The significance of motor-point tenderness in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusions

Summary The relationship between tender motor-points and physical signs was investigated in 48 patients with low back pain caused by intervertebral disc protrusions. There were 42 controls with no history of back pain. Motor-point tenderness was quantified on a four-point scale. All patients (except one) showed a variable degree of tenderness in the motor-points related to the relevant myotomes as determined by clinical examination. The greater the tenderness, the longer was the period of disability. The degree of tenderness seemed to have a prognostic value related to recovery from pain and the length of disability as judged by absence from work.     

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Association between disability and psychological disturbance in noncompensation patients.

STUDY DESIGN: An observational study of the relation between disability and psychological distress in patients with no on-going compensation claim who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion for chronic low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To study the change in the relation between disability and psychological distress after surgical management for low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patient-related factors such as an on-going compensation claim and patient psychology are thought to influence the outcome of low back pain management. METHODS: Of the 58 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion for low back pain between 1990 and 1995, 53 were observed for a mean duration of 2.7 years after surgery. Oswestry Disability scores and Distress and Risk Assessment Method scores were collected before surgery and at the follow-up examination. RESULTS: Improvement of 10 points on the Oswestry Disability Score was observed in 52.8% of the patients. However, the results in patients who were distressed before surgery were similar to the results observed in healthy patients. The difference in the Oswestry Disability Scores was 3.1 (95% confidence intervals [-9.9, 16.2], P = 0.297). The change in Distress and Risk Assessment Method scores showed a significant relation to change in the Oswestry Disability Scores (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative improvement in disability was not found to be related to preoperative psychology as measured by the Distress and Risk Assessment Method score. Change in disability is significantly related to change in distress.     

Psychological and functional profiles in select subjects with low back pain.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Some researchers have found a correlation of poor treatment outcomes in patients with low back pain and abnormal psychological profiles, whereas others have failed to confirm this correlation. A critical feature of this debate has been whether abnormal psychological profiles seen in patients with back pain are the result of the ongoing back pain or whether pre-existing psychological features predispose to a poor clinical outcome. PURPOSE: To determine the relationship of psychometric testing scores to the presence and duration of back pain of differing causes. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a prospective observational study of the psychological profiles of groups of patients with low back pain and controls. PATIENT SAMPLE: Subjects having a variety of painful back conditions (n=310) were compared with a control group of subjects without low back complaints who had undergone cervical spine surgery (n=73). OUTCOMES MEASURES: Psychometric testing (Modified Zung and Modified Somatic Pain Questionnaire) was performed along with pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]), a standardized Low Back Pain Questionnaire, and the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire in the evaluation of back pain and control subjects. METHODS: The subjects with painful back conditions included patients with presumed discogenic pain undergoing discography (n=95); patients with symptomatic isthmic spondylolisthesis coming to fusion (n=61); patients with chronic vertebral osteomyelitis before diagnosis and treatment (n=39). There was also a nonpatient group of soldiers with chronic low back pain not seeking medical care (n=115). The control subjects without low back pain consisted of a group who had undergone cervical spine surgery (n=73). Psychometric testing was performed and compared in the evaluation of subjects having these different painful back conditions. Analysis was done comparing pain scores, function scores, and psychological testing scores between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. RESULTS: The VAS maximum in last week score for the entire group was 7.1, and scores were not significantly different in all low back pain groups. The Oswestry scores were poorest in the discography group compared to spondylolisthesis and osteomyelitis. Functional scores were similar in the soldiers with low back pain and controls without low back pain. Both Depression and Somatic Pain scores were most abnormal in the discogenic low back pain group. Only 21% of this group had normal scores, compared with 71% of the spondylolisthesis group, 79% of osteomyelitis group, and 88% of the group with chronic low back pain not seeking treatment (p<.001 in all groups). The asymptomatic control group had 85% normal scores. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar pain levels and pain duration, patients with the discographic diagnosis of discogenic back pain have poorer functional scores and very abnormal psychological scores compared with other subjects with chronic low back pain resulting from spondylolisthesis requiring surgery or chronic pyogenic osteomyelitis. Chronic moderately severe mechanical low back pain in healthy subjects was not associated with abnormal psychological scores or functional disability.     

