Treatment of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures with an ulna hook plate

IntroductionFractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal bone present one of the commonest fractures of the metatarsal bones. Conventionally intramedullary screws and tension band wiring have been used as internal fixation methods. Lately hook plates have also served as an alternative fixation method. We hereby report on our experience with the hook plate used in treating fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal.Methods21 patients treated with the hook plate for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures were assessed clinically and radiologically.ResultsAverage time to union in primarily treated fractures (n = 18) was 7.7 weeks (range 4.5-16 weeks). Average time to return of activities of daily living (ADLs) was 10.3 weeks (range 4.5-37 weeks). The average AOFAS midfoot score was 30.4 preoperatively and 95.2 postoperatively (p < 0.01).ConclusionThe ulna hook plate presents a suitable and adequate method of osteosynthesis used to primarily treat proximal fifth metatarsal fractures requiring surgical intervention with satisfactory post-operative outcomes.     

Iatrogenic fracture gapping during fixation of Jones fractures: Anatomic and mechanical considerations in a cadaveric model

BackgroundSurgical fixation of Jones fractures is often recommended to facilitate recovery and achieve union. Iatrogenic fracture displacement during intramedullary screw fixation is a commonly encountered technical issue. This may be related to fracture location in relation to the surrounding ligamentous attachments, namely the robust intermetatarsal ligaments found at the proximal articulation of the 4th and 5th metatarsals. This study examines the relationship between fracture line and its location in regards to the surrounding ligamentous structures and its effect on Jones fracture displacement, reduction and fixation in a cadaveric model.MethodsEighteen fresh-frozen cadaveric feet were dissected with preservation of all ligamentous attachments. Given the similar anatomic distal extent of the dorsal and plantar intermetatarsal ligaments on the 5th metatarsal, measurements were obtained detailing the anatomic position of the dorsal intermetatarsal ligament (DIL) only. The specimens were divided into two groups with modelled fractures created at the 4th & 5th metatarsal articulation proximal to the distal extent of the DIL (Group 1) or just distal to the DIL (Group 2). Fractures were fixed in standard fashion with serial fluoroscopic images obtained to study fracture gapping and rotation.ResultsThere was approximately 5 mm of fracture gapping created iatrogenically during tapping with no statistically significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 (4.53 mm versus 5.25 mm, p = 0.5430). The distal aspect of the DIL was anatomically located 2.77 mm (Range 1.58 mm–4.46 mm) distal to the 4th & 5th metatarsal articulation.ConclusionsConsiderable iatrogenic fracture gapping occurs during intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures in a cadaveric model regardless of fracture location in relation to the intermetatarsal ligamentous attachments. Specific techniques may be required to maintain anatomic alignment during tapping and screw fixation to prevent iatrogenic displacement.Level of evidenceV, Expert Opinion.     

Variations in the insertion of peroneus longus tendon—A cadaver study

BackgroundThe insertion of peroneus longus is traditionally described to the plantar surface of the 1st cuneiform and 1st metatarsal. It is thought to be the main contributor to the plantarflexed first ray seen in cavus feet.MethodsWe studied the insertion of peroneus longus in 26 feet from 14 adult cadavers. The insertional points, presence of sesamoid bone and variations in insertion were noted.ResultsThe main insertion was to the base of the 1st metatarsal and the medial cuneiform in the majority of feet but variations were observed. A sesamoid bone was present within the tendon under the cuboid in 16 feet, 12 of which had additional lateral insertion bands.ConclusionsVariations in the insertion of peroneus longus were found and we have described two new lateral bands.     

