Angiographic and clinical outcomes in elderly subjects treated with percutaneous coronary intervention following fibrinolytic administration for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Background Prior studies have demonstrated that the achievement of faster coronary artery flow following reperfusion therapies is associated with improved outcomes among ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. The association of patient age with angiographic characteristics of flow and perfusion after rescue/adjunctive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following the administration of fibrinolytic therapy has not been previously investigated. Objectives and Methods We examined the association between age (≥70 years or < 70years) and clinical and angiographic outcomes in 1472 STEMI patients who underwent rescue/adjunctive PCI following fibrinolytic therapy in 7 TIMI trials. We hypothesized that elderly patients would have slower post-PCI epicardial flow and worsened outcomes compared to younger patients. Results The 218 patients aged≥70 years (14.8%) had more comorbidities than younger patients. Although these patients had significant angiographic improvement in TTMI frame counts and rates of TIMI Grade 3 flow following rescue/adjunctive PCI, elderly patients had higher (slower) post-PCI TTMI frame counts compared to the younger cohort (25 vs 22 frames, P = 0.039) , and less often achieved post-PCI TTMI Grade 3 flow (80.1 vs 86.4% , P = 0.017). The association between age (≥70 years) and slower post-PCI flow was independent of gender, time to treatment, left anterior descending (LAD) lesion location, and pulse and blood pressure on admission. Elderly patients also had 4-fold higher mortality at 30 days (12.0 vs 2.7% , P = 0. 001). Conclusions This study suggests one possible mechanism underlying worsened outcomes among elderly STEMI patients insofar as advanced chronological age was associated with higher TTMI frame counts and less frequent TIMI Grade 3 flow after rescue/adjunctive PCI. (J Geriatr Gardiol 2005;2(1) :10-14)     

Angiographic and clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions following combined fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION: Combined therapy with fibrinolytic agent and platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor not followed by an interventional procedure does not improve prognosis in patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when compared to fibrinolysis alone. On the other hand, in the past percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed after fibrinolysis were associated with low angiographic efficacy, a high risk of bleeding and a high rate of early cardiovascular events. Aim: Evaluation of angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI treated with PCI following combined fibrinolytic therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Complete angiographic and clinical data of 187 patients who underwent PCI immediately after combined fibrinolytic therapy were obtained from a survey of 669 consecutive patients with STEMI <12 hours, at age <75 years, without cardiogenic shock, who were transferred from regional hospitals to the catheterisation laboratory within 90 minutes and after the initiation of combined fibrinolytic therapy (alteplase 15 mg iv as a bolus followed by an infusion of 35 mg over 60 minutes; abciximab iv bolus of 0.25 mg/kg followed by a 12 h infusion of 0.125 microg/kg per minute; unfractionated heparin). At baseline angiographic examination revealed no flow (TIMI 0+1) in the infarct-related artery in 17.1% of patients, impaired flow (TIMI 2) in 17.1% and normal (TIMI 3) in 65.8% of cases. After immediate PCI, a significant improvement in epicardial perfusion (TIMI 2+3, 99.5%) and in microcirculation was achieved. This favourable effect was seen only in the group of patients with baseline TIMI 0+1 flow, whereas PCI in the group with baseline TIMI 3 flow did not cause any further improvement in microcirculatory perfusion. The rate of cardiovascular events within the first 30 days and 12 months after the procedures were similar in the studied subgroup of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PCI performed after combined fibrinolytic therapy in STEMI patients is associated with high efficacy and improvement in indices of epicardial perfusion and microcirculation. These benefits are confined mainly to patients with primarily impaired flow in the infarction-related artery (TIMI 0+1). However, the clinical results of this strategy, particularly in patients undergoing PCI following successful combined fibrinolytic therapy, must still be proved in further randomised trials.     

Early coronary intervention following pharmacologic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (the combined TIMI 10B-TIMI 14 experience).

