Affective syndromes, psychotic features, and prognosis. I. Depression

Prognosis is an important issue among patients who have psychotic features and a depressive syndrome; some have outcomes that suggest diagnostic revisions to schizophrenia, and this has far-reaching implications for treatment. To explore this issue, we used biannual evaluations to follow up 103 such individuals for 5 years. Patients with Research Diagnostic Criteria schizoaffective disorder experienced substantially more morbidity of various sorts than did patients with Research Diagnostic Criteria psychotic major depression. Within the group with schizoaffective disorder, patients with the chronic subtype experienced more morbidity than did those with nonchronic schizoaffective disorder; the mainly affective--mainly schizophrenic distinction had less prognostic significance. Factors that predicted sustained delusions at the end of follow-up were exclusively historical and suggested a poor-outcome prototype patient who is single, was socially impaired as an adolescent, and has a history of schizophrenialike psychotic features temporarily dissociated from affective symptoms.     

A family study of DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, compared with schizophrenia and psychotic and nonpsychotic major depression

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder, the authors explored the morbid risks for schizophrenia and major affective disorders in the first-degree relatives of patients with schizoaffective disorder and relevant other diagnoses. METHOD: In addition to patients with DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder, depressive type (N = 21), the probands included patients with mood-incongruent psychotic depression (N = 22), mood-congruent psychotic depression (N = 19), nonpsychotic depression (N = 27), or schizophrenia (N = 28) and normal subjects (N = 18). The patients were consecutively recruited from the outpatient facilities of a university psychiatry department; the normal subjects were students and nurses. All probands were directly interviewed, with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia--Lifetime Version (SADS-L), by a psychiatrist blind to information about relatives. Consenting relatives were directly interviewed, with the SADS-L, by two psychiatrists blind to the probands' diagnoses. The direct interview was supplemented--or replaced, when an interview was not possible (24%)--by family history data from all available sources. Morbid risks in relatives were calculated according to the Weinberg method. RESULTS: The relatives of the schizoaffective patients had almost the same risk for schizophrenia as the relatives of the schizophrenic patients. In the relatives of the patients mood-incongruent psychotic depression, the morbid risk for major affective disorders was about one-half that of the relatives of the patients with mood-congruent psychotic depression and one-third that of the relatives of the patients with nonpsychotic depression, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder is close to schizophrenia and largely corresponds to mainly schizophrenic schizoaffective disorder in the Research Diagnostic Criteria, whereas DSM-III-R mood-incongruent psychotic depression is probably quite heterogeneous and should be studied further.     

Depressive symptoms in schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: The authors assessed the presence and severity of depressive symptoms, as well as their associations with other clinical measures, in a group of mid- to late-life patients with schizophrenia who were not in a major depressive episode or diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder. METHOD: Sixty outpatients with schizophrenia between the ages of 45 and 79 years and 60 normal comparison subjects without major neuropsychiatric disorders, proportionally matched for age and gender, were studied. Depressive symptoms were rated primarily with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Standardized instruments were also used to measure global psychopathology, positive and negative symptoms, abnormalities of movement, and global cognitive status. RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were more frequent and more severe in schizophrenic patients than in normal comparison subjects; 20% of the women with schizophrenia had a Hamilton depression scale score of 17 or more. Severity of depressive symptoms correlated with that of positive symptoms but not with age, gender, negative symptoms, extrapyramidal symptoms, or neuroleptic dose. CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms are common in older patients with schizophrenia. They may be an independent, core component of the disorder or, alternatively, may be a by-product of severe psychotic symptoms.     

Abnormal rapid eye movement latencies in schizophrenia

Several previous studies have observed short rapid eye movement (REM) latencies in schizophrenic patients without major affective disorder. This study was designed to meet several of the criticisms of those previous studies. Using Research Diagnostic Criteria, we compared the sleep patterns of schizophrenic patients with those of normal controls and patients with major depressive disorder and schizoaffective disorder. All patients were medication free, and REM latency was explicitly defined using both strict and lenient criteria. Chronically ill paranoid or undifferentiated schizophrenics could not be distinguished from patients with major depressive disorder or schizoaffective disorder using any definition of REM latency. These results were not due to longer REM latency in the particular sample of patients with major depressive disorder. They had abnormally low REM latencies; however, the schizophrenic patients showed similar decrements. These data cast serious doubt on the specificity of short REM latency as a biological marker for major depressive disorder.     

