Primary care physicians and barriers to providing care to persons with HIV/AIDS

Primary care physicians play an increasingly important role in the care of persons with HIV/AIDS due to the rising number and changing geographic distribution of persons infected with HIV/AIDS. The study explored the relationship between barriers to health services and the experience and willingness of primary care physicians to care for persons with HIV/AIDS. The study was based on a random survey of primary care physicians in South Carolina. The results indicate that although primary care physicians' willingness to treat persons with HIV/AIDS is significantly associated with many self-reported barriers (i.e., financial, structural, knowledge, and attitudinal), their HIV/AID care experience was most significantly correlated with self-reported knowledge that overrides financial and structural barriers. The results emphasize the importance of programs and policy initiatives aimed at enhancing the primary care physicians' knowledge level and improving their attitudes related to HIV/AIDS.     

Specialist physicians providing primary care services in Colorado

BACKGROUND: There is general consensus that the size of the US physician workforce now exceeds the health care needs of the American public. There is a greater proportion of specialists than primary care physicians, a specialty mix different from that of most other developed countries. METHODS: The Colorado Board of Medical Examiners sent a one-page questionnaire to all physicians licensed to practice in the state. It contained the question: "How many hours in the last week did you provide primary care services, defined as either preventive care, routine physical exams, or treatment of common ailments?" The responses of physicians who reported non-primary-care medical specialties were analyzed with respect to their personal and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Just under half (46.5%) of the 2745 specialist respondents reported having provided primary care services. As a group, however, 27.9% of specialist physicians' direct patient care time was devoted to primary care activities. The amount of primary care services being provided was greater among those not board-certified in their specialties, osteopathic physicians, and specialists spending less time in direct patient care. CONCLUSION: Additional evaluation is needed with a more comprehensive definition of primary care than used in this article, which includes important but difficult-to-measure elements, such as the integration of services, a sustained partnership with patients, and practice in the context of family and community. To the extent possible, this definition should not rely on physician self-definition of which examinations are routine and which ailments are common. However, the contribution of specialists should be considered in future primary care needs assessments, and specialists who experience low demand for their particular specialties may be especially inclined to provide primary care services.     

Will family physicians really return to obstetrics if malpractice insurance premiums decline?

BACKGROUND: The loss of family physicians as obstetrics providers during the last decade has had a significant impact on access to obstetric services, especially for rural populations. The expense of malpractice premiums has been cited often as a reason for physicians' discontinuation of this service. METHODS: Seventy-six family physicians in northern California who recently discontinued obstetrics were surveyed regarding their decisions related to obstetric practice. Those physicians who indicated that a decrease in malpractice premiums would allow them to consider resuming obstetrics were resurveyed by telephone the following year. This telephone survey occurred following a 25 percent decrease in malpractice premiums for obstetrics by the major malpractice insurance carrier for family physicians practicing obstetrics in the study area. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of the 76 physicians in the original survey who had recently discontinued obstetrics stated they would consider resuming if conditions changed. Twenty-six (90 percent) of these physicians indicated that malpractice premiums needed to change for them to consider resuming obstetrics. Following the reduction in premiums, none of these physicians reported plans to resume obstetrics or even a likelihood that they would be resuming obstetrics. CONCLUSION: This study found that family physicians who discontinued obstetrics and cited malpractice premiums as a barrier to resuming obstetrics are unlikely to resume when rates decline. This finding suggests that other issues might be equally or more important in this decision.     

Withdrawal from maternity care. A comparison of family physicians in Ontario, Canada, and the United States

To determine the relative importance of factors influencing the withdrawal of family physicians from maternity care, two studies, one done in Ontario, Canada, and the other done in the United States, were compared. The proportion of residency-trained family physicians who provide maternity care at the initiation of their careers and the proportion who have given up maternity care are nearly identical in the United States and Canada. Both studies found that about one half of the family physicians who currently provide maternity care were giving consideration to stopping. The reasons underlying this withdrawal were multifactorial. Malpractice issues were the predominant concern of United States family physicians, but the data from the studies indicate that other issues, such as interference with lifestyle and office practice and the effect of attitudes of obstetricians, should not be overlooked.     

