Stable secondary arrhythmias late after intraoperative radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: incidence, mechanism, and treatment

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an effective treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, secondary arrhythmias late after ablation may complicate the patient's course. We report on the incidence, mechanisms, and treatment of gap-related atrial flutter and other secondary arrhythmias during long-term follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 129 patients who underwent intraoperative RF ablation with placement of left atrial linear lesions using minimally invasive surgical techniques, secondary arrhythmias were analyzed during long-term follow-up (20 +/- 6 months). Transient atrial arrhythmias during the first 3 postoperative months were excluded. In 8 (6.2%) of 129 patients, sustained stable secondary arrhythmias were documented. Left atrial, gap-related atrial flutter was observed in 4 patients (3.1%). The flutter was treated by percutaneous RF ablation in 3 patients (2.3%) and with drugs in 1 patient (0.8%). In 2 patients (1.6%), right atrial isthmus-dependent atrial flutter occurred and was treated successfully by percutaneous RF ablation. In 2 patients (1.6%), ectopic right atrial tachycardias occurred and were treated with percutaneous RF ablation. CONCLUSION: Late after intraoperative RF ablation of atrial fibrillation, three types of stable secondary arrhythmias were observed in 6% of patients: left atrial gap-related atrial flutter, right atrial isthmus-dependent atrial flutter, and ectopic atrial tachycardia. Gaps after intraoperative RF ablation due to noncontinuous or nontransmural linear lesions may lead to stable left atrial macroreentrant tachycardias, requiring new interventional therapy.     

Catheter ablation treatment in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, controlled study (Catheter Ablation For The Cure Of Atrial Fibrillation Study).

AIMS: We conducted a multi-centre, prospective, controlled, randomized trial to investigate the adjunctive role of ablation therapy to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) relapses in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF in whom antiarrhythmic drug therapy had already failed. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and thirty seven patients were randomized to ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ablation group) or antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone (control group). In the ablation group, patients underwent cavo-tricuspid and left inferior pulmonary vein (PV)-mitral isthmus ablation plus circumferential PV ablation. The primary end-point of the study was the absence of any recurrence of atrial arrhythmia lasting >30 s in the 1-year follow-up period, after 1-month blanking period. Three (4.4%) major complications were related to ablation: one patient had a stroke during left atrium ablation, another suffered transient phrenic paralysis, and the third had a pericardial effusion which required pericardiocentesis. After 12 months of follow-up, 63/69 (91.3%) control group patients had at least one AF recurrence, whereas 30/68 (44.1%) (P<0.001) ablation group patients had atrial arrhythmia recurrence (four patients had atrial flutter, 26 patients AF). CONCLUSION: Ablation therapy combined with antiarrhythmic drug therapy is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone in preventing atrial arrhythmia recurrences in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF in whom antiarrhythmic drug therapy has already failed.     

Catheter ablation of atypical atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia within the coronary sinus after left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to describe the prevalence and ablation of coronary sinus (CS) arrhythmias after left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: The CS has been implicated in a variety of supraventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients underwent mapping and ablation of atypical flutter that developed during (n = 5) or after (n = 33) ablation for AF. Also included were two patients with focal CS arrhythmias that occurred during an AF ablation procedure. A tachycardia was considered to be originating from the CS if the post-pacing interval in the CS matched the tachycardia cycle length and/or if it terminated during ablation in the CS. RESULTS: Among the 33 patients who developed atypical flutter late after AF ablation, 9 (27%) were found to have a CS origin. Overall, 16 of the 40 patients in this study had a CS arrhythmia. The tachycardia was macro-re-entrant in 14 patients (88%) and focal in two patients. Radiofrequency ablation with an 8-mm-tip catheter was successful in 15 patients (94%) without complication. In eight patients (50%), > or = 45 W was required for successful ablation. Thirteen of the 15 patients (87%) with a successful ablation acutely remained arrhythmia-free during 5 +/- 5 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The musculature of the CS serves as a critical component of the re-entry circuit in approximately 25% of patients with atypical flutter after ablation for AF. The CS may also generate focal atrial arrhythmias that may play a role in triggering and/or maintaining AF. Catheter ablation of these arrhythmias in the CS can be performed safely.     