Assessing outcome in lumbar disc surgery using patient completed measures

Measuring outcome after spinal surgery is difficult. The objective of this study was to assess the use of four measures in establishing outcome in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy. Forty-six consecutive patients who had undergone two operations for lumbar disc prolapse and 54 patients who had undergone one operation for the same condition over the same period were identified. The SF-36 questionnaire was used to assess general health. The Roland-Morris questionnaire and a simple modification of the Roland-Morris questionnaire were used to assess back and leg related disability, respectively. Analogue pain scales were used to measure back pain and sciatica. The SF-36 scores revealed significantly worse health status in the two operation compared with the one operation patients and in all patients compared with the normal population. Using the Roland-Morris and the leg disability questionnaires, patients who had undergone two operations reported significantly worse disability (Roland-Morris, 53%, poor outcome) than those who had undergone one operation (Roland-Morris, 19%, poor outcome). There was significantly greater back disability than leg disability in both groups of patients and this was confirmed by the analogue pain scales. In patients who had undergone two operations, 25% classified their back pain as very bad or unbearable, and 22.5% described very bad or unbearable leg pain. For the one operation patients these figures were 9.5 and 2.4%, respectively. The results demonstrate that both generic and condition specific patient completed measures have the potential to detect differences in outcome between patients who have undergone either one or two lumbar disc operations. The study provides support for the use of these patient completed measures in assessing outcome in lumbar disc surgery.     

Abdominal differential diagnosis in a patient referred to a physical therapy clinic for low back pain

STUDY DESIGN: Resident's case problem. BACKGROUND: Acute back pain most often presents as musculoskeletal in nature; however, less frequently it may be the result of an underlying, or coexisting, systemic pathology. When present, the signs and symptoms of systemic pathology can mimic, or be masked by, musculoskeletal back pain, which may pose a diagnostic challenge during the clinical evaluation. The purpose of this resident's case problem is to describe the clinical reasoning process leading to a medical referral for a patient who presented to physical therapy with debilitating low back pain. DIAGNOSIS: The patient in this resident's case problem was a 67-year-old male referred to physical therapy with a 2-week history of severe low back pain and muscle spasms. The patient history and physical examination were suggestive of musculoskeletal back pain and physical therapy treatment was initiated. Abdominal pain was elicited during an introductory therapeutic exercise, which was recognized by the therapist as a potential sign of abdominal pathology. The therapist performed an additional review of systems and an abdominal screening examination, which established the necessity of an immediate medical referral. At the emergency department, ominous abdominal pathology was safely ruled out through diagnostic imaging and the patient was treated for secondary gastrointestinal effects of opioid analgesic medications. DISCUSSION: This resident's case problem provides an opportunity to discuss the clinical reasoning process leading to the suspicion of abdominal pathology. Specifically, this case reinforces the importance of recognizing potential signs of systemic pathology, executing an appropriate physical examination, including screening of the involved anatomical region, and providing an appropriate medical referral when indicated.     

A stiff and straight back preoperatively is associated with a good outcome 2 years after lumbar disc surgery: A prospective study of 80 patients

Background and purpose The degree of lumbar lordosis and reduced lumbar mobility are regarded as important clinical features in patients with low back pain, and in lumbar disc herniation A more stiff back preoperatively in a proportion of patients has been shown to be associated with sequestered disc herniation. The main aim of this study was to investigate whether there was any correlation between lumbar lordosis and flexion on the one hand in patients with lumbar disc herniation who were scheduled for surgery, and postoperative pain and disability on the other. Our second aim was to determine the patterns of postoperative improvement in pain, perceived disability, and flexion/lordosis for 2 years after surgery.Methods Pain (VAS), disability (DRI), lumbar flexion and lordosis (Debrunner''s kyfometer) were measured pre- and postoperatively in 80 patients who underwent microscopic lumbar disc surgery.Results Patients with preoperative hyperlordosis had more severe pain and more disability postoperatively than patients with hypolordosis. The level of pain did not change much from 2–6 weeks postoperatively until 2 years, while the perceived disability did not reach a steady state until 6 months after surgery.Interpretation Patients with a stiff and flat back have a good prognosis after lumbar disc surgery, and in most cases the pain will reach the 2-year level during the first 2–6 weeks, while the physical restoration measured by the lumbar flexion and lordosis, and the perceived disability, will continue to improve over the first 6 months after surgery.     