Earlier studies have suggested that immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with an increase in adverse events and that routine PCI in this setting has offered no advantage over a conservative strategy. To reassess this issue in a more recent era, we evaluated 1,938 patients from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 10B and 14 trials of AMI. Patients in TIMI 10B were randomized to receive tissue plasminogen activator or TNK tissue plasminogen activator, whereas patients in TIMI 14B trial were randomized to receive thrombolytic therapy with or without abciximab. All patients underwent angiography 90 minutes after receiving pharmacologic therapy. Patients who underwent PCI were classified as having undergone a rescue procedure (TIMI 0 or 1 flow at 90 minutes), an adjunctive procedure (TIMI 2 or 3 flow at 90 minutes), or a delayed procedure (performed >150 minutes after symptom onset, median of 2.75 days). Among patients with TIMI 0 or 1 flow, there was a trend for lower 30-day mortality among patients who underwent rescue PCI than among those who did not (6% vs 17%, p = 0.01, adjusted p = 0.28). Patients who underwent adjunctive PCI had similar 30-day mortality and/or reinfarction as those who underwent delayed PCI. In a multivariate model both had lower 30-day mortality and/or reinfarction than patients with "successful thrombolysis" (i.e., TIMI 3 flow at 90 minutes) who did not undergo revascularization (p = 0.02). Thus, early PCI following AMI is associated with excellent outcomes. Randomized trials of an early invasive strategy following thrombolysis are warranted.     

A meta-analysis of randomized trials of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after failed fibrinolysis

Previous trials have suggested clinical benefit with rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after failed fibrinolysis, but more recent, larger studies are conflicting. Therefore, we designed a meta-analysis to determine whether rescue PCI improves outcomes compared with conservative therapy in the setting of early failure of fibrinolysis. We searched MEDLINE for randomized trials by using the Medical Subject Heading terms "angioplasty," "myocardial infarction," "thrombolytic therapy," and "fibrinolysis." The inclusion criteria were (1) acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction initially treated with fibrinolytics, (2) randomization of patients with failed fibrinolysis to immediate PCI or conservative therapy, and (3) available short-term clinical outcome data. The primary end point was short-term mortality and secondary end points were thromboembolic stroke and heart failure. Numbers of events were tabulated for each trial and risk ratios (RRs) were computed. Five trials were included for analysis. The pooled RR estimates showed a 36% decrease in the risk of death in the rescue arm (RR 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 1.00, p=0.048) and a marginally significant 28% decrease in the risk of heart failure (RR 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.01, p=0.06). We also found a marginally increased risk of thromboembolic stroke in the rescue arm (RR 3.61, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 14.27, p=0.07). In conclusion, rescue PCI in the setting of early fibrinolytic failure improves mortality, but this is tempered by a possible increase in the risk of thromboembolic stroke.     

Facilitation of early percutaneous coronary intervention after reteplase with or without abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results from the SPEED (GUSTO-4 Pilot) Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the utility of early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a trial that encouraged its use after thrombolysis and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition for acute myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND: Early PCI has shown no benefit when performed early after thrombolysis alone. METHODS: We studied 323 patients (61%) who underwent PCI with planned initial angiography, at a median 63 min after reperfusion therapy began. A blinded core laboratory reviewed cineangiograms. Ischemic events, bleeding, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes were compared between early PCI and no-PCI patients (n = 162), between patients with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0 or 1 before PCI versus flow grade 2 or 3, and among three treatment regimens. RESULTS: Early PCI patients showed a procedural success (<50% residual stenosis and TIMI flow grade 3) rate of 88% and a 30-day composite incidence of death, reinfarction, or urgent revascularization of 5.6%. These patients had fewer ischemic events and bleeding complications (15%) than did patients not undergoing early PCI (30%, p = 0.001). Early PCI was used more often in patients with initial TIMI flow grade 0 or 1 versus flow grade 2 or 3 (83% vs. 60%, p < 0.0001). Patients receiving abciximab with reduced-dose reteplase (5 U double bolus) showed an 86% incidence of TIMI grade 3 flow at approximately 90 min and a trend toward improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, early PCI facilitated by a combination of abciximab and reduced-dose reteplase was safe and effective. This approach has several advantages for acute MI patients, which should be confirmed in a dedicated, randomized trial.     

Systematic review of fibrinolytic-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention: Potential benefits and future challenges

BACKGROUND:

Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is defined as the administration of fibrinolytic therapy and/or glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors to minimize myocardial ischemia time while waiting for PCI. A pooled meta-analysis suggested that facilitated PCI was associated with higher rates of mortality and morbidity compared with nonfacilitated PCI.

OBJECTIVE:

The heterogeneous and complex trials of facilitated PCI were systematically reviewed to identify where this strategy may be beneficial and deserving of further research.

