Nocebo in fibromyalgia: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials and implications for practice

Background: Nocebo refers to adverse effects (AEs) generated by negative expectations that medical treatment will likely harm instead of heal and can be assessed in placebo‐controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We examined AEs following placebo administration in RCTs for fibromyalgia (FM), a condition characterized by patients’ poor medication adherence, which may affect outcome and/or increase healthcare costs. Methods: Following a systematic Medline search for RCTs for FM pharmacologic treatment published between 2001 and 2010, we assessed percentages of placebo‐treated patients reporting at least one AE or discontinuing because of placebo intolerance and searched for factors influencing nocebo’s extent. Percentages were compared with those revealed by similar meta‐analyses of RCTs for multiple sclerosis and primary headaches. Results: Data were extracted from 16 RCTs fulfilling search criteria. Of 2026 placebo‐treated patients, 67.2% (95%CI: 51.0–81.5%) reported at least one AE, and 9.5% (95%CI: 8.3–10.9%) discontinued placebo treatment because of intolerance. AEs in placebo arms corresponded quantitatively and qualitatively to those in active drug arms (ρ > 0.88, P < 0.0001). Younger age and larger placebo arm size were associated with increased dropout rates. Patients with depression were more likely to withdraw from trials. Nocebo dropouts in FM trials were fourfold and twofold higher than in RCTs for multiple sclerosis treatment and migraine preventive treatment, respectively. Conclusions: Nocebo is remarkably prevalent in FM patients participating in RCTs. Because nocebo contributes to drug intolerance and treatment failure in clinical practice, identification of predisposing factors and efforts to prevent nocebo by educating these patients appropriately may be important for FM outcome.     

Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for treatment of depression in Alzheimer's disease: a metaanalysis.

OBJECTIVE: Depression in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is common (15% to 63%) and is associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality. Our objective was to quantitatively summarize the data on the efficacy and safety of antidepressant treatment for depression complicating AD. METHOD: We performed a metaanalysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants with a database search of the English literature (up to 2006) and a manual search of references in the retrieved articles. We extracted the proportion of subjects who responded and remitted, experienced adverse events (AEs), discontinued treatment due to AEs, or discontinued treatment for any reason. Cognition scores were also extracted. RESULTS: We included 5 studies, which involved 82 subjects treated with antidepressants and 83 subjects who received placebo treatment. Antidepressants were superior to placebo for both treatment response (odds ratio [OR] 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 5.16) and remission of depression (OR 2.75; 95% CI, 1.13 to 6.65). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for change in cognition (weighted mean difference -0.71, 95% CI, -3.20 to 1.79), overall dropouts (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.66) or dropout due to AEs (OR 1.41; 95% CI 0.36 to 5.54). The numbers needed to treat for one additional AD patient to respond to antidepressant treatment were 5 (95% CI, 3 to 59) and 5 (95% CI, 2 to 24) for remission of depression. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant treatment for depression in AD is efficacious, with rates of discontinuation that are comparable to placebo. Nonetheless, clinicians must be vigilant regarding the potential side effects of antidepressants in this population.     

Time course of adverse events most commonly associated with topiramate for migraine prevention

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of topiramate has been demonstrated in three large multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. To characterize the time course of adverse events (AEs) that led to treatment discontinuation in ≥2% of patients who received topiramate 100 mg/day during three pivotal, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and 26-week trials. The pooled population comprised all randomized patients who reported safety data during the double-blind phase (topiramate 100 mg/day, n  = 386; placebo n  = 372), which consisted of a 4-week titration period and a 22-week maintenance period. Incidence, time to onset, and cumulative mean rate of AEs were assessed. Overall, AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 24.9% of patients receiving topiramate 100 mg/day and 11.0% receiving placebo ( P  < 0.001). AEs leading to discontinuation during the double-blind phase in ≥2% of patients included paresthesia (8.0% discontinued), any cognitive symptoms (7.3% discontinued), fatigue (4.7% discontinued), insomnia (3.4% discontinued), nausea (2.3% discontinued), loss of appetite, anxiety, and dizziness (2.1% discontinued because each AE). Most AEs began during the titration period. Paresthesia, any cognitive symptoms, nausea, and loss of appetite occurred at a higher rate in the topiramate group than in the placebo group ( P  < 0.01). AEs leading to discontinuation of topiramate are probably to occur during dose titration. If a patient has not experienced one of these AEs within the first 6 weeks of initiating topiramate 100 mg/day, these AEs are unlikely to occur.     

