Results of retrograde open mesenteric stenting for acute thrombotic mesenteric ischemia

Objective

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is an emergent event with a high mortality rate; survivors have high rates of intestinal failure. Restoration of blood flow using endovascular or surgical revascularization is associated with better outcome in terms of survival rate and intestinal resection. Retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS), which is a hybrid technique, combines two benefits: prompt blood flow restoration with an endovascular approach and inspection and resection of the small bowel. The aim of the study was to assess the results of ROMS in thrombotic AMI in a retrospective multicenter study.

经腹小切口超声引导系膜穿刺逆向开通治疗肠系膜上动脉开口全堵病变

背景与目的：对于肠系膜上动脉（SMA）闭塞患者,尤其是存在开口处动脉粥样硬化性无残端病变,开腹逆行肠系膜动脉支架置入术（ROMS）是一种有效的治疗方法,但该手术创伤较大,一些身体条件差的患者并不适合。笔者通过报告1例SMA全堵病变病例的治疗过程介绍一种改良的微创ROMS技术,以期为临床治疗方法的选择提供参考。 方法：回顾复旦大学附属中山医院厦门医院血管外科2019年10月收治的1例SMA全堵病变患者的临床资料。患者为64岁女性,诊断为SMA闭塞引起的慢性肠系膜缺血,行杂交手术再通SMA。 结果：患者SMA开口处为无残端完全闭塞病变且无侧支血管与腹腔干动脉及脾动脉沟通,顺行或逆行血管腔内开通均无法进行。因患者全身条件较差,难以耐受开放血运重建手术和传统的ROMS。遂做腹部做小切口,超声引导下经系膜穿刺SMA远端建立通路,导丝顺利逆向通过SMA闭塞处进入降主动脉;右侧肱动脉入路导管和逆向导丝对接后顺利正向通过病变,完成球囊扩张和支架置入术。术后患者恢复良好,症状消失,3个月后随访CTA示,支架形态、位置良好,血流通畅。 结论：对于血管腔内治疗失败且全身条件较差的SMA闭塞患者,通过经腹小切口超声引导系膜穿刺逆向开通SMA是可行的。     

Endovascular treatment of celiac and mesenteric arteries stenoses: applications and results

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and assess the role of endovascular therapy in a variety of conditions related to celiac and mesenteric vascular occlusive disease.Patients and methods Our retrospective study population included 25 consecutive patients (mean age, 66 years), in whom 28 procedures were performed on 26 stenosed or occluded mesenteric vessels (superior mesenteric artery [SMA] or celiac artery [CA]). Indications included chronic mesenteric ischemia (21 patients), including 2 patients who underwent stenting prior to a planned operative repair of a juxtamesenteric AAA. Three liver transplantation patients underwent stenting of an associated CA stenosis. One patient with a splenorenal bypass underwent stenting on an associated CA stenosis. The technical and clinical success rates and the incidence of complications were determined. Follow-up parameters included maintained patency on duplex sonography and sustained clinical benefit. The need for additional interventions was noted. RESULTS: All procedures but one were technically successful (96%). Major complications occurred in three patients (one transient contrast-induced nephrotoxicity and two pseudoaneurysms). Immediate clinical success was achieved in 22 patients (88%). The three clinical failures included two patients with an excellent angiographic outcome, but with single-vessel moderate severity disease. Survival table analysis of delayed clinical outcome showed primary and primary-assisted clinical benefits at 11 months of 85% and 91%, respectively. Primary and primary-assisted stent patencies, as assessed by duplex sonography and/or angiography, at 6 months were both 92%. Angiographically documented restenosis occurred in three patients. Restenosis in two patients with CA stents was due to extrinsic compression, and it was without symptoms in one patient and was treated satisfactorily by restenting in the other patient. Restenosis in one patient with an SMA stent was successfully treated by restenting. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests a potential role for endovascular therapy of celiac and mesenteric arterial occlusive disease in a variety of clinical scenarios, with a low incidence of complications and a high technical success rate.     

