Audit of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Universities of Melbourne HPB Group

BACKGROUND: Because the postoperative stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has shortened, it seemed that outpatient LC would be feasible. The aim of this study was to prospectively audit initial experience with outpatient LC at the Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre. We aimed to determine appropriate patient selection criteria, to devise anaesthetic and discharge protocols and to assess patient satisfaction at follow up. METHODS: All patients presenting for LC were assessed for suitability, and those elective cases unlikely to have a duct stone and fulfilling the social criteria were studied. After standard anaesthetic and LC technique, patients recovered in the day surgery unit for up to 8 h and were discharged if stable. The hospital in the home nursing service monitored patients for 48 h and arranged readmission if needed. Patient satisfaction was assessed by independent telephone questionnaire 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (median age 43 years) underwent outpatient LC with a discharge rate of 82.3%, resulting in a cost saving of $984 per patient treated. One patient was readmitted, giving an overall success rate of 80%. After stricter implementation of the protocol in the second half of the study, the discharge rate rose to 92%. Patient acceptance of the technique was high at 84.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the first 45 patients show that it is possible to safely perform outpatient LC with a low admission rate in fit, elective patients who live close to medical care. Provided a strict anaesthetic protocol is followed, the technique has good patient acceptance and provides some economic benefit to the hospital.     

AUDIT OF OUTPATIENT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Background : Because the postoperative stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has shortened, it seemed that outpatient LC would be feasible. The aim of this study was to prospectively audit initial experience with outpatient LC at the Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre. We aimed to determine appropriate patient selection criteria, to devise anaesthetic and discharge protocols and to assess patient satisfaction at follow up. Method s: All patients presenting for LC were assessed for suitability, and those elective cases unlikely to have a duct stone and fulfilling the social criteria were studied. After standard anaesthetic and LC technique, patients recovered in the day surgery unit for up to 8 h and were discharged if stable. The hospital in the home nursing service monitored patients for 48 h and arranged readmission if needed. Patient satisfaction was assessed by independent telephone questionnaire 6 weeks postoperatively. Results : Forty‐five patients (median age 43 years) underwent outpatient LC with a discharge rate of 82.3%, resulting in a cost saving of $984 per patient treated. One patient was readmitted, giving an overall success rate of 80%. After stricter implementation of the protocol in the second half of the study, the discharge rate rose to 92%. Patient acceptance of the technique was high at 84.5%. Conclusions : The results of the first 45 patients show that it is possible to safely perform outpatient LC with a low admission rate in fit, elective patients who live close to medical care. Provided a strict anaesthetic protocol is followed, the technique has good patient acceptance and provides some economic benefit to the hospital.     

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Hong Kong: patient acceptance

The authors performed a prospective evaluation of 60 Hong Kong Chinese patients with symptomatic gallstones and gallbladder polyps undergoing outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a regional hospital in Hong Kong from March 1996 to May 1998 to determine the feasibility, satisfaction, and acceptance of this procedure among Chinese patients. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I and II gallstones or polyps were selected. Exclusion criteria included 1) history of upper abdominal operations, attacks of acute cholecystitis, cholangitis, or pancreatitis; 2) abnormal liver function; and 3) ultrasonographic evidence of contracted gallbladder, thickened gallbladder wall, dilated common bile duct, or common bile duct stones. Patients discharged at 5:00 PM on the day of cholecystectomy were defined as having undergone outpatient procedure. Patients were asked about procedure acceptance, rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (best), using a standardized questionnaire 4 weeks after operation. The study included 21 men and 39 women with mean age of 40.5 years (range, 27-59). There were no conversions to open procedures in the series. There were 6 (10%) unanticipated postoperative hospital admissions; all patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. Another patient was readmitted 3 days after operation because of a common bile duct stone. Overall patient acceptance of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy was good, with a mean score of 8.6 of 10. Thirteen patients (22%) expressed dissatisfaction with being discharged earlier than they had expected, and 9 (15%) would have preferred inpatient care. Forty-eight patients (80%) resumed full daily activities by the first postoperative day; the remaining 12 did so by the end of the first week. Among the 44 working patients, only 4 (9%) resumed full duty within the first postoperative week; 29 (66%) did so by the second week and the remaining 11 (25%) returned to work after the third week. By selecting appropriate subjects, outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible and highly accepted among Hong Kong Chinese patients. Approximately one quarter of the patients preferred a longer postoperative stay or inpatient care.     