Time to Cardioversion of Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmias After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Long‐Term Clinical Outcome

Introduction: It is unclear whether early restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates reverse atrial remodeling and promotes long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the time to restoration of sinus rhythm after a recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia and long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm after radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. Methods and Results: Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 384 consecutive patients (age 60 ± 9 years) for paroxysmal (215 patients) or persistent AF (169 patients). Transthoracic cardioversion was performed in all 93 patients (24%) who presented with a persistent atrial arrhythmia: AF (n = 74) or atrial flutter (n = 19) at a mean of 51 ± 53 days from the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia and 88 ± 72 days from the ablation procedure. At a mean of 16 ± 10 months after the ablation procedure, 25 of 93 patients (27%) who underwent cardioversion were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. Among the 46 patients who underwent cardioversion at ≤30 days after the recurrence, 23 (50%) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. On multivariate analysis of clinical variables, time to cardioversion within 30 days after the onset of atrial arrhythmia was the only independent predictor of maintenance of sinus rhythm in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single ablation procedure (OR 22.5; 95% CI 4.87–103.88, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Freedom from AF/flutter is achieved in approximately 50% of patients who undergo cardioversion within 30 days of a persistent atrial arrhythmia after catheter ablation of AF.     

Acute effects of left atrial radiofrequency ablation on atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Acutely, when left atrial ablation is performed during atrial fibrillation (AF), the AF may persist and require cardioversion, or it may convert to sinus rhythm or to atrial tachycardia/flutter. The prevalence of these acute outcomes has not been described. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left atrial ablation, usually including encirclement of the pulmonary veins, was performed during AF in 144 patients with drug-refractory AF. Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 19 patients (13%), to left atrial tachycardia in 6 (4%), and to atrial flutter in 6 (4%). In the 6 patients with a focal atrial tachycardia, the mean cycle length was 294 +/- 45 ms. The tachycardia arose in the left atrial roof in 3 patients, the left atrial appendage in 2, and the anterior left atrium in 1. In 3 of 6 patients, the focal atrial tachycardia originated in an area that displayed a relatively short cycle length during AF. In 6 patients, AF converted to macroreentrant atrial flutter with a mean cycle length of 253 +/- 47 ms, involving the mitral isthmus in 5 patients and the septum in 1 patient. All atrial tachycardias and flutters were successfully ablated with 1 to 15 applications of radiofrequency energy. CONCLUSION: When left atrial ablation is performed during AF, the AF may convert to atrial tachycardia or flutter in approximately 10% of patients. Focal atrial tachycardias that occur during ablation of AF may be attributable to driving mechanisms that persist after AF has been eliminated, whereas atrial flutter results from incomplete ablation lines.     

心房颤动导管消融术后早期复发的直流电复律临床分析

目的对心房颤动(简称房颤)导管消融术后1个月内复发行直流电复律的患者的临床特征进行前瞻性研究。方法丙泊酚镇静、禁食状态下,单向波同步电复律,电极板置于心尖-胸骨旁右侧,能量依次采用300,360,360J。结果共入选23例患者,年龄58±13岁,房颤病史6.8±5.0年,左房直径41.9±9.8mm,左室射血分数0.58±0.11。复发心律失常中12例为心房扑动,10例为房颤,1例为房性心动过速。共进行27次电复律,19次(70.4%)即刻复律成功,其中15次1次放电复律成功。1例复律后出现窦性心动过缓伴交界心律,1例丙泊酚镇静时出现呼吸暂停。随访8.5±3.7个月,52.2%的患者为窦性心律。即刻复律成功组其远期成功率为64.7%,即刻复律失败的远期均不成功,两组间有显著性差异(P=0.014)。1次放电即可成功者远期成功率为69.2%,需要多次放电的患者远期成功率为20.0%,两组间有显著性差异(P=0.036)。结论直流电复律可安全有效地用于房颤导管消融术后早期复发的患者,即刻电复律成功是远期成功的预测因素,复律时需要多次放电的远期成功率低。     

