Long-term management of facial atopic eczema with pimecrolimus cream 1% in paediatric patients with mild to moderate disease

Background The aim of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate whether treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) with pimecrolimus cream 1% can decrease the development of flares necessitating the use of a topical corticosteroid on the face and thus reduce the need for use of topical corticosteroids in this sensitive skin area. Patients and methods In a controlled, double‐blind, multicentre study, 140 patients, aged 2 to 17 years, with facial involvement and mild to moderate disease after treatment of the initial flare with prednicarbate 0.25% cream were randomized to an intermittent treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% twice daily or vehicle for 24 weeks. If a flare occurred, defined as an exacerbation (unacceptable severity of itching/scratching or onset of oozing) not controlled by study medication, patients were treated with prednicarbate 0.25% cream instead. Results Patients in the vehicle group needed prednicarbate treatment on the face on 20.7% of the days vs. 11.7% of the study days in the pimecrolimus group (P = 0.0024). Fifty per cent of patients in the pimecrolimus group had no flare on the face during the treatment period compared with 37.5% of patients in the vehicle group (P = 0.012). The median time to first flare in pimecrolimus‐treated patients was twice as long as in patients receiving vehicle (138 vs. 68 days, P = 0.01). Three adverse events (one case of skin burning) suspected to be related to use of the study medication were reported for three patients (3.9%) in the pimecrolimus group. Conclusion Long‐term intermittent treatment of facial AD in children and adolescents with pimecrolimus cream 1% does significantly reduce the need for topical corticosteroids.     

Pimecrolimus cream 1% vs. betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% cream in the treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis. A randomized open-label clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Seborrhoeic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory disease with remissions and exacerbations, characterized by erythema, scaling and pruritus primarily on the face, scalp and chest. Corticosteroids and antifungals are the mainstay of therapy. However, chronic use of corticosteroids is associated with side-effects such as skin atrophy and telangiectasia. Pimecrolimus, an inhibitor of calcineurin, has been used successfully in one patient with seborrhoeic dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this randomized open-label clinical trial was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of pimecrolimus in comparison with a potent corticosteroid (betamethasone 17-valerate) in the treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis. METHODS: Twenty patients with seborrhoeic dermatitis were included in this study, 11 patients in the pimecrolimus 1% cream group and nine patients in the betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% cream group. Patients were instructed to use a thin layer of the study products twice daily at the lesional area and to discontinue treatment as soon as symptoms were absent. Clinical measures assessed were erythema, scaling and pruritus which were evaluated using a four-point scale (0-3). RESULTS: Both pimecrolimus and betamethasone were highly effective in the treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis. Betamethasone reduced all three parameters, erythema, scaling and pruritus, faster than pimecrolimus, but the differences in reduction were not statistically significant. Relapses were observed more frequently and were more severe with betamethasone than with pimecrolimus. Moreover, pruritus was not observed after discontinuation of treatment from day 15 and beyond in the pimecrolimus group, whereas it was reported in most patients of the betamethasone group. This difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that pimecrolimus, a nonsteroidal topical treatment, may be an excellent alternative therapeutic modality for treating seborrhoeic dermatitis.     

An open-label efficacy pilot study with pimecrolimus cream 1% in adults with facial seborrhoeic dermatitis infected with HIV

BACKGROUND: Seborrhoeic dermatitis (SD) is a common dermatosis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients, many of whom do not respond satisfactorily to conventional topical treatments such as corticosteroids and antifungals. OBJECTIVE: A pilot study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of pimecrolimus cream 1% in HIV-positive patients with facial SD. METHODS: In a single-centre study, 21 HIV-infected patients with mild to severe SD were treated twice daily with pimecrolimus cream 1% for 14 days. Thereafter, treatment was discontinued and patients followed up for 5 weeks. Skin involvement at baseline and on days 7, 14, 21, 35 and 49 was assessed using a four-point clinical score and digital photography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% treatment and incidence of relapse in the follow-up phase. Results Marked improvement was seen in clinical parameters at day 7, with >or= 90% patients clear of symptoms at day 14. Relapse was observed at day 35 but signs were milder than at baseline. All patients responded to therapy, despite their immunological status. Pimecrolimus did not alter CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell counts or viral load during the treatment period. CONCLUSION: Pimecrolimus cream represents a new, effective therapeutic option for facial SD in HIV patients.     