LCP distal ulna hook plate as alternative fixation for fifth metatarsal base fracture

Intramedullary screw fixation is the most common treatment for fifth metatarsal base fractures. Screw application does not achieve accurate reduction in fracture with small fragments, osteoporotic bone, or Lawrence zone 1 fractures, however. On the basis of similar anatomical architectures between the distal ulna and the fifth metatarsal base, the purpose of this study was to assess the results of a locking compression plate (LCP) distal ulna hook plate in stabilizing displaced zone 1 or 2 fifth metatarsal base fractures. Nineteen patients with Lawrence zone 1 (n = 12) or 2 (n = 7) fractures of the fifth metatarsal base were treated surgically with an LCP distal ulna hook plate. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically, and functional outcomes were graded by using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scoring system. Radiographic bony union was obtained in all patients, at an average of 7.4 weeks. The mean AOFAS midfoot score improved from 26 (range, 0–45) preoperatively to 94 (range, 72–100) points at the final follow-up. There were three patients with post-traumatic cubometatarsal arthrosis and one patient with sural nerve neuropraxia. In our experience, the distal ulna hook plate achieves a high rate of bony consolidation and anatomically suitable fixation in zone 1 or 2 fifth metatarsal base fractures. We also suggest that the LCP distal ulna hook plate should be considered as an alternative treatment in multifragmentary, osteoporotic, and tuberosity avulsion (zone 1) fifth metatarsal base fractures.     

Short term clinical and patient reported outcomes following Virtual Fracture Clinic management of fifth metatarsal fractures

IntroductionFracture clinics are experiencing increased referrals and decreased capacity. Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) are an efficient, safe, and cost-effective solution for specified injury presentations. There is currently a lack of evidence to support the use of a VFC model in the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures. This study aims to assess clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures in VFC. We hypothesise that it is both safe and cost effectiveness.MethodsPatients presenting to VFC at our major trauma centre with a 5th metatarsal base fracture, between January 2019 and December 2019, were included. Patient demographics, clinic appointments, complication and operative rates were analysed. Patients received standardised VFC treatment; walker boot/full weight bearing, rehabilitation information and instructions to contact VFC if symptoms of pain persist after 4 months. Minimum follow-up was one year; Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaires (MOXFQ) were distributed. A basic cost analysis was performed.Results126 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 41.6 years (18–92). Average time from ED attendance to VFC review was 2 days (1 – 5). Fractures were classified according to the Lawrence and Botte Classification with 104 (82%) zone 1 fractures, 15 (12%) zone 2 fractures and 7 (6%) zone 3 fractures. At VFC, 125/126 were discharged. 12 patients (9.5%) arranged further follow-up after initial discharge; pain the reason in all cases. There was 1 non-union during the study period. Average MOXFQ score post 1 year was 0.4/64, with only 11 patients scoring more than 0. In total, 248 face-to-face clinic visits were saved.ConclusionOur experience demonstrates that the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures in the VFC setting, with a well-defined protocol, can prove safe, efficient, cost effective and yield good short term clinical outcomes.     

Factors influencing treatment recommendations for base of 5th metatarsal fractures in orthopaedic residency programs

BackgroundManagement of proximal 5th metatarsal fractures remains a controversial topic in orthopaedic surgery. Both operative and non-operative approaches have been described in the clinical setting. This confusion has led to non-standardized treatment recommendations for proximal 5th metatarsal fractures. This study was designed to analyze concordance rate of treatment recommendations between orthopaedic trainees and orthopaedic foot and ankle experts.MethodsAn online survey containing 14 cases of proximal 5th metatarsal fractures were distributed to 92 orthopaedic residents in two ACGME-accredited programs. Relevant weight-bearing radiographs, patient’s age and gender were provided, and two questions regarding treatment recommendations were surveyed. Resident’s recommended treatment was then matched against ultimate treatment by orthopaedic foot and ankle experts. ANOVA and T-test are used for associations between the rate of concordant treatment with PGY and trainee foot and ankle experience. Fleiss’ kappa was used to assess the inter-observer agreement.ResultsSeventy-two residents returned the survey. The overall concordance rate was 43.98% with no correlation between agreement rate and PGY-years. No difference in agreement rate was observed between residents who had completed their foot and ankle rotation versus those who had not. There was a slight inter-observer agreement in recommending treatment among all residents (κ = 0.117, 95% CI: 0.071–0.184).ConclusionsOur data demonstrated no significant concordance between resident level in training regarding proximal 5th metatarsal fracture treatment decisions, nor between residents and subspecialty-trained foot and ankle surgeons. Increased rotations with foot and ankle fellowship-trained surgeons throughout residency may be desirable to improve the quality of residency training.Level of Evidence: III.     