METHODS:

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane database, the Internet and conference proceedings were searched to obtain relevant trials. Human studies that randomly assigned patients to fibrinolytic-facilitated PCI (administration of fibrinolytic therapy alone or in combination with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors before angiography) versus nonfacilitated PCI were included.

RESULTS:

Nine trials encompassing 3836 patients were reviewed. The facilitated PCI strategy was fibrinolytic therapy alone in seven trials and half-dose fibrinolytic therapy plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in two trials. In patients who had fibrinolysis less than 2 h after symptom onset (mainly in the prehospital setting) and/or slightly delayed PCI 3 h to 24 h after fibrinolysis, facilitated PCI was associated with the greatest Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow and a trend toward reduced mortality. Overall, facilitated PCI was associated with increased intracranial hemorrhage and reinfarction. Combining half-dose fibrinolytic therapy and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduced reinfarction but increased major bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS:

Facilitated PCI cannot be recommended outside of experimental protocols at this time. Further research should focus on selecting patients with higher benefit-to-risk ratios and performing prehospital fibrinolysis with optimal antiplatelet or antithrombin therapy, as well as slightly delayed PCI in patients who are stable or geographically removed from PCI facilities.     

Prehospital fibrinolytic therapy for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction

Despite advances in medications and interventional techniques, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a major cause of mortality in the United States. Reducing the time from the onset of symptoms to reperfusion (ischemic time) is the major determinant for mortality reduction. An ongoing controversy exists regarding whether there is more benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) preceded by prehospital fibrinolytic treatment (facilitated PCI) compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients with STEMI. In different clinical trials, prehospital fibrinolysis markedly reduced the time from symptom onset to treatment, allowing earlier ST-segment elevation resolution and higher initial thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow rates compared with PPCI. After prehospital fibrinolysis, patients who had subsequent PCI had lower in-hospital mortality rates and higher 1-year survival rates compared with those who underwent PPCI. In contrast, fulldose fibrinolytic agents without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors immediately followed by PCI may increase major adverse events and should not be used.     

Long-term clinical outcomes after rescue angioplasty are not different from those of successful thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: The long-term value of rescue percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who received thrombolytic therapy but failed to achieve early recanalization of the artery is still debated. This study aimed to compare long-term outcomes after successful thrombolysis vs. systematic attempted rescue PTCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 362 consecutive patients with STEMI hospitalized within 6 h of symptom onset and treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy were studied. Of these, 345 underwent coronary angiography within 90 min. Sixty per cent of patients achieved TIMI 3 flow and were treated medically; the in-hospital death rate in this group was 4%. Nine per cent of patients had TIMI 2 flow and 31% TIMI 0-1 flow. In this latter group, rescue PTCA was attempted in 85.8% with a hospital death rate of 5.5% (20% with failed vs. 4% with successful rescue PTCA, P=0.03). Eight year actuarial survival without recurrent myocardial infarction was no different in patients who had successful thrombolytic therapy and in patients with attempted rescue PTCA [78 and 95% CI (71-85) vs. 78 and 95% CI (68-87), respectively, hazard ratio: 0.93 (0.52-1.65), P=0.80]. Total mortality, cardiac mortality, and other composite endpoints also did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Routine attempted rescue PTCA 90 min after thrombolytic therapy in patients with persistent occlusion of the infarct-related vessels achieves long-term clinical outcomes which do not differ from those obtained by successful thrombolysis.     

