A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 Caesarean sections

Anaesthesia for Caesarean section was audited over a 5 year period: 5080 cases were performed using spinal 63%, epidural top-up 26%, combined spinal-epidural 5% and primary general anaesthesia 5%. The rate of general anaesthesia conversion of regional anaesthesia was 0.8% for elective and 4.9% for emergency Caesarean section compared to Royal College of Anaesthetists targets of 1% and 3%. The rate of conversion of regional to general anaesthesia in category 1 Caesarean section was 20%. A total of 8% of women had general anaesthesia when both primary general and conversion of regional anaesthesia were combined. The rate of failure to achieve a pain-free operation was 6% with spinals, 24% with epidural top-up and 18% with combined spinal-epidural. Besides the type of anaesthesia and operative urgency, other factors associated with pre-operative failure of regional anaesthesia included body mass index, no previous Caesareans, and indication for Caesarean of acute fetal distress or maternal medical condition. Inadequacy of pre-operative anaesthetic block and duration of surgery were important risk factors for intra-operative failure. For spinal anaesthesia, use of a spinal opioid was associated with less pre-operative failure. For epidural top-up anaesthesia, lower epidural top-up volume was associated with less pre-operative failure, and use of adrenaline was associated with both less pre-operative and intra-operative failure. The rate of serious adverse incidents was 1 : 126 with general anaesthesia and 1 : 501 with regional anaesthesia.     

Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section

An evaluation of a 30 gauge spinal needle in a combined epidural/spinal anaesthetic technique for Caesarean section revealed a 25% failure rate of the spinal element. In this unit, no more than 4% of spinal anaesthetics might be expected to fail. One of the reasons for the higher failure rate was that, when using the Tuohy needle as an introducer, the dura was not identified. This prompted us to compare the 'through-the-Tuohy' or needle within needle approach for combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia, with a technique that involved siting the epidural and spinal sequentially in separate spaces. One hundred women requiring elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomised into single or double space groups. The technique failed in 16% of through-the-needle cases, and in 4% of sequential sitings. Combined spinal/epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section is more successful if each procedure is performed using separate spaces.     

Failed spinal analgesia after a combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section

A case of failed spinal analgesia with a combined spinal epidural anaesthesia (CSE) for Caesarean section is described. The lack of desired effect following an inconspicuous spinal, epidural or combined regional anaesthesia by an experienced anaesthetist is a rare and unexpected event. Especially when repeatedly observed in one patient,one should consider modified anatomical conditions of the affected spinal regions. We discuss the differential diagnosis which consists of inherent and acquired modification of tissue, neoplasia and vascular or infectious diseases. This case also confirms that not every adverse event after spinal or extradural anaesthesia is necessarily caused by the puncture.     

Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia: the single space double-barrel technique

We present our own single-space method for performing combined spinal epidural anaesthesia. A spinal introducer and a Tuohy needle are sited in the same interspace. After insertion of the epidural catheter the introducer is used as a guide for a 25 gauge spinal needle. The advantages of this technique over other methods are explored. A series of 90 patients who received combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section is presented. The incidence of side effects (hypotension, nausea and vomiting, itching, post dural puncture headache) was comparable with those of other series. However, a high incidence (26.6%) of paraesthesiae during insertion of the spinal needle was noted. We suggest that this finding may be related to the use of pencil-point needles.     

Combined spinal‐epidural vs. spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: meta‐analysis and trial‐sequential analysis

Combined spinal‐epidural and single‐shot spinal anaesthesia are both used for caesarean section. It has been claimed in individual trials that combined spinal‐epidural is associated with higher sensory spread and greater cardiovascular stability. We set out to gather all available evidence. We performed: a systematic literature search to identify randomised controlled trials comparing combined spinal‐epidural with spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: conventional meta‐analysis; trial‐sequential analysis; and assessment of trial quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Fifteen trials with high heterogeneity, including 1015 patients, were analysed. There was no significant difference between combined spinal‐epidural and spinal anaesthesia for our primary outcomes maximum sensory height and vasopressor use (mg ephedrine equivalents). However, trial‐sequential analysis suggested insufficient data and the GRADE scores showed ‘very low’ quality of evidence for these outcomes. The secondary outcomes hypotension, time for sensory block to recede to the level of T10, and the combined outcome of nausea and vomiting, did not differ significantly between the interventions. The block times were statistically significantly longer for combined spinal‐epidural in individual trials, but only one trial showed a clinically meaningful difference (11 min). Based on this analysis, and taking into consideration all comparisons irrespective of whether drugs had been applied via the epidural route, there is not enough evidence to postulate any advantage compared with the spinal technique. Future analyses and studies need to examine the potential advantages of the combined spinal‐epidural technique by using the epidural route intra‐ and/or postoperatively.     