Torsional strains in the proximal fifth metatarsal: implications for Jones and stress fracture management

BACKGROUND: Reports of nonunion of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures treated by internal fixation indicate that current fixation methods do not always adequately address the stresses to which the bone is subjected during ambulation. In particular, the insertion sites of the peroneus brevis and peroneus tertius tendons on the fifth metatarsal suggest that their actions can impose torsional stresses on the areas of the bone in which Jones fractures and stress fractures occur. Intramedullary screw fixation, however, offers little resistance to rotation of the proximal and distal fragments relative to one another. METHODS: To determine the potential for the existence of torsional stresses in the fifth metatarsal during post-operative ambulation, a simplified cadaver model of single-limb stance was used in which cadaver feet were subjected to concurrent axial and tendon forces while monitoring the outputs of stacked rosette strain gauges placed at the typical sites of Jones and stress fractures. Principal strain and shear strain magnitudes and directions were measured. RESULTS: The shear strain magnitudes and strain axis directions indicated the presence of torsional stresses in the underlying bone potentially capable of causing internal rotation of the proximal fragment relative to the distal end of the bone. CONCLUSIONS: This finding has implications for the treatment of both Jones fractures and stress fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. An internal fixation device that has the capability to resist torsion as well as tension and bending would appear optimal to treat these fractures.     

Anatomical study of Lapidus arthrodesis using two different plantar plate systems

BackgroundFirst tarsometatarsal arthrodesis (modified Lapidus procedure) constitutes a sufficient treatment for moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity and first ray instability. The plantar plate arthrodesis was shown to provide superior mechanical stability and less postoperative complications than screw fixation or dorsal plating. Nevertheless, the in-brought hardware may cause irritation of the tibialis anterior or peroneus longus tendon requiring explantation of the material in some cases.The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of tendon irritation after plantar first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis in a cadaver study.MethodsPlantar plate arthrodesis was performed as in real surgery on twelve pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric feet. Two different plate systems were randomly allocated to each pair of feet. After plate fixation careful dissection of the feet followed to analyze potential tendon irritation and to determine a “safe zone” for plantar plate placement.ResultsA “safe zone” between the insertion sties of tibialis anterior and peroneus longus tendon was found and proven to be sufficiently exposed using a standard medio-plantar approach. Both plates were fixed in this zone without compromising central tendon parts. Peripheral tendon parts were irritated in 42% using Darco Plantar Lapidus Plating System® (Wright Medical, Memphis, TN) and in 8% using the Plantar Lapidus Plate® (Arthrex, Naples, FL). Bending of the anatomically preshaped plates is often necessary to ensure optimal fit on the bone surface.ConclusionsModified Lapidus procedure with plantar plating of the first tarsometatarsal joint can be performed safely without compromising central tendon parts via standard medio-plantar approach.Level of clinical evidence5, Cadaver Study.     

Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between non-operative and operative treatment in 5th metatarsal base fractures (Zone 1)

The treatment of Zone 1 fractures of the 5th metatarsal base with >2 mm of displacement remains controversial. We prospectively analyzed 29 patients with 5th metatarsal base fractures (Zone 1) during 2009–2014. Radiography was performed to assess the degree of fracture gap and metatarsal length. Patients with gaps of 2 mm or less were treated conservatively using a short leg cast or splint (Group A), while patients with fracture gap >2 mm were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group B patients were managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and Group C patients were placed in a short leg cast only. Visual analog scale (VAS) score and American orthopedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) score were obtained at the initial consult and at the last follow-up after treatment; change of the 5th metatarsal length was also measured at the initial consult and after complete bony union. Our study demonstrated that radiographic union of all cases was observed with a significant decrease in VAS and AOFAS scores, regardless of the initial fracture gap and type of management. Additionally, there was no difference seen in final VAS scores for patients with longer metatarsals when compared to those in whom the metatarsals were unchanged or shortened.     