Percutaneous thrombectomy with the RESCUE system in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation (STEMI) are associated with distal coronary embolisation. It may be speculated that percutaneous thrombectomy preceding stent implantation may prevent coronary microcirculation from embolisation. AIM: To assess safety and efficacy of percutaneous thrombectomy in patients with STEMI. METHODS: Seventy two patients with STEMI were randomised to PCI with stent implantation alone (n=32) or percutaneous thrombectomy with the RESCUE system, followed by stent implantation (n=40). Coronary flow in infarct related artery before and after the procedure was assessed using TIMI scale and corrected TIMI frame count - cTFC. Myocardial blood flow was measured using TIMI myocardial perfusion grade - tMPG. The degree of ST segment resolution 60 min after PCI was also assessed. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured in hospital and three months later. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ with respect to the time from the onset of symptoms to the procedure (236+/-162 min vs 258+/-198 min, NS) or the baseline TIMI, cTFC and tMPG values. An effective thrombectomy procedure was performed in 35 (87%) patients from group B. After the procedure, the number of patients with TIMI 3 grade as well as cTFC values and the proportion of patients with tMPG 3 were similar in both groups (86% vs 85%, NS; 19 vs 21, NS; and 38% vs 54%, NS). The sum of ST segment elevations after the procedure was significantly greater in patients who underwent PCI only compared with patients who had thrombectomy and PCI (6.8+/-5.2 mm vs 3.6+/-2.9 mm, p=0.004). Complete normalisation of ST segment was achieved in 68% of patients treated with thrombectomy and PCI compared with 25% of patients who had PCI only (p=0.005). CK-MB peak values occurred significantly earlier in patients treated with thrombectomy (92.1% vs 66.7% up to 360 min, p=0.01). After 3 months of follow-up, LVEF tended to be greater in patients treated with thrombectomy and PCI than in those who underwent PCI only (55.3+/-14.7% vs 60.3+/-9.2%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombectomy with the RESCUE system in patients with STEMI is safe and effectively restores patency of infarct related artery. Thrombectomy better improves myocardial perfusion than standard PCI.     

Facilitated PCI: Ist das Konzept gescheitert?

BACKGROUND: Direct percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be considered the gold standard of reperfusion therapy. For patients with need for transfer, the question of antithrombotic pretreatment arises. CONCEPT OF FACILITATED PCI: With the concept of facilitated PCI the advantages of fibrinolysis, namely the rapid and ubiquitous availability, should be combined with the advantages of immediate PCI. With a pretreatment using fibrinolytics, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) or the combination of both (in that case a fibrinolytic in half dosage only), it was aimed to achieve reperfusion before a planned PCI. Facilitated PCI was expected to improve the rate of open vessels prior to PCI, thereby reducing infarct size, improving clinical outcome, and the success rate of PCI. CLINICAL TRIALS: The concept of facilitated PCI was evaluated in two major randomized trials (ASSENT-4 PCI, FINESSE) as well as in one meta-analysis. Despite an increase of 20% of patients with patent infarct-related arteries (TIMI 3) before PCI, the clinical outcome, especially mortality, reinfarction rate and heart failure rate, did not improve. Moreover, the bleeding rate increased and even a higher rate of cerebral bleeds was seen, predominantly with full-dose fibrinolysis. POSSIBLE REASONS FOR THE LACK OF SUCCESS WITH FACILITATED PCI: Patency (TIMI 3) of the coronary arteries was 20% higher in the facilitated PCI arms of the trials. However, all patients were at risk of bleeding complications. Also the inclusion of patients with myocardial infarction in a later phase and the inclusion of patients at lower risk may have contributed to the somewhat disappointing results of facilitated PCI. GUIDELINES: Recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines recommend facilitated PCI (class IIb), if all of the following criteria are met: (1) patients at high risk, (2) PCI not available within 90 min, (3) low risk of bleed. A planned reperfusion strategy using full-dose fibrinolysis followed by immediate PCI may be harmful (class III). In addition, a further restriction to patients in the early phase of myocardial infarction (< 3 h) should be considered. In the small subset of carefully selected patients, a combination of GPI and half-dose fibrinolytic could be appropriate.     

Abciximab and early adjunctive percutaneous coronary intervention are associated with improved ST-segment resolution after thrombolysis: Observations from the TIMI 14 Trial