Prospective randomized trial on low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Inpatient low-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LPLC) has been shown to have less postoperative pain (especially shoulder-tip pain). No report so far has documented the use of lower-pressure pneumoperitoneum in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A prospective randomized trial was conducted in Tung Wah Hospital, Day Surgery Centre from January 2004 to December 2004. A total of 40 patients were recruited and 20 of whom were allocated to each arm. Outcome measures included operation time, treatment-related morbidity, mortality, postoperative pain (eg, shoulder-tip pain), consumption of analgesics, and level of satisfaction. All patients in both groups could be discharged on the same day. Patients' demographics and operation time were comparable in both groups. There were no treatment-related morbidity and mortality, nor was there any significant difference in postoperative pain. Less shoulder-tip pain was observed in the LPLC group though without significant difference (5% vs. 20%; P=0.151). Three patients in the LPLC group needed higher insufflation pressure (12 mm Hg) because of inadequate exposure and adhesions, and the operations were successful in all of them. Otherwise, no conversion to open procedure was noted in both groups. The consumption of analgesics was minimal and a high level of satisfaction was achieved in both groups of patients. The present study demonstrated no difference in LPLC and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the outcomes of outpatient LC. Routine use of lower-pressure pneumoperitoneum in outpatient LC would not be recommended unless in selected straightforward cases.     

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway

OBJECTIVE: To determine the success of a clinical pathway for outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in an academic health center, and to assess the impact of pathway implementation on same-day discharge rates, safety, patient satisfaction, and resource utilization. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is reported to be safe for patients and acceptable as an outpatient procedure. Whether this experience can be translated to an academic health center or larger hospital is uncertain. Clinical pathways guide the care of specific patient populations with the goal of enhancing patient care while optimizing resource utilization. The effectiveness of these pathways in achieving their goals is not well studied. METHODS: During a 12-month period beginning April 1, 1999, all patients eligible for an elective LC (n = 177) participated in a clinical pathway developed to transition LC to an outpatient procedure. These were compared with all patients undergoing elective LC (n = 208) in the 15 months immediately before pathway implementation. Successful same-day discharges, reasons for postoperative admission, readmission rates, complications, deaths, and patient satisfaction were compared. Average length of stay and total hospital costs were calculated and compared. RESULTS: After pathway implementation, the proportion of same-day discharges increased significantly, from 21% to 72%. Unplanned postoperative admissions decreased as experience with the pathway increased. Patient characteristics, need for readmission, complications, and deaths were not different between the groups. Patients surveyed were highly satisfied with their care. Resource utilization declined, resulting in more available inpatient beds and substantial cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a clinical pathway for outpatient LC was successful, safe, and satisfying for patients. Converting LC to an outpatient procedure resulted in a significant reduction in medical resource use, including a decreased length of stay and total cost of care.     

Feasibility study of day case thyroidectomy

Introduction: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the feasibility and outcome of day case thyroidectomy in an ambulatory surgery centre in Hong Kong. Methods: Patients with day case thyroidectomy carried out between July 2005 and December 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Day surgery was offered to patients satisfying the selection criteria for day case and having from benign unilobular thyroid disease. Results: Fifty patients had hemithyroidectomy carried out during the study period. There were 6 men and 44 women and the mean (standard deviation SD) age was 45.6 years (7.4 years). All patients were American Society for Anesthesiologists grade I (76%) or II (34%). The mean (SD) operative time was 79.5 min (17 min). Twelve patients had episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The mean (SD) analgesic requirement was 0.7 tablets (0.5 tablets) of combination acetaminophen and phenyltoloxamine citrate before discharge. The mean (SD) time to discharge was 7.5 h (0.7 h). The overall discharge rate was 98% and the complication rate was 8%. One patient was observed overnight because of postoperative haematoma. One patient had recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. There were no unplanned readmissions postoperatively. Three patients had unsuspected thyroid malignancy on histopathology. Conclusion: This study showed the feasibility and safety of day case thyroidectomy. The setting was not associated with any increase in morbidity or mortality and has the potential in reducing hospital costs.     