Insertional anatomy of peroneal brevis and longus tendon — A cadaveric study

BackgroundPeroneal Tendon (PT) complex is formed by the Peroneus Longus Tendon (PLT) and Peroneus Brevis Tendon (PBT), their synovial sheath, the superior and inferior retinaculum, and the Os Peroneum (OP). Their insertion is associated with some anatomic variability. Knowing these variants helps to understand the PT pathology and it may support the decision-making concerning the operative approach. The purpose of this study was to assess anatomical variability in PT insertion.MethodsTwenty fresh-frozen cadaveric feet were used. The lateral part of the ankle, foot and sole were dissected to expose PLT and PBT course and distal insertions.ResultsConcerning the PBT, eleven feet had a normal insertion in the base of the fifth metatarsal; the other nine had a variability. Regarding the PLT, thirteen out of twenty had the normal insertion in the first metatarsal; the remaining seven had anatomical variants.ConclusionsIn this study, we found a great variability in the insertional anatomy of PBT and PLT.Clinical relevanceIt is important that orthopedic surgeons are aware of the great variability of PT anatomical insertion when performing foot and ankle surgery, in order to avoid possible complications, for instance a PLT injury during preparation of tarso-metatarsal arthrodeses.     

Can we safely place the distal volar locking plate screws into the subchondral zone of a distal radius fracture using a 45° supination oblique view under fluoroscopic guidance?

IntroductionCareful distal locking screw insertion into the subchondral zone is necessary to obtain proper mechanical strength of unstable distal radius fractures using volar locking plating. However, subchondral zone screw insertion increases the risk of intra-articular screw penetration, which may remain unrecognized during surgery due to complex distal radial anatomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of fluoroscopic guidance with a 45° supination oblique view technique for placing distal screws into the subchondral zone during volar locking plating for unstable distal radius fractures and to explore the factors associated with poor screw placement.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 171 wrists of 169 patients treated with variable-angle volar locking plates for unstable radius fractures. The subchondral zone was defined as the metaphyseal area within 4 mm of the articular margin of the distal radius. The location of the distal locking screws and radiographic parameters, including the teardrop angle, were measured using computed tomography scans and X-rays. Clinical and radiographic factors were examined to determine their possible associations with screw placement failure.ResultsOf 581 distal screws inserted, 559 screws (96.2%) were inserted into the subchondral zone and 17 screws into the metaphyseal zone (2.9%). Five screws (0.7%) in three wrists showed intra-articular placement: four screws were placed into the lunate fossa and one into the scaphoid fossa. These three wrists also exhibited significantly reduced teardrop angles. The distal screws were significantly closer to the joint line in the lunate fossa than the scaphoid fossa (1.9 ± 0.9 mm vs. 2.8 ± 1 mm, P < 0.000).ConclusionThe 45° supination oblique view technique is a useful fluoroscopic guiding technique for accurate and safe distal screw placement in the subchondral zone in volar locking plate fixation for distal radial fractures. However, a decreased teardrop angle or extended lunate fossa should be corrected before distal screw insertion to avoid intra-articular screw placement.     

Calcar screw position in proximal humerus fracture fixation: Don’t miss high!