The adverse event profile of lacosamide: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose: Defining the tolerability and safety profile of recently marketed antiepileptic drugs, such as lacosamide (LCM), is a prerequisite for their optimal utilization in clinical practice. We aimed to identify any adverse event (AE) associated with LCM treatment by conducting a systematic review and meta‐analysis of all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We also evaluated the association of serious AEs with LCM, the proportion of study withdrawals due to intolerable AEs at different LCM doses, and whether the tolerability profile of LCM differs according to the disorder in which it was investigated. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL to May 2011 for LCM RCTs. Additional studies were identified from reference lists of retrieved papers and from online clinical databases. We selected placebo‐controlled, double‐blind RCTs and investigated the therapeutic effects of oral LCM in adults with any condition. AEs were assessed for their association with LCM after identification/exclusion of synonyms, rare AEs, and non‐assessable AEs. We used risk differences to evaluate the association of any (99% confidence intervals [CIs]) or serious AEs (95% CIs) with LCM and to investigate dose–response relationships of identified AEs. Key Findings: Ten RCTs (three in pharmacoresistant epilepsy, four in neuropathic pain, one in migraine, one in fibromyalgia, and one in knee osteoarthritis) were included in our study. Their duration varied from 12–18 weeks. The total number of patients included was 3,148. No serious AE was significantly associated with LCM treatment. Of 21 identified AEs, 11 (52%) were found to be significantly associated with LCM. The number of AEs significantly associated with LCM increased with increasing dose: one at 200 mg/day (dizziness); six at 400 mg/day (dizziness, vertigo, abnormal coordination, abnormal vision, nausea, and vomiting); nine at 600 mg/day (dizziness, vertigo, ataxia, balance disorder, diplopia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and tremor). The proportion of AE‐related study withdrawals also significantly increased with increasing dose. LCM AEs tended to occur more frequently in patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy compared with patients with other disorders. Significance: A range of AEs suggestive of vestibulocerebellar dysfunction is significantly associated with LCM treatment and their incidence increases with increasing doses.     

An international, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of paroxetine in adolescents with major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of paroxetine in adolescents with unipolar major depression. METHOD: Two hundred eighty-six (286) adolescents with unipolar major depression were randomly assigned to receive either paroxetine or placebo for 12 weeks. RESULTS: The proportion of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) responders (at least 50% reduction from baseline) for paroxetine and placebo were similar and not statistically different at endpoint (p = 0.702). A similar result was obtained for change from baseline on the Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School- Age Children (K-SADS-L) depression subscale. Among secondary endpoints, only a significantly higher Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) response rate was reported in paroxetine-treated patients versus placebo (69.2% versus 57.3%; p = 0.045). In general, results differed by age, with patients older than 16 years demonstrating a greater response to active treatment. This age group also reported more adverse experiences (AEs) relative to placebo than younger adolescents. Overall, paroxetine was generally well tolerated (11% discontinued owing to an AE versus 7% of placebo-treated patients). A post hoc analysis of AEs related to suicidal behavior suggested a greater incidence of these events for paroxetine than for placebo (4.4% versus 2.1%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio, 2.15, 95% Confidence Interval 0.45, 10.33; p = 0.502). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences were observed for paroxetine compared with placebo on the two prospectively defined primary efficacy variables. Paroxetine at 20-40 mg/day administered over a period of up to 12 weeks was generally well tolerated.     

Duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder

Since depression impacts all body systems, antidepressant treatments should relieve both the emotional and physical symptoms of depression. Duloxetine demonstrated antidepressant efficacy at a dose of 60 mg qd in two placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind studies and significantly improved remission rates compared with placebo. Duloxetine-treated patients had significant reduction in severity of the symptoms of depression as assessed by the HAM-D₁₇, anxious symptoms as measured by the HAM-A and quality of life measures compared to placebo. Duloxetine also improved somatic symptoms, particularly painful symptoms which may have contributed to significantly improved remission rates compared to placebo. Approximately 10% of the 1139 patients with major depressive disorder in placebo-controlled trials discontinued treatment due to an adverse event, compared to 4% of the 777 patients receiving placebo. In addition to nausea (1.4% incidence), which was the most common reason for discontinuation, dizziness, somnolence, and fatigue were the most common AEs reported as reasons for discontinuation and all were considered drug-related. Duloxetine treatment lacks effects on ECG, increases heart rate, and has little effect on blood pressure or weight.     

Reevaluating the role of antidepressants in cancer-related depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Prior reviews evaluating the role of antidepressants in cancer-related depression have drawn conflicting conclusions. These reviews have also not explored differences in efficacy and tolerability between antidepressants. We conducted a meta-analysis to address these limitations.

Method

We searched Medline (1948–2013), the Cochrane Library (1800–2013), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1986–2013), ClinicalTrials.gov (2013) and meeting abstracts. We included randomized trials comparing antidepressants to placebo or no treatment for cancer-related depression. We used random effects to calculate standardized mean differences (SMD).

Results

Of 5178 potentially eligible citations, 9 trials (1169 subjects) met inclusion criteria. Trials of mianserin found a robust reduction in depression scores at ≥ 4 weeks of treatment (SMD: 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24–0.95). Similar, but less robust, results were observed with paroxetine (SMD: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.01–0.42) and fluoxetine (SMD 0.34, 95% CI: 0.02–0.66). Conversely, there was no advantage with amitriptyline or desipramine. Compared to placebo, the odds of dropping out due to side effect were higher with fluoxetine and paroxetine and lower with mianserin. Methodological quality was moderate.

Conclusions

Paroxetine, fluoxetine and mianserin improve cancer-related depression but may vary in efficacy and tolerability. High-quality, randomized trials of newer antidepressant agents are needed to identify optimal treatments for managing cancer-related depression.     

Vortioxetine: a meta-analysis of 12 short-term,randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials for the treatment of major depressive disorder

BackgroundVortioxetine was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in September 2013 for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). Thus far, a number of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of vortioxetine have been conducted in patients with MDD. We performed a meta-analysis to increase the statistical power of these studies and enhance our current understanding of the role of vortioxetine in the treatment of MDD.MethodsWe performed an extensive search of databases and the clinical trial registry. The mean change in total scores on the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from the baseline were the primary outcome measures. The secondary efficacy measures were the response and remission rates, as defined by a 50% or greater reduction in HAM-D/MADRS total scores and as a score of 10 or less in the MADRS and 7 or less in the HAM-D total scores at the end of treatment.ResultsWe included 7 published and 5 unpublished short-term (6–12 wk) RCTs in our meta-analysis. Vortioxetine was significantly more effective than placebo, with an effect size (standardized mean difference [SMD]) of −0.217 (95% confidence interval [CI] −0.313 to −0.122) and with odds ratios (ORs) for response and remission of 1.652 (95% CI 1.321 to 2.067) and 1.399 (95% CI 1.104 to 1.773), respectively. Those treated with vortioxetine did not differ significantly from those treated with selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors/agomelatine with regard to the SMD of the primary outcome measure (0.081, −0.062 to 0.223) or for response (OR 0.815, 95% CI 0.585 to 1.135) and remission (OR 0.843, 95% CI 0.575 to 1.238) rates. Discontinuation owing to lack of efficacy (OR 0.541, 95% CI 0.308 to 0.950) was significantly less common among those treated with vortioxetine than among those who received placebo, whereas discontinuation owing to adverse events (AEs; OR 1.530, 95% CI 1.144 to 2.047) was significantly more common among those treated with vortioxetine than among those receiving placebo. There was no significant difference in discontinuation rates between vortioxetine and comparators owing to inefficacy (OR 0.983, 95% CI 0.585 to 1.650), whereas discontinuation owing to AEs was significantly less common in the vortioxetine than in the comparator group (OR 0.728, 95% CI 0.554 to 0.957).LimitationsStudies examining the role of vortioxetine in the treatment of MDD are limited.ConclusionAlthough our results suggest that vortioxetine may be an effective treatment option for MDD, they should be interpreted and translated into clinical practice with caution, as the meta-analysis was based on a limited number of heterogeneous RCTs.     

Tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in thirty-nine children under age seven: a retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the adverse effects of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) started in children under age 7 yr. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records for all children who had begun treatment with an SSRI under age 7 at an academic psychiatry department in Boston. RESULTS: Thirty-nine children (26 males, 13 females) met the inclusion criteria. Mean age at start of treatment was 5.9 +/- 0.8 yr, and median treatment duration was 5.0 months. The target diagnoses for SSRI treatment were anxiety disorders in 54%, depressive disorders in 23%, and both anxiety and depressive disorders in 20% of patients. There were no reports of suicidal ideation or attempt. No children were medically or psychiatrically hospitalized for adverse effects (AEs). Eleven patients (28%) reported an AE of at least moderate severity; 7 (18%) discontinued the SSRI due to the AE. Six patients discontinued due to behavioral activation and 1 due to gastrointestinal upset. The median time to onset of an AE was 23 days, and median resolution was 19 days from onset. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of adverse effects, especially activation, in this sample argues for continued caution in using SSRIs in young children. Controlled trials are warranted.     

Rotigotine transdermal patch in Chinese patients with early Parkinson's disease: A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled pivotal study

IntroductionTwo phase3 studies (SP512; SP513) involving mostly Caucasian patients showed that rotigotine (≤8 mg/24 h) was efficacious and welltolerated in early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD). We report results from a phase 3 study (SP0914/NCT01646268) investigating rotigotine in Chinese patients with early-stage PD.MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to rotigotine or placebo, titrated over 1–4 weeks, maintained at optimal/maximum dose (≤8 mg/24 h) for 24 weeks. Primary efficacy variable: change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II + III total score from Baseline to End-of-Maintenance. Secondary variables: UPDRS II + III responders (≥20% decrease in UPDRS II + III) and changes in UPDRS II (activities of daily living [ADL]) and III (motor examination) subscores.ResultsOf 247 patients randomized, 113/124 (91.1%) rotigotine- and 107/123 (87.0%) placebo-treated patients completed the study. Patients: mean (SD) age: 59.4 (10.2) years; time since PD diagnosis: 1.01 (1.22) years, 60.7% male. Rotigotine significantly improved UPDRS II + III total score (change from Baseline LSmean [95%CI] treatment difference, −4.82 [−7.18 to −2.45]; P < 0.0001). UPDRS II + III responder rates were higher with rotigotine (42.3% vs 22.3%; P = 0.0006). UPDRS II and III subscores improved with rotigotine (both subscores: P < 0.0005 vs. placebo). Most frequent adverse events (AEs): nausea (8.9% rotigotine, 3.3% placebo), dizziness (8.1%, 5.7%), pruritus (8.1%, 4.1%), somnolence (8.1%, 3.3%), erythema (6.5%, 1.6%), and vomiting (5.6%, 1.6%). Thirteen (5.3%) patients discontinued due to AEs (6 rotigotine, 7 placebo).ConclusionsRotigotine was efficacious in Chinese patients with early-stage PD, providing benefits to control of ADL and motor function. Rotigotine was generally welltolerated, with similar AEs to those observed in Caucasian patients.     

