Computer-automated dementia screening using a touch-tone telephone.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the sensitivity and specificity of a computer-automated telephone system to evaluate cognitive impairment in elderly callers to identify signs of early dementia. METHODS: The Clinical Dementia Rating Scale was used to assess 155 subjects aged 56 to 93 years (n = 74, 27, 42, and 12, with a Clinical Dementia Rating Scale score of 0, 0.5, 1, and 2, respectively). These subjects performed a battery of tests administered by an interactive voice response system using standard Touch-Tone telephones. Seventy-four collateral informants also completed an interactive voice response version of the Symptoms of Dementia Screener. RESULTS: Sixteen cognitively impaired subjects were unable to complete the telephone call. Performances on 6 of 8 tasks were significantly influenced by Clinical Dementia Rating Scale status. The mean (SD) call length was 12 minutes 27 seconds (2 minutes 32 seconds). A subsample (n = 116) was analyzed using machine-learning methods, producing a scoring algorithm that combined performances across 4 tasks. Results indicated a potential sensitivity of 82.0% and specificity of 85.5%. The scoring model generalized to a validation subsample (n = 39), producing 85.0% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity. The kappa agreement between predicted and actual group membership was 0.64 (P<.001). Of the 16 subjects unable to complete the call, 11 provided sufficient information to permit us to classify them as impaired. Standard scoring of the interactive voice response-administered Symptoms of Dementia Screener (completed by informants) produced a screening sensitivity of 63.5% and 100% specificity. A lower criterion found a 90.4% sensitivity, without lowering specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-automated telephone screening for early dementia using either informant or direct assessment is feasible. Such systems could provide wide-scale, cost-effective screening, education, and referral services to patients and caregivers.     

老年人认知功能减退知情者问卷检测老年人认知功能损害

目的评价老年人认知功能减退知情者问卷在中国老年人群中应用的信效度,以及在认知功能损害筛查中的有效性。方法认知功能损害患者93例,应用简短版本的老年人认知功能减退知情者问卷(IQCODE)对其知情者进行问卷调查。对128名60岁以上来自于社区的健康老年人的知情者进行调查,作问卷的信效度检验。结果 IQCODE 内部一致性系数达0.83。重测信度Pearson 相关系数为0.86。与简短精神状态量表(MMSE)、日常生活活动能力量表(ADL)的效度系数分别为-0.78和0.71。IQCODE 得分在轻度认知障碍和轻、中、重度痴呆患者中分别为(3.5±0.4)分和、(4.2±0.4)分、(4.7±0.2)分和(4.9±0.2)分,差异有统计学意义,但在阿尔茨海默病(AD)和血管性痴呆(VaD)等不同痴呆病因组间差异无统计学意义。结论 IQCODE 信效度良好。得分与病情严重程度密切相关,此问卷能将痴呆和轻度认知功能损害患者与健康人群很好地区分开来,可用于认知功能损害的检测。但对 AD、VaD 等痴呆类型的鉴别作用有限。     

The GPcog for detecting a population with a high risk of dementia

GPcog is a screening tool for dementia in the aged. It consists of nine cognitive items and six items assessing the daily living instrumental activities by an informal carer. This study was aimed to assess the reliability of the French version of the GPcog in a psychogeriatric population. Two hundred and eighty inpatients from a short-term psychogeriatric ward, with or without dementia, were examined. Scores on GPcog, MMSE and on a five-word memory test for screening dementia were compared to the final diagnosis of dementia. The mean age of subjects was 77.8+/-7.0 years for males (n=116), and of 80.3+/-6.6 years for females (n=164). One hundred eighty two patients had dementia, mainly of Alzheimer's type, and 98 had psychiatric disorders but were non demented. GPcog sensitivity for the diagnosis of dementia was 96%, specificity 62%, positive predictive value 83% and negative predictive value 90%. GPcog is an accurate and well-accepted instrument for dementia screening in primary care. French results were similar to those obtained with the English version. It can be easily used by non-specialized carers.     

Instrumental activities of daily living as a screening tool for cognitive impairment and dementia in elderly community dwellers.

