Right‐sided valve disease

In this review, we discuss right‐sided heart valve disease, namely tricuspid regurgitation (TR), tricuspid stenosis, pulmonary regurgitation, pulmonary stenosis and right‐sided endocarditis. These are frequently seen in conjunction with other diseases, making assessment of their significance more difficult, but it has become increasingly clear that moderate or severe right‐sided heart valve disease, in particular TR, is associated with worse prognosis. There remain large gaps in our knowledge of medical and interventional treatment, but in this article we outline what is known about the causes, presentation and management of these commonly seen conditions.     

Pharmacological and non‐pharmacological treatment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) comprises a disease spectrum ranging from simple steatosis and steatohepatitis to cirrhosis. Based on its strongest risk factors namely visceral obesity and insulin resistance, NAFLD is thought to be the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome and is considered to be the most common liver disorder in Western countries. Pathophysiological mechanisms include an enlarged pool of fatty acids, subclinical inflammation, oxidative stress and imbalances of various adipocytokines such as adiponectin. Accordingly, targets for therapeutic interventions are miscellaneous: amelioration of obesity by pharmacological, surgical or lifestyle intervention has been evaluated with success in numerous, but not all studies. Some efficacy was reported for metformin and short‐term glitazone treatment. In a large recently reported trial, vitamin E supplementation improved biochemical and histological markers in subjects with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis. Blockade of the endocannabinoid system has been proposed to be a promising target in NAFLD; however, very recently the cannabinoid receptor blocker rimonabant has been withdrawn because of central nervous system toxicity. Cytoprotective therapies and statins have been mainly ineffective in NAFLD. New but so far insufficiently studied therapeutic approaches include inhibitors of the renin‐angiotensin system as well as incretin mimetics respectively.     

Understanding gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease: a patient‐cluster analysis

Objective: To determine whether patients with gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be grouped according to the physical and psychological impact of their disease. Methods: In this multinational study, 7713 primary care physicians (PCPs) and gastrointestinal (GI) specialists took part in a structured online survey to determine how they perceive the clinical and psychological needs of their GERD patients, based on their three most recent consultations. Patients were grouped according to one of the five clusters that were subjectively developed based on preceding qualitative research. Results: Findings are reported for 1157 respondents (875 PCPs, 282 GI specialists), who reviewed 3471 patient records. Two of the five original clusters were collapsed because of overlapping characteristics, giving rise to three patient clusters. Patients with ‘long‐term, disrupting GERD’ (39%) had symptoms considered to have not only high physical but also psychological impact. Patients with ‘recurrent, distressing GERD’ (14%) experienced both physical and psychological impact and were worried about the recurrent, restrictive nature of their disease or the possibility of having a more serious underlying condition. Patients with ‘inconveniencing GERD’ (48%) had less frequent symptoms with overall lower impact. Overall, there was a trend for GI specialists to more likely see patients at higher clinical need than PCPs. Conclusions: Patients with GERD can generally be classified according to the physical and psychological impact of their disease. Recognition that such patients have different needs may facilitate improved management of GERD by allowing treatment to be tailored according to the patient’s need.     

High‐density lipoprotein from end‐stage renal disease patients exhibits superior cardioprotection and increase in sphingosine‐1‐phosphate

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) exacerbates the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Modifications to blood lipid metabolism which manifest as increases in circulating triglycerides and reductions in high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol are thought to contribute to increased risk. In CKD patients, higher HDL cholesterol levels were not associated with reduced mortality risk. Recent research has revealed numerous mechanisms by which HDL could favourably influence CVD risk. In this study, we compared plasma levels of sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P), HDL‐associated S1P (HDL‐S1P) and HDL‐mediated protection against oxidative stress between CKD and control patients.

Methods

High‐density lipoprotein was individually isolated from 20 CKD patients and 20 controls. Plasma S1P, apolipoprotein M (apoM) concentrations, HDL‐S1P content and the capacity of HDL to protect cardiomyocytes against doxorubicin‐induced oxidative stress in vitro were measured.