Technique of hybrid retrograde superior mesenteric artery stent placement for acute-on-chronic mesenteric ischemia

Revascularization for acute mesenteric ischemia can be challenging in patients with bowel gangrene, peritoneal contamination, and no good source of inflow for a bypass graft. A 70-year-old female patient presented with acute-on-chronic mesenteric ischemia, flush superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion, and diffuse aorto-iliac occlusive disease. This study describes the technique of hybrid retrograde SMA recanalization and stent placement using a midline laparotomy is described. The mid-portion of the SMA was exposed and jejunal branches were controlled with silastic vessel loop. Retrograde access was established under direct vision and the occluded SMA segment was crossed, pre-dilated, and stented using a balloon-expandable stent. The SMA was flushed through a longitudinal arteriotomy, which was closed using a saphenous vein patch. Retrograde hybrid SMA stenting is an expeditious option to revascularize patients with acute on chronic mesenteric ischemia who have peritoneal contamination and no other good source of inflow to the mesenteric arteries.     

Splenic artery-to-superior mesenteric artery bypass for chronic mesenteric ischemia--a case report

Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is a serious vascular condition that if left untreated may progress to acute ischemia resulting in bowel necrosis and high surgical morbidity/mortality rates. Elective intervention has been shown to prevent this progression and relieve symptoms. Current open surgical intervention involves arterial bypass using a vein or synthetic graft conduit with the inflow originating from the aorta or iliac artery. In some circumstances, the splenic artery provides an additional treatment option for revascularization of the superior mesenteric artery. In certain cases, the splenic artery has several advantages over traditional surgical options. The splenic artery is an arterial conduit much like the internal mammary artery used in coronary artery bypass grafting. These grafts are known for their long-term patency and in selected clinical circumstances are preferred over venous grafts. Because the splenic artery has a natural inflow, only a single vascular anastomosis at the outflow vessel (the SMA) is necessary. This lessens the risk of anastomotic stenosis by decreasing the number of anastomoses created and it makes the procedure shorter in duration. The fact that the inflow is provided by the splenic artery makes cross-clamping of the aorta unnecessary, thereby lessening the risk of producing cardiac ischemia and declamping hypotension. A disadvantage is the risk of splenic ischemia with the possible need for splenectomy. The majority of individuals will have adequate collateral supply to the spleen via the short gastric arteries. The risk to the patient of splenectomy versus the benefits of a less complicated arterial reconstruction with avoidance of aortic cross-clamping must be weighed on a case-by-case basis. Preventing the progression to acute mesenteric ischemia with its increased mortality by timely restoration of adequate vascular supply is an important principle in treating patients with CMI. Controversy still exists over the best treatment option for these patients, whether it be antegrade versus retrograde bypass, single-vessel versus multivessel reconstruction, or open surgical repair versus endovascular intervention. In selected patients, the use of the splenic artery can be considered as an additional option for arterial reconstruction of the SMA.     

Jejunal arterial access for retrograde mesenteric stenting

Endovascular approaches have replaced open surgical revascularization in most patients with mesenteric ischemia; however, flush ostial occlusions may not be amenable to traditional antegrade access. Retrograde mesenteric stenting has been previously described, but this technique requires a formal laparotomy and dissection of the proximal superior mesenteric artery. We present here a modification of this technique that requires only a “mini-laparotomy” and no open vascular repair of the superior mesenteric artery as well as a review of our initial institutional experience with this procedure. Our approach differs from previously described work by minimizing mesenteric dissection, avoiding the need for repair of an arteriotomy, and limiting the size of the laparotomy incision in this population of profoundly comorbid patients.     

Outcomes of antegrade and retrograde open mesenteric bypass for acute mesenteric ischemia

Background

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a challenging clinical problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Few contemporary reports focus specifically on patients undergoing open mesenteric bypass (OMB) or delineate outcome differences based on bypass configuration. This is notable, because there is a subset of patients who are poor candidates for endovascular intervention including those with flush mesenteric vessel occlusion, long segment occlusive disease, and a thrombosed mesenteric stent and/or bypass. This analysis reviewed our experience with OMB in the treatment of AMI and compared outcomes between patients undergoing either antegrade or retrograde bypass.