IntroductionIn locked plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures, the calcar is an important anchor point for screws providing much-needed medial column support. Most locking plate implants utilize a fixed-trajectory locking screw to achieve this goal. Consequently, adjustments of plate location to account for patient-specific anatomy may result in a screw position outside of the calcar. To date, little is known about the consequences of “missing” the calcar during plate positioning. This study sought to characterize the biomechanics associated with proximal and distal placement of locking plates in a two-part fracture model.Materials and methodsThis experiment was performed twice, first with elderly cadaveric specimens and again with osteoporotic sawbones. Two-part fractures were simulated and specimens were divided to represent proximal, neutral, and distal plate placements. Non-destructive torsional and axial compression tests were performed prior to an axial fatigue test and a ramp to failure. Torsional stiffness, axial stiffness, humeral head displacement and stiffness during fatigue testing, and ultimate load were compared between groups.ResultsCadavers: Proximal implant placement led to trends of decreased mechanical properties, but there were no significant differences found between groups. Sawbones: Distal placement increased torsional stiffness in both directions (p = 0.003, p = 0.034) and axial stiffness (p = 0.018) when compared to proximal placement. Distal placement also increased torsional stiffness in external rotation (p = 0.020), increased axial stiffness (p = 0.024), decreased humeral head displacement during fatigue testing, and increased stiffness during fatigue testing when compared to neutral placement.DiscussionThe distal and neutral groups had similar mechanical properties in many cadaveric comparisons while the proximal group trended towards decreased construct stiffness.Resultsfrom the Sawbones model were more definitive and provided further evidence that proximal calcar screw placements are undesirable and distal implant placement may provide improved construct stability.ConclusionSuccessful proximal humerus fracture reconstruction is inherent upon anatomic fracture reduction coupled with medial column support. Results from this experiment suggest that missing the calcar proximally is deleterious to fixation strength, while it is safe, and perhaps even desirable, to aim slightly distal to the intended target.     

Locking Compression Plate Distal Ulna Hook Plate as Alternative Fixation for Fifth Metatarsal Base Fracture

Intramedullary screw fixation has been the most common treatment for fifth metatarsal base fractures. However, screw application will not achieve accurate reduction in fractures with small fragments, osteoporotic bone, or Lawrence zone 1 fractures. Because of the similar anatomic architecture between the distal ulna and the fifth metatarsal base, the purpose of the present study was to assess the results of a locking compression plate distal ulna hook plate in stabilizing displaced zone 1 or 2 fifth metatarsal base fractures. A total of 19 patients with Lawrence zone 1 (n = 12) or 2 (n = 7) fractures of the fifth metatarsal base were treated surgically with a locking compression plate distal ulna hook plate. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically, and the functional outcomes were graded using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot scoring system. Radiographic bony union was obtained in all patients, at an average of 7.4 weeks. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot score improved from 26 (range 0 to 45) points preoperatively to 94 (range 72 to 100) points at the final follow-up visit. Three patients developed post-traumatic cubometatarsal arthrosis, and 1 patient developed sural nerve neurapraxia. In our experience, the distal ulna hook plate achieved a high rate of bony consolidation and anatomically suitable fixation in zone 1 or 2 fifth metatarsal base fractures. We suggest that the locking compression plate distal ulna hook plate should be considered as an alternative treatment of multifragmentary, osteoporotic, and tuberosity avulsion (zone 1) fifth metatarsal base fractures.     

Safe zone of pin insertion for nonbridging external fixators in distal radial fractures: MRI analysis

BackgroundOf the anatomical reduction and fixation methods used to treat distal radius fracture, non-bridging external fixation has the advantage of enabling early wrist motion. The surgical technique relies on successful placement of the pin in individual fracture fragments. The present study aimed to identify the safe zone of pin insertion for a non-bridging external fixator into the distal radius that avoids metal impingement of extensor tendons.MethodsThe width and length of the septal attachments of the extensor retinaculum were measured on axial MR images of 62 wrists.ResultsThe 2–3 septum was the widest and longest, with a width of 2–7 mm and a location 0–36 mm proximal to the wrist joint. The width of the 1–2 septum was 2–6 mm, and was widest at 10 mm proximal to the joint. The 1–2 septum was triangular-shaped, while the 2–3 septum was oval-shaped. The 3–4 and 4–5 septa had narrow attachments and were adequate for pin insertion (with a pin 1–2 mm in width) at a position less than 8 mm proximal to the wrist. The width of the 1 R septum (radial to the 1st septum) was 2–6 mm at the radiovolar aspect of the wrist.ConclusionsThere were two safe pin insertion sites; the first was safe at the distal aspect only (8–10 mm proximal to the wrist) and included the 1–2, 3–4, and 4–5 septa, while the second was safe from 0 mm to 32–38 mm proximal to the wrist and included the 1 R and the 2–3 septa. The 1 R septum had adequate size for use as a new pin insertion site that aligns in the internervous plane and has minimal risk of superficial radial nerve injury.     