Spinal anaesthesia for obstetrics

For a long time, epidural anaesthesia has been considered the method of choice for Caesarean delivery. The increased incidence of hypotension by the rapid onset of sympathetic blockade under spinal anaesthesia has been associated with a decline in uteroplacental blood flow and significant fetal acidosis, which may compromise neonatal well-being. Nevertheless, a decrease in fetal pH has not been shown to reduce neonatal Apgar or neurobehavioural assessment scores. Maternal blood pressure can be preserved with little side effects with low doses of vasopressors. On the other hand, spinal anaesthesia conveys significant advantages over epidural anaesthesia such as the simplicity of its use and the speed of onset, which allows neuraxial anaesthesia in urgent Caesarean sections and thus reduces the necessity for general anaesthesia. The small doses of local anaesthetics required to perform spinal anaesthesia reduce the risks of systemic toxicity to zero. Spinal anaesthesia is now considered the method of choice for urgent Caesarean section. The use of intrathecal opioids has profoundly changed the quality of spinal anaesthesia, with improved analgesia, a reduction in local anaesthetic requirements and shorter duration of motor blockade. Preliminary studies indicate that spinal anaesthesia may be safely performed in patients with severe pre-eclampsia, in whom spinal anaesthesia was previously considered contraindicated.     

Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section in a paraplegic woman: difficulty in obtaining the expected level of block

We describe the satisfactory use of combined spinal epidural (CSE) anaesthesia in the management of a 29-year-old paraplegic woman, with a spinal cord lesion at the T7 level, suffering from episodes of autonomic hyper-reflexia, during elective Caesarean section.     

Spinal myoclonus following combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section

A nulliparous woman presented with pre-eclampsia at 39 weeks' gestation. A combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia was employed for Caesarean section but the spinal component produced no discernible block, so the epidural was topped up with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.75% without problem and surgery was uneventful. A week after delivery she developed twitching of her legs and opisthotonus, that was initially thought to be eclampsia but was subsequently diagnosed as spinal myoclonus. She was treated with oral carbamazepine and diazepam, with improvement over the next 4 days, and discharged home a week later taking oral carbidopa and levodopa. Her symptoms resolved completely 6 months after the initial event.     

Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section following epidural analgesia in labour: a relative contraindication

Three cases are described in which epidural analgesia was performed during labour using an infusion of bupivacaine 0.125-0.25%. When, in all 3 cases, caesarean section was required for failure to progress, hyperbaric bupivacaine was given in doses of 10 mg, 12.5 mg and 15 mg respectively. Within 2-4 min all 3 patients had a high block, complained of difficulty in breathing and subsequently developed apnoea. The trachea was intubated after administration of thiopentone and succinylcholine and the operation continued. Cardiovascular support was provided by the administration of ephedrine injected intermittently intravenously. The spinal block receded and the patients were able to return to the ward without any further complications. All three mothers remain in good health and do not regret having had spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. In contrast to previously reported cases of high spinal anaesthesia following unsuccessful epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section, this report describes 3 cases of high spinal following the administration of spinal anaesthesia upon an ongoing epidural infusion of local anaesthetic during labour. As no guidelines are available as to the recommended dose of spinal anaesthetic under such circumstances and, in view of the several case reports describing a similar complication under different circumstances, we suggest that spinal anaesthesia is contraindicated upon ongoing epidural analgesia or following a failed epidural.     

Epidural versus general anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section Effect on Apgar score and acid-base status of the newborn

Elective Caesarean section deliveries over a 5-year period were studied to compare the effect of epidural block with general anaesthesia on the condition of the infant at birth. The Apgar score and umbilical arterial acid-base status were used as determinants of the latter. Epidural block was used in 139 (22.8%) mothers while 471 (77.2%) were performed under general anaesthesia. No babies in the epidural group were severely depressed (Apgar less than 4), compared with 6.2% in the general anaesthesia group. Only 4.3% of the epidural sections were moderately depressed (Apgar 4-6), compared with 15.4% of the others. These differences remained highly significant when infants of less than 2500 g were excluded, and when matched groups were compared. Mean umbilical arterial pH was similar within the two groups (pH 7.28), and was not consistent with asphyxia in almost 90% of the depressed infants. The findings suggest that general anaesthesia, rather than asphyxia or aortocaval compression, is responsible for most of the depressed infants born by elective Caesarean section. This may involve over 20% of babies delivered in this manner, so greater use of epidural block for elective Caesarean section is recommended. Further investigations are required to improve results with general anaesthesia.     