Does the evidence for spinal manipulation translate into better outcomes in routine clinical care for patients with occupational low back pain? A case-control study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous research has identified clinical characteristics of patients who are likely to respond favorably to thrust manipulation. The application of this evidence and its effect on clinical outcomes among patients with occupational low back pain has not been examined. PURPOSE: Examine patients treated in physical therapy with occupational low back pain who fit a subgroup likely to respond to thrust manipulation. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of clinical database. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with low back pain of less than 16 days duration with no symptoms distal to the knee or signs of nerve root compression receiving workers' compensation and referred to physical therapy were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-report measures: numeric pain rating and Oswestry disability questionnaire. FUNCTIONAL MEASURES: Number of visits, duration, and costs of physical therapy. METHODS: Physical therapy notes for the first two sessions were examined. Patients were categorized as having received thrust manipulation, nonthrust manipulation, or no manipulation. Pain intensity and disability were recorded at initial and final sessions. The number of sessions, length of stay, and costs of physical therapy were recorded. Comparisons were made between patients receiving manipulation versus no manipulation, and between those receiving thrust versus nonthrust manipulation. RESULTS: Two hundred fifteen patients were included (mean age 35.9 [+/-10.1] years, 67.9% male). Thrust manipulation was received by 107 (49.8%) patients; 36 (16.7%) received nonthrust manipulation and 72 (33.5%) received no manipulation. Patients receiving manipulation (thrust or nonthrust) experienced greater reductions in pain and disability with treatment. Patients receiving thrust manipulation had fewer sessions, a shorter length of stay, and lower costs in physical therapy than patients receiving nonthrust manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supporting superior clinical outcomes with the use of manipulation for a subgroup of patients was corroborated by this retrospective review of patients with occupational low back pain. The use of thrust manipulation appeared to be more efficient than the use of nonthrust manipulation for these patients.     

Effect of depressive symptoms on perceived disability in patients with chronic shoulder pain

Background

Psychological distress may be an important determinant of perceived disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. We evaluated the relationship between depressive symptoms and perceived disability in patients with chronic shoulder pain and quantified the contribution made by depression to perceived disability.

Methods

In this prospective study, 109 patients with chronic shoulder pain caused by degenerative or inflammatory disorders were evaluated using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale to determine relationships between depressive symptoms and perceived disability in patients with chronic shoulder pain. In addition, pain scores were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) during activity, and range of motion (ROM) and abduction strength (strength) measurements were measured. Multivariate analyses of variance and regression modeling were used to assess the relative contributions made by depressive symptoms (CES-D) and other clinical parameters to patient-perceived disability (DASH).

Results

DASH scores were found to be moderately correlated (0.3?r?r?=?0.58; p?p?p?=?0.04 respectively). Multiple stepwise regression analyses revealed that gender, ROM, pain VAS and CES-D scores independently predicted DASH score and accounted for 43?% of the variance. CES-D score was found to be the strongest predictor of DASH score and accounted for 23?% of the variance.

Conclusions

Degrees of depressive symptoms were found to be significantly associated with higher symptom scores and greater disability in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Although a large proportion of perceived disability remains unexplained, perceived disability in patients with chronic shoulder pain was found to be strongly influenced by depressive symptoms.

Type of study/level of evidence

Level 2, prospective cohort study, prognostic study.     

