The Effects of Manual Therapy Using Joint Mobilization and Flexion-distraction Techniques on Chronic Low Back Pain and Disc Heights

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of manual therapy using joint mobilization and flexion-distraction techniques on chronic low back pain and disc heights. [Subjects] This study was conducted with 31 chronic low back pain patients who were divided into a manual therapy group (MTG; n=16) and a spinal decompression therapy group (SDTG; n=15). [Methods] The MTG was treated using joint mobilization techniques and flexion-distraction techniques, and the SDTG was treated using spinal decompression therapeutic apparatuses. Conservative physical therapy was used in both groups, and the therapy was implemented three times per week for 6 weeks. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure patient’s low back pain scores, and a picture archiving and communication system was used to measure disc height by comparing and analyzing the images. [Results] In comparisons of the VAS within each of the two groups, both the MTG and the SDTG showed significant decreases. In comparisons of disc height within each of the two groups, the MTG showed statistically significant increases. [Conclusion] Manual therapy using joint mobilization techniques and flexion-distraction techniques is considered an effective intervention for addressing low back pain and disc heights in patients with chronic low back pain.Key words: Manual therapy, Joint mobilization techniques, Spinal decompression therapy     

Effects of flexion-distraction manipulation therapy on pain and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

[Purpose] This study examined the effects of flexion-distraction manipulation therapy on pain and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. [Subjects] Thirty patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were divided into two groups: a conservative treatment group (n=15) and a flexion-distraction manipulation group (n=15). [Methods] The conservative treatment group received conservative physical therapy, and the flexion-distraction group received both conservative physical therapy and flexion-distraction manipulation therapy. Both groups received treatment 3 times a week for 6 weeks. The Visual Analog Scale was used to measure pain intensity, and the Oswestry Disability Index was used to evaluate the level of disability caused by the pain. [Results] The Visual Analog Scale scores for pain were significantly decreased in both groups. In the between-group comparison, the decrease in pain was more significant in the flexion-distraction group. According to the Oswestry Disability Index, the level of disability was significantly decreased in both groups, but the decrease was more significant in the flexion-distraction group. [Conclusion] Flexion-distraction manipulation appears to be an effective intervention for pain and disability among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.Key words: Spinal stenosis, Flexion-distraction manipulation, Disability     

融合联合非融合固定治疗腰椎退行性病

目的探讨融合联合非融合固定联合治疗腰椎退行性病的临床疗效。方法选取我院2006年5月～2011年12月作者采用融合联合非融合固定治疗腰椎间蕊突出症患者42例及腰椎滑脱合并椎间盘突出症30例。术后患者获得平均19（6--50）个月的随访,采用视觉模拟评分法（VAS）及腰椎功能障碍指数（ODI）评定患者手术后的治疗疗效。结果本组患者术后均无感染、神经根损伤、脑脊液漏等并发症发生。VAS及ODI评定结果显示患者术后VAS及ODI分值改善优于术前,手术前后比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。结论融合联合非融合固定治疗腰椎退行性病减压效果明显、固定可靠,有效减缓了相邻椎间盘退变,是治疗腰椎退行性病的一种有效方法。     

经皮髓核旋切术联合选择性脊神经根阻滞术治疗腰椎间盘突出症

目的:观察经皮Decompressor髓核旋切术联合选择性脊神经根阻滞术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效和安全性。方法:选择60例包容性腰椎间盘突出症患者,随机分为A组30例,B组30例,分别应用国产康嘉公司生产的Decompressor髓核旋切器,在斜位X-线的引导下,经上关节突外缘穿刺入路,行髓核旋切腰椎间盘减压术。B组减压后联合应用选择性脊神经根阻滞术。用治疗前和治疗后三天、三个月VAS评分、直腿抬高试验及治疗优良率来评价临床疗效。结果:术后3天、2周、2月腰痛和腿痛评分、Oswestry评分B组均明显低于A组。亚组腿痛评分比较,术后3天、2周,B1组和B2组均明显低于A2组。结论:经皮Decompressor髓核旋切术联合选择性脊神经根阻滞术能快速而有效达到椎间盘减压并对神经根进行抗炎治疗,具有操作简便、损伤小、安全性高、疗效好。     

