Which media are most likely to solve the archival problem?

The clinical application of quantitative methods for coronary arteriography remains limited, due in large part to the absence of a suitable replacement for cinefilm as the procedure record. The extension to the clinical environment of the validated objective methods which have found such widespread acceptance in clinical research studies is difficult to implement if the time-consuming and variable process for digitization of selected cinefilm frames is required. In addition, the complete integration of the angiographic procedure record with other patient records and procedures stored in a digital data format requires that the angiographic data eventually be converted to a digital format as well. Replacement of cinefilm requires that the media chosen for the task provide at least the same capabilities and preferably improved functions as those provided by cinefilm as a display, transport, and archival media. The demanding set of requirements imposed on the replacement options include high capacity, high acquisition rate, high transfer rate, application in a distributed environment, portability between institutions, and low expense. A true digital solution should also provide immediate access to the results of the angiographic procedure, transfer of image data over digital networks, multiple-user viewing capability, and quantitative analysis on a routine basis for all patients. In fact, a single media may not provide all the capabilities listed above but, rather, different media may need to be used for specialized tasks, i.e. the solution for archival may not be the same that will be employed as the portable patient record. Separation of the archival function from the acquisition/display and portable transfer functions increases the likelihood that cinefilm can be replaced in the imminent future by reducing the demands on a single media. Among the archival options available today are: (1) magnetic disks; (2) analog laser optical disks; (3) digital laser optical disks; (4) digital file-based magnetic tape; (5) digital video magnetic tape. In evaluating each of these alternatives, an accounting is required of how each meets the archival requirements along with an approximate breakdown of cost and readiness for implementation as a clinical solution today.     

Changing acute pain management to improve patient outcomes: an educational approach

The United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Acute Pain Management Guidelines were written to provide a scientific basis for practice. Educational programs designed to promote use of the guidelines may change practice in community hospitals. This article describes the development and implementation of an education program for nurses, physicians, and pharmacists in six community hospitals. Program content addressing the use of continuous quality improvement (CQI) teams, detailed pain histories, application of algorithms and dose calculation is described; direct and indirect outcome measures are reviewed. Six months after the program, all three experimental sites reported use of the AHCPR Guidelines in practice. Nurses reported that assessment and documentation of patients' duration of pain were perceived to be the most important caregiver behaviors providing benefit to patients: Across all respondents' reports of regularly performed activities, the activity performed by the largest proportion was assessing and documenting pain using a 0-10 rating scale.     

Cancer pain management. Basic therapy and treatment of breakthrough pain

Cancer pain imposes a great burden on patients and results in considerable constraints limiting their quality of life. The basic treatment for chronic pain consists in oral administration of long-acting preparations of various analgesic agents according to a set schedule. In addition to chronic pain, however, about 60% of cancer patients also suffer from breakthrough pain. Rapid-onset and short-acting preparations of highly potent opioids are available for the management of these attacks. To choose the correct analgesic agent, it is essential to take a comprehensive medical history and be aware of the different forms of pain present.     

Adjustment to chronic pain in back pain patients classified according to the motivational stages of chronic pain management.

According to Prochaska's transtheoretical model, the Freiburg Questionnaire stages of chronic pain management (FQ-STAPM) were used to classify chronic back patients into 4 distinct motivational stages. The FQ-STAMP was completed by 163 chronic back pain patients. Pain chronicity was measured by the Mainz Pain Staging System; pain intensity was measured by the numeric rating scale. Healthcare system expenses were considered as number of consulted physicians, number of stays in hospital, and number of rehabilitation programs. As psychometric tests, the lower pain disability index (PDI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and a quality of life score (SF36) were used. Patients were in the following motivational stages: precontemplation in 30%, preparation in 19%, action in 30%, maintenance in 21%. The intensity of pain in the precontemplation stage patients was significantly higher compared to patients in the maintenance stage. A lower pain chronicity was related to a significantly higher motivation. Moreover, there was a significant increase in healthcare system expenses by the lesser motivated patients. Patients in the maintenance stage used significantly less opioids than patients in the precontemplation stage. The higher motivated patients had a significantly lower PDI, a significantly lower HADS, and a significantly higher quality of life compared to less motivated patients. PERSPECTIVE: The study indicates that the FQ-STAPM might be a useful tool to classify chronic back pain patients and to work out a strategy together with the patient relevant to the outcome of pain management among chronic back pain patients.