Nociceptive responses in melatonin MT2 receptor knockout mice compared to MT1 and double MT1/MT2 receptor knockout mice

Melatonin, a neurohormone that binds to two G protein-coupled receptors MT₁ and MT_2, is involved in pain regulation, but the distinct role of each receptor has yet to be defined. We characterized the nociceptive responses of mice with genetic inactivation of melatonin MT₁ (MT₁^−/−), or MT₂ (MT₂^−/−), or both MT₁/MT₂ (MT₁^−/−/MT₂^−/−) receptors in the hot plate test (HPT), and the formalin test (FT). In HPT and FT, MT₁^−/− display no differences compared to their wild-type littermates (CTL), whereas both MT₂^−/− and MT₁^−/−/MT₂^−/− mice showed a reduced thermal sensitivity and a decreased tonic nocifensive behavior during phase 2 of the FT in the light phase. The MT₂ partial agonist UCM924 induced an antinociceptive effect in MT₁^−/− but not in MT₂^−/− and MT₁^−/−/MT₂^−/− mice. Also, the competitive opioid antagonist naloxone had no effects in CTL, whereas it induced a decrease of nociceptive thresholds in MT₂^−/− mice. Our results show that the genetic inactivation of melatonin MT₂, but not MT₁ receptors, produces a distinct effect on nociceptive threshold, suggesting that the melatonin MT₂ receptor subtype is selectively involved in the regulation of pain responses.     

The antidepressant-like effect of the melatonin receptor ligand luzindole in mice during forced swimming requires expression of MT2 but not MT1 melatonin receptors

We previously reported an antidepressant-like effect in C3H/HeN mice during the forced swimming test (FST) following treatment with the MT1/MT2 melatonin receptor ligand, luzindole. This study investigated the role melatonin receptors (MT1 and/or MT2) may play in the effect of luzindole in the FST using C3H/HeN mice with a genetic deletion of either MT1 (MT1KO) or MT2 (MT2KO) melatonin receptors. In the light phase (ZT 9-11), luzindole (30 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly decreased immobility during swimming in both wild type (WT) (135.6 +/- 25.3 s, n = 7) and MT(1)KO (132.6 +/- 13.3 s, n = 8) as compared with vehicle-treated mice (WT: 207.1 +/- 6.0 s, n = 7; MT1KO: 209.5 +/- 6.2 s, n = 8) (P < 0.001). In the dark phase (ZT 20-22), luzindole also decreased time of immobility in both WT (89.5 +/- 13.9 s, n = 8) and MT1KO (66.5 +/- 6.4 s, n = 8) mice as compared with the vehicle treated (WT: 193.8 +/- 3.5, n = 6; MT1KO: 176.6 +/- 6.2 s, n = 8) (P < 0.001). Genetic disruption of the MT1 gene did not alter the diurnal rhythm of serum melatonin in MT1KO mice (ZT 9-11: 1.3 +/- 0.6 pg/mL, n = 7; ZT 20-22: 10.3 +/- 1.1 pg/mL, n = 8) as compared with WT (ZT 9-11: 1.4 +/- 0.7 pg/mL; ZT 20-22: 10.6 pg/mL). Swimming did not alter the serum melatonin diurnal rhythm in WT and MT1KO mice. Decreases in immobility of WT and MT1KO mice by luzindole treatment were not affected by gender or age (3 months versus 8 months). In contrast, luzindole did not decrease immobility during the FST in MT2KO mice. We conclude that the antidepressant-like effect of luzindole may be mediated through blockade of MT2 rather than MT1 melatonin receptors.     

Genetic deletion of MT1 and MT2 melatonin receptors differentially abrogates the development and expression of methamphetamine‐induced locomotor sensitization during the day and the night in C3H/HeN mice