The role of left atrial muscular bundles in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the imaging of the left atrial (LA) muscular bundle and the relationship between the bundle and inducibility of tachyarrhythmia after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). BACKGROUND: Noninducibility is used as a clinical end point of atrial substrate ablation after PVI. However, little is known about the role of the LA muscular bundles in tachyarrhythmia after PVI. METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent catheter ablation were included. Bi-atrial isochronal mapping was performed with the NavX system (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota) during sinus rhythm. After 4 PVI, inducible organized LA flutter with or without transforming to atrial fibrillation (AF) (LA flutter/AF) was ablated with additional lines at the roof and/or mitral isthmus. RESULTS: The existence of bilateral muscular bundles was an independent predictor of LA flutter/AF after PVI (p = 0.02). Patients with LA flutter/AF after PVI had a greater index of the double potentials (5.4 +/- 3.4% vs. 2.8 +/- 1.8%, p = 0.006) and interpotential interval (33 +/- 5 ms vs. 29 +/- 4 ms, p = 0.02) than without LA flutter/AF. The muscular bundles were identified in 28% patients using 16-slice multidetector computed tomography, which were identical to the isochrone map. Patients with noninducible LA flutter/AF after PVI plus the additional linear ablation had a lower recurrence rate as compared with the patients without it (19% vs. 75%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial muscular bundles may provide a conduction block line and barrier, which is important for the formation of LA flutter/AF after PVI. The noninducibility of LA flutter/AF achieved after additional linear ablation may contribute to a better outcome in RF ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.     

Regular supraventricular tachycardias associated with idiopathic atrial fibrillation

The present study analyzed the recurrence rate of idiopathic atrial fibrillation (AF) after elimination by radiofrequency ablation of the substrate for a regular tachycardia. Forty consecutive patients with idiopathic AF and a history of regular palpitations or documented regular tachyarrhythmias were prospectively included. Regular tachyarrhythmias were induced in 82.5% of patients: atrial flutter (42.4% of the inducible arrhythmias), atrial tachycardia (24.2%), atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry (18.2%), AV reentry through a concealed accessory pathway (9.1%), and AV nodal reentry associated with right atrial tachycardia (6.1%). Dual AV node physiology with single or dual AV node echoes was demonstrated in 6.1% of patients without inducible arrhythmias. During follow-up (92 +/- 11 months), AF recurred in 19.2% of patients after successful radiofrequency ablation and in 69.2% after unsuccessful or not performed procedures (p <0.05). Left atrial diameter did not change after successful ablation but increased significantly in the population without elimination of the substrate (initial diameter 37.5 +/- 2 mm, final diameter 46.4 +/- 3.2 mm; p <0.05). In conclusion, the systematic search for the substrate of regular tachyarrhythmias followed by their elimination by catheter ablation reduces the recurrence of idiopathic AF in patients with a history of regular palpitations or documented regular tachyarrhythmias.     

70岁以上心房颤动患者导管射频消融治疗临床分析

目的 分析70岁以上心房如动(房颤)患者导管射频消融治疗成功率及术后复发危险因素.方技,选择导管射频消融的70岁以上房颤患者107例,收集患者临床和电生理资料,采用Cox比例风险回归模型分析房颤消融术后复发危险因素.结果 107例患者中,阵发性房颤89例.持续性房颤18例.平均随访(25.2±11.5)个月,单次消融成...     

Efficacy and late recurrences with wide electrical pulmonary vein isolation for persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Early recurrences of atrial arrhythmia after wide electrically isolating ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are well described, but the long-term risk of recurrence for patients with persistent and permanent AF has not been studied in detail. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifty-six consecutive patients [45 men (80.4%), age 55.9 +/- 8.7 years] with persistent [39(69.6%)] or permanent [17(30.4%)] AF were followed for 21.6 +/- 8.8 months after ablation. Atrial fibrillation duration prior to ablation was 6.4 +/- 5.6 years. Electrically isolating lesions encircling the left and right pulmonary veins (PVs) in pairs were created. After 1.5 +/- 0.7 procedures, 48 (85.7%) had sinus rhythm (SR) at 21.6 +/- 8.8 months of follow-up: achieved with 1 procedure in 27 (56.3%) and without anti-arrhythmics in 30 (62.5%). Atrial fibrillation recurrence was observed in 69.6% after the first and 46.4% after the last procedure. Of those with late recurrences (>90 days) following the last procedure, most [18 (69.2%)] did not have early recurrences. Pre-procedural AF duration (P = 0.007) and female gender (P = 0.005) were independent predictors of recurrence following the last procedure. CONCLUSION: Circumferential PV isolation is effective in most patients with persistent or permanent AF. However, repeat procedures are frequently required. Late recurrences are common and not precluded by the absence of early post-procedural arrhythmias.     