Pediatric splanchnic arterial occlusive disease: clinical relevance and operative treatment

OBJECTIVE: Splanchnic arterial occlusive disease is rare in childhood. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical relevance and operative treatment of these lesions in a unique experience from a single institution. METHODS: Seventeen children (11 boys and 6 girls) from 2 years to 17 years in age with critical narrowings of the celiac artery (CA) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) underwent treatment at the University of Michigan from 1974 to 2000. Etiologic factors included embryologic fusion abnormalities of the fetal aortae during formation of the splanchnic arteries (n = 15), inflammatory aortoarteritis (n = 1), and radiation-induced arterial fibrosis (n = 1). Individual lesions included CA occlusions (n = 6) and stenoses (n = 7), SMA occlusions (n = 3) and stenoses (n = 11), and inferior mesenteric artery stenosis (n = 1). Fourteen children had abdominal aortic coarctations, and 15 had renal artery stenoses. Two patients had postprandial abdominal discomfort and food aversion, consistent with intestinal angina. Small stature affected five others, perhaps attributable to severe renovascular hypertension and failure to thrive. Ten children underwent intestinal revascularization, at the time of an aortoplasty or thoracoabdominal bypass for aortic coarctation (n = 7) or at the time of renal artery revascularization (n = 8). Primary splanchnic revascularization procedures included SMA-aortic implantation (n = 3), aorto-SMA and CA bypass with an internal iliac artery graft (n = 3) or a saphenous vein graft (n = 1), CA-aortic implantation at a stenotic SMA origin (n = 2), and CA and SMA intimectomy (n = 1). Secondary operations included SMA-aortic implantation (n = 2). RESULTS: All 10 children who underwent splanchnic revascularization have thrived, gained weight, and are free of abdominal pain, with follow-up periods averaging 9 years. No intestinal ischemic manifestations occurred in the seven children who did not undergo operation. CONCLUSION: Pediatric splanchnic arterial occlusive disease is a rare illness appropriately treated with operation in properly selected children.     

Staged acute mesenteric and peripheral ischemia treatment in COVID-19 patient: Case report

IntroductionCOVID-19 is an infectious disease that has been associated not only with respiratory complications. The COVID-19 disease includes, also damage to other organ systems as well as coagulopathy. The present report describes a case of COVID-19 presenting with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) and subsequent acute limb ischemia (ALI).Presentation of caseAn 84-years old hospitalized female patient presenting diabetes and recent COVID-19 reported acute onset of abdominal pain and typical findings of AMI. The CT-angiography confirmed the AMI secondary to a superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion. The patient was managed through an endovascular approach using a SMA mechanical thrombectomy and stenting with a good result.DiscussionTreatment of this life-threatening condition includes surgical resection of the necrotic bowel, restoration of blood flow to the ischemic intestine and supportive measure - gastrointestinal decompression, fluid resuscitation, hemodynamic support. Endovascular management of AMI is preferred over the standard surgical approach due to a reduced mortality and morbidity rates. Imaging findings of intestinal necrosis, however, represent an indication for AMI surgical treatment with explorative laparotomy. Different endovascular solutions have been employed to address AMI including mechanical thrombectomy, local thrombolysis, and PTA-stenting.ConclusionCOVID-19 clinical presentation can be atypical, including gastrointestinal symptoms. If a first embolic event occurs, an aggressive anticoagulation treatment could be inefficient to reduce the risk of subsequent embolization events. The limited life expectancy of such revascularization procedures should orientate towards less invasive treatments.     

Comparison of superficial femoral vein and saphenous vein as conduits for mesenteric arterial bypass