Effects of Spinal Stabilization Exercise on the Cross-sectional Areas of the Lumbar Multifidus and Psoas Major Muscles,Pain Intensity,and Lumbar Muscle Strength of Patients with Degenerative Disc Disease

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of using spinal stabilizing exercise to reduce atrophy of the multifidus and psoas major muscles, reduce the levels of pain and disability, and increase paraspinal muscle strength in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD). [Subjects and Methods] In 33 patients (Age range: 25–65 years) diagnosed with DDD, spinal stabilization exercise was conducted for 8 weeks. The levels of pain and disability were measured before and after exercise using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Paraspinal muscular strength in four directions was evaluated with a CENTAUR 3D Spatial Rotation Device. Cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of both the left and right multifidus and the psoas major at the upper endplate of L4 were measured before and after exercise using computed tomography (CT). [Results] After 8 weeks of spinal stabilization exercise, the pain and lumbar disability in subjects decreased significantly from 6.12±1.24 to 2.43±1.14. The ODI score also improved from 20.18±7.14 to 8.81±5.73. In addition, paraspinal muscle strength increased significantly, while the CSAs of the left and right multifidus and psoas major widened as compared with the pre-exercise size. [Conclusion] Spinal stabilization exercise was effective for reducing pain and disability in DDD patients. It was an effective adjunct to aid rehabilitation in these cases.Key words: Degenerative disc disease, Spinal stabilization, Multifidus     

抗癫痫药物治疗神经病理性疼痛的对照研究

目的:通过对腰椎间盘突出症患者硬膜外注射糖皮质激素疗效的回顾性分析,探讨硬膜外注射对腰椎间盘突出症的短期和中远期疗效。方法:收集我院2008年~2009年62例腰椎间盘突出症并伴有下肢疼痛患者行硬膜外注射糖皮质激素的临床资料。完整随访44例,进行治疗后1天、1月和6月疗效随访调查,并行疗效评价分析。结果:硬膜外注射糖皮质激素后1天、1月视觉模拟评分(visual ananlogue scale,VAS)及Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)与治疗前相比显著性降低(P<0.05),患者治疗后6个月VAS及ODI与治疗前相比无显著性差异(P>0.05)。VAS和ODI治疗后6个月与治疗后1个月相比,显著升高。结论:硬膜外注射糖皮质激素对椎间盘突出症有较好的短期(治疗后1天和1月)临床疗效,中长期(治疗后6月)疗效欠佳,建议与其他微创治疗方法联合使用。     

The effects of stabilization exercise with an oral assistive device on pain and functionality of low back pain patients

[Purpose] This study examined low back pain patients’ decrease in pain and improvement in functionality after performance of a lumbar stabilization exercise using an oral assistive device, which can replace a lumbar assistive device. [Subjects and Methods] The experimental group (n=12) conducted a stabilization exercise using an oral assistive device after conventional physical therapy. The control group (n=12) received conventional physical therapy. In order to objectively measure pain in this study, a visual analogue scale (VAS) was used. In order to evaluate the subjects’ functional aspects while living with low back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used. [Results] There were statistically significant improvements in the comparison of the VAS and ODI of the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group’s VAS and ODI significantly improved after the intervention compared to the control group. [Conclusion] The stabilization exercise using the assistive device after conventional physical therapy in the rehabilitation of low back pain patients reduced subjects’ pain and increased their functional activities.Key words: Pain, LBP, Stabilization exercise     

The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain,disability, and depression of chronic low back pain patients