Impact of adverse events of bevacizumab on survival outcomes of patients with recurrent glioblastoma

BackgroundBevacizumab is widely used for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (rGB). It is well known that adverse events (AEs) due to bevacizumab can cause early discontinuation of treatment. However, the association between AEs and survival outcomes is not well defined.MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with rGB, who were treated with single-agent bevacizumab or bevacizumab-based combination regimens from 07/2005 through 07/2014, and who discontinued bevacizumab due to either AEs or physician’s decision. Those who discontinued bevacizumab because of tumor progression were excluded. Demographic, treatment, and survival data were collected from the database.ResultsOf 298 adults with rGB treated with bevacizumab in our database, 65 patients discontinued bevacizumab due to AEs (n = 39, 60%) or physician’s decision (n = 26, 40%). There were no statistically significant differences in regards to age, performance status, extent of resection, number of lesions, the time between diagnosis and first recurrence, time between diagnosis and initiation of bevacizumab, number of recurrences before bevacizumab initiation, and duration of bevacizumab treatment between the two groups. Interestingly, patients who discontinued bevacizumab because of AEs progressed earlier after bevacizumab discontinuation (3.9 months vs 5.7 months; p = 0.02), had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (10.4 months vs 14.2 months; p = 0.01) and shorter overall survival (OS) from bevacizumab initiation (13.9 months vs 32.5 months; p = 0.01) as well as shorter OS from tumor diagnosis (20 months vs 49.3 months; p = 0.007) when compared to patients who discontinued bevacizumab due to a physician’s decision.ConclusionsOur results indicate that the development of AEs to bevacizumab or bevacizumab-containing regimens is associated with unfavorable glioma-related survival outcomes in patients with rGB.     

Efficacy and acceptability of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled clinical trials

As some evidences demonstrated that atypical antipsychotics (AA) may be efficacious in treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), we preformed a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of AAs for the treatment of PTSD. Two hundred and fifty one papers were searched and screened. Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria. AAs may be superior to placebo in the treatment of PTSD, as indicated by the changes in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) total scores (weighted mean differences (WMD)=−5.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) [−9.21, −2.56], P=0.0005) and also in CAPS subscale intrusion (WMD=−2.58, 95% CI[−3.83, −1.33], P<0.0001 ) and subscale hyperarousal (WMD=−2.94, 95% CI[−5.45, −0.43], P=0.02). The acceptability measured by dropout rates between AAs and placebo showed no statistical difference (OR=1.24, 95%CI [0.78, 1.97], P=0.36). PTSD symptom cluster, especially in intrusion and hyperarousal. However, we should be careful to generalize the conclusion because of the small number of included trails. We expect more RCTs will be done in the future so as to clarify the specific value of AAs for PTSD.     

Vortioxetine,a multimodal antidepressant for generalized anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Vortioxetine has a beneficial pharmacological profile for reducing anxiety and depression. Recently, a number of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of vortioxetine have been conducted in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD); however, the results from GAD RCTs are inconsistent. With an extensive search of databases and clinical trial registries, four published short-term RCTs were identified and included in the present meta-analysis. The mean change in total scores on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) from baseline was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included the response and remission rates, as defined by a ≥50% reduction in HAMA total scores and a ≤7 change in the HAMA total score at the end of treatment. In addition, the mean change in the HAMA total score from baseline in the subgroup with a HAMA total score ≥25 at baseline was included. Vortioxetine was significantly more effective than was placebo, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of −0.118 (95% CIs, −0.203 to −0.033, P = 0.007). In particular, those with severe GAD (HAMA total score ≥25 at baseline) had a significantly greater benefit from vortioxetine than those without (SMD = −0.338, 95% CIs = −0.552 to −0.124, p = 0.002). The odds ratios (ORs) for vortioxetine for response and remission were 1.221 (95% CIs, 1.027 to 1.452, P = 0.024) and 1.052 (95% CIs, 0.853 to 1.296, P = 0.637), respectively. Discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) (OR = 1.560, 1.006 to 2.419, p = 0.047) was marginally higher in vortioxetine than placebo treatment, whereas discontinuation due to any reason (OR = 0.971, 0.794 to 1.187, p = 0.771) and inefficacy (OR = 0.687, 0.380 to 1.243, p = 0.215) were not significantly different among treatment groups. Although our results suggest that vortioxetine may have a potential as an another treatment option for GAD (especially for severe GAD), they should be interpreted and translated into clinical practice with caution, as the meta-analysis was based on a limited number of RCTs.     