Effects of pimecrolimus cream 1% in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis who demonstrate a clinical insensitivity to topical corticosteroids: a randomized, multicentre vehicle-controlled trial

Background  Colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis (AD) is often associated with worsening of clinical symptoms. Staphylococcus aureus produces superantigens that contribute to cutaneous inflammation and corticosteroid (CS) resistance.
Objectives  To investigate the relationship between CS insensitivity, S. aureus colonization and superantigen production in AD, and to explore the efficacy of pimecrolimus cream in CS-insensitive AD.
Methods  This was a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study. Seventy-three patients with AD, aged 2–49 years, who had a documented clinical insensitivity to topical CS, were recruited. The primary efficacy parameters combined laboratory (including S. aureus colonization, superantigens) and clinical assessments [including Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), whole body Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), pruritus assessment score, patient's assessment score of disease control].
Results  An increase in S. aureus counts correlated with worsening of clinical score (week 6 vs. baseline) when assessed by IGA, pruritus severity and patient assessment. The presence of superantigens correlated with this worsening. During the 6-week double-blind phase, disease improvement in the pimecrolimus cream group was demonstrated by decreasing EASI scores compared with vehicle. Mean EASI scores for the head and neck showed greater improvement in the pimecrolimus cream group than in the vehicle group at all observed time points.
Conclusions  In a cohort of patients with clinical insensitivity to CS there was a significant positive correlation between S. aureus and disease severity. Results suggest that for some of these patients, treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% is useful, especially in the head/neck area.     

The treatment of facial atopic dermatitis in children who are intolerant of, or dependent on, topical corticosteroids: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Background  Atopic dermatitis (AD) is most prevalent in areas of reduced skin barrier reserve, like face and neck, especially in children. Treatment with topical corticosteroids (TCS) is limited due to heightened risk of treatment-associated side-effects, thus necessitating alternative AD therapies.
Objectives  The primary study objective was to determine the efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% in children with mild–moderate facial AD dependent on/intolerant of TCS. Secondary objectives included effects on overall Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), head/neck EASI, pruritus severity and time to clearance of facial AD.
Methods  A multicentre, double-blind (DB) study of ≤ 6 weeks, followed by a 6-week, open-label (OL) phase was conducted. Two hundred patients (aged 2–11 years) were randomized 1 : 1 to pimecrolimus cream 1% ( n  =   99) or vehicle ( n  =   101) twice daily until clearance of facial AD or for a maximum of 6 weeks (DB phase). Sixteen patients receiving vehicle were allowed to switch to the OL phase at day 22.
Results  Significantly more pimecrolimus-treated vs. vehicle-treated patients were cleared/almost cleared of facial AD (Investigators' Global Assessment 0/1): 74·5% vs. 51·0%, P  <   0·001 (day 43) [57·1% vs. 36·0%, P  =   0·004 (day 22)]. Median time to clearance was 22·0 vs. 43·0 days (pimecrolimus vs. vehicle, respectively). Statistically significant differences for pimecrolimus vs. vehicle were also seen on head/neck EASI, overall EASI, and head/neck pruritus scores. Adverse events were mainly mild–moderate, occurring with similar frequency in both treatment groups.
Conclusions  In children with facial dermatitis intolerant of/dependent on TCS, pimecrolimus cream 1% effectively controls eczema and pruritus and is well tolerated.     

Treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% clears irritant dermatitis of the periocular region, face and neck

Background  Irritant dermatitis of the face and neck is particularly prevalent in women ≥ 30 years old, who typically present with periocular cutaneous symptoms. Current therapies are limited, indicating a need for rapid, effective alternatives. Pimecrolimus cream 1%, a nonsteroid, cell-selective inhibitor of inflammatory-cytokine release, is effective in the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases, such as chronic irritant dermatitis of the hands, and thus offers a potential therapeutic option for this indication. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus treatment in patients with irritant periocular dermatitis, extending to the face and neck in some patients.
Methods  Twenty-seven patients with periocular irritant dermatitis (extending onto the face and neck in eight) were treated twice daily with pimecrolimus cream 1% for 7 d, followed by once-daily application for a further 7 d. Erythema, swelling, and pruritus were assessed at baseline, weeks 1–4 using a 4-point clinical score (0, absent; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe).
Results  All patients showed marked improvement within 2–3 d of treatment with disease clearance in 23 of 27 patients within 14 d. In the remaining four patients, mild relapse occurred at weeks 3–4, but improvement was observed following a further 10-d treatment. Side-effects were mild and transient.
Conclusion  Pimecrolimus cream 1% provides a new potential option for treatment of irritant dermatitis of the periocular region, head and neck. Further double-blind, controlled studies are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% for this indication.     