Abstract: This study explored the role of the melatonin receptors in methamphetamine (METH)‐induced locomotor sensitization during the light and dark phases in C3H/HeN mice with genetic deletion of the MT₁ and/or MT₂ melatonin receptors. Six daily treatments with METH (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) in a novel environment during the light phase led to the development of locomotor sensitization in wild‐type (WT), MT₁KO and MT₂KO mice. Following four full days of abstinence, METH challenge (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) triggered the expression of locomotor sensitization in METH‐pretreated but not in vehicle (VEH)‐pretreated mice. In MT₁/MT₂KO mice, the development of sensitization during the light phase was significantly reduced and the expression of sensitization was completely abrogated upon METH challenge. During the dark phase the development of locomotor sensitization in METH‐pretreated WT, MT₁KO and MT₂KO mice was statistically different from VEH‐treated controls. However, WT and MT₂KO, but not MT₁KO mice receiving repeated VEH pretreatments during the dark phase expressed a sensitized response to METH challenge that is of an identical magnitude to that observed upon 6 days of METH pretreatment. We conclude that exposure to a novel environment during the dark phase, but not during the light phase, facilitated the expression of sensitization to a METH challenge in a manner dependent on MT₁ melatonin receptor activation by endogenous melatonin. We suggest that MT₁ and MT₂ melatonin receptors are potential targets for pharmacotherapeutic intervention in METH abusers.     

MT1 and MT2 melatonin receptors are expressed in nonoverlapping neuronal populations

Melatonin (MLT) exerts its physiological effects principally through two high‐affinity membrane receptors MT1 and MT2. Understanding the exact mechanism of MLT action necessitates the use of highly selective agonists/antagonists to stimulate/inhibit a given MLT receptor. The respective distribution of MT1 and MT2 within the CNS and elsewhere is controversial, and here we used a “knock‐in” strategy replacing MT1 or MT2 coding sequences with a LacZ reporter. The data show striking differences in the distribution of MT1 and MT2 receptors in the mouse brain: whereas the MT1 subtype was expressed in very few structures (notably including the suprachiasmatic nucleus and pars tuberalis), MT2 subtype receptors were identified within numerous brain regions including the olfactory bulb, forebrain, hippocampus, amygdala and superior colliculus. Co‐expression of the two subtypes was observed in very few structures, and even within these areas they were rarely present in the same individual cell. In conclusion, the expression and distribution of MT2 receptors are much more widespread than previously thought, and there is virtually no correspondence between MT1 and MT2 cellular expression. The precise phenotyping of cells/neurons containing MT1 or MT2 receptor subtypes opens new perspectives for the characterization of links between MLT brain targets, MLT actions and specific MLT receptor subtypes.     

Sleep well. Untangling the role of melatonin MT1 and MT2 receptors in sleep

The pharmacological potential of targeting selectively melatonin MT1 or MT2 receptors has not yet been exploited in medicine. Research using selective MT1/MT2 receptor ligands and MT1/MT2 receptor knockout mice has indicated that the activation of MT2 receptors selectively increases non‐rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep whereas MT1 receptors seem mostly implicated in the regulation of REM sleep. Moreover, MT1 knockout mice show an increase in NREM sleep, while MT2 knockout a decrease, suggesting an opposite role of these two receptors. A recent paper in mice by Sharma et al (J Pineal Res, 2018, e12498) found that MT1 but not MT2 receptors are expressed on orexin neurons in the perifornical lateral hypothalamus (PFH). Moreover, after injecting melatonin or luzindole into the mouse PFH, the authors suggest that melatonin promotes NREM sleep because activates PFH MT1 receptors, which in turn inhibit orexin neurons that are important in promoting arousal and maintaining wakefulness. In this commentary, we have critically commented on some of these findings on the bases of previous literature. In addition, we highlighted the fact that no conclusions could be drawn on the melatonin receptor subtype mediating the effects of melatonin on sleep because the authors used the non‐selective MT1/MT2 receptors antagonist luzindole. More solid research should further characterize the pharmacological function of these two melatonin receptors in sleep.     