Circulatory collapse following epidural bolus for Caesarean section a profound vasovagal reaction? A case report

IntroductionReduced blood pressure is commonly seen associated to spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section and efforts to reduce its occurrence and its magnitude is common practice. Cardiovascular collapse requiring cardio-pulmonary resuscitation after putting the spinal/epidural block for Caesarean section is however a rare but most dramatic event.Presentation of caseWe describe a case with sudden short loss of circulation, circulatory collapse, short after start of emergency Caesarean section in top up epidural anaesthesia (3 + 12 ml ropivaciane 7.5 mg/ml), requiring CPR. The neonate was delivered during CPR with Apgar 1, 10, 10 at 1, 5 and 10 min. Circulation was restored following 60–90 s of CPR and administration of 0.5 mg adrenaline. No cardioversion was administered sinus rhythm was regained spontaneously. The mother and child had a further uncomplicated course. No signs of cardiac damage/anomaly, emboli, septicaemia, pereclampisa or local anaesthetic toxicity was found. The patient had prior to the decision about Caesarean section had fever and was subsequently relatively dehydrated.DiscussionThe patient had a fast return of sinus rhythm following birth of the child, without cardioversion. None of common causes for cardiac arrest was found and the patient an uncomplicated post Caesarean section course. The combination of epidural induced sympathetic block and reduced preload possibly triggered a Bezold-Jarisch reflex with a profound vasovagal reaction.ConcluiosnA structured plan for the handling of cardiovascular crisis must be available wherever Caesarean section are performed. Adequate volume loading, left tilt and vigilant control of circulation following regional block performance is of outmost importance.     

Paraesthesia during the needle-through-needle and the double segment technique for combined spinal epidural anaesthesia

Paraesthesia during regional anaesthesia is an unpleasant sensation for patients and, more importantly, in some cases it is related to neurological injury. Relatively few studies have been conducted on the frequency of paraesthesia during combined spinal epidural anaesthesia. We compared two combined spinal epidural anaesthesia techniques: the needle-through-needle technique and the double segment technique in this respect. We randomly allocated 116 parturients undergoing elective Caesarean section to receive anaesthesia using one of these techniques. Both techniques were performed using a 27G pencil point needle, an 18G Tuohy needle, and a 20G multiport epidural catheter from the same manufacturer. The overall frequency of paraesthesia was higher in the needle-through-needle technique group (56.9% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.011). The frequency of paraesthesia at spinal needle insertion was 20.7% in the needle-through-needle technique group and 8.8% in the double segment technique group; whereas the frequency of paraesthesia at epidural catheter insertion was 46.6% in the needle-through-needle technique group and 24.6% in the double segment technique group.     

An evaluation of a 30-gauge needle for spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section

A 30-gauge spinal needle was evaluated for Caesarean section, using a combined epidural/spinal technique, in 50 mothers. Spinal anaesthesia failed in six mothers and was inadequate in another six. General anaesthesia was required on one occasion. A 25% overall failure rate suggests that a 30-gauge needle is not a practical proposition for routine clinical practice.     

Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia in a primigravida with valvular heart disease

Purpose

This is the first report describing combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for labour and unexpected Caesarean section in a patient with mitral and aortic stenosis and insufficiency.

Clinical features

The patient was a 30-yr-old GIPO with a history of rheumatic fever. She had moderate stenosis and insufficiency of the mitral and aortic valves. Combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia was used throughout labour and subsequent Caesarean section. The patient remained haemodynamically stable throughout the procedure.

Conclusion

Carefully planned regional anaesthesia was safely used for labour and operative delivery in this parturient with mitral and aortic valvular disease.     

Regional anaesthesia and cough effectiveness

We report the results of a study of the effects of spinal and epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section on commonly used indicators of a patient's ability to cough effectively. Both spinal and epidural anaesthesia, after the achievement of a block adequate for surgery, were associated with statistically significant decreases (p less than 0.05) in all the respiratory variables recorded: forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second, peak expiratory flow rate and maximum expiratory pressure. We conclude that although the observed changes are unlikely to impair the normal patient's ability to cough effectively in these circumstances, there may be clinically significant impairment in the presence of an inadvertently high block or in a patient with pre-existing pulmonary disease.     