OUTPATIENT LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

Background : Outpatient laparoscopic surgery has been adopted by number of centres but an assessment of the patients' view of postoperative symptoms and satisfaction has not been reported. This study was undertaken to prospectively assess protocol for outpatient laparoscopic surgery established with the aims of minimizing postoperative symptoms and optimizing same–day discharge. Methods : Patients were considered appropriate for an outpatient laparoscopic procedure if they met the following criteria: if they were less than 70 years of age; if they were ASA category I or II; if they lived within 30 min of healthcare facility; and if they had an appropriate escort to accompany them on discharge and who would stay with the patient on the night after surgery. Clinical data were prospectively recorded. A telephone interview was carried out on the day after surgery to assess postoperative symptoms and patient satisfaction. Results : One hundred patients were planned for outpatient laparoscopic surgery (60 laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 36 laparoscopic groin hernia repair, and four miscellaneous); 95 of them were discharged on the day of surgery. The five patients remained in hospital because of surgical indications rather than complications of the anaesthetic. There were no readmissions on subsequent days. The telephone interview showed that pain was adequately controlled for 84% of patients, and that nausea (9%) and vomiting (4%) were uncommon. One hundred per cent of patients considered the anaesthetic and nursing care to be good or excellent, and 95% indicated they would have outpatient surgery for future similar procedure. Twenty-nine per cent felt well enough to return to work on the second postoperative day. Conclusions : The success of this programme relates to patient selection and education, appropriate anaesthesia and defined anaesthetic and surgical protocol.     

Predictive factors of long hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the most common minimally invasive surgery in Hong Kong. However, ambulatory LC is not a common practice in Hong Kong. This study aims to identify the causes of long hospital stay after elective LC and to delineate a guideline for ambulatory LC. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 278 patients who underwent successful elective LC in a single unit between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2003 was performed. They were divided into two groups: LS group had a long hospital stay (>24 hours after operation) and SS group had a short hospital stay. A total of 18 variables, including five patient variables, nine operative variables and four postoperative variables, were identified for univariate analysis. Significant pre- and postoperative factors were included in the multivariate analysis to identify independent predictive factors for long hospital stay. RESULTS: Of the 278 patients, 118 (44.2%) could be discharged within 24 hours, while 149 (55.8%) had long hospital stay. Nine significant factors were identified in the univariate analysis; three independent factors were found to predict long hospital stay in the multivariate analysis. Patients with age more than 60 years had double risk of long hospital stay. Patients who could not tolerate diet within 8 hours or took more than two tablets of oral analgesia (dologesics) had a four- and threefold increase in risk of long hospital stay, respectively. CONCLUSION: With careful patient selection, optimal postoperative pain control and early resumption of diet with better management of postoperative nausea and vomiting, ambulatory LC was feasible and safe.     

Analgesia with femoral nerve block for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is performed routinely as an outpatient surgical procedure despite few studies of patient acceptance or postoperative patient analgesia. This study reports the first series of postoperative femoral nerve blocks as analgesia for outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The authors retrospectively reviewed 161 patients undergoing two incision arthroscopically assisted autograft middle 1/3 patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on an out-patient basis at the authors' institution during a period of 30 months. Hospital and anesthesia records were reviewed, and 83% of patients were contacted retrospectively to survey their perceptions of the procedure and its outcome. Ninety-eight percent of the patients were discharged from the ambulatory surgery center, with 51% discharged the same day as the surgery and 47% discharged by 7:00 AM the next day. As the study progressed, the number of patients staying overnight was reduced by 50%. Ninety-eight percent of patients surveyed found femoral nerve block to be beneficial, and the same percentage thought the discharge time was appropriate. However, 69% of patients staying overnight cited reasons other than pain as factors in their stay. No significant complications were reported. Based on these results, the administration of a femoral nerve block is recommended for patients undergoing outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction because it is a highly effective form of analgesia with an excellent degree of patient satisfaction.     

Unplanned inpatient admissions in a day surgery service in Hong Kong

Objective: To evaluate the cause of inpatient admissions in the first 50 months of a day surgery service in Hong Kong. Method: A retrospective analysis of all unplanned inpatient admissions from the Day Surgery Centre in Tung Wah Hospital from November 1995 to December 1999 was undertaken. The causes of admission were classified and analysed to whether they might be avoidable. Results and conclusion: Two percent of the 1688 day‐patients required inpatient admission. The commonest cause of admission was extended surgery followed by retention of urine. None of the admissions was due to a major complication. Over one‐third of admissions might be avoidable.     

Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe and acceptable as a day case procedure?