OBJECTIVE: To identify which Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) are related to cognitive impairment, independent of age, sex, and education; to assess the performance of an IADL score using these items in screening for cognitive impairment and dementia in elderly community dwellers. DESIGN: Survey based on the baseline interview of the PAQUID study on functional and cerebral aging. SETTING: Community survey in 37 randomly selected parishes in Gironde, France. SUBJECTS: Random sample of 2,792 community dwellers aged 65 and over (participation rate: 69%). MEASUREMENTS: Two-phase screening: (1) functional assessment, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and DSM-III criteria for dementia; (2) in DSM-III-positive patients, NINCDS-ADRDA criteria applied by a neurologist. Functional assessment: IADL scale of Lawton and Brody. Criterion standards: cognitive impairment: MMSE score lower than 24; dementia: DSM-III and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. RESULTS: Four IADL items are correlated with cognitive impairment independent of age, sex, and education: telephone use, use of means of transportation, responsibility for medication intake, and handling finances. A score adding the number of IADL dependencies has a sensitivity of 0.62 and a specificity of 0.80 at the lowest cut-off point (score > 0) for the diagnosis of cognitive impairment. The same score at the same cut-off has a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.71 for the diagnosis of dementia. The prevalence of dementia (2.4%) is reduced by a factor of 12 in subjects independent for the four IADL. CONCLUSION: The four IADL score could be incorporated into the screening procedure for dementia in elderly community dwellers.     

The GPCOG: a new screening test for dementia designed for general practice

OBJECTIVES: To design and test a brief, efficient dementia-screening instrument for use by general practitioners (GPs). DESIGN: The General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) consists of cognitive test items and historical questions asked of an informant. The validity of the measure was assessed by comparison with the criterion standard of diagnoses of dementia derived from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition). SETTING: Primary care doctors' offices. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-seven GPs administered the GPCOG to 283 community-dwelling patients aged 50 to 74 with memory complaints or aged 75 and older. MEASUREMENTS: The Cambridge Mental Disorder of the Elderly Examination, the Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, and the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey. RESULTS: The GPCOG was reliable and superior to the AMT (and possibly to the MMSE) in detecting dementia. The two-stage method of administering the GPCOG (cognitive testing followed by informant questions if necessary)had a sensitivity of 0.85, a specificity of 0.86, a misclassification rate of 14%, and positive predictive value of 71.4%. Patient interviews took less than 4 minutes to administer and informant interviews less than 2 minutes. The instrument was reported by GPs to be practical to administer and was acceptable to patients. CONCLUSION: The GPCOG is a valid, efficient, well-accepted instrument for dementia screening in primary care.     

Validity of the telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS) and modified TICS (TICSm) for mild cognitive imparment (MCI) and dementia screening

This study aimed to validate the TICS and modified TICS (TICSm) in Korean elderly population and to compare MCI and dementia screening ability between TICS and TICSm. TICS and TICSm were administered to 70 cognitively normal (CN), 75 MCI, and 85 dementia subjects, with mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and other cognitive and functional measures. TICS and TICSm scores were highly correlated with other global cognitive and functional scores. The CN vs. dementia discrimination ability of both instruments was as excellent as that of MMSE (sensitivity/specificity at optimal cutoff: 87.1/90.1 for TICS; 88.2/90.0 for TICSm). Although their CN vs. MCI discrimination performances were comparable to that of MMSE, they were far from perfect (sensitivity/specificity: 69.3/68.6 for TICS; 73.3/67.1 for TICSm). There was no significant difference in dementia or MCI screening accuracy between TICS and TICSm. Both of them also showed high test-retest reliability. Our findings indicate that TICS and TICSm are reliable and as valid as MMSE in regard of screening cognitively impaired elderly. In terms of the comparison between TICSm and TICS, however, TICSm has little advantage over TICS for screening dementia and even MCI, in spite of longer administration time and more efforts required.     