Efficacy of pimecrolimus 1% cream in the long term management of atopic hand dermatitis. A double-blind RCT

Background: Efficacy and steroid sparing effects of pimecrolimus 1 % cream in atopic dermatitis have been shown recently, but there is no data on efficacy in long term management of atopic hand dermatitis. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of pimecrolimus 1 % cream as maintenance therapy in patients suffering from atopic hand dermatitis. Patients and Methods: A double‐blind vehicle controlled study in 40 adult patients with atopic hand dermatitis (IGA < 3) comparing the efficacy of twice daily application of pimecrolimus 1 % cream given as maintenance treatment versus vehicle over a 8 week period after clinical response (IGA < 2) to a 1–3 week pre‐treatment with mometasone fuorate 0.1 % was performed. Primary endpoint was the time to relapse (IGA > 3). Results: Thirty‐six out of 40 patients were randomised to receive either pimecrolimus 1 % (P) or vehicle cream (V). The number of patients with stable remission in patients randomised to pimecrolimus (53.8 %) and vehicle (43.8 %) did not achieve statistical significance between the groups (p = 0.41). Subgroup analysis of patients with initially moderate dermatitis (IGA = 3, n = 20) showed a trend towards a better outcome for the pimecrolimus group (stable remission P = 81.8 % versus V = 55.6 %) (p = 0.244). Conclusions: Pimecrolimus 1 % cream twice daily was not superior to vehicle in the sequential maintenance therapy of atopic hand dermatitis, but efficacy in moderate forms should be investigated in further studies.     

Comparative efficacy of calcipotriol (MC903) cream and betamethasone 17-valerate cream in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group multicentre study

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of calcipotriol cream was compared with betamethasone 17-valerate cream in the treatment of plaque-type psoriasis in a multicentre double-blind, parallel group study. Patients with stable mild-to-moderate chronic disease were randomized to treatment with either calcipotriol, 50 μg/g, in a cream formulation (210 patients) or betamethasone 17-valerate cream, 1 mg/g (211 patients). After a wash-out period of 2 weeks. the treatment was applied twice daily, without occlusion. for 8 weeks or to complete clearing. The severity of psoriasis was assessed using the PASI at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks treatment. The mean percentage reduction of PASI from baseline to end of treatment was 47.8% in the calcipotriol group and 45.4% in the betamethasone group. The reduction from baseline was highly significant in both groups. but the differecnce between the groups was not significant. There was a difference in the reduction in thickness of the lesions in favour of calcipotriol. The investigator's as well as the patient's overall assessment of treatment response at end of treatment showed no difference between the two treatment groups. Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with calcipotriol thanbetamethasone. Lesional/perilesional irritation was reported in 16% and 9% (P=0.03). and facial irritation in 10% and 0.5% (P<0.001), respectively. No change was found in serum levels of calcium. Calcipotriol in a cream formulation was effective, safe well-tolerated. and equal in effect to betamethasone valerate cream.     