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, and depression of chronic low back pain patients. [Subjects] In this study, 30 chronic low back pain patients were divided into an extracorporeal shock wave therapy group (ESWTG, n=15) and a conservative physical therapy group (CPTG, n=15). [Methods] The ESWTG received extracorporeal shock wave therapy and the CPTG received general conservative physical therapy two times per week for six weeks. Pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS), the degree of disability of the patients was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and their degree of depression was measured using the Beck depression index (BDI). [Results] In intra-group comparisons, ESWTG and CPTG showed significant decreases in VAS, ODI, and BDI scores. Intergroup comparisons revealed that these decreases in VAS, ODI, and BDI scores were significantly larger in ESWTG than in CPTG. [Conclusion] Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is an effective intervention for the treatment of pain, disability, and depression in chronic low back pain patients.Key words: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy, Pain, Depression     

Long‐Term Results of Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression mild® for Spinal Stenosis

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) generally occurs from a combination of degenerative changes occurring in the lumbar spine. These include hypertrophy of ligamentum flavum, facet joint arthritic changes and bulging of the intervertebral disk. Spinal stenosis leads to compression of the lumbar neural elements (cauda equina), which manifests as low back and leg pain especially on standing and walking known as “neurogenic claudication.” Current treatment options for LSS are varied. Conservative management, including physical therapy with/without epidural steroid injections, may be adequate for mild stenosis. Surgical decompression is reserved for severe cases and results in variable degrees of success. Patients with moderate‐to‐severe LSS having ligamentum flavum hypertrophy as a key contributor are generally inappropriately treated or undertreated. This is due to ineffectiveness of conservative therapy and possibility that major surgical compression might be too aggressive. Percutaneous decompression offers a possible solution for this patient population. Methods: One‐year follow‐up study was conducted at 11 U.S. sites. Study cohort included 58 mild^® percutaneous decompression patients who underwent 170 procedures, the majority treated bilaterally at one or two lumbar levels. Outcome measures included the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), and SF‐12v2^® Health Survey. Results: No major mild^® device or procedure‐related complications were reported. One‐year data showed significant reduction of pain as measured by VAS. Improvement in physical functionality, mobility, and disability was significant as measured by ZCQ, SF‐12v2, and ODI. Conclusions: At 1 year this 58‐patient cohort demonstrated continued excellent safety profile of the mild^® procedure and equally important, showed long‐term pain relief and improved functionality.     

Dynesys与Wallis系统治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症的长期疗效及安全性

目的探讨单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者应用椎弓根螺钉Dynesys系统、棘突间Wallis系统治疗的有效性及安全性。方法 60例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为2组,Dynesys组30例采用椎弓根螺钉Dynesys系统治疗,Wallis组30例采用棘突间Wallis系统治疗。记录2组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间。随访8年,记录术前及术后1、3、12个月腰、腿痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale, VAS);比较术前及术后1、3、5、8年日本骨科协会(Japanese Orthopaedic Association, JOA)评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry Disability Index, ODI);比较术前及术后4、8年手术节段及邻近节段椎间活动度(range of motion, ROM)、椎间隙高度;统计随访期间腰椎间盘突出症复发、棘突骨折以及内固定失败等并发症发生情况。结果 Dynesys组手术时间、住院时间较Wallis组长,术中出血量较Wallis组多(P<0.05)。2组术后1、3、12个月腰痛、腿痛VAS评分均较术前降低(P<0.05),2组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组术后1、3、5、8年ODI均较术前降低,JOA评分较术前增高(P<0.05);2组术后4、8年手术节段ROM均较术前降低(P<0.05),椎间隙高度与术前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后4、8年邻近节段椎间隙高度、ROM与术前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);以上数据2组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Dynesys组1例术后8年邻近节段发生退变,无任何临床症状;Wallis组1例术后6年腰椎间盘突出症复发,行后路融合内固定术后症状缓解,末次随访时未见复发。结论 Dynesys与Wallis系统治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症均可维持手术节段椎间隙高度,保留手术节段一定的活动度,对邻近节段影响较小。     

