscess in the second and third patient, respectively, there were no associated infections of the catheter tunnel and cuff or of the peritoneal cavity as determined by either clinical examination, ultrasound evidence of fluid collection, or cultures and white blood cell counts. All three cases were managed successfully by interventional nephrology on an outpatient basis and under local anesthesia without either catheter removal or placement of a new PD catheter. It was possible to continue uninterrupted PD in the first and third patients, while the second patient had temporary hemodialysis to allow for complete healing of the surgical wound. We conclude that in selected cases simple interventions can salvage problematic PD catheters and maintain patients on PD.     

Complications of renal dialysis access procedures

The complications of 2,179 dialysis access procedures of various types have been reviewed in an effort to determine their possible prevention and management. Scribner arteriovenous shunts or central venous catheters were preferred for temporary dialysis. Infection was a common complication of central venous catheters, but responded well to removal of the catheter. Brescia-Cimino fistulae were preferred for long-term dialysis, but were often not possible because of inadequate veins or the need for relatively urgent hemodialysis. The most useful secondary shunt was the straight forearm synthetic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft whose most common complication was thrombosis due to intimal hyperplasia at the venous anastomosis. In most cases, this complication could be corrected by patch grafting or by extension bypass. Infection was infrequent with PTFE shunts and, when localized, was sometimes successfully treated by drainage, antibiotic therapy, and topical povidone-iodine. The principal complications of long-term peritoneal dialysis were peritonitis and tunnel infection that responded to antibiotic therapy and/or removal of the catheter. Compulsive care in access insertion and meticulous management during dialysis has permitted very satisfactory long-term hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.     

Renal transplantation of patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis

A retrospective review of patients transplanted from peritoneal dialysis was performed to assess the risk of this form of dialysis for patients awaiting renal transplantation. Eighteen transplants have been performed in 16 patients, ages 6 to 57 years, undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis over the past 4 years. Sixteen were from cadaver donors, and two were from living related donors (LRD). The patients had been undergoing intermittent peritoneal dialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) using permanent silastic catheters, from five days to 4 years. No patient had clinical evidence for peritonitis at the time of transplantation. The peritoneal catheter was removed at the time of transplant in all cadaver donor recipients without complication. One recipient of a LRD kidney had the catheter removed two days prior to transplant. Cultures of the catheter were sterile in 16 cases. Two patients had positive peritoneal catheter cultures at the time of transplant but were treated with appropriate antibiotics and never developed clinical peritonitis. Fourteen transplants had postoperative fevers. No definite source was found in 13; one had fever in relation to acute graft rejection. The fevers resolved in all patients either spontaneously or subsequent to therapy. Other complications were similar to those seen in patients transplanted from hemodialysis. Hemodialysis was performed as needed pretransplant and posttransplant using a temporary femoral vein catheter or arteriovenous fistula without complication. Nine patients are alive with a functioning kidney 1 to 36 months posttransplant (mean 17 months). Six transplants rejected (five patients), and one failed secondary to renal vein thrombosis. Two patients died posttransplant, one after a cerebrovascular accident, and one due to an unknown cause 1 month postnephrectomy for rejection. In conclusion, patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis can be successfully transplanted without a significant incidence of complications related to their peritoneal dialysis.     

Feasibility of resuming peritoneal dialysis after severe peritonitis and Tenckhoff catheter removal

Published guidelines suggest that after an episode of severe peritonitis that requires Tenckhoff catheter removal, peritoneal dialysis can be resumed after a minimum of 3 wk. However, the feasibility of resuming peritoneal dialysis after Tenckhoff catheter removal remains unknown. One hundred patients were identified with peritonitis that did not respond to standard antibiotic therapy in a specific center. Their clinical course was reviewed; in all of them, Tenckhoff catheters were removed and reinsertion was attempted at least 4 wk later. In 51 patients, the Tenckhoff catheter was successfully reinserted and peritoneal dialysis was resumed (success group). In the other 49 patients, reinsertion failed and the patient was put on long-term hemodialysis (fail group). The patients were followed for 18.5 +/- 16.8 mo. The overall technique survival was 30.8% at 24 mo. In the success group, 11 patients were changed to long-term hemodialysis within 8 mo after their return to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. In the fail group, 18 of the 20 deaths occurred within 12 mo after conversion to long-term hemodialysis. After resuming peritoneal dialysis, there was a significant decline in net ultrafiltration volume (0.38 +/- 0.16 to 0.21 +/- 0.19 L; P = 0.03) and a trend of rise in dialysate-to-plasma ratios of creatinine at 4 h (0.664 +/- 0.095 to 0.725 +/- 0.095; P = 0.15). Forty-five patients (88.2%) required additional dialysis exchanges or hypertonic dialysate to compensate for the loss of solute clearance or ultrafiltration, although there was no significant change in dialysis adequacy or nutritional status. It was concluded that after an episode of severe peritonitis that required Tenckhoff catheter removal, only a small group of patients could return to peritoneal dialysis. An early assessment of peritoneal function after Tenckhoff catheter reinsertion may be valuable.     