1% pimecrolimus, 0.005% calcipotriol, and 0.1% betamethasone in the treatment of intertriginous psoriasis: a double-blind, randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE: During the last decades, management of intertriginous psoriasis (IP) has been unsatisfactory because of the adverse effects associated with long-term corticosteroid application and the lack of alternatives. Recently, both pimecrolimus and tacrolimus have been investigated for this indication and shown to be safe and effective. So far, to our knowledge, a comparison of one of these drugs with standard regimens for IP has not been performed. DESIGN: A single-center, 4-week, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled comparison study to assess the safety and efficacy of 1% pimecrolimus, 0.005% calcipotriol, and 0.1% betamethasone valerate in the treatment of IP. SETTING: Dermatologic hospital at Ruhr University of Bochum. PATIENTS: Eighty adults with IP. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment of IP with 1% pimecrolimus, 0.005% calcipotriol, 0.1% betamethasone, or the vehicle once daily for 28 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean reduction of the Modified Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (M-PASI) score after 28 days of treatment was considered the primary outcome measure, which was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The secondary outcome was a visual analog scale score for itching. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment, the 3 active compounds and the vehicle resulted in a significant decrease in mean M-PASI score (86.4% for 0.1% betamethasone, 62.4% for 0.005% calcipotriol, 39.7% for 1% pimecrolimus, and 21.1% for vehicle). The 0.1% betamethasone was significantly more effective than 1% pimecrolimus during the study period (P<.05). No significant difference was found between 0.005% calcipotriol and 0.1% betamethasone and between 0.005% calcipotriol and 1% pimecrolimus. The visual analog scale score for pruritus decreased by 78% for 0.1% betamethasone, 57% for 0.005% calcipotriol, 35% for 1% pimecrolimus, and 43% for the vehicle, again demonstrating a clear advantage for the corticosteroid (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 1% pimecrolimus was shown to be less potent than 0.1% betamethasone in the treatment of IP. Considering the adverse-effect profile of long-term application of corticosteroids, occasional or intermittent rescue therapy with short-term topical corticosteroids and maintenance with a less potent agent, such as 1% pimecrolimus or 0.005% calcipotriol, might be appropriate for patients with IP in general practice.     

Twice-daily versus Once-daily Applications of Pimecrolimus Cream 1% for the Prevention of Disease Relapse in Pediatric Patients with Atopic Dermatitis

Abstract:  The aim of this study is to compare twice-daily and once-daily applications of pimecrolimus cream 1% for prevention of atopic dermatitis relapses in pediatric patients. This multicenter trial enrolled 300 outpatients aged 2 to 17 years, with mild-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The patients were initially treated with twice-daily topical pimecrolimus until complete clearance or for up to 6 weeks (open-label period). Those who achieved a decrease of at least 1 point in the Investigator's Global Assessment score were then randomized to double-blind treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% either twice daily or once daily for up to 16 weeks. Study medication was discontinued during periods of disease remission (Investigator's Global Assessment = 0). The primary efficacy end point of the double-blind phase was disease relapse (worsening requiring topical corticosteroids or additional/alternative therapy and confirmed by Investigator's Global Assessment score ≥ 3 and pruritus score ≥ 2). Of the 300 patients enrolled in the study, 268 were randomized to treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% either twice daily or once daily ( n  = 134 in each group). The relapse rate was lower in the twice-daily dose group (9.9%) than that in the once-daily dose group (14.7%), but analysis of the time to disease relapse, using a Cox proportional model to adjust for confounding variables, did not show a statistically significant difference between treatment arms (hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.31–1.30). Treatment of active atopic dermatitis lesions with pimecrolimus cream 1% twice daily, followed by the once-daily dosing regimen, was sufficient to prevent subsequent atopic dermatitis relapses over 16 weeks in pediatric patients.     

Fluticasone propionate (0.05%) cream compared to betamethasone valerate (0.12%) cream in the treatment of steroid-responsive dermatoses: a multicentric study

Fluticasone propionate is a new topical steroid developed as a result of modification of the 19-carbon androstane structure. In the present study, efficacy of this steroid was compared with betamethasone valerate cream in patients with psoriasis and eczema. Though fluticasone propionate was marginally more effective than betamethasone valerate, this difference was not statistically significant.     

Skin physiological parameters confirm the therapeutic efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis

Abstract:  In this double-blind, within-patient vehicle-controlled study, patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) were treated for 3 weeks twice daily with pimecrolimus cream 1% on one forearm and with vehicle cream on the other forearm. Efficacy of treatment was assessed clinically using the Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI), the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) and the pruritus visual analogue scale. In parallel, blood microcirculation in the skin was measured as an objective parameter for skin inflammation. Skin hydration and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were monitored as parameter relevant for the barrier function. Treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% resulted in a quick and marked improvement of signs and symptoms of AD and a significant reduction of microcirculation from 33.90 to 15.55 AU ( P  < 0.0001). Skin hydration increased continually from 42.86 to 52.69 AU ( P  = 0.002) and TEWL decreased from 35.30 to 21.50 g/m²/h ( P  = 0.001), indicating restoration of skin barrier. At vehicle-treated sites changes of skin physiological parameters were less pronounced and observed only initially with later plateau or even reversal. At the end of the study, there were significant differences for all measured skin physiological parameters between pimecrolimus cream 1% and vehicle: microcirculation 12.15 AU ( P  = 0.004), skin hydration 7.12 AU ( P  = 0.002), TEWL 11.38 g/m²/h ( P  = 0.004). Non-invasive evaluation of microcirculation and barrier functionality thus represent a valuable tool for the objective assessment of treatment response to pimecrolimus cream 1%.     