PURPOSE: Gangrenous bowel, intraabdominal sepsis, and previous failed mesenteric bypass are indications for use of an autogenous conduit for mesenteric arterial reconstruction. Saphenous vein (SV) is often used as the autogenous conduit of choice, but it may be prone to graft stenosis or occlusion. Recent experience with superficial femoral vein (SFV) suggests that it is an excellent alternative conduit for major arterial reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of SV and SFV for mesenteric arterial bypass. METHODS: During a 7-year period, 26 patients underwent 43 mesenteric arterial bypass procedures with autogenous conduit. SV was used for 23 bypasses (53%), and SFV was used for 20 bypasses (47%). Indications for revascularization included chronic mesenteric ischemia (n = 15; 58%), acute mesenteric ischemia (n = 9; 35%), and mycotic aneurysm of the paravisceral aorta (n = 2; 7%). Three patients (11%) underwent revascularization with SV grafts and two patients (8%) with SFV grafts after previous failed mesenteric bypass. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 15%. Three deaths occurred after SV bypass for acute mesenteric ischemia, and one death occurred after a SFV bypass for a ruptured paravisceral mycotic aneurysm. Twenty-two surviving patients were followed for a mean of 31 +/- 6 months. Three of 11 patients (27%) who survived after SV bypass had recurrent mesenteric ischemia develop (acute, n = 1; chronic, n = 2) from graft thrombosis at a mean interval of 32 +/- 22 months after surgery. No patient had recurrent symptoms develop after SFV bypass. One of the three patients with SV graft failure died of acute mesenteric ischemia, and the other two patients underwent successful bypass with SFV. Symptomatic graft failure was significantly more likely to occur in patients receiving SV grafts compared with SFV grafts (P <.05). CONCLUSION: SFV yields acceptable clinical outcomes for mesenteric arterial bypass compared with SV. SFV is a viable alternative to SV when autogenous conduit is indicated for mesenteric arterial reconstruction.     

Isolated inferior mesenteric artery revascularization for chronic visceral ischemia.

PURPOSE: Complete visceral artery revascularization is recommended for the treatment of chronic visceral ischemia. However, in rare cases, it may not be possible to revascularize either the celiac or superior mesenteric (SMA) arteries. We have managed a series of patients with isolated revascularization of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and now report our experience gained over a period of three decades. METHODS: Records were reviewed from 11 patients with chronic visceral ischemia who underwent isolated IMA revascularization (n = 8) or who, because of failure of concomitant celiac or SMA repairs, were functionally left with an isolated IMA revascularization (n = 3). All the patients had symptomatic chronic visceral ischemia documented with arteriography. Five patients had recurrent visceral ischemia after failed visceral revascularization, and two patients had undergone resection of ischemic bowel. The celiac or the SMA was unsuitable for revascularization in five cases, and extensive adhesions precluded safe exposure of the celiac or the SMA in five cases. IMA revascularization techniques included: bypass grafting (n = 4), transaortic endarterectomy (n = 4), reimplantation (n = 2), and patch angioplasty (n = 1). RESULTS: There was one perioperative death, and the remaining 10 patients had cured or improved conditions at discharge. One IMA repair thrombosed acutely but was successfully revascularized at reoperation. The median follow-up period was 6 years (range, 1 month to 13 years). Two patients had recurrent symptoms develop despite patent IMA repairs and required subsequent visceral revascularization; interruption of collateral circulation by prior bowel resection may have contributed to recurrence in both patients. Objective follow-up examination with arteriography or duplex scanning was available for eight patients at least 1 year after IMA revascularization, and all underwent patent IMA repairs. There were no late deaths as a result of bowel infarction. CONCLUSION: Isolated IMA revascularization may be useful when revascularization of other major visceral arteries cannot be performed and a well-developed, intact IMA collateral circulation is present. In this select subset of patients with chronic visceral ischemia, isolated IMA revascularization can achieve relief of symptoms and may be a lifesaving procedure.     

Open surgery for atherosclerotic chronic mesenteric ischemia

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to document the results of our current practice of open mesenteric revascularization to enable comparison with the recent trend of percutaneous endovascular therapy for the treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia. METHODS: Patients were identified via operation code data as well ongoing audit data from 1992 until 2006. Only patients with a history of chronic mesenteric ischemia secondary to atherosclerosis for 3 months or longer were included in the study. Follow-up data have been collected prospectively and include clinical examination and history, as well as graft surveillance consisting of mesenteric duplex ultrasonography, computed tomography, and/or angiography every 6 months for 3 years and then yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients underwent 41 open revascularization procedures for chronic mesenteric ischemia, comprising 67 bypass grafts. The mean patient age was 65 years (range, 45-85 years), and 44% (n = 17) were male. Symptoms were present on average for 11 months (range, 4-48 months) before treatment. The average weight loss was 11.4 kg, and three patients (7.6%) also had evidence of ischemic enteritis. There was one perioperative death, thus giving a perioperative mortality rate of 2.5%. Perioperative morbidity occurred in five patients (12.2%). Primary graft patency was 92% at 5 years. Seven patients died during follow-up, which ranged from 4 to 161 months (mean, 39 months)-one (2.5%) from mesenteric ischemia. Two (5%) other patients have had recurrent mesenteric ischemic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical mesenteric revascularization by bypass grafting for atherosclerotic-induced chronic mesenteric ischemia can be performed with low mortality and morbidity and provides excellent long-term primary patency rates and symptom-free outcomes. Pending more data on the acute and long-term results of endovascular techniques, open mesenteric revascularization remains the gold standard for most patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia.     