Low-dose combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia vs. conventional epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section in pre-eclampsia: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Epidural anaesthesia is the preferred technique of anaesthesia for Caesarean section in pre-eclampsia. Spinal anaesthesia is considered by some as a safe and effective alternative, which is especially useful in emergency situations. Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia, using low doses of local anaesthetics with opioids, is effective and reduces the incidence of hypotension in normal pregnancy. We performed a retrospective chart analysis to evaluate the effects of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia on maternal haemodynamics and fetal outcome compared to conventional epidural anaesthesia. METHODS: A retrospective anaesthesia chart analysis of all pre-eclamptic patients who underwent Caesarean section over a 4 yr period was performed. Patient characteristic, obstetric, haemodynamic, fetal and neonatal data were gathered and analysed according to the anaesthetic technique used. RESULTS: Seventy-seven pre-eclamptic parturients undergoing Caesarean section were identified (26 women were severely pre-eclamptic and 51 demonstrated mild pre-eclampsia). Epidural anaesthesia was performed in 62 patients and combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia was performed in 15. No differences in patient characteristic and obstetric data were noted. Highest mean arterial pressure prior to anaesthesia was comparable between the groups (epidural: 106 +/- 12 vs. combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia: 109 +/- 18 mmHg) as well as the lowest recorded mean arterial pressure following anaesthesia (epidural: 93 +/- 13 vs. combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia: 98 +/- 17 mmHg). In the combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia group more ephedrine was used compared to the epidural group (14.6 +/- 4.4 vs. 3.6 +/- 4.6 mg, P < 0.05). However, more lactated Ringer's was used in the epidural group. Umbilical artery pH was lower in the epidural group (7.26 +/- 0.01 vs. 7.29 +/- 0.02, P < 0.05). Similar results were noted in 26 severely pre-eclamptic patients. Seven women underwent combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia and 19 underwent epidural anaesthesia in the severely pre-eclamptic group. Also more ephedrine was used in the combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia group. A tendency towards a lower umbilical artery pH was observed in the epidural group but this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia appears to be safe as anaesthetic technique for pre-eclampsia and severe pre-eclampsia. However, it is important to consider the retrospective design of the study and the large number of epidural anaesthetics performed.     

Anaesthesia in a gravid achondroplastic dwarf

A patient with achondroplasia presented for elective Caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. A block from C5 to S4 developed over 20 minutes after 12 ml plain bupivacaine 0.5%. This case serves to highlight the difficulties of regional anaesthesia in the gravid achondroplastic dwarf.     

Von Hippel-Lindau disease and obstetric anaesthesia: 3 cases report

Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder with retinal and nervous system haemangioblastomas, phaeochromocytomia, kidney, pancreas and endolymphatic tumors. The management of childbirth, including epidural anaesthesia is controversial. The possible presence of vascular malformations (retinal and central nervous system and spinal haemangioblastomas) increases the risk of disrupting central nervous system haemangioblastoma during delivery and when epidural anaesthesia is initiated. We report 3 cases of patient with VHL disease with successful epidural anaesthesia 2 for delivery and 1 for Caesarean section.     

Accidental total spinal block: A complication of an epidural test dose

A case is presented of a 36-yr-old parturient who developed a total spinal block after an epidural test dose. After placement of an epidural catheter and confirming negative aspiration for blood or CSF, 3 ml lidocaine 1.5% (45 mg), with 1:200,000 epinephrine (15 micrograms) was injected via the catheter over 30 sec. Within two minutes the patient developed hypotension and extensive sensory and motor block including respiratory paralysis and aphonia. She remained fully conscious and alert and spontaneous respiration recommenced in five minutes. A live healthy infant was delivered by emergency Caesarean section shortly afterwards under general anaesthesia and the mother recovered completely without any untoward sequelae.     

Obstetrical anaesthesia in Ontario

The purpose of this study was to determine the availability of regional anaesthesia for Caesarean section, of epidural opioids and patient-controlled analgesia after Caesarean section, and of epidural and other forms of analgesia in labour. A mail survey was sent to the “Head Nurse, Department of Obstetrics” at each of the 142 hospitals in Ontario with designated obstetric beds. Responses were obtained from 100% of hospitals. For Caesarean Section, general anaesthesia was used in all hospitals, and was the only option in seven. Epidural anaesthesia was used in 93% of hospitals, and spinal anaesthesia in 48%. Postoperatively, patient-controlled analgesia was used in 31% of hospitals and spinal opioids in 28%. In 66 hospitals, im or iv opioids were the only types of analgesia available. For analgesia in labour, im or iv opioids were used in 96% of hospitals, nitrous oxide was used in 75%, epidural analgesia in 75%, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in 52% and patient-controlled analgesia in 10%. The overall epidural rate was 38%. Although the average rate in the 73 hospitals with fewer than 500 births per year was only 6% 14 large hospitals had an epidural rate of 60% or higher. It is concluded that regional techniques for peripartum analgesia have been widely accepted. Analgesia after Caesarean section could be improved. Epidural analgesia should be more widely available, especially in the many small hospitals in Ontario.