The dexamethasone suppression test in a group of research diagnostic criteria schizoaffective depressed men

A dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was performed on 8 schizoaffective depressed men. Cross-sectional comparisons were made with three groups: schizophrenics (n = 10), unipolar major depressives (n = 23) and healthy controls (n = 43). All were drug-free and similar in age and body weight. Evaluations utilized the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for diagnosis, and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression for depressive symptom rating. DST nonsuppression, defined as a blood cortisol level of greater than or equal to 5.0 micrograms/dl at 16.00 h postdexamethasone, was observed in 43.5% of the major depressive disorder patients. This was different from the other three groups: 12.5% in schizoaffective depressed, 10.0% in schizophrenics and 9.3% in healthy controls (p less than 0.01, p less than 0.01, and p less than 0.001 respectively). Although schizoaffective depressed patients were significantly different from major depressive disorder patients in their DST responses, both groups were similar in their total HRSD scores and different from the schizophrenics (p less than 0.01 for each). These results, together with others previously reported by us on the thyrotropin-releasing hormone challenge in the same diagnostic groups, may be taken to mean that schizoaffective disorder, depressed type, is biologically distinct from major depressive disorder but not schizophrenia. On the other hand, until further corroborated, they should probably be considered a reflection of the heterogeneity of the schizoaffective syndrome and the nonspecificity of the DST.     

Outcome of schizoaffective disorder at two long-term follow-ups: comparisons with outcome of schizophrenia and affective disorders

OBJECTIVE: This research assessed whether the outcome of schizoaffective disorder is more similar to that of schizophrenia or that of affective disorders. METHOD: The authors conducted a prospective follow-up study of 101 schizoaffective, schizophrenic, bipolar manic, and depressed patients assessed at three times: during hospitalization and 2 and 4-5 years later. The follow-up test battery involved detailed assessment of social functioning, work performance, symptoms, posthospital treatment, and rehospitalization. RESULTS: Outcome for schizoaffective patients 4-5 years after hospitalization differed significantly from that for patients with unipolar depression. However, the differences between schizoaffective and bipolar manic patients were more equivocal. Unlike the patients with bipolar disorder, only a limited number of patients with schizoaffective disorder showed complete recovery in all areas throughout the year preceding the 2-year follow-up and the year preceding the 4- to 5-year follow-up. The differences in outcome between schizoaffective and schizophrenic patients were also mixed. These two groups showed some similarities in outcome, but there were fewer schizoaffective than schizophrenic patients with uniformly poor outcome in all areas. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, schizoaffective patients showed some similarities to both schizophrenic and bipolar manic patients. Schizoaffective patients had somewhat better overall posthospital functioning than patients with schizophrenia, somewhat poorer functioning than bipolar manic patients, and significantly poorer functioning than patients with unipolar depression. The data suggest that when mood-incongruent, schizophrenic-like psychotic symptoms are present in the acute phase, they predict considerable difficulty in outcome, even when affective syndromes are also present, as in schizoaffective disorder. It is likely that schizoaffective disorder is not just a simple variety of affective disorder.     

Low-dose (0.5-mg) dexamethasone suppression test in depressive patients

Fifty-six depressive patients underwent a low-dose (0.5-mg) Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST). Blood samples for cortisol assay were obtained twice on day 2, and the plots of the sum of the two cortisol values formed two groups, consisting, respectively, of suppressors and nonsuppressors. Nineteen (73.1%) of 26 patients with major depressive episodes (MDE) showed nonsuppression, as well as 12 of 15 MDE patients with melancholia, 3 of 3 with psychotic features, 3 of 4 with bipolar or atypical bipolar affective disorder, and 1 of 4 without melancholia. The specificity, calculated from the data of 53 patients (excluding 3 who were already known to be false-positive on the DST) was 85.2%, and the diagnostic confidence was 82.6%. The DSTs were reexamined in the 11 MDE patients showing nonsuppression, 8 of whom became suppressors with remission of the depressive symptoms.     