Provocative discography in patients after limited lumbar discectomy: A controlled, randomized study of pain response in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study of patients with low back pain and those without after laminotomy and discectomy. OBJECTIVES: To determine, using a strict experimental design, the relative pain intensity response to provocative discography in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects after lumbar discectomy for intervertebral disc herniation. BACKGROUND: Provocative discography frequently is used to evaluate persistent or recurrent low back pain syndromes in patients who have undergone posterior discectomy. The validity of interpreting painful injections during this procedure has not been critically assessed. The prevalence of significantly painful disc injections in a group with good outcomes after surgery is not known. Knowing the rates of significantly painful injections in asymptomatic patients after lumbar discectomy may clarify the meaning of painful injections in symptomatic patients. METHODS: From a cohort of 240 patients who had undergone single-level limited discectomy for sciatica, 20 asymptomatic volunteers were recruited for experimental three-level lumbar discography. Inclusion criteria required nearly perfect scores on standardized back pain rating instruments, no other spinal pathology, and normal psychometric screening. A control group of 27 symptomatic patients, after single-level discectomy with intractable low back pain syndrome, and without other spinal pathology, underwent discography. Seven patients in the control group had normal psychometric tests. Experienced raters who were blinded to control versus experimental status of the subjects scored the magnetic resonance imaging, discogram, psychometric tests, and discography videotapes of the subjects' pain behavior. RESULTS: There were 8 of 20 (40%) positive injections of discs that had previous surgery in the asymptomatic group and 17 of 27 (63%) positive injections in the symptomatic group. Specifically with regard to the symptomatic group, there were 3 of 7 (43%) positive injections (all concordant) in patients with normal psychometric scores, as compared with 14 of 20 (70%) positive injections (12 concordant) in patients with abnormal psychometric scores. Injections of discs that had previous surgery resulted in a mean pain score of 2.1 of 5 in the asymptomatic group, 2.1 in the symptomatic group with normal psychometric scores, and 3.4 in the symptomatic group with abnormal psychometric scores. Of the discs not treated with surgery, 2 were positive in the asymptomatic group (10%), 3 in 2 symptomatic subjects with normal psychological testing (29), and 18 in 13 symptomatic subjects with abnormal psychometric testing (76%). CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of asymptomatic patients with normal psychometric testing who previously have undergone lumbar discectomy will have significant pain on injection of their discs that had previous surgery (40%). This is not significantly different from the experience of symptomatic patients with normal psychometric testing undergoing discography on discs that had previous surgery. Patients with abnormal psychological profiles have significantly higher rates of positive disc injections than either asymptomatic volunteers or symptomatic subjects with normal psychological screening.     

Self-reported assessment of disability and performance-based assessment of disability are influenced by different patient characteristics in acute low back pain

For an individual, the functional consequences of an episode of low back pain is a key measure of their clinical status. Self-reported disability measures are commonly used to capture this component of the back pain experience. In non-acute low back pain there is some uncertainty of the validity of this approach. It appears that self-reported assessment of disability and direct measurements of functional status are only moderately related. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated this relationship in a sample of 94 acute low back pain patients. Both self-reported disability and a performance-based assessment of disability were assessed, along with extensive profiling of patient characteristics. Scale consistency of the performance-based assessment was investigated using Cronbach’s alpha, the relationship between self-reported and performance-based assessment of disability was investigated using Pearson’s correlation. The relationship between clinical profile and each of the disability measures were examined using Pearson’s correlations and multivariate linear regression. Our results demonstrate that the battery of tests used are internally reliable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86). We found only moderate correlations between the two disability measures (r = 0.471, p < 0.001). Self-reported disability was significantly correlated with symptom distribution, medication use, physical well-being, pain intensity, depression, somatic distress and anxiety. The only significant correlations with the performance-based measure were symptom distribution, physical well-being and pain intensity. In the multivariate analyses no psychological measure made a significant unique contribution to the prediction of the performance-based measure, whereas depression made a unique contribution to the prediction of the self-reported measure. Our results suggest that self-reported and performance-based assessments of disability are influenced by different patient characteristics. In particular, it appears self-reported measures of disability are more influenced by the patient’s psychological status than performance-based measures of disability.     

Relationship of pain drawings to invasive tests assessing intervertebral disc pathology

It has been found that the pain patterns in pain drawings are related to the presence of herniated disc identified by myelography. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the pattern of pain in the drawings or the type of pain indicated (aching, burning, numbness, pins and needles, stabbing) was related to the presence of symptomatic disc pathology identified by CT/discography. In a subgroup of patients who underwent myelography, the relationship of the drawings to myelographic findings was also investigated. Pain drawings were completed by 187 patients with low back and/or radicular pain who were undergoing CT/discography. The drawings were scored in two ways, first by the system described by Ransford and secondly by visual inspection. They were classified as being indicative, or not, of disc pathology. The CT/discograms were classified as disrupted, or not, and the pain responses were recorded upon injection of each disc, based on the similarity of the pain provoked to clinical symptoms. Among the 133 patients with discogenic pain confirmed by discography, 110 (82.7%) had pain drawings that were classified as indicative. Among the 45 patients without discogenic pain, 29 (64.4%) had pain drawings classified as non-indicative. Patients with discogenic pain used more symbols indicating burning pain and aching pain than did non-discogenic pain patients. Our results confirmed those reported earlier by Udén, who found a relationship between the pattern of pain in the drawings and myelographic findings. Pain drawings may be helpful in the diagnosis of symptomatic disc pathology. Received: 26 February 1998 Revised: 31 August 1998 Accepted: 26 October 1998     