BACKGROUND: This study reviewed the results of performing day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy to assess the feasibility and safety of the procedure as a day case. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of 150 day case laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between September 1999 and December 2004 under the care of the senior author. The results of a follow-up questionnaire to assess post-discharge clinical course and patient satisfaction were analyzed. All patients had commenced eating and drinking and were fully mobile before discharge home. The length of hospital stay was 4-8 hours. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 43 years; 134 patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I, the remaining 16 patients were grade II. The mean operative time was 41 minutes. There were no conversions to open procedures. There was no bleeding, no visceral injury, and no mortality. There was one admission directly from the day surgical unit (admission rate of 0.6%), but no readmission following discharge. No patients were admitted due to postoperative nausea or pain. Ninety-nine (66%) of 150 patients responded to our questionnaire: 97% were satisfied about the information they had received. Patients rated their satisfaction with the procedure as follows: 75% excellent, 21% good, 3% satisfied, and 1 patient un-satisfied. Ninety-four percent of the patients would recommend the procedure as a day case. CONCLUSION: Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe, feasible, and cost-effective when patients are carefully selected. It provides good patient satisfaction.     

Total shoulder arthroplasty as an outpatient procedure using ambulatory perineural local anesthetic infusion: a pilot feasibility study

We investigated the feasibility of converting total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) into an outpatient procedure using ambulatory interscalene perineural ropivacaine infusion. Of the patients of the first phase (n = 8) who were required to remain hospitalized for at least 1 postoperative night, 5 met discharge criteria in the recovery room. Of the subsequent patients of the second phase (n = 6), all met discharge criteria in the recovery room after surgery, and 5 were discharged directly home. For all patients, postoperative pain was well controlled, oral opioid requirements and sleep disturbances were minimal, range-of-motion consistently reached or exceeded the surgeon's expectations, and patient satisfaction was high. These results suggest that TSA may be performed on an outpatient basis using perineural local anesthetic infusion. Additional research is required to define the appropriate subset of patients and assess the incidence of complications associated with this practice before its mainstream use.     

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Day Surgery Procedure: Implementation and Audit of 136 Consecutive Cases in a University Hospital

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been routinely performed since 1989 at our institution, and patients were traditionally admitted for 2 days. In 1996 we implemented a protocol for LC as a day surgery procedure at our center. Although initially reported by others, it has not yet been introduced as routine in Switzerland. The objective of this prospective study was to determine acceptability and safety of LC as an outpatient procedure in a university hospital. Data were collected prospectively for 136 LCs between January 1996 and December 2001. Patients were selected for the study if they wanted to go home within less than 24 hours, had no previous jaundice, and had no anesthetic contraindication. Systematic preoperative liver function tests and hepatic ultrasonography were performed. All patients were admitted on the day of operation. LC was performed using a three-trocar technique. Systematic cholangiography was performed, and all the procedures were completed laparoscopically. There were no common bile duct explorations. Postoperative complications were the following: nausea in seven patients, a minor umbilical hematoma in two. According to patient preference, 101 (74%) were discharged after an overnight stay (less than 24 hours) and 32 (24%) on the same day. The unplanned admission rate was 2%, and none of the patients was subsequently readmitted. The reasons for unplanned admissions were two patients with persistent nausea and one patient for whom an overnight stay was scheduled who presented with a ruptured subcapsular hematoma of the liver. Altogether, 97% of the patients were satisfied with the care they received. Operative costs were not significantly different when comparing inpatient and outpatient LC. The main postoperative savings were in the postoperative costs. Our results confirm that LC as a day surgery procedure is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients and their relatives. These results were achieved by using selection criteria that considered not only the surgical pathology but also the individual and by using appropriate techniques and planned postoperative analgesia.     

Eighteen-year experience with femoro-femoral bypass

BACKGROUND: The role of femoro-femoral bypass in the management of aorto-iliac occlusive disease has evolved during the past two decades. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the early and long-term outcomes of femoro-femoral bypass grafts performed at the University of Hong Kong Medical Centre during an 18-year period. METHODS: From 1981 to 1998, a retrospective analysis of 61 patients who underwent femoro-femoral bypass at the University of Hong Kong Medical Centre was undertaken. Data on demographic features and results of surgical intervention were reviewed. Early outcomes (morbidity, mortality and improvement of clinical category) and long-term outcomes (graft patency, patient survival and limb salvage rates) were analysed. RESULTS: The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 16% and 7%, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 48 patients (79%) after operation. The primary patency of femoro-femoral bypass was 86%, 79% and 71% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. The limb salvage rate was 85% at 3 years. The cumulative survival rate of the study population was 89%, 82% and 73% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Femoro-femoral bypass was successful in relieving ischaemic pain and limb salvage in approximately 80% of patients. A 5-year patency rate of 71% was achieved. Femoro-femoral bypass remains a valuable surgical procedure for limb salvage in poor-risk patients with unilateral iliac artery occlusion.     