Results

Chronic kidney disease patients showed a typical profile with significant reductions in plasma HDL cholesterol and albumin and an increase in triglycerides and pro‐inflammatory cytokines (TNF‐alpha and IL‐6). Unexpectedly, HDL‐S1P content (P = .001) and HDL cardioprotective capacity (P = .034) were increased significantly in CKD patients. Linear regression analysis of which factors could influence HDL‐S1P content showed an independent, negative and positive association with plasma albumin and apoM levels, respectively.

Discussion

The novel and unexpected observation in this study is that uremic HDL is more effective than control HDL for protecting cardiomyocytes against oxidative stress. It is explained by its higher S1P content which we previously demonstrated to be the determinant of HDL‐mediated cardioprotective capacity. Interestingly, lower concentrations of albumin in CKD are associated with higher HDL‐S1P.     

Expression of platelet‐bound stromal cell‐derived factor‐1 in patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease

Summary. Aims: Blood cell infiltration and inflammation are involved in atrial remodelling during atrial fibrillation (AF) although the exact mechanisms of inflammatory cell recruitment remain poorly understood. Platelet‐bound stromal cell‐derived factor‐1 (SDF‐1) is increased in cases of ischemic myocardium and regulates recruitment of CXCR4⁺ cells on the vascular wall. Whether platelet‐bound SDF‐1 expression is differentially influenced by non‐valvular paroxysmal or permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has not been reported so far. Methods and results: A total of 1291 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing coronary angiography were recruited. Among the patients with SAP, platelet‐bound‐SDF‐1 is increased in patients with paroxysmal AF compared with SR or to persistent/permanent AF (P < 0.05 for both). Platelet‐bound SDF‐1 correlated with plasma SDF‐1 (r = 0.488, P = 0.013) in patients with AF and ACS, which was more pronounced among patients with persistent AF (r = 0.842, P = 0.009). Plasma SDF‐1 was increased in persistent/permanent AF compared with SR. Patients with ACS presented with enhanced platelet‐bound‐SDF‐1 compared with SAP. Interestingly, among patients with ACS, patients with paroxysmal or persistent/permanent AF presented with an impaired platelet‐bound SDF‐1 expression compared with patients with SR. Conclusions: Differential expression of platelet‐bound and plasma SDF‐1 was observed in patients with AF compared with SR which may be involved in progenitor cell mobilization and inflammatory cell recruitment in patients with AF and ischemic heart disease. Further in vivo studies are required to elucidate the role of SDF‐1 in atrial remodeling and the atrial fibrillation course.     

Immunomonitoring of graft‐versus‐host minor histocompatibility antigen correlates with graft‐versus‐host disease and absence of relapse after graft

BACKGROUND: After HLA‐identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, minor histocompatibility (mH) antigen alloreactivity plays a dominant role in the development of graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) and graft versus leukemia (GVL). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We have analyzed the mH alloreactivity (enzyme‐linked immunospot [ELISpot] for interferon‐γ[IFN‐γ] assay) from 24 donor/recipient pairs over a period of 2 years of follow‐up and correlated such alloreactivity with the development of GVHD or absence of relapse. Circulating specific T cells anti‐mH with multimer HLA‐peptides were also studied. RESULTS: We show by ELISpot IFN‐γ assay that alloreactivity during the first 3 months from donor versus recipient or donor versus mismatched identified mH antigens is associated with acute GVHD and GVL effect. In addition, we demonstrate that the donor‐versus‐recipient reactivity observed after the third month is highly associated with chronic GVHD and GVL (p = 0.0007). Finally, we show by multimer HLA‐peptide assay that mH epitope‐specific T cells present after 3 months are statistically related to the GVL effect. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a robust method to monitor mH antigen graft‐versus‐host reaction and suggest that current identified mH have predictive value on GVHD and GVL.     