Effect of psychiatric consultation models in primary care. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Objective

Psychiatric consultation in primary care is meant to enhance and improve treatment for mental disorder in that setting. An estimate of the effect for different conditions as well as identification of particularly effective elements is needed.

Methods

Database search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on psychiatric consultation in primary care. Validity assessment and data extraction according to Cochrane criteria were performed by independent assessors in duplicate. Meta-analysis was performed.

Results

Data were collected from 10 RCTs with a total of 3408 included patients with somatoform disorder or depressive disorder, which compared psychiatric consultation to care as usual (CAU). Meta-analysis irrespective of condition showed a weighted mean indicating a combined assessment of illness burden as outcome of psychiatric consultation, compared to CAU, of 0.313 (95% CI 0.190–0.437). The effect was especially large in somatoform disorder (0.614; 95% CI 0.206–1.022). RCTs in which after the consult, consultation advice was given by means of a consultation letter, showed a combined weighted mean effect size of 0.561 (95% CI 0.337–0.786), while studies not using such a letter showed a small effect of 0.210 (95% CI 0.102–0.319). Effects are highest on utilization of health care services with 0.507 (95% CI 0.305–0.708).

Conclusion

Psychiatric consultation in the primary care setting is effective in patients with somatoform and depressive disorder. Largest effects are seen in reduction of utilization of health care services.     

Evaluation of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in children and adolescents taking paroxetine

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to summarize results of a blinded review of potential suicidal events and analyses comparing incidence rates between paroxetine- and placebo-treated pediatric patients. METHOD: One thousand one hundred ninety-one (1191) children and adolescents received paroxetine (n = 642) or placebo (n = 549) during placebo-controlled portions of all acute double-blind trials of paroxetine (n = 5). An expert panel blindly reviewed and categorized all identified cases detected by electronic and manual search of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and selected cases as suicidal or non-suicidal behavior. Incidence rates were calculated for suicide-related events and for rating scale items assessing suicidality. RESULTS: Suicide-related events occurred more often in paroxetine (22 of 642, 3.4%) than placebo groups (5 of 549, 0.9%); odds ratio (OR) 3.86 (95% CI 1.45, 10.26; p = 0.003). All suicide-related events occurred in adolescents of at least 12 years, except for 1 of 156 paroxetine-treated children. All suicide attempts occurred in major depressive disorder (MDD); few suicide-related events occurred in patients with a primary anxiety disorder. Suicide item analyses did not reveal significant differences between paroxetine and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents treated with paroxetine showed an increased risk of suicide-related events. Suicidality rating scales did not show this risk difference. The presence of uncontrolled suicide risk factors, the relatively low incidence of these events, and their predominance in adolescents with MDD make it difficult to identify a single cause for suicidality in these pediatric patients.     

Neurological adverse events of new generation sodium blocker antiepileptic drugs. Meta-analysis of randomized,double-blinded studies with eslicarbazepine acetate,lacosamide and oxcarbazepine