Is surgical PD catheter insertion safe for urgent‐start peritoneal dialysis?

Urgent‐start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) is increasingly seen as a viable alternative to hemodialysis through a central venous catheter for late‐presenting end‐stage renal disease patients. However, concerns remain about starting dialysis early following the surgical implantation of the peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter; urgent PD is often thought to be a safe option only after minimally invasive percutaneous catheter insertions. Analysis of the cumulative data from published literature presented in this review appears to negate this general perception and shows that compared to the percutaneous catheter insertions, starting PD urgently following surgically placed catheter is not associated with more catheter leaks, dysfunctions, or other complications. The outcome of USPD is independent of the mode of catheter insertion. Instead, measures to minimize intra‐peritoneal pressure including using the low initial dwell volume based on patient's weight and body habitus and keeping patients in strict supine posture during exchanges in the first 2 weeks of treatment are the two most important factors ensuring a minimization of the risk of catheter‐related complications.     

Advantages of peritoneal dialysis in comparison to hemodialysis,in cardiac allograft recipients with end stage renal disease

End stage renal disease is a serious complication in heart or heart–lung transplant recipients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The majority of these patients are currently treated with hemodialysis. Since there are no randomized control trials comparing hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis in this patient population, the potential beneficial effects of peritoneal dialysis remain largely unknown. We compared the clinical outcome of such patients on peritoneal dialysis with another group on hemodialysis. Our results indicate that patients on peritoneal dialysis had fewer episodes of congestive heart failure, fluid overload and a lower overall hospitalization rate, despite having worse cardiac function than patients on hemodialysis.     

Chronic peritoneal dialysis.

Since the introduction of the permanent peritoneal catheter, interest in chronic peritoneal dialysis is increasing. The automatic peritoneal dialysis cycler and the reverse osmosis peritoneal dialysis machine have been other development that made chronic peritoneal possible. Chronic peritoneal dialysis is indicated for the children, the elderly, those without hemodialysis access sites, those living along (for home dialysis) and the diabetics, whose retinopathy seems to progress less on peritoneal dialysis than on hemodialysis. Patients awaiting a kidney transplant can be maintained equally satisfactorily on peritoneal dialysis as on hemodialysis. Because of its simplicity almost any patient can be trained for home peritoneal dialysis, and a high incidence of rehabilitation can be achieved. A flow rate of 4 1/hr with 21 exchanges, 40 hours a week, seem to the ideal dialysis requirements. Complications of chronic peritoneal dialysis include those related to the permanent catheter such as one or two way obstruction and those related the dialysis itself. The latter can be either acute (i.e. peritonitis etc.) or chornic such as neuropathy, renal osteodystrophy, anemia etc. Integrated with hemodialysis and transplantation, peritoneal provides the nephrologists with the ability to treat his patients with the most appropriate treatment.     

Simultaneous non-surgical removal and insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters for defective drainage: a bedside,day case technique

BACKGROUND: Outflow failure of peritoneal dialysis catheters is a commonly encountered problem. It may be possible to reposition the catheter by a variety of means, but this can be problematical and has variable long-term success. Commonly surgical catheter exchange is utilized, entailing inconvenience, expense and often, a reliance on temporary hemodialysis. We describe a technique allowing exchange of poorly functioning catheters with a relatively simple outpatient/day case percutaneous technique, allowing the continuation of peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: We report percutaneous exchange of 25 peritoneal dialysis catheters in 21 patients. The exchanges were performed under local anesthesia with a degree of sedation (if required). It involved the dissection down the distal cuff of the catheter and mobilization of the catheter below it. This was followed by division of the catheter, allowing passage of a guide wire into the peritoneal cavity and insertion of a further peel away sheath and insertion of a new catheter. The new catheter was tunneled out of the existing exit site after removal of the extraperitoneal portion of the old catheter by traction. RESULTS: Outflow failure was associated with fecal loading and malposition of the catheter in 14 out of the 21 patients. Exchange of catheter was successful in all the patients with good pelvic positioning of the replacement catheter in all but 1 of the cases. The mean period until the reinstitution of peritoneal dialysis was 5.1 days (range 0-14 days). Temporary hemodialysis was not required for any of the patients. One patient exhibited a small leak of peritoneal dialysis fluid after insertion, but this had spontaneously resolved within 6 days. Protracted satisfactory function of the peritoneal dialysis catheters was obtained in all but 1 of the patients (mean follow-up 51 weeks, range 11-73 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that exchange of peritoneal dialysis catheters for problems with dialysate drainage, utilizing a non-invasive percutaneous technique is both effective and safe.     