Inducible supraventricular tachycardias in patients referred for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: To investigate the prevalence of underlying, inducible supraventricular arrhythmias in patients referred for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrophysiology study reports of 409 consecutive patients (18% female), aged 55 +/- 9 years, who were referred for catheter ablation of AF, were studied. At electrophysiology study, arrhythmias other than AF were induced in 31 patients (7.6%). Cavotricuspid-dependent atrial flutter was induced in 15 patients (3.7%), slow-fast atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in seven patients (1.7%), atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT) due to an accessory pathway in five patients (1.2%), and atrial tachycardia (AT) in four patients (0.98%). Specific ablation aimed at elimination of the underlying arrhythmia only was performed in 13 patients, isolation of the pulmonary veins without additional ablation in three patients, and a combined procedure was performed in the remaining 15 patients. No significant association was observed between type of induced arrhythmia and type of ablation performed (P = 0.338). Slow pathway ablation without pulmonary vein isolation was more common among patients with AVNRT (five patients, 71%). AF recurrence was higher among patients in whom atrial flutter was induced at electrophysiology study (eight patients, 53%) compared to those with AVRT (no patient), AT (no patient), or AVNRT (one patient) (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients referred for ablation of paroxysmal AF should be investigated for evidence of underlying supraventricular arrhytmias. In patients with AVNRT, slow pathway ablation may be the only procedure that is necessary for cure of AF. Inducibility of atrial flutter appears to carry an increased risk of AF recurrence regardless of whether the cavotricuspid isthmus is also ablated.     

左心房黏液瘤术后新发房性心律失常的患者行导管消融的有效性与安全性初探

目的初步探讨左心房黏液瘤外科术后新发房性心律失常的患者接受导管消融的安全性与有效性。方法回顾性选取北京安贞医院2014年9月至2019年11月左心房黏液瘤术后新发房性心律失常并接受导管消融治疗的患者9例。收集患者的基线临床数据、消融术中参数和围术期严重不良事件,并随访导管消融术后心律失常复发情况和临床预后,采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析导管消融术后窦性心律维持率。结果9例患者年龄(55.8±9.1)岁,男性3例(3/9),阵发性心房颤动(房颤)3例(3/9),心房扑动(房扑)或房性心动过速(房速)6例(6/9)。所有患者均成功完成导管消融治疗,围术期均未发生卒中、心包积液、心脏压塞、血管并发症及大出血事件。随访40.0(27.5,55.5)个月,9例患者中有6例(6/9)初次消融术后维持窦性心律,总体窦性心律维持比例为2/3。3例房颤患者中有1例(1/3)出现早期房颤复发(术后3个月),6例房速或房扑患者中有2例(2/6)房扑患者出现极晚期新发房颤和/或复发房扑(分别为术后19、29个月)。3例复发患者中有2例接受再次消融,其中1例维持窦性心律。所有患者随访期间未复发黏液瘤,未发生死亡、卒中、急性心肌梗死等事件。结论左心房黏液瘤外科术后新发房性心律失常患者接受导管消融安全、有效,可以作为一项治疗选择。     

Radiofrequency ablation for cure of atrial flutter

Abstract Background: Atrial flutter is a common arrhythmia which frequently recurs after cardioversion and is relatively difficult to control with antiarrhythmic agents.
Aims: To evaluate the success rate, recurrence rate and safety of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for atrial flutter in a consecutive series of patients with drug refractory chronic or paroxysmal forms of the arrhythmia.
Methods: Electrophysiologic evaluation of atrial flutter included activation mapping with a 20 electrode halo cadieter placed around the tricuspid annulus and entrainment mapping from within the low right atrial isthmus. After confirmation of the arrhythmia mechanism with these techniques, an anatomic approach was used to create a linear lesion between the inferior tricuspid annulus and the eustachian ridge at the anterior margin of the inferior vena cava. In order to demonstrate successful ablation, mapping techniques were employed to show that bi-directional conduction block was present in the low right atrial isthmus.
Results: Successful ablation was achieved in 26/27 patients (96%). In one patient with a grossly enlarged right atrium, isthmus block could not be achieved. Of the 26 patients with successful ablation, mere has been one recurrence of typical flutter (4%) during a mean follow-up period of 5.5±2.7 months. This patient underwent a successful repeat ablation procedure. Of eight patients with documented clinical atrial fibrillation (in addition to atrial flutter) prior to the procedure, five continued to have atrial fibrillation following the ablation. There were no procedural complications and all patients had normal AV conduction at the completion of the ablation.
Conclusions: RF ablation is a highly effective and safe procedure for cure of atrial flutter. In patients with chronic or recurrent forms of atrial flutter RF ablation should be considered as a first line therapeutic option.     

