Oral health‐related quality of life of 12‐ and 15‐year‐old Thai children: findings from a national survey

Abstract – Objective: To assess the prevalence and characteristics of oral impacts on daily life, and the relationship between certain dental conditions and impacts attributed to them, in a nationally representative population of Thai school children aged 12 and 15 years. Methods: A cross‐sectional study on a representative sample of children in Sixth Thailand National Oral Health Survey. Sample included half the children aged 12‐ and 15‐year‐old selected in Bangkok and all participants in 8 of 16 provinces included in national survey. Children were individually interviewed using the Child‐OIDP (12‐year‐old) and OIDP indices (15‐year‐old), and two questions for overall subjective assessments. Results: A total of 1066 12‐year‐olds and 815 15‐year‐olds were interviewed. Some 85.2% of 12‐year‐olds reported experiencing oral impacts during the past 3 months. Child‐OIDP scores ranged from 0 to 68.0 (mean = 7.83, SD = 7.8). Eating was the most commonly affected performance (64.4%), followed by cleaning teeth (51.7%) and maintaining emotional state (49.1%). Among 15‐year‐old children, 83.3% had oral impacts during the past 6 months. OIDP scores ranged from 0 to 39.5 (mean = 5.47, SD = 6.0). The three most commonly affected performances were eating (64.0%), cleaning teeth (55.3%) and maintaining emotional state (53.1%). Toothache and oral ulcers were the two most important perceived causes in 12‐year‐olds. Impacts from toothache were the most prevalent (39.2%) and had a condition‐specific (CS) Child‐OIDP score of 7.0, while oral ulcers affected 24.7% of children; mean CS‐score of 8.0. Among 15‐year‐olds, oral ulcers ranked first in terms of both prevalence (36.2%) and CS‐score (6.0), followed by toothache (prevalence 33.9% and CS‐score 5.0). For both age groups, problems with gums were of less concern. Conclusions: Oral impacts were common but not severe in Thai children and adolescents. For both age groups, impacts were mostly on eating performance; toothache and oral ulcers were the two important perceived causes reflecting needs for oral health promotion and treatment of dental caries and oral ulcers.     

Risk factors for impaired oral health among 18‐ to 34‐year‐old Australians

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine risk factors for a summary measure of oral health impairment among 18‐ to 34‐year‐olds in Australia. Methods: Data were from Australia's National Survey of Adult Oral Health, a representative survey that utilized a three‐stage, stratified, clustered sampling design. Oral health impairment was defined as reported experience of toothache, poor dental appearance, or food avoidance in the last 12 months. Multivariate Poisson regression models were used to evaluate effects of sociodemographic characteristics, self‐perceived oral health, dental service utilization, and clinical oral disease indicators on oral health impairments. Effects were quantified as prevalence ratios (PR). Results: The estimated percent of 18‐ to 34‐year‐olds with oral health impairment was 42.4 [95 percent confidence interval (CI) 37.7‐47.2]. In the multivariate model, oral health impairment was associated with untreated dental decay (PR 1.38, 95 percent CI 1.13‐1.68) and presence of periodontal pockets 4 mm+ (PR 1.29, 95 percent CI 1.03‐1.61). In addition to those clinical indicators, greater prevalence of oral health impairment was associated with trouble paying a $100 dental bill (PR 1.37, 95 percent CI 1.12‐1.68), usually visiting a dentist because of a dental problem (PR 1.46, 95 percent CI 1.15‐1.86), reported cost barriers to dental care (PR 1.46, 95 percent CI 1.16‐1.85), and dental fear (PR 1.43, 95 percent CI 1.18‐1.73). Conclusions: Oral health impairment was highly prevalent in this population. The findings suggest that treatment of dental disease, reduction of financial barriers to dental care, and control of dental fear are needed to reduce oral health impairment among Australian young adults.     

Oral health‐related quality of life among rural‐dwelling Indigenous Australians

Background: There is limited information on the impact of poor oral health on Indigenous Australian quality of life. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, extent and severity of, and to calculate risk indicators for, poor oral health‐related quality of life among a convenience sample of rural‐dwelling Indigenous Australians. Methods: Participants (n = 468) completed a questionnaire that included socio‐demographic, lifestyle, dental service utilization, dental self‐care and oral health‐related quality of life (OHIP‐14) factors. Results: The prevalence of having experienced one or more of OHIP‐14 items ‘fairly often’ or ‘very often’ was 34.8%. The extent of OHIP‐14 scores was 1.88, while the severity was 15.0. Risk indicators for having experienced one or more of OHIP‐14 items ‘fairly often’ or ‘very often’ included problem‐based dental attendance, avoiding dental care because of cost, difficulty paying a $100 dental bill and non‐ownership of a toothbrush. An additional risk indicator for OHIP‐14 extent was healthcare card ownership, while additional indicators for OHIP‐14 severity were healthcare card ownership and having had 5+ teeth extracted. Conclusions: Risk indicators for poor oral health‐related quality of life among this marginalized population included socio‐economic factors, dentate status factors, dental service utilization patterns, financial factors and dental self‐care factors.     