Pimecrolimus cream 1% for papulopustular rosacea: a randomized vehicle-controlled double-blind trial

BACKGROUND: Rosacea remains difficult to treat, despite many therapeutic options. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel; Novartis Pharma, Nuremberg, Germany) in the treatment of papulopustular rosacea. METHODS: Forty patients with rosacea (25 men and 15 women, mean age 58 years) were enrolled in a randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blind study. For 4-8 weeks, patients applied pimecrolimus cream or vehicle twice daily to the involved areas on the face. Rosacea severity score, subjective severity assessment and quality of life assessment were obtained, along with photographic documentation. RESULTS: Both treatment groups of 20 patients showed an improvement after 4 weeks. The differences were not significant (P > 0 x 05) with regard to mean absolute values, mean percentage changes from baseline, or mean absolute values as differences from baseline for the total score or scores of the different clinical signs (erythema, papulation, scaling and pustules). In the subjective severity score and the quality of life assessment, there was also no significant difference between pimecrolimus and the vehicle (P > 0 x 05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of rosacea for 4-8 weeks with the topical calcineurin inhibitor pimecrolimus cream 1% was not more efficacious than treatment with the vehicle cream.     

Blood concentrations, tolerability and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% in Japanese infants and children with atopic dermatitis

Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a topical calcineurin inhibitor for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Minimal systemic exposure to pimecrolimus has been previously observed in Caucasian pediatric patients treated with the cream twice daily for up to 1 year. The objective of this open-label, non-comparative, multicenter study was to assess the systemic exposure, tolerability and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% when used twice daily for 3 weeks in pediatric patients of Japanese background. The patient cohort consisted of 17 Japanese infants and children (age range, 3.6 months to 11.6 years) with atopic dermatitis of at least mild severity affecting >or=10% of the total body surface area (range, 10-48%). Pimecrolimus cream 1% was applied twice daily for 3 weeks. Blood levels of pimecrolimus were determined on days 1, 10 and 22. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring adverse events, laboratory parameters, physical condition and vital signs. Efficacy parameters included the Eczema Area and Severity Index, the Investigators' Global Assessment and the pruritus score. The median exposure to pimecrolimus cream 1% was 22 treatment days (range, 9-29 treatment days). Pimecrolimus blood concentrations were <0.5 ng/mL in 94% of samples on day 1, in 93% of samples on day 10 and in 100% of samples on day 22, with no indication of an increase with increasing body surface area treated (up to 48% of the total body surface area). No drug-related systemic adverse events or serious adverse events were reported. Treatment was effective according to all efficacy parameters. The findings of this study indicate that the use of pimecrolimus cream 1% results in minimal systemic absorption of the active ingredient in pediatric patients of Japanese background with extensive disease.     

Occlusive treatment of chronic hand dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1% results in low systemic exposure,is well tolerated,safe, and effective. An open study

BACKGROUND: Pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981) is a novel, non-steroid inflammatory cytokine inhibitor, effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Here, we evaluate the treatment of chronic hand dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1%. OBJECTIVES: To determine pimecrolimus blood concentrations, and evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy following application of pimecrolimus cream 1% to subjects with chronic hand dermatitis. METHOD: In this open-label, multiple-topical-dose, non-controlled, pharmacokinetic study, pimecrolimus cream 1% was applied twice daily to dorsal and palmar areas (affected and unaffected) of both hands. Evening applications (except day 8) were immediately followed by overnight occlusion (> or =6 h). Full pharmacokinetic profile (days 1, 8 and 22), trough concentrations (days 3 and 15), physical examinations, laboratory measurements and adverse events were recorded. Efficacy was assessed via Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA), total key signs and symptoms and the subject's overall self-assessment. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed the study. The majority of pimecrolimus blood concentrations (73.6%) remained below the limit of quantitation (0.1 ng/ml). The maximum concentration observed was 0.91 ng/ml and the maximum area under the concentration-time curve from 0-12 h post dose was 7.6 ng.h/ml. Treatment was well tolerated locally and systemically. No serious adverse events occurred; 4/13 subjects showed a total of 6 adverse events at the application site: burning (n=4), and pruritus (n=2). No clinically relevant or drug-related changes were observed. Clear efficacy of the treatment was shown by all 3 assessment methods. Disease state at day 22 had improved in 11 (85%) subjects compared with baseline (IGA). CONCLUSION: Twice daily topical treatment of moderate to severe chronic hand dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1% results in low pimecrolimus blood levels, is well tolerated, safe, and effective.     