无功能性肾上腺肿瘤实施日间手术的可行性评估

目的探索对无功能肾上腺良性肿瘤患者实施日间手术的可行性、安全性及有效性。 方法采用方便抽样的方法选取2018年11月至2019年11月瑞金医院日间病房实施手术的25例无功能肾上腺良性肿瘤患者作为实验组,并选取同期32例在瑞金医院泌尿外科实施常规住院手术的无功能肾上腺肿瘤患者作为对照组。实验组患者的术前检查、健康宣教、麻醉评估等医疗服务于门诊完成,在日间手术室行全麻下腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤切除,术后进行常规护理,术后第2天8∶00在满足出院评估标准后出院。对照组患者的术前检查、健康宣教、麻醉评估等医疗工作按常规住院手术在入院后完成,在病房手术室行全麻下腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤切除,术后进行常规护理,术后根据患者恢复情况经评估后出院。比较两组患者手术时间、住院时间、住院医疗费用、满意度等指标。 结果实验组术前等待入院手术时间、住院时间、住院医疗费用均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。实验组患者出院后满意度（100%）高于对照组（93%）。两组均未发生明显的术后并发症。 结论对于无功能肾上腺肿瘤患者开展日间手术和实施管理安全有效,且可大大提高医疗资源的利用率,是一种非常高效的手术医疗模式。     

Multimodal approach to rapid discharge after endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy

BACKGROUND: After a large experience (more than 10 years) with bilateral endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) surgery on an outpatient basis, we studied prospectively a multimodal approach to rapid discharge patients undergoing this procedure. METHODS: One hundred and seventeen consecutive patients, aged 13-60 years, ASA physical status I or II, undergoing outpatient ETS under general anaesthesia were enrolled in this study. All patients were managed using a predefined multimodal clinical care protocol consisting of a general balanced anaesthesia. Basic demographic information was collected from each patient. Duration of surgery and anaesthesia and times to PACU and home discharge were recorded as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications like nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Surgery took 41.4 +/- 22.1 min and anaesthesia lasted 63 +/- 21.5 min. Time between induction of anaesthesia and beginning of surgery and end of surgery to extubation was 15.0 +/- 2.0 and 7.2 +/- 3.1 min, respectively. It took 4.9 +/- 1.5 min from extubation to OR discharge. Time from PACU arrival to discharge was 12.8 +/- 6.3 min. Time of hospital stay was 132 +/- 18 min. No patient experienced vomiting and two had nausea, representing an incidence of 1.7%. The only anaesthetic cause for hospital admission was a severe allergic reaction. CONCLUSION: Multimodal management to rapid discharge after ETS surgery did result in a short time to patient discharge. We confirm that endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy can be performed safely on an outpatient basis with brief postoperative hospital care and a low rate of complications.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a ‘session’ surgery

Aims: To introduce laparoscopic cholecystectomy to our Day Surgery Unit and assess the implications of a 6 h postoperative stay in unselected patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data was performed in which the case notes of a series of 170 consecutive patients undergoing day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied. All patients with symptomatic gallstones were considered for day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were excluded if there was major medical co-morbidity but not solely on the basis of age or Body Mass Index (BMI). Surgery was performed in a dedicated Day Surgery Unit and cholangiography was performed selectively. All patients were assessed at 6 h postoperatively for discharge and followed up by telephone at 24, 48 h and 2 weeks postoperatively. Results: Of 170 patients 121 (71.1%) were discharged at 6 h, 116 reported no problems and were satisfied with day case treatment. Two (1.6%) patients required a GP visit at home within 24 h and three (2.5%) patients required readmission. Forty-nine (28.9%) patients required admission, the commonest cause for admission being postoperative pain and nausea (10.6%) in approximately equal proportions. Three were admitted as they had open surgery. One patient required further surgical intervention (laparoscopy). Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a ‘session’ surgery, with planned discharge 6 h after operation, is successful in the majority of unselected patients even though a significant number of overnight admissions are to be anticipated.     