Attitudes of professionals in providing maternity care in a primary health care system in Saudi Arabia

This study was done on a sample of the primary care centers in the Al-Baha region, Saudi Arabia to assess the opinions of the medical and paramedical staff regarding the capability and acceptability of providing antenatal and intrapartum care in the primary health care setting. The study showed that 96% of all the respondents supported the provision of antenatal care services in primary health care with 60% of them giving the reason that it is more convenient for pregnant women.90% of the respondents wanted the antenatal care to be delivered through special clinics and the majority of them wanted to give a greater role to the midwives in antenatal care. Questioned about the intranatal care provision in the centers, 98% of all the respondents agreed to the utilization of primary health care in such service. A similar percentage of them claimed to have the ability to do deliveries in the centers with existing facilities.To avoid duplication of care and to best use of available resources, low risk pregnancies should be seen antenatally and delivered in the primary health care centres provided the quality of such care is kept under control.Abdulaziz N. Al-Nasser is Assistant Professor of Primary Health Care; Mohammed A. Al-Sekait is Assistant Professor of Community Medicine; Elijah A. Bamgboye is Assistant Professor of Medical Statistics; all in the Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11472, Saudi Arabia.Wahid A. Khan is coordinator in the Primary Health Care Program, Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia.     

Educating family physicians to care for the chronically mentally ill

More than 50 percent of the chronically mentally ill receive their medical, psychiatric, and social support services from primary care physicians in the general health sector. Despite this high level of involvement with these patients, the majority of family physicians consider their training in the management of patients with mental disorders to be inadequate. This paper describes six categories of critical competencies that should be included in the mental health curricula of family physician training programs: therapeutic attitudes and skills, diagnosis and differential diagnosis, functional assessment, psychopharmacology, management of emergencies, and psychosocial treatments. It outlines the manner in which specific competencies could be incorporated in medical school, in family practice residency training, and in postgraduate continuing medical education as well as the specific elements included in each. The discussion is based on the assumption that more effective participation by family physicians in the treatment of chronic psychiatric illness requires active attention throughout the continuum of medical education.     

Reactions of salaried physicians to hospital decline.

OBJECTIVE. To examine the Exit, Loyalty, Voice, and Neglect (ELVN) reactions of full-time salaried physicians to the decline of their employing hospital, and to explore factors possibly associated with the choice of reactions. DATA SOURCE. The study analyzes data collected in a larger survey of work attitudes of 703 hospital physicians, constituting a representative national sample of (every tenth) salaried hospital physicians in Israel. DATA COLLECTION. Data were collected through a self-administered mail questionnaire with return envelopes attached. STUDY DESIGN. A survey design was used. Survey questionnaires included composite measures of the ELVN reaction as well as of the main predictors of reaction choice: job satisfaction, hospital commitment, job investment, alternatives, tenure, and managerial and senior positions. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS. The reactions of salaried physicians to hospital decline include the whole range of ELVN reactions. The choice of each reaction was found associated with a different set of disposition, situation, and position predictors. CONCLUSIONS. The ELVN typology is relevant for examining physicians' reactions to hospital decline, which appear to extend beyond the simple stay/leave dichotomy commonly used. The reactions of Exit, Loyalty, Voice, and Neglect are different in nature, and appear to reflect the different sets of circumstances that salaried physicians may face. Implications of these results for coping with hospital decline, hospital-physician relationships, and integration strategies are discussed.     

Fragmentation of patient care between chiropractors and family physicians

BACKGROUND: Most patients using alternative practitioners also receive care from physicians. It is unclear, however, how well alternative practitioners and physicians communicate and coordinate the care of shared patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe the communication and coordination of care for shared patients between chiropractors and family physicians as well as potential barriers to effectively sharing care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional national random sample survey of 400 chiropractors and 400 family physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reports on shared patients including information on adverse events, treatment, and health status. Attitudes toward perceived expertise as well as perceived liability and economic competition involved in sharing care were also assessed. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 360 (49%) of the 736 eligible practitioners, including 227 chiropractors and 133 family physicians. Although a high degree of interaction occurs between the practitioners, family physicians received information from chiropractors on 26.5% of referred patients while chiropractors received information from family physicians in 25.0% of cases (P = .73). Both groups believed that they did not receive enough information on adverse health outcomes or treatment plans for shared patients. Although neither group was particularly oriented toward wanting to share care, family physicians were much less likely than chiropractors to feel comfortable sharing care (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that care is fragmented between chiropractors and the general medical sector, with little information communicated between health care providers on issues with critical importance to quality of care. Further study is needed to identify ways to improve communication and coordination of care.