Control of atopic eczema with pimecrolimus cream 1% under daily practice conditions: results of a > 2000 patient study

Background Pimecrolimus cream 1% has been shown to effectively control atopic eczema (AE) when applied twice daily from the first signs or symptoms of AE until clearance. Moreover, pimecrolimus cream 1% has a favourable safety profile, lacking topical corticosteroid‐related side‐effects such as skin atrophy, making it particularly useful to treat delicate body regions (e.g. the face). Objective The objective of this naturalistic study was to monitor the safety, tolerability and efficacy of pimecrolimus when used in the long‐term management of AE in a real‐life setting. Methods A multicentre, open‐label study was conducted in 2034 patients aged ≥ 3 months with mild to moderate AE for up to 12 months’ duration. Patients applied pimecrolimus cream twice daily, initiating treatment at first signs or symptoms of AE, continuing until clearance. Results Patients (n= 1847; 91%) completed 3 months of the study. Treatment success (clear or almost clear AE) after 3 months of treatment was observed on the whole body in 59% of patients and on the face in 81% of patients. Disease improvement of whole body and face was seen in 77% and 63% of patients, respectively. Pruritus was absent or mild in 79% of patients. Pimecrolimus cream was well tolerated throughout the study. Conclusion In a daily practice setting, pimecrolimus cream 1% effectively and safely controls AE.     

A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, split-face study with pimecrolimus cream 1% for papulopustular rosacea

Background Rosacea is a common inflammatory skin disorder for which the pathogenesis is unclear. Currently, there is no cure for rosacea, and it seems that standard therapies have focused mainly on minimizing inflammation. Objectives The aim of this study is to investigate the potential efficacy, tolerability and safety profile of 1% pimecrolimus cream for the treatment of rosacea. Methods Twenty‐five patients with papulopustular rosacea were enrolled to a randomized, single‐blinded, placebo‐controlled, split‐face trial of pimecrolimus cream 1% consisting 4 week treatment and 2 week follow‐up period. The patients were instructed to apply first the ‘left side cream’ labelled placebo cream (Ultrabase cream, Intendis GmbH, Berlin, Germany) to the left hemi‐face then the ‘right side cream’ labelled 1% pimecrolimus cream (Elidel; Novartis Pharma, Nuremberg, Germany) to the right hemi‐face, twice daily. They were informed to apply a standard amount of each cream with the fingertip‐unit and not allowed to use any other agent concomittantly other than sunblock. Clinical evaluation and subjective severity assessment were obtained along with photographic documentation at baseline, first, second, and fourth weeks of the therapy and at the follow‐up visit. Rosacea severity score for each sign of erythema, papules, pustules, oedema, and telengiectesia were graded from 0 to 3. Patients were questioned for the subjective symptoms, overall improvement on appearance and side‐effects. Results Twenty‐four patients completed the study with an exceptional compliance and tolerable safety profile. One patient withdrew from the study due to severe flare‐up reaction affecting both hemi‐faces. The mean baseline total rosacea severity scores were 5.06 + 1.29 for both sides and reduced to 2.5 ± 1.06 vs. 3.25 ± 1.24 on pimecrolimus vs. placebo applied sides without the significance (P = 0.06). There was not any significant difference concerning each rosacea sign scores and total rosacea severity scores except for the significant improvement in erythema score and total rosacea severity score obtained on the pimecrolimus‐applied hemi‐face at 2nd week of therapy (P =0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). The reduction rates of the mean subjective severity scores at 4th week were 49.77% vs. 38.89% for pimecrolimus vs. placebo, respectively, without a statistical significance (P = 0.15). Subjective symptoms responded well in 54.16% of patients concerning pimecrolimus application compared with 12.50% for the placebo application. The side‐effects were mostly transient local irritations. Conclusion Our data implicated that pimecrolimus cream is not superior to placebo except for its efficacy on erythema. We believe that pimecrolimus cream can be a treatment option for rosacea patients with high erythema score for whom an initial accelerated improvement is needed. We believe further studies with topical pimecrolimus cream on larger study groups with different subtypes and severity of rosacea will clarify the potential effect of pimecrolimus cream for the treatment of rosacea.     