Eighteen‐year experience with femoro‐femoral bypass

Background : The role of femoro‐femoral bypass in the management of aorto‐iliac occlusive disease has evolved during the past two decades. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the early and long‐term outcomes of femoro‐femoral bypass grafts performed at the University of Hong Kong Medical Centre during an 18‐year period. Methods : From 1981 to 1998, a retrospective analysis of 61 patients who underwent femoro‐femoral bypass at the University of Hong Kong Medical Centre was undertaken. Data on demographic features and results of surgical intervention were reviewed. Early outcomes (morbidity, mortality and improvement of clinical category) and long‐term outcomes (graft patency, patient survival and limb salvage rates) were analysed. Results : The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 16% and 7%, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 48 patients (79%) after operation. The primary patency of femoro‐femoral bypass was 86%, 79% and 71% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. The limb salvage rate was 85% at 3 years. The cumulative survival rate of the study population was 89%, 82% and 73% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Conclusions : Femoro‐femoral bypass was successful in relieving ischaemic pain and limb salvage in ~ 80% of patients. A 5‐year patency rate of 71% was achieved. Femoro‐femoral bypass remains a valuable surgical procedure for limb salvage in poor‐risk patients with unilateral iliac artery occlusion.     

Outpatient brain tumor surgery: innovation in surgical neurooncology

OBJECT: Recent studies of conventional craniotomies and image-guided biopsies have afforded a solid characterization of surgical morbidity and the timing of its occurrence. This report outlines a novel 11-year experience with outpatient image-guided biopsy and outpatient craniotomy for supratentorial intraaxial brain tumors. METHODS: During the period between August 1996 and May 2007, 117 awake image-guided biopsies and 145 elective craniotomies for tumor resection were prospectively selected to be performed as outpatient procedures. Data were recorded for each patient regarding tumor histological type, reasons for admission if planned early discharge failed, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Successful discharge from the Day Surgery Unit was possible in 109 (93%) of 117 biopsy cases and 136 (94%) of 145 craniotomy cases (only 2 of which [1.5%] required unplanned readmission after discharge). Neurological worsening occurred in 5.1% of the patients who underwent image-guided biopsies, and in 5.5% of those who underwent outpatient craniotomies (based on intent-to-treat group analysis). No patient suffered an adverse event with alteration in outcome because of planned outpatient discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient image-guided brain biopsy and outpatient craniotomy for tumor resection are safe and effective procedures in selected patients.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a "true" outpatient procedure: Initial experience in 130 consecutive patients

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has received nearly universal acceptance and is currently considered the "gold standard" for the treatment of cholelithiasis. Many centers have employed "short-stay" units or "23-hour admissions" for postoperative observation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The practice of early discharge as "true" outpatients following this procedure has not been well defined. A retrospective analysis of 130 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an outpatient surgery unit was performed. A follow-up telephone survey was carried out of patients who successfully completed the procedure as outpatients. One hundred thirty patients underwent outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patient population consisted of 78% women, with an age range of 17 to 76 years (mean age 47.1 years). Symptomatic gallstone disease was the indication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 92 % of the patients. All patients underwent successful completion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with no conversions to an open procedure. The mean length of operation was 75 ±23 minutes (range 25 to 147 minutes). The mean length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) ranged from 95 to 460 minutes with a mean length of stay of 200 ±79 minutes. A total of eight patients (6.2%) were admitted to the hospital directly from the PACU in the immediate postoperative period. Six of these eight patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. Following discharge from the PACU, an additional six patients (4.6%) required hospital admission. Three of these six patients were discharged after a single day of hospitahlization. Ninety-eight of 116 eligible patients were available for follow-up telephone evaluation. The outpatient experience was rated as good by 75.5% of the patients, fair by 22.5%, and poor by 2%. In retrospect, 20.4% of the patients stated that they would have preferred an inpatient to an outpatient procedure. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed as a true outpatient procedure with patients discharged to home within hours of completion of the procedure. Less than 10% of patients will fail this protocol and another 5% of the patients may require hospitalization after returning to their homes. Presented at the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, New Orleans, La., May 17–20, 1998.