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical outcomes in selected patients with failed thrombolysis but has not been proven to benefit patients who achieve a patent infarct-related artery. Even after successful epicardial reperfusion, myocardial perfusion may be inadequate. We sought to evaluate whether a strategy that uses a reperfusion regimen containing abciximab and a reduced-dose thrombolytic agent (combination therapy), followed by early adjunctive PCI, would result in improved myocardial perfusion, as assessed by ST-segment resolution. METHODS: ST resolution from 90 to 180 minutes after therapy was calculated for all 410 patients from the TIMI 14 trial who had evaluable electrocardiograms at both time points and who were treated with alteplase or reteplase. Patients were grouped according to whether they were treated with combination therapy or full-dose thrombolytic agent alone and whether they underwent PCI between the 90- and 180-minute electrocardiographic measurements. RESULTS: Among 105 patients who underwent adjunctive PCI between 90 and 180 minutes, mean ST resolution from 90 to 180 minutes was significantly greater in those who had received combination therapy versus those who had received full-dose thrombolytic alone (54% vs 8%; P =.002). Among 241 patients with TIMI grade 3 flow in the infarct-related artery at 90 minutes, adjunctive PCI significantly improved mean ST resolution in patients who had been treated with combination therapy (57% [PCI] vs 24% [no PCI]; P =.006), but PCI did not have this effect in patients who had received thrombolytic therapy alone (1% [PCI] vs 10% [no PCI]; P =.70). In a multivariate model controlling for factors that would be expected to independently influence 90- to 180-minute ST resolution, abciximab treatment remained significantly associated with greater ST resolution (P =.008). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy that uses a combination reperfusion regimen that includes abciximab, followed by early adjunctive PCI, is associated with greater ST-segment resolution, which may reflect enhanced tissue level and microvascular perfusion. Future studies should evaluate prospectively the clinical efficacy of this strategy.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis: a multiple meta-analyses approach according to the type of strategy.

OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials that enrolled ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with fibrinolysis to assess the potential benefits of: 1) rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus no PCI; 2) systematic and early (< or =24 h) PCI versus delayed or ischemia-guided PCI; 3) fibrinolysis-facilitated PCI versus primary PCI alone. BACKGROUND: The impact of PCI strategies after fibrinolysis on mortality or reinfarction remains to be established. METHODS: The meta-analysis was performed using the odds ratio (OR) as the parameter of efficacy with a random effect model. Fifteen randomized trials (5,253 patients) were selected. The primary end point was mortality or the combined end point of death or reinfarction. RESULTS: Rescue PCI for failed fibrinolysis reduced mortality (6.9% vs. 10.7%) (OR, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.99; p = 0.055) and the rate of death or reinfarction (10.8% vs. 16.8%) (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.89; p = 0.012) compared with a conservative approach. Systematic and early PCI performed during the "stent era" led to a nonsignificant reduction in mortality compared with delayed or ischemia-guided PCI (3.8% vs. 6.7%) (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.05; p = 0.07) and to a 2-fold reduction in the rate of death or reinfarction (7.5% vs. 13.2%) (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.83; p = 0.0067). This benefit contrasted with a nonsignificant increase in the rate of both mortality (5.5% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.33) or death or reinfarction (9.6% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.06) observed in the "balloon era." Fibrinolysis-facilitated PCI was associated with more reinfarction as compared with primary PCI alone (5.0% vs. 3.0%) (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.51; p = 0.013) without significant impact on mortality (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.83; p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support rescue PCI and systematic and early PCI after fibrinolysis. However, the current data do not support fibrinolysis-facilitated PCI in lieu of primary PCI alone.     