基于子午流注纳子法的耳穴贴压对腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛的疗效观察

摘要 目的：观察基于子午流注纳子法的耳穴贴压对腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法：选取2019年1月~2019年12月收治的60例腰椎间盘突出症患者,采用随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组,各30例。对照组实施常规耳穴贴压,试验组实施基于子午流注纳子法的耳穴贴压。比较2组视觉模拟量表（VAS）疼痛评分,日本骨科协会（JOA）下腰痛评分,临床疗效,腰椎功能障碍指数（ODI）评分及不良反应。结果：2组护理后的VAS评分和ODI评分均低于护理前,且护理后的试验组VAS评分和ODI评分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）;2组护理后的JOA评分均高于护理前,且护理后的试验组JOA评分高于对照组（P＜0.05）;2组临床疗效差异有统计学意义,且试验组总有效率更高（P＜0.05）;2组均无不良反应。结论：基于子午流注纳子法的耳穴贴压可减轻腰椎间盘突出疼痛,增强疗效,改善腰椎功能并且安全。     

神经松动术结合推拿治疗腰椎间盘突出症

目的:观察神经松动术结合传统腰椎推拿对腰椎间盘突出症的治疗效果。方法:腰椎间盘突出症患者50例,随机分为2组各25例,均进行传统腰椎推拿手法治疗,观察组配合神经松动术治疗。治疗前后采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、直腿抬高(straight leg raise,SLR)及JOA评分评定2组疗效。结果:治疗4周后,2组VAS评分均较治疗前明显下降,且观察组更低于对照组(均P<0.01);SLR和JOA评分均较治疗前明显提高,且观察组显著高于对照组(均P<0.05)。结论:神经松动术结合传统腰椎推拿手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症效果较好,明显优于单一腰椎推拿手法治疗。     

麦肯基疗法联合腰部核心肌力训练治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察

目的:观察麦肯基疗法联合腰部核心肌力训练治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的临床疗效。方法:80例LDH患者随机分为对照组与观察组各40例,2组患者均给予常规康复治疗,包括牵引、超短波治疗等;观察组增加麦肯基疗法与腰部核心肌力训练,均接受4周治疗,并分别于治疗前后选用Oswestry下腰背功能障碍指数(ODI)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及临床疗效进行评定。结果:治疗4周后,2组患者ODI及VAS评分较治疗前均有降低(P<0.05),且观察组较对照组评分更低(P<0.05);治疗后2组临床疗效比较,观察组总有效率明显优于对照组(92.50%,77.50%,P<0.05)。结论:麦肯基疗法联合腰部核心肌力训练治疗腰椎间盘突出症有更好的疗效,治疗周期短且见效快,值得临床推广应用。     

Effect of joint mobilization using KEOMT and PNF on a patient with CLBP and a lumbar transitional vertebra: a case study

[Purpose] The purpose of this case study was to identify the effects of joint mobilization using Kaltenborn-Evjenth orthopedic manual therapy (KEOMT) and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) techniques on a patient with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and a lumbar transitional vertebra. [Methods] The intervention methods were joint mobilization using KEOMT and PNF techniques. The program consisted of 40-min sessions 3 days a week for 4 weeks. The spinal motion (thoracic and lumbar vertebrae), pain, and thickness of the multifidus were measured. [Results] The angle of spinal curvature increased, and the range of motions (ROMs) flexion and extension increased in the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. The pain score as measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) score decreased. The thickness of the multifidus (L4) increased on the left and right sides. [Conclusion] These results suggest that joint mobilization using KEOMT and PNF techniques had a positive effect on the spinal motion, pain, and thickness of the multifidus of a patient with chronic low back pain and a lumbar transitional vertebra.Key words: Lumbar transitional vertebra, Joint mobilization, Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation     