PurposeAnalysis of overall tolerability and neurological adverse effects (AEs) of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), lacosamide (LCM) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) from double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Indirect comparisons of patients withdrawing because of AEs, and the incidence of some vestibulocerebellar AEs between these three antiepileptic dugs (AEDs).MethodsWe searched MEDLINE for all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials investigating therapeutic effects of fixed oral doses of ESL, LCM and OXC in patients with drug resistant epilepsy.Withdrawal rate due to AEs, percentages of patients with serious AEs, and the proportion of patients experiencing any neurological AE, nausea and vomiting were assessed for their association with the experimental drug.Analyses were performed between recommended daily doses of each AED according to the approved summary of product characteristics (SPC). Risk differences were used to evaluate the association of any AE [99% confidence intervals (CIs)] or study withdrawals because of AEs (95% CIs) with the experimental drug. Indirect comparisons between withdrawal rate and AEs dizziness, coordination abnormal/ataxia and diplopia were estimated according to network meta-analysis (Net-MA).ResultsEight randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials (4 with ESL, 3 with LCM, and 1 with OXC) were included in our analysis.At high doses (OXC 1200 mg, ESL 1200 mg and LCM 400 mg) there was an increased risk of AE-related study withdrawals compared to placebo for all drugs. Several AEs were associated with the experimental drug. Both number and frequency of AEs were dose-related.At high recommended doses, patients treated with OXC withdrew from the experimental treatment significantly more frequently than patients treated with ESL and LCM. Furthermore, the AEs coordination abnormal/ataxia and diplopia were significantly more frequently observed in patients treated with OXC compared to patients treated with LCM and ESL.ConclusionsThe overall tolerability of AEDs and the incidence of several neurological AEs were clearly dose-dependent. Indirect comparisons between these AEDs, taking into account dose-effect, showed that OXC may be associated with more frequent neurological AEs than LCM and ESL.     

Adverse cardiovascular events in antidepressant trials involving high-risk patients: a systematic review of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants were associated with an increased or decreased risk of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials published between 1967 and May 2005 that treated patients with cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, geriatric age, nicotine dependence, alcoholism, HIV infection, and obesity. We defined serious AEs as death due to a cardiovascular cause, heart failure, stroke, transient ischemic attack, and myocardial infarction. Nonserious AEs were defined as palpitations, chest pain, angina, arrhythmia, hypertension, hypotension-syncope, and unspecified cardiovascular or neurologic events. Adverse event rates were calculated in 4 groups: SSRIs, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), other active therapies, and placebo. RESULTS: Stroke and cardiac patients were the highest-risk groups for cardiovascular AEs. We were unable to detect differences in odds between SSRI and placebo for both serious (odds ratio [OR] 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 1.21) and nonserious (OR 1.18; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.57) cardiovascular AEs. There was a significant decrease in the odds of nonserious cardiovascular AEs (OR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.86, P = 0.02) for patients receiving SSRIs, compared with TCAs. Over one-half of the selected trials did not report the presence or absence of cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review of antidepressant trials in high-risk patients did not determine whether SSRIs are associated with a greater or lesser risk of cardiovascular AEs. Reasons for this conclusion include the rarity of serious AEs, the lack of large trials in these patients, and a lack of adequate reporting of AEs in published trials. Further trials assessing the risk of cardiovascular AEs and better trial reporting are needed.     

Safety of long-term combined immunosuppressive treatment in myasthenia gravis – analysis of adverse effects of 163 patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term adverse effect (AE) profile of azathioprine (AZA) plus methylprednisolone combined immunosuppressive treatment in myasthenia gravis (MG) in a larger patient cohort. A prospective, open, observational study was conducted on 163 MG patients treated with combined immunosuppressive medication for a mean duration of 35.5 months (range 9–79 months). During the treatment course, AEs occurred in 61.4% of patients; 18% of these patients developed both steroid- and AZA-related AE, 15% had purely AZA-related AE and 67% had steroid-associated AEs. Severe AEs were encountered in only 6.7% of patients in whom treatment had to be discontinued. The clinical severity of MG at the start of the immunosuppressive treatment was positively correlated with the frequency and severity of AEs during the treatment, and patients with severe MG were found to be at higher risk of developing AEs during the combined immunosuppressive treatment. Combined immunosuppressive treatment of MG patients is well tolerated, and severe AEs requiring treatment cessation are rare. The incidence of steroid-related AEs is high during long-time therapy which underlines the importance of its combination with AZA. The probability of developing AEs seems to correlate with the severity of MG at the beginning of the treatment.     