Management of eczematous dermatitis with amcinonide or betamethasone valerate. A double-blind comparative study.

A new topical corticosteroid formulation, 0.1 percent amcinonide cream, was compared with 0.1 percent betamethasone valerate cream in a double-blind, parallel study of the management of eczematous dermatitis. Both treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement in most symptoms and in overall disease status after one and two weeks of treatment. The amcinonide group had greater improvement in individual symptoms and significantly greater overall improvement than did the betamethasone valerate group. Side effects were few and minor in both groups. The amcinonide cream was found to be both safe and effective for the management of eczematous dermatitis.     

A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of a fixed triple combination (fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, hydroquinone 4%, tretinoin 0.05%) compared with hydroquinone 4% cream in Asian patients with moderate to severe melasma

Background  Melasma is an acquired, chronic hypermelanosis for which therapy remains a challenge.
Objectives  To compare the efficacy and safety of a triple combination [TC: fluocinolone acetonide 0·01%, hydroquinone (HQ) 4%, tretinoin 0·05%] vs. HQ 4% after 8 weeks of treatment of moderate to severe facial melasma in Asian patients.
Methods  This was a multicentre, randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded, parallel comparison study. East and South-East Asian patients aged 18 years or older, with a clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe melasma, were enrolled in this study. Patients were enrolled at baseline and treated daily for 8 weeks with TC cream (one application at bedtime) or HQ cream (twice daily). There were four study visits: at baseline and weeks 2, 4 and 8. The primary efficacy variable was the melasma global severity score (GSS). Other outcome measures included Melasma Area and Severity Index, global improvement and patient satisfaction. Safety was assessed through the reporting of adverse events.
Results  TC had superior efficacy to HQ for the primary variable: 77/120 patients (64·2%) on TC had GSS 'none' or 'mild' at week 8 vs. 48/122 patients (39·4%) on HQ ( P  < 0·001). The secondary efficacy variables confirmed these results. Patient satisfaction was in favour of TC (90/127, 70·8%, vs. 64/129, 49·6%; P  = 0·005). More patients had related adverse events on TC (63/129, 48·8%) than on HQ (18/131, 13·7%) but most were mild and none was severe.
Conclusions  Efficacy in Asians and patient satisfaction were superior with the fixed TC than with HQ 4%.     

An exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% for the treatment of pityriasis alba

BACKGROUND: Use of topical corticosteroids for the treatment of pityriasis alba is limited by their potential side-effects, such as skin atrophy especially with long-term use on the face. Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a topical calcineurin inhibitor that has anti-inflammatory properties, lacks the cutaneous side-effects associated with steroids, and provide a potential benefit for the treatment of pityriasis alba. METHODS: This 10-patient, prospective, single-arm, open-label, single-center, 12-week, investigator-initiated proof of concept study assessed the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptance of pimecrolimus cream 1% twice daily. In addition to pimecrolimus cream, patients used facial emollient containing SPF 15 sunscreen and mild soap-free cleanser. Efficacy assessments were Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) of disease severity and evaluation of uneven skin color, scaling, eczema, follicular keratosis, and pruritus. All efficacy assessments were reported on a 4-point scale (0 = none to 3 = severe). RESULTS: Of the 10 patients enrolled (aged: 12-35 years), all had intensive sun-exposure, 90% had skin type IV-V, and 80% completed the 12-week treatment. At baseline, mean IGA was 1.20 (mild-moderate), uneven skin color was 2.3 (moderate-severe) and scaling was 1.2 (mild). IGA decreased to 0.25 by week 12, uneven skin color improved by week 3 with near complete resolution by week 12 (mean = 0.38) and scaling resolved at week 3. Pruritus, eczema, and follicular keratosis remained at low levels from baseline throughout the course of the study. Patients consistently reported satisfaction with the treatment ("satisfied" or "very satisfied"). No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Pimecrolimus cream 1% may represent an alternative for the treatment of pityriasis alba.