The Surgical Treatment of Chronic Intestinal Ischemia: Results of a recent series

Due to the rarity of the condition, large and prospective series defining the optimal method of digestive arteries revascularization, for the treatment of chronic intestinal ischemia, are lacking. The aim of this consecutive sample clinical study was to test the hypotesis that flexible application of different revascularization methods, according to individual cases, will yield the best results in the management of chronic intestinal ischemia.

Eleven patients, of a mean age of 56 years, underwent revascularization of 11 digestive arteries for symptomatic chronic mesenteric occlusive disease. Eleven superior mesenteric arteries and one celiac axis were revascularized. The revascularization techniques included retrograde bypass grafting in 7 cases, antegrade bypass grafting in 2, percutaneous arterial angioplasty in 1, and arterial reimplantation in one case. The donor axis for either reimplantation or bypass grafting was the infrarenal aorta in 4 cases, an infrarenal Dacron graft in 4, and the celiac aorta in one case. Grafting materials included 5 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and 3 Dacron grafts. Concomitant procedures included 3 aorto-ilio-femoral grafts and one renal artery revascularization. Mean follow-up duration was 31 months.

There was no operative mortality. Cumulative survival rate was 88,9% at 36 months (SE 12,1%). Primary patency rate was 90% at 36 months (SE 11,6%). The symptom free rate was 90% at 36 months (SE 11.6%). Direct reimplantation, antegrade and retrograde bypass grafting, all allow good mid-term results: the choice of the optimal method depends on the anatomic and general patient’s status. Associated infrarenal and renal arterial lesions can be safely treated in the same time of digestive revascularization. Angioplasty alone yields poor results and should be limited to patients at poor risk for surgery.     

The surgical treatment of chronic intestinal ischemia: results of a recent series

Due to the rarity of the condition, large and prospective series defining the optimal method of digestive arteries revascularization, for the treatment of chronic intestinal ischemia, are lacking. The aim of this consecutive sample clinical study was to test the hypothesis that flexible application of different revascularization methods, according to individual cases, will yield the best results in the management of chronic intestinal ischemia. Eleven patients, of a mean age of 56 years, underwent revascularization of 11 digestive arteries for symptomatic chronic mesenteric occlusive disease. Eleven superior mesenteric arteries and one celiac axis were revascularized. The revascularization techniques included retrograde bypass grafting in 7 cases, antegrade bypass grafting in 2, percutaneous arterial angioplasty in 1, and arterial reimplantation in one case. The donor axis for either reimplantation or bypass grafting was the infrarenal aorta in 4 cases, an infrarenal Dacron graft in 4, and the celiac aorta in one case. Grafting materials included 5 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and 3 Dacron grafts. Concomitant procedures included 3 aorto-ilio-femoral grafts and one renal artery revascularization. Mean follow-up duration was 31 months. There was no operative mortality. Cumulative survival rate was 88.9% at 36 months (SE 12.1%). Primary patency rate was 90% at 36 months (SE 11.6%). The symptom free rate was 90% at 36 months (SE 11.6%). Direct reimplantation, antegrade and retrograde bypass grafting, all allow good mid-term results: the choice of the optimal method depends on the anatomic and general patient's status. Associated infrarenal and renal arterial lesions can be safely treated in the same time of digestive revascularization. Angioplasty alone yields poor results and should be limited to patients at poor risk for surgery.     