Rasagiline-associated motor improvement in PD occurs without worsening of cognitive and behavioral symptoms

BACKGROUND: Cognitive and behavioral adverse events (AEs) such as hallucinations, confusion, depression, somnolence and other sleep disorders commonly limit effective management of motor symptoms in PD. Rasagiline (N-propargyl-1(R)-aminoindan) mesylate is a novel, second-generation, selective, irreversible monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor, demonstrated in monotherapy and adjunctive trials to be effective for PD with excellent tolerability. METHODS: The occurrence of cognitive and behavioral AEs and the change from baseline in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part I mental subscores were reviewed in two multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, 26-week trials of rasagiline for early and moderate-to-advanced patients with PD. The UPDRS is a multi-item rating scale specific to PD; part I rates the patient's intellectual impairment, thought disorders, depression and motivation/initiative. RESULTS: The TEMPO study evaluated rasagiline monotherapy in early PD patients (n=404). The PRESTO study evaluated rasagiline as adjunctive therapy in moderate-to-advanced PD patients with motor complications who were receiving optimized levodopa/carbidopa (n=472). In the analysis of adverse event reporting for both studies, no cognitive and behavioral AE in either the rasagiline 1 mg or placebo groups exceeded 10% of the study population and the frequency differences between rasagiline 1 mg and placebo never exceeded 3%. There was no adverse effect on the UPDRS mental subscore relative to placebo in either of the two studies. CONCLUSION: Rasagiline 1 mg once daily improves PD symptoms and motor fluctuations in early and moderate-to-advanced PD patients without causing significant cognitive and behavioral AE or adverse changes in mentation, behavior and mood.     

Intravenous sodium valproate in status epilepticus: review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective: Status epilepticus (SE) is a common neurologic emergency. The present study constitutes a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of intravenous sodium valproate (VPA) in SE.

Methods: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were comprehensively searched, while retrieved RCTs and meta-analyses were manually screened. Prespecified outcome measures included seizure-cessation, 24?h-efficacy, constitute (liver enzyme increase, arrhythmias, bone-marrow suppression, hypotension and respiratory depression) and severe (life-threatening) adverse events (AEs). Evidence synthesis was performed when appropriate, using Random-Effects (RE) or Fixed-Effects (FE) model based on heterogeneity between trials (homogeneity assumed when PQ > 0.1 and I² < 50%). Outcomes were assessed using Odds-Ratios (ORs) and 95%Confidence-Intervals (95% CIs). Every available comparison was investigated in terms of efficacy and tolerability.

Results:Thirteen studies were retrieved and five comparisons were available, four of which involved two or more studies. Results were compatible with no significant difference between VPA and Phenytoin both in terms of efficacy and tolerability [seizure-cessation: FE-OR = 1.99, 95% CI = (0.83–4.75), 24?h-efficacy: FE-OR = 1.32, 95% CI = (0.60–2.89), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.45, 95% CI = (0.17–1.21)]. Phenobarbital proved more commonly associated with composite AEs than VPA [seizure-cessation: RE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.05–9.44), 24?h-efficacy: RE-OR = 0.88, 95% CI = (0.02–33.9), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.26, 95% CI = (0.09–0.82), severe AEs: FE-OR = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.04–2.28)]. Diazepam was determined inferior to VPA concerning safety issues [seizure-termination: FE-OR = 0.77, 95% CI = (0.34–1.79), severe respiratory depression: FE-OR = 0.06, 95% CI = (0.01–0.48), severe hypotension: FE-OR = 0.09, 95% CI = (0.01–0.72)]. The combination of Lorazepam (LZP) with VPA and the combination of LZP with Levetiracetam presented no difference in efficacy [24h-efficacy: FE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.37–1.24)].

Conclusions: Although, additional high-quality RCTs are warranted, according to our results, VPA can be considered a safe and effective option in the management of SE.