Sensitivity and specificity of cognitive and functional screening instruments for dementia: the Indo-U.S. Dementia Epidemiology Study

There is a shortage of adequate screening instruments for dementia in poorly educated populations and non-English-speaking groups. An epidemiological survey was conducted in a population-based, largely illiterate, sample of 5,126 individuals aged 55 and older in 28 villages in the rural community of Ballabgarh in northern India. All participants were administered a general mental status test, the Hindi Mental State Examination (HMSE), and a brief battery of neuropsychological tests. Their informants answered a questionnaire assessing functional ability, the Everyday Abilities Scale for India (EASI). Six hundred thirty-two participants underwent clinical diagnostic evaluation for dementia. We investigated whether the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for dementia of the mental status test could be improved by the addition of the brief neuropsychological test battery or the functional questionnaire, comparing the instruments alone and in combination. In participants who could be tested cognitively, the HMSE, the neuropsychological battery, and EASI had sensitivities of 81.3%, 81.3%, and 62.5%, respectively, with specificities of 60.2%, 74.5%, and 89.7%, respectively. The combination of all three was 93.8% sensitive and 41.8% specific. The sensitivity of the HMSE alone was nonsignificantly improved by the addition of either the EASI or the neuropsychological battery, whereas its specificity was significantly decreased by either addition. An advantage of the EASI was that it could also be administered to informants of subjects who were cognitively untestable. In this largely illiterate community, with a low prevalence of dementia, the combination of cognitive tests and a functional ability questionnaire had substantial value for population screening.     

Development and validation of a brief observer-rated screening scale for depression in elderly medical patients

OBJECTIVE: to develop a depression screening scale that does not rely on verbal communication. SETTING: an acute geriatric unit in a teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: 96 patients (mean age 81 years, range 68-92, 59 women); 40% of the initial study group of 50 and 22% of the validation group of 46 were diagnosed as depressed. METHODS: we devised a scale using nine items which could be rated by an observer; we determined inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for each item compared with a Geriatric Mental State-AGECAT diagnosis of depression; we validated a final scale of six items. RESULTS: inter-rater reliability was poor for two items (irritability and sleep disturbance) while two items (sleep disturbance and night sedation) had poor sensitivity; we omitted these items in a revised scale. Re-analysis of data from the initial study showed that a cut-off of > or = 3 on the revised scale gave a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 0.89 and a negative predictive value of 0.90. Spearman's correlation coefficient between the six-item questionnaire and the Hamilton rating scale was 0.79. In the validation study, the cut-off score of > or = 3 on the revised six-item scale had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 72%, a positive predictive value of 0.69 and a negative predictive value of 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: this simple, short, observation-based screening scale completed by nurses is sensitive and specific in identifying depression in elderly medically ill patients, and may be a useful addition to clinical practice.     

Informant ratings of cognitive decline of elderly people: relationship to longitudinal change on cognitive tests

Formal assessment of cognitive decline with cognitive tests can be difficult, requiring either two measurement points or a comparison of 'hold' with 'don't hold' tests. Informant-based assessment provides an alternative approach because informants can adopt a longitudinal perspective and directly rate cognitive change. A study was carried out to assess the validity of informant ratings collected by means of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE). A community sample of 500 subjects aged 74 or over underwent four cognitive tests on two occasions 3½ years apart. On the second occasion, informants filled out the IQCODE. Subjects rated as having moderate or severe decline were found to have greater change on the cognitive tests. These findings support the validity of informant ratings of cognitive decline.     

Asking family about memory loss

OBJECTIVE: To compare a family informant's report of memory loss in an older family member to standardized clinical diagnoses of cognitive impairment. SETTING: Duke Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly (EPESE), a 10-year longitudinal study of community dwellers aged 65 and greater in five counties of North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: A stratified random sample of potentially demented participants was selected from the second wave of the Duke EPESE using responses to a brief cognitive screen. A neuropsychological battery was administered to these participants, and their family informants were asked whether they recognized memory loss in the participant. One hundred fifty-seven participants completed the full evaluation and also had an available family informant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Family informant's report of memory loss (yes, no, sometimes) compared to expert consensus diagnosis of cognitive impairment or dementia. RESULTS: There was poor concordance between the clinical diagnoses of cognitive impairment or dementia and the family informant's recognition of memory loss (kappa=-0.05; P=.74). When informants reported memory loss, 30% of participants were found not to have a cognitive loss. Among participants in whom family informants reported no memory loss, 75% were diagnosed with dementia or cognitive impairment (sensitivity, 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.78; specificity, 0.24, 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.40; positive predictive value, 70%; negative predictive value, 25%). CONCLUSIONS: Asking family members about memory loss in a patient may be an unreliable strategy to detect dementia.     