Sympathetic nervous system modulates the ocular hypotensive action of MT2-melatonin receptors in normotensive rabbits

The aim of this study was to investigate the hypotensive effect of the melatonin analogue, N-butanoyl-2-(2-methoxy-6H-isoindolo[2,1-a]indol-11-yl)ethanamine (IIK7), through MT(2)-melatonin receptors and the involvement of the sympathetic nervous system in this action in New Zealand rabbit eyes. The topical application of melatonin or IIK7 produced a reduction in intraocular pressure of 20.2 +/- 5.3% and 38.5 +/- 3.2% respectively. This effect was concentration-dependent; it was blocked by selective MT(2) receptor antagonists and was severely diminished after chemical sympathectomy. Immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis showed the ciliary processes as the site of this action and no co-localization of MT(2)-melatonin receptor with the sympathetic nervous system was observed. The beta-adrenergic agonists, terbutaline and salbutamol, potentiated the hypotensive effect of IIK7 reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) 41.75 +/- 4.26% and 44.7 +/- 5.6% respectively. Also, IIK7 in presence of the nonspecific protein phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid, lowered IOP 32.2 +/- 4.5% and in presence of forskolin plus 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine decreased IOP in 32.2 +/- 5.47%. These data suggest that the melatonin agonist IIK7 reduces intraocular pressure by acting through MT(2)-melatonin receptors presumably decreasing aqueous humour formation. Also, in the presence of beta-adrenoceptor agonists MT(2)-melatonin receptors activity increase their ability to reduce IOP.     

Melatonin influences somatostatin secretion from human pancreatic δ‐cells via MT1 and MT2 receptors

Melatonin is an effector of the diurnal clock on pancreatic islets. The membrane receptor‐transmitted inhibitory influence of melatonin on insulin secretion is well established and contrasts with the reported stimulation of glucagon release from α‐cells. Virtually, nothing is known concerning the melatonin‐mediated effects on islet δ‐cells. Analysis of a human pancreatic δ‐cell model, the cell line QGP‐1, and the use of a somatostatin‐specific radioimmunoassay showed that melatonin primarily has an inhibitory effect on somatostatin secretion in the physiological concentration range. In the pharmacological range, melatonin elicited slightly increased somatostatin release from δ‐cells. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is the major second messenger dose‐dependently stimulating somatostatin secretion, in experiments employing the membrane‐permeable 8‐Br‐cAMP. 8‐Br‐cyclic guanosine monophosphate proved to be of only minor relevance to somatostatin release. As the inhibitory effect of 1 nm melatonin was reversed after incubation of QGP‐1 cells with the nonselective melatonin receptor antagonist luzindole, but not with the MT2‐selective antagonist 4‐P‐PDOT (4‐phenyl‐2‐propionamidotetraline), an involvement of the MT1 receptor can be assumed. Somatostatin release from the δ‐cells at low glucose concentrations was significantly inhibited during co‐incubation with 1 nm melatonin, an effect which was less pronounced at higher glucose levels. Transient expression experiments, overexpressing MT1, MT2, or a deletion variant as a control, indicated that the MT1 and not the MT2 receptor was the major transmitter of the inhibitory melatonin effect. These data point to a significant influence of melatonin on pancreatic δ‐cells and on somatostatin release.     

Melatonin MT1 and MT2 receptor ERK signaling is differentially dependent on Gi/o and Gq/11 proteins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transmit extracellular signals into cells by activating G protein- and β-arrestin-dependent pathways. Extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) play a central role in integrating these different linear inputs coming from a variety of GPCRs to regulate cellular functions. Here, we investigated human melatonin MT₁ and MT₂ receptors signaling through the ERK1/2 cascade by employing different biochemical techniques together with pharmacological inhibitors and siRNA molecules. We show that ERK1/2 activation by both receptors is exclusively G protein-dependent, without any participation of β-arrestin1/2 in HEK293 cells. ERK1/2 activation by MT₁ is only mediated though G_i/o proteins, while MT₂ is dependent on the cooperative activation of G_i/o and G_q/11 proteins. In the absence of G_q/11 proteins, however, MT₂-induced ERK1/2 activation switches to a β-arrestin1/2-dependent mode. The signaling cascade downstream of G proteins is the same for both receptors and involves activation of the PI3K/PKCζ/c-Raf/MEK/ERK cascade. The differential G protein dependency of MT₁- and MT₂-mediated ERK activation was confirmed at the level of EGR1 and FOS gene expression, two ERK1/2 target genes. G_i/o/G_q/11 cooperativity was also observed in Neuroscreen-1 cells expressing endogenous MT₂, whereas in the mouse retina, where MT₂ is engaged into MT₁/MT₂ heterodimers, ERK1/2 signaling is exclusively G_i/o-dependent. Collectively, our data reveal differential signaling modes of MT₁ and MT₂ in terms of ERK1/2 activation, with an unexpected G_i/o/G_q/11 cooperativity exclusively for MT₂. The plasticity of ERK activation by MT₂ is highlighted by the switch to a β-arrestin1/2-dependent mode in the absence of G_q/11 proteins and by the switch to a G_i/o mode when engaged into MT₁/MT₂ heterodimers, revealing a new mechanism underlying tissue-specific responses to melatonin.     