The relationship between physical activity and low back pain outcomes: a systematic review of observational studies

Although clinical guidelines advocate exercise and activity in the management of non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), the link between levels of physical activity and outcomes is unclear. This systematic review investigated the relationships between free living activity levels after onset of low back pain (LBP) and measures of pain, and disability in patients with NSLBP. Cohort and cross-sectional studies were located using OVID, CINAHL, Medline, AMED, Embase, Biomed, PubMed-National Library of Medicine, Proquest and Cochrane Databases, and hand searches of reference lists. Studies were included if a statistical relationship was investigated between measures of free living physical activity (PA) in subjects with LBP and LBP outcome measures. Twelve studies (seven cohort and five cross-sectional) were included. One prospective study reported a statistically significant relationship between increased leisure time activity and improved LBP outcomes, and one cross-sectional study found that lower levels of sporting activity were associated with higher levels of pain and disability. All other studies (n = 10) found no relationship between measures of activity levels and either pain or disability. Heterogeneity of study designs, particularly in terms of activity measurement, made comparisons between studies difficult. These data suggest that the activity levels of patients with NSLBP are neither associated with, nor predictive of, disability or pain levels. Validated activity measurement in prospective research is required to better evaluate the relationships between PA and LBP.     

腰椎退行性疾患接受腰椎融合术后发生下腰痛和腰椎矢状位序列的相关性研究

目的探讨分析腰椎退行性疾患接受腰椎融合术后发生下腰痛和腰椎矢状位序列的相关性。方法回顾性分析我院于2010年2月~2011年6月收治的38例接受腰椎融合术的腰椎退行性疾病且术后发生下腰痛患者的临床资料,于所有患者出院后进行为期24个月的随访。在手术前及随访期间收集所有患者站立位X线片腰椎前凸的Cobb角,并分析其与患者下腰痛程度之间的相关性。结果术后12个月及24个月与手术前的腰椎矢状位Cobb角比较,均无统计学意义(分别为t=0.042,P=0.967及t=0.268,P=0.789);术后12个月及24个月的腰椎矢状位Cobb角与正常角度的差值与手术前比较均无统计学意义(分别为t=0.450,P=0.900及t=0.174,P=0.862)。术后12个月及24个月的VAS评分与手术前相比,有明显改善(分别为t=2.838,P=0.006及t=3.251,P=0.002),而术后12个月及24个月的ODI评分与手术前相比也有明显改善(分别为t=2.300,P=0.024及t=3.320,P=0.001)。术后12个月及24个月所有患者的腰椎前凸丢失与VAS评分及ODI评分均呈正相关(P0.05)。结论腰椎前凸角度的丢失与腰椎退行性疾患腰椎融合术后的腰痛关系密切,手术过程中腰椎前凸的重建十分重要。     

A cross-sectional study correlating lumbar spine degeneration with disability and pain

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation between degeneration in the lumbar spine and self-reported disability and pain levels in patients with and without a history of trauma. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The link between lumbar spine degeneration and low back pain remains controversial, as does the correlation between trauma and spinal degeneration. METHODS: Radiographic and questionnaire data were collected from 172 consecutive patients with low back pain. Back pain severity was measured using two scales: one for pain over the entire episode and one for pain during the previous week. All patients also completed the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire before radiography was performed. Further questions concerning the chronicity of symptoms and trauma were included. RESULTS: Controlling for age, patients with low back pain with a history of trauma had a statistically significant increase in the severity of facet degeneration (P < 0.02) compared with nontrauma patients with low back pain. However, there was no difference in disability and pain scores between the trauma and nontrauma patients or between the genders. A weak correlation between pain severity ratings and the number of levels of degeneration and the severity of the degeneration at the disc and facets was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low back pain with a history of trauma had more severe facet arthrosis than do nontrauma patients with low back pain, but there were no differences in pain and disability. There was a weak correlation between the quantity and severity of lumbar degeneration with pain levels, but not with disability scores. These findings are discussed in the light of recent reports regarding the cervical spine.     

Lumbar percutaneous facet rhizotomy

The author reports on 223 patients who underwent lumbar percutaneous facet rhizotomy for chronic low-back or chronic back and leg pain. The overall success rate was 69%. The procedure is very safe and can offer relief for many patients in whom organic pathology, most commonly a herniated lumbar disc, has been eliminated. The procedure, screening and results are discussed.     

The Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties.

BACKGROUND CONTENT: There are currently a number of generic and disease-specific instruments for assessing complaints of low back pain (LBP). None provide the comprehensive coverage of the wide range of factors that are considered essential in evaluating treatment outcomes. PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a comprehensive, disease-specific questionnaire for characterizing complaints of LBP and evaluating the outcomes of treatments for these complaints. STUDY DESIGN: A clinical-cohort study of a large, convenience sample of LBP patients. METHODS: We have developed a comprehensive, disease-specific questionnaire for characterizing complaints of LBP and evaluating the outcomes of treatments for these complaints. A large group of patients who sought treatment for LBP (n=2539) completed the Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire (LSOQ) before treatment, and at 12 and 24 months after treatment. For each subject and for each evaluation period, scores on six composite measures were derived from the subjects' responses to the questionnaire: a LBP severity score, a leg pain severity score, a functional disability score, a psychological distress score, a physical symptoms score, and a health-care utilization score. These scores were used to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the questionnaire. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability of the LSOQ was evaluated by correlating the subject's 12-month scores on each composite measure with the corresponding 24-month scores. Intraclass coefficients of correlation were used. The obtained coefficients of correlation [(a) LBP severity, 0.87; (b) leg pain severity, 0.85; (c) functional disability, 0.87; (d) psychological distress, 0.88; (e) physical symptoms other than pain, 0.82; and (f) health-care utilization, 0.76] indicate good test-retest reliability for the LSOQ. Construct validity was evaluated by correlating scores on the composite measures derived from the LSOQ with scores on measures of the same constructs derived from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey. The coefficients of correlation were relatively high (mostly between .7 and .9), indicating good construct validity. Construct validity was also evaluated by comparing the scores of groups of subjects who were known to differ or not to differ on the composite measures, using multivariate analyses of variance. Significant multivariate and univariate differences were obtained between groups who were expected to differ (ie, surgically and nonsurgically treated patients). No significant differences were found for groups who were not expected to differ (ie, patients with similar diagnosis, but different surgical treatments). Responsiveness was assessed by evaluating differences in the 24-month change scores between improved and unimproved subjects. Large and significant differences were obtained between improved and unimproved subjects for all composite measures derived from the LSOQ. The observed effect sizes ranged from .68 to 1.17 indicating that the LSOQ is highly responsive. CONCLUSION: The LSOQ appears to be acceptable to patients, easy to administer, highly reliable, valid, and responsive. It provides information on demographics, pain severity, functional disability, psychological distress, physical symptoms, health-care utilization, and satisfaction. It should be considered for use in both clinical and research applications as well as regulatory review involving patients with LBP complaints.     

Effects of unstable shoes on chronic low back pain in health professionals: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of unstable shoes in reducing low back pain in health professionals.MethodsOf a volunteer sample of 144 participants, 40 with nonspecific chronic low back pain were eligible and enrolled in this study. Participants were randomized to an intervention group, who wore unstable shoes (model MBT Fora), or a control group, who wore conventional sports shoes (model Adidas Bigroar). The participants had to wear the study shoes during their work hours, and at least 6 hours per workday, over a period of 6 weeks. The primary outcome was low back pain assessed on a Visual Analog Scale. The secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, disability evaluated using Roland-Morris questionnaire and quality of life evaluated using EQ-VAS.ResultsThe intervention group showed a significant decrease in pain scores compared to the control group. The rate of satisfaction was higher in the intervention group (79%) compared to the control group (25%). There was no significant difference for the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire score and the EQ-VAS scale.ConclusionsThe results of this clinical trial suggest that wearing unstable shoes for 6 weeks significantly decreases low back pain in patients suffering from chronic low back pain but had no significant effect on quality of life and disability scores.     