A screening instrument for a Sicilian neuroepidemiological survey in the elderly

We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a screening instrument developed for use in a two-phase neuroepidemiological survey in Sicily. The Sicilian Epidemiological Dementia Study (SEDES) project will evaluate the prevalence and incidence of dementia, parkinsonisms and essential tremor in four Sicilian municipalities. It is a two-phase door-to-door survey. To identify subjects with possible neurological disorders, in this study, we developed a screening instrument including a symptoms questionnaire and simple physical tasks for parkinsonisms and essential tremor. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was chosen for screening dementia. The symptoms questionnaire and simple tasks developed to identify possible patients with parkinsonism and essential tremor, was tested in a hospital setting. To evaluate sensitivity, we selected 20 patients with essential tremor and 40 with Parkinson's disease (20 with Stages I-II and 20 with Stages III-V) [Neurology 17 (1967) 427]. To evaluate specificity we also selected 20 healthy subjects. The screening instrument was administered in a hospital setting by trained interviewers. Sensitivity of the screening instrument (questionnaire plus simple tasks) was 100% for essential tremor and parkinsonisms regardless of the stage. Specificity of the instrument was 90% (95% CI 66.9-98.2); the predictive positive value was 90.9%, while the negative predictive value was 100%. Even if validity was assessed in a hospital setting, the high sensitivity and specificity obtained suggest that the instrument could be an appropriate screening tool for parkinsonisms and essential tremor in a two-phase neuroepidemiological survey.     

Diagnosing dementia. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the mental status examination

Investigators have reported poor recognition of dementia by primary physicians. For this reason, mental status examinations were performed on 72 demented and 144 nondemented medical inpatients to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of components of this examination in the diagnosis of dementia. Sensitivity of individual level-of-orientation items was low (15.3 to 56.9%), though specificity was high (91.7 to 100%). Sensitivity of several nonorientation items was high (80.6 to 100%), though specificity was low. A multivariate discriminant equation using both orientation and nonorientation items achieved high sensitivity (89.6% test cases, 87.5% validation cases) and specificity (78.1% test cases, 87.5% validation cases). Adding the easily obtained patient characteristic of age to the equation further increased sensitivity (95.8%, 91.3%), while maintaining specificity (82.3%, 85.4%). From these results, it is concluded that the level-of-orientation screening examination used by clinicians to detect dementia is unacceptably insensitive. In contrast, a composite decision rule including nonorientation items achieves high sensitivity with relatively high specificity.     

Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although the prognosis for pancreatic cancer is generally poor, it is well known that the survival rate for resected pancreatic cancer is much higher than that for more conservative treatment. The importance of early detection is emphasized for resection of pancreatic cancer. Measurement of serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 has shown satisfactory sensitivity and predictive value in symptomatic patients, but no available data has been found on healthy asymptomatic subjects. Thus, the authors aimed to determine the clinical usefulness of CA 19-9 as a screening tool for pancreatic cancer in asymptomatic subjects. METHODS: From December 1994 to November 2000, 70 940 asymptomatic persons visiting the Health Promotion Center at the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, participated. All subjects underwent abdominal ultrasonography and serum CA 19-9 measurement. The authors analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of CA 19-9 for detecting pancreatic cancer. Also, those subjects who had a serum CA 19-9 level above the cut-off value were followed up using a serial check of CA 19-9, computed tomography, or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. RESULTS: The number of subjects with a level of CA 19-9 above the cutoff of 37 U/mL was 1063 (1.5%), including four cases diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. The prevalence of pancreatic cancer over the age of 30 years is 13.66 per 100 000 population in Korea. Therefore, the sensitivity is 100% and the specificity 98.5%. However, the positive predictive value of CA 19-9 for detecting pancreatic cancer is only 0.9% in the asymptomatic population. CONCLUSION: Mass screening for pancreatic cancer using CA 19-9 levels in asymptomatic subjects is ineffective because of a very low positive predictive value, despite its high sensitivity and specificity.     