The role of proline residues in the structure and function of human MT2 melatonin receptor

Melatonin functions as an essential regulator of various physiological processes in all vertebrate species. In mammals, two G protein-coupled melatonin receptors (GPCR) mediate some melatonin's actions: MT1 and MT2. Transmembrane domains (TM) of most GPCRs contain a set of highly conserved proline residues that presumably play important structural and functional roles. As TM segments of MT2 receptor display several interesting differences in expression of specific proline residues compared to other rhodopsin-like receptors (rGPCRs), we investigated the role of proline residues in the structure and function of this receptor. All prolines in TM segments of MT2 receptor were individually replaced with alanine and/or glycine. In addition, the unusual NAxxY motif located in TM7 was mutated to generate highly conserved NPxxY motif found in the majority of rGPCR proteins. Following transient expression in CHO-K1 cells, binding properties of the mutant receptors and their ability to transduce signals were analyzed using (125)I-mel- and [(35)S]GTPgammaS-binding assays, respectively. The impact of the performed mutations on the receptor structure was assessed by molecular dynamic simulations of MT2 receptors embedded in the fully hydrated phospholipid bilayer. Our results indicate that residues P174, P212 and P266 are important for the ligand binding and/or signaling of the human MT2 receptor. We also show that changes within the unusual NAxxY sequence in the TM7 (mutations A305P and A305V) produce defective MT2 receptors indicating an important role of this motif in the function of melatonin receptors.     

Melatonin enhances alkaline phosphatase activity in differentiating human adult mesenchymal stem cells grown in osteogenic medium via MT2 melatonin receptors and the MEK/ERK (1/2) signaling cascade

The goals of this study were to determine (a) if melatonin enhances human adult mesenchymal stem cell (hAMSC) differentiation into osteoblasts as assessed by measuring alkaline phosphatase (ALP) enzyme activity, and (b) identify potential signal transduction pathways that mediate this process. ALP activity significantly increased in hAMSCs following a 10-day incubation in osteogenic medium, relative to hAMSCs incubated in basal growth medium alone. Melatonin (50 nm), added in combination with the osteogenic medium, significantly increased ALP activity relative to osteogenic medium alone. Co-exposure of hAMSCs to osteogenic medium supplemented with melatonin and either pertussis toxin or the melatonin receptor antagonists, luzindole or 4P-PDOT (MT2 receptor selective), inhibited the melatonin-induced increase in ALP activity, indicating the involvement of melatonin receptors, in particular, MT2 receptors. Assessment of melatonin receptor function following exposure to osteogenic medium containing either vehicle or melatonin produced dichotomous results. That is, if the differentiation of hAMSCs into an osteoblast was induced by osteogenic medium alone, then 2-[125I]-iodomelatonin binding and melatonin receptor function increased. However, examination of melatonin receptor function following chronic melatonin exposure, an exposure that resulted in a 50% enhancement in ALP activity, revealed that these receptors were desensitized. This was reflected by a complete loss in specific 2-[125I]-iodomelatonin binding as well as melatonin efficacy to inhibit forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation. Further characterization of the mechanisms underlying melatonin's effects on these differentiation processes revealed that MEK (1/2) and ERK (1/2), epidermal growth factor receptors, metalloproteinase and clathrin-mediated endocytosis were essential while PKA was not. Our results are consistent with a role for melatonin in osteoblast differentiation. If so, then, the decrease in plasma melatonin levels observed in humans during late adulthood may further enhance susceptibility to osteoporosis.     