Evaluation of an individualized strategy of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation as an adjunct to atrial fibrillation ablation

Objectives: To evaluate supplementary cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation as an adjunct to atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in selected patients.
Background: It is unclear whether routine CTI ablation is beneficial in all patients undergoing AF ablation.
Methods and Results: In patients undergoing AF ablation, additional CTI block was created only for those with typical atrial flutter (Afl) before or during the ablation. Out of 188 consecutive patients (108 male, 56 ± 9 years), 75 underwent CTI ablation (Group CTI+) and left atrial (LA) ablation (circular mapping-guided extensive pulmonary vein isolation in all and linear LA ablation when required), while 113 underwent LA ablation alone (Group CTI−). Group CTI+ patients had smaller LA and less frequently persistent/permanent AF and linear LA ablation. Over a follow-up of 30 ± 10 months, complications (4% vs 5%, P = NS), typical Afl occurrence (1.3% and 2.6%, P = NS) and AF recurrence (25% and 28%, P = NS) were similar. Atypical Afl was more common in Group CTI− (4 vs 14%, P = 0.026). Eighty-two percent and 79% of patients in Groups CTI+ and CTI−, respectively, remained arrhythmia free in stable sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drug treatment (P = NS).
Conclusions: Avoiding supplementary CTI ablation in AF ablation patients without evidence of typical flutter does not result in a higher incidence of typical Afl. Despite more persistent/permanent AF and larger LA in patients without evidence of typical flutter, a strategy of selective supplementary ablation resulted in similar and low AF recurrence rates in the group without CTI ablation compared with the group with CTI ablation.     

Atypical left atrial flutter after intraoperative radiofrequency ablation of chronic atrial fibrillation: successful ablation using three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping

Curative treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenging task for electrophysiologists. Eliminating the initiating triggers by focal radiofrequency ablation in a subset of patients with paroxysmal AF and modifying the maintaining substrate by performing linear lesions within the left atrium in patients with prolonged episodes of AF are among the alternative approaches for management of these patients. Recently, a new intraoperative treatment procedure aimed at eliminating left atrial anatomic "anchor" reentrant circuits by induction of contiguous lesions using radiofrequency energy under direct vision was introduced. However, atypical left atrial flutter may occur during follow-up after intraoperative ablation of AF. These arrhythmias most likely are due to discontinuities in linear lesions; therefore, they can be successfully mapped and ablated in a subsequent percutaneous catheter ablation procedure. We report and discuss the case of a patient who underwent successful intraoperative ablation of chronic AF, but who developed atypical left atrial flutter postoperatively. Three-dimensional nonfluoroscopic electroanatomic mapping revealed a gap in the linear lesion line connecting the left upper and right upper pulmonary vein orifices. Ablation at the exit site of the breakthrough was successful.     