Safe corridor for fibular transfixation wire in relation to common peroneal nerve: A cadaveric analysis

BackgroundPeroneal nerve impalement is a recognized complication of percutaneous placement of fibular transfixation wires by palpatory method after increase use of ilizarov technique in treatment of Tibial fractures, deformity correction and limb lengthening. The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between the Common Peroneal Nerve (CPN) and the palpable landmark, fibular head for insertion of proximal fibular transfixation wire, safe zones in proximal tibia and percentage of fibula where nerve crosses the neck.MethodsStandard 1.8-mm Ilizarov k- wires were inserted in the fibula head of fresh 10 un-embalmed cadaveric knees. Wires were inserted percutaneously to the fibula head by palpatory technique. The course of common peroneal nerve was dissected. Distances from wire entry point to the course of the common peroneal nerve were measured post-wire insertion.ResultsThe mean distance of the common peroneal nerve from the anterior aspect of the broadest point of the fibular head was 25.10 ± 4.39 mm (range 16–35 mm). Common peroneal nerve was seen to cross the neck of fibula at a mean distance of 32.3 ± 8.53 mm (range 20–50 mm). Wire placement was found to be on average, 46% of the maximal AP diameter of the fibula head and 44% of the distance from tip of fibula to the point of nerve crossing fibula neck.ConclusionWe recommend Proximal fibula transfixation wires are safer to pass with in 2 cm from the tip of the styloid process of the fibula, Anterior half of the head of fibula, <8% of total fibular length, Ventral half of the anterior compartment to avoid injury to peroneal fan. The palpable landmark of fibula is a misinterpretation; it is just the prominent subcutaneous portion of fibula and not the styloid process of fibula which on dissection was located much posterior. Better to take fluoroscopic guidance in difficult cases where palpation of head of fibula is difficult.     

A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones

Background:The incidence of fractures in the trochanteric area has risen with the increasing numbers of elderly people with osteoporosis. Although dynamic hip screw fixation is the gold standard for the treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures, treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures still remains controversial. Intramedullary devices such as Gamma nail or proximal femoral nail and proximal anatomic femur plates are in use for the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. There are still many investigations to find the optimal implant to treat these fractures with minimum complications. For this reason, we aimed to perform a biomechanical comparison of the proximal femoral nail and the locking proximal anatomic femoral plate in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.Result:Nail and plate models were locked distally at the same level. Axial steady load with a 5 mm/m velocity was applied through the mechanical axis of femur bone models. Axial loading in the proximal femoral intramedullary nail group was 1.78-fold greater compared to the plate group. All bones that had the plate applied were fractured in the portion containing the distal locking screw.Conclusion:The proximal femoral intramedullary nail provides more stability and allows for earlier weight bearing than the locking plate when used for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Clinicians should be cautious for early weight bearing with locking plate for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.     