Validity of a Brazilian version of the Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS) mental health screening questionnaire

A validity study of the Brazilian version of the 15-item Short Psychiatric Evaluation Schedule (SPES), included in the mental health assessment of Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS), designed to detect psychiatric disorders in the elderly, against the "caseness" criterion suggested by Cooper and Schwarz was carried out with a community sample, as part of a survey to study health and living conditions of the elderly in a large urban center of a developing country, S?o Paulo, Brazil. The screening questionnaire was completed by 292 subjects, and 91 were selected for the psychiatric interview. The validity coefficients were as follows: sensitivity 61%, specificity 89%, positive predictive value 66%, negative predictive value 87% and misclassification rate 18%. A discriminant analysis using a stepwise procedure was then applied to select the best item discriminators of the screening questionnaire. The best set of discrimination comprised six items leading to the following validity coefficients: sensitivity 82%, specificity 77%, positive predictive value 58%, negative predictive value 92% and misclassification rate 21%. The possible factors related to false positive and false negative responses on the screening are discussed.     

Early prediction of the need for non-routine discharge planning for the elderly

Successful home return from hospital admission is a key issue to provide quality healthcare in a society with numerous older subjects. Therefore, a screening method for early identification of patients who require intensive, non-routine discharge planning needs to be established. We have developed a 7-item screening sheet (the screening sheet at admission: SSA) and conducted a prospective cohort study to examine its usefulness in predicting the need for non-routine discharge planning. The SSA score yielded an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82. Moreover, a cutoff score of 2 or higher gave sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 0.82, 0.72, 0.13 and 0.99, respectively. A stepwise logistic regression model demonstrated that age of 75 years or more and impairment in basic activities of daily living (ADL) were significantly associated with requirement for non-routine discharge planning in surgical patients, while living alone or with a spouse aged 75 or older and readmission within 1 month were also significant predictors in medical patients. The SSA score may be useful in identifying patients who need further assessment and planning. While the four items were particularly important predictors, differences between medical and surgical patients should also be considered.     

Availability of knowledgeable informants for a psychological autopsy study of suicides committed by elderly people

Psychological autopsy methodology has not been applied in studies of elderly suicides, despite the fact that the elderly are associated with a higher rate of suicide than any other age group. One school of thought argues that older adults who die by suicide are socially isolated and/or estranged for a long period of time before death, so that knowledgeable informants are difficult or impossible to obtain. In the present retrospective study we examine the number and availability of knowledgeable informants for 145 older people who committed suicide. We believe that the ability to access several motivated informants per case is essential to any psychological autopsy study by modern standards. The stereotype of the "average expectable" elderly suicide victim as socially isolated and living alone or in an institutional setting was not supported by our findings; an unexpectedly high percentage of subjects were married at the time of their death. There was at least one knowledgeable informant in 90% of cases and two or more in almost 50%. In 46%, the subject had expressed despondency over illness. In a prospective study involving interviews with informants for eight subjects, all eight had at least two knowledgeable and willing informants. Two cases of the eight are presented to illustrate the role of delirium and an ominous diagnosis (cancer) as causes of suicide. We conclude that it is feasible to do a psychological autopsy study of elderly suicides.     

Development of a short neuropsychological battery to screen early dementia in the elderly

Background:   The purpose of the present study was to develop a short screening neuropsychological battery for patients with very mild and mild dementia.
Methods:   The participants involved in the present study consisted of 162 persons who were 65 years and older. Fifty-four of the patients had very mild or mild dementia and had a mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score of 19 or above. Normal control samples were community-dwelling volunteers, or persons recruited from outpatients who did not suffer from any cognitive problems. Mini-mental state examination, the category cued memory test (CCMT) – a modified brief memory test in which category cues were given for both acquisition and retrieval – verbal fluency test (VFT) and clock drawing test (CDT) were carried out. Using logistic regression models, the best battery was selected. The validity and reliability of the battery were also assessed.
Results:   The combination of CCMT, VFT and CDT was the best screening battery and could be accomplished in about 10 min. The battery had a high degree of sensitivity (94.4%), specificity (99.1%), positive and negative predictive values. Test-retest, interrater and alternate forms reliabilities were substantial using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and all of the P -values analyzed by the Pearson correlation coefficient were below 0.005.
Conclusions:   This short battery has enough validity, reliability and efficiency to detect early dementia especially in an elderly primary care setting. The CCMT is also a useful memory test even if used alone.     