Treatment of schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia with mood symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with concurrent schizophrenic and mood symptoms are often treated with antipsychotics plus antidepressant or thymoleptic drugs. The authors review the literature on treatment of two overlapping groups of patients: those with schizoaffective disorder and those with schizophrenia and concurrent mood symptoms. METHOD: MEDLINE searches (from 1976 onward) were undertaken to identify treatment studies of both groups, and references in these reports were checked. Selection of studies for review was based on the use of specified diagnostic criteria and of parallel-group, double-blind design (or, where few such studies addressed a particular issue, large open studies). A total of 18 treatment studies of schizoaffective disorder and 15 of schizophrenia with mood symptoms were selected for review. RESULTS: For acute exacerbations of schizoaffective disorder or of schizophrenia with mood symptoms, antipsychotics appeared to be as effective as combination treatments, and there was some evidence for superior efficacy of atypical antipsychotics. There was evidence supporting adjunctive antidepressant treatment for schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients who develop a major depressive syndrome after remission of acute psychosis, but there were mixed results for treatment of subsyndromal depression. There was little evidence to support adjunctive lithium for depressive symptoms and no evidence concerning its use for manic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: Empirical data suggest that both groups of patients are best treated by optimizing antipsychotic treatment and that atypical antipsychotics may prove to be most effective. Adjunctive antidepressants may be useful for patients with major depression who are not acutely ill. Careful longitudinal assessment is required to ensure identification of primary mood disorders.     

Clinical predictors of acute response with quetiapine in psychotic mood disorders

BACKGROUND: In controlled studies of patients with schizophrenia, the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine, 300 mg/day, has been shown to be as effective in the treatment of positive and negative symptoms as haloperidol. However, little is known about the efficacy of quetiapine in patients with psychotic mood disorders. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of quetiapine in the treatment of psychotic mood disorders in comparison with nonaffective psychotic disorders and identify clinical factors associated with quetiapine response. METHOD: In a naturalistic setting, by reviewing medical records, we assessed response to quetiapine and factors associated with response to quetiapine in 145 consecutive patients newly treated with the drug at a nonprofit academic psychiatric hospital. These patients had received a discharge diagnosis of bipolar disorder (manic, mixed, or depressive type), major depression with psychotic features, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder (bipolar or depressive type), delusional disorder, or psychosis not otherwise specified (NOS) according to DSM-IV criteria. RESULTS: Patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, manic, mixed, or depressed and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type displayed higher response rates (> 74%) compared with patients with schizophrenia. However, this finding did not achieve statistical significance. A diagnosis of major depression with psychotic features (p = .02) and longer duration of illness (p = .03) were associated with less chance of responding. CONCLUSION: Quetiapine may be a useful alternative or adjunctive treatment for patients with bipolar and schizoaffective disorders.     

Validity of subtyping psychotic depression: examination of phenomenology and demographic characteristics

The authors examine the validity of subtyping psychotic depression by comparing 111 patients with schizoaffective, unipolar, and bipolar psychotic depression on demographic characteristics and symptoms at index episode. Diagnoses were made by using Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC). The three groups were indistinguishable in sex, race, and age at onset. Schizoaffective patients had more "schizophrenic" symptoms but were not different in depressive delusions, other psychotic symptoms, or affective symptoms. However, bipolar patients scored significantly higher than nonbipolar patients on hypomania. There is little support in these data for the schizoaffective versus nonschizoaffective distinction. Further tests are needed, including tests of response to treatment and biological markers.     

Further investigation of the dexamethasone suppression test in affective illnesses: relationship to clinical diagnosis and therapeutic response

The authors have studied the performances of the Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST) in 107 hospitalized patients diagnosed according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) and Feighner's criteria. The best performances of the DST are obtained for the diagnosis of primary depressed patients, suffering from a major depressive disorder. With the combination of these two diagnostic criteria, we found a sensitivity of 81%, a specificity of 81% and the diagnostic confidence of a positive test is 93%. Our study also shows 90% of abnormal DST results in schizoaffective disorder, depressed type, and no significant difference of the mean cortisol plasma levels at 4 p.m. after dexamethasone administration between depressed schizoaffective patients and major depressives. The finding of a better therapeutic response to antidepressive treatments in DST nonsuppressor patients than in suppressors is of interest for the predictive value of the DST in relation to treatment response.     

Obsessive-compulsive and panic symptoms in patients with first-admission psychosis