Abdominal visceral perforation by buried peritoneal dialysis catheters: Cause or coincidence?

Delayed visceral organ perforations after PD catheter insertions are extremely rare. We report two patients who presented with asymptomatic visceral perforation from their buried PD catheters. Five months after a laparoscopic buried PD catheter insertion in a 92‐year‐old man PD was initiated; bile and bowel contents were noted in the PD effluent. He subsequently expired (from pneumonia) to autopsy revealed the PD catheter within the small bowel. Despite this perforation, there was no evidence of peritonitis, inflammation, nor any bowel content within the peritoneal cavity. A second case was observed 2.5 months after an uncomplicated laparoscopic buried PD catheter insertion in a 60‐year‐old woman. PD was attempted; the patient had an immediate urge to void. MRI revealed the presence of the PD catheter within her bladder. She underwent PD catheter revision the next day with repair of bladder perforation and ultimately successfully initiated PD . Since the perforations did not occur at the time of catheter placement, we believe that the catheter eroded into a viscus, perhaps related to the lack of a fluid at the catheter ‐ viscus interface. The diagnosis of delayed visceral organ perforation following buried PD catheter insertion may be delayed because the catheter is not immediately used.     

Surgical treatment of massive hydrothorax complicating continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Acute hydrothorax is a well-recognized complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and is often regarded as a contraindication to its use. We report three cases treated by surgical closure of a communication between the peritoneal and pleural cavities enabling CAPD to continue successfully. This is a simple, safe and effective procedure which merits wider use as an alternative to transferring the patient to permanent hemodialysis.     

La réalité de la dialyse péritonéale en France : 40 ans après

The share of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the spectrum of chronic dialysis has decreased in France over the last ten years. Despite various facilities offered by the health authorities, PD remains confidential in many private units and some public hospitals. The enthusiasm present at the beginning of this technology, forty years ago, is declining, despite a real improvement in new developments, a real increase in patient survival, today at least similar to that on hemodialysis. Then, the aim of this review is first to give a summary of the principles and practice of patient and staff education and to describe the role of the medical contribution in decision-making. The second aim is to review patient and technique survival data of PD patients henceforth prolonged, and the new insights into dialysis adequacy. The presence of residual renal function is a main determinant of patient comfort together with prevention of over-hydratation. Improvement of the peritoneal catheter is underlined. The prevention and management of infections is reviewed, and also the regular assessment of peritoneal function. Free water transport is a predictor of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis, which should be assessed regularly. The physiopathology and the pathogenesis of this devastating complication allow now the prevention, and a better treatment.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II: a serious hazard in preemptive renal transplantation: a case report

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II (HIT II), is an immune-mediated complication of heparin therapy, associated with arterial and venous thrombosis. Herein we have reported a case of a 23-year-old woman who developed HIT following a living related donor, preemptive, renal transplantation. The patient was preoperatively exposed to both unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin as she underwent five hemodialysis sessions. HIT caused right common and external iliac vein and renal graft artery thrombosis, resulting in graft loss. Heparin-free hemodialysis was continued, and the patient was successfully treated with anticoagulation by the direct thrombin inhibitor lepirudin for both the thromboses and for hemodialysis. Finally, she was accepted for the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis program. This report highlighted the importance of clinical awareness as far as previous heparin exposure is concerned for establishing an early diagnosis and delivering treatment of this life-threatening prothrombotic complication of heparin administration.     