Spinal tumors in coexisting degenerative spine disease—a differential diagnostic problem

The clinical presentation of spinal tumors is known to vary, in many instances causing a delay in diagnosis and treatment, especially with benign tumors. Neck or back pain and sciatica, with or without neurological deficits, are mostly caused by degenerative spine and disc disease. Spinal tumors are rare, and the possibility of concurrent signs of degenerative changes in the spine is high. We report a series of ten patients who were unsuccessfully treated for degenerative spine disease. They were subsequently referred for operative treatment to our department, where an initial diagnosis of a tumor was made. Two patients had already been operated on for disc herniations, but without long-lasting effects. In eight patients the diagnosis of a tumor was made preoperatively. In two cases the tumor was found intraoperatively. All patients showed radiological signs of coexisting degenerative spine disease, making diagnosis difficult. MRI was the most helpful tool for diagnosing the tumors. A frequent symptom was back pain in the recumbent position. Other typical settings that should raise suspicion are persistent pain after disc surgery and neurological signs inconsistent with the level of noted degenerative disease. Tumor extirpation was successful in treating the main complaints in all but one patient. There was an incidence of 0.5% of patients in which a spinal tumor was responsible for symptoms thought to be of degenerative origin. However, this corresponds to 28.6% of all spine-tumor patients in this series. MRI should be widely used to exclude a tumor above the level of degenerative pathology.     

Outcome of percutaneous rupture of lumbar synovial cysts: a case series of 101 patients

Background contextLumbar facet joint synovial cysts are benign degenerative abnormalities of the lumbar spine. Previous reports have supported operative and nonoperative management. Facet joint steroid injection with cyst rupture is occasionally performed, but there has been no systematic evaluation of this treatment option.PurposeTo profile the role of facet joint steroid injections with cyst rupture in the treatment of lumbar facet joint synovial cysts.Study design/settingRetrospective chart review and long-term follow-up of patients treated for lumbar facet joint synovial cysts.Patient sampleOne hundred one patients treated for lumbar facet joint synovial cysts with fluoroscopically guided corticosteroid facet joint injection and attempted cyst rupture.Outcome measuresOswestry Disability Index and numeric rating scale score for back and leg pain.MethodsA retrospective review and a subsequent interview were conducted to collect pretreatment and posttreatment pain and disability scores along with details of subsequent treatment interventions. Group differences in pain and disability scores were assessed using paired t test. Multiple clinical factors were analyzed in terms of risk for surgical intervention using logistic regression modeling and Cox proportional hazards modeling.ResultsSuccessful cyst rupture was confirmed fluoroscopically in 81% of cases. Fifty-five patients (54%) required subsequent surgery over a period averaging 8.4 months because of inadequate symptom relief. All patients reported significant improvement in back pain, leg pain, and disability at 3.2 years postinjection, regardless of their subsequent treatment course (p<.0001 in all groups). There was no significant difference in current pain between patients who received injections only and those who underwent subsequent surgery.ConclusionsThis study presents the largest clinical series of nonsurgical treatment for lumbar facet joint synovial cysts. Lumbar facet joint steroid injection with attempted cyst rupture is correlated with avoiding subsequent surgery in half of treated patients. Successful cyst rupture does not appear to have added benefit, and it was associated with worse disability 3 years postinjection. Long-term outcomes are similar, regardless of subsequent surgery.     

Mid- and long-term results of open discectomy: a clinical study with three to twelve years of follow-up

Abstract Long-term studies on the results of open discectomy (OD) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation have shown a high percentage of patients complaining of low back or leg pain and obtaining a permanent disability allowance. We evaluated the clinical results of OD in a consecutive series of patients with 3–12 years of follow-up. A standard questionnaire, containing the Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ), was administered to 94 patients who had undergone OD at our institute between 1991 and 1999. A total of 85 patients (55.2%) gave complete information for the study; their mean follow-up was 85.9 months. Forty patients (25.9%) consented to a second clinical examination. The overall mean Oswestry disability index (ODI) was 17.43. At clinical follow-up, 29 of 40 patients (72.5%) suffered low back pain (LBP) with a mean ODI of 21.56. The presence of LBP correlated positively with a higher ODI score. Re-operation was performed in 11 of 85 patients: a 2nd OD procedure was done for recurrent disc herniation in 6 cases and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with posterior instrumentation was performed in 5 patients with disabling LBP. ODI scores in these two groups were respectively 37.33 and 13.2 with a significant difference. Long-term studies on OD have shown a deterioration of the clinical results with time. LBP is the complaint most responsible for a patients disability. Our study shows that at the mid- to long-term follow-up, OD still provides good clinical results, but also reveals a high percentage of LBP that is related to the onset of a symptomatic insufficiency of the operated disc. These data seem to be confirmed by the significant improvement of ODI after PLIF.