Outcomes in Patients Requiring Cardioversion Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Outcomes of Cardioversion Post AF Ablation.   Introduction: Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias is commonly noted after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The long-term outcomes of patients who require cardioversion for persistent AF after AF ablation is not known. This study reports the outcomes of patients who underwent cardioversion for persistent AF or atrial flutter following an AF ablation procedure.
Methods: The patient population comprised 55 patients (mean age 58 ± 10 years, 35% paroxysmal) who underwent catheter ablation of AF and subsequently required electrical cardioversion for persistent AF (45 patients) or atrial flutter (10 patients). Cardioversion was defined as early (within 90 days of the ablation procedure) or late (between 90 and 180 days following ablation).
Results: The mean follow-up duration was 15 ± 8 months. Forty-six of the 55 patients (84%) patients experienced recurrence during follow-up. The average time to recurrence after cardioversion was 37 days. Of the 55 patients, 8 (15%) patients had a complete success, 11 (20%) patients had a partial success and 36 patients (65%) had a failed outcome. Seven of the 43 patients (16%) who underwent early cardioversion had a complete success as opposed to one of 12 patients (8%) who underwent late cardioversion (P = 0.49).
Conclusions: This study shows that >80% of patients who undergo cardioversion for persistent AF or atrial flutter after AF ablation have recurrence. The timing of cardioversion did not affect the outcome. These findings allow clinicians to provide realistic expectations to patients regarding the long-term outcome and/or requirement for a second ablation procedure. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 27–32, January 2010)     

Effect of right atrial isthmus ablation on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation: observations in four patient groups having type I atrial flutter with or without associated atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF), in at least some patients with coexisting type I atrial flutter (AFL), is based on macro-reentry around the tricuspid valve orifice, including the right atrial (RA) isthmus, by evaluation of AF recurrences after successful ablation of AFL. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-two consecutive patients with type I AFL, with or without concomitant AF, underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the RA isthmus by an anatomical approach. The results were analyzed in 4 groups of patients: group 1 (only AFL; 29 patients), group 2 (AFL >AF; 22 patients), group 3 (AF >AFL; 15 patients), and group 4 (developing AFL while receiving class IC antiarrhythmic drug therapy for AF, the "class IC atrial flutter"; 16 patients). In all groups, RFA of type I AFL was performed with a high (>/=93%) procedural success rate. In group 1, only 2 patients (8%) had AF after (18+/-14 months) AFL ablation. These figures were 38% (20+/-14 months) and 86% (13+/-8 months) in groups 2 and 3, respectively. Group 4 patients (4+/-2 months) had a 73% freedom of AF recurrences with continuation of the class IC agent. CONCLUSIONS: The low incidence of new AF during long-term follow-up after RFA of type I AFL makes it unlikely that radiofrequency lesions promote the development of AF. The impact of isthmus ablation on AF recurrences differs according to the clinically predominant atrial arrhythmia and suggests a possible role of the RA isthmus in the occurrence of AF in some patients. Ablation of class IC atrial flutter in patients with therapy-resistant AF is a novel approach to management of this patient subset. Careful classification of AF patients plays a role in the selection of the site of ablation therapy.     

Catheter Ablation of Inducible Atrial Flutter, in Combination with Atrial Pacing and Antiarrhythmic Drugs (“Hybrid Therapy”) Improves Rhythm Control in Patients with Refractory Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial flutter or tachycardia may coexist with atrial fibrillation [AF] and can be treated with ablation techniques in attempt to reduce the total AF burden. The role of ablation of latent atrial tachyarrhythmias elicited at electrophysiologic study in conjunction with atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with refractory AF has not been evaluated. We evaluated the efficacy of catheter ablation of electrically induced atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia in improving rhythm control in patients with refractory AF. Methods: Consecutive patients with refractory AF, and spontaneous atrial flutter (Group 1) or without spontaneous atrial flutter (Group 2) underwent programmed stimulation in a baseline drug-free state. All patients had electrically induced atrial flutter or tachycardia. Radiofrequency ablation of the arrhythmia substrate was performed in all patients. Primary endpoints evaluated for patient outcome in both groups included maintenance of rhythm control and freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias. Results: Forty-three patients, with a mean age of 66±13 years were studied. Group 1 consisted of 22 patients while Group 2 had 21 patients. Ablation of the tricuspid valve-inferior venacaval isthmus was performed in 41 patients who had common atrial flutter induced at electrophysiologic study. Ablation of other atrial sites was performed in 8 patients with induced atypical flutter and 4 patients with induced atrial tachycardia. Ten of these patients had ablation of more than one arrhythmia. 17 patients (40%) had atrial pacing instituted and 28 patients remained on a class 1/3 antiarrhythmic drug. During a mean follow-up of 26±14 months, 33 patients (82.5%) remained in rhythm control. Actuarial analysis showed 96% of patients in rhythm control at 6 months, 94% at 12 months, and 90% at 24 months. Freedom from symptomatic AF recurrence was 64% at 6 months, 58% at 12 months, and 42% at 24 months. The outcome for both of these endpoints was similar for Group 1 and Group 2 (p = NS). The AF free interval increased significantly from 7±9 days to 172±121 days (p < 0.01) after ablation. This increase was again similar in both the groups. In the 14 patients were who did not receive atrial pacing and who remained on the same class 1/3 antiarrhythmic drug, the AF free interval increased from 18±17 days to 212±102 days (p < 0.01). Conclusions: We conclude that electrophysiologic studies can elicit latent atrial flutter or tachycardia in patients with refractory AF without spontaneous monomorphic atrial tachyarrhythmias. Catheter ablation of electrically induced atrial flutter or tachycardia either alone, or with atrial pacing and with antiarrhythmic drug may improve rhythm control and reduce AF recurrences. This is similar in patients with and without spontaneous atrial flutter and refractory AF.     