Evaluation of a fecal occult blood test with reverse passive hemagglutination for colorectal neoplasm screening

AIM: To evaluate the one and three sampling reverse passive hemagglutination fecal occult blood test (RPHA FOBT) for colorectal neoplasm screening.METHODS: A group of 3034 individuals with histories of colorectal polyps and/or ulcers were screened for colorectal cancer. Three day fecal samples were collected and 60 cm fiberoptic colonoscopy was conducted for each subject. The fecal samples were tested for occult blood with the RPHA method and the endoscopic and histopathological diagnoses were used as standard reference for evaluation. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of different samplings were compared.RESULTS: About 521 cases of colorectal neoplasms were detected, including 12 cases of colorectal cancer and 509 cases of polyps. Results showed that the mean sensitivity of one sampling RPHA FOBT for colorectal neoplasm was only 13.2%, the specificity was 90.3% and the positive and negative predictive values were 21.3% and 83.4%, respectively; while for the three sampling, taking one positivity as positive, the sensitivity increased to 22.0%, the specificity decreased to 81.6% and the positive and negative predictive values were 19.7% and 83.6%, respectively.CONCLUSION: A single RPHA FOBT seems to be less sensitive for screening for colorectal neoplasms. Since it is convenient and economical, RPHA FOBT remains the most practical procedure for detection of early colorectal cancer and polyps if it is combined with other screening methods.     

A New Risk-Scoring System for Colorectal Cancer and Polyp Screening by Turkish Colorectal Cancer and Polyp Study Group

Background:Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed types of cancer worldwide. An early diagnosis and detection of colon cancer and polyp can reduce mortality and morbidity from colorectal cancer. Even though there are a variety of options in screening tests, the question remains on which test is the most effective for the early detection of colorectal cancer. In this prospective study, we aimed to develop a simple, useful, effective, and reliable scoring system to detect colon polyp and colorectal cancer.Methods:We enrolled 6508 subjects over the age of 18 from 16 centers, with colonoscopy screening. The age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, body mass index, polyp incidence, polyp size, number and localization, and pathologic findings were recorded.Results:The age, male gender, obesity, smoking, and family history were found as independent risk factors for adenomatous polyp. We have developed a new scoring system which can be used for these factors. With a score of 4 or above, we found the following: sensitivity 81%, specificity 40%, positive predictive value 25.68%, and negative predictive value 89.84%, for adenomatous polyp detection; and sensitivity 96%, specificity 39%, positive predictive value 3.35%, negative predictive value 99.29%, for colorectal cancer detection.Conclusion:Even though the first colorectal cancer screening worldwide is generally performed for individuals over 50 years of age, we recommend that screening for colorectal cancer might begin for those under 50 years of age as well. Individuals with a score ≥ 4 must be included in the screening tests for colorectal cancer.     

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment

OBJECTIVES: To develop a 10-minute cognitive screening tool (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA) to assist first-line physicians in detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a clinical state that often progresses to dementia. DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: A community clinic and an academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four patients meeting MCI clinical criteria supported by psychometric measures, 93 patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score > or =17), and 90 healthy elderly controls (NC). MEASUREMENTS: The MoCA and MMSE were administered to all participants, and sensitivity and specificity of both measures were assessed for detection of MCI and mild AD. RESULTS: Using a cutoff score 26, the MMSE had a sensitivity of 18% to detect MCI, whereas the MoCA detected 90% of MCI subjects. In the mild AD group, the MMSE had a sensitivity of 78%, whereas the MoCA detected 100%. Specificity was excellent for both MMSE and MoCA (100% and 87%, respectively). CONCLUSION: MCI as an entity is evolving and somewhat controversial. The MoCA is a brief cognitive screening tool with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting MCI as currently conceptualized in patients performing in the normal range on the MMSE.