Melatonin recovers sleep phase delayed by MK-801 through the melatonin MT2 receptor- Ca2+-CaMKII-CREB pathway in the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus

Melatonin (MLT) is widely used to treat sleep disorders although the underlying mechanism is still elusive. In mice, using wheel-running detection, we found that exogenous MLT could completely recover the period length prolonged by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) impairment due to the injection of the NMDAR antagonist MK-801, a preclinical model of psychosis. The analysis of the possible underlying mechanisms indicated that MLT could regulate the homeostatic state in the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (VLPO) instead of the circadian process in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). In addition, our data showed that MK-801 decreased Ca²⁺-related CaMKII expression and CREB phosphorylation levels in the VLPO, and MLT could rescue these intracellular impairments but not NMDAR expression levels. Accordingly, Gcamp6 AAV virus was injected in-vivo to further monitor intracellular Ca²⁺ levels in the VLPO, and MLT demonstrated a unique ability to increase Ca²⁺ fluorescence compared with MK-801-injected mice. Additionally, using the selective melatonin MT₂ receptor antagonist 4-phenyl-2-propionamidotetralin (4P-PDOT), we discovered that the pharmacological effects of MLT upon NMDAR impairments were mediated by melatonin MT₂ receptors. Using electroencephalography/electromyography (EEG/EMG) recordings, we observed that the latency to the first nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep episode was delayed by MK-801, and MLT was able to recover this delay. In conclusion, exogenous MLT by acting upon melatonin MT₂ receptors rescues sleep phase delayed by NMDAR impairment via increasing intracellular Ca²⁺ signaling in the VLPO, suggesting a regulatory role of the neurohormone on the homeostatic system.     

Microtubules modulate melatonin receptors involved in phase-shifting circadian activity rhythms: in vitro and in vivo evidence

Abstract:  MT1 melatonin receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells remain sensitive to a melatonin re-challenge even following chronic melatonin exposure when microtubules are depolymerized in the cell, an exposure that normally results in MT1 receptor desensitization. We extended our findings to MT2 melatonin receptors using both in vitro and in vivo approaches. Using CHO cells expressing human MT2 melatonin receptors, microtubule depolymerization prevents the loss in the number of high potency states of the receptor when compared to melatonin-treated cells. In addition, microtubule depolymerization increases melatonin-induced PKC activity but not PI hydrolysis via Gi proteins similar to that shown for MT1Rs. Furthermore, microtubule depolymerization in MT2-CHO cells enhances the exchange of GTP on Gi-proteins using a photoaffinity analog of GTP. To test whether microtubules are capable of modulating melatonin-induced phase-shifts, microtubules are depolymerized specifically within the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus (SCN) of the Long Evans rat and the efficacy of melatonin to phase shift their circadian activity rhythms was assessed and compared to animals with intact SCN microtubules. We find that microtubule depolymerization in the SCN using either Colcemid or nocodazole enhances the efficacy of 10 p m melatonin to phase-shift the activity rhythms of the Long Evans rat. No enhancement occurs in the presence of β-lumicolchicine, the inactive analog of Colcemid. Taken together, these data suggest that microtubule dynamics can modulate melatonin-induced phase shifts of circadian activity rhythms which may explain, in part, why circadian disturbances occur in individuals afflicted with diseases associated with microtubule disturbances.     

Coexpression of MT1 and RORalpha1 melatonin receptors in the Syrian hamster Harderian gland

Melatonin acts through several specific receptors, including membrane receptors (MT(1) and MT(2)) and members of the RZR/ROR nuclear receptors family, which have been identified in a large variety of mammalian and nonmammalian cells types. Both membrane and nuclear melatonin receptors have been partially characterized in Harderian gland of the Syrian hamster. Nevertheless, the identities of these receptors were unknown until this study, where the coexistence of MT(1) and RORalpha(1) in this gland was determined by nested RT-PCR followed by amplicon sequencing and Western-blot. Furthermore, the cellular localization of both receptors was determined by immunohistochemistry. Thus, MT(1) receptor was localized exclusively at the basal side of the cell acini, supporting the hypothesis that this receptor is activated by the pineal-synthesized melatonin. On the contrary, although a RORalpha(1)-immunoreactivity was observed in nuclei of epithelial cells of both sexes, an extranuclear specific staining, which was more frequently among those cells of males, was also seen. The implication of this possible nuclear exclusion of RORalpha(1) on the role of this indoleamine against oxidative stress is discussed.     