Comparative Evaluation of Oxygen‐Ozone Therapy and Combined Use of Oxygen‐Ozone Therapy with Percutaneous Intradiscal Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Aim: To compare the efficacy of oxygen‐ozone therapy and the combined use of oxygen‐ozone therapy with percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation (PIRFT) for the treatment of contained lumbar disc herniation. Methods: Ninety‐one adult patients with low back pain secondary to contained lumbar disc herniation were randomly assigned into two groups. Ozone group received intradiscal oxygen‐ozone therapy (4 to 7 mL of oxygen ozone mixture); ozone‐PIRFT group received a combination of oxygen‐ozone therapy with PIRFT (radiofrequency lesioning at 80°C for 360 s). Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measures included a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). Secondary outcome measures included pain relief, reduction of analgesic consumption, and patient's satisfaction. Clinical assessment of these outcome measures was performed at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure. Results: VAS scores and ODI were significantly decreased by both ozone and ozone‐PIRFT when compared with the baseline values at all points of follow‐up; however, ozone‐PIRFT produced a significant reduction in the VAS scores and ODI when compared to ozone at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year follow‐up. Ozone‐PIRFT also resulted in a significant change in all secondary measures at all points of follow‐up, as compared with the ozone group. Conclusion: Ozone‐PIRFT is more efficacious than ozone alone in reducing pain scores, analgesic consumption, improving functional outcome, and satisfaction of patients with contained lumbar disc herniation.     

体位及康复运动疗法在颈腰椎间盘患者中的应用

目的探讨体位及康复运动疗法在颈腰椎间盘患者中的应用价值。方法选取140例颈腰椎间盘患者随机分为观察组和对照组各70例,对照组采用针灸、药物及牵引为主的常规对症治疗,观察组在此基础上采用规律的体位及康复运动疗法,评价2组临床疗效、颈腰椎疼痛程度、腰椎功能及颈腰椎活动度。结果观察组临床总有效率为87.14%,高于对照组的72.86%(P0.05);治疗前,2组视觉模拟疼痛(VAS)评分、腰椎功能障碍指数(ODI)评分差异无统计学意义(P0.05),治疗后,2组评分均显著降低,且观察组VAS评分、ODI评分低于对照组(P0.05);治疗前,2组颈椎前屈、后伸活动度和腰椎屈伸、旋转活动度差异无统计学意义(P0.05),治疗后,2组均显著改善,且观察组颈椎前屈、后伸活动度和腰椎屈伸、旋转活动度均高于对照组(P0.05)。结论体位及康复运动疗法辅助对症治疗颈腰椎间盘患者疗效满意,对缓解疼痛和改善颈腰椎活动度有重要的临床价值。     

自制自攻环锯在可视化椎间孔镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的应用价值

目的:探讨用自制自攻环锯行可视下椎间孔扩大成形术在椎间孔镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的价值。方法:选择2016年1月至2018年12月使用椎间孔镜技术治疗腰4/5、腰5/骶1椎间盘突出症患者64例,其中术中使用普通环锯与自制自攻环锯行椎间孔扩大成形术各32例。分别记录患者椎间孔扩大成形时间、术中透视次数、住院天数、术后相关并发症;对比术前、术后1 d、术后6个月患者的腰腿痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)与Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI);术后6个月采用改良Macnab法进行疗效评价。结果:自制环锯组椎间孔扩大成形时间、手术时间、术中透视次数少于普通环锯组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者住院天数差异无统计学意义。两组患者术中均无腹腔脏器与大血管破裂发生,无复发。普通环锯组、自制环锯组组内患者腰腿疼痛术前VAS与术后1 d、术后6个月评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术前ODI评分与术后1 d、术后6个月评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);普通环锯组与自制环锯组患者组间各时间点VAS、ODI评分差异无统计学意义。普通环锯组术后6个月疗效优良率与自制环锯组患者差异无统计学意义[93.8%(30/32)vs 96.9%(31/32)]。结论:自制自攻环锯在可视下椎间孔镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的应用安全有效,具有置管步骤简便、直视下进行椎间孔扩大成形、透视次数少的优点。     