Association of duration of symptoms at presentation with angiographic and clinical outcomes after fibrinolytic therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if an underlying mechanism of the association between prolonged symptom-to-treatment times and adverse outcomes may be an association of symptom-to-treatment times with impaired Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction myocardial perfusion grades (TMPGs). BACKGROUND: Prolonged symptom duration among ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing fibrinolytic therapy is associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS: Angiography was performed 60 min after fibrinolytic administration in 3,845 Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial patients. RESULTS: The median time from symptom onset to treatment was longer among patients with impaired myocardial perfusion (3.0 h for TMPG 0/1 vs. 2.7 h for TMPG 2/3; p = 0.001). In a multivariate model, impaired tissue perfusion (TMPG 0/1) remained associated with increased time to treatment (odds ratio 1.14 per hour of delay; p = 0.007) even after adjusting for Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade (TFG) 3, left anterior descending infarct location, and baseline clinical characteristics. Impaired myocardial perfusion after rescue/adjunctive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was associated with longer median times to treatment (3.0 h for TMPG 2/3 vs. 2.7 h for TMPG 0/1; p = 0.017), as was abnormal epicardial flow after rescue/adjunctive PCI (3.3 h for TFG 0/1/2 vs. 2.8 h for TFG 3; p = 0.005). Thirty-day mortality was associated with longer time from onset of symptoms to treatment (6.6% mortality for time to treatment >4 h vs. 3.3%; p < 0.001), even among patients undergoing rescue PCI. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged symptom to treatment time among STEMI patients is associated with impaired myocardial perfusion independent of epicardial flow both immediately after fibrinolytic administration and after rescue/adjunctive PCI. These data provide a pathophysiologic link between prolonged symptoms due to vessel occlusion, impaired myocardial perfusion, and poor clinical outcomes.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate whether enoxaparin (ENOX) is superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) as adjunctive therapy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who receive fibrinolytic therapy and subsequently undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by analyzing data from the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 (Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 25) trial. BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the use of ENOX compared with UFH as adjunctive therapy in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy and subsequent PCI. METHODS: A total of 20,479 STEMI patients who received fibrinolytic therapy were randomized to a strategy of ENOX throughout index hospitalization or UFH for at least 48 h, with blinded study drug to continue if PCI was performed. The primary end point of death or recurrent MI through 30 days was compared for ENOX versus UFH among the patients who underwent subsequent PCI (n = 4,676). RESULTS: After initial fibrinolysis, fewer patients underwent PCI through 30 days in the ENOX versus the UFH group (22.8% vs. 24.2%; p = 0.027). Among patients who underwent PCI by 30 days, the primary end point occurred in 10.7% of ENOX and 13.8% of UFH patients (0.77 relative risk; p < 0.001). There were no differences in major bleeding for ENOX versus UFH (1.4% vs. 1.6%; p = NS). Results were similar when PCI was carried out in patients receiving blinded study drug during PCI (n = 2,178). CONCLUSION: Among patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy for STEMI who underwent subsequent PCI, ENOX administration was associated with a reduced risk of death or recurrent MI without difference in the risk of major bleeding. The strategy of ENOX support for fibrinolytic therapy followed by PCI is superior to UFH and provides a seamless transition from the medical management to the interventional management phase of STEMI without the need for introducing a second anticoagulant in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.     

Facilitated PCI by combination fibrinolysis or upstream tirofiban in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the Alteplase and Tirofiban in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ATAMI) trial

Direct percutaneous coronary intervention is the generally accepted superior strategy in acute ST-segment myocardial infarction. The concept of facilitating PCI in order to overcome delay by door-to-balloon time or transport is nevertheless of interest. Combination fibrinolysis guarantees higher rates of open infarct-related vessels and reduced reocclusion but without reduction of mortality. After a pilot trial of facilitated PCI by combination fibrinolysis in 39 patients with excellent efficacy and high safety we prospectively randomised 151 patients (96 males, mean age 67.4+/-8.7 years) to combination fibrinolysis with 50 mg alteplase and tirofiban and 162 patients (103 males, mean age 65.6+/-9.4 years) to upstream tirofiban before invasive approach including PCI. TIMI 2 or 3 flow of infarct-related vessel before intervention as the primary endpoint and 30-day mortality, bleeding complication and angiographic proven stent thrombosis as secondary endpoints were assessed. 160 matched patients with acute PCI and provisional abciximab served as a control group. RESULTS: TIMI 2 or 3 flow in the infarct-related vessel could be demonstrated in 87% in the combination fibrinolysis group, in 42% in the upstream tirofiban group (p<0.0001) and 29% in the control group. 30-day mortality was 0.7% versus 5.5% (p<0.02) and 6.3% in the control group. No differences could be assessed in severe or moderate (1.3% vs 1.2% vs 1.2%) and mild bleeding complications (2% vs 1.9% vs 2.5%). Stent thrombosis occurred in none of the patients with combination fibrinolysis, in 2 patients (1.5%) in the upstream tirofiban group and in 7 cases (4.4%) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Combination fibrinolysis before PCI leads to significantly higher TIMI flow rates of the infarct-related vessel without increase in 30-day mortality or in bleeding complications. This strategy needs to be further investigated in larger trials and could optimise acute myocardial infarction management even without 24-h service of catheter laboratories.     

Anterior wall myocardial infarction in real world: Does reperfusion strategy make any differences?