Anatomical and cellular localization of melatonin MT1 and MT2 receptors in the adult rat brain

The involvement of melatonin in mammalian brain pathophysiology has received growing interest, but information about the anatomical distribution of its two G‐protein‐coupled receptors, MT₁ and MT₂, remains elusive. In this study, using specific antibodies, we examined the precise distribution of both melatonin receptors immunoreactivity across the adult rat brain using light, confocal, and electron microscopy. Our results demonstrate a selective MT₁ and MT₂ localization on neuronal cell bodies and dendrites in numerous regions of the rat telencephalon, diencephalon, and mesencephalon. Confocal and ultrastructural examination confirmed the somatodendritic nature of MT₁ and MT₂ receptors, both being localized on neuronal membranes. Overall, striking differences were observed in the anatomical distribution pattern of MT₁ and MT₂ proteins, and the labeling often appeared complementary in regions displaying both receptors. Somadendrites labeled for MT₁ were observed for instance in the retrosplenial cortex, the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, the islands of Calleja, the medial habenula, the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the superior colliculus, the substantia nigra pars compacta, the dorsal raphe nucleus, and the pars tuberalis of the pituitary gland. Somadendrites endowed with MT₂ receptors were mostly observed in the CA3 field of the hippocampus, the reticular thalamic nucleus, the supraoptic nucleus, the inferior colliculus, the substantia nigra pars reticulata, and the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray. Together, these data provide the first detailed neurocytological mapping of melatonin receptors in the adult rat brain, an essential prerequisite for a better understanding of melatonin distinct receptor function and neurophysiology.     

Molecular and cellular pharmacological properties of 5‐methoxycarbonylamino‐N‐acetyltryptamine (MCA‐NAT): a nonspecific MT3 ligand

Abstract: 5‐Methoxycarbonylamino‐N‐acetyltryptamine (MCA‐NAT) has been initially described as a ligand at non MT₁, non MT₂ melatonin binding site (MT3) selective versus MT₁ and MT₂, two membrane melatonin receptors. MCA‐NAT activity has been reported by others in different models, in vivo, particularly in the intra‐ocular pressure (IOP) models in rabbits and monkeys. Its activity was systematically linked to either MT3 or to a new, yet unknown, melatonin receptor. In this article, the melatonin receptor pharmacology of MCA‐NAT is described. MCA‐NAT has micromolar range affinities at the melatonin receptors MT₁ and MT₂, while in functional studies, MCA‐NAT proved to be a powerful MT₁/MT₂ partial agonist in the sub‐micromolar range. These data strongly suggest that MCA‐NAT actions might be mediated by these receptors in vivo. Finally, as described by others, we show that MCA‐NAT is unable to elicit any type of receptor‐like functional responses from Chinese hamster ovary cells over‐expressing quinone reductase 2, the MT3.     

Evidence that membrane-bound G protein-coupled melatonin receptors MT1 and MT2 are not involved in the neuroprotective effects of melatonin in focal cerebral ischemia

Melatonin is synthesized and released by the pineal gland in a circadian rhythm, and many of its peripheral actions are mediated via membrane MT1 and MT2 receptors. Apart from its metabolic functions, melatonin is a potent neuroprotective molecule owing to its antioxidative actions. The roles of MT1 and MT2 in the neuroprotective effects of melatonin and cell signaling after cerebral ischemia remain unknown. With the use of MT1 and MT2 knockout (mt1/2(-/-) ) mice treated with melatonin, we evaluated brain injury, edema formation, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity, and signaling pathways, including CREB, ATF-1, p21, Jun kinase (JNK)1/2, p38 phosphorylation, resulting from ischemia/reperfusion injury. We show that the infarct volume and brain edema do not differ between mt1/2(-/-) and wild-type (WT) animals, but melatonin treatment decreases infarct volume in both groups and brain edema in WT animals after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Notably, melatonin's neuroprotective effect was even more pronounced in mt1/2(-/-) animals compared to that in WT animals. We also demonstrate that melatonin treatment decreased CREB, ATF-1, and p38 phosphorylation in both mt1/2(-/-) and WT mice, while p21 and JNK1/2 were reduced only in melatonin-treated WT animals in the ischemic hemisphere. Furthermore, melatonin treatment lowered iNOS activity only in WT animals. We provide evidence that the absence of MT1 and MT2 has no unfavorable effect on ischemic brain injury. In addition, the neuroprotective effects of melatonin appear to be mediated through a mechanism independent of its membrane receptors. The underlying mechanism(s) should be further studied using selective melatonin receptor agonists and antagonists.     