Laparoscopic omentectomy for salvage of peritoneal dialysis catheters

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Maintaining long-term peritoneal catheter function for peritoneal dialysis is commonly threatened by problems with catheter obstruction. Multiple methods have been used to salvage nonfunctioning catheters, including omentopexy, catheter repositioning, and omentectomy. We report on our experience with a laparoscopic method of omentectomy and catheter fixation for salvage of nonfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with nonfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters underwent 16 laparoscopic procedures with the intent to restore function. Clinically, all patients presented with outflow obstruction. At initial presentation, all patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and a definitive procedure. In 12 patients, catheters were enveloped by omentum, and we performed laparoscopic omentectomy and catheter fixation to the anterior pelvic wall. In one patient, we identified a broken catheter and performed a laparoscopic omentectomy at the time of catheter replacement. One 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars were utilized. Omentectomy was performed using either endo-GIA stapled resection (2 patients) or the Harmonic Scalpel (11 patients). All trocar incisions (including the 5-mm site) were closed with a suture-passing (Carter-Thomason) device to provide water-tight closure in anticipation of immediate return to peritoneal dialysis. Patients were followed postoperatively for an average of 17 months (range 4-35 months). RESULTS: All patients' catheter function was restored intraoperatively with laparoscopic omentectomy and catheter fixation. Eight catheters remained functioning following omentectomy without further intervention. Five patients (38%) experienced repeat catheter malfunction and underwent laparoscopic exploration. Of these, three catheters (60%) were restored to function with laparoscopic manipulation alone. Three catheters were found encased in extensive adhesions. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was successful in one patient and unsuccessful in one patient, who converted to hemodialysis. One patient failed laparoscopic salvage and required open laparotomy and fibrin clot removal to restore catheter function. One catheter was found to be obstructed within a pericolic hematoma. One catheter was found within residual omentum at the hepatic flexure. Both of these catheters were freed laparoscopically and continued to function at 12 and 16 months' follow-up. Complications included one episode of peritonitis, one case of postoperative ileus, and one trocar site hernia necessitating repair. The nephrologists were instructed that they could begin peritoneal dialysis on postoperative day 1. Seven patients resumed peritoneal dialysis without leak from trocar sites. The remaining patients received temporary hemodialysis through a central venous catheter and returned to peritoneal dialysis at the discretion of their nephrologists. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic omentectomy with catheter fixation is a minimally invasive means of salvaging peritoneal dialysis catheters with outflow obstruction. Complications are few, and closure of laparoscopic incisions in water-tight fashion allows rapid return to peritoneal dialysis.     

常用腹膜透析导管类型及导管相关性并发症

腹膜透析导管是腹膜透析的重要环节,导管相关性并发症约占腹膜透析转为血液透析原因的20%。不同类型导管由于结构和形状的不同,导致相关性并发症的发生率不同。双袖套较单袖套导管可更好地预防皮肤出口感染和腹膜炎;鹅颈管在预防隧道及皮肤出口感染上优于Tenckhoff直管;导管腹腔段卷曲型与直型比较,漂管及引流障碍的发生率更低。然而,随着透析技术和护理技术的提高,不同类型导管所致相关并发症的发生率均明显下降,已无明显差异。在重视导管类型选择的同时,更应强调皮肤和导管护理的重要性。     

Removal of gadolinium by peritoneal dialysis

An association between gadolinium-containing contrast and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) has been increasingly recognized. For patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) who are exposed to gadolinium, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) recommends HD to remove this contrast agent in order to minimize the risk of NSF. This study examines if gadolinium can be removed by frequent exchanges by peritoneal dialysis (PD). Following administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadodiamide to a patient with end-stage renal disease, the serum clearance of this contrast agent by automated PD was examined. 10 and 15 exchanges of PD using an automated cycler were respectively performed during the first and second 24-hour periods after gadolinium exposure. Serum gadolinium levels were measured 1 hour after the gadolinium administration, then at 24 and 48 hours after PD was initiated. 90% of the gadolinium was removed from the circulation in 2 days with a regimen of 10-15 exchanges per day of PD. For patients on chronic maintenance PD who receive gadolinium, our case suggests that a temporary intensive automated PD regimen, aimed at maximizing clearance of this contrast agent immediately after exposure, could be an effective alternative when institution of HD is problematic.     

A large pleural effusion in a patient receiving peritoneal dialysis

Hydrothorax as a complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a rare but recognized event. Proposed mechanisms for the development of a pleuro-peritoneal communication include congenital diaphragmatic defects, acquired weakening of diaphragmatic fibers caused by high intra-abdominal pressures during peritoneal dialysis, and impairments in lymphatic drainage. Pleural fluid analysis and diagnostic imaging assist in differentiation from other causes of pleural effusion. Nearly 50% of patients with this diagnosis have resolution of hydrothorax after temporary cessation of PD with interim hemodialysis for 2-6 weeks. Historically, other treatment options have included conventional pleurodesis and open thoracotomy with direct repair, producing variable results. With the advent of video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS), surgical repairs and pleurodesis are now frequently performed under direct visualization with minimal invasiveness. We report a case of hydrothorax in a patient after recent introduction to peritoneal dialysis. Pleuro-peritoneal communication was documented with thoracentesis and radionuclide scanning. VATS pleurodesis with talc was performed. Repeat scintigraphy performed 1 week after the procedure revealed no residual communication, and patient was able to resume PD without further complications.