Oral health‐care utilization in adults with disabilities in Belgium

Leroy R, Declerck D. Oral health‐care utilization in adults with disabilities in Belgium.
Eur J Oral Sci 2013; 121: 36–42. © 2012 Eur J Oral Sci Reports on oral health‐service utilization among individuals with disabilities are very sparse. Nevertheless, such data are a prerequisite for the provision of proper care and for the development of optimal reimbursement schemes and may ultimately lead to better access to care. The objective of the present study was to provide data on oral health‐care utilization in Belgian residents with disabilities and to compare these data with the utilization pattern of their peers without special needs. Data from the Permanent Sample of Socially Insured Persons, an anonymous representative sample of Belgian residents, were used. The database contained prospective data on oral and general health‐care utilization and socio‐demographic variables from 1,221 individuals with disabilities and from 131,877 individuals without disabilities, collected from 2002 to 2008. Overall, annual dental‐attendance rates were very low and in those who attended, professional debridements, a cornerstone in preventive oral health care, were infrequently recorded. In adults with disabilities, significantly fewer radiographs, restorations, and endodontic treatments were recorded, whereas significantly more emergency visits were charged. Further research is indicated to evaluate whether this outcome points to high unmet oral‐treatment needs.     

Prevalence of dental erosion and association with lifestyle factors in Swedish 20-year olds

Objective. To investigate the prevalence, distribution and severity of dental erosion and its association with lifestyle, oral and general health in young adults. Materials and methods. Four hundred and ninety-four individuals, 20-years of age, participated. Dental erosion in molars and maxillary incisors was evaluated. Caries, plaque and gingivitis were registered. Saliva samples were taken and the subjects were interviewed about behavioural and dietary habits and oral and general health. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated. The individuals were sub-divided into two groups according to the presence and absence of dental erosion: within the group with erosion was a sub-group of individuals with extensive erosion. Results. Of the individuals 25% had no erosion, 75% had erosion and 18% had extensive erosion. Erosion was found in molars in 74% of the individuals and on buccal and palatal surfaces in maxillary incisors in 4% and 7%, respectively. Cupping was seen in 65% of individuals and severe erosion in molars in 1.6%. Compared to subjects with no erosion, those with extensive erosion had a higher consumption of soft drinks (p = 0.05), caries prevalence (p < 0.01), prevalence of mutans Streptococci (p < 0.01) and BMI (p < 0.05). Furthermore, subjects with erosion had higher caries prevalence (p < 0.01) and BMI (p < 0.01) than those with no erosion. Conclusions. Swedish young adults have a high prevalence of dental erosion, but the level of severe erosion is low. The study disclosed a relationship between dental erosion and behavioural factors, oral health and BMI.     

Oral health‐related quality of life of removable partial denture wearers and related factors

This study aims to investigate the oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) in a group of removable partial denture (RPD) wearers in Shiraz (Iran), using the Persian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP‐14). Two hundred removable partial denture wearers had completed a questionnaire regarding patients' demographic characteristics and denture‐related factors. In addition, the OHIP‐14 questionnaire was filled out by interviewing the patients. Two measures of interpreting the OHIP‐14 scales were utilised: OHIP‐14 sum and OHIP‐14 prevalence. The relationship of the patients' demographic characteristics and denture‐related factors, with their OHRQoL was investigated. The mean OHIP‐14 sum and OHIP‐14 prevalence of RPD wearers were 13·80 (±10·08) and 44·5%, respectively. The most problematic aspects of OHIP‐14 were physical disability and physical pain. Twenty‐seven percentage and 24% of participants had reported meal interruption and eating discomfort, respectively. OHIP‐14 prevalence and OHIP‐14 sum were found to be significantly associated with factors representing RPD wearer's oral health such as self‐reported oral health and frequency of denture cleaning. Furthermore, OHIP‐14 prevalence and OHIP‐14 sum were significantly associated with factors related to frequency of denture use such as hours of wearing the denture during the day and wearing the denture while eating and sleeping. Therefore, it can be concluded that the OHRQoL of the patients of the study was generally not optimal and found to be strongly associated with oral health.     

Oral health care needs and oral health‐related quality of life (OHIP‐14) in homeless people

Daly B, Newton T, Batchelor P, Jones K. Oral health care needs and oral health‐related quality of life (OHIP‐14) in homeless people. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2010. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S Abstract – Objectives: The aim of this study was (i) to determine the oral health status and oral health care needs of this population, (ii) to assess oral health‐related quality of life using OHIP‐14 and (iii) to explore whether there is a relationship between oral health status and oral health‐related quality of life. Methods: A convenience sample was drawn from eight facilities catering for homeless people in south east London. Participants were invited to attend an outreach dental clinic and receive a clinical oral health and treatment needs assessment. The impact of oral disease was assessed using OHIP‐14. Results: There were 102 people from a range of vulnerable housing situations invited to participate in the study. The mean age was 39.5 (SD ± 12.3) and 92% (n = 92) were men. The mean DMFT of dentate participants (n = 94) was 15.5 (SD ± 7.6), mean DT was 4.2 (SD ± 5.2), mean MT was 6.8 (SD ± 6.0) and mean FT was 4.6 (SD ± 4.8). Normative needs were extensive with 76% having a restorative need, 80% having a need for oral hygiene measures and periodontal treatment and 38% having a prosthetic treatment need. Ninety one per cent of homeless people experienced at least one impact and the mean number of impacts (n = 90) was 5.9 (SD ± 4.8).The most commonly experienced oral health‐related quality of life impacts were in the dimension of pain, with aching in the mouth having a prevalence of 65% and discomfort while eating foods having a prevalence of 62%. Forty‐four per cent felt handicapped by their oral condition. The experience of oral impact had only a slight relationship with clinical status and there were no differences in clinical status or oral impact by vulnerability of housing situation. Conclusions: Oral health care needs were extensive and greater than that of the general population in the UK, although disease levels were similar. While homeless people experienced many more oral impacts (as measured with OHIP‐14) compared with adults of the same age in the general population in the UK, there was only a slight relationship with clinical status and oral health‐related quality of life.