Effects of Thoracic Mobilization and Manipulation on Function and Mental State in Chronic Lower Back Pain

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in function and mental state after thoracic mobilization and manipulation in patients with chronic lower back pain (LBP). [Subjects and Methods] Thirty-six subjects were randomly divided into mobilization group (group A), manipulation group (group B) and control group (group C). The Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to measure the functional impairment of patients with LBP. A multiple spinal diagnosis was used to measure the range of motion (ROM) of vertebra segments. The Fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) was used to investigate the mental state of LBP patients. [Results] Group A and group B were significantly different from group C in terms of the ODI. Between groups, there was no difference in ROM during trunk flexion. Group A and group B were also significantly different from the control group in extension ROM. The FABQ of group B was significantly different from that of group A. [Conclusion] Application of mobilization or manipulation to thoracic lumbar vertebrae has a positive effect on function, mental state, and ROM in patients with lower back pain.Key words: LBP, Mobilization, Manipulation     

The Effects of VR-based Wii Fit Yoga on Physical Function in Middle-aged Female LBP Patients

[Purpose] The purpose of this research was to determine the effects of a virtual reality-based yoga program on middle-aged female low back pain patients. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty middle-aged female patients who suffered from low back pain were assigned to either a physical therapy program or a virtual reality-based yoga program for a period of four weeks. Participants could check their posture and weight bearing on a monitor as they shifted their weight or changed their postures on a Wii balance board. There were a total of seven exercise programs. A 30-minute, three times per week, virtual reality-based Wii Fit yoga program or trunk stabilizing exercise was performed, respectively. [Results] Repeated-measures analysis of covariance revealed significant differences in between pre- and post-training VAS, algometer, Oswestry low-back pain disability index (ODI), Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), and fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FBQ) scores. The VAS, algometer, ODI, RMDQ, and FBQ scores showed significant differences in groups. Regarding the effect of time-by-group interaction, there were significant differences in VAS, ODI, ODI, and FBQ scores. [Conclusion] In conclusion, for middle-aged female patients who have low back pain, a virtual reality-based yoga program was shown to have positive effects on physical improvements, and this program can be employed as a therapeutic medium for prevention and cure of low back pain.Key words: Low back pain, Virtual reality, Yoga     

靶向椎间孔成形减压术治疗游离型腰椎间盘突出合并神经根管狭窄症

目的探讨经皮椎间孔镜下行靶向椎间孔成形减压术治疗游离型腰椎间盘突出合并神经根管狭窄症的临床疗效。方法选取2016年10月-2017年12月赤峰市医院脊柱外科收治的30例游离型腰椎间盘突出合并神经根管狭窄症患者。所有患者均在经皮椎间孔镜下行靶向椎间孔成形减压术。记录术前1 d、术后2 d及术后3个月患者腰痛与腿痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI),术后2 d及术后3个月采用改良Macnab标准评估手术疗效。结果所有患者均顺利完成治疗,手术时间为65~200 min,平均90 min。术中出血量为15~135 ml,平均55 ml。卧床时间均不超过24 h,平均住院日为5 d。术前1 d腰痛及腿痛VAS评分为(6.57±1.96)和(7.03±1.75)分,术后第2天腰痛及腿痛VAS评分为(2.03±0.96)和(1.97±1.07)分,术后3个月腰痛及腿痛VAS评分为(1.83±0.95)和(1.77±1.04)分,术前1 d、术后2 d及术后3个月ODI指数分别为(70.42±3.55)%、(22.56±0.72)%和(22.69±0.70)%。可以看出术后3个月和术后2 d较术前1 d各项指标均有改善,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。应用改良Macnab标准评定疗效,在临床疗效上,术后3个月患者的优良率为96.67%。明显优于术后2 d的优良率73.33%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。结论经皮椎间孔镜下靶向椎间孔成形减压术是治疗游离型腰椎间盘突出合并神经根管狭窄症的微创、有效、安全的手术方式之一。