Correlations of disease severity and age with hematology parameter variations in patients with COVID‐19 pre‐ and post‐treatment

BackgroundFor better understanding of the pathological changes of COVID‐19, benefiting clinical management of the disease and the preparation for future waves of similar pandemics.MethodsHematology parameters from a total of 52 cases of COVID‐19 admitted for treatment in a designated hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Data were analyzed by SPSS statistical software.ResultsPre‐treatment T‐cell subsets, total lymphocytes, red blood cell distribution width (RDW), eosinophils, and basophils were significantly lower than that of post‐treatment, while the inflammatory indexes neutrophils, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels, as well as red blood cell (RBC) and hemoglobin, were significantly reduced after treatment. The T‐cell subsets, total lymphocytes, and basophils in severely and critically ill patients were significantly lower than those in moderately ill patients. Neutrophils, NLR, eosinophils, procalcitonin (PCT), and CRP was significantly higher in severely and critically ill patients than in moderately ill patients. CD3+, CD8+, total lymphocytes, platelets, and basophils in patients older than 50 were lower than that of those younger than 50, while neutrophils, NLR, CRP, and RDW in patients older than 50 were higher than that of younger than 50. There was a positive correlation among prothrombin time (PT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in severely and critically ill patients.ConclusionsT‐cell subsets, lymphocyte count, RDW, neutrophils, eosinophils, NLR, CRP, PT, ALT, and AST are important indicators in the management especially for severely and critically ill patients with COVID‐19.     

Associations between hematological parameters and disease severity in patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection

BackgroundThe emergence and rapid spread of the deadly novel coronavirus disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is a swiftly evolving public health crisis worldwide. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is characterized by the development and progression of inflammatory responses. Hematological parameters, such as white blood cells (WBCs) and their subpopulations, red cell distribution width, platelet count, mean platelet volume, plateletcrit, and derived markers such as neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio, are established biomarkers of inflammatory responses. We aimed to investigate associations between hematological parameters and disease severity in patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 68 patients with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Twenty‐two patients had mild illness, and 46 had moderate or severe illness at the time of admission. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify correlates of disease severity. The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to estimate and compare the predictive values of different diagnostic markers.ResultsMean lymphocyte and monocyte counts were lower while WBC counts, neutrophil counts, NLR, and PLR were higher in patients with severe disease compared with those with mild disease (all P < .01). Univariate analysis revealed that older age, high WBC counts, high neutrophil counts, high NLR, high PLR, low monocyte counts, and low lymphocyte counts were independent correlates of severe illness. Multivariate analysis identified high NLR as the only independent correlate of severe illness. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that NLR had the highest area under curve of all hematological parameters.ConclusionAmong hematological parameters, the NLR showed superior prediction of disease severity in patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Thus, the NLR could be a valuable parameter to complement conventional measures for identification of patients at high risk for severe disease.     

Comparison of the CELLEX™ and UVAR‐XTS™ closed‐system extracorporeal photopheresis devices in the treatment of chronic graft‐versus‐host disease

Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) is a cellular immunotherapy frequently used for steroid‐refractory graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD). Chronic GVHD (cGVHD), response to ECP is associated with survival benefit. The UVAR‐XTS^TM system and the more recently developed CELLEX^TM device (both Therakos^TM) are the mainstay for ECP‐delivery in the UK and US. No comparison of treatment outcomes has been reported. We retrospectively compared cGVHD response and steroid reduction and withdrawal in patients treated exclusively over 12 months with either the XTS (n = 51) or CELLEX (n = 50). Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in clinical outcome or steroid changes in the 2 matched cohorts. We also compared infection incidence, infection‐related death (IRD), and treatment time. Significant clinical improvement and regular capacity to reduce or cease steroids was encountered in both cohorts; at 6 months of ECP 70% of cutaneous cGvHD patients had partial or complete responses and 85% of patients receiving steroids pre‐ECP had reduced dosage. In the XTS group we unexpectedly encountered both superior steroid reduction (86% dose at least halved vs. 61% for CELLEX, P = 0.01) and withdrawal (15 vs. 5 CELLEX, P = 0.01) and a trend for superior skin disease response in the CELLEX‐treated cohort at 3 months. No inter‐relationship was evident. Halving or greater reduction of steroid dose by 3 or 6 months was associated with reduced risk of IRD in the XTS cohort as was withdrawal at 6 months for the combined cohorts. By 6 months, XTS‐treated patients had experienced fewer antibiotic‐requiring infections (mean 1.9 vs. 2.8, P = 0.025). Origins for the disparities are unclear and warrant investigation.