OBJECTIVE: The occurrence, persistence and specificity of the association between comorbid obsessive-compulsive and panic symptoms and three psychotic disorders--schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder with psychosis, and major depression with psychosis--were examined in a first-admission, epidemiologically defined group of patients with psychotic symptoms. METHOD: The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R obsessive-compulsive and panic modules were administered at baseline and 24-month follow-up to patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (N=225), bipolar disorder with psychosis (N=138), and major depression with psychosis (N=87) participating in the Suffolk County (N.Y.) Mental Health Project. The rates of subsyndromal symptoms and disorder criteria met were compared across the three psychosis groups. Recognition and treatment of anxiety symptoms at initial discharge and impact of the baseline presence of anxiety symptoms on 24-month clinical status were also examined. RESULTS: Obsessive-compulsive and panic symptoms were present at baseline in 10%-20% of all three groups. There was no specific association between obsessive-compulsive symptoms and any specific psychosis diagnosis; however, women with major depression with psychosis had a significantly higher rate of panic symptoms than the other two groups, and schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder patients with baseline panic symptoms were significantly more likely to exhibit positive symptoms of psychosis after 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found no specific association between obsessive-compulsive symptoms and diagnosis early in the illness course, but the finding of an association between panic symptoms and psychotic depression among female patients and between baseline panic and positive psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder patients at 24 months suggests the need for further study.     

Olanzapine therapy in treatment-resistant psychotic mood disorders: a long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest a role for the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine in the acute treatment of psychotic mood disorders, but long-term data are unavailable. The purpose of this naturalistic study was to determine the long-term effectiveness and tolerability of olanzapine as add-on therapy in psychotic mood disorders. METHOD: Hospital records were reviewed for 125 inpatients at the state psychiatric hospital in Buffalo, N.Y., who received at least 6 weeks of add-on olanzapine treatment for psychotic mood disorders (schizoaffective disorders [bipolar and depressive type], bipolar disorders [I, II, and NOS], and major depressive disorder). A group of schizophrenic patients served as a control group (N = 50). Baseline measures, including age, gender, number of hospitalizations in the 2 years prior to olanzapine treatment, concomitant medications, the Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI), and the Global Assessment of Functioning-Equivalent (GAF-EQ) and Kennedy Axis V psychological impairment, violence, social skills, and activities of daily living subscale scores, were obtained. Follow-up information was obtained from the patients at least 6 months after initiation of olanzapine or by chart review and discussion with the treating psychiatrist. Patients with a diagnosis of psychotic mood disorders were compared with patients with the non-affective psychotic disorder (schizophrenia) on a variety of outcome measures. RESULTS: Follow-up information was available on 102 patients (82%). Mean follow-up was 15 months; 50 (49%) of the 102 patients remained on olanzapine treatment at follow-up (32 psychotic mood disorder, 18 schizophrenic). The primary reason for discontinuation in both groups was lack of response. Both the psychotic mood disorder and schizophrenic groups had comparable outcomes on the CGI and GAF-EQ. Improvement on the Kennedy Axis V psychological impairment and social skills subscales was seen only in the psychotic mood disorders group (p < .01); both groups showed significant (p < .02) improvement in the violence subscale. Sustained mood-stabilizing effect was evident in only 7/27 (26%) of the psychotic mood disorders patients continuing on add-on olanzapine treatment at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Lack of response was the primary reason for discontinuation of add-on olanzapine in both groups. Mood symptoms predicted a better response to add-on olanzapine in patients with psychotic mood disorders on selective outcome measures. However, only 26% of the patients with psychotic mood disorders sustained a clinically meaningful mood-stabilizing effect with add-on olanzapine treatment at follow-up.     

Demographic, historical, and symptomatic features of the nonmanic psychoses

Consecutively admitted patients with nonmanic psychosis were more likely to meet Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for schizoaffective disorder, depressed type (N = 47), than for psychotic major depression (N = 29) or schizophrenia (N = 21). Although the RDC duration requirements for these three disorders are quite similar, schizophrenics had already experienced much more chronicity as reflected in episode duration, psychosocial impairment during the preceding 5 years, marital status, and low likelihood of prior remission. Schizoaffective patients took intermediate positions in these measures in accord with the majority of follow-up studies comparing these disorders. Although the RDC specify the same array of psychotic symptoms for schizoaffectives and for schizophrenics, these symptoms were significantly more prominent among the schizophrenics. Conversely, although this system also specifies the same list of depressive symptoms for major depression and schizoaffective depression, symptoms of endogenous depression were significantly more prominent in the major depression group. Thus, among functionally psychotic patients, those with schizophrenia-like symptoms have milder and less typical depressive symptoms whereas those with depressive syndromes have fewer and milder schizophrenia-like symptoms.     