Surgical treatment of chronic mesenteric arterial insufficiency

The treatment of 41 patients with chronic mesenteric insufficiency is reviewed: 20 men and 21 women with a mean age of 59 years were treated and observed for an average of 42 months. Thirty-one patients had symptoms of intestinal angina whereas 10 patients underwent prophylactic revascularization during other aortic operations. All but one patient had revascularization of the superior mesenteric artery, alone or in combination with another revascularization. Various surgical techniques were used, including retrograde bypass in 24 patients, antegrade bypass in 11 patients, and endarterectomy in the remaining six patients. Seven patients had acute abdominal symptoms and required emergency operation while in the hospital awaiting elective revascularization. There were two deaths in the perioperative period (4.9%), both caused by bowel necrosis. Six patients are known to have had late revascularization failure, resulting in recurrent symptoms in three patients and two subsequent deaths. All patients who remained asymptomatic after late graft failure had undergone multiple vessel revascularization; no patient revascularized prophylactically had symptoms of intestinal angina during the follow-up period. Early mesenteric revascularization is a safe and effective method of relieving the symptoms of chronic visceral ischemia and may prevent the development of fatal bowel necrosis.     

多排螺旋CT肠系膜血管造影诊断急性肠缺血

目的 探讨多排螺旋CT肠系膜血管造影(MDCTA)在急性肠缺血(AMI)中的应用价值.方法 对43例经临床或手术、病理证实的AMI患者行全腹MDCT平扫、动脉期和门脉期扫描,准直为0.6mm,采用容积重建(VR)、最大密度投影(MIP)及薄层最大密度投影(TSMIP)技术进行肠系膜动脉和静脉成像,重点观察肠系膜血管的异常表现、肠道和肠系膜异常征象.结果 导致AMI的原因为:肠系膜上动脉(SMA)栓塞4例,SMA血栓形成6例,肠系膜上静脉(SMV)血栓形成13例,SMA夹层5例,绞窄性肠梗阻10例,血管炎5例.MDCTA可清晰地显示AMI的血管异常,如血管堵塞、狭窄或夹层的部位、形态、程度和范围;显示血管走向的异常,如聚拢、推移、扭曲或扭转等;并显示侧支血管.MDCTA可明确AMI的原因,如粥样硬化斑块、栓子、血栓形成、夹层、肿瘤血管侵犯、绞窄性肠梗阻和血管炎等.结论 MDCTA能很好地显示AMI的直接征象,结合间接征象可在病变早期诊断AMI并明确病因.     

Acute mesenteric ischemia: improved results--a retrospective analysis of ninety-two patients

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a curable disease if diagnosis and therapy are instituted before irreversible changes have occurred. AMI has been diagnosed with increasing frequency, during the last two decades, yet the mortality rate remains as high as 80% to 95%. Ninety-two patients with AMI were treated at Hadassah University Hospital between 1952 and 1987. Seventy-seven patients were treated surgically: 15 underwent only explorative laparotomy, and 62 underwent bowel resection or revascularization or both. The latter patients were divided into two groups: 17 patients treated surgically between 1952 and 1976, in whom bowel resection and primary anastomosis was the only surgical procedure carried out (group 1), and 45 patients treated in the last decade (group 2), in whom one or more of the following procedures were performed: bowel resection with primary anastomosis (n = 16), revascularization (n = 16), "second-look" (n = 18), and delayed anastomosis (n = 10). The overall mortality rate in 62 surgically treated patients was 40% (82% in group 1 and 24% in group 2) and 21% in 29 patients treated in a combined surgical approach. The reasons for improved results in group 2 patients are discussed, and an algorithm for surgical treatment of patients with AMI of different causes is proposed.     

Contemporary management of acute mesenteric ischemia: Factors associated with survival