Decreased MT1 and MT2 melatonin receptor expression in extrapineal tissues of the rat during physiological aging

Abstract:  Aging is a complex process associated with a diminished ability to respond to stress, a progressive increase in free radical generation and a decline in immune function. Melatonin, a molecule with a great functional versatility exerts anti-oxidant, oncostatic, immunomodulatory, and anti-aging properties. Melatonin levels drop during aging and it has been speculated that the loss of melatonin may accelerate aging. This study was designed to elucidate whether aging involves responsiveness to reduced melatonin. Melatonin membrane receptor (MT1 and MT2) expression and MT1 protein expression were analyzed in extrapineal tissues (thymus, spleen, liver, kidney, and heart) of 3- and 12-month-old rats using real time polymerase chain reaction and western blotting analysis. Moreover, melatonin in tissues was measured by high performance liquid chromatography. We report for the first time, an age-related reduction in mRNA MT1 and MT2 expression levels as well as MT1 protein expression in all tissues tested except the thymus, where surprisingly, both melatonin receptor levels were significantly higher in 12-month-old rats and MT1 protein expression maintained unchanged with age. Diminished melatonin concentrations were measured in spleen, liver, and heart during aging. As a conclusion, physiological aging seems to exert responsiveness to melatonin and consequently, the loss of this potent anti-oxidant may contribute to onset of aging.     

Functional MT1 and MT2 melatonin receptors in mammals

Melatonin, dubbed the hormone of darkness, is known to regulate a wide variety of physiological processes in mammals. This review describes well-defined functional responses mediated through activation of high-affinity MT₁ and MT₂ proteinteoupled receptors viewed as potential targets for drug discovery. MT₁ melatonin receptors modulate neuronal firing, arterial vasoconstriction, cell proliferation in cancer cells, and reproductive and metabolic functions. Ativation of MT₂ melatonin receptors phase shift circadian rhythms of neuronal firing in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, inhibit dopamine release in retina, induce vasodilation and inhibition of leukocyte rolling in arterial beds, and enhance immune responses. The melatonin-mediated responses elicited by activation of MT₁ and MT₂ native melatonin receptors are dependent on circadian time, duration and mode of exposure to endogenous or exogenous melatonin, and functional receptor sensitivity. Together, these studies underscore the importance of carefully linking each melatonin receptor type to specific functional responses in target tissues to facilitate the design and development of novel therapeutic agent.     

Changes in the expression of melatonin receptors induced by melatonin treatment in hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells

Abstract:  Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and its incidence is increasing worldwide. Melatonin, an indoleamine hormone, exerts anti-oxidant, immunomodulatory, anti-aging, and antitumor effects. Previous studies have shown that melatonin can act through specific receptors, including MT₁, MT₂, MT₃ receptors as well as a nuclear receptor belonging to the orphan nuclear receptor family. Recently, we have described their role in the oncostatic and pro-apoptotic effects of melatonin on HepG2 human HCC cells. However, the potential role of the different melatonin cellular receptors on its antiproliferative effects remains unknown. In the present study, we examined the effect of melatonin treatment on HepG2 human HCC cells, analyzing cell cycle arrest and melatonin receptor expression. Melatonin was administered for 2, 4, and 6 days at 1000 or 2500 μ m . Melatonin induced a dose- and time-dependent inhibition on cell proliferation. This treatment caused an alteration in the cell cycle, with an increase in the number of cells in G₂/M phase at both 1000 and 2500 μ m melatonin concentrations, and a significant increase on S phase cell percentage by the highest dose. Furthermore, increases in protein expression of MT₁, MT₃, and retinoic acid-related orphan receptor-α were found after melatonin treatments. These increases were coincident with a significant induction in the expression of p21 protein, which negatively regulates cell cycle progression. Our results confirm the antitumor effect of melatonin in HCC cells, suggesting that its oncostatic properties are related, at least in part, to changes on the expression of their different subtypes of receptors.