Some prospective randomized trials have established the superiority of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over fibrinolytic treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). These excellent PCI results are not duplicated in smaller hospitals where there may be delays in getting the cardiac catheterization team to the laboratory. This study aimed to compare the outcome of patients with anterior wall MI, without cardiogenic shock on admission, treated with primary PCI or thrombolytic therapy, in everyday practice. The data of all patients with MI hospitalized in all coronary care units operating in Israel during three consecutive national surveys was analyzed. A total of 1,038 patients with anterior wall MI were treated by reperfusion (886 received thrombolytic therapy, 152 primary PCI). Overall, the outcome of patients treated using primary PCI was better compared to patients treated with thrombolysis, with 68% relative risk reduction of 30-day mortality (mortality at 30 days: 2% vs. 6.3%; P = 0.04). A subanalysis of patients according to age showed that the beneficial effect of primary PCI on mortality was mainly clustered among the younger. In our study, patients (especially younger than 75 years) with anterior wall MI allocated to primary PCI have a better clinical outcome.     

X-sizer for thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction improves ST-segment resolution: results of the X-sizer in AMI for negligible embolization and optimal ST resolution (X AMINE ST) trial

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare, in a prospective randomized multicenter study, the effect of adjunctive thrombectomy using X-Sizer (eV3, White Bear Lake, Minnesota) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus conventional PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for <12 h and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0 to 1. The primary end point was the magnitude of ST-segment resolution after PCI. BACKGROUND: Despite a high rate of TIMI flow grade 3 achieved by PCI in patients with AMI, myocardial reperfusion remains relatively low. Distal embolization of thrombotic materials may play a major role in this setting. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter study in patients with AMI <12 h and initial TIMI flow grade 0 to 1 who were treated with primary PCI. The magnitude of ST-segment resolution 1 h after PCI was the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were included. Treatment groups were comparable by age (61 +/- 13 years), diabetes (22%), previous MI (8%), anterior MI (52%), onset-to-angiogram (258 +/- 173 min), and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (59%). The magnitude of ST-segment resolution was greater in the X-Sizer group compared with the conventional group (7.5 vs. 4.9 mm, respectively; p = 0.033) as ST-segment resolution >50% (68% vs. 53%; p = 0.037). The occurrence of distal embolization was reduced (2% vs. 10%; p = 0.033) and TIMI flow grade 3 was obtained in 96% vs. 89%, respectively (p = 0.105). Myocardial blush grade 3 was similar (30% vs. 31%; p = NS). Six-month clinical outcome was comparable (death, 6% vs. 4% and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, 13% vs. 13%, respectively). By multivariate analysis, independent predictors of ST-segment resolution >50% were: younger age, non-anterior MI, use of the X-Sizer, and a short time interval from symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing thrombus burden with X-Sizer before stenting leads to better myocardial reperfusion, as illustrated by a reduced risk of distal embolization and better ST-segment resolution.     

Reperfusion arrhythmias: are they only a marker of epicardial reperfusion or continuing myocardial ischemia after acute myocardial infarction?

Reperfusion arrhythmias are associated with epicardial reperfusion but may also be a sign of vascular reperfusion injury which can be seen as no-reflow phenomenon on coronary angiography and predicts in-hospital complications and recovery of left ventricular (LV) function. No-reflow phenomenon (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] 相似文献   

Predictors of mortality following rescue percutaneous intervention

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Rescue percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is a mechanical reperfusion strategy aimed at achieving patency of the infarct-related artery after failed thrombolysis. However, in randomized studies the indication for rescue PTCA was per protocol rather than based on clinical criteria. The aim of this study was to determine predictors of mortality at 30 days following rescue percutaneous intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one consecutive patients who underwent rescue PTCA were included. Mean age was 61 (11) years, 80% were men and 9.8% had diabetes. RESULTS: The infarct-related artery was the left anterior descending artery in the 46.5%, and the mean percentage of stenoses was 91.0 (11.6)%. A stent was implanted in 97.2% and TIMI II-III flow was obtained in the 97.2% of the patients. Overall mortality was 9.8% at 30 days follow-up and 11.3% at 1 year follow-up. In the multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of mortality at 30 days were age (OR=1.2, 95% CI: 1.03-1.5, P=.001), Killip class III-IV (OR=20.1; 95% CI: 1.7-500; P=.003), PTCA failure (OR=indeterminate; P=.04) and left anterior descending artery involvement (OR=12.6; 95% CI: 0.7-214.9; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Rescue PTCA is effective in restoring blood flow in the infarct-related artery in the majority of patients in whom thrombolysis failed. The independent predictors of mortality were similar to those previously reported in acute myocardial infarction.