PURPOSE: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a morbid condition with a difficult diagnosis and a high rate of complications, which is associated with a high mortality rate. For the evaluation of the results of current management and the examination of factors associated with survival, we reviewed our experience. METHODS: The clinical data of all the patients who underwent operation for AMI between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 1999, were retrospectively reviewed, clinical outcome was recorded, and factors associated with survival rate were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (22 men and 36 women; mean age, 67 years; age range, 35 to 96 years) underwent study. The cause of AMI was embolism in 16 patients (28%), thrombosis in 37 patients (64%), and nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NMI) in five patients (8.6%). Abdominal pain was the most frequent presenting symptom (95%). Twenty-five patients (43%) had previous symptoms of chronic mesenteric ischemia. All the patients underwent abdominal exploration, preceded with arteriography in 47 (81%) and with endovascular treatment in eight. Open mesenteric revascularization was performed in 43 patients (bypass grafting, n = 22; thromboembolectomy, n = 19; patch angioplasty, n = 11; endarterectomy, n = 5; reimplantation, n = 2). Thirty-one patients (53%) needed bowel resection at the first operation. Twenty-three patients underwent second-look procedures, 11 patients underwent bowel resections (repeat resection, n = 9), and three patients underwent exploration only. The 30-day mortality rate was 32%. The rate was 31% in patients with embolism, 32% in patients with thrombosis, and 80% in patients with NMI. Multiorgan failure (n = 18 patients) was the most frequent cause of death. The cumulative survival rates at 90 days, at 1 year, and at 3 years were 59%, 43%, and 32%, respectively, which was lower than the rate of a Midwestern white control population (P <.001). Six of the 16 late deaths (38%) occurred because of complications of mesenteric ischemia. Age less than 60 years (P <.003) and bowel resection (P =.03) were associated with improved survival rates. CONCLUSION: The contemporary management of AMI with revascularization with open surgical techniques, resection of nonviable bowel, and liberal use of second-look procedures results in the early survival of two thirds of the patients with embolism and thrombosis. Older patients, those who did not undergo bowel resection, and those with NMI have the highest mortality rates. The long-term survival rate remains dismal. Timely revascularization in patients who are symptomatic with chronic mesenteric ischemia should be considered to decrease the high mortality rate of AMI.     

Endovascular repair of chronic mesenteric occlusive disease: the role of duplex surveillance

BACKGROUND: Chronic occlusive mesenteric ischaemia can be treated surgically or endovascularly. Endovascular techniques as elsewhere in the vascular tree are limited by restenosis. The aim of this study was to determine if duplex ultrasound proven restenosis correlates with recurrence of symptoms. METHODS: Our study looks at successful percutaneous revascularization of the mesenteric circulation associated proven restenosis using colour Doppler ultrasound and the relation to recrudescence of symptoms or weight loss. A retrospective review of five patients treated endovascularly at our institution for mesenteric angina secondary to visceral artery stenosis was carried out. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in four out of the five patients in our study. One patient had a procedure complicated by thrombus in the coeliac axis and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stents, subsequently showed SMA occlusion and 90% stenosis of the CA and inferior mesenteric artery and required an aorto-mesenteric graft. Three of the four patients with a technically successful procedure had significant (>70%) restenosis of the SMA. All three, including one patient with both SMA restenosis and chronic inferior mesenteric artery occlusion, remain asymptomatic and have maintained their postprocedural weight gain. CONCLUSION: Although ultrasound is a convenient, non-invasive tool for follow up of endovascular treatment of mesenteric stenosis, its use is unclear as in our study restenosis did not correlate with recrudescence of symptoms.     

Clinical implications for the management of acute thromboembolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery: autopsy findings in 213 patients

OBJECTIVE: To study findings at autopsy in patients with fatal acute thromboembolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Acute occlusion of the SMA is difficult to diagnose and mortality remains high. In Malmo, Sweden, the autopsy rate between 1970 and 1982 was 87%, creating possibilities for a population-based study. METHODS: Among 23,496 clinical autopsies and 7569 forensic autopsies, 213 cases with acute thromboembolic occlusion of the SMA and intestinal infarction were identified. RESULTS: A clinical suspicion of intestinal infarction was documented in 32% of the patients, only 35% being in the care of surgeons. The embolus/thrombus ratio was 1.4 to 1. Thrombotic occlusions were located more proximally than embolic occlusions (P < 0.001), intestinal infarction was more extensive (P = 0.025) and thrombotic occlusions were associated with old brain infarction (P = 0.048), aortic wall thrombosis (P = 0.080), and disseminated cancer (P = 0.079). Patients with embolic occlusions (n = 122) had a higher frequency of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than patients with thrombotic occlusions (P = 0.049). The embolic source was identified in 80%. In 115 (94%), synchronous embolism and/or source of embolus were present. There were findings of remaining cardiac thrombi in 58 (48%) and synchronous emboli affected 273 other arterial segments in 83 (68%). CONCLUSIONS: Early recognition and revascularization would have been a prerequisite for survival in at least half of the patients, since the jejunum, ileum, and colon were affected by infarction. A minority of all patients were under surgical care. AMI, cardiac thrombi, and synchronous emboli were common findings among patients with embolic occlusions.