Outcomes and Risk Factors of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BackgroundAlthough extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) is an effective technique for femoral stem removal and for the concomitant management of proximal femoral deformities, complications including persistent pain, trochanteric nonunion, and painful hardware can occur.MethodsThe US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried for publications utilizing the following keywords: “extended” AND “trochanteric” AND “osteotomy.”ResultsNineteen articles were included in the present study with 1478 ETOs. The mean overall union rate of the ETO was 93.1% (1377 of 1478 cases), while the overall rate of radiographic femoral stem subsidence >5 mm was 7.1% (25 of 350 cases). ETO union rates and femoral stem subsidence rates were similar between patients with periprosthetic fractures treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision and ETO and patients treated with THA revision and ETO for reasons other than fractures. There was limited evidence that prior femoral cementation and older age might negatively influence ETO union rates.ConclusionThere was moderate quality evidence to show that the use of ETO in aseptic patients undergoing single-stage revision THA is safe and effective, with a 7% rate of ETO nonunion and subsidence >5 mm in 7%. ETO can be safely used in cases with periprosthetic fractures in which stem fixation is jeopardized and a reimplantation is required. A well-conducted ETO should be preferred in selective THA revision cases to prevent intraoperative femoral fractures which are associated with deteriorated clinical outcomes. The use of trochanteric plate with cables should be considered as the first choice for ETO fixation.     

Benefits and harms of locking plate osteosynthesis in intraarticular (OTA Type C) fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review

IntroductionLocking plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures are widely recommended and used, even in complex intraarticular fracture patterns such as AO/OTA Type C fractures. We systematically reviewed clinical studies assessing the benefits and harms of osteosynthesis with angle stable plates in AO/OTA Type C fractures of the proximal humerus.MethodsWe conducted an iterative search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Cinahl, and PEDro in all languages from 1999 to November 2010. Eligible studies should study the outcome for Type C fractures after primary osteosynthesis with locking plate within two weeks of injury, and a follow-up period of six months or more. Patients should be evaluated with the Constant–Murley Score (CS). Two observers extracted data independently.ResultsTwelve studies and 282 Type C fractures were included. Results were categorised according to study type and synthesised qualitatively. No randomised clinical trials were identified. Two comparative, observational studies reported a mean CS of 71 (relative to contralateral shoulder) and 75 (non-adjusted Constant Score) for Type C fractures. For all studies mean non-adjusted CS ranged from 53 to 75. Mean age- and sex-adjusted CS ranged from 60 to 88. Mean CS relative to the contralateral shoulder ranged from 71 to 85. The most common complications were avascular necrosis (range, 4–33%), screw perforations (range, 5–20%), loss of fixation (range, 3–16%), impingement (range, 7–11%) and infections range 4–19%. Reoperation rate ranged from 6 to 44%.ConclusionsInsufficient study designs and unclear reporting preclude safe treatment recommendations. Complication and reoperation rates were unexpected high. Based on the studies included we cannot routinely recommend the use of locking plates in AO/OTA Type C fractures.     

Bone Hook Reduction Technique Combined with Lateral Parapatellar Arthrotomy for Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Technical Note

ObjectiveTo report a bone hook reduction technique combined with lateral parapatellar arthrotomy for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsFrom April 2012 to June 2018, a total of 31 knees who underwent this technique for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following TKA were retrospectively reviewed. Through a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy, the vastus lateralis fascia was dissected from the muscle belly to allow anteromedial mobilization of the muscles. With direct visualization of the posteriorly angulated distal fragment, a bone hook was placed on the anterior flange of the femoral component. The hook was then elevated to correct the posteriorly angulated and shortened distal fragment. The coronal and sagittal alignments of the distal segment with the femoral shaft were confirmed using fluoroscopic images, and internal fixation was performed using an anatomically pre‐contoured lateral locked plate. Once the overall length and sagittal plane alignment were restored, the plate was inserted via the previous articular approach. The plate was centered on the femur using anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy and then fixed.ResultsA total of 28 patients underwent internal fixation using the bone hook reduction technique combined with lateral parapatellar arthrotomy for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following TKA. The average age at operation was 70.9 years (range, 62–83 years), and the average follow‐up period was 17.5 months (range, 12–48.5 months). Fractures were classified as Su type I (13/28 [46.4%]), type II (11/28 [39.3%]), and type III (4/28 [14.3%]). Bone union was confirmed radiographically in all patients.ConclusionThe bone hook reduction technique is a simple and effective method to reduce the distal fragment in periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following TKA.