Ablation of perimitral flutter following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: impact on outcomes from a randomized study (PROPOSE)

MVI Block vs Trigger Ablation in PMFL . Introduction: Patients with previous ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may experience recurrence of perimitral flutter (PMFL). These arrhythmias are usually triggered from sources that may also induce AF. This study aims at determining whether ablation of triggers or completing mitral valve isthmus (MVI) block prevents more arrhythmia recurrences. Methods and Results: Sixty‐five patients with recurrent PMFL after initial ablation of long standing persistent AF were included in this study. Thirty‐two patients were randomized to MVI ablation only (Group 1) and 33 were randomized to cardioversion and repeat pulmonary vein (PV) isolation plus ablation of non‐PV triggers (Group 2). MVI bidirectional block was achieved in all but 1 patient from Group 1. In Group 2, reconnection of 17 PVs was detected in 14 patients (42%). With isoproterenol challenge, 44 non‐PV trigger sites were identified in 28 patients (85%, 1.57 sites per patient). At 18‐month follow‐up, 27 patients (84%) from Group 1 had recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias, of whom 15 remained on antiarrhythmic drug (AAD); however, 28 patients from Group 2 (85%, P < 0.0001 vs Group 1) were free from arrhythmia off AAD. The ablation strategy used in Group 2 was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.10, 95% CI 0.04–0.28, P < 0.001) and an improved arrhythmia‐free survival (log rank P < 0.0001). Conclusion: In patients presenting with PMFL after ablation for longstanding persistent AF, MVI block had limited impact on arrhythmia recurrence. On the other hand, elimination of all PV and non‐PV triggers achieved higher freedom from atrial arrhythmias at follow‐up. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 137‐144, February 2012)     

Endurance sports is a risk factor for atrial fibrillation after ablation for atrial flutter

INTRODUCTION: Sports activity has been associated with the development of atrial arrhythmias. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently observed after successful ablation for atrial flutter. Sports activity as a risk factor for AF development after flutter ablation has not been studied. METHODS: We analyzed outcome in 137 patients (83% men) after ablation for isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (excluding patients with concomitant ablation for atrial tachycardia or fibrillation). Sports activity before and after ablation was evaluated by detailed questionnaires. Endurance sports was defined as (semi-)competitive participation in cycling, running or swimming for > or =3 h/week (and for > or =3 years pre-ablation). Median follow-up was 2.5 years. Survival free of AF was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank statistics. Multivariate analysis was based on Cox proportional hazard evaluation. RESULTS: Acute ablation success was 99% and flutter recurrence 4.4%. Thirty-one patients (23%) had been regularly engaged in endurance sports before ablation and 19 (14%) continued regular sports activity afterwards. Those performing sports were slightly younger. A history of endurance sports was a significant risk factor for post-ablation AF (univariate HR 1.96 (1.19-3.22), p<0.01, and multivariate HR 1.81 (1.10-2.98), p=0.02). Also continuation of endurance sports activity after ablation showed a trend for increased risk to develop AF despite a relatively small sample size (n=19; multivariate HR 1.68 (0.92-3.06), p=0.08). Cox proportional hazard calculations revealed a 10% and 11% increased risk for AF development per weekly hour sport performed before and after ablation respectively (p<0.01 for both). CONCLUSION: A history of endurance sports activity is associated with the development of AF after ablation of atrial flutter.