Lateralized movement-related potential amplitudes differentiate between schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and major depression

ObjectiveTo examine whether deficits in focal lateralized motor system activation would differentiate between subjects with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and subjects with a major depressive episode. Reductions of Bereitschaftspotential amplitude have been described for both diagnostic groups.MethodsWe analyzed multi-channel lateralized movement-related potentials (LMRP) during choice reaction movements in 16 schizophrenic/schizoaffective patients in partial remission with predominant negative symptoms, 18 patients with a non-psychotic major depression and two healthy control groups age-matched to the respective patient groups (20/23 subjects).ResultsA significant reduction of lateralized potentials over the (pre-)motor areas immediately preceding and around movement execution was found only in subjects with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder but not with a major depressive episode. Reduced LMRP amplitudes correlated with negative symptoms (SANS score). Other movement stages (preceding response-locked ‘contingent negative variation’ during response selection and post-movement evaluation during motor postimperative negative variation) were not affected in the same way.ConclusionsDeficits in focal motor cortex activation during movement execution may reflect rather schizophrenia-specific deficits in fronto-striatal circuits. A general lack of drive and depressed mood did not alter the degree of lateralization of motor activation during movement execution.SignificanceLateralization of movement-related potentials could differentiate psychotic from non-psychotic disorders on the group level.     

Olanzapine in the treatment of depression with psychotic features: A prospective open-label study

Objective. Depression with psychotic features is a severe subtype of major depression associated with the presence of delusions, hallucinations and specific neurobiological features. Despite clinical consensus and guideline recommendations, data comparing the efficacy of combining antipsychotics with antidepressants compared to antidepressants alone remain inconclusive. The aim of the study was to investigate effectiveness and tolerability of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine in acute depression with psychotic features. Methods. Seventeen inpatients with major depressive disorder with psychosis (MDDp) were treated with a combination of an antidepressant and olanzapine for 6 weeks in a prospective open-label study. Depressive and psychotic symptoms, extrapyramidal and general side effects were assessed every 2 weeks. Sixteen patients were eligible for final analysis. Results. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) showed a 30% symptom reduction after week 2, a 45% symptom reduction after week 4 and no considerable improvement thereafter. Depressive symptoms (Bech–Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale, BRMS) receded by 37% after week 2 and 50% after week 4. No extrapyramidal side effects occurred. Conclusion. Olanzapine is effective and tolerable in combination with an antidepressant in an MDDp inpatient sample. The results concur with data supporting good efficacy in negative and depressive symptoms of patients with schizophrenic and schizoaffective diseases.     

Antidepressants in 'depressed' schizophrenic inpatients. A controlled trial

Fifty-eight actively psychotic inpatients who initially met criteria for long-standing schizophrenia and subsequently met Research Diagnostic Criteria for a current episode of schizoaffective disorder (mainly schizophrenic) with a depressive syndrome, and who scored at least 30 (mean = 55, SEM = 1.6) on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and 17 (mean = 23, SEM = 0.7) on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, were treated for 5 weeks with haloperidol hydrochloride and benztropine. Haloperidol and benztropine treatment was continued, while those patients who consistently scored greater than 17 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression were randomly assigned to the following double-blind treatment groups for 4 weeks: adjunctive amitriptyline hydrochloride, desipramine hydrochloride, or placebo. Adjunctive desipramine or amitriptyline showed no significant therapeutic advantage, when compared with haloperidol and placebo, on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale or the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. After 4 weeks of combine therapy, patients receiving adjunctive amitriptyline or desipramine, as compared with those receiving adjunctive placebo, tended to score higher on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale hallucinatory behavior item and on the thinking disturbance factor than patients receiving placebo. These results suggest that adjunctive antidepressants are not indicated for the treatment of depressive symptoms in actively psychotic schizophrenic inpatients. Adjunctive antidepressants may retard the rate of resolution of psychosis in this population.     

Depressive symptoms in schizophrenia: comprehensive differential diagnosis

Depression is a common complication of schizophrenia and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Contrary to traditional clinical wisdom, depressive symptoms occur during all phases of schizophrenia and are not restricted to the postpsychotic period. In this review, the authors summarize current empirical research and offer a practical approach to the identification of depressive subtypes in schizophrenia. The following subtypes are considered: (1) depressive symptoms occurring secondary to organic factors (caused by medications, substance abuse, or underlying medical problems); (2) nonorganic depressive symptoms occurring with acute psychotic symptoms (intrinsic to the acute psychotic episode or schizoaffective disorder); and (3) nonorganic depressive symptoms occurring without acute psychotic symptoms (prodromal symptoms, negative symptoms, acute dysphoria, secondary depressive syndrome, or chronic demoralization). The authors discuss each of these